  This note is a reply to M. Navascu\'es' claim that "all entangled states
violate Leggett's crypto-nonlocality" [arXiv:1303.5124v2]. I argue that such a
conclusion can only be reached if one introduces additional assumptions that
further restrict Leggett's notion of "crypto-nonlocality". If a contrario one
sticks only to Leggett's original axioms, there exist entangled states whose
correlations are always compatible with Leggett's crypto-nonlocality---which is
thus a genuinely different concept from quantum separability. I clarify in this
note the relation between these two notions, together also with Bell's
assumption of local causality.
