  Quantum experiments detect particles, but they reveal information about wave
properties. No matter how quanta are detected, they always express the local
net state of the corresponding wave-function. The mechanism behind this process
is still a mystery. However, quantum wave-functions evolve like classical
waves. If they determine all the observations, why do they entail "weird"
phenomena? In particular, why do they produce conceptual problems, such as the
EPR paradox? It turns out that all the major interpretations in quantum
mechanics are particle-based ontologies. Variables of fundamental interest,
such as momentum and position, are assumed to reflect the input states of
discrete entities, even when their evolution is predicted by wave equations.
Here I show that a whole class of microscopic phenomena, including
entanglement, can be interpreted without contradictions if the variables of
quantum mechanics are actually treated as wave properties. The main
recommendation is to assume that sharp spectral states are transient outcomes
of superposition, rather than permanent input components.
