  In his Comment, Temesv\'{a}ri objects to a remark in our paper [Phys.\ Rev.\
B {\bf 91}, 104432 (2015)] that his result for the form of the Almeida-Thouless
(AT) line obtained in an earlier paper with Parisi [Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 858},
293 (2012)] in six dimensions can be obtained by taking the limit of $d \to 6$
in the equations valid for $d>6$, but that this violated one of the
inequalities needed for their validity. He is just pointing out that they gave
a derivation of the form of the AT line in six dimensions in [Nucl.\ Phys.\ B
{\bf 858}, 293 (2012)] which avoided this difficulty. However, it is still a
perturbative approach, and does not deal with the lack of a perturbative fixed
point found by Bray and Roberts [J. Phys. C {\bf 13}, 5405 (1980)] long ago.
