  Our recent determination of a Salpeter slope for the IMF in the field of 30
Doradus (Selman and Melnick 2005) appears to be in conflict with simple
probabilistic counting arguments advanced in the past to support observational
claims of a steeper IMF in the LMC field. In this paper we re-examine these
arguments and show by explicit construction that, contrary to these claims, the
field IMF is expected to be exactly the same as the stellar IMF of the clusters
out of which the field was presumably formed. We show that the current data on
the mass distribution of clusters themselves is in excellent agreement with our
model, and is consistent with a single spectrum {\it by number of stars} of the
type $n^\beta$ with beta between -1.8 and -2.2 down to the smallest clusters
without any preferred mass scale for cluster formation. We also use the random
sampling model to estimate the statistics of the maximal mass star in clusters,
and confirm the discrepancy with observations found by Weidner and Kroupa
(2006). We argue that rather than signaling the violation of the random
sampling model these observations reflect the gravitationally unstable nature
of systems with one very large mass star. We stress the importance of the
random sampling model as a \emph{null hypothesis} whose violation would signal
the presence of interesting physics.
