  In this extended abstract, we carefully examine a purported counterexample to
a postulate of iterated belief revision. We suggest that the example is better
seen as a failure to apply the theory of belief revision in sufficient detail.
The main contribution is conceptual aiming at the literature on the
philosophical foundations of the AGM theory of belief revision [1]. Our
discussion is centered around the observation that it is often unclear whether
a specific example is a "genuine" counterexample to an abstract theory or a
misapplication of that theory to a concrete case.
