  In this paper two different approaches to unification will be compared,
Relational Blockworld (RBW) and Hiley's implicate order. Both approaches are
monistic in that they attempt to derive matter and spacetime geometry 'at once'
in an interdependent and background independent fashion from something
underneath both quantum theory and relativity. Hiley's monism resides in the
implicate order via Clifford algebras and is based on process as fundamental
while RBW's monism resides in spacetimematter via path integrals over graphs
whereby space, time and matter are co-constructed per a global constraint
equation. RBW's monism therefore resides in being (relational blockworld) while
that of Hiley's resides in becoming (elementary processes). Regarding the
derivation of quantum theory and relativity, the promises and pitfalls of both
approaches will be elaborated. Finally, special attention will be paid as to
how Hiley's process account might avoid the blockworld implications of
relativity and the frozen time problem of canonical quantum gravity.
