  This paper describes a large set of related theorem proving problems obtained
by translating theorems from the HOL4 standard library into multiple logical
formalisms. The formalisms are in higher-order logic (with and without type
variables) and first-order logic (possibly with multiple types, and possibly
with type variables). The resultant problem sets allow us to run automated
theorem provers that support different logical formats on corresponding
problems, and compare their performances. This also results in a new "grand
unified" large theory benchmark that emulates the ITP/ATP hammer setting, where
systems and metasystems can use multiple ATP formalisms in complementary ways,
and jointly learn from the accumulated knowledge.
