  Behavioral cloning reduces policy learning to supervised learning by training
a discriminative model to predict expert actions given observations. Such
discriminative models are non-causal: the training procedure is unaware of the
causal structure of the interaction between the expert and the environment. We
point out that ignoring causality is particularly damaging because of the
distributional shift in imitation learning. In particular, it leads to a
counter-intuitive "causal misidentification" phenomenon: access to more
information can yield worse performance. We investigate how this problem
arises, and propose a solution to combat it through targeted
interventions---either environment interaction or expert queries---to determine
the correct causal model. We show that causal misidentification occurs in
several benchmark control domains as well as realistic driving settings, and
validate our solution against DAgger and other baselines and ablations.
