  This paper presents a pipeline with minimal human influence for scraping and
detecting bias on college newspaper archives. This paper introduces a framework
for scraping complex archive sites that automated tools fail to grab data from,
and subsequently generates a dataset of 14 student papers with 23,154 entries.
This data can also then be queried by keyword to calculate bias by comparing
the sentiment of a large language model summary to the original article. The
advantages of this approach are that it is less comparative than reconstruction
bias and requires less labelled data than generating keyword sentiment. Results
are calculated on politically charged words as well as control words to show
how conclusions can be drawn. The complete method facilitates the extraction of
nuanced insights with minimal assumptions and categorizations, paving the way
for a more objective understanding of bias within student newspaper sources.
