  We reply to the critique of our results raised by Aleiner, Altshuler and
Gershenzon (AAG) in cond-mat/9808078 and cond-mat/9808053. We demonstrate that
our path integral analysis fully reproduces the results of AAG if analyzed on a
perturbative level. This should settle the issue of "missing diagrams" in our
calculation. We, furthermore, demonstrate that our approach allows us to
proceed beyond the Golden-rule-type perturbation theory employed by AAG. This
explains the difference between our and AAG's results. We also comment on the
comparison of our results with the experiments presented by AAG.
