  A new quantum ontology of quantum mechanics has been proposed recently. This
ontology is based on impossible to realize measurements which need to be
performed repeatedly on the same single physical system or on the same pair of
physical systems. We agree that quantum mechanics is a contextual theory and
that the experimental contexts have to be a part of any description of quantum
phenomena but in our opinion this new ontology is neither convincing nor
useful. In particular the authors claim that their ontology explains the
peaceful coexistence between quantum mechanics and relativity in spin
polarization correlation experiments. We show that, contrary to their claim,
the authors are unable to explain why strong correlations, between the outcomes
of distant local measurements, do exist and why they preserve a condition of
parameter independence (non-signaling). Strangely enough the authors ignore
that these strong but imperfect correlations can be explained in a local and
causal way using statistical contextual interpretation of quantum mechanics
what was demonstrated in several articles.
