  The widely-studied radio network model [Chlamtac and Kutten, 1985] is a
graph-based description that captures the inherent impact of collisions in
wireless communication. In this model, the strong assumption is made that node
$v$ receives a message from a neighbor if and only if exactly one of its
neighbors broadcasts.
  We relax this assumption by introducing a new noisy radio network model in
which random faults occur at senders or receivers. Specifically, for a constant
noise parameter $p \in [0,1)$, either every sender has probability $p$ of
transmitting noise or every receiver of a single transmission in its
neighborhood has probability $p$ of receiving noise.
  We first study single-message broadcast algorithms in noisy radio networks
and show that the Decay algorithm [Bar-Yehuda et al., 1992] remains robust in
the noisy model while the diameter-linear algorithm of Gasieniec et al., 2007
does not. We give a modified version of the algorithm of Gasieniec et al., 2007
that is robust to sender and receiver faults, and extend both this modified
algorithm and the Decay algorithm to robust multi-message broadcast algorithms.
  We next investigate the extent to which (network) coding improves throughput
in noisy radio networks. We address the previously perplexing result of Alon et
al. 2014 that worst case coding throughput is no better than worst case routing
throughput up to constants: we show that the worst case throughput performance
of coding is, in fact, superior to that of routing -- by a $\Theta(\log(n))$
gap -- provided receiver faults are introduced. However, we show that any
coding or routing scheme for the noiseless setting can be transformed to be
robust to sender faults with only a constant throughput overhead. These
transformations imply that the results of Alon et al., 2014 carry over to noisy
radio networks with sender faults.
