  The problem of deciding the validity (QSAT) of quantified Boolean formulas
(QBF) is a vivid research area in both theory and practice. In the field of
parameterized algorithmics, the well-studied graph measure treewidth turned out
to be a successful parameter. A well-known result by Chen in parameterized
complexity is that QSAT when parameterized by the treewidth of the primal graph
of the input formula together with the quantifier depth of the formula is
fixed-parameter tractable. More precisely, the runtime of such an algorithm is
polynomial in the formula size and exponential in the treewidth, where the
exponential function in the treewidth is a tower, whose height is the
quantifier depth. A natural question is whether one can significantly improve
these results and decrease the tower while assuming the Exponential Time
Hypothesis (ETH). In the last years, there has been a growing interest in the
quest of establishing lower bounds under ETH, showing mostly problem-specific
lower bounds up to the third level of the polynomial hierarchy. Still, an
important question is to settle this as general as possible and to cover the
whole polynomial hierarchy. In this work, we show lower bounds based on the ETH
for arbitrary QBFs parameterized by treewidth (and quantifier depth). More
formally, we establish lower bounds for QSAT and treewidth, namely, that under
ETH there cannot be an algorithm that solves QSAT of quantifier depth i in
runtime significantly better than i-fold exponential in the treewidth and
polynomial in the input size. In doing so, we provide a versatile reduction
technique to compress treewidth that encodes the essence of dynamic programming
on arbitrary tree decompositions. Further, we describe a general methodology
for a more fine-grained analysis of problems parameterized by treewidth that
are at higher levels of the polynomial hierarchy.
