  Current science communication has a number of drawbacks and bottlenecks which
have been subject of discussion lately: Among others, the rising number of
published articles makes it nearly impossible to get an overview of the state
of the art in a certain field, or reproducibility is hampered by fixed-length,
document-based publications which normally cannot cover all details of a
research work. Recently, several initiatives have proposed knowledge graphs
(KGs) for organising scientific information as a solution to many of the
current issues. The focus of these proposals is, however, usually restricted to
very specific use cases. In this paper, we aim to transcend this limited
perspective by presenting a comprehensive analysis of requirements for an Open
Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) by (a) collecting daily core tasks of a
scientist, (b) establishing their consequential requirements for a KG-based
system, (c) identifying overlaps and specificities, and their coverage in
current solutions. As a result, we map necessary and desirable requirements for
successful KG-based science communication, derive implications and outline
possible solutions.
