  We derive generalization bounds for learning algorithms based on their
robustness: the property that if a testing sample is "similar" to a training
sample, then the testing error is close to the training error. This provides a
novel approach, different from the complexity or stability arguments, to study
generalization of learning algorithms. We further show that a weak notion of
robustness is both sufficient and necessary for generalizability, which implies
that robustness is a fundamental property for learning algorithms to work.
