  We address points recently discussed in Georgoulis (2011) in reference to
Leka et al. (2009b). Most importantly, we find that the results of Georgoulis
(2011) support a conclusion of Leka et al. (2009b): that limited spatial
resolution and the presence of unresolved magnetic structures can challenge
ambiguity- resolution algorithms. Moreover, the findings of both Metcalf et al.
(2006) and Leka et al. (2009b) are confirmed in Georgoulis (2011): a method's
performance can be diminished when the observed field fails to conform to that
method's assumptions. The implication of boundaries in models of solar magnetic
structures is discussed; we confirm that the distribution of the field
components in the model used in Leka et al. (2009b) is closer to what is
observed on the Sun than what is proposed in Georgoulis (2011). It is also
shown that method does matter with regards to simulating limited spatial
resolution and avoiding an inadvertent introduction of bias. Finally, the
assignment of categories to data- analysis algorithms is revisited; we argue
that assignments are only useful and elucidating when used appropriately.
