  We like to investigate the idea of taking as non-accidental a remarkably good
agreement of our (C.D. Froggatt and myself, and also with Yasutaka Takanishi)
prediction of the Higgs mass. Our modernized most simple "multiple point
principle" prediction $129.4 \pm 2$ GeV versus the recently observed $126 \pm
1$ GeV agrees well.
  The PREdicted Higgs mass is essentially the smallest value, that would not
make our present vacuum unstable.
  There are two slightly different versions in as far as we can either use
absolute stability by the alternative vacuum being required to have higher
energy density than the present one or just metastability requiring that our
vacuum should not have decayed in the early time just after big bang (or later
if that should be easier). This is of course provided we suppose that the
Standard Model would function almost all the way up to the scale relevant for
the alternative vacuum (which as we shall see is close to the Planck energy
scale for the Higgs field expectation value).
  The principle we used to our PREdiction were the requirement of degenerate
vacua which we called "multiple point principle" and I shall seek to deliver
some arguments that this MPP is "nice" to assume, i.e. it is likely to be true.
