  Various adaptation methods, such as LoRA, prompts, and adapters, have been
proposed to enhance the performance of pre-trained vision-language models in
specific domains. The robustness of these adaptation methods against
distribution shifts have not been studied. In this study, we assess the
robustness of 11 widely-used adaptation methods across 4 vision-language
datasets under multimodal corruptions. Concretely, we introduce 7 benchmark
datasets, including 96 visual and 87 textual corruptions, to investigate the
robustness of different adaptation methods, the impact of available adaptation
examples, and the influence of trainable parameter size during adaptation. Our
analysis reveals that: 1) Adaptation methods are more sensitive to text
corruptions than visual corruptions. 2) Full fine-tuning does not consistently
provide the highest robustness; instead, adapters can achieve better robustness
with comparable clean performance. 3) Contrary to expectations, our findings
indicate that increasing the number of adaptation data and parameters does not
guarantee enhanced robustness; instead it results in even lower robustness. We
hope this study could benefit future research in the development of robust
multimodal adaptation methods. The benchmark, code, and dataset used in this
study can be accessed at https://adarobustness.github.io .
