  High-z galaxy gas-phase metallicities are usually determined through
observations of strong optical emission lines with calibrations tied to the
local universe. Recent debate has questioned if these calibrations are valid in
the high-z universe. We investigate this by analysing a sample of 16 galaxies
at z~2 available in the literature, and for which the metallicity can be
robustly determined using oxygen auroral lines. The sample spans a redshift
range of 1.4 < z < 3.6, has metallicities of 7.4-8.4 in 12+log(O/H) and stellar
masses 10^7.5-10^11 Msun. We test commonly used strong line diagnostics (R23,
O3, O2, O32, N2, O3N2 and Ne3O2 ) as prescribed by four different sets of
empirical calibrations, as well as one fully theoretical calibration. We find
that none of the strong line diagnostics (or calibration set) tested perform
consistently better than the others. Amongst the line ratios tested, R23 and O3
deliver the best results, with accuracies as good as 0.01-0.04 dex and
dispersions of ~0.2 dex in two of the calibrations tested. Generally, line
ratios involving nitrogen predict higher values of metallicity, while results
with O32 and Ne3O2 show large dispersions. The theoretical calibration yields
an accuracy of 0.06 dex, comparable to the best strong line methods. We
conclude that, within the metallicity range tested in this work, the locally
calibrated diagnostics can still be reliably applied at z~2.
