  We consider the classic veto bargaining model but allow the agenda setter to
engage in persuasion to convince the veto player to approve her proposal. We
fully characterize the optimal proposal and experiment when Vetoer has
quadratic loss, and show that the proposer-optimal can be achieved either by
providing no information or with a simple binary experiment. Proposer chooses
to reveal partial information when there is sufficient expected misalignment
with Vetoer. In this case the opportunity to engage in persuasion strictly
benefits Proposer and increases the scope to exercise agenda power.
