  We present the quantum measurement problem as a serious physics problem.
Serious because without a resolution, quantum theory is not complete, as it
does not tell how one should - in principle - perform measurements. It is
physical in the sense that the solution will bring new physics, i.e. new
testable predictions, hence it is not merely a matter of interpretation of a
frozen formalism. I argue that the two popular ways around the measurement
problem, many-worlds and Bohmian-like mechanics, do, de facto, introduce
effective collapses when "I" interact with the quantum system. Hence,
surprisingly, in many-worlds and Bohmian mechanics, the "I" plays a more active
role than in alternative models, like e.g. collapse models. Finally, I argue
that either there are several kinds of stuffs out there, i.e. physical dualism,
some stuff that respects the superposition principle and some that doesn't, or
there are special configurations of atoms and photons for which the
superposition principle breaks down. Or, and this I argue is the most
promising, the dynamics has to be modified, i.e. in the form of a stochastic
Schr\"odinger equation.
