  Mutation testing is a standard technique to evaluate the quality of a test
suite. Due to its computationally intensive nature, many approaches have been
proposed to make this technique feasible in real case scenarios. Among these
approaches, uniform random mutant selection has been demonstrated to be simple
and promising. However, works on this area analyze mutant samples at project
level mainly on projects with adequate test suites. In this paper, we fill this
lack of empirical validation by analyzing random mutant selection at class
level on projects with non-adequate test suites. First, we show that uniform
random mutant selection underachieves the expected results. Then, we propose a
new approach named weighted random mutant selection which generates more
representative mutant samples. Finally, we show that representative mutant
samples are larger for projects with high test adequacy.
