  Controversies around race and machine learning have sparked debate among
computer scientists over how to design machine learning systems that guarantee
fairness. These debates rarely engage with how racial identity is embedded in
our social experience, making for sociological and psychological complexity.
This complexity challenges the paradigm of considering fairness to be a formal
property of supervised learning with respect to protected personal attributes.
Racial identity is not simply a personal subjective quality. For people labeled
"Black" it is an ascribed political category that has consequences for social
differentiation embedded in systemic patterns of social inequality achieved
through both social and spatial segregation. In the United States, racial
classification can best be understood as a system of inherently unequal status
categories that places whites as the most privileged category while signifying
the Negro/black category as stigmatized. Social stigma is reinforced through
the unequal distribution of societal rewards and goods along racial lines that
is reinforced by state, corporate, and civic institutions and practices. This
creates a dilemma for society and designers: be blind to racial group
disparities and thereby reify racialized social inequality by no longer
measuring systemic inequality, or be conscious of racial categories in a way
that itself reifies race. We propose a third option. By preceding group
fairness interventions with unsupervised learning to dynamically detect
patterns of segregation, machine learning systems can mitigate the root cause
of social disparities, social segregation and stratification, without further
anchoring status categories of disadvantage.
