  Approaches to decision-making under uncertainty in the belief function
framework are reviewed. Most methods are shown to blend criteria for decision
under ignorance with the maximum expected utility principle of Bayesian
decision theory. A distinction is made between methods that construct a
complete preference relation among acts, and those that allow incomparability
of some acts due to lack of information. Methods developed in the imprecise
probability framework are applicable in the Dempster-Shafer context and are
also reviewed. Shafer's constructive decision theory, which substitutes the
notion of goal for that of utility, is described and contrasted with other
approaches. The paper ends by pointing out the need to carry out deeper
investigation of fundamental issues related to decision-making with belief
functions and to assess the descriptive, normative and prescriptive values of
the different approaches.
