  In this comment paper we present two misconceptions found in paper of
Nahimovs et al. \emph{On the probability of finding marked connected components
using quantum walks}. First, we show that the Theorem 2 (sufficient and
necessary condition for a state to be stationary) is incomplete -- it works
only if unmarked vertices form a single connected component. Second, we correct
derivation of \emph{a} coefficient in the Theorem 3 (lower bound on the
probability) and show how to upper bound value of \emph{a}.
