  Inspired by ideas taken from the machine learning literature, new
regularization techniques have been recently introduced in linear system
identification. In particular, all the adopted estimators solve a regularized
least squares problem, differing in the nature of the penalty term assigned to
the impulse response. Popular choices include atomic and nuclear norms (applied
to Hankel matrices) as well as norms induced by the so called stable spline
kernels. In this paper, a comparative study of estimators based on these
different types of regularizers is reported. Our findings reveal that stable
spline kernels outperform approaches based on atomic and nuclear norms since
they suitably embed information on impulse response stability and smoothness.
This point is illustrated using the Bayesian interpretation of regularization.
We also design a new class of regularizers defined by "integral" versions of
stable spline/TC kernels. Under quite realistic experimental conditions, the
new estimators outperform classical prediction error methods also when the
latter are equipped with an oracle for model order selection.
