  Are existing ways of measuring scientific quality reflecting disadvantages of
not being part of giant collaborations? How could possible discrimination be
avoided? We propose indices defined for each discipline (subfield) and which
count the plausible contributions added up by collaborators maintaining the
spirit of interdependency. Based on the growing debate about defining potential
biases and detecting unethical behavior, a standardized method to measure
contributions of the astronomical number of coauthors is introduced.
