  The question of whether people's experience in the world shapes conceptual
representation and lexical semantics is longstanding. Word-association,
feature-listing and similarity rating tasks aim to address this question but
require a subjective interpretation of the latent dimensions identified. In
this study, we introduce a supervised representational-alignment method that
(i) determines whether two groups of individuals share the same basis of a
certain category, and (ii) explains in what respects they differ. In applying
this method, we show that congenital blindness induces conceptual
reorganization in both a-modal and sensory-related verbal domains, and we
identify the associated semantic shifts. We first apply supervised
feature-pruning to a language model (GloVe) to optimize prediction accuracy of
human similarity judgments from word embeddings. Pruning identifies one subset
of retained GloVe features that optimizes prediction of judgments made by
sighted individuals and another subset that optimizes judgments made by blind.
A linear probing analysis then interprets the latent semantics of these
feature-subsets by learning a mapping from the retained GloVe features to 65
interpretable semantic dimensions. We applied this approach to seven semantic
domains, including verbs related to motion, sight, touch, and amodal verbs
related to knowledge acquisition. We find that blind individuals more strongly
associate social and cognitive meanings to verbs related to motion or those
communicating non-speech vocal utterances (e.g., whimper, moan). Conversely,
for amodal verbs, they demonstrate much sparser information. Finally, for some
verbs, representations of blind and sighted are highly similar. The study
presents a formal approach for studying interindividual differences in word
meaning, and the first demonstration of how blindness impacts conceptual
representation of everyday verbs.
