  In a recent paper, we vindicated a general entanglement-based witness of
non-classicality in hybrid quantum systems. Our vindication refutes a
counterexample to the witness, proposed by Hall and Reginatto. These authors
recently commented further, claiming to expose "a huge number of errors and
misconceptions" in it. However, their comment contains no refutation of our
arguments, nor does it expose any error or misconception in them. But it does
include a number of misconceptions about the witness of non-classicality. Here
we respond to those.
