  Peer review is one of useful and powerful performance measurement process. In
Korea, it needs to increase quality of R&D performance, but bibliometric
evaluation and lack of peers have opposite effect. We used system dynamics to
describe Korean R&D performance measurement system and ways to increase
performance quality. To meet a desired R&D performance quality, increasing
fairness and quality of evaluation is needed. Size of peer pool decreased
because of the specialization of R&D projects and the Sangpi process both, and
it is critical to acquire both fairness and quality. Also, shortening
evaluation period affect to R&D performance quality, by causing workloads
increase, limiting long-term and innovative R&D projects, and decreasing
evaluation quality. Previous evaluation policies do a role like
micro-controlling the R&D's activities, but increasing the size of peer pool
and changing evaluation period would make a change to quality and fairness of
evaluation.
