  We analyse notion of independence in the EPR-Bohm framework by using
comparative analysis of independence in conventional and frequency probability
theories. Such an analysis is important to demonstrate that Bell's inequality
was obtained by using totally unjustified assumptions (e.g. the
Bell-Clauser-Horne factorability condition). Our frequency analysis also
demonstrated that Gill-Weihs-Zeilinger-Zukowski's arguments based on "the
experimenter's freedom to choose settings" to support the standard Bell
approach are neither justified by the structure of the EPR-Bohm experiment.
Finally, our analysis supports the original Einstein's viewpoint that quantum
mechanics is simply not complete.
