  A system's apparent simplicity depends on whether it is represented
classically or quantally. This is not so surprising, as classical and quantum
physics are descriptive frameworks built on different assumptions that capture,
emphasize, and express different properties and mechanisms. What is surprising
is that, as we demonstrate, simplicity is ambiguous: the relative simplicity
between two systems can change sign when moving between classical and quantum
descriptions. Thus, notions of absolute physical simplicity---minimal structure
or memory---at best form a partial, not a total, order. This suggests that
appeals to principles of physical simplicity, via Ockham's Razor or to the
"elegance" of competing theories, may be fundamentally subjective, perhaps even
beyond the purview of physics itself. It also raises challenging questions in
model selection between classical and quantum descriptions. Fortunately,
experiments are now beginning to probe measures of simplicity, creating the
potential to directly test for ambiguity.
