  The Clauser-Horne (CH) inequality can validly test aspects of locality when
properly applied. This paper analyzes a recent CH-based EPRB experiment, the
Christensen et al. experiment. Full details of the data analysis applied to the
experiment are given. An alternative analysis is also presented that considers
the role of accidental coincidences and confirms and justifies the main
analysis. It is shown that the experiment confirms locality and disconfirms the
quantum joint prediction. To make sense of this surprising finding, the
conclusion presents a new rational interpretation of the EPR paradox. The paper
also contributes to promulgation of robust and correct data analysis by
describing the important degrees of freedom that affect the analysis, and that
must be addressed in the analysis of any EPRB experiment.
