  The scope of the Baldwin effect was recently called into question by two
papers that closely examined the seminal work of Hinton and Nowlan. To this
date there has been no demonstration of its necessity in empirically
challenging tasks. Here we show that the Baldwin effect is capable of evolving
few-shot supervised and reinforcement learning mechanisms, by shaping the
hyperparameters and the initial parameters of deep learning algorithms.
Furthermore it can genetically accommodate strong learning biases on the same
set of problems as a recent machine learning algorithm called MAML "Model
Agnostic Meta-Learning" which uses second-order gradients instead of evolution
to learn a set of reference parameters (initial weights) that can allow rapid
adaptation to tasks sampled from a distribution. Whilst in simple cases MAML is
more data efficient than the Baldwin effect, the Baldwin effect is more general
in that it does not require gradients to be backpropagated to the reference
parameters or hyperparameters, and permits effectively any number of gradient
updates in the inner loop. The Baldwin effect learns strong learning dependent
biases, rather than purely genetically accommodating fixed behaviours in a
learning independent manner.
