  In 1866 Gregor Mendel published a seminal paper containing the foundations of
modern genetics. In 1936 Ronald Fisher published a statistical analysis of
Mendel's data concluding that "the data of most, if not all, of the experiments
have been falsified so as to agree closely with Mendel's expectations." The
accusation gave rise to a controversy which has reached the present time. There
are reasonable grounds to assume that a certain unconscious bias was
systematically introduced in Mendel's experimentation. Based on this
assumption, a probability model that fits Mendel's data and does not offend
Fisher's analysis is given. This reconciliation model may well be the end of
the Mendel--Fisher controversy.
