  Feedback is the core concept in cybernetics and its effective use has made
great success in but not limited to the fields of engineering, biology, and
computer science. When feedback is used to quantum systems, two major types of
feedback control protocols including coherent feedback control (CFC) and
measurement-based feedback control (MFC) have been developed. In this paper, we
compare the two types of quantum feedback control protocols by focusing on the
real-time information used in the feedback loop and the capability in dealing
with parameter uncertainty. An equivalent relationship is established between
quantum CFC and non-selective quantum MFC in the form of operator-sum
representation. Using several examples of quantum feedback control, we show
that quantum MFC can theoretically achieve better performance than quantum CFC
in stabilizing a quantum state and dealing with Hamiltonian parameter
uncertainty. The results enrich understanding of the relative advantages
between quantum MFC and quantum CFC, and can provide useful information in
choosing suitable feedback protocols for quantum systems.
