  In this paper, I respond to a critique of one of my papers previously
published in this journal, entitled `Dr. Bertlmann's socks in a quaternionic
world of ambidextral reality.' The geometrical framework presented in my paper
is based on a quaternionic 3-sphere, or S^3, taken as a model of the physical
space in which we are inescapably confined to perform all our experiments. The
framework intrinsically circumvents Bell's theorem by reproducing the singlet
correlations local-realistically, without resorting to backward causation,
superdeterminism, or any other conspiracy loophole. In this response, I
demonstrate point by point that, contrary to its claims, the critique has not
found any mistakes in my paper, either in the analytical model of the singlet
correlations or in its event-by-event numerical simulation based on Geometric
Algebra.
