  In a recent paper, Rovelli responds to our critical assessment of Relational
Quantum Mechanics (RQM). His main argument is that our assessment lacks merit,
because we fail to understand, or cope with, the premises of his theory;
instead, he argues, we judge his proposal, blinded by the preconceptions
inherent to ``our camp''. Here, we explicitly show that our assessment judges
RQM on its own terms, together with the basic requirements of precision,
clarity, logical soundness and empirical suitability. Under those
circumstances, we prove false Rovelli's claim that RQM provides a satisfactory,
realistic, non-solipsistic description of the world. Moreover, his reply serves
us to further exhibit the serious problems of the RQM proposal, as well as the
failures of its author to understanding the basic conceptual difficulties of
quantum theory.
