  Increasing design complexity driven by feature and performance requirements
and the Time to Market (TTM) constraints force a faster design and validation
closure. This in turn enforces novel ways of identifying and debugging
behavioral inconsistencies early in the design cycle. Addition of incremental
features and timing fixes may alter the legacy design behavior and would
inadvertently result in undesirable bugs. The most common method of verifying
the correctness of the changed design is to run a dynamic regression test suite
before and after the intended changes and compare the results, a method which
is not exhaustive. Modern Formal Verification (FV) techniques involving new
methods of proving Sequential Hardware Equivalence enabled a new set of
solutions for the given problem, with complete coverage guarantee. Formal
Equivalence can be applied for proving functional integrity after design
changes resulting from a wide variety of reasons, ranging from simple pipeline
optimizations to complex logic redistributions. We present here our experience
of successfully applying the RTL to RTL (RTL2RTL) Formal Verification across a
wide spectrum of problems on a Graphics design. The RTL2RTL FV enabled checking
the design sanity in a very short time, thus enabling faster and safer design
churn. The techniques presented in this paper are applicable to any complex
hardware design.
