  Cosmic shear measurements have now improved to the point where they deserve
to be treated on par with CMB and galaxy clustering data for cosmological
parameter analysis, using the full measured aperture mass variance curve rather
than a mere phenomenological parametrization thereof. We perform a detailed
9-parameter analysis of recent lensing (RCS), CMB (up to Archeops) and galaxy
clustering (2dF) data, both separately and jointly. CMB and 2dF data are
consistent with a simple flat adiabatic scale-invariant model with
Omega_Lambda=0.72+/-0.09, omega_cdm=0.115+/- 0.013, omega_b=0.024+/-0.003, and
a hint of reionization around z~8. Lensing helps further tighten these
constraints, but reveals tension regarding the power spectrum normalization:
including the RCS survey results raises sigma8 significantly and forces other
parameters to uncomfortable values. Indeed, sigma8 is emerging as the currently
most controversial cosmological parameter, and we discuss possible resolutions
of this sigma8 problem. We also comment on the disturbing fact that many recent
analyses (including this one) obtain error bars smaller than the Fisher matrix
bound. We produce a CMB power spectrum combining all existing experiments, and
using it for a "MAP versus world" comparison next month will provide a powerful
test of how realistic the error estimates have been in the cosmology community.
