  Microtask crowdsourcing is increasingly critical to the creation of extremely
large datasets. As a result, crowd workers spend weeks or months repeating the
exact same tasks, making it necessary to understand their behavior over these
long periods of time. We utilize three large, longitudinal datasets of nine
million annotations collected from Amazon Mechanical Turk to examine claims
that workers fatigue or satisfice over these long periods, producing lower
quality work. We find that, contrary to these claims, workers are extremely
stable in their quality over the entire period. To understand whether workers
set their quality based on the task's requirements for acceptance, we then
perform an experiment where we vary the required quality for a large
crowdsourcing task. Workers did not adjust their quality based on the
acceptance threshold: workers who were above the threshold continued working at
their usual quality level, and workers below the threshold self-selected
themselves out of the task. Capitalizing on this consistency, we demonstrate
that it is possible to predict workers' long-term quality using just a glimpse
of their quality on the first five tasks.
