  We present a comparative evaluation of various techniques for action
recognition while keeping as many variables as possible controlled. We employ
two categories of Riemannian manifolds: symmetric positive definite matrices
and linear subspaces. For both categories we use their corresponding nearest
neighbour classifiers, kernels, and recent kernelised sparse representations.
We compare against traditional action recognition techniques based on Gaussian
mixture models and Fisher vectors (FVs). We evaluate these action recognition
techniques under ideal conditions, as well as their sensitivity in more
challenging conditions (variations in scale and translation). Despite recent
advancements for handling manifolds, manifold based techniques obtain the
lowest performance and their kernel representations are more unstable in the
presence of challenging conditions. The FV approach obtains the highest
accuracy under ideal conditions. Moreover, FV best deals with moderate scale
and translation changes.
