  The complete and concurrent Homestake and Kamiokande solar neutrino data sets
(including backgrounds), when compared to detailed model predictions, provide
no unambiguous indication of the solution to the solar neutrino problem. All
neutrino-based solutions, including time-varying models, provide reasonable
fits to both the 3 year concurrent data and the full 20 year data set. A simple
constant B neutrino flux reduction is ruled out at greater than the 4$\sigma$
level for both data sets. While such a flux reduction provides a marginal fit
to the unweighted averages of the concurrent data, it does not provide a good
fit to the average of the full 20 year sample. Gallium experiments may not be
able to distinguish between the currently allowed neutrino-based possibilities.
