  Consensus enables n processes to agree on a common valid L-bit value, despite
t < n/3 processes being faulty and acting arbitrarily. A long line of work has
been dedicated to improving the worst-case communication complexity of
consensus in partial synchrony. This has recently culminated in the worst-case
word complexity of O(n^2). However, the worst-case bit complexity of the best
solution is still O(n^2 L + n^2 kappa) (where kappa is the security parameter),
far from the \Omega(n L + n^2) lower bound. The gap is significant given the
practical use of consensus primitives, where values typically consist of
batches of large size (L > n).
  This paper shows how to narrow the aforementioned gap while achieving optimal
linear latency. Namely, we present a new algorithm, DARE (Disperse, Agree,
REtrieve), that improves upon the O(n^2 L) term via a novel dispersal
primitive. DARE achieves O(n^{1.5} L + n^{2.5} kappa) bit complexity, an
effective sqrt{n}-factor improvement over the state-of-the-art (when L > n
kappa). Moreover, we show that employing heavier cryptographic primitives,
namely STARK proofs, allows us to devise DARE-Stark, a version of DARE which
achieves the near-optimal bit complexity of O(n L + n^2 poly(kappa)). Both DARE
and DARE-Stark achieve optimal O(n) latency.
