  The field of human-computer interaction (HCI) is maturing. Systematic
reviews, a staple of many disciplines, play an important and often essential
role in how each field contributes to human knowledge. On this prospect, we
argue that our meta-level approach to research within HCI needs a revolution.
First, we echo previous calls for greater rigour in primary research reporting
with a view towards supporting knowledge synthesis in secondary research.
Second, we must decide as a community how to carry out systematic review work
in light of the many ways that knowledge is produced within HCI (rigour in
secondary research methods and epistemological inclusivity). In short, our
manifesto is this: we need to develop and make space for an inclusive but
rigorous set of standards that supports systematic review work in HCI, through
careful consideration of both primary and secondary research methods,
expectations, and infrastructure. We call for any and all fellow systematic
review-lutionaries to join us.
