  Numerous studies have revealed biases within the scientific communication
system and across all scientific fields. For example, already prominent
researchers receive disproportional credit compared to their (almost) equally
qualified colleagues -- because of their prominence. However, none of those
studies has offered a solution as to how to decrease the incidence of these
biases. In this paper I argue that by publishing anonymously, we can decrease
the incidence of inaccurate heuristics in the current scientific communication
system. Specific suggestions are made as to how to implement the changes.
