  This paper studies the problem of inferring a global preference based on the
partial rankings provided by many users over different subsets of items
according to the Plackett-Luce model. A question of particular interest is how
to optimally assign items to users for ranking and how many item assignments
are needed to achieve a target estimation error. For a given assignment of
items to users, we first derive an oracle lower bound of the estimation error
that holds even for the more general Thurstone models. Then we show that the
Cram\'er-Rao lower bound and our upper bounds inversely depend on the spectral
gap of the Laplacian of an appropriately defined comparison graph. When the
system is allowed to choose the item assignment, we propose a random assignment
scheme. Our oracle lower bound and upper bounds imply that it is
minimax-optimal up to a logarithmic factor among all assignment schemes and the
lower bound can be achieved by the maximum likelihood estimator as well as
popular rank-breaking schemes that decompose partial rankings into pairwise
comparisons. The numerical experiments corroborate our theoretical findings.
