  We comment here on the results in Ref [4] that showed naked singularities in
dynamical gravitational collapse of inhomogeneous dust to be stable but
non-generic. The definition of genericity used there is reconsidered. We point
out that genericity in terms of an open set, with a positive measure defined
suitably on the space of initial data, is physically more appropriate compared
to the dynamical systems theory definition used in [4] which makes both black
holes and naked singularities non-generic as collapse outcomes.
