  Understanding planet formation requires robust population studies, which are
designed to reveal trends in planet properties. In this work, we aim to
determine if different methods for selecting populations of exoplanets for
atmospheric characterization with JWST could influence population-level
inferences. We generate three hypothetical surveys of
super-Earths/sub-Neptunes, each spanning a similar radius-insolation flux
space. The survey samples are constructed based on three different selection
criteria (evenly-spaced-by-eye, binned, and a quantitative selection function).
Using an injection-recovery technique, we test how robustly individual-planet
atmospheric parameters and population-level parameters can be retrieved. We
find that all three survey designs result in equally suitable targets for
individual atmospheric characterization, but not equally suitable targets for
constraining population parameters. Only samples constructed with a
quantitative method or that are sufficiently evenly-spaced-by-eye result in
robust population parameter constraints. Furthermore, we find that the sample
with the best targets for individual atmospheric study does not necessarily
result in the best constrained population parameters. The method of sample
selection must be considered. We also find that there may be large variability
in population-level results with a sample that is small enough to fit in a
single JWST cycle ($\sim$12 planets), suggesting that the most successful
population-level analyses will be multi-cycle. Lastly, we infer that our
exploration of sample selection is limited by the small number of transiting
planets with measured masses around bright stars. Our results can guide future
development of programs that aim to determine underlying trends in exoplanet
atmospheric properties and, by extension, formation and evolution processes.
