  The astronomy community usually turns to the Astrophysics Data System for
bibliometrics. When the context is cross-disciplinary, commercial products like
Web of Science and Scopus are used along with related analytics tools instead.
The results are often tainted by inherent problems in the chosen classification
system. A review of the most common challenges and pitfalls is given.
  Commercial altmetrics products could be added to the evaluation toolbox in
the near future despite the fact that they are best suited for promotion
instead of evaluation.
  Norway, Denmark, and Finland have created journal and publisher ranking
systems that are used in national funding models. Differences in how astronomy
journals are weighed in these systems night be related to the volume of papers
published on a national level.
