Majority of the women representing 56% agree that they should also contribute to the family income while only 44% of the men agree. Over the years, there have been discussions as to whether husbands and wives should contribute to the household income. On one hand, there have been arguments that men are the providers and should contribute solely to the family income while women should just take care of the family. However, women are increasingly gaining employments and there are many cases where women have higher incomes than their husbands (Bradbury, 2009). Currently roles in the society are changing and women are taking time to study and build careers unlike earlier times when women’s roles revolved around the home.
First-Class Online Research Paper Writing Service
- Your research paper is written by a PhD professor
- Your requirements and targets are always met
- You are able to control the progress of your writing assignment
- You get a chance to become an excellent student!
Women are more willing to contribute to the family income as represented by 56%. It is also visible through the lower percentage of the women who disagreed. On the contrary, majority of the husbands feel that they should bear the sole responsibility of providing for their families, evidenced by only 44% of the males agreeing to the women contributing to the family income. We can also deduce the fact that men are opposed to women contributing to the family income through the percentage of males that disagreed. This could be as a result of the maleswanting to maintain their dominance as the heads of the family and preservation of their ego and masculinity. I, therefore agree that both men and women should contribute to the family income.
FEPOLY=MEN OR WOMEN BETTER SUITED FOR POLITICS
Would you say that most men are better suited emotionally for politics than are most women that men and women are equally suited, or that women are better suited than men in this area?
The table above observes data from various variables, males, females and emotional suitability for politics. The table reveals a very small difference in percentage between the males’ and females’ emotional suitability for politics. This is representation that there are no major differences between males and females’ emotional capability in politics. 45.5% of males think that males and females are equal emotionally, while 54.5% of women feel that men and women are equal emotionally. 45.6% of the females feel that men are better emotionally than women, while 54.4% feel that women are better emotionally than men resulting in a difference of only 0.1%. 44.5% of males feel that males are better emotionally than females for politics and 55.5% of the men feel that females are better emotionally. Alll percentage incline to the fact women are better suited than their male counterparts. The percentage reveal that even males share the idea that women are better emotionally as revealed by the 44.5% and 55.4%
This could be a result of how women were created: their voices is said to be very distinctive and they articulate and implement goals rooted in the preservation of personal commitments, relationships and orientation that centers on other people rather than their own selves. Females are likely to introduce policies that have impact on the wellbeing of the families and the society, advocate for underrepresented groups and place emphasis of constituency service instead of dominating in committee communications like their male counterparts (Peters and Rosenthal, 2010). It is also evident that power motivates males and females differently, and females are more likely to share their power while at the same time using it to promote change while men use the power they gain to reward, have influence or punish others. Women are also likely to create time to listen and understand what other people are going through unlike men who do not have time for such. I, therefore, agree with the idea that females are better suited emotionally for politics than males.