  Context: Several researchers have reported their experiences in applying
secondary studies (Systematic Literature Reviews - SLRs and Systematic Mappings
- SMs) in Software Engineering (SE). However, there is still a lack of studies
discussing the value of performing secondary studies in an academic context.
Goal: The main goal of this study is to provide an overview on the use of
secondary studies in an academic context. Method: Two empirical research
methods were used. Initially, we conducted an SM to identify the available and
relevant studies on the use of secondary studies as a research methodology for
conducting SE research projects. Secondly, a survey was performed with 64 SE
researchers to identify their perception related to the value of performing
secondary studies to support their research projects. Results: Our results show
benefits of using secondary studies in the academic context, such as, providing
an overview of the literature as well as identifying relevant research
literature on a research area enabling to find reasons to explain why a
research project should be approved for a grant and/or supporting decisions
made in a research project. Difficulties faced by SE graduate students with
secondary studies are that they tend to be conducted by a team and it demands
more effort than a traditional review. Conclusions: Secondary studies are
valuable to graduate students. They should consider conducting a secondary
study for their research project due to the benefits and contributions provided
to develop the overall project. However, the advice of an experienced
supervisor is essential to avoid bias. In addition, the acquisition of skills
can increase student's motivation to pursue their research projects and prepare
them for both academic or industrial careers.
