  We provide two main contributions in PAC-Bayesian theory for domain
adaptation where the objective is to learn, from a source distribution, a
well-performing majority vote on a different, but related, target distribution.
Firstly, we propose an improvement of the previous approach we proposed in
Germain et al. (2013), which relies on a novel distribution pseudodistance
based on a disagreement averaging, allowing us to derive a new tighter domain
adaptation bound for the target risk. While this bound stands in the spirit of
common domain adaptation works, we derive a second bound (introduced in Germain
et al., 2016) that brings a new perspective on domain adaptation by deriving an
upper bound on the target risk where the distributions' divergence-expressed as
a ratio-controls the trade-off between a source error measure and the target
voters' disagreement. We discuss and compare both results, from which we obtain
PAC-Bayesian generalization bounds. Furthermore, from the PAC-Bayesian
specialization to linear classifiers, we infer two learning algorithms, and we
evaluate them on real data.
