  We study the following multiagent variant of the knapsack problem. We are
given a set of items, a set of voters, and a value of the budget; each item is
endowed with a cost and each voter assigns to each item a certain value. The
goal is to select a subset of items with the total cost not exceeding the
budget, in a way that is consistent with the voters' preferences. Since the
preferences of the voters over the items can vary significantly, we need a way
of aggregating these preferences, in order to select the socially best valid
knapsack. We study three approaches to aggregating voters' preferences, which
are motivated by the literature on multiwinner elections and fair allocation.
This way we introduce the concepts of individually best, diverse, and fair
knapsack. We study the computational complexity (including parameterized
complexity, and complexity under restricted domains) of the aforementioned
multiagent variants of knapsack.
