  In this paper, we address the problem of defining a fixpoint semantics for
Constraint Handling Rules (CHR) that captures the behavior of both
simplification and propagation rules in a sound and complete way with respect
to their declarative semantics. Firstly, we show that the logical reading of
states with respect to a set of simplification rules can be characterized by a
least fixpoint over the transition system generated by the abstract operational
semantics of CHR. Similarly, we demonstrate that the logical reading of states
with respect to a set of propagation rules can be characterized by a greatest
fixpoint. Then, in order to take advantage of both types of rules without
losing fixpoint characterization, we present an operational semantics with
persistent. We finally establish that this semantics can be characterized by
two nested fixpoints, and we show the resulting language is an elegant
framework to program using coinductive reasoning.
