  The Simulation Argument has gained significant traction in the public arena.
It has offered a hypothesis based on probabilistic analysis of its assumptions
that we are likely to exist within a computer simulation. This has been derived
from factors including the prediction of computing power, human existence,
extinction and population dynamics, and suggests a very large value for the
number of possible simulations within which we may exist. On evaluating this
argument through the application of tangible real-world evidence and
projections, it is possible to calculate real numerical solutions for the
Simulation Argument. This reveals a much smaller number of possible simulations
within which we may exist, and offers a novel practicable approach in which to
appraise the variety and multitude of conjectures and theories associated with
the Simulation Hypothesis.
