  The question of first-cause has troubled philosophers and cosmologists alike.
Now that it is apparent that our universe began in a Big Bang explosion, the
question of what happened before the Big Bang arises. Inflation seems like a
very promising answer, but as Borde and Vilenkin have shown, the inflationary
state preceding the Big Bang must have had a beginning also. Ultimately, the
difficult question seems to be how to make something out of nothing. This paper
explores the idea that this is the wrong question --- that that is not how the
Universe got here. Instead, we explore the idea of whether there is anything in
the laws of physics that would prevent the Universe from creating itself.
Because spacetimes can be curved and multiply connected, general relativity
allows for the possibility of closed timelike curves (CTCs). Thus, tracing
backwards in time through the original inflationary state we may eventually
encounter a region of CTCs giving no first-cause. This region of CTCs, may well
be over by now (being bounded toward the future by a Cauchy horizon). We
illustrate that such models --- with CTCs --- are not necessarily inconsistent
by demonstrating self-consistent vacuums for Misner space and a multiply
connected de Sitter space in which the renormalized energy-momentum tensor does
not diverge as one approaches the Cauchy horizon and solves Einstein's
equations. We show such a Universe can be classically stable and
self-consistent if and only if the potentials are retarded, giving a natural
explanation of the arrow of time. Some specific scenarios (out of many possible
ones) for this type of model are described. For example: an inflationary
universe gives rise to baby universes, one of which turns out to be itself.
Interestingly, the laws of physics may allow the Universe to be its own mother.
