  In many real world situations, like minor traffic offenses in big cities, a
central authority is tasked with periodic administering punishments to a large
number of individuals. Common practice is to give each individual a chance to
suffer a smaller fine and be guaranteed to avoid the legal process with
probable considerably larger punishment. However, thanks to the large number of
offenders and a limited capacity of the central authority, the individual risk
is typically small and a rational individual will not choose to pay the fine.
Here we show that if the central authority processes the offenders in a
publicly known order, it properly incentives the offenders to pay the fine. We
show analytically and on realistic experiments that our mechanism promotes
non-cooperation and incentives individuals to pay. Moreover, the same holds for
an arbitrary coalition. We quantify the expected total payment the central
authority receives, and show it increases considerably.
