  Since the result of the 2016 referendum, Brexit has been an unpredictable
democratic adventure, the finale of which remains unclear. This year, in the
final days of March, parliamentarians seized control of the order paper from
the Government and held their own indicative votes in an attempt to break the
deadlock. In this paper we analyse the results of this unusual cardinal ballot.
We express the various motions in terms of `how much Brexit' they deliver, and
employ Monte Carlo in an attempt to determine this from the data. We find
solutions which reproduce our intuitive understanding of the debate. Finally,
we construct hypothetical ordinal ballots for the various Brexit scenarios,
using three different processes. The results suggest that the Government would
be more successful taking a softer position, and we quantify this.
Additionally, there is some discussion of how tactical voting might manifest
itself in the event of such an exercise.
