  Biological network alignment (NA) aims to find a node mapping between
species' molecular networks that uncovers similar network regions, thus
allowing for transfer of functional knowledge between the aligned nodes.
However, current NA methods do not end up aligning functionally related nodes.
A likely reason is that they assume it is topologically similar nodes that are
functionally related. However, we show that this assumption does not hold well.
So, a paradigm shift is needed with how the NA problem is approached. We
redefine NA as a data-driven framework, TARA (daTA-dRiven network Alignment),
which attempts to learn the relationship between topological relatedness and
functional relatedness without assuming that topological relatedness
corresponds to topological similarity, like traditional NA methods do. TARA
trains a classifier to predict whether two nodes from different networks are
functionally related based on their network topological patterns. We find that
TARA is able to make accurate predictions. TARA then takes each pair of nodes
that are predicted as related to be part of an alignment. Like traditional NA
methods, TARA uses this alignment for the across-species transfer of functional
knowledge. Clearly, TARA as currently implemented uses topological but not
protein sequence information for this task. We find that TARA outperforms
existing state-of-the-art NA methods that also use topological information,
WAVE and SANA, and even outperforms or complements a state-of-the-art NA method
that uses both topological and sequence information, PrimAlign. Hence, adding
sequence information to TARA, which is our future work, is likely to further
improve its performance.
