  The view exists that the Bell inequality is a mere inconsistent application
of classical concepts to a well-established quantum world. In the article,
``Nonlocality claims are inconsistent with Hilbert-space quantum mechanics''
[Phys. Rev. A, 101, 022117, (2020)], Robert B. Griffiths advocates for quantum
theory's locality. Although R. B. Griffiths presents valuable insights in favor
of quantum mechanics' local character, he argues the Bell inequality is an
inconsistent application of classical physics to quantum mechanics. We explain
why a correct assessment of the Bell inequality does not in fact conflict with
Griffiths's views of quantum locality and, on the contrary, it already
contemplates them. Hence, Bell inequality inconsistency is not necessary for
Griffiths's quantum locality to hold.
