  We reply to a recent Comment on our previous article [Phys. Rev. Lett. 86,
5140 (2001)] by Olsson and Teitel [cond-mat/0404473]. We point out that their
scaling argument to question the possible vortex slush phase in the frustrated
XY model with point defects cannot be sufficiently justified by the provided
numerical data, and that their data are indeed consistent with our previous
article.
