  Answer set programs in practice are often subject to change. This can lead to
inconsistencies in the modified program due to conflicts between rules which
are the results of the derivation of strongly complementary literals. To
facilitate the maintenance of consistency in answer set programs, in this paper
we continue work on a recently presented framework that implements interactive
conflict resolution by extending the bodies of conflicting rules by suitable
literals, so-called $\lambda$-extensions. More precisely, we present strategies
to choose $\lambda$-extensions that allow for resolving several conflicts at a
time in an order that aims at minimizing (cognitive) efforts. In particular, we
present a graphical representation of connections between conflicts and their
possible solutions. Such a representation can be utilized to efficiently guide
the user through the conflict resolution process by displaying conflicts and
suggesting solutions in a suitable order.
