  We study the tradeoff between consistency and robustness in the context of a
single-trajectory time-varying Markov Decision Process (MDP) with untrusted
machine-learned advice. Our work departs from the typical approach of treating
advice as coming from black-box sources by instead considering a setting where
additional information about how the advice is generated is available. We prove
a first-of-its-kind consistency and robustness tradeoff given Q-value advice
under a general MDP model that includes both continuous and discrete
state/action spaces. Our results highlight that utilizing Q-value advice
enables dynamic pursuit of the better of machine-learned advice and a robust
baseline, thus result in near-optimal performance guarantees, which provably
improves what can be obtained solely with black-box advice.
