  Indexing highly repetitive collections has become a relevant problem with the
emergence of large repositories of versioned documents, among other
applications. These collections may reach huge sizes, but are formed mostly of
documents that are near-copies of others. Traditional techniques for indexing
these collections fail to properly exploit their regularities in order to
reduce space.
  We introduce new techniques for compressing inverted indexes that exploit
this near-copy regularity. They are based on run-length, Lempel-Ziv, or grammar
compression of the differential inverted lists, instead of the usual practice
of gap-encoding them. We show that, in this highly repetitive setting, our
compression methods significantly reduce the space obtained with classical
techniques, at the price of moderate slowdowns. Moreover, our best methods are
universal, that is, they do not need to know the versioning structure of the
collection, nor that a clear versioning structure even exists.
  We also introduce compressed self-indexes in the comparison. These are
designed for general strings (not only natural language texts) and represent
the text collection plus the index structure (not an inverted index) in
integrated form. We show that these techniques can compress much further, using
a small fraction of the space required by our new inverted indexes. Yet, they
are orders of magnitude slower.
