  In a previous paper of one of us [Europhys. Lett. 59 (2002), 330--336] the
validity of Greene's method for determining the critical constant of the
standard map (SM) was questioned on the basis of some numerical findings. Here
we come back to that analysis and we provide an interpretation of the numerical
results by showing that no contradiction is found with respect to Greene's
method. We show that the previous results based on the expansion in Lindstedt
series do correspond to the transition value but for a different map: the
semi-standard map (SSM). Moreover, we study the expansion obtained from the SM
and SSM by suppressing the small divisors. The first case turns out to be
related to Kepler's equation after a proper transformation of variables. In
both cases we give an analytical solution for the radius of convergence, that
represents the singularity in the complex plane closest to the origin. Also
here, the radius of convergence of the SM's analogue turns out to be lower than
the one of the SSM. However, despite the absence of small denominators these
two radii are lower than the ones of the true maps for golden mean winding
numbers. Finally, the analyticity domain and, in particular, the critical
constant for the two maps without small divisors are studied analytically and
numerically. The analyticity domain appears to be an perfect circle for the SSM
analogue, while it is stretched along the real axis for the SM analogue
yielding a critical constant that is larger than its radius of convergence.
