  Generative models can produce impressively realistic images. This paper
demonstrates that generated images have geometric features different from those
of real images. We build a set of collections of generated images, prequalified
to fool simple, signal-based classifiers into believing they are real. We then
show that prequalified generated images can be identified reliably by
classifiers that only look at geometric properties. We use three such
classifiers. All three classifiers are denied access to image pixels, and look
only at derived geometric features. The first classifier looks at the
perspective field of the image, the second looks at lines detected in the
image, and the third looks at relations between detected objects and shadows.
Our procedure detects generated images more reliably than SOTA local signal
based detectors, for images from a number of distinct generators. Saliency maps
suggest that the classifiers can identify geometric problems reliably. We
conclude that current generators cannot reliably reproduce geometric properties
of real images.
