  The volume and velocity of information that gets generated online limits
current journalistic practices to fact-check claims at the same rate.
Computational approaches for fact checking may be the key to help mitigate the
risks of massive misinformation spread. Such approaches can be designed to not
only be scalable and effective at assessing veracity of dubious claims, but
also to boost a human fact checker's productivity by surfacing relevant facts
and patterns to aid their analysis. To this end, we present a novel,
unsupervised network-flow based approach to determine the truthfulness of a
statement of fact expressed in the form of a (subject, predicate, object)
triple. We view a knowledge graph of background information about real-world
entities as a flow network, and knowledge as a fluid, abstract commodity. We
show that computational fact checking of such a triple then amounts to finding
a "knowledge stream" that emanates from the subject node and flows toward the
object node through paths connecting them. Evaluation on a range of real-world
and hand-crafted datasets of facts related to entertainment, business, sports,
geography and more reveals that this network-flow model can be very effective
in discerning true statements from false ones, outperforming existing
algorithms on many test cases. Moreover, the model is expressive in its ability
to automatically discover several useful path patterns and surface relevant
facts that may help a human fact checker corroborate or refute a claim.
