  In a recent paper published in PNAS authors prove that locality and free
choice are equivalent resources which need to be relaxed in order to fully
reproduce some statistics in Bell experiments (while always maintaining
realism). We explain that their assumption of free choice is simply
counterfactual definiteness or noncontextuality. Therefore the resource in Bell
experiments is contextuality and not the violations of locality and/or of free
choice. It is definitely less mind boggling conclusion because experimenters`
freedom of choice is a prerequisite of science,
