  High precision VLA flux density measurements for the lensed images of
0218+357 yield a time delay of 10.1(+1.5-1.6)days (95% confidence). This is
consistent with independent measurements carried out at the same epoch (Biggs
et al. 1999), lending confidence in the robustness of the time delay
measurement. However, since both measurements make use of the same features in
the light curves, it is possible that the effects of unmodelled processes, such
as scintillation or microlensing, are biasing both time delay measurements in
the same way. Our time delay estimates result in confidence intervals that are
somewhat larger than those of Biggs et al., probably because we adopt a more
general model of the source variability, allowing for constant and variable
components. When considered in relation to the lens mass model of Biggs et al.,
our best-fit time delay implies a Hubble constant of H_o = 71(+17-23) km/s-Mpc
for Omega_o=1 and lambda_o=0 (95% confidence; filled beam). This confidence
interval for H_o does not reflect systematic error, which may be substantial,
due to uncertainty in the position of the lens galaxy. We also measure the flux
ratio of the variable components of 0218+357, a measurement of a small region
that should more closely represent the true lens magnification ratio. We find
ratios of 3.2(+0.3-0.4) (95% confidence; 8 GHz) and 4.3(+0.5-0.8) (15 GHz).
Unlike the reported flux ratios on scales of 0.1", these ratios are not
strongly significantly different. We investigate the significance of apparent
differences in the variability properties of the two images of the background
active galactic nucleus. We conclude that the differences are not significant,
and that time series much longer than our 100-day time series will be required
to investigate propagation effects in this way.
