  Data plays an important role in applications, analytic processes, and many
aspects of human activity. As data grows in size and complexity, we are met
with an imperative need for tools that promote understanding and explanations
over data-related operations. Data management research on explanations has
focused on the assumption that data resides in a single dataset, under one
common schema. But the reality of today's data is that it is frequently
un-integrated, coming from different sources with different schemas. When
different datasets provide different answers to semantically similar questions,
understanding the reasons for the discrepancies is challenging and cannot be
handled by the existing single-dataset solutions.
  In this paper, we propose Explain3D, a framework for explaining the
disagreements across disjoint datasets (3D). Explain3D focuses on identifying
the reasons for the differences in the results of two semantically similar
queries operating on two datasets with potentially different schemas. Our
framework leverages the queries to perform a semantic mapping across the
relevant parts of their provenance; discrepancies in this mapping point to
causes of the queries' differences. Exploiting the queries gives Explain3D an
edge over traditional schema matching and record linkage techniques, which are
query-agnostic. Our work makes the following contributions: (1) We formalize
the problem of deriving optimal explanations for the differences of the results
of semantically similar queries over disjoint datasets. (2) We design a 3-stage
framework for solving the optimal explanation problem. (3) We develop a
smart-partitioning optimizer that improves the efficiency of the framework by
orders of magnitude. (4)~We experiment with real-world and synthetic data to
demonstrate that Explain3D can derive precise explanations efficiently.
