  This tutorial provides a worked example of using Dynamic Causal Modelling
(DCM) and Parametric Empirical Bayes (PEB) to characterise inter-subject
variability in neural circuitry (effective connectivity). This involves
specifying a hierarchical model with two or more levels. At the first level,
state space models (DCMs) are used to infer the effective connectivity that
best explains a subject's neuroimaging timeseries (e.g. fMRI, MEG, EEG).
Subject-specific connectivity parameters are then taken to the group level,
where they are modelled using a General Linear Model (GLM) that partitions
between-subject variability into designed effects and additive random effects.
The ensuing (Bayesian) hierarchical model conveys both the estimated connection
strengths and their uncertainty (i.e., posterior covariance) from the subject
to the group level; enabling hypotheses to be tested about the commonalities
and differences across subjects. This approach can also finesse parameter
estimation at the subject level, by using the group-level parameters as
empirical priors. We walk through this approach in detail, using data from a
published fMRI experiment that characterised individual differences in
hemispheric lateralization in a semantic processing task. The preliminary
subject specific DCM analysis is covered in detail in a companion paper. This
tutorial is accompanied by the example dataset and step-by-step instructions to
reproduce the analyses.
