  This is a response to Barbara Fredrickson's comment [American Psychologist
68, 814-822 (2013)] on our article arXiv:1307.7006.
  We analyze critically the renewed claims made by Fredrickson (2013)
concerning positivity ratios and "flourishing", and attempt to disentangle some
conceptual confusions; we also address the alleged empirical evidence for
nonlinear effects. We conclude that there is no evidence whatsoever for the
existence of any "tipping points", and only weak evidence for the existence of
any nonlinearity of any kind. Our original concern, that the application of
advanced mathematical techniques in psychology and related disciplines may not
always be appropriate, remains undiminished.
