  In this paper I present and critically discuss the main strategies that Bohr
used and could have used to fend off the charge that his interpretation does
not provide a clear-cut distinction between the classical and the quantum
domain. In particular, in the first part of the paper I reassess the main
arguments used by Bohr to advocate the indispensability of a classical
framework to refer to quantum phenomena. In this respect, by using a
distinction coming from an apparently unrelated philosophical corner, we could
say that Bohr is not a revisionist philosopher of physics but rather a
descriptivist one in the sense of Strawson. I will then go on discussing the
nature of the holistic link between classical measurement apparatuses and
observed system that he also advocated. The oft-repeated conclusion that Bohr's
interpretation of the quantum formalism is untenable can only be established by
giving his arguments as much force as possible, which is what I will try to do
in the following by remaining as faithful as possible to his published work.
