  We have fossil evidence from the thermal background radiation that our
universe expanded from a considerably hotter denser state. We have a well
defined and testable description of the expansion, the relativistic
Friedmann-Lemaitre model. Its observational successes are impressive but I
think hardly enough for a convincing scientific case. The lists of
observational constraints and free hypotheses within the model have similar
lengths. The scorecard on the search for concordant measures of the mass
density parameter and the cosmological constant shows that the high density
Einstein-de Sitter model is challenged, but that we cannot choose between low
density models with and without a cosmological constant. That is, the
relativistic model is not strongly overconstrained, the usual test of a mature
theory. Work in progress will greatly improve the situation and may at last
yield a compelling test. If so, and the relativistic model survives, it will
close one line of research in cosmology: we will know the outlines of what
happened as our universe expanded and cooled from high density. It will not end
research: some of us will occupy ourselves with the details of how galaxies and
other large-scale structures came to be the way they are, others with the issue
of what our universe was doing before it was expanding. The former is being
driven by rapid observational advances. The latter is being driven mainly by
theory, but there are hints of observational guidance.
