  We describe an implementation of a semi-automated review system for the
astrophysics literature. Registered users identify names under which they
publish, and provide scores for individual papers of their choosing. Scores are
held confidentially, and combined in a weighted average grade for each paper.
The grade is divided among the co-authors as assigned credit. The credit
accumulated by each user (their ``mass'') provides the weight by which their
score is averaged into papers' grades. Thus, papers' grades and users' masses
are mutually dependent and evolve in time as scores are added. Likewise, a
user's influence on the grade of a paper is determined from the perceived
original scientific contribution of all the user's previous papers. The
implementation, called RefSponse -- currently hosted at
http://bororo.physics.mcgill.ca -- includes papers in astro-ph, the ApJ, AJ,
A&A, MNRAS, PASP, PASJ, New Astronomy, Nature, ARA&A, Phys. Rev. Letters, Phys.
Rev. D. and Acta Astronomica from 1965 to the present, making extensive use of
the NASA/ADS abstract server. We describe some of the possible utilities of
this system in enabling progress in the field.
