  Numerical modelling of convection driven dynamos in the Boussinesq
approximation revealed fundamental characteristics of the dynamo-generated
magnetic fields and the fluid flow. Because these results were obtained for an
incompressible fluid, their validity for gas planets and stars remains to be
assessed. A common approach is to take some density stratification into account
with the so-called anelastic approximation. The validity of previous results
obtained in the Boussinesq approximation is tested for anelastic models. We
point out and explain specific differences between both types of models, in
particular with respect to the field geometry and the field strength, but we
also compare scaling laws for the velocity amplitude, the magnetic dissipation
time, and the convective heat flux. Our investigation is based on a systematic
parameter study of spherical dynamo models in the anelastic approximation. We
make use of a recently developed numerical solver and provide results for the
test cases of the anelastic dynamo benchmark. The dichotomy of dipolar and
multipolar dynamos identified in Boussinesq simulations is also present in our
sample of anelastic models. Dipolar models require that the typical length
scale of convection is an order of magnitude larger than the Rossby radius.
However, the distinction between both classes of models is somewhat less
explicit than in previous studies. This is mainly due to two reasons: we found
a number of models with a considerable equatorial dipole contribution and an
intermediate overall dipole field strength. Furthermore, a large density
stratification may hamper the generation of dipole dominated magnetic fields.
Previously proposed scaling laws, such as those for the field strength, are
similarly applicable to anelastic models. It is not clear, however, if this
consistency necessarily implies similar dynamo processes in both settings.
