  Valiant's (2007) model of evolvability models the evolutionary process of
acquiring useful functionality as a restricted form of learning from random
examples. Linear threshold functions and their various subclasses, such as
conjunctions and decision lists, play a fundamental role in learning theory and
hence their evolvability has been the primary focus of research on Valiant's
framework (2007). One of the main open problems regarding the model is whether
conjunctions are evolvable distribution-independently (Feldman and Valiant,
2008). We show that the answer is negative. Our proof is based on a new
combinatorial parameter of a concept class that lower-bounds the complexity of
learning from correlations.
  We contrast the lower bound with a proof that linear threshold functions
having a non-negligible margin on the data points are evolvable
distribution-independently via a simple mutation algorithm. Our algorithm
relies on a non-linear loss function being used to select the hypotheses
instead of 0-1 loss in Valiant's (2007) original definition. The proof of
evolvability requires that the loss function satisfies several mild conditions
that are, for example, satisfied by the quadratic loss function studied in
several other works (Michael, 2007; Feldman, 2009; Valiant, 2010). An important
property of our evolution algorithm is monotonicity, that is the algorithm
guarantees evolvability without any decreases in performance. Previously,
monotone evolvability was only shown for conjunctions with quadratic loss
(Feldman, 2009) or when the distribution on the domain is severely restricted
(Michael, 2007; Feldman, 2009; Kanade et al., 2010)
