  Nonclassical causal modeling was developed in order to explain violations of
Bell inequalities while adhering to relativistic causal structure and
faithfulness -- that is, avoiding fine-tuned causal explanations. Recently, a
no-go theorem stronger than Bell's theorem has been derived, based on
extensions of Wigner's friend thought experiment: the Local Friendliness (LF)
no-go theorem. Here we show that the LF no-go theorem poses formidable
challenges for the field of causal modeling, even when nonclassical and/or
cyclic causal explanations are considered. We first recast the LF inequalities,
one of the key elements of the LF no-go theorem, as special cases of monogamy
relations stemming from a statistical marginal problem; we then further recast
LF inequalities as causal compatibility inequalities stemming from a
nonclassical causal marginal problem, for a causal structure implied by
well-motivated causal-metaphysical assumptions. We find that the LF
inequalities emerge from the causal modeling perspective even when allowing the
latent causes of observed events to admit post-quantum descriptions, such as
Generalised Probabilistic Theories (GPT) or even more exotic theories. We
further prove that no nonclassical causal model can explain violations of LF
inequalities without violating the No Fine-Tuning principle. Finally, we note
that these obstacles cannot be overcome even if one were to appeal to cyclic
causal models.
