  We study the long-time error behavior of correction procedure via
reconstruction / flux reconstruction (CPR/FR) methods for linear hyperbolic
conservation laws. We show that not only the choice of the numerical flux
(upwind or central) affects the growth rate and asymptotic value of the error,
but that the selection of bases (Gau{\ss}-Lobatto or Gau{\ss}-Legendre) is even
more important. Using a Gau{\ss}-Legendre basis, the error reaches the
asymptotic value faster and to a lower value than when using a Gau{\ss}-Lobatto
basis. Also, the differences in the error caused by the numerical flux are not
essential for low resolution computations in the Gau{\ss}-Legendre case. This
behavior is better seen on a particular FR scheme which has a strong connection
with the discontinuous Galerkin framework but holds also for other flux
reconstruction schemes with low order resolution computations.
