  Media outlets play a key role in spreading scientific knowledge to the
general public and raising the profile of researchers among their peers. Yet,
how journalists choose to present researchers in their stories is poorly
understood. Using a comprehensive dataset of 223,587 news stories from 288 U.S.
outlets reporting on 100,486 research papers across all areas of science, we
investigate if the authors' ethnicities, as inferred from names, are associated
with whether journalists explicitly mention them by name. By focusing on
research papers news outlets chose to cover, our analysis reduces concerns that
differences in name mentions are driven by differences in research quality or
newsworthiness. We find substantial disparities in name mention rates across
ethnically-distinctive names. Researchers with non-Anglo names, especially
those with East Asian and African names, are significantly less likely to be
mentioned in news stories covering their research, even when comparing stories
from a particular news outlet reporting on publications in a particular
scientific venue on a particular research topic. The disparities are not fully
explained by authors' affiliation locations, suggesting that pragmatic factors
such as difficulties in scheduling interviews play only a partial role.
Furthermore, among U.S.-based authors, journalists more often use authors'
institutions instead of names when referring to non-Anglo-named authors,
suggesting that journalists' rhetorical choices are also key. Overall, this
study finds evidence of ethnic disparities in how researchers are described in
the media coverage of their research, likely affecting thousands of
non-Anglo-named scholars in our data alone.
