  Nowadays, it is commonly admitted that the experimental violation of Bell's
inequalities that was successfully demonstrated in the last decades by many
experimenters, are indeed the ultimate proof of quantum physics and of its
ability to describe the whole microscopic world and beyond. But the historical
and scientific story may not be envisioned so clearly: it starts with the
original paper of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) aiming at demonstrating
that the formalism of quantum theory is incomplete. It then goes through the
works of D. Bohm, to finally proceed to the famous John Bell's relationships
providing an experimental setup to solve the EPR paradox. In this communication
is proposed an alternative reading of this history, showing that modern
experiments based on correlations between light polarizations significantly
deviate from the original spirit of the EPR paper. It is concluded that current
experimental violations of Bell's inequalities cannot be considered as an
ultimate proof of the completeness of quantum physics models.
