  Online social networks are the perfect test bed to better understand
large-scale human behavior in interacting contexts. Although they are broadly
used and studied, little is known about how their terms of service and posting
rules affect the way users interact and information spreads. Acknowledging the
relation between network connectivity and functionality, we compare the
robustness of two different online social platforms, Twitter and Gab, with
respect to dismantling strategies based on the recursive censor of users
characterized by social prominence (degree) or intensity of inflammatory
content (sentiment). We find that the moderated (Twitter) vs unmoderated (Gab)
character of the network is not a discriminating factor for intervention
effectiveness. We find, however, that more complex strategies based upon the
combination of topological and content features may be effective for network
dismantling. Our results provide useful indications to design better strategies
for countervailing the production and dissemination of anti-social content in
online social platforms.
