  Scalarizing functions have been widely used to convert a multiobjective
optimization problem into a single objective optimization problem. However,
their use in solving (computationally) expensive multi- and many-objective
optimization problems in Bayesian multiobjective optimization is scarce.
Scalarizing functions can play a crucial role on the quality and number of
evaluations required when doing the optimization. In this article, we study and
review 15 different scalarizing functions in the framework of Bayesian
multiobjective optimization and build Gaussian process models (as surrogates,
metamodels or emulators) on them. We use expected improvement as infill
criterion (or acquisition function) to update the models. In particular, we
compare different scalarizing functions and analyze their performance on
several benchmark problems with different number of objectives to be optimized.
The review and experiments on different functions provide useful insights when
using and selecting a scalarizing function when using a Bayesian multiobjective
optimization method.
