  A notably enhanced comprehension of the underlying meaning of quantum
observations is achieved via a novel premise. Assessments, from first
principles, are made of unexamined presumptions that lie at the heart of both
conventional conceptions of the nature of physical existence and most
interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. An alternative hypothesis, termed
Episodic Time Inhabitation, is proposed to resolve major Quantum quandaries,
including the EPR paradox. A logical argument gedanken experiment demonstrates
that the conventional presumptions appear to create causal loops, and that
Episodic Time Inhabitation avoids them. A physically realizable version of the
gedanken experiment is outlined, and currently testable predictions for its
outcome are made. Consequences of the experiment are summarized and
ramifications of the hypothesis are discussed.
