  In a previous work [Dillon and Nakanishi, Eur. Phys.J B {\bf 87}, 286
(2014)], we calculated the transmission coefficient of the two-dimensional
quantum percolation model and found there to be three regimes, namely,
exponentially localized, power-law localized, and delocalized. However, the
existence of these phase transitions remains controversial, with many other
works divided between those which claim that quantum percolation in 2D is
always localized, and those which assert there is a transition to a less
localized or delocalized state. It stood out that many works based on highly
anisotropic two-dimensional strips fall in the first group, whereas our
previous work and most others in the second group were based on an isotropic
square geometry. To better understand the difference in our results and those
based on strip geometry, we apply our direct calculation of the transmission
coefficient to highly anisotropic strips of varying widths at three energies
and a wide range of dilutions. We find that the localization length of the
strips does not converge at low dilution as the strip width increases toward
the isotropic limit, indicating the presence of a delocalized state for small
disorder. We additionally calculate the inverse participation ratio of the
lattices and find that it too signals a phase transition from delocalized to
localized near the same dilutions.
