  In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs) have witnessed a remarkable
surge in prevalence, altering the landscape of natural language processing and
machine learning. One key factor in improving the performance of LLMs is
alignment with humans achieved with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
(RLHF), as for many LLMs such as GPT-4, Bard, etc. In addition, recent studies
are investigating the replacement of human feedback with feedback from other
LLMs named Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF). We examine the
biases that come along with evaluating LLMs with other LLMs and take a closer
look into verbosity bias -- a bias where LLMs sometimes prefer more verbose
answers even if they have similar qualities. We see that in our problem
setting, GPT-4 prefers longer answers more than humans. We also propose a
metric to measure this bias.
