  The ability to develop, use, and refine models of experimental systems is a
nationally recognized learning outcome for undergraduate physics lab courses.
However, no assessments of students' model-based reasoning exist for
upper-division labs. This study is the first step toward development of
modeling assessments for optics and electronics labs. In order to identify test
objectives that are likely relevant across many institutional contexts, we
interviewed 35 lab instructors about the ways they incorporate modeling in
their course learning goals and activities. The study design was informed by
the Modeling Framework for Experimental Physics. This framework conceptualizes
modeling as consisting of multiple subtasks: making measurements, constructing
system models, comparing data to predictions, proposing causes for
discrepancies, and enacting revisions to models or apparatus. We found that
each modeling subtask was identified by multiple instructors as an important
learning outcome for their course. Based on these results, we argue that test
objectives should include probing students' competence with most modeling
subtasks, and test items should be designed to elicit students' justifications
for choosing particular modeling pathways. In addition to discussing these and
other implications for assessment, we also identify future areas of research
related to the role of modeling in optics and electronics labs.
