  Two types of approximation to the paradoxical Russell Set are presented, one
approximating it from below, one from above. It is shown that any lower
approximation gives rise to a better approximation containing it, and that any
upper approximation contains a distinct better approximation. The Russell
Paradox is then seen to be the claim that two of these processes of better
approximations stop, and at the same set. This suggests that the unrestricted
Axiom of Comprehension is, not a coherent intuition worthy of rescue from a
mysterious paradox, but simply wishful thinking, a confusion of sets as
extensional objects with classes defined by a property.
