  While deep learning is an exciting new technique, the benefits of this method
need to be assessed with respect to its computational cost. This is
particularly important for deep learning since these learners need hours (to
weeks) to train the model. Such long training time limits the ability of (a)~a
researcher to test the stability of their conclusion via repeated runs with
different random seeds; and (b)~other researchers to repeat, improve, or even
refute that original work.
  For example, recently, deep learning was used to find which questions in the
Stack Overflow programmer discussion forum can be linked together. That deep
learning system took 14 hours to execute. We show here that applying a very
simple optimizer called DE to fine tune SVM, it can achieve similar (and
sometimes better) results. The DE approach terminated in 10 minutes; i.e. 84
times faster hours than deep learning method.
  We offer these results as a cautionary tale to the software analytics
community and suggest that not every new innovation should be applied without
critical analysis. If researchers deploy some new and expensive process, that
work should be baselined against some simpler and faster alternatives.
