  We examine the strategic interaction between an expert (principal) maximizing
engagement and an agent seeking swift information. Our analysis reveals: When
priors align, relative patience determines optimal disclosure -- impatient
agents induce gradual revelation, while impatient principals cause delayed,
abrupt revelation. When priors disagree, catering to the bias often emerges,
with the principal initially providing signals aligned with the agent's bias.
With private agent beliefs, we observe two phases: one engaging both agents,
followed by catering to one type. Comparing personalized and non-personalized
strategies, we find faster information revelation in the non-personalized case,
but higher quality information in the personalized case.
