  This article has a dual objective. Firstly, it aims to investigate whether
gender diversity in publications reviewed on Pubpeer has an impact on the
(non)retraction of those publications. Secondly, it seeks to analyze the
reasons for retractions and examine if there are disparities in retractions
based on male-female collaborations. To achieve this, the study utilized a
sample of 93,563 publications discussed on Pubpeer spanning the period from
2012 to 2021. The findings reveal that among the reviewed publications, 5%
(4,513) were retracted. The concentration index and regression results indicate
that publications authored solely by men or led by male authors are 20% to 29%
more likely to be retracted compared to those authored solely by women.
Regarding the reasons for retractions, the results show that regardless of
gender, authors, when working alone, are more prone to engaging in activities
such as fake peer review or plagiarism. Women are more concentrated in image
manipulation and data errors, while men are more involved in article
duplication. Furthermore, the results demonstrate an inverse relationship
between the number of authors and retractions, suggesting that a higher number
of authors may facilitate better publication control and reduce the temptation
for misconduct.
