  Convex relaxations of AC optimal power flow (AC-OPF) problems have attracted
significant interest as in several instances they provably yield the global
optimum to the original non-convex problem. If, however, the relaxation is
inexact, the obtained solution is not AC-feasible. The quality of the obtained
solution is essential for several practical applications of AC-OPF, but
detailed analyses are lacking in existing literature. This paper aims to cover
this gap. We provide an in-depth investigation of the solution characteristics
when convex relaxations are inexact, we assess the most promising AC
feasibility recovery methods for large-scale systems, and we propose two new
metrics that lead to a better understanding of the quality of the identified
solutions. We perform a comprehensive assessment on 96 different test cases,
ranging from 14 to 3120 buses, and we show the following: (i) Despite an
optimality gap of less than 1%, several test cases still exhibit substantial
distances to both AC feasibility and local optimality and the newly proposed
metrics characterize these deviations. (ii) Penalization methods fail to
recover an AC-feasible solution in 15 out of 45 cases, and using the proposed
metrics, we show that most failed test instances exhibit substantial distances
to both AC-feasibility and local optimality. For failed test instances with
small distances, we show how our proposed metrics inform a fine-tuning of
penalty weights to obtain AC-feasible solutions. (iii) The computational
benefits of warm-starting non-convex solvers have significant variation, but a
computational speedup exists in over 75% of the cases.
