  Datasets play an important role in the advancement of software tools and
facilitate their evaluation. BugSwarm is an infrastructure to automatically
create a large dataset of real-world reproducible failures and fixes. In this
paper, we respond to Durieux and Abreu's critical review of the BugSwarm
dataset, referred to in this paper as CriticalReview. We replicate
CriticalReview's study and find several incorrect claims and assumptions about
the BugSwarm dataset. We discuss these incorrect claims and other contributions
listed by CriticalReview. Finally, we discuss general misconceptions about
BugSwarm, and our vision for the use of the infrastructure and dataset.
