  A typical problem in MOOCs is the missing opportunity for course conductors
to individually support students in overcoming their problems and
misconceptions. This paper presents the results of automatically intervening on
struggling students during programming exercises and offering peer feedback and
tailored bonus exercises. To improve learning success, we do not want to
abolish instructionally desired trial and error but reduce extensive struggle
and demotivation. Therefore, we developed adaptive automatic just-in-time
interventions to encourage students to ask for help if they require
considerably more than average working time to solve an exercise. Additionally,
we offered students bonus exercises tailored for their individual weaknesses.
The approach was evaluated within a live course with over 5,000 active students
via a survey and metrics gathered alongside. Results show that we can increase
the call outs for help by up to 66% and lower the dwelling time until issuing
action. Learnings from the experiments can further be used to pinpoint course
material to be improved and tailor content to be audience specific.
