  We have made a new compilation of observations of maximum stellar mass versus
cluster membership number from the literature, which we analyse for consistency
with the predictions of a simple random drawing hypothesis for stellar mass
selection in clusters. Previously, Weidner and Kroupa have suggested that the
maximum stellar mass is lower, in low mass clusters, than would be expected on
the basis of random drawing, and have pointed out that this could have
important implications for steepening the integrated initial mass function of
the Galaxy (the IGIMF) at high masses. Our compilation demonstrates how the
observed distribution in the plane of maximum stellar mass versus membership
number is affected by the method of target selection; in particular, rather low
n clusters with large maximum stellar masses are abundant in observational
datasets that specifically seek clusters in the environs of high mass stars.
Although we do not consider our compilation to be either complete or unbiased,
we discuss the method by which such data should be statistically analysed. Our
very provisional conclusion is that the data is not indicating any striking
deviation from the expectations of random drawing.
