  While it is widely agreed that Bell's theorem is an important result in the
foundations of quantum physics, there is much disagreement about what exactly
Bell's theorem shows. It is agreed that Bell derived a contradiction with
experimental facts from some list of assumptions, thus showing that at least
one of the assumptions must be wrong; but there is disagreement about what the
assumptions were that went into the argument. In this paper, I make a few
points in order to help clarify the situation.
