  The Italian National Scientific Qualification (ASN) was introduced in 2010 as
part of a major reform of the national university system. Under the new
regulation, the scientific qualification for a specific role (associate or full
professor) and field of study is required to apply to a permanent professor
position. The ASN is peculiar since it makes use of bibliometric indicators
with associated thresholds as one of the parameters used to assess applicants.
Overall, more than 59000 applications were submitted, and the results have been
made publicly available for a short period of time, including the values of the
quantitative indicators for each applicant. The availability of this wealth of
information provides an opportunity to draw a fairly detailed picture of a
nation-wide evaluation exercise, and to study the impact of the bibliometric
indicators on the qualification results. In this paper we provide a first
account of the Italian ASN from a quantitative point of view. We show that
significant differences exist among scientific disciplines, in particular with
respect to the fraction of qualified applicants, that can not be easily
explained. Furthermore, we describe some issues related to the definition and
use of the bibliometric indicators and thresholds. Our analysis aims at drawing
attention to potential problems that should be addressed by decision-makers in
future ASN rounds.
