From Eugene, Oregon, USA:
My father has type 1 diabetes and was diagnosed at 18 years of age. I now have a daughter, four and a half months of age. Her pediatrician has told me that recent research shows that waiting at least six months before introducing solid foods reduces the risk of type 1. How strong is the research to support this?
I do not think that those data are strong. Many things have "come and gone" to try to explain higher risks and incidence of type 1 diabetes, including, but not limited to, early use of cow's milk, decreased sunshine exposure, immunizations, and our "cleaner" environment. All have been shown by high powered statistics to be BUNK. The truth is, for now, we don't know. (I personally favor a bit of Darwinism: we now treat people with type 1 diabetes who no longer die but go on to live and reproduce and thus pass their "risk- of-diabetes-genes" to subsequent and more generations, who have children together, who pass on the higher-risk genes, etc. This is MY PET theory which has no direct scientific basis of which I am aware).
But, for decades and decades, pediatricians have preached that there is no benefit nutritionally or socially in introducing solid foods before four to six months. Cereals first, then vegetables (at seven months) and then starches, eggs, and meats (after six months.) Talk with your pediatrician as to his/her preferences.
Original posting 13 Apr 2005
Posted to Research: Causes and Prevention
Last Updated: Tuesday April 06, 2010 15:10:02
This Internet site provides information of a general nature and is designed for educational purposes only. If you have any concerns about your own health or the health of your child, you should always consult with a physician or other health care professional.
This site is published by T-1 Today, Inc. (d/b/a Children with Diabetes), a 501c3 not-for-profit organization, which is responsible for its contents.
© Children with Diabetes, Inc. 1995-2015. Comments and Feedback.