  The solid nematic equivalent of the Fredericks transition is found to depend
on a critical field rather than a critical voltage as in the classical case.
This arises because director anchoring is principally to the solid rubbery
matrix of the nematic gel rather than to the sample surfaces. Moreover, above
the threshold field, we find a competition between quartic (soft) and
conventional harmonic elasticity which dictates the director response. By
including a small degree of initial director misorientation, the calculated
field variation of optical anisotropy agrees well with the conoscopy
measurements of Chang et al (Phys.Rev.E56, 595, 1997) of the electro-optical
response of nematic gels.
