  Large language model evaluation plays a pivotal role in the enhancement of
its capacity. Previously, numerous methods for evaluating large language models
have been proposed in this area. Despite their effectiveness, these existing
works mainly focus on assessing objective questions, overlooking the capability
to evaluate subjective questions which is extremely common for large language
models. Additionally, these methods predominantly utilize centralized datasets
for evaluation, with question banks concentrated within the evaluation
platforms themselves. Moreover, the evaluation processes employed by these
platforms often overlook personalized factors, neglecting to consider the
individual characteristics of both the evaluators and the models being
evaluated. To address these limitations, we propose a novel anonymous
crowd-sourcing evaluation platform, BingJian, for large language models that
employs a competitive scoring mechanism where users participate in ranking
models based on their performance. This platform stands out not only for its
support of centralized evaluations to assess the general capabilities of models
but also for offering an open evaluation gateway. Through this gateway, users
have the opportunity to submit their questions, testing the models on a
personalized and potentially broader range of capabilities. Furthermore, our
platform introduces personalized evaluation scenarios, leveraging various forms
of human-computer interaction to assess large language models in a manner that
accounts for individual user preferences and contexts. The demonstration of
BingJian can be accessed at https://github.com/Mingyue-Cheng/Bingjian.
