  Recently, the new Kinect One has been issued by Microsoft, providing the next
generation of real-time range sensing devices based on the Time-of-Flight (ToF)
principle. As the first Kinect version was using a structured light approach,
one would expect various differences in the characteristics of the range data
delivered by both devices. This paper presents a detailed and in-depth
comparison between both devices. In order to conduct the comparison, we propose
a framework of seven different experimental setups, which is a generic basis
for evaluating range cameras such as Kinect. The experiments have been designed
with the goal to capture individual effects of the Kinect devices as isolatedly
as possible and in a way, that they can also be adopted, in order to apply them
to any other range sensing device. The overall goal of this paper is to provide
a solid insight into the pros and cons of either device. Thus, scientists that
are interested in using Kinect range sensing cameras in their specific
application scenario can directly assess the expected, specific benefits and
potential problem of either device.
