  The paper advocates for LLMs to enhance the accessibility, usage and
explainability of rule-based legal systems, contributing to a democratic and
stakeholder-oriented view of legal technology. A methodology is developed to
explore the potential use of LLMs for translating the explanations produced by
rule-based systems, from high-level programming languages to natural language,
allowing all users a fast, clear, and accessible interaction with such
technologies. The study continues by building upon these explanations to
empower laypeople with the ability to execute complex juridical tasks on their
own, using a Chain of Prompts for the autonomous legal comparison of different
rule-based inferences, applied to the same factual case.
