  We compare coronagraph concepts and investigate their behavior and
suitability for planet finder projects with Extremely Large Telescopes (ELTs,
30-42 meters class telescopes). For this task, we analyze the impact of major
error sources that occur in a coronagraphic telescope (central obscuration,
secondary support, low-order segment aberrations, segment reflectivity
variations, pointing errors) for phase, amplitude and interferometric type
coronagraphs. This analysis is performed at two different levels of the
detection process: under residual phase left uncorrected by an eXtreme Adaptive
Optics system (XAO) for a large range of Strehl ratio and after a general and
simple model of speckle calibration, assuming common phase aberrations between
the XAO and the coronagraph (static phase aberrations of the instrument) and
non-common phase aberrations downstream of the coronagraph (differential
aberrations provided by the calibration unit). We derive critical parameters
that each concept will have to cope with by order of importance. We evidence
three coronagraph categories as function of the accessible angular separation
and proposed optimal one in each case. Most of the time amplitude concepts
appear more favorable and specifically, the Apodized Pupil Lyot Coronagraph
gathers the adequate characteristics to be a baseline design for ELTs.
