  The synthesis of classical Computational Complexity Theory with Recursive
Analysis provides a quantitative foundation to reliable numerics. Here the
operators of maximization, integration, and solving ordinary differential
equations are known to map (even high-order differentiable) polynomial-time
computable functions to instances which are `hard' for classical complexity
classes NP, #P, and CH; but, restricted to analytic functions, map
polynomial-time computable ones to polynomial-time computable ones --
non-uniformly!
  We investigate the uniform parameterized complexity of the above operators in
the setting of Weihrauch's TTE and its second-order extension due to
Kawamura&Cook (2010). That is, we explore which (both continuous and discrete,
first and second order) information and parameters on some given f is
sufficient to obtain similar data on Max(f) and int(f); and within what running
time, in terms of these parameters and the guaranteed output precision 2^(-n).
  It turns out that Gevrey's hierarchy of functions climbing from analytic to
smooth corresponds to the computational complexity of maximization growing from
polytime to NP-hard. Proof techniques involve mainly the Theory of (discrete)
Computation, Hard Analysis, and Information-Based Complexity.
