Since its creation, the Workers’ Educational Association has been linked to the ideas of democracy and justice, and the promotion of citizenship through learning. Yet we see huge change all around us in the economy, the media, in social arrangements, and also of course in our cultural tastes and private lives.This must provoke us to question the WEA’s future, and think hard about its mission.
What does it mean today to live in a ‘civilised society’ – and by what yardsticks should we judge whether our society is fair, democratic and just? And if education is a prerequisite for a civilised society, what kind of education and how should it be organised. Henry Tam commented in one of his blogs that the WEA adopted its present name in 1905, three centuries after Francis Bacon published ‘The Advancement of Learning’. In his seminal essay, Bacon argued that human understanding of our world would progress only through open enquiry, tested in practice and debated by learned citizens.
Tam convincingly connects Bacon’s ideas of how knowledge advances with the WEA’s founding goal of enabling all citizens to develop capacities for shaping their own lives. But this was never an individualistic approach. Rather than looking to ‘empower’ people to discover their ‘inner selves’ and rig the competitive odds in their own favour, the WEA from the outset saw itself as a movement which aimed to give its members the ability to function as equal citizens of a democratic nation.
R. H. Tawney, in a presidential address to the WEA in England, put it like this:
All serious educational movements have in England been also social movements. They have been the expression in one sphere – the training of mind and character – of some distinctive conception of the life proper to man and of the kind of society in which he can best live it.
So this is where our journey started: by building a serious social movement with a vigorous and radical educational agenda.
Today, Tawney’s voice often sounds like a distant echo from afar. If we look at the current situation of adult learning in Scotland, we see a government that openly states its preference for investing in the vocational skills of younger adults. We see a steep decline in local government spending on adult community learning, a marked fall in part-time degree provision, and a virtual collapse of part-time programmes in colleges. These have hit adult learners hard, and in particular the last couple of years have witnessed a huge closing down of opportunities for women returners.
Yet Scotland presents plenty for a modern day Tawney to rage against. We live in a society where access to education is skewed massively against the least privileged, and where university entrance is overwhelmingly dominated by young middle and upper class school-leavers. Scotland’s governments have not been exactly renowned for investing in surveys of adult learning, but when they have published national data, we witness extreme inequalities in the distribution of qualifications, and even in the distribution of basic literacy, numeracy and IT skills.
Alongside social and economic inequalities, and superimposed upon them, we find a society that also discriminates by age. Virtually all public spending on education and training is devoted to the under-25s. And participation nose-dives once people get near retirement age, and declines further after they retire. Tawney would have seen this as unjust, unfair, and above all a waste of human potential. And we can go further, for thanks to modern brain science we now know much more about the ability of learning to help stem cognitive decline among our rising population of elderly people.
Whether we like it or not, though, we cannot appeal to the same social movements that Tawney hoped to mobilise through adult learning. Tawney’s WEA was founded at a time when all women, and many working class men, had no right to vote in parliamentary elections. Women struggled and advanced their interests not only through the suffrage movement, but also through the co-operative movement and the unions. Trade unions were growing in strength, as was the modern Labour Party, which during Tawney’s life time went from being a tiny network of individuals to a party of government.
Today, it is hard to view political parties or unions as hives of vigorous debate over democratic engagement and social change. Quite the reverse: the main political parties have lost massive numbers of members since Tawney’s time (he died in 1962), and their active membership is increasingly confined to a small circle of highly educated professionals. Trade union branches and local trades councils rarely meet, and the movement has also lost members. And while feminist ideas are enjoying a lively resurgence, it would be difficult to point to an organised women’s movement any more.
Let me also draw attention to another new feature of today’s learning landscape: competition. Tawney was president of the WEA between 1928 and 1944, and was involved in local government, which he saw as a natural partner in developing a broad and generous adult education provision. Universities – then very small and highly exclusive – were also natural allies for the WEA, and it was common for vice chancellors to chair public occasions such as the address in which Tawney spoke of adult education as a social movement.
I don’t suppose for a moment that Tawney faced nothing but sweetness and light. Today, though, the main providers for adults are colleges; most college principals tend to view other providers as competitors, and behave accordingly. Universities have become ferociously competitive (though in Scotland we always preface any public discussion of inter-university relationships with airy claims about collaboration), though most have lost interest in the local communities that are the WEA’s stamping ground. And I fear that much more serious competition is on its way, not least as a result of the digital revolution.
Who are the WEA’s natural allies today? Where are the agents of tomorrow’s civic renewal and social change? Who are the workers of a modern WEA? Let’s start by acknowledging that, as I have already noted, we have plenty of inequalities to work with. While some of the desperate social ills of Tawney’s day are behind us, we have new inequalities of our own – including the digital inequalities of the information age, the desperately precarious conditions of many workers in our turbo-capitalism, and the greater penalty facing the educationally disadvantaged in a society and economy that place an increasing premium on knowledge.
Second, there are plenty of people who want to become active citizens, or who are already active but would like to become more effective. New social movements of all kinds are proliferating. Some of these appeal to the already-educated, such as the Occupy movement that grabbed the headlines in 2011. There are others that are much more mixed, including movements who appeal mainly to ‘seniors’ or ‘third agers’, as well as a whole host of community based groups, consumer movements and environmental campaigns. While they can often be short lived or parochial in their concerns, they suggest it shouldn’t be too hard to find a worthwhile role for the WEA in supporting civic engagement and social renewal.
There is also the debate opened up by the Scottish referendum. I suspect that the topic of independence is as controversial and divisive among WEA members as it is everywhere in Scotland. But it doesn’t half force us to consider what sort of life is proper to men and women in our country, what sort of society will best promote that life, and what sort of citizen engagement is needed if we are going to get it. Much the same could be said, by the way, about the plans for a referendum on EU membership. Both present intriguing opportunities for a voluntary movement which exists to discuss and promote citizenship and social change, in England and Wales as well as in Scotland.
Third, we have never lived in a world where the opportunities for sharing and debating information and ideas have been so readily available. It is true that the new social media are not free from the taint of corporate control and commercial exploitation, and that governments across the globe are seeking new means of surveillance through the internet. It is also true that tweeting is not in itself much of a political action, and that you can come across some nasty people in the virtual world (as you can in the pub or on the train).
Nevertheless, the openness of the internet has changed the game. Citizenship is starting to mean something different – and possibly more volatile, less predictable – for the digitally skilled. Academic bloggers, myself included, get pulled up sharply if we say something inaccurate, and we are challenged instantly if our views or interpretations strike someone else as silly. And it is the same for ‘authorities’ of all kinds. I see this as part of the process of open dialogue that is needed for a functioning democracy. It is also something that many adult educators have embraced, and that we can and should develop, though as a complement to face-to-face relationships rather than a substitute.
Fourth, the universities are not entirely beyond redemption. They are unlikely to restore the much-damaged tradition of extra-mural provision that became so prominent from the Second World War through to the 1980s. But the universities are under a growing social pressure to show that their research merits the level of public funding that it enjoys. The UK research councils increasingly expect researchers to show that they have engaged with ‘end users’ (loosely translated as ‘other people’) before agreeing to fund projects. The higher education funding councils are measuring ‘impact’ as part of the research quality assessment.
This has had a mixed response from higher education. You can predict the arguments against this sort of development, but cooler heads have spotted opportunities. Nimble universities like Birmingham and Warwick are appointing professors to promote the public understanding of science or philosophy. Learned societies are developing ‘public engagement’ strategies. And some institutions are quietly reminding people that they have always tried to make research relevant to their communities. So there are at least some natural allies for the WEA inside higher education.
Last, and certainly not least, we have built up an impressive body of evidence on the ways in which adult learning can benefit civic engagement and social change. Let me be slightly self-indulgent for a moment. Computerisation has reached the stage where we can process massive amounts of data on a laptop, and this has transformed the prospects for social research, and in particular for studies that use advanced statistical methods. We now have a whole batch of analyses of longitudinal data which show what taking a course does to people’s lives over time.
I get very excited by this partly because I was trained in statistics in the days of punch cards, and I had to schlep over to the library building to pick up my results (in the form of a large pile of folded paper) weeks after I had sent them in for processing. But I am also hugely enthused by the results, most of which broadly confirm what people like WEA members already knew. The difference is that we now have some evidence. Very good evidence, in fact.
They show, among other things, that adult education has a relatively small but clear and detectable effect on people’s self-efficacy, their contribution to the community, and their level of tolerance of others. They show this for members of different age groups, for both genders, and (very broadly) for different types of learning. In addition, we have some early findings from neuroscience about the effects of adult learning on the brain, and again these are broadly rather encouraging – and certainly point to the enormous potential for future research.
So we have some rather impressive research on the way in which adult learning can help people pursue exactly the goals that the WEA exists to promote. As an academic researcher, the only question in my mind is whether adult education movements can make effective use of that research in arguing their case.
Let me round off, then, by saying that if the future is another country, it doesn’t look such a bad place for the WEA as might at first seem. Of course the recession is going to place constraints on what we can achieve, and the next few years are bound to be difficult ones for any organisation that depends on public funding. But there are also real reasons to be hopeful about the WEA’s future, and to think with hope about the century that lies ahead. The WEA in Scotland has a bold and ambitious mission, and I would like to close with a question that uses that mission as a framework for evaluation. What does each WEA class contribute towards intellectual understanding, confidence and social and collective responsibility?
This blog started life as a keynote to the 2012 annual general meeting and conference of the WEA Scotland.