  The quenched gluon and ghost propagator data published in [1] is reanalysed
following the suggestion of [2] to resolve the differences between the infrared
data of the simulations. Our results confirms that the procedure works well
either for the gluon or for the ghost propagator but not for both propagators
simultaneously as the observed deviations in the data follow opposite patterns.
Definitive conclusions require improving the determination of the (ratios) of
lattice spacings. A simple procedure for the relative calibration of the
lattice spacing in lattice simulations is suggested.
