  The accuracy of three different sets of Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov calculations
of nuclear binding energies is systematically evaluated. To emphasize minor
fluctuations, a second order, four-point mass relation, which almost completely
eliminates smooth aspects of the binding energy, is introduced. Applying this
mass relation yields more scattered results for the calculated binding
energies. By examining the Gaussian distributions of the non-smooth aspects
which remain, structural differences can be detected between measured and
calculated binding energies. Substructures in regions of rapidly changing
deformation, specifically around $(N,Z)=(60,40)$ and $(90,60)$, are clearly
seen for the measured values, but are missing from the calculations. A similar
three-point mass relation is used to emphasize odd-even effects. A clear
decrease with neutron excess is seen continuing outside the experimentally
known region for the calculations.
