  Surface photometry of 311 ellipticals from the 2MASS imaging database is
analyzed with respect to the two most common fitting functions; the r^1/4 law
and the Sersic r^1/n model. The advantages and disadvantages of each fitting
function are examined. In particular, the r^1/4 law performs well in the middle
regions, but is inadequate for the core (inner 5 kpcs) and the outer regions
(beyond the half-light radius) which do not have r^1/4 shapes. It is found that
the Sersic r^1/n model produce good fits to the core regions of ellipticals (r
< r_half), but is an inadequate function for the entire profile of an
elliptical from core to halo due to competing effects on the Sersic n index and
the fact that the interior shape of an elliptical is only weakly correlated
with its halo shape. In addition, there are a wide range of Sersic parameters
that will equally describe the shape of the outer profile, degrading the Sersic
models usefulness as a describer of the entire profile. Empirically determined
parameters, such as half-light radius and total luminosity, have less scatter
than fitting function variables. The scaling relations for ellipticals are
often non-linear, but for ellipticals brighter than M_J < -23 the following
structural relations are found: L propto r^0.8 \pm 0.1, L propto Sigma^-0.5 \pm
0.1 and Sigma propto r^-1.5 \pm 0.1.
