  Conditional Simple Temporal Network (CSTN) is a constraint-based
graph-formalism for conditional temporal planning. It offers a more flexible
formalism than the equivalent CSTP model of Tsamardinos, Vidal and Pollack,
from which it was derived mainly as a sound formalization. Three notions of
consistency arise for CSTNs and CSTPs: weak, strong, and dynamic. Dynamic
consistency is the most interesting notion, but it is also the most challenging
and it was conjectured to be hard to assess. Tsamardinos, Vidal and Pollack
gave a doubly-exponential time algorithm for deciding whether a CSTN is
dynamically-consistent and to produce, in the positive case, a dynamic
execution strategy of exponential size. In the present work we offer a proof
that deciding whether a CSTN is dynamically-consistent is coNP-hard and provide
the first singly-exponential time algorithm for this problem, also producing a
dynamic execution strategy whenever the input CSTN is dynamically-consistent.
The algorithm is based on a novel connection with Mean Payoff Games, a family
of two-player combinatorial games on graphs well known for having applications
in model-checking and formal verification. The presentation of such connection
is mediated by the Hyper Temporal Network model, a tractable generalization of
Simple Temporal Networks whose consistency checking is equivalent to
determining Mean Payoff Games. In order to analyze the algorithm we introduce a
refined notion of dynamic-consistency, named \epsilon-dynamic-consistency, and
present a sharp lower bounding analysis on the critical value of the reaction
time \hat{\varepsilon} where the CSTN transits from being, to not being,
dynamically-consistent. The proof technique introduced in this analysis of
\hat{\varepsilon} is applicable more in general when dealing with linear
difference constraints which include strict inequalities.
