Genetic Similarities: Wilson, Sarich, Sibley, and Ahlquist
To investigate how birds are related to one another, a biologist of the 1950s would have carefully
studied their anatomical similarities and differences. But today, a scientist working on the same
problem could also use the very instructions from which that anatomy was built: its genetic code.
DNA sequences form the hereditary links
between generations, so it is no surprise that scientists investigating evolutionary relationships
have sought to get closer and closer to the DNA that underlies those relationships. However, reading
the genomes of entire organisms did
not fall immediately from the discovery of DNA in the 1950s. In small steps, scientists came closer
to their target.
Scientists first began to zoom in on gene
sequences by studying the products of
DNA: proteins. After all, if
two species are closely related, they
should have similar gene sequences, which should then make similar proteins. So before the 1970s,
proteins were used as stand-ins for genes in
Testing similarity using antibodies
One way that researchers assessed protein similarities was by harnessing the immune system's ability
to recognize foreign proteins. For example, the immune system of a rabbit will recognize a human protein as
foreign and will mount an attack against it by making antibodies specific to that protein. If those same
rabbit antibodies are exposed to a similar protein from a chimpanzee, perhaps they will attack
it as well. The more similar the proteins from the two species (human and chimpanzee) are, the stronger
this second attack will be. Although variations of this technique were being employed as early as 1904,
more sensitive protocols were developed in the 1960s. These more sensitive techniques revealed
the remarkable similarity between the proteins of humans and those of other great apes. Expanding upon the
work of others and making the assumption that fewer protein differences corresponded to shorter times of
separation, Vincent Sarich (above left) and Allan Wilson (above right) estimated
that humans, chimpanzees, and gorillas shared a common ancestor only 5 million years ago a much
shorter length of time than was commonly accepted at the time.
Times of divergence and phylogeny of hominoids, as estimated from immunological data.
Testing similarity using DNA
Scientists studying the chemistry of DNA moved even closer to actual
sequences. Charles Sibley (left) and Jon Ahlquist pioneered the use of DNA kinetics to investigate
evolutionary relationships using a technique called
DNA-DNA hybridization (see figure, right). Each DNA molecule
is made of two strands of nucleotides. If
the strands are heated, they will separateand as they cool, the attraction of the nucleotides will make
them bond back together again. To compare different species, scientists cut the DNA of the species into small
segments, separate the strands, and mix the DNA together. When the two species' DNA bonds together, the
match between the two strands will not be perfect since there are genetic differences between the
species and the more imperfect the match, the weaker the bond between the two strands. These weak bonds
can be broken with just a little heat, while closer matches require more heat to separate the strands again.
DNA hybridization can measure how similar the DNA of different species is more similar DNA
hybrids "melt" at higher temperatures. When this technique was applied to primate relationships, it
suggested that humans and chimpanzees carried DNA more similar to one another's than to orangutans' or
Hypothesized evolutionary relationships between humans and their close relatives based on DNA-DNA hybridization data.
The first DNA sequencing methods were invented in the late 1970s, but pure DNA, ready for sequencing, was
difficult to produce thus, making DNA sequencing labor- and time-intensive compared to other tools for
making indirect inferences about genetic sequences. However, in the late 1980s, scientists developed a
technique for producing many, many copies of a very small amount of DNA, and this invention sparked an explosion
in the study of DNA sequences. Researchers began to rely upon sequences as a crucial source of evidence for
|Machines that automatically sequence DNA have made those sequences readily available for evolutionary research.
Sequencing genes seems to become easier every day. Ten years ago, it
might have taken an hour to sequence 10 base
pairs. Today a typical lab can sequence 100 base pairs in an hour and
facilities with the latest technology sequence hundreds of base pairs
each minute. We are now awash in genetic code we have a basic map
of the human genome and the genomes of many other organisms. However,
DNA sequences alone do not answer all the questions that biologists ask,
and knowing a gene's sequence is still many steps away from understanding
how it actually works and what it does. DNA sequences are only one line
of evidence illuminating evolutionary relationships. For example, human
and chimpanzee DNA is 98% identical, and genetic sequencing can tell us
exactly where in the genome those few DNA differences are but anatomical,
behavioral, and developmental studies are also crucial in deeply understanding
our differences, similarities, and shared evolutionary history.