  Using the most recent releases of WISE and Planck data, we perform updated
measurements of the bias and typical dark matter halo mass of infrared-selected
obscured and unobscured quasars, using the angular autocorrelation function and
cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing cross-correlations. Since our recent
work of this kind, the WISE Allwise catalogue was released with improved
photometry, and the Planck mission was completed and released improved
products. These new data provide a more reliable measurement of the quasar bias
and provide an opportunity to explore the role of changing survey pipelines in
results downstream. We present a comparison of IR color-selected quasars, split
into obscured and unobscured populations based on optical-IR colors, selected
from two versions of the WISE data. Which combination of data is used impacts
the final results, particularly for obscured quasars, both because of
mitigation of some systematics and because the newer catalogue provides a
slightly different sample. We show that Allwise data is superior in several
ways, though there may be some systematic trends with Moon contamination that
were not present in the previous catalogue. We opt currently for the most
conservative sample that meet our selection criteria in both the previous and
new WISE catalogues. We measure a higher bias and halo mass for obscured
quasars ($b_{\textrm{obsc}} \sim 2.1$, $b_{\textrm{unob}} \sim 1.8$) --- at
odds with simple orientation models --- but at a reduced significance
($\sim$1.5$\sigma$) as compared to our work with previous survey data.
