  Stellar models generally use simple parametrizations to treat convection. The
most widely used parametrization is the so-called "Mixing Length Theory" where
the convective eddy sizes are described using a single number, \alpha, the
mixing-length parameter. This is a free parameter, and the general practice is
to calibrate \alpha using the known properties of the Sun and apply that to all
stars. Using data from NASA's Kepler mission we show that using the
solar-calibrated \alpha is not always appropriate, and that in many cases it
would lead to estimates of initial helium abundances that are lower than the
primordial helium abundance. Kepler data allow us to calibrate \alpha for many
other stars and we show that for the sample of stars we have studied, the
mixing-length parameter is generally lower than the solar value. We studied the
correlation between \alpha and stellar properties, and we find that \alpha
increases with metallicity. We therefore conclude that results obtained by
fitting stellar models or by using population-synthesis models constructed with
solar values of \alpha are likely to have large systematic errors. Our results
also confirm theoretical expectations that the mixing-length parameter should
vary with stellar properties.
