  I identify a number of errors in Richard Gill's purported refutation
(arXiv:1203.1504) of my disproof of Bell's theorem. In particular, I point out
that his central argument is based, not only on a rather trivial misreading of
my counterexample to Bell's theorem, but also on a simple oversight of a
freedom of choice in the orientation of a Clifford algebra. What is innovative
and original in my counterexample is thus mistaken for an error, at the expense
of the professed universality and generality of Bell's theorem.
