  Over the last decade there have been great strides made in developing
techniques to compute functions privately. In particular, Differential Privacy
gives strong promises about conclusions that can be drawn about an individual.
In contrast, various syntactic methods for providing privacy (criteria such as
kanonymity and l-diversity) have been criticized for still allowing private
information of an individual to be inferred. In this report, we consider the
ability of an attacker to use data meeting privacy definitions to build an
accurate classifier. We demonstrate that even under Differential Privacy, such
classifiers can be used to accurately infer "private" attributes in realistic
data. We compare this to similar approaches for inferencebased attacks on other
forms of anonymized data. We place these attacks on the same scale, and observe
that the accuracy of inference of private attributes for Differentially Private
data and l-diverse data can be quite similar.
