  We introduce a new semantics for justification logic based on subset
relations. Instead of using the established and more symbolic interpretation of
justifications, we model justifications as sets of possible worlds. We
introduce a new justification logic that is sound and complete with respect to
our semantics. Moreover, we present another variant of our semantics that
corresponds to traditional justification logic.
  These types of models offer us a versatile tool to work with justifications,
e.g.~by extending them with a probability measure to capture uncertain
justifications. Following this strategy we will show that they subsume
Artemov's approach to aggregating probabilistic evidence.
