  Recent work on Bohr's reply to EPR has helped improve our understanding of
Bohr's reply, but further work is needed. In this paper I do two things towards
that end. First, I make some elementary points about EPR's argument, which help
to clear the air of some minor criticisms of Bohr's reply. Second, I argue that
Bohr's thought experiment is a reasonable realization of EPR's argument, and I
briefly suggest how to understand that experiment. I finish with a brief remark
about Bohm's version of the experiment, and its relation to Bohr's.
