  We argue that the non-detection of oscillations in Procyon by the MOST
satellite reported by Matthews et al. (2004) is fully consistent with published
ground-based velocity observations of this star. We also examine the claims
that the MOST observations represent the best photometric precision so far
reported in the literature by about an order of magnitude and are the most
sensitive data set for asteroseismology available for any star other than the
Sun. These statements are not correct, with the most notable exceptions being
observations of oscillations in alpha Cen A that are far superior. We further
disagree that the hump of excess power seen repeatedly from velocity
observations of Procyon can be explained as an artefact caused by gaps in the
data. The MOST observations failed to reveal oscillations clearly because their
noise level is too high, possibly from scattered Earthlight in the instrument.
We did find an excess of strong peaks in the MOST amplitude spectrum that is
inconsistent with a simple noise source such as granulation, and may perhaps
indicate oscillations at roughly the expected level.
