  The Comment of A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari (cond-mat/0610113) on our article
(cond-mat/0609285) is based on misunderstandings of this article as well as on
unfounded implicit assumptions. We clarify here the controversial points and
show that, contrary to what is asserted by these authors, our paper is free of
any contradiction and agrees with all well-established theoretical and
experimental results. Also, we maintain that our work reveals pathologies in
the (treatment of) perturbative approaches performed at fixed dimensions. In
particular, we emphasize that the perturbative approaches to frustrated magnets
performed either within the minimal substraction scheme without
epsilon-expansion or in the massive scheme at zero momentum exhibit spurious
fixed points and, thus, do not describe correctly the behaviour of these
systems in three dimensions.
