  In this comment we critically review an argument against the existence of
objective physical outcomes, recently proposed by R. Healey [Foundations of
Physics, 48(11), 1568-1589]. We show that his gedankenexperiment, based on a
combination of "Wigner's friend" scenarios and Bell's inequalities, suffers
from the main criticism, that the computed correlation functions entering the
Bell's inequality are in principle experimentally inaccessible, and hence the
author's claim is not verifiable. We discuss perspectives for fixing that by
adapting the proposed protocol and show that this, however, makes Healey's
argument virtually equivalent to other previous, similar proposals that he
explicitly criticises.
