  There is a long way from `accuracy' to `precision' about {\bf CP} asymmetries
in the decays of beauty \& charm hadrons. (a) We have to apply consistent
parametrization of the CKM matrix. (b) Probing many-body final states (FS) is
{\em not} a back-up for understanding the underlying forces; to be realistic we
can hardly go beyond four-body FS. (c) Broken U-spin symmetry is a good tools
to describe spectroscopy of hadrons.However the landscape is very different for
weak transitions; the connection of U- \& V-spin symmetries are important. We
have to understand the differences between Penguin {\em operators} vs. Penguin
{\em diagrams}. (d) Collaborations of experimenters \& theorists are crucial
with {\em judgment}. There is a `hot' news from the conference ICHEP2016: LHCb
data show evidence of {\bf CP} asymmetries in the {\bf T}-odd moment from
$\Lambda_b^0 \to p \pi^-\pi^+\pi^-$. LHCb will follow this `road' with
$\Lambda_b^0 \to p \pi^-K^+K^-$, $\Lambda_b^0 \to p K^- \pi^+\pi^-$ \&
$\Lambda_b^0 \to p K^-K^+K^-$ in run-1. With much more data it is crucial to
probe its features in {\em regional} asymmetries. \\ A quote from Marinus, who
was a $\sim$ 468 AD student of Proklos, a well-known Neoplatonic philosopher:
"Only {\em being} good is one thing -- but good {\em doing} it is the other
one!"
