  Learning about cause and effect is arguably the main goal in applied
econometrics. In practice, the validity of these causal inferences is
contingent on a number of critical assumptions regarding the type of data that
has been collected and the substantive knowledge that is available. For
instance, unobserved confounding factors threaten the internal validity of
estimates, data availability is often limited to non-random, selection-biased
samples, causal effects need to be learned from surrogate experiments with
imperfect compliance, and causal knowledge has to be extrapolated across
structurally heterogeneous populations. A powerful causal inference framework
is required to tackle these challenges, which plague most data analysis to
varying degrees. Building on the structural approach to causality introduced by
Haavelmo (1943) and the graph-theoretic framework proposed by Pearl (1995), the
artificial intelligence (AI) literature has developed a wide array of
techniques for causal learning that allow to leverage information from various
imperfect, heterogeneous, and biased data sources (Bareinboim and Pearl, 2016).
In this paper, we discuss recent advances in this literature that have the
potential to contribute to econometric methodology along three dimensions.
First, they provide a unified and comprehensive framework for causal inference,
in which the aforementioned problems can be addressed in full generality.
Second, due to their origin in AI, they come together with sound, efficient,
and complete algorithmic criteria for automatization of the corresponding
identification task. And third, because of the nonparametric description of
structural models that graph-theoretic approaches build on, they combine the
strengths of both structural econometrics as well as the potential outcomes
framework, and thus offer an effective middle ground between these two
literature streams.
