  The need for revolution in modern physics is a well known and often broached
subject, however, the precision and success of current models narrows the
possible changes to such a great degree that there appears to be no major
change possible. We provide herein, the first step toward a possible solution
to this paradox via reinterpretation of the conceptual-theoretical framework
while still preserving the modern art and tools in an unaltered form. This
redivision of concepts and redistribution of the data can revolutionize
expectations of new experimental outcomes. This major change within finely
tuned constraints is made possible by the fact that numerous mathematically
equivalent theories were direct precursors to, and contemporaneous with, the
modern interpretations. In this first of a series of papers, historical
investigation of the conceptual lineage of modern theory reveals points of
exacting overlap in physical theories which, while now considered cross
discipline, originally split from a common source and can be reintegrated as a
singular science again. This revival of an older associative hierarchy,
combined with modern insights, can open new avenues for investigation. This
reintegration of cross-disciplinary theories and tools is defined as the
Neoclassical Interpretation.
