  Inheritances, divorces or liquidations of companies require common assets to
be divided among the entitled parties. Legal methods usually consider the
market value of goods, while fair division theory takes into account the
parties' preferences expressed as utilities. I combine the two practices to
define a procedure that optimally allocates divisible goods with market values
to people with easily elicited preferences. Imposing exact equality in the
bundles' monetary values may produce unacceptable solutions. I drop the tight
requirement and suggest a procedure in which the differences in the monetary
values are explained in terms of satisfaction per monetary share as perceived
by the agents. A robustness study shows the consequences of misspecification in
the model parameters.
