  Given two candidate models, and a set of target observations, we address the
problem of measuring the relative goodness of fit of the two models. We propose
two new statistical tests which are nonparametric, computationally efficient
(runtime complexity is linear in the sample size), and interpretable. As a
unique advantage, our tests can produce a set of examples (informative
features) indicating the regions in the data domain where one model fits
significantly better than the other. In a real-world problem of comparing GAN
models, the test power of our new test matches that of the state-of-the-art
test of relative goodness of fit, while being one order of magnitude faster.
