  Malicious adversaries can attack machine learning models to infer sensitive
information or damage the system by launching a series of evasion attacks.
Although various work addresses privacy and security concerns, they focus on
individual defenses, but in practice, models may undergo simultaneous attacks.
This study explores the combination of adversarial training and differentially
private training to defend against simultaneous attacks. While
differentially-private adversarial training, as presented in DP-Adv,
outperforms the other state-of-the-art methods in performance, it lacks formal
privacy guarantees and empirical validation. Thus, in this work, we benchmark
the performance of this technique using a membership inference attack and
empirically show that the resulting approach is as private as non-robust
private models. This work also highlights the need to explore privacy
guarantees in dynamic training paradigms.
