  In a recent paper published in Ecosphere, their authors suggest that
extending the logistic growth model in its usual r - K parametrization to a
multi-patch environment results in undesirable properties, that were referred
to as the "perfect mixing paradox". This led the authors to recommend using the
Verhulst r - {\alpha} parametrization of the logistic model instead and
abandoning the term "carrying capacity" in the context of population dynamics.
In this study we show that the use of the logistic equation in its traditional
r - K parametrization is appropriate for representing the dynamics of
populations in a simple spatial context with passive migration among patches.
Furthermore, we show that the conclusions of the mentioned paper depend on the
specific functional form for migration rates used for their analyses. In
addition, we suggest that their specific migration model was not the best
choice since biologically realistic options exist. Moreover, these alternatives
require the same number of parameters. The model we present here is free of the
paradoxical behaviors presented previously. This allows us to conclude that the
logistic growth in its usual r - K parametrization is useful in a spatial
context if extended appropriately to a multi-patch scenario and consequently
there are no reasons to abandon the concept of carrying capacity. Ecologists
should pay great attention when using models in scenarios that are more complex
or just different from the ones for which the models were created.
