  Context: Processing Software Requirement Specifications (SRS) manually takes
a much longer time for requirement analysts in software engineering.
Researchers have been working on making an automatic approach to ease this
task. Most of the existing approaches require some intervention from an analyst
or are challenging to use. Some automatic and semi-automatic approaches were
developed based on heuristic rules or machine learning algorithms. However,
there are various constraints to the existing approaches of UML generation,
such as restriction on ambiguity, length or structure, anaphora,
incompleteness, atomicity of input text, requirements of domain ontology, etc.
Objective: This study aims to better understand the effectiveness of existing
systems and provide a conceptual framework with further improvement guidelines.
Method: We performed a systematic literature review (SLR). We conducted our
study selection into two phases and selected 70 papers. We conducted
quantitative and qualitative analyses by manually extracting information,
cross-checking, and validating our findings. Result: We described the existing
approaches and revealed the issues observed in these works. We identified and
clustered both the limitations and benefits of selected articles. Conclusion:
This research upholds the necessity of a common dataset and evaluation
framework to extend the research consistently. It also describes the
significance of natural language processing obstacles researchers face. In
addition, it creates a path forward for future research.
