  Robustness is a correctness notion for concurrent programs running under
relaxed consistency models. The task is to check that the relaxed behavior
coincides (up to traces) with sequential consistency (SC). Although
computationally simple on paper (robustness has been shown to be
PSPACE-complete for TSO, PGAS, and Power), building a practical robustness
checker remains a challenge. The problem is that the various relaxations lead
to a dramatic number of computations, only few of which violate robustness.
  In the present paper, we set out to reduce the search space for robustness
checkers. We focus on store-atomic consistency models and establish two
completeness results. The first result, called locality, states that a
non-robust program always contains a violating computation where only one
thread delays commands. The second result, called singularity, is even stronger
but restricted to programs without lightweight fences. It states that there is
a violating computation where a single store is delayed.
  As an application of the results, we derive a linear-size source-to-source
translation of robustness to SC-reachability. It applies to general programs,
regardless of the data domain and potentially with an unbounded number of
threads and with unbounded buffers. We have implemented the translation and
verified, for the first time, PGAS algorithms in a fully automated fashion. For
TSO, our analysis outperforms existing tools.
