  The GTZAN dataset appears in at least 100 published works, and is the
most-used public dataset for evaluation in machine listening research for music
genre recognition (MGR). Our recent work, however, shows GTZAN has several
faults (repetitions, mislabelings, and distortions), which challenge the
interpretability of any result derived using it. In this article, we disprove
the claims that all MGR systems are affected in the same ways by these faults,
and that the performances of MGR systems in GTZAN are still meaningfully
comparable since they all face the same faults. We identify and analyze the
contents of GTZAN, and provide a catalog of its faults. We review how GTZAN has
been used in MGR research, and find few indications that its faults have been
known and considered. Finally, we rigorously study the effects of its faults on
evaluating five different MGR systems. The lesson is not to banish GTZAN, but
to use it with consideration of its contents.
