  The most advanced implementation of adaptive constraint processing with
Constraint Handling Rules (CHR) allows the application of intelligent search
strategies to solve Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSP). This presentation
compares an improved version of conflict-directed backjumping and two variants
of dynamic backtracking with respect to chronological backtracking on some of
the AIM instances which are a benchmark set of random 3-SAT problems. A CHR
implementation of a Boolean constraint solver combined with these different
search strategies in Java is thus being compared with a CHR implementation of
the same Boolean constraint solver combined with chronological backtracking in
SICStus Prolog. This comparison shows that the addition of ``intelligence'' to
the search process may reduce the number of search steps dramatically.
Furthermore, the runtime of their Java implementations is in most cases faster
than the implementations of chronological backtracking. More specifically,
conflict-directed backjumping is even faster than the SICStus Prolog
implementation of chronological backtracking, although our Java implementation
of CHR lacks the optimisations made in the SICStus Prolog system. To appear in
Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP).
