  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a groundbreaking technology with
their unparalleled text generation capabilities across various applications.
Nevertheless, concerns persist regarding the accuracy and appropriateness of
their generated content. A contemporary methodology, self-correction, has been
proposed as a remedy to these issues. Building upon this premise, this paper
critically examines the role and efficacy of self-correction within LLMs,
shedding light on its true potential and limitations. Central to our
investigation is the notion of intrinsic self-correction, whereby an LLM
attempts to correct its initial responses based solely on its inherent
capabilities, without the crutch of external feedback. In the context of
reasoning, our research indicates that LLMs struggle to self-correct their
responses without external feedback, and at times, their performance even
degrades after self-correction. Drawing from these insights, we offer
suggestions for future research and practical applications in this field.
