  Traditional Bell's argument shows that freedom of choice is inconsistent with
quantum realism if lack of signaling and sufficiently fast choices and readouts
are assumed. While no-signaling alone is a consequence of special relativity,
this is not the case of spacetime location of choice and readout. Here we
attempt to incorporate freedom of choice into quantum objective realism relying
solely on relativistic quantum field theory. We conclude that this is
impossible without breaking relativistic invariance and put forward the
possibility of signaling faster than light, which cannot be excluded if an
ultimate theory violates relativity.
