  Evolutionary robot systems offer two principal advantages: an advanced way of
developing robots through evolutionary optimization and a special research
platform to conduct what-if experiments regarding questions about evolution.
Our study sits at the intersection of these. We investigate the question ``What
if the 18th-century biologist Lamarck was not completely wrong and individual
traits learned during a lifetime could be passed on to offspring through
inheritance?'' We research this issue through simulations with an evolutionary
robot framework where morphologies (bodies) and controllers (brains) of robots
are evolvable and robots also can improve their controllers through learning
during their lifetime. Within this framework, we compare a Lamarckian system,
where learned bits of the brain are inheritable, with a Darwinian system, where
they are not. Analyzing simulations based on these systems, we obtain new
insights about Lamarckian evolution dynamics and the interaction between
evolution and learning. Specifically, we show that Lamarckism amplifies the
emergence of `morphological intelligence', the ability of a given robot body to
acquire a good brain by learning, and identify the source of this success:
`newborn' robots have a higher fitness because their inherited brains match
their bodies better than those in a Darwinian system.
