  We study here a natural situation when constraint programming can be entirely
reduced to rule-based programming. To this end we explain first how one can
compute on constraint satisfaction problems using rules represented by simple
first-order formulas. Then we consider constraint satisfaction problems that
are based on predefined, explicitly given constraints. To solve them we first
derive rules from these explicitly given constraints and limit the computation
process to a repeated application of these rules, combined with labeling.We
consider here two types of rules. The first type, that we call equality rules,
leads to a new notion of local consistency, called {\em rule consistency} that
turns out to be weaker than arc consistency for constraints of arbitrary arity
(called hyper-arc consistency in \cite{MS98b}). For Boolean constraints rule
consistency coincides with the closure under the well-known propagation rules
for Boolean constraints. The second type of rules, that we call membership
rules, yields a rule-based characterization of arc consistency. To show
feasibility of this rule-based approach to constraint programming we show how
both types of rules can be automatically generated, as {\tt CHR} rules of
\cite{fruhwirth-constraint-95}. This yields an implementation of this approach
to programming by means of constraint logic programming. We illustrate the
usefulness of this approach to constraint programming by discussing various
examples, including Boolean constraints, two typical examples of many valued
logics, constraints dealing with Waltz's language for describing polyhedral
scenes, and Allen's qualitative approach to temporal logic.
