  We report laboratory results of a coronagraphic test bench to assess the
intensity reduction differences between a "Gaussian" tapered focal plane
coronagraphic mask and a classical hard-edged "Top Hat" function mask at
Extreme Adaptive Optics (ExAO) Strehl ratios of ~94%. However, unlike a
traditional coronagraph design, we insert a reflective focal plane mask at 45
degree to the optical axis. We also used an intermediate secondary mask
("Mask_2") before a final image in order to block additional mask-edge
diffracted light. The test bench simulates the 8.1m Gemini North telescope. It
includes one spider vane, different mask radii (r= 1.9, 3.7, 7.4 lambda/D) and
two types of reflective focal plane masks (hard-edged "Top Hat" and "Gaussian"
tapered profiles). In order to investigate the relative performance of these
competing coronagraphic designs with regard to extra-solar planet detection
sensitivity, we utilize the simulation of realistic extra-solar planet
populations (Nielson et al. 2006). With an appropriate translation of our
laboratory results to expected telescope performance, a "Gaussian" tapered mask
radius of 3.7 lambda/D with an additional mask ("Mask_2") performs best
(highest planet detection sensitivity). For a full survey with this optimal
design, the simulation predicts ~30% more planets detected compared to a
similar sized "Top Hat" function mask with "Mask_2." Using the best design, the
point contrast ratio between the stellar PSF peak and the coronagraphic PSF at
10 lambda/D (0.4" in H band if D = 8.1m) is ~10 times higher than a classical
Lyot "Top Hat" coronagraph. Hence, we find a Gaussian apodized mask with an
additional blocking mask is a superior (~10x higher contrast) than use of a
classical Lyot coronagraph for ExAO-like Strehls.
