Would you feel less guilty about whipping out your credit card if you knew buying stuff could actually help save the planet from climate change? Especially if that piece of plastic was biodegradable?
Now's your chance to find out.
A company called Sustain:Green will purchase two pounds of carbon dioxide offsets for every dollar spent using its new biodegradable MasterCard. (The first purchase made with the card earns 5,000 pounds of offsets.) The carbon credits help finance reforestation of the Amazon in Brazil to absorb greenhouse gases that are warming the planet.
The credit card, that symbol of rampant consumerism, is being repurposed. Instead of giving you frequent flyer points as a reward for buying an airline ticket, it will offset some of the carbon emissions from your flight by helping grow a new rainforest.
Arthur Newman, chief executive of Sustain:Green, said no matter how dedicated people may be to reducing their personal carbon footprint — recycling, composting, driving an electric car — they almost certainly use a credit card to buy new products. In other words, if we're all going to buy carbon-intensive goods and services, why not do what we can to ameliorate the damage?
TakePart action widget:
"Credit cards are a real issue," said Newman, a former Wall Street banker who co-founded Sustain:Green in 2013. " It's something that you use every day but it doesn't seem to be at the forefront of the discussion" about climate change.
Carbon offsets, of course, have been around for years. When companies or non-profits undertake projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions, they can receive credits for offsetting that spew. Those credits can be sold on carbon markets to finance other projects to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Consumers have been able to buy carbon offsets for a number of years. For instance, some airlines let you can choose to voluntarily offset you flights by buying carbon credits. And Commerce Bank, which issues the Sustain:Green's MasterCard, has let some customers cash in their credit card points for carbon offsets.
The problem, according to Chad Doza, Commerce's senior vice president of consumer credit cards, is the voluntarily part. "We saw some struggles in that area with the recession as people were not willing to redeem their points for carbon credits," he said.
Users of the Sustain:Green MasterCard, on the other hand, need do nothing but hand over their plastic to a cashier to rack up offsets as each purchase automatically results in the purchase of a carbon credit.
"Once you're a cardholder, you get a personal carbon homepage where you can track your offsetting through the use of the card and compare that to your footprint," said Newman. "You really get to see what you're doing and can compare yourself against your peers."
Sustain:Green buys carbon offsets generated by Nike. In 2006, the athletic apparel giant had voluntarily stopped using sulfur hexafluoride in the manufacture of its shoes, preventing millions of pounds of the potent greenhouse gas from entering the atmosphere. Nike earned carbon offset credits, which were verified and listed by the non-profit American Carbon Registry. Sales of the Nike offsets finance the Mata no Peito project, which aims to reforest swaths of Brazil.
Over time, the forests will generate their own offsets that can be sold to pay for other projects to reduce carbon pollution.
The Sustain:Green card itself is designed not to pollute the planet. Throw it into your home compost or a landfill and it will biodegrade into water and oxygen, according to the company.
"There's about a billion and a half credit and debit cards in circulation in the U.S. and about half a billion end up in the dump every year," said Newman.
Doza said his bank, which has promoted sustainability, doesn't see the Sustain:Green MasterCard as a niche market.
"There's been an evolution of the mindset around sustainability in the U.S. and we do see there's growing awareness of these issues," he said. "It's harder and harder for people to ignore the data out there about climate change."
This article originally published at TakePart here