  Structure and parameters in a Bayesian network uniquely specify the
probability distribution of the modeled domain. The locality of both structure
and probabilistic information are the great benefits of Bayesian networks and
require the modeler to only specify local information. On the other hand this
locality of information might prevent the modeler - and even more any other
person - from obtaining a general overview of the important relationships
within the domain. The goal of the work presented in this paper is to provide
an "alternative" view on the knowledge encoded in a Bayesian network which
might sometimes be very helpful for providing insights into the underlying
domain. The basic idea is to calculate a mixture approximation to the
probability distribution represented by the Bayesian network. The mixture
component densities can be thought of as representing typical scenarios implied
by the Bayesian model, providing intuition about the basic relationships. As an
additional benefit, performing inference in the approximate model is very
simple and intuitive and can provide additional insights. The computational
complexity for the calculation of the mixture approximations criticaly depends
on the measure which defines the distance between the probability distribution
represented by the Bayesian network and the approximate distribution. Both the
KL-divergence and the backward KL-divergence lead to inefficient algorithms.
Incidentally, the latter is used in recent work on mixtures of mean field
solutions to which the work presented here is closely related. We show,
however, that using a mean squared error cost function leads to update
equations which can be solved using the junction tree algorithm. We conclude
that the mean squared error cost function can be used for Bayesian networks in
which inference based on the junction tree is tractable. For large networks,
however, one may have to rely on mean field approximations.
