  We revisit recent claims that there is a "cold spot" in both number counts
and brightness of radio sources in the NVSS survey, with location coincident
with the previously detected cold spot in WMAP. Such matching cold spots would
be difficult if not impossible to explain in the standard LCDM cosmological
model. Contrary to the claim, we find no significant evidence for the radio
cold spot, after including systematic effects in NVSS, and carefully accounting
for the effect of a posteriori choices when assessing statistical significance.
