  Analysis of strong gravitational lensing depends on software analysis of
observational data. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the behavior of
strong gravitational lens modeling software with changes in redshift. Four
different strong gravitational lens software modeling codes were directly
compared (Lenstool / glafic, two light traces mass codes, and GRALE / PixeLens,
two non-light traces mass codes) in the analysis of model data as well as
analysis of the giant gravitational quasar SDSSJ1004+4112. A generalized model
for time delay calculation shows that calculated time delay is proportional to
$D_{d}D_{s}/D_{ds}$.The percent change in time delays calculated for each
system at each redshift tested were compared with percent change in the value
of $D_{d}D_{s}/D_{ds}$. A simple point mass model was tested with each code.
Five models were used with a constant $z_{lens}$ and a varying $z_{source}$,
and five models with a constant $z_{source}$ and a varying $z_{lens}$. The
effects of changing geometry were similarly investigated for SDSSJ1004+4112. In
general, the changes in time delay were of a similar magnitude and direction
although, some calculated time delays varied by as much as 30 percent from
changes in $D_{d}D_{s}/D_{ds}$. Changes in calculated mass for the point mass
model with a constant $z_{source}$ were almost identical to changes in
$D_{d}D_{s}/D_{ds}$ for three of the four codes tested. These data demonstrate
the effect of changes in redshift on parameters calculated by each of the codes
as compared to changes in $D_{d}D_{s}/D_{ds}$. The paucity of existing direct
comparison studies of strong gravitational lensing supports the need for more
studies of this kind. These results show that even small changes in redshift
affects the calculation of time delay and mass, and that the effect on the
calculations is dependent on the particular software used.
