  We revisit a cyclic cosmology scenario proposed in 2007 to examine whether
its hypotheses can be sustained if the underlying big rip evolution, which was
assumed there, is replaced by the recently proposed little rip. We show that
the separation into causal patches at turnaround is generally valid for a
little rip, and therefore conclude that the little rip is equally as suitable a
basis for cyclicity as is the big rip.
