  The findings in the paper 'The quantum pigeonhole principle and the nature of
quantum correlations', (arXiv 1407.3194), by Aharonov, Colombo, Popescu,
Sabadini, Struppa and Tollaksen are scrutinized. I argue that some of the
conclusions in the paper are ambiguous in the sense that they depend on the
precise way one defines correlations, and that the 'first experiments' the
authors suggest has little if any bearing on their main theses. The
far-reaching conclusions the authors reach seems, therefore, premature.
