  Quantum nonlocality is presented often as the most remarkable and
inexplicable phenomenon known to modern science which was confirmed in the
experiments proving the violation of Bell Inequalities (BI). It has been known
already for a long time that the probabilistic models used to prove BI for spin
polarization correlation experiments (SPCE) are incompatible with the
experimental protocols of SPCE. In particular these models use a common
probability space together with joint probability distributions for various
incompatible coincidence experiments and/or conditional independence (Bell's
locality). Strangely enough these results are not known or simply neglected.
Therefore so called Bell's or quantum nonlocality has nothing to do with the
common notion of the non-locality and it should be rather called quantum
non-Kolmogorovness or quantum contextuality. We quickly explain the true
meaning of various Bell's locality assumptions and show that if local variables
describing the measuring instruments are correctly taken into consideration
then BI can no longer be proven. Of course we do not question the usefulness of
the long range correlations characterizing the entangled physical systems in
the domain of Quantum Information. However one should not forget that the
anti-correlations cannot be perfect, that the wave function should not be
treated as an attribute of the individual quantum system which can be change
instantaneously and that the unperformed experiments have no results.
