  We re-examine the respective roles played by supernovae (SNe) Types Ia and II
in enriching the intracluster medium (ICM) of galaxy clusters, in light of the
recent downward shift of the ASCA abundance ratios of alpha-elements to iron
favoured by Ishimaru & Arimoto (1997, PASJ, 49, 1). Because of this shift,
Ishimaru & Arimoto conclude that >50% of the ICM iron must have originated from
within Type Ia SNe progenitors. A point not appreciated in their study, nor in
most previous analyses, is the crucial dependence of such a conclusion upon the
adopted massive star physics. Employing several alternative Type II SN yield
compilations, we demonstrate how uncertainties in the treatment of convection
and mass-loss can radically alter our perception of the relative importance of
Type Ia and II SNe as ICM polluters. If mass-loss of the form favoured by
Maeder (1992, A&A, 264, 105) or convection of the form favoured by Arnett
(1996, Supernovae and Nucleosynthesis) is assumed, the effect upon the oxygen
yields would lead us to conclude that Type Ia SNe play no part in polluting the
ICM, in contradiction with Ishimaru & Arimoto. Apparent dichotomies still exist
(e.g. the mean ICM neon-to-iron ratio implies a 100% Type II Fe origin, while
the mean sulphur ratio indicates a 100% Type Ia origin) that cannot be
reconciled with the currently available yield tables.
