  It is argued that the $x-y$ cancellation model (XYCM) is a good proxy for
discussions of finetuned cancellations in physical theories. XYCM is then
analyzed from a statistical perspective, where it is argued that a finetuned
point in the parameter space is not abnormal, with any such point being just as
probable as any other point. However, landing inside a standardly defined
finetuned region (i.e., the full parameter space of finetuned points) has a
much lower probability than landing outside the region, and that probability is
invariant under assumed ranges of parameters. This proposition requires
asserting also that the finetuned target region is a priori established.
Therefore, it is surmised that highly finetuned theories are generally expected
to be highly improbable. An actionable implication of this moderate naturalness
position is that the search for a non-finetuned explanation to supplant an
apparently finetuned theory is likely to be a valid pursuit, but not guaranteed
to be. A statistical characterization of this moderate position is presented,
as well as those of the extreme pro-naturalness and anti-naturalness positions.
