  Lattice models, for their coarse-grained nature, are best suited for the
study of the ``designability problem'', the phenomenon in which most of the
about 16,000 proteins of known structure have their native conformations
concentrated in a relatively small number of about 500 topological classes of
conformations. Here it is shown that on a lattice the most highly designable
simulated protein structures are those that have the largest number of
surface-core switchbacks. A combination of physical, mathematical and
biological reasons that causes the phenomenon is given. By comparing the most
foldable model peptides with protein sequences in the Protein Data Bank, it is
shown that whereas different models may yield similar designabilities,
predicted foldable peptides will simulate natural proteins only when the model
incorporates the correct physics and biology, in this case if the main folding
force arises from the differing hydrophobicity of the residues, but does not
originate, say, from the steric hindrance effect caused by the differing sizes
of the residues.
