It is a continuation of the reading from "The Bell Beaker Transition in Europe" by Prieto-Martinez and Salanova. As usual, I'll give you a brief description then streak across the soccer field of ideas.
In ancient times people procured salt in a variety of ways, but the most accessible way since the Early Neolithic appears to have been the process of briquetage, which reduces brine down through boiling.
Molino Sanchon II is a salt production site where salt was produced through boiling salt marsh water. Many types of coarse ceramic sherds are present. What's puzzling though, is that there is a substantial amount of broken Bell Beaker funeral pottery, the largest concentration of this pottery at one site anywhere in Iberia. This is a site that was flooded most of the year, so no one was buried here. Unlike Fuente Camacho* (more below), we can positively exclude habitation as well, so that presents us with a basic problem.
Analysis of the funerary sherds do not show that the pottery was used for salt production, so the volume of Beaker pottery (2% of the total sherds, but still a large amount) is somewhat out of place and its purpose at this site doesn't really make a lot of sense. Nevertheless, someone put it there on a regular basis over a period of time.
It's not a case where extremely clumsy people are eating out of funerary ware and breaking pots all over a salt reduction site. The authors make a case that the people making the salt were making votive offerings and smashing pottery (something Beakers did) and this also had the effect of establishing their ancestral claim to this turf. Sounds high-brow but is very inline with what is likely to be the thought process of a person at that time. All very, very plausible.
|Contemporary salt glazed stoneware (Commons)|
To preface this next segment I'll say that I use every paper on the Beakerblog as a means to open discussion on a problem rather than critique the paper. I think this is usually in line with the character of most academics, to present a problem and propose likely solutions as a means of soliciting alternatives or confirmation.
I'll submit a far-fetched, second possibility that may account for both the volume of funerary ware and its presence at a site where salt was being generated. That is the possibility that Beaker funerary ware was being salt glazed (with sodium chloride) at this site in addition to general salt production and, as is often the case with kilning, many pieces do not survive firing or do not come out well.
Since sodium silicate is water soluble it is unlikely that any hypothetical glazed sherd would keep from breaking down over such a long time, especially for being such a thin layer. Also depending on how a pottery is kilned, there may be an absence of glazing on the inside of pottery. It's more likely that the interior of liquid bearing pottery would have been burnished with beeswax.
The volume of salt needed to salt glaze pottery is fairly substantial, so it could be funerary pottery was made in several distinct phases. The other thing is that the level of silica and iron in Beaker pottery would be very conducive for producing a dull semi-gloss red, even though using sodium for glazing is first used in Europe during Medieval Times. Glazing with lead salt goes back to at least Roman Times, so its not impossible that certain types of glazing were known and fell in and out of fashion at different times. Here's some modern salt glazing on youtube [here]
There is also this paper concerning a similar phenomenon in Andalusia at the similarly aged Fuente Camacho, lots of salt and lots of varied, special purpose pottery in addition to the more abundant coarse pottery. Whereas Molino Sanchon is definitely not a habitation, Fuente Camacho probably was not as well, since it's in an unusual place for a settlement and the fact it is situated near a salt water spring. Like in Molino Sanchon II, the problem in Andalusia is the pottery is extremely varied table ware and funerary ware, and interestingly notable, includes funerary ware from the Agaric Culture.
If Fuente Camacho is not settlement, then it can only be a strict salt production site. If that's the case, then why the volume of highly varied ware? If the potteries were votive in nature, should be expect such a variety?
Let me close in saying that my purpose here is not to offer serious criticism or well thought out alternative hypotheses but to engage in fully self-serving gratification by streaking naked through the university campus. It is gonzo archaeology. Someone writes a serious paper and then I take it and go to wacko world.
"EL APROVECHAMIENTO PREHISTÓRICO DE SAL EN LA ALTA ANDALUCÍA. EL CASO DE FUENTE CAMACHO (LOJA, GRANADA)" (The prehistoric use of salt in upper Andalusia. The case of Fuente Camacho (Loja, Granada), Jonathan Teran Manrique and Antonio Morgado, (2011)