  There has been an increased interest in the use of deep learning approaches
for software analytics tasks. State-of-the-art techniques leverage modern deep
learning techniques such as LSTMs, yielding competitive performance, albeit at
the price of longer training times.
  Recently, Galke and Scherp [18] showed that at least for image recognition, a
decades-old feedforward neural network can match the performance of modern deep
learning techniques. This motivated us to try the same in the SE literature.
Specifically, in this paper, we apply feedforward networks with some
preprocessing to two analytics tasks: issue close time prediction, and
vulnerability detection. We test the hypothesis laid by Galke and Scherp [18],
that feedforward networks suffice for many analytics tasks (which we call, the
"Old but Gold" hypothesis) for these two tasks. For three out of five datasets
from these tasks, we achieve new high-water mark results (that out-perform the
prior state-of-the-art results) and for a fourth data set, Old but Gold
performed as well as the recent state of the art. Furthermore, the old but gold
results were obtained orders of magnitude faster than prior work. For example,
for issue close time, old but gold found good predictors in 90 seconds (as
opposed to the newer methods, which took 6 hours to run).
  Our results supports the "Old but Gold" hypothesis and leads to the following
recommendation: try simpler alternatives before more complex methods. At the
very least, this will produce a baseline result against which researchers can
compare some other, supposedly more sophisticated, approach. And in the best
case, they will obtain useful results that are as good as anything else, in a
small fraction of the effort.
  To support open science, all our scripts and data are available on-line at
https://github.com/fastidiouschipmunk/simple.
