  Incorporating contrastive learning objectives in sentence representation
learning (SRL) has yielded significant improvements on many sentence-level NLP
tasks. However, it is not well understood why contrastive learning works for
learning sentence-level semantics. In this paper, we aim to help guide future
designs of sentence representation learning methods by taking a closer look at
contrastive SRL through the lens of isotropy, contextualization and learning
dynamics. We interpret its successes through the geometry of the representation
shifts and show that contrastive learning brings isotropy, and drives high
intra-sentence similarity: when in the same sentence, tokens converge to
similar positions in the semantic space. We also find that what we formalize as
"spurious contextualization" is mitigated for semantically meaningful tokens,
while augmented for functional ones. We find that the embedding space is
directed towards the origin during training, with more areas now better
defined. We ablate these findings by observing the learning dynamics with
different training temperatures, batch sizes and pooling methods.
