  The outcome of a functional genomics pipeline is usually a partial list of
genomic features, ranked by their relevance in modelling biological phenotype
in terms of a classification or regression model. Due to resampling protocols
or just within a meta-analysis comparison, instead of one list it is often the
case that sets of alternative feature lists (possibly of different lengths) are
obtained. Here we introduce a method, based on the algebraic theory of
symmetric groups, for studying the variability between lists ("list stability")
in the case of lists of unequal length. We provide algorithms evaluating
stability for lists embedded in the full feature set or just limited to the
features occurring in the partial lists. The method is demonstrated first on
synthetic data in a gene filtering task and then for finding gene profiles on a
recent prostate cancer dataset.
