  In this note I argue that a version of complementarity is possible which
evades the need for the "firewalls" recently proposed by Almheiri, Marolf,
Polchinski, and Sully to burn up observers falling into black hole horizons. In
particular I claim that it is consistent for an infalling observer to fall
through an "old" black hole horizon without burning up, without this observer
or any other seeing information loss or a violation of low energy effective
field theory in an unexpected place. The reason that AMPS find the opposite
conclusion is because they attempt to use low energy physics to translate
between the quantum mechanics of different observers rather than to describe
the experiments of only a single observer; I argue that this translation is
polluted by short-distance physics related to stretched horizons.
