  Recent claims of the Seattle group of evidence of "slope difference between
CD [Coulomb Dissociation] and direct [capture] results" are based on wrong and
selective data. When the RIKEN2 data are included correctly, and previously
published Direct Capture (DC) data are also included, we observe only a 1.9
sigma difference in the extracted so called "scale independent slope (b)",
considerably smaller than claimed by the Seattle group. The very
parameterization used by the Seattle group to extract the so called b-slope
parameter has no physical foundation. Considering the physical slope (S' =
dS/dE), we observe a 1.0 sigma agreement between slopes (S') measured in CD and
DC, refuting the need for new theoretical investigation. The claim that S17(0)
values extracted from CD data are approximately 10% lower than DC results, is
based on misunderstanding of the CD method. Considering all of the published CD
S17(0) results, with adding back an unconfirmed E2 correction of the MSU data,
yields very consistent S17(0) results that agree with recent DC measurements of
the Seattle and Weizmann groups. The recent correction of the b-slope parameter
(0.25 1/MeV) suggested by Esbensen, Bertsch and Snover was applied to the wrong
b-slope parameter calculated by the Seattle group. When considering the correct
slope of the RIKEN2 data, this correction in fact leads to a very small b-slope
parameter (0.14 1/MeV), less than half the central value observed for DC data,
refuting the need to correct the RIKEN2 data. In particular it confirms that
the E2 contribution in the RIKEN2 data is negligible. The dispersion of
measured S17(0) is mostly due to disagreement among individual DC experiments
and not due to either experimental or theoretical aspects of CD.
