  Data processing systems impose multiple views on data as it is processed by
the system. These views include spreadsheets, databases, matrices, and graphs.
There are a wide variety of technologies that can be used to store and process
data through these different steps. The Lustre parallel file system, the Hadoop
distributed file system, and the Accumulo database are all designed to address
the largest and the most challenging data storage problems. There have been
many ad-hoc comparisons of these technologies. This paper describes the
foundational principles of each technology, provides simple models for
assessing their capabilities, and compares the various technologies on a
hypothetical common cluster. These comparisons indicate that Lustre provides 2x
more storage capacity, is less likely to loose data during 3 simultaneous drive
failures, and provides higher bandwidth on general purpose workloads. Hadoop
can provide 4x greater read bandwidth on special purpose workloads. Accumulo
provides 10,000x lower latency on random lookups than either Lustre or Hadoop
but Accumulo's bulk bandwidth is 10x less. Significant recent work has been
done to enable mix-and-match solutions that allow Lustre, Hadoop, and Accumulo
to be combined in different ways.
