(Reprinted with permission)
Robert Dicke claimed that many relative motion theories for the invisible forces had been put forth but Dicke insisted that gravity could not be caused by relative motion because if it was then we would see interference fringes and we do not.
There is some interest now, however, in a wave related, relative motion, unified field theory that would not produce any interference fringes which were Robert Dicke's main objection to this type of theory.
This new wave related, relative motion, unified field theory is based on the scalar wave resonance of particles with their surroundings that Milo Wolff discovered and on Caroline Thompson's discovery that repulsive force is always generated with out of phase waves but never with in phase waves.
Caroline H. Thompson, who graduated from Cambridge, and Bill Shockley, who won the Nobel prize for physics in 1956, have much in common.
The tensor math of general relativity uses space-time distortion instead of force. So does this new concept. But in addition this new hypothesis makes the claim that TIME is being produced at the scalar wave resonance frequency that Milo Wolff discovered and SPACE (repulsive force) is being constantly manufactured by out of phase, transverse waves that are produced at the scalar wave entity's spin/orbit frequency.
If this new concept is correct then Einstein was right and the answer is indeed a simple wave explanation with scalar wave resonances giving us TIME and particles. The lower frequency transverse waves, produced by these spinning particles and particle agglomerations, are then giving us SPACE and force.
ALL spin/orbit frequencies then will be producing an AVERAGE, out of phase wave, force
Waves more in phase than average will cause ATTRACTIVE forces and waves more out of phase than average will cause REPULSIVE forces.
Using the above concept, you can even begin to understand why we must have general relativity and even the tensor math of general relativity won't show you that.
While this concept is simple, the math will be the very reciprocal of this simplicity because all surrounding waves must now be taken into consideration. (Mach's principle)
You will even have DIFFERENT space-time realms (a different space-time interval) being produced at each different spin/orbit frequency.
Milo Wolff seems to have given us the very first mathematical proof of Mach's principle, that surroundings are most certainly entering into this. This is why it is, in fact, a relative motion theory that seems to obey Ampere's 1825 laws.
Knowing this allows you to use "Ampere's 1825 Laws" to properly get the "big picture" of this universe and finally see how simple it all is as seen from a frequency/wave aspect.
The "A" Laws
Dirac claimed we would find an approximation of how this all worked,
Return to RB Duncan Press
(c) 2004 RB Duncan Press
All rights reserved
complaints about anything on this site???
post to: Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.
Over 4 Decades of Daniel P. Fitzpatrick's Books, Papers and Thoughts
Over 4 Decades of Fitzpatrick's Books, Papers & Thoughts http://www.amperefitz.com/4.decades.htm