  I defend algebraicism, according to which physical fields can be understood
in terms of their structural relations without reference to a spacetime
manifold, as a genuine relationalist view against the conventional wisdom that
it is equivalent to substantivalism, according to which spacetime exists
fundamentally. I criticize the standard version of algebraicism that is
considered equivalent to substantivalism. Furthermore, I present alternative
examples of algebraicism that better implement relationalism with their
conceptual advantages over substantivalism or its standard algebraic
counterpart.
