  Considerable delays often exist between the discovery of a vulnerability and
the issue of a patch. One way to mitigate this window of vulnerability is to
use a configuration workaround, which prevents the vulnerable code from being
executed at the cost of some lost functionality -- but only if one is
available. Since program configurations are not specifically designed to
mitigate software vulnerabilities, we find that they only cover 25.2% of
vulnerabilities.
  To minimize patch delay vulnerabilities and address the limitations of
configuration workarounds, we propose Security Workarounds for Rapid Response
(SWRRs), which are designed to neutralize security vulnerabilities in a timely,
secure, and unobtrusive manner. Similar to configuration workarounds, SWRRs
neutralize vulnerabilities by preventing vulnerable code from being executed at
the cost of some lost functionality. However, the key difference is that SWRRs
use existing error-handling code within programs, which enables them to be
mechanically inserted with minimal knowledge of the program and minimal
developer effort. This allows SWRRs to achieve high coverage while still being
fast and easy to deploy.
  We have designed and implemented Talos, a system that mechanically
instruments SWRRs into a given program, and evaluate it on five popular Linux
server programs. We run exploits against 11 real-world software vulnerabilities
and show that SWRRs neutralize the vulnerabilities in all cases. Quantitative
measurements on 320 SWRRs indicate that SWRRs instrumented by Talos can
neutralize 75.1% of all potential vulnerabilities and incur a loss of
functionality similar to configuration workarounds in 71.3% of those cases. Our
overall conclusion is that automatically generated SWRRs can safely mitigate
2.1x more vulnerabilities, while only incurring a loss of functionality
comparable to that of traditional configuration workarounds.
