  By dividing potential energy landscapes into basins of attractions
surrounding minima and linking those basins that are connected by transition
state valleys, a network description of energy landscapes naturally arises.
These networks are characterized in detail for a series of small Lennard-Jones
clusters and show behaviour characteristic of small-world and scale-free
networks. However, unlike many such networks, this topology cannot reflect the
rules governing the dynamics of network growth, because they are static spatial
networks. Instead, the heterogeneity in the networks stems from differences in
the potential energy of the minima, and hence the hyperareas of their
associated basins of attraction. The low-energy minima with large basins of
attraction act as hubs in the network.Comparisons to randomized networks with
the same degree distribution reveals structuring in the networks that reflects
their spatial embedding.
