  We consider the paradigm of a black box AI system that makes life-critical
decisions. We propose an "arguing machines" framework that pairs the primary AI
system with a secondary one that is independently trained to perform the same
task. We show that disagreement between the two systems, without any knowledge
of underlying system design or operation, is sufficient to arbitrarily improve
the accuracy of the overall decision pipeline given human supervision over
disagreements. We demonstrate this system in two applications: (1) an
illustrative example of image classification and (2) on large-scale real-world
semi-autonomous driving data. For the first application, we apply this
framework to image classification achieving a reduction from 8.0% to 2.8% top-5
error on ImageNet. For the second application, we apply this framework to Tesla
Autopilot and demonstrate the ability to predict 90.4% of system disengagements
that were labeled by human annotators as challenging and needing human
supervision.
