  In this reply we clarify the main points of our manuscript and respond to the
critique in the Comment arXiv:2002.11514. In particular, we emphasize that our
conclusion "squeezing loses effectiveness in the deep quantum regime" does not
contradict the previous work arXiv:1801.10383, but instead adds to it, and
raises fundamental questions on classifying parameter regimes for quantum
synchronization. Moreover, we address the concern brought up on the validity of
the master equation in the deep quantum regime, and show that our
noise-enhanced synchronization differs from previous literature. Through
numerical examples, we also demonstrate that the choice of ansatz, while
appearing inconsistent, does not lead to erroneous conclusions. Lastly, we
expound on the physics of noise-boosted synchronization, and show that it is
indeed a genuine feature unique to the deep quantum regime. However, we note
that single photon dissipation is a more accurate term, and will move to using
that.
