  We apply ideas from abstract argumentation theory to study cooperative game
theory. Building on Dung's results in his seminal paper, we further the
correspondence between Dung's four argumentation semantics and solution
concepts in cooperative game theory by showing that complete extensions (the
grounded extension) correspond to Roth's subsolutions (respectively, the
supercore). We then investigate the relationship between well-founded
argumentation frameworks and convex games, where in each case the semantics
(respectively, solution concepts) coincide; we prove that three-player convex
games do not in general have well-founded argumentation frameworks.
