  Even though quantum entanglement is today's most essential concept within the
new technological era of quantum information processing, we do not only lack a
consistent definition of this kernel notion, we are also far from understanding
its physical meaning [35]. These failures have lead to many problems when
attempting to provide a consistent measure or quantification of entanglement.
In fact, the two main lines of contemporary research within the orthodox
literature have created mazes where inconsistencies and problems are found
everywhere. While the operational-instrumentalist approach has failed to
explain how inequalities are able to distinguish the classical from the
quantum, the geometrical approach has failed to provide a consistent meaningful
account of their entropic measure. Taking distance from orthodoxy, in this work
we address the quantification and measure of quantum entanglement by
considering a recently presented objective-invariant definition in terms of the
coding of intensive relations [21] which allows to escape the widespread
relativist account of bases and factorizations [24, 25]. Going beyond the
orthodox dualistic reference to "quantum particles" and "clicks" in detectors,
we will argue that this new line of research is capable not only to evade the
many open problems which appear within the mainstream literature, but is also
able to present a consistent and coherent physical understanding of
entanglement. The main conclusion of this work is that in quantum mechanics --
contrary to what is generally presupposed -- all operational expressions found
within the laboratory are intrinsically entangled.
