  We consider a single buyer with a combinatorial preference that would like to
purchase related products and services from different vendors, where each
vendor supplies exactly one product. We study the general case where subsets of
products can be substitutes as well as complementary and analyze the game that
is induced on the vendors, where a vendor's strategy is the price that he asks
for his product. This model generalizes both Bertrand competition (where
vendors are perfect substitutes) and Nash bargaining (where they are perfect
complements), and captures a wide variety of scenarios that can appear in
complex crowd sourcing or in automatic pricing of related products.
  We study the equilibria of such games and show that a pure efficient
equilibrium always exists. In the case of submodular buyer preferences we fully
characterize the set of pure Nash equilibria, essentially showing uniqueness.
For the even more restricted "substitutes" buyer preferences we also prove
uniqueness over {\em mixed} equilibria. Finally we begin the exploration of
natural generalizations of our setting such as when services have costs, when
there are multiple buyers or uncertainty about the the buyer's valuation, and
when a single vendor supplies multiple products.
