  The rise of Generative AI (GenAI) brings about transformative potential
across sectors, but its dual-use nature also amplifies risks. Governments
globally are grappling with the challenge of regulating GenAI, balancing
innovation against safety. China, the United States (US), and the European
Union (EU) are at the forefront with initiatives like the Management of
Algorithmic Recommendations, the Executive Order, and the AI Act, respectively.
However, the rapid evolution of GenAI capabilities often outpaces the
development of comprehensive safety measures, creating a gap between regulatory
needs and technical advancements.
  A workshop co-organized by Google, University of Wisconsin, Madison
(UW-Madison), and Stanford University aimed to bridge this gap between GenAI
policy and technology. The diverse stakeholders of the GenAI space -- from the
public and governments to academia and industry -- make any safety measures
under consideration more complex, as both technical feasibility and regulatory
guidance must be realized. This paper summarizes the discussions during the
workshop which addressed questions, such as: How regulation can be designed
without hindering technological progress? How technology can evolve to meet
regulatory standards? The interplay between legislation and technology is a
very vast topic, and we don't claim that this paper is a comprehensive
treatment on this topic. This paper is meant to capture findings based on the
workshop, and hopefully, can guide discussion on this topic.
