  This paper discusses a possible resolution of the nonobjectivity-nonlocality
dilemma in quantum mechanics in 'the light of experimental tests of the Bell
inequality for two entangled photons and a Bell-like inequality for a single
neutron. My conclusion is that these experiments show that quantum mechanics is
nonobjective: that is, the values of physical observables cannot be assigned to
a system before measurement. Bell's assumption of nonlocality has to be
rejected as having no direct experimental confirmation, at least thus far. I
also consider the relationships between nonobjectivity and contextuality.
Specifically, I analyze the impact of the Kochen-Specker theorem on the problem
of contextuality of quantum observables. I argue that, just as von Neumann's
"no-go" theorem, the Kochen-Specker theorem is based on assumptions that do not
correspond to the real physical situation. Finally, I present a theory of
measurement based on a classical, purely wave model (pre-quantum classical
statistical field theory), a model that reproduces quantum probabilities. In
this model continuous fields are transformed into discrete clicks of detectors.
While this model is classical, it is nonobjective. In this case, nonobjectivity
is the result of the dependence of experimental outcomes on the context of
measurement, in accordance with Bohr's view.
