  We present a static analysis technique for non-termination inference of logic
programs. Our framework relies on an extension of the subsumption test, where
some specific argument positions can be instantiated while others are
generalized. We give syntactic criteria to statically identify such argument
positions from the text of a program. Atomic left looping queries are generated
bottom-up from selected subsets of the binary unfoldings of the program of
interest. We propose a set of correct algorithms for automating the approach.
Then, non-termination inference is tailored to attempt proofs of optimality of
left termination conditions computed by a termination inference tool. An
experimental evaluation is reported. When termination and non-termination
analysis produce complementary results for a logic procedure, then with respect
to the leftmost selection rule and the language used to describe sets of atomic
queries, each analysis is optimal and together, they induce a characterization
of the operational behavior of the logic procedure.
