  Electric boolean games are compact representations of games where the players
have qualitative objectives described by LTL formulae and have limited
resources. We study the complexity of several decision problems related to the
analysis of rationality in electric boolean games with LTL objectives. In
particular, we report that the problem of deciding whether a profile is a Nash
equilibrium in an iterated electric boolean game is no harder than in iterated
boolean games without resource bounds. We show that it is a PSPACE-complete
problem. As a corollary, we obtain that both rational elimination and rational
construction of Nash equilibria by a supervising authority are PSPACE-complete
problems.
