  We show that in language learning, contrary to received wisdom, keeping
exceptional training instances in memory can be beneficial for generalization
accuracy. We investigate this phenomenon empirically on a selection of
benchmark natural language processing tasks: grapheme-to-phoneme conversion,
part-of-speech tagging, prepositional-phrase attachment, and base noun phrase
chunking. In a first series of experiments we combine memory-based learning
with training set editing techniques, in which instances are edited based on
their typicality and class prediction strength. Results show that editing
exceptional instances (with low typicality or low class prediction strength)
tends to harm generalization accuracy. In a second series of experiments we
compare memory-based learning and decision-tree learning methods on the same
selection of tasks, and find that decision-tree learning often performs worse
than memory-based learning. Moreover, the decrease in performance can be linked
to the degree of abstraction from exceptions (i.e., pruning or eagerness). We
provide explanations for both results in terms of the properties of the natural
language processing tasks and the learning algorithms.
