  The problem of maximizing a constrained monotone set function has many
practical applications and generalizes many combinatorial problems.
Unfortunately, it is generally not possible to maximize a monotone set function
up to an acceptable approximation ratio, even subject to simple constraints.
One highly studied approach to cope with this hardness is to restrict the set
function. An outstanding disadvantage of imposing such a restriction on the set
function is that no result is implied for set functions deviating from the
restriction, even slightly. A more flexible approach, studied by Feige and
Izsak, is to design an approximation algorithm whose approximation ratio
depends on the complexity of the instance, as measured by some complexity
measure. Specifically, they introduced a complexity measure called supermodular
degree, measuring deviation from submodularity, and designed an algorithm for
the welfare maximization problem with an approximation ratio that depends on
this measure.
  In this work, we give the first (to the best of our knowledge) algorithm for
maximizing an arbitrary monotone set function, subject to a k-extendible
system. This class of constraints captures, for example, the intersection of
k-matroids (note that a single matroid constraint is sufficient to capture the
welfare maximization problem). Our approximation ratio deteriorates gracefully
with the complexity of the set function and k. Our work can be seen as
generalizing both the classic result of Fisher, Nemhauser and Wolsey, for
maximizing a submodular set function subject to a k-extendible system, and the
result of Feige and Izsak for the welfare maximization problem. Moreover, when
our algorithm is applied to each one of these simpler cases, it obtains the
same approximation ratio as of the respective original work.
