  The future of direct terrestrial WIMP detection lies on two fronts: new, much
larger low background detectors sensitive to energy deposition, and detectors
with directional sensitivity. The former can large range of WIMP parameter
space using well tested technology while the latter may be necessary if one is
to disentangle particle physics parameters from astrophysical halo parameters.
Because directional detectors will be quite difficult to construct it is
worthwhile exploring in advance generally which experimental features will
yield the greatest benefits at the lowest costs. We examine the sensitivity of
directional detectors with varying angular tracking resolution with and without
the ability to distinguish forward versus backward recoils, and compare these
to the sensitivity of a detector where the track is projected onto a
two-dimensional plane. The latter detector regardless of where it is placed on
the Earth, can be oriented to produce a significantly better discrimination
signal than a 3D detector without this capability, and with sensitivity within
a factor of 2 of a full 3D tracking detector. Required event rates to
distinguish signals from backgrounds for a simple isothermal halo range from
the low teens in the best case to many thousands in the worst.
