  In recent years, state-of-the-art game-playing agents often involve policies
that are trained in self-playing processes where Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS)
algorithms and trained policies iteratively improve each other. The strongest
results have been obtained when policies are trained to mimic the search
behaviour of MCTS by minimising a cross-entropy loss. Because MCTS, by design,
includes an element of exploration, policies trained in this manner are also
likely to exhibit a similar extent of exploration. In this paper, we are
interested in learning policies for a project with future goals including the
extraction of interpretable strategies, rather than state-of-the-art
game-playing performance. For these goals, we argue that such an extent of
exploration is undesirable, and we propose a novel objective function for
training policies that are not exploratory. We derive a policy gradient
expression for maximising this objective function, which can be estimated using
MCTS value estimates, rather than MCTS visit counts. We empirically evaluate
various properties of resulting policies, in a variety of board games.
