  Models of physical systems are used to explain and predict experimental
results and observations. The Modeling Framework for Experimental Physics
describes the process by which physicists revise their models to account for
the newly acquired observations, or change their apparatus to better represent
their models when they encounter discrepancies between actual and expected
behavior of a system. While modeling is a nationally recognized learning
outcome for undergraduate physics lab courses, no assessments of students'
model-based reasoning exist for upper-division labs. As part of a larger effort
to create two assessments of students' modeling abilities, we used the Modeling
Framework to develop and code think-aloud problem-solving activities centered
on investigating an inverting amplifier circuit. This study is the second phase
of a multiphase assessment instrument development process. Here, we focus on
characterizing the range of modeling pathways students employ while
interpreting the output signal of a circuit functioning far outside its
recommended operation range. We end by discussing four outcomes of this work:
(1) Students engaged in all modeling subtasks, and they spent the most time
making measurements, making comparisons, and enacting revisions; (2) Each
subtask occurred in close temporal proximity to all over subtasks; (3)
Sometimes, students propose causes that do not follow logically from observed
discrepancies; (4) Similarly, students often rely on their experiential
knowledge and enact revisions that do not follow logically from articulated
proposed causes.
