  Large Language Models (LLMs) have driven extraordinary improvements in NLP.
However, it is unclear how such models represent lexical concepts-i.e., the
meanings of the words they use. This paper evaluates the lexical
representations of GPT-3 and GPT-4 through the lens of HIPE theory, a theory of
concept representations which focuses on representations of words describing
artifacts (such as "mop", "pencil", and "whistle"). The theory posits a causal
graph that relates the meanings of such words to the form, use, and history of
the objects to which they refer. We test LLMs using the same stimuli originally
used by Chaigneau et al. (2004) to evaluate the theory in humans, and consider
a variety of prompt designs. Our experiments concern judgements about causal
outcomes, object function, and object naming. We find no evidence that GPT-3
encodes the causal structure hypothesized by HIPE, but do find evidence that
GPT-4 encodes such structure. The results contribute to a growing body of
research characterizing the representational capacity of large language models.
