  We report several important observations that underscore the distinctions
between the constrained-path Monte Carlo method and the continuum and lattice
versions of the fixed-node method. The main distinctions stem from the
differences in the state space in which the random walk occurs and in the
manner in which the random walkers are constrained. One consequence is that in
the constrained-path method the so-called mixed estimator for the energy is not
an upper bound to the exact energy, as previously claimed. Several ways of
producing an energy upper bound are given, and relevant methodological aspects
are illustrated with simple examples.
