  As visualization researchers evaluate the impact of visualization design on
decision-making, they often hold a one-dimensional perspective on the cognitive
processes behind making a decision. Several psychological and economical
researchers have shown that to make decisions, people rely on quantitative
reasoning as well as gist-based intuition -- two systems that operate in
parallel. In this position paper, we discuss decision theories and provide
suggestions to bridge the gap between the evaluation of decision-making in
visualization and psychology research. The goal is to question the limits of
our knowledge and to advocate for a more nuanced understanding of
decision-making with visualization.
