Classify the text into the following 29 labels: 'Impacts on suppliers and other parties in registrant's value chain', 'Physical climate risks', 'Climate risks Materiality', 'Progress on achieving climate-related targets', 'Impacts on business operations', 'Reporting to Board', 'Impacts on mitigation and adaptation activities', 'Adoption of Transition Plan', 'Impacts on products and services', 'Internal carbon price and Carbon pricing as a measure of climate risk', 'Plan on how to achieve the targets', 'Transition risks', "Board's oversight of climate-related targets and goals", 'Targets as a part of the business model', 'NO', 'Emissions. Scope 2', 'Identified impacts as part of business strategy', 'Emissions. Scope 1', 'Climate Risk Identification and Assessment', 'Climate risk management and integration', 'Impacts on expenditure for research and development', 'Use of carbon offsets', "Management's Oversight and Expertise", "Board's oversight", "Transition's Plan Cost", 'Adoption of scenario analysis', 'Management Oversight Process', 'GHG Methodology', 'Time Horizons of Risks', and return the answer as the corresponding climate disclosure label.
text: We use a uniform project screening value Psv of 40 real terms per tonne of carbon dioxide CO2 equivalent to the total Ghg emissions of each investment to test the resilience of new projects across a range of future scenarios. This process includes the development of detailed Ghg and energy management plans, as well as sensitivity testing for high-emitting projects. Projects in the most Ghg-exposed asset classes have Ghg intensity targets that reflect standards sufficient to allow them to compete and prosper in a more CO2 regulated projects.
label: Adoption of scenario analysis