  Evaluating the computational reproducibility of data analysis pipelines has
become a critical issue. It is, however, a cumbersome process for analyses that
involve data from large populations of subjects, due to their computational and
storage requirements. We present a method to predict the computational
reproducibility of data analysis pipelines in large population studies. We
formulate the problem as a collaborative filtering process, with constraints on
the construction of the training set. We propose 6 different strategies to
build the training set, which we evaluate on 2 datasets, a synthetic one
modeling a population with a growing number of subject types, and a real one
obtained with neuroinformatics pipelines. Results show that one sampling
method, "Random File Numbers (Uniform)" is able to predict computational
reproducibility with a good accuracy. We also analyze the relevance of
including file and subject biases in the collaborative filtering model. We
conclude that the proposed method is able to speedup reproducibility
evaluations substantially, with a reduced accuracy loss.
