  We are pleased to see that Jeckelmann has made many changes to the original
version of his comment on our paper as a result of our response. Here is a copy
of this powerful response that reveals problems in his previous results.
However, since this response was written before his revised comment came out,
new issues in his new comment, which will be commented if necessary, are not
discussed at present. Although some changes are made in his new comment as we
suggested in the response, we still see many other new and old misleading
statements and results. We kindly suggest the author correct them since
evidence is very compelling.
