  In a recent eprint [1] it is argued that the experimental determinations of
the spin-dependent structure function g1 have been done incorrectly and that a
reanalysis of those data suggests that the original motivation to argue fora
"spin crisis", namely the small contribution of quark spins to the nucleon
spin, is invalid. In a subsequent note [2] the theoretical understanding, as it
has evolved from almost 30 years of theoretical and experimental scrutiny, has
been shortly summarised. In this short note, arguments are presented that the
line of reasoning in Ref. [1] does not apply, at least not for the Compass
data.
