  Color maps are a commonly used visualization technique in which data are
mapped to optical properties, e.g., color or opacity. Color maps, however, do
not explicitly convey structures (e.g., positions and scale of features) within
data. Topology-based visualizations reveal and explicitly communicate
structures underlying data. Although we have a good understanding of what types
of features are captured by topological visualizations, our understanding of
people's perception of those features is not. This paper evaluates the
sensitivity of topology-based isocontour, Reeb graph, and persistence diagram
visualizations compared to a reference color map visualization for
synthetically generated scalar fields on 2-manifold triangular meshes embedded
in 3D. In particular, we built and ran a human-subject study that evaluated the
perception of data features characterized by Gaussian signals and measured how
effectively each visualization technique portrays variations of data features
arising from the position and amplitude variation of a mixture of Gaussians.
For positional feature variations, the results showed that only the Reeb graph
visualization had high sensitivity. For amplitude feature variations,
persistence diagrams and color maps demonstrated the highest sensitivity,
whereas isocontours showed only weak sensitivity. These results take an
important step toward understanding which topology-based tools are best for
various data and task scenarios and their effectiveness in conveying
topological variations as compared to conventional color mapping.
