  We present two novel algorithms for learning formulas in Linear Temporal
Logic (LTL) from examples. The first learning algorithm reduces the learning
task to a series of satisfiability problems in propositional Boolean logic and
produces a smallest LTL formula (in terms of the number of subformulas) that is
consistent with the given data. Our second learning algorithm, on the other
hand, combines the SAT-based learning algorithm with classical algorithms for
learning decision trees. The result is a learning algorithm that scales to
real-world scenarios with hundreds of examples, but can no longer guarantee to
produce minimal consistent LTL formulas. We compare both learning algorithms
and demonstrate their performance on a wide range of synthetic benchmarks.
Additionally, we illustrate their usefulness on the task of understanding
executions of a leader election protocol.
