  Scenario programs have established themselves as efficient tools towards
decision-making under uncertainty. To assess the quality of scenario-based
solutions a posteriori, validation tests based on Bernoulli trials have been
widely adopted in practice. However, to reach a theoretically reliable
judgement of risk, one typically needs to collect massive validation samples.
In this work, we propose new a posteriori bounds for convex scenario programs
with validation tests, which are dependent on both realizations of support
constraints and performance on out-of-sample validation data. The proposed
bounds enjoy wide generality in that many existing theoretical results can be
incorporated as particular cases. To facilitate practical use, a systematic
approach for parameterizing a posteriori probability bounds is also developed,
which is shown to possess a variety of desirable properties allowing for easy
implementations and clear interpretations. By synthesizing comprehensive
information about support constraints and validation tests, improved risk
evaluation can be achieved for randomized solutions in comparison with existing
a posteriori bounds. Case studies on controller design of aircraft lateral
motion are presented to validate the effectiveness of the proposed a posteriori
bounds.
