  This paper collects some reflections about an apparent incongruity between
the usual (third-person) understanding of the probability of an event
calculated for an extended period of time in the future (e.g., the expected
probability of a driver to meet with a car accident in the next $M$ years) and
the subjective perception of the same probability/risk that the person involved
in that event has, instant by instant during that period of time. Similarities
with the classical Zeno's paradoxes come to mind.
