  A fundamental task for propositional logic is to compute models of
propositional formulas. Programs developed for this task are called
satisfiability solvers. We show that transition systems introduced by
Nieuwenhuis, Oliveras, and Tinelli to model and analyze satisfiability solvers
can be adapted for solvers developed for two other propositional formalisms:
logic programming under the answer-set semantics, and the logic PC(ID). We show
that in each case the task of computing models can be seen as "satisfiability
modulo answer-set programming," where the goal is to find a model of a theory
that also is an answer set of a certain program. The unifying perspective we
develop shows, in particular, that solvers CLASP and MINISATID are closely
related despite being developed for different formalisms, one for answer-set
programming and the latter for the logic PC(ID).
