  This is a response to the note criticizing my paper A New Paradox in
Superluminal Signaling. The criticism is based, among other things, on
arbitrarily postulated statement about invarience of direction of superluminal
information transfer. The analysis presented in my response shows the absence
of any grounds for such statement and confirms my original proof of the
impossibility of one-way superluminal signaling. The analysis also unveils many
other inconsistencies in the discussed note and shows that all its criticism is
unsubstantiated.
  Key words: superluminal signaling, tachyons, the information flow
