  This paper serves as an addendum to my previously published work, which
delves into the experimentation with the Google Sycamore quantum processor
under the title "Debating the Reliability and Robustness of the Learned
Hamiltonian in the Traversable Wormhole Experiment." In the preceding
publication, I extensively discussed the quantum system functioning as a dual
to a traversable wormhole and the ongoing efforts to discover a sparse model
that accurately depicts the dynamics of this intriguing phenomenon. In this
paper, I bring to light an important insight regarding applying Nancy
Cartwright's ideas about reliability and reproducibility, which are deeply
rooted in classical scientific practices and experiments. I show that when
applied to the realm of quantum devices, such as Google's Sycamore quantum
processor and other Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices, these
well-established notions demand careful adaptation and consideration. These
systems' inherent noise and quantum nature introduce complexities that
necessitate rethinking traditional perspectives on reliability and
reproducibility. In light of these complexities, I propose the term "noisy
reliability" as a means to effectively capture the nuanced nature of assessing
the reliability of quantum devices, particularly in the presence of inherent
quantum noise. This addendum seeks to enrich the discussion by highlighting the
challenges and implications of assessing quantum device reliability, thereby
contributing to a deeper understanding of quantum experimentation and its
potential applications in various domains.
