  A finite group $G$ is a "non-DCI group" if there exist subsets $S_1$ and
$S_2$ of $G$, such that the associated Cayley digraphs
$C\overrightarrow{ay}(G;S_1)$ and $C\overrightarrow{ay}(G;S_2)$ are isomorphic,
but no automorphism of $G$ carries $S_1$ to $S_2$. Furthermore, $G$ is a
"non-CI group" if the subsets $S_1$ and $S_2$ can be chosen to be closed under
inverses, so we have undirected Cayley graphs $Cay(G;S_1)$ and $Cay(G;S_2)$.
  We show that if $p$ is a prime number, and the elementary abelian $p$-group
$(\mathbb{Z}_p)^r$ is a non-DCI group, then $(\mathbb{Z}_p)^{r+3}$ is a non-CI
group. In most cases, we can also show that $(\mathbb{Z}_p)^{r+2}$ is a non-CI
group. In particular, from Pablo Spiga's proof that $(\mathbb{Z}_p)^8$ is a
non-DCI group, we conclude that $(\mathbb{Z}_3)^{10}$ is a non-CI group. This
is the first example of a non-CI elementary abelian $3$-group.
