  Trip hazards are a significant contributor to accidents on construction and
manufacturing sites, where over a third of Australian workplace injuries occur
[1]. Current safety inspections are labour intensive and limited by human
fallibility,making automation of trip hazard detection appealing from both a
safety and economic perspective. Trip hazards present an interesting challenge
to modern learning techniques because they are defined as much by affordance as
by object type; for example wires on a table are not a trip hazard, but can be
if lying on the ground. To address these challenges, we conduct a comprehensive
investigation into the performance characteristics of 11 different colour and
depth fusion approaches, including 4 fusion and one non fusion approach; using
colour and two types of depth images. Trained and tested on over 600 labelled
trip hazards over 4 floors and 2000m$\mathrm{^{2}}$ in an active construction
site,this approach was able to differentiate between identical objects in
different physical configurations (see Figure 1). Outperforming a colour-only
detector, our multi-modal trip detector fuses colour and depth information to
achieve a 4% absolute improvement in F1-score. These investigative results and
the extensive publicly available dataset moves us one step closer to assistive
or fully automated safety inspection systems on construction sites.
