  Mobile applications, often simply called "apps", are increasingly widespread,
and we use them daily to perform a number of activities. Like all software,
apps must be adequately tested to gain confidence that they behave correctly.
Therefore, in recent years, researchers and practitioners alike have begun to
investigate ways to automate apps testing. In particular, because of Android's
open source nature and its large share of the market, a great deal of research
has been performed on input generation techniques for apps that run on the
Android operating systems. At this point in time, there are in fact a number of
such techniques in the literature, which differ in the way they generate
inputs, the strategy they use to explore the behavior of the app under test,
and the specific heuristics they use. To better understand the strengths and
weaknesses of these existing approaches, and get general insight on ways they
could be made more effective, in this paper we perform a thorough comparison of
the main existing test input generation tools for Android. In our comparison,
we evaluate the effectiveness of these tools, and their corresponding
techniques, according to four metrics: code coverage, ability to detect faults,
ability to work on multiple platforms, and ease of use. Our results provide a
clear picture of the state of the art in input generation for Android apps and
identify future research directions that, if suitably investigated, could lead
to more effective and efficient testing tools for Android.
