  Exploration-exploitation of functions, that is learning and optimizing a
mapping between inputs and expected outputs, is ubiquitous to many real world
situations. These situations sometimes require us to avoid certain outcomes at
all cost, for example because they are poisonous, harmful, or otherwise
dangerous. We test participants' behavior in scenarios in which they have to
find the optimum of a function while at the same time avoid outputs below a
certain threshold. In two experiments, we find that Safe-Optimization, a
Gaussian Process-based exploration-exploitation algorithm, describes
participants' behavior well and that participants seem to care firstly whether
a point is safe and then try to pick the optimal point from all such safe
points. This means that their trade-off between exploration and exploitation
can be seen as an intelligent, approximate, and homeostasis-driven strategy.
