  We present a new model-independent method of comparison of NIR visibility
data of YSOs. The method is based on scaling the measured baseline with the
YSO's distance and luminosity, which removes the dependence of visibility on
these two variables. We use this method to compare all available NIR visibility
data and demonstrate that it distinguishes YSOs of luminosity >1000L_sun
(low-L) from YSOs of <1000L_sun (high-L). This confirms earlier suggestions,
based on fits of image models to the visibility data, for the difference
between the NIR sizes of these two luminosity groups. When plotted against the
``scaled'' baseline, the visibility creates the following data clusters: low-L
Herbig Ae/Be stars, T Tauri stars, and high-L Herbig Be stars. The T Tau
cluster is similar to the low-L Herbig Ae/Be cluster, which has ~7 times
smaller ``scaled'' baselines than the high-L Herbig Be cluster. We model the
shape and size of clusters with different image models and find that low-L
Herbig stars are the best explained by the uniform brightness ring and the halo
model, T Tauri stars with the halo model, and high-L Herbig stars with the
accretion disk model. However, the plausibility of each model is not well
established. Therefore, we try to build a descriptive model of the
circumstellar environment consistent with various observed properties of YSOs.
We argue that low-L YSOs have optically thick disks with the optically thin
inner dust sublimation cavity and an optically thin dusty outflow above the
inner disk regions. High-L YSOs have optically thick accretion disks with high
accretion rates enabling gas to dominate the NIR emission over dust. Although
observations would favor such a description of YSOs, the required dust
distribution is not supported by our current understanding of dust dynamics.
