  We demonstrate that there are systematic scale errors in the [Fe/H] values
determined by the Hamburg/ESO Survey (and by inference by the HK Survey in the
past) for certain extremely metal poor highly C-enhanced giants. The
consequences of these scale errors are that a) the fraction of carbon stars at
extremely low metallicities has been overestimated in several papers in the
recent literature b) the number of extremely metal poor stars known is somewhat
lower than has been quoted in the recent literature c) the yield for extremely
metal poor stars by the HES Survey is somewhat lower than is stated in the
recent literature. A preliminary estimate for the frequency of Carbon stars
among the giants in the HES sample with -4 < [Fe/H] < -2.0 dex is 7.4 +-2.9%;
adding an estimate for the C-enhanced giants with [C/Fe] > 1.0 dex without
detectable C2 bands raises the fraction to 14 +-4$%.
  We rely on the results of an extensive set of homogeneous detailed abundance
analyses of stars expected to have [Fe/H] < -3.0 dex selected from the HES to
establish these claims. We have found that the Fe-metallicity of the cooler
(Teff < 5200K) C-stars as derived from spectra taken with HIRES at Keck are a
factor of ~10 higher than those obtained via the algorithm used by the HES
project to analyze the moderate resolution follow-up spectra, which is
identical to that used until very recently by the HK Survey. This error in
Fe-abundance estimate for C-stars arises from a lowering of the emitted flux in
the continuum bandpasses of the KP (3933 A line of CaII) and particularly the
HP2 (Hdelta) indices used to estimate [Fe/H] due to absorption from strong
molecular bands.
