  Emergent properties have been widely adopted as a term to describe behavior
not present in smaller models but observed in larger models. Recent work
suggests that the trade-off incurred by quantization is also an emergent
property, with sharp drops in performance in models over 6B parameters. In this
work, we ask "are quantization cliffs in performance solely a factor of scale?"
Against a backdrop of increased research focus on why certain emergent
properties surface at scale, this work provides a useful counter-example. We
posit that it is possible to optimize for a quantization friendly training
recipe that suppresses large activation magnitude outliers. Here, we find that
outlier dimensions are not an inherent product of scale, but rather sensitive
to the optimization conditions present during pre-training. This both opens up
directions for more efficient quantization, and poses the question of whether
other emergent properties are inherent or can be altered and conditioned by
optimization and architecture design choices. We successfully quantize models
ranging in size from 410M to 52B with minimal degradation in performance.
