  The development of robotics and AI agents has enabled their wider usage in
human surroundings. AI agents are more trusted to make increasingly important
decisions with potentially critical outcomes. It is essential to consider the
ethical consequences of the decisions made by these systems. In this paper, we
present how contrastive explanations can be used for comparing the ethics of
plans. We build upon an existing ethical framework to allow users to make
suggestions to plans and receive contrastive explanations.
