  There is an implicit assumption in software testing that more diverse and
varied test data is needed for effective testing and to achieve different types
and levels of coverage. Generic approaches based on information theory to
measure and thus, implicitly, to create diverse data have also been proposed.
However, if the tester is able to identify features of the test data that are
important for the particular domain or context in which the testing is being
performed, the use of generic diversity measures such as this may not be
sufficient nor efficient for creating test inputs that show diversity in terms
of these features. Here we investigate different approaches to find data that
are diverse according to a specific set of features, such as length, depth of
recursion etc. Even though these features will be less general than measures
based on information theory, their use may provide a tester with more direct
control over the type of diversity that is present in the test data. Our
experiments are carried out in the context of a general test data generation
framework that can generate both numerical and highly structured data. We
compare random sampling for feature-diversity to different approaches based on
search and find a hill climbing search to be efficient. The experiments
highlight many trade-offs that needs to be taken into account when searching
for diversity. We argue that recurrent test data generation motivates building
statistical models that can then help to more quickly achieve feature
diversity.
