  Mean-payoff games (MPGs) are infinite duration two-player zero-sum games
played on weighted graphs. Under the hypothesis of perfect information, they
admit memoryless optimal strategies for both players and can be solved in
NP-intersect-coNP. MPGs are suitable quantitative models for open reactive
systems. However, in this context the assumption of perfect information is not
always realistic. For the partial-observation case, the problem that asks if
the first player has an observation-based winning strategy that enforces a
given threshold on the mean-payoff, is undecidable. In this paper, we study the
window mean-payoff objectives that were introduced recently as an alternative
to the classical mean-payoff objectives. We show that, in sharp contrast to the
classical mean-payoff objectives, some of the window mean-payoff objectives are
decidable in games with partial-observation.
