  Games involving quantum strategies often yield higher payoff. Here, we study
a practical realization of the three-player dilemma game using the
superconductivity-based quantum processors provided by IBM Q Experience. We
analyze the persistence of the quantum advantage under corruption of the input
states and how this depends on parameters of the payoff table. Specifically,
experimental fidelity and error are observed not to be properly anti
correlated, i.e., there are instances where a class of experiments with higher
fidelity yields a greater error in the payoff. Further, we find that the
classical strategy will always outperform the quantum strategy if corruption is
higher than half.
