  Recently, Maldacena and Susskind arXiv:1306.0533 and Jensen and Karch
arXiv:1307.1132 argued that a wormhole can be interpreted as an EPR pair. We
point out that a convincing justification of such an interpretation would
require a quantitative evidence that correlations between two ends of the
wormhole are equal to those between the members of the EPR pair. As long as the
existing results do not contain such evidence, the interpretation of wormhole
as an EPR pair does not seem justified.
