  Morphosyntactic lexicons and word vector representations have both proven
useful for improving the accuracy of statistical part-of-speech taggers. Here
we compare the performances of four systems on datasets covering 16 languages,
two of these systems being feature-based (MEMMs and CRFs) and two of them being
neural-based (bi-LSTMs). We show that, on average, all four approaches perform
similarly and reach state-of-the-art results. Yet better performances are
obtained with our feature-based models on lexically richer datasets (e.g. for
morphologically rich languages), whereas neural-based results are higher on
datasets with less lexical variability (e.g. for English). These conclusions
hold in particular for the MEMM models relying on our system MElt, which
benefited from newly designed features. This shows that, under certain
conditions, feature-based approaches enriched with morphosyntactic lexicons are
competitive with respect to neural methods.
