  We investigate the impact of astrophysical systematics on cosmic shear
cosmological parameter constraints from the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope
Lensing Survey (CFHTLenS), and the concordance with cosmic microwave background
measurements by Planck. We present updated CFHTLenS cosmic shear tomography
measurements extended to degree scales using a covariance calibrated by a new
suite of N-body simulations. We analyze these measurements with a new model
fitting pipeline, accounting for key systematic uncertainties arising from
intrinsic galaxy alignments, baryonic effects in the nonlinear matter power
spectrum, and photometric redshift uncertainties. We examine the impact of the
systematic degrees of freedom on the cosmological parameter constraints, both
independently and jointly. When the systematic uncertainties are considered
independently, the intrinsic alignment amplitude is the only degree of freedom
that is substantially preferred by the data. When the systematic uncertainties
are considered jointly, there is no consistently strong preference in favor of
the more complex models. We quantify the level of concordance between the
CFHTLenS and Planck datasets by employing two distinct data concordance tests,
grounded in Bayesian evidence and information theory. We find that the two data
concordance tests largely agree with one another, and that the level of
concordance between the CFHTLenS and Planck datasets is sensitive to the exact
details of the systematic uncertainties included in our analysis, ranging from
decisive discordance to substantial concordance as the treatment of the
systematic uncertainties becomes more conservative. The least conservative
scenario is the one most favored by the cosmic shear data, but it is also the
one that shows the greatest degree of discordance with Planck. The data and
analysis code are public at https://github.com/sjoudaki/cfhtlens_revisited
