  This paper continues an established line of research about the relations
between argumentation theory, particularly assumption-based argumentation, and
different kinds of logic programs. In particular, we extend known result of
Caminada, Schultz and Toni by showing that assumption-based argumentation can
represent not only normal logic programs, but also disjunctive logic programs
and their extensions. For this, we consider some inference rules for
disjunction that the core logic of the argumentation frameworks should respect,
and show the correspondence to the handling of disjunctions in the heads of the
logic programs' rules.
