  The rapidly growing number of large network analysis problems has led to the
emergence of many parallel and distributed graph processing systems---one
survey in 2014 identified over 80. Since then, the landscape has evolved; some
packages have become inactive while more are being developed. Determining the
best approach for a given problem is infeasible for most developers. To enable
easy, rigorous, and repeatable comparison of the capabilities of such systems,
we present an approach and associated software for analyzing the performance
and scalability of parallel, open-source graph libraries. We demonstrate our
approach on five graph processing packages: GraphMat, the Graph500, the Graph
Algorithm Platform Benchmark Suite, GraphBIG, and PowerGraph using synthetic
and real-world datasets. We examine previously overlooked aspects of parallel
graph processing performance such as phases of execution and energy usage for
three algorithms: breadth first search, single source shortest paths, and
PageRank and compare our results to Graphalytics.
