  In this paper, we address the limitations of the common data annotation and
training methods for objective single-label classification tasks. Typically,
when annotating such tasks annotators are only asked to provide a single label
for each sample and annotator disagreement is discarded when a final hard label
is decided through majority voting. We challenge this traditional approach,
acknowledging that determining the appropriate label can be difficult due to
the ambiguity and lack of context in the data samples. Rather than discarding
the information from such ambiguous annotations, our soft label method makes
use of them for training. Our findings indicate that additional annotator
information, such as confidence, secondary label and disagreement, can be used
to effectively generate soft labels. Training classifiers with these soft
labels then leads to improved performance and calibration on the hard label
test set.
