  In Crull (2015) it is argued that, in order to confront outstanding problems
in cosmology and quantum gravity, interpretational aspects of quantum theory
can by bypassed because decoherence is able to resolve them. As a result, Crull
(2015) concludes that our focus on conceptual and interpretational issues,
while dealing with such matters in Okon and Sudarsky (2014), is avoidable and
even pernicious. Here we will defend our position by showing in detail why
decoherence does not help in the resolution of foundational questions in
quantum mechanics, such as the measurement problem or the emergence of
classicality.
