  We report on an effort to develop methodologies for formal verification of
parts of the Multi-Purpose Daemon (MPD) parallel process management system. MPD
is a distributed collection of communicating processes. While the individual
components of the collection execute simple algorithms, their interaction leads
to unexpected errors that are difficult to uncover by conventional means. Two
verification approaches are discussed here: the standard model checking
approach using the software model checker SPIN and the nonstandard use of a
general-purpose first-order resolution-style theorem prover OTTER to conduct
the traditional state space exploration. We compare modeling methodology and
analyze performance and scalability of the two methods with respect to
verification of MPD.
