  In this paper we provide a broad benchmarking of recent genetic programming
approaches to symbolic regression in the context of state of the art machine
learning approaches. We use a set of nearly 100 regression benchmark problems
culled from open source repositories across the web. We conduct a rigorous
benchmarking of four recent symbolic regression approaches as well as nine
machine learning approaches from scikit-learn. The results suggest that
symbolic regression performs strongly compared to state-of-the-art gradient
boosting algorithms, although in terms of running times is among the slowest of
the available methodologies. We discuss the results in detail and point to
future research directions that may allow symbolic regression to gain wider
adoption in the machine learning community.
