  We show that, provided one focuses on properly selected episodes, one can
apply to the social sciences the same observational strategy that has proved
successful in natural sciences such as astrophysics or geodynamics. For
instance, in order to probe the cohesion of a policy, one can, in different
countries, study the reactions to some huge and sudden exogenous shocks, which
we call Dirac shocks. This approach naturally leads to the notion of structural
(as opposed or complementary to temporal) forecast. Although structural
predictions are by far the most common way to test theories in the natural
sciences, they have been much less used in the social sciences. The Dirac shock
approach opens the way to testing structural predictions in the social
sciences. The examples reported here suggest that critical events are able to
reveal pre-existing ``cracks'' because they probe the social cohesion which is
an indicator and predictor of future evolution of the system, and in some cases
foreshadows a bifurcation. We complement our empirical work with numerical
simulations of the response function (``damage spreading'') to Dirac shocks in
the Sznajd model of consensus build-up. We quantify the slow relaxation of the
difference between perturbed and unperturbed systems, the conditions under
which the consensus is modified by the shock and the large variability from one
realization to another.
