  Algorithmic decisions often result in scoring and ranking individuals to
determine credit worthiness, qualifications for college admissions and
employment, and compatibility as dating partners. While automatic and seemingly
objective, ranking algorithms can discriminate against individuals and
protected groups, and exhibit low diversity. Furthermore, ranked results are
often unstable --- small changes in the input data or in the ranking
methodology may lead to drastic changes in the output, making the result
uninformative and easy to manipulate. Similar concerns apply in cases where
items other than individuals are ranked, including colleges, academic
departments, or products.
  In this demonstration we present Ranking Facts, a Web-based application that
generates a "nutritional label" for rankings. Ranking Facts is made up of a
collection of visual widgets that implement our latest research results on
fairness, stability, and transparency for rankings, and that communicate
details of the ranking methodology, or of the output, to the end user. We will
showcase Ranking Facts on real datasets from different domains, including
college rankings, criminal risk assessment, and financial services.
