  The combination of multiple classifiers using ensemble methods is
increasingly important for making progress in a variety of difficult prediction
problems. We present a comparative analysis of several ensemble methods through
two case studies in genomics, namely the prediction of genetic interactions and
protein functions, to demonstrate their efficacy on real-world datasets and
draw useful conclusions about their behavior. These methods include simple
aggregation, meta-learning, cluster-based meta-learning, and ensemble selection
using heterogeneous classifiers trained on resampled data to improve the
diversity of their predictions. We present a detailed analysis of these methods
across 4 genomics datasets and find the best of these methods offer
statistically significant improvements over the state of the art in their
respective domains. In addition, we establish a novel connection between
ensemble selection and meta-learning, demonstrating how both of these disparate
methods establish a balance between ensemble diversity and performance.
