  In this short commentary we provide our comment on the article "Explicit
Analytical Solution for Random Close Packing in $d=2$ and $d=3$" and its
subsequent Erratum that are recently published in Physical Review Letters. In
that Letter, the author presented an explicit analytical derivation of the
volume fractions $\phi_{\rm RCP}$ for random close packings (RCP) in both $d=2$
and $d=3$. Here we first briefly show the key parts of the derivation in
Ref.~\cite{Za22}, and then provide arguments on why we think the derivation of
the analytical results is problematic and unjustified, and why the Erratum does
not address or clarify the concerns raised previously by us.
