  In a recent paper published last october 2015 by B.Hensen et al. [1] and in
two companion papers published last december 2015 by B.Hensen et al. [2] and by
L. Shalm et al. [3], the authors describe beautiful and complex experiments
aimed at testing the theorem of J. Bell (1965) [4] with measurements free of
the detection-loophole and the locality loophole that had never been closed
unquestionably in a single experiment. According to their authors, each
experiment, closing both loopholes, gives conclusive evidence in favor of
nonlocality. Here I will argue that this claim may be questionable, and that
such an evidence should be obtained by a different kind of experiments.
