Mapping hot spots of breast cancer mortality in the United States: place matters for Blacks and Hispanics
The goals of this study were to identify geographic and racial/ethnic variation in breast cancer mortality, and evaluate whether observed geographic differences are explained by county-level characteristics.
We analyzed data on breast cancer deaths among women in 3,108 contiguous United States (US) counties from years 2000 through 2015. We applied novel geospatial methods and identified hot spot counties based on breast cancer mortality rates. We assessed differences in county-level characteristics between hot spot and other counties using Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Spearman correlation, and stratified all analysis by race/ethnicity.
Among all women, 80 of 3,108 (2.57%) contiguous US counties were deemed hot spots for breast cancer mortality with the majority located in the southern region of the US (72.50%, p value < 0.001). In race/ethnicity-specific analyses, 119 (3.83%) hot spot counties were identified for NH-Black women, with the majority being located in southern states (98.32%, p value < 0.001). Among Hispanic women, there were 83 (2.67%) hot spot counties and the majority was located in the southwest region of the US (southern = 61.45%, western = 33.73%, p value < 0.001). We did not observe definitive geographic patterns in breast cancer mortality for NH-White women. Hot spot counties were more likely to have residents with lower education, lower household income, higher unemployment rates, higher uninsured population, and higher proportion indicating cost as a barrier to medical care.
We observed geographic and racial/ethnic disparities in breast cancer mortality: NH-Black and Hispanic breast cancer deaths were more concentrated in southern, lower SES counties.
KeywordsBreast cancer Health disparities Socioeconomic factors Geospatial analysis
Funding was provided by National Cancer Institute (Grant Nos. R25 CA47888, U54 CA118948, and T32190194), Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital, and National Institute for Nursing Research ( Grant No R01-NR012726).
- 28.CDC (2016) Wide-ranging online data for epidemiologic research (CDC-Wonder). http://wonder.cdc.gov Accessed 15 May 2016
- 29.Manson S et al (2017) Minnesota population center: national historical geographic information system: version 2.0. University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
- 30.University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute (2016) County health rankings & roadmapsGoogle Scholar
- 33.Census (2016) Geographic terms and concepts: census divisions and census regions. https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/gtc/gtc_census_divreg.html Accessed 15 May 2016
- 38.Nassel AF, Root ED, Haukoos JS, McVaney K, Colwell C, Robinson J, Eigel B, Magid DJ, Sasson C (2014) Multiple cluster analysis for the identification of high-risk census tracts for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in Denver, Colorado. Resuscitation 85:1667–1673CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 39.Anselin L (2004) Exploring spatial data with GeoDa: a workbook. University of Illinois, Urbana-ChampaignGoogle Scholar