  Non-locality, or quantum-non-locality, are buzzwords in the community of
quantum foundation and information scientists, which purportedly describe the
implications of Bell's theorem. When such phrases are treated seriously, that
is it is claimed that Bell's theorem reveals non-locality as an inherent trait
of the quantum description of the micro-world, this leads to logical
contradictions, which will be discussed here. In fact, Bell's theorem,
understood as violation of Bell inequalities by quantum predictions, is
consistent with Bohr's notion of complementarity. Thus, if it points to
anything, then it is rather the significance of the principle of Bohr, but even
this is not a clear implication. Non-locality is a necessary consequence of
Bell's theorem only if we reject complementarity by adopting some form of
realism, be it additional hidden variables, additional hidden causes, etc., or
counterfactual definiteness.
  The essay contains two largely independent parts. The first one is addressed
to any reader interested in the topic. The second, discussing the notion of
local causality, is addressed to people working in the field.
