  In previous work, we proposed a logic-based framework in which computation is
the execution of actions in an attempt to make reactive rules of the form if
antecedent then consequent true in a canonical model of a logic program
determined by an initial state, sequence of events, and the resulting sequence
of subsequent states. In this model-theoretic semantics, reactive rules are the
driving force, and logic programs play only a supporting role.
  In the canonical model, states, actions and other events are represented with
timestamps. But in the operational semantics, for the sake of efficiency,
timestamps are omitted and only the current state is maintained. State
transitions are performed reactively by executing actions to make the
consequents of rules true whenever the antecedents become true. This
operational semantics is sound, but incomplete. It cannot make reactive rules
true by preventing their antecedents from becoming true, or by proactively
making their consequents true before their antecedents become true.
  In this paper, we characterize the notion of reactive model, and prove that
the operational semantics can generate all and only such models. In order to
focus on the main issues, we omit the logic programming component of the
framework.
