  By positing a universe where all events are determined by initial conditions,
superdeterminism as conceded by Bell frames correlations observed in quantum
measurements as the consequence of an inherently predetermined cosmic order
that shapes even our experimental choices. I use an axiomatic formulation of
superdeterminism to demonstrate that Bell overstated the scope of determinism
required. Assuming only the existence of a universe containing observers, I
show that determinism in just the observer scope is sufficient. I then discuss
how this sufficiency increases the theory's plausibility and suggest a path to
its integration with results from other disciplines.
