  Can normal science-in the Kuhnian sense-add something substantial to the
discussion about the measurement problem? Does an extended Wigner's-friend
Gedankenexperiment illustrate new issues? Or a new quality of known issues? Are
we led to new interpretations, new perspectives, or do we iterate the
previously known? The recent debate does, as we argue, neither constitute a
turning point in the discussion about the measurement problem nor fundamentally
challenge the legitimacy of quantum mechanics. Instead, the measurement problem
asks for a reflection on fundamental paradigms of doing physics.
