  Goodness-of-fit statistics are used to quantitatively establish the
compatibility of CMB anisotropy predictions in a wide range of DMR-normalized,
open and spatially-flat $\Lambda$, CDM cosmogonies with the set of all
presently available small-scale CMB anisotropy detection data. Conclusions
regarding model viability depend sensitively on the prescription used to
account for the 1$\sigma$ uncertainty in the assumed value of the DMR
normalization, except for low-density, $\Omega_0 \sim 0.3$ -- 0.4, open models
which are compatible with the data for all prescriptions used. While large
baryon-density ($\Omega_B \gap 0.0175 h^{-2}$), old ($t_0 \gap 15$ -- 16 Gyr),
low-density ($\Omega_0 \sim 0.2$ -- 0.4), flat-$\Lambda$ models might be
incompatible, no model is incompatible with the data for all prescriptions. In
fact, some open models seem to fit the data better than should be expected, and
this might be an indication that some error bars are mildly overconservative.
