  Recent arguments, involving entangled systems shared by sets of Wigner's
friend arrangements, allegedly show that the assumption that the experiments
performed by the friends yield definite outcomes, is incompatible with quantum
predictions. From this, it is concluded that the results of measurements cannot
be thought of as being actual or objective. Here, I show that these arguments
depend upon a mistaken assumption, regarding the ("mixed") correlations between
the results of the friends and those of "the Wigners", which leads to invalid
predictions. It is not, then, that the assumption of definite outcomes leads to
trouble, but that the results derived with such an assumption are contrasted
with faulty predictions. Next, I explore the more famous no-go theorems by
Frauchiger and Renner and by Brukner, on which these recent arguments are
motivated. Regarding the first, I show that, although it is cast in a different
form, it also rests on the mistaken assumption regarding "mixed"
correlations--rendering it invalid. Regarding Brukner's theorem, I point out
that it depends on the quite unattractive assumption of locality, a fact that
fully diminishes its force. Throughout, I illustrate my claims with explicit
calculations within pilot-wave theory.
