  We set out a simulation to explore the follow-up of exoplanet candidates. We
look at comparing photometric (transit method) and spectroscopic (Doppler shift
method) techniques using three instruments: NGTS, HARPS and CORALIE. We take
into account precision of follow-up and required observing time in attempt to
rank each method for a given set of planetary system parameters. The methods
are assessed on two criteria, SNR of the detection and follow-up time before
characterisation. We find that different follow-up techniques are preferred for
different regions of parameter space. For SNR we find that the ratio of
spectroscopic to photometric SNR for a given system goes like
$R_p/P^{\frac{1}{3}}$. For follow-up time we find that photometry is favoured
for the shortest period systems ($<10$ d) as well as systems with small planet
radii. Spectroscopy is then preferred for systems with larger radius, and thus
more massive, planets (given our assumed mass-radius relationship). Finally, we
attempt to account for availability of telescopes and weight the two methods
accordingly.
