  Julien et al. have commented on two of our publications claiming that we have
made erroneous interpretations of the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and
nuclear quadrupole resonance (NQR) data. Specifically, they believe that their
model of an extended staggered moment about a Zn impurity is the only
interpretation of the data [Julien et al., Phys. Rev Lett. 84, 3422 (2000)].
Not only does their claim ignore models presented by other authors, we show
that the model of Julien et al. [Phys. Rev Lett. 84, 3422 (2000)] does not
consistently reproduce all of the NMR data.
