  This paper investigates the effects of observing windows on detecting
transiting planets by calculating the fraction of planets with a given period
that have zero, one (single), two (double), or $\ge$3 (multiple) transits
occurring while observations are being taken. We also investigate the effects
of collaboration by performing the same calculations with combined observing
times from two wide-field transit survey groups. For a representative field of
the 2004 observing season, both XO and SuperWASP experienced an increase in
single and double transit events by up to 20-40% for planets with periods 14 <
P < 150 days when collaborating by sharing data. For the XO Project using its
data alone, between 20-40% of planets with periods 14-150 days should have been
observed at least once. For the SuperWASP Project, 50-90% of planets with
periods between 14-150 days should have been observed at least once. If XO and
SuperWASP combined their observations, 50-100% of planets with periods less
than 20 days should be observed three or more times. We find that in general
wide-field transit surveys have selected appropriate observing strategies to
observe a significant fraction of transiting giant planets with semimajor axes
larger than the Hot Jupiter regime. The actual number of intermediate-period
transiting planets that are detected depends upon their true semimajor axis
distribution and the signal-to-noise of the data.
