  In this study, we analyze nine CMEs from the Sun to Earth as observed in both
the remote sensing and in situ data sets. To date, this is the largest study of
Earth impacting CMEs using the multi-view point remote sensing and in situ
data. However, the remote sensing and in situ data of the same CME cannot be
directly compared. Thus, we use several models to parameterize the two data
sets. With the model results, we are able to compare the arrival time, Earth
impact speed, internal magnetic field, size and orientation as derived from the
remote sensing and in situ methods. From the derived kinematics, we compare the
predicted arrival times and impact velocities with the in situ data. We find
that even with nearly continuous observations and the best available model of
the CME structure, there is still a significant error in the predicted values.
We estimate the various forces acting on the CME as predicted by three
theoretical models of CME propagation and expansion and compare these results
with the observational results. We find that the flux rope model of Chen (1989)
provides the best agreement with the observations. With the flux rope model, we
are able to predict the internal magnetic field of the CME near Earth from the
remote sensing data to an order of magnitude. Finally, we compare the size and
orientation of the CMEs as predicted from the remote sensing and in situ data.
We find very little agreement between the values derived from the two data
sets.
