  In recent years, malicious information had an explosive growth in social
media, with serious social and political backlashes. Recent important studies,
featuring large-scale analyses, have produced deeper knowledge about this
phenomenon, showing that misleading information spreads faster, deeper and more
broadly than factual information on social media, where echo chambers,
algorithmic and human biases play an important role in diffusion networks.
Following these directions, we explore the possibility of classifying news
articles circulating on social media based exclusively on a topological
analysis of their diffusion networks. To this aim we collected a large dataset
of diffusion networks on Twitter pertaining to news articles published on two
distinct classes of sources, namely outlets that convey mainstream, reliable
and objective information and those that fabricate and disseminate various
kinds of misleading articles, including false news intended to harm, satire
intended to make people laugh, click-bait news that may be entirely factual or
rumors that are unproven. We carried out an extensive comparison of these
networks using several alignment-free approaches including basic network
properties, centrality measures distributions, and network distances. We
accordingly evaluated to what extent these techniques allow to discriminate
between the networks associated to the aforementioned news domains. Our results
highlight that the communities of users spreading mainstream news, compared to
those sharing misleading news, tend to shape diffusion networks with subtle yet
systematic differences which might be effectively employed to identify
misleading and harmful information.
