  Quantum mechanics is a theory that is as effective as it is counterintuitive.
While quantum practices operate impeccably, they compel us to embrace enigmatic
phenomena like the collapse of the state vector and non-locality, thereby
pushing us towards untenable "hypotheses non fingo" stances. However, a century
after its inception, we are presented with a promising interpretive key,
intimated by Wheeler as early as 1974. The interpretative paradoxes of this
theory might be resolved if we discern the relationship between logical
undecidability and quantum undecidability. It will be demonstrated how both are
intricately linked to an observer/observed relational issue, and how the
idiosyncratic behaviours of quantum physics can be reconciled with the
normative, following this path.
