  Recent experiments allowed concluding that Bell-type inequalities are indeed
violated thus it is important to understand what it means and how can we
explain the existence of strong correlations between outcomes of distant
measurements. Do we have to announce that: Einstein was wrong, Nature is
nonlocal and nonlocal correlations are produced due to the quantum magic and
emerge, somehow, from outside space time? Fortunately such conclusions are
unfounded because if supplementary parameters describing measuring instruments
are correctly incorporated in a theoretical model then Bell-type inequalities
may not be proven .We construct a simple probabilistic model explaining these
correlations in a locally causal way. In our model measurement outcomes are
neither predetermined nor produced in irreducibly random way. We explain in
detail why, contrary to the general belief; an introduction of setting
dependent parameters does not restrict experimenters' freedom of choice. Since
the violation of Bell-type inequalities does not allow concluding that Nature
is nonlocal and that quantum theory is complete thus the Bohr-Einstein quantum
debate may not be closed. The continuation of this debate is not only important
for a better understanding of Nature but also for various practical
applications of quantum phenomena.
