  Many important forms of data are stored digitally in XML format. Errors can
occur in the textual content of the data in the fields of the XML. Fixing these
errors manually is time-consuming and expensive, especially for large amounts
of data. There is increasing interest in the research, development, and use of
automated techniques for assisting with data cleaning. Electronic dictionaries
are an important form of data frequently stored in XML format that frequently
have errors introduced through a mixture of manual typographical entry errors
and optical character recognition errors. In this paper we describe methods for
flagging statistical anomalies as likely errors in electronic dictionaries
stored in XML format. We describe six systems based on different sources of
information. The systems detect errors using various signals in the data
including uncommon characters, text length, character-based language models,
word-based language models, tied-field length ratios, and tied-field
transliteration models. Four of the systems detect errors based on expectations
automatically inferred from content within elements of a single field type. We
call these single-field systems. Two of the systems detect errors based on
correspondence expectations automatically inferred from content within elements
of multiple related field types. We call these tied-field systems. For each
system, we provide an intuitive analysis of the type of error that it is
successful at detecting. Finally, we describe two larger-scale evaluations
using crowdsourcing with Amazon's Mechanical Turk platform and using the
annotations of a domain expert. The evaluations consistently show that the
systems are useful for improving the efficiency with which errors in XML
electronic dictionaries can be detected.
