  We argue that the words "objectivity" and "subjectivity" in statistics
discourse are used in a mostly unhelpful way, and we propose to replace each of
them with broader collections of attributes, with objectivity replaced by
transparency, consensus, impartiality, and correspondence to observable
reality, and subjectivity replaced by awareness of multiple perspectives and
context dependence. The advantage of these reformulations is that the
replacement terms do not oppose each other. Instead of debating over whether a
given statistical method is subjective or objective (or normatively debating
the relative merits of subjectivity and objectivity in statistical practice),
we can recognize desirable attributes such as transparency and acknowledgment
of multiple perspectives as complementary goals. We demonstrate the
implications of our proposal with recent applied examples from pharmacology,
election polling, and socioeconomic stratification.
