  Lawrence et al. have presented an argument purporting to show that "relative
facts do not exist" and, consequently, "Relational Quantum Mechanics is
incompatible with quantum mechanics". The argument is based on a GHZ-like
contradiction between constraints satisfied by measurement outcomes in an
extended Wigner's friend scenario. Here we present a strengthened version of
the argument, and show why, contrary to the claim by Lawrence et al., these
arguments do not contradict the consistency of a theory of relative facts.
Rather, considering this argument helps clarify how one should not think about
a theory of relative facts, like RQM.
