  An extensive experimental and theoretical effort has led to a largely
complete mapping of the magnetic phase diagram of La_(2-x)Sr_xCuO_4, and a
microscopic model of the spin textures produced in the x < 0.05 regime has been
shown to be in agreement with this phase diagram. Here we use this same model
to derive a theory of the impurity-dominated, low temperature transport. Then,
we present an analysis of previously published data for two samples: x = 0.002
data from Chen et. al., and x = 0.04 data from Keimer et. al. We show that the
transport mechanisms in the two systems are the same, even though they are on
opposite sides of the observed insulator-to-metal transition. Our model of
impurity effects on the impurity band conduction, variable-range hopping
conduction, and coulomb gap conduction, is similar to that used to describe
doped semiconductors. However, for La_(2-x)Sr_xCuO_4 we find that in addition
to impurity-generated disorder effects, strong correlations are important and
must be treated on a equal level with disorder. On the basis of this work we
propose a phase diagram that is consistent with available magnetic and
transport experiments, and which connects the undoped parent compound with the
lowest x value for which La_(2-x)Sr_xCuO_4 is found to be superconducting, x
about 0.06.
