  K-essence models, relying on scalar fields with non-canonical kinetic terms,
have been proposed as an alternative to quintessence in explaining the observed
acceleration of the Universe. We consider the use of field redefinitions to
cast k-essence in a more familiar form. While k-essence models cannot in
general be rewritten in the form of quintessence models, we show that in
certain dynamical regimes an equivalence can be made, which in particular can
shed light on the tracking behaviour of k-essence. In several cases, k-essence
cannot be observationally distinguished from quintessence using the homogeneous
evolution, though there may be small effects on the perturbation spectrum. We
make a detailed analysis of two k-essence models from the literature and
comment on the nature of the fine tuning arising in the models.
