  Horizontal (automatic) and vertical (control) processes have been observed
and reported for a long time in translation production. Schaeffer and Carl's
Monitor Model integrates these two processes into one framework, assuming that
priming mechanisms underlie horizontal/automatic processes, while
vertical/monitoring processes implement consciously accessible control
mechanisms. The Monitor Model has been criticized in various ways and several
misconceptions have accumulated over the past years. In this chapter, I update
the Monitor Model with additional evidence and argue that it is compatible with
an enactivist approach to cognition. I address several misconceptions related
to the Monitor Model.
