  Many geophysical and astrophysical phenomena are driven by turbulent fluid
dynamics, containing behaviors separated by tens of orders of magnitude in
scale. While direct simulations have made large strides toward understanding
geophysical systems, such models still inhabit modest ranges of the governing
parameters that are difficult to extrapolate to planetary settings. The
canonical problem of rotating Rayleigh-B\'enard convection provides an
alternate approach - isolating the fundamental physics in a reduced setting.
Theoretical studies and asymptotically-reduced simulations in rotating
convection have unveiled a variety of flow behaviors likely relevant to natural
systems, but still inaccessible to direct simulation. In lieu of this, several
new large-scale rotating convection devices have been designed to characterize
such behaviors. It is essential to predict how this potential influx of new
data will mesh with existing results. Surprisingly, a coherent framework of
predictions for extreme rotating convection has not yet been elucidated. In
this study, we combine asymptotic predictions, laboratory and numerical
results, and experimental constraints to build a heuristic framework for
cross-comparison between a broad range of rotating convection studies. We
categorize the diverse field of existing predictions in the context of
asymptotic flow regimes. We then consider the physical constraints that
determine the points of intersection between flow behavior predictions and
experimental accessibility. Applying this framework to several upcoming devices
demonstrates that laboratory studies may soon be able to characterize
geophysically-relevant flow regimes. These new data may transform our
understanding of geophysical and astrophysical turbulence, and the conceptual
framework developed herein should provide the theoretical infrastructure needed
for meaningful discussion of these results.
