  Recent research has shown that a single arbitrarily efficient solver can be
significantly outperformed by a portfolio of possibly slower on-average
solvers. The solver selection is usually done by means of (un)supervised
learning techniques which exploit features extracted from the problem
specification. In this paper we present an useful and flexible framework that
is able to extract an extensive set of features from a Constraint
(Satisfaction/Optimization) Problem defined in possibly different modeling
languages: MiniZinc, FlatZinc or XCSP. We also report some empirical results
showing that the performances that can be obtained using these features are
effective and competitive with state of the art CSP portfolio techniques.
