  We analyze the logical foundations of quantum mechanics (QM) by stressing
non-objectivity of quantum observables which is a consequence of the absence of
logical atoms in QM. We argue that the matter of quantum non-objectivity is
that, on the one hand, the formalism of QM constructed as a mathematical theory
is self-consistent, but, on the other hand, quantum phenomena as results of
experimenter's performances are not self-consistent. This self-inconsistency is
an effect of that the language of QM differs much from the language of human
performances. The first is the language of a mathematical theory which uses
some Aristotelian and Russellian assumptions (e.g., the assumption that there
are logical atoms). The second language consists of performative propositions
which are self-inconsistent only from the viewpoint of conventional
mathematical theory, but they satisfy another logic which is non-Aristotelian.
Hence, the representation of quantum reality in linguistic terms may be
different: from a mathematical theory to a logic of performative propositions.
To solve quantum self-inconsistency, we apply the formalism of non-classical
self-referent logics.
