  We evaluate the performance of four different machine learning (ML)
algorithms: an Artificial Neural Network Multi-Layer Perceptron (ANN MLP ),
Adaboost, Gradient Boosting Classifier (GBC), XGBoost, for the separation of
pulsars from radio frequency interference (RFI) and other sources of noise,
using a dataset obtained from the post-processing of a pulsar search pi peline.
This dataset was previously used for cross-validation of the SPINN-based
machine learning engine, used for the reprocessing of HTRU-S survey data
arXiv:1406.3627. We have used Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique
(SMOTE) to deal with high class imbalance in the dataset. We report a variety
of quality scores from all four of these algorithms on both the non-SMOTE and
SMOTE datasets. For all the above ML methods, we report high accuracy and
G-mean in both the non-SMOTE and SMOTE cases. We study the feature importances
using Adaboost, GBC, and XGBoost and also from the minimum Redundancy Maximum
Relevance approach to report algorithm-agnostic feature ranking. From these
methods, we find that the signal to noise of the folded profile to be the best
feature. We find that all the ML algorithms report FPRs about an order of
magnitude lower than the corresponding FPRs obtained in arXiv:1406.3627, for
the same recall value.
