  Reports on experiments recently performed in Vienna [Erhard et al, Nature
Phys. 8, 185 (2012)] and Toronto [Rozema et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 100404
(2012)] include claims of a violation of Heisenberg's error-disturbance
relation. In contrast, we have presented and proven a Heisenberg-type relation
for joint measurements of position and momentum [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 160405
(2013)]. To resolve the apparent conflict, we formulate here a new general
trade-off relation for errors in qubit measurements, using the same concepts as
we did in the position-momentum case. We show that the combined errors in an
approximate joint measurement of a pair of +/-1 valued observables A,B are
tightly bounded from below by a quantity that measures the degree of
incompatibility of A and B. The claim of a violation of Heisenberg is shown to
fail as it is based on unsuitable measures of error and disturbance. Finally we
show how the experiments mentioned may directly be used to test our error
inequality.
