  AGM's belief revision is one of the main paradigms in the study of belief
change operations. In this context, belief bases (prioritised bases) have been
primarily used to specify the agent's belief state. While the connection of
iterated AGM-like operations and their encoding in dynamic epistemic logics
have been studied before, few works considered how well-known postulates from
iterated belief revision theory can be characterised by means of belief bases
and their counterpart in dynamic epistemic logic. Particularly, it has been
shown that some postulates can be characterised through transformations in
priority graphs, while others may not be represented that way. This work
investigates changes in the semantics of Dynamic Preference Logic that give
rise to an appropriate syntactic representation for its models that allow us to
represent and reason about iterated belief base change in this logic.
