  The literature on Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) typically assumes that
humans take actions in order to minimize the expected value of a cost function,
i.e., that humans are risk neutral. Yet, in practice, humans are often far from
being risk neutral. To fill this gap, the objective of this paper is to devise
a framework for risk-sensitive IRL in order to explicitly account for a human's
risk sensitivity. To this end, we propose a flexible class of models based on
coherent risk measures, which allow us to capture an entire spectrum of risk
preferences from risk-neutral to worst-case. We propose efficient
non-parametric algorithms based on linear programming and semi-parametric
algorithms based on maximum likelihood for inferring a human's underlying risk
measure and cost function for a rich class of static and dynamic
decision-making settings. The resulting approach is demonstrated on a simulated
driving game with ten human participants. Our method is able to infer and mimic
a wide range of qualitatively different driving styles from highly risk-averse
to risk-neutral in a data-efficient manner. Moreover, comparisons of the
Risk-Sensitive (RS) IRL approach with a risk-neutral model show that the RS-IRL
framework more accurately captures observed participant behavior both
qualitatively and quantitatively, especially in scenarios where catastrophic
outcomes such as collisions can occur.
