  `Rank and Yank' is practiced in many organizations. This paper is concerned
with the condtions for none to be whipped by `Rank and Yank' when the
evaluation data under each criterion are assumed to be ordinal rankings and the
majority rule is used. Two sufficient conditions are set forth of which the
first one formulates the alternatives indifference definition in terms of the
election matrix, while the second one specifies a certain balance in the
probabilities of alternatives being ranked at positions. In a sense, `none to
be whipped' means that the organization is of stability. Thus the second
sufficient condition indicates an intrinsic relation of balance and
organization stability. In addition, directions for future research are put
forward.
