  For a real number $q\in(1,2)$ and $x\in[0,1/(q-1)]$, the infinite sequence
$(d_i)$ is called a \emph{$q$-expansion} of $x$ if $$
x=\sum_{i=1}^\infty\frac{d_i}{q^i},\quad d_i\in\{0,1\}\quad\textrm{for all}~
i\ge 1. $$ For $m=1, 2, \cdots$ or $\aleph_0$ we denote by $\mathcal{B}_m$ the
set of $q\in(1,2)$ such that there exists $x\in[0,1/(q-1)]$ having exactly $m$
different $q$-expansions. It was shown by Sidorov (2009) that $q_2:=\min
\mathcal{B}_2\approx1.71064$, and later asked by Baker (2015) whether
$q_2\in\mathcal{B}_{\aleph_0}$? In this paper we provide a negative answer to
this question and conclude that $\mathcal{B}_{\aleph_0} $ is not a closed set.
In particular, we give a complete description of $x\in[0,1/(q_2-1)]$ having
exactly two different $q_2$-expansions.
