  Currently, the variety of expressive extensions and different semantics
created for logic programs with negation is diverse and heterogeneous, and
there is a lack of comprehensive comparative studies which map out the
multitude of perspectives in a uniform way. Most recently, however, new
methodologies have been proposed which allow one to derive uniform
characterizations of different declarative semantics for logic programs with
negation. In this paper, we study the relationship between two of these
approaches, namely the level mapping characterizations due to [Hitzler and
Wendt 2005], and the selector generated models due to [Schwarz 2004]. We will
show that the latter can be captured by means of the former, thereby supporting
the claim that level mappings provide a very flexible framework which is
applicable to very diversely defined semantics.
