  Certain spans of utterances in a discourse, referred to here as segments, are
widely assumed to form coherent units. Further, the segmental structure of
discourse has been claimed to constrain and be constrained by many phenomena.
However, there is weak consensus on the nature of segments and the criteria for
recognizing or generating them. We present quantitative results of a two part
study using a corpus of spontaneous, narrative monologues. The first part
evaluates the statistical reliability of human segmentation of our corpus,
where speaker intention is the segmentation criterion. We then use the
subjects' segmentations to evaluate the correlation of discourse segmentation
with three linguistic cues (referential noun phrases, cue words, and pauses),
using information retrieval metrics.
