  The benchmark for computation is typically given as Turing computability; the
ability for a computation to be performed by a Turing Machine. Many languages
exploit (indirect) encodings of Turing Machines to demonstrate their ability to
support arbitrary computation. However, these encodings are usually by
simulating the entire Turing Machine within the language, or by encoding a
language that does an encoding or simulation itself. This second category is
typical for process calculi that show an encoding of lambda-calculus (often
with restrictions) that in turn simulates a Turing Machine. Such approaches
lead to indirect encodings of Turing Machines that are complex, unclear, and
only weakly equivalent after computation. This paper presents an approach to
encoding Turing Machines into intensional process calculi that is faithful,
reduction preserving, and structurally equivalent. The encoding is demonstrated
in a simple asymmetric concurrent pattern calculus before generalised to
simplify infinite terms, and to show encodings into Concurrent Pattern Calculus
and Psi Calculi.
