  With advances in deep learning, exponential data growth and increasing model
complexity, developing efficient optimization methods are attracting much
research attention. Several implementations favor the use of Conjugate Gradient
(CG) and Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) as being practical and elegant
solutions to achieve quick convergence, however, these optimization processes
also present many limitations in learning across deep learning applications.
Recent research is exploring higher-order optimization functions as better
approaches, but these present very complex computational challenges for
practical use. Comparing first and higher-order optimization functions, in this
paper, our experiments reveal that Levemberg-Marquardt (LM) significantly
supersedes optimal convergence but suffers from very large processing time
increasing the training complexity of both, classification and reinforcement
learning problems. Our experiments compare off-the-shelf optimization
functions(CG, SGD, LM and L-BFGS) in standard CIFAR, MNIST, CartPole and
FlappyBird experiments.The paper presents arguments on which optimization
functions to use and further, which functions would benefit from
parallelization efforts to improve pretraining time and learning rate
convergence.
