  The bias-variance tradeoff tells us that as model complexity increases, bias
falls and variances increases, leading to a U-shaped test error curve. However,
recent empirical results with over-parameterized neural networks are marked by
a striking absence of the classic U-shaped test error curve: test error keeps
decreasing in wider networks. This suggests that there might not be a
bias-variance tradeoff in neural networks with respect to network width, unlike
was originally claimed by, e.g., Geman et al. (1992). Motivated by the shaky
evidence used to support this claim in neural networks, we measure bias and
variance in the modern setting. We find that both bias and variance can
decrease as the number of parameters grows. To better understand this, we
introduce a new decomposition of the variance to disentangle the effects of
optimization and data sampling. We also provide theoretical analysis in a
simplified setting that is consistent with our empirical findings.
