  The EPR paradox dates back to 1935 when Einstein et al., through the use of
non commuting operators, proposed that quantum mechanics was not complete in
that it suggested a `spooky action at a distance.' Later in 1964 John Bell was
able to express the dilemma in a simple inequality involving spin-singlet
states. If the inequality were satisfied then Einstein was correct and if it
were violated then it favored the quantum mechanics point of view. In what
follows, we present two approaches to Bell's inequality, and then offer an
interpretation from the viewpoint of quantum mechanics based on the principle
that the whole is more than the sum of its parts. This is then combined with
the properties of the $SU(2)$ group to give a more intuitive understanding of
non-locality and spin entanglement from the perspective of the relativistic
characteristics of rotations.
