  We demonstrate serious misrepresentation of existing experimental data and
important omissions in the List of references in the paper [1]. We demonstrate
that what is called in [1] total photoionization cross-section is in fact a
partial photoionization cross-section. We demonstrate that long before [1] and
presented there experimental data for photoionization of Xe@C60+ were obtained,
a theoretical prediction for Xe@C60 have been published that was in a
reasonable agreement with experiment. These data are even not mentioned in [1].
