  In this paper we will provide a quantitative analysis of a simple model of
the Federal Disaster Assistance policy from the viewpoint of three different
stakeholders. This quantitative methodology is new and has applications to
other areas such as business and healthcare processes. The stakeholders are
interested in process transparency but each has a different opinion on
precisely what constitutes transparency. We will also consider three
modifications to the Federal Disaster Assistance policy and analyse, from a
stakeholder viewpoint, how stakeholder satisfaction changes from process to
process. This analysis is used to rank the favourability of four policies with
respect to all collective stakeholder preferences.
