  The emerging mass individualization in series produced road vehicles,
superseding mass customization, entails an increase in variants. The question
"How may the functional safety development effort, corresponding to the variant
numbers, be tackled while complying to the standard ISO 26262:2018?" motives
this work. The lever on containing the effort is most effective when applied in
the development life-cycle as early as possible. The initiating functional
safety artifact is the item definition. Strategic clustering of variants into a
few or even a single item-definition(s) is feasible by exploiting platform
development. Yet, the functional safety development effort for each defined
item may only be limited when basing all subsequent phases on one single
representative variant. In this work we particularly elaborate on answering the
question "Under what conditions can a representative variant be defined?",
accompanied by the notion of "How is it defined?". Therefore, we assess the ISO
26262:2018 for deriving prerequisites on a representative variant. Furthermore,
we propose a structured and efficient method to determine representative
variants given vehicle parameters and a framing context. The method is
exemplified for two easily comprehensible use-case situations in drivetrain
development. The characteristic equations may be used for future drivetrain
functional safety development.
