  Exaggeration or context changes can render maintainability experience into
prejudice. For example, JavaScript is often seen as least elegant language and
hence of lowest maintainability. Such prejudice should not guide decisions
without prior empirical validation. We formulated 10 hypotheses about
maintainability based on prejudices and test them in a large set of open-source
projects (6,897 GitHub repositories, 402 million lines, 5 programming
languages). We operationalize maintainability with five static analysis
metrics. We found that JavaScript code is not worse than other code, Java code
shows higher maintainability than C# code and C code has longer methods than
other code. The quality of interface documentation is better in Java code than
in other code. Code developed by teams is not of higher and large code bases
not of lower maintainability. Projects with high maintainability are not more
popular or more often forked. Overall, most hypotheses are not supported by
open-source data.
