  By simulating four quantum key distribution (QKD) experiments and analyzing
one decoy-state QKD experiment, we compare two data post-processing schemes
based on security against individual attack by L\"{u}tkenhaus, and
unconditional security analysis by Gottesman-Lo-L\"{u}tkenhaus-Preskill. Our
results show that these two schemes yield close performances. Since the Holy
Grail of QKD is its unconditional security, we conclude that one is better off
considering unconditional security, rather than restricting to individual
attacks.
