  Programs that transform other programs often require access to the internal
structure of the program to be transformed. This is at odds with the usual
extensional view of functional programming, as embodied by the lambda calculus
and SK combinator calculus. The recently-developed SF combinator calculus
offers an alternative, intensional model of computation that may serve as a
foundation for developing principled languages in which to express intensional
computation, including program transformation. Until now there have been no
static analyses for reasoning about or verifying programs written in
SF-calculus. We take the first step towards remedying this by developing a
formulation of the popular control flow analysis 0CFA for SK-calculus and
extending it to support SF-calculus. We prove its correctness and demonstrate
that the analysis is invariant under the usual translation from SK-calculus
into SF-calculus.
