  We analyse strategic, complete information, sequential voting with ordinal
preferences over the alternatives. We consider several voting mechanisms:
plurality voting and approval voting with deterministic or uniform tie-breaking
rules. We show that strategic voting in these voting procedures may lead to a
very undesirable outcome: Condorcet winning alternative might be rejected,
Condorcet losing alternative might be elected, and Pareto dominated alternative
might be elected. These undesirable phenomena occur already with four
alternatives and a small number of voters. For the case of three alternatives
we present positive and negative results.
