  The LOCAL model is among the main models for studying locality in the
framework of distributed network computing. This model is however subject to
pertinent criticisms, including the facts that all nodes wake up
simultaneously, perform in lock steps, and are failure-free. We show that
relaxing these hypotheses to some extent does not hurt local computing. In
particular, we show that, for any construction task $T$ associated to a locally
checkable labeling (LCL), if $T$ is solvable in $t$ rounds in the LOCAL model,
then $T$ remains solvable in $O(t)$ rounds in the asynchronous LOCAL model.
This improves the result by Casta\~neda et al. [SSS 2016], which was restricted
to 3-coloring the rings. More generally, the main contribution of this paper is
to show that, perhaps surprisingly, asynchrony and failures in the computations
do not restrict the power of the LOCAL model, as long as the communications
remain synchronous and failure-free.
