  State-space exploration is an essential step in many modeling and analysis
problems. Its goal is to find the states reachable from the initial state of a
discrete-state model described. The state space can used to answer important
questions, e.g., "Is there a dead state?" and "Can N become negative?", or as a
starting point for sophisticated investigations expressed in temporal logic.
  Unfortunately, the state space is often so large that ordinary explicit data
structures and sequential algorithms cannot cope, prompting the exploration of
(1) parallel approaches using multiple processors, from simple workstation
networks to shared-memory supercomputers, to satisfy large memory and runtime
requirements and (2) symbolic approaches using decision diagrams to encode the
large structured sets and relations manipulated during state-space generation.
  Both approaches have merits and limitations. Parallel explicit state-space
generation is challenging, but almost linear speedup can be achieved; however,
the analysis is ultimately limited by the memory and processors available.
Symbolic methods are a heuristic that can efficiently encode many, but not all,
functions over a structured and exponentially large domain; here the pitfalls
are subtler: their performance varies widely depending on the class of decision
diagram chosen, the state variable order, and obscure algorithmic parameters.
  As symbolic approaches are often much more efficient than explicit ones for
many practical models, we argue for the need to parallelize symbolic
state-space generation algorithms, so that we can realize the advantage of both
approaches. This is a challenging endeavor, as the most efficient symbolic
algorithm, Saturation, is inherently sequential. We conclude by discussing
challenges, efforts, and promising directions toward this goal.
