  We address the problem of learning a ranking by using adaptively chosen
pairwise comparisons. Our goal is to recover the ranking accurately but to
sample the comparisons sparingly. If all comparison outcomes are consistent
with the ranking, the optimal solution is to use an efficient sorting
algorithm, such as Quicksort. But how do sorting algorithms behave if some
comparison outcomes are inconsistent with the ranking? We give favorable
guarantees for Quicksort for the popular Bradley-Terry model, under natural
assumptions on the parameters. Furthermore, we empirically demonstrate that
sorting algorithms lead to a very simple and effective active learning
strategy: repeatedly sort the items. This strategy performs as well as
state-of-the-art methods (and much better than random sampling) at a minuscule
fraction of the computational cost.
