  In standard Poincare and anti de Sitter SO(2,3) invariant theories,
antiparticles are related to negative energy solutions of covariant equations
while independent positive energy unitary irreducible representations (UIRs) of
the symmetry group are used for describing both a particle and its
antiparticle. Such an approach cannot be applied in de Sitter SO(1,4) invariant
theory. We argue that it would be more natural to require that (*) one UIR
should describe a particle and its antiparticle simultaneously. This would
automatically explain the existence of antiparticles and show that a particle
and its antiparticle are different states of the same object. If (*) is adopted
then among the above groups only the SO(1,4) one can be a candidate for
constructing elementary particle theory. It is shown that UIRs of the SO(1,4)
group can be interpreted in the framework of (*) and cannot be interpreted in
the standard way. By quantizing such UIRs and requiring that the energy should
be positive in the Poincare approximation, we conclude that i) elementary
particles can be only fermions. It is also shown that ii) C invariance is not
exact even in the free massive theory and iii) elementary particles cannot be
neutral. This gives a natural explanation of the fact that all observed neutral
states are bosons.
