  In this study, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of several quantum
transpilers, including the qiskit-braket-provider, the qBraid-SDK, and the
pytket extensions, focusing on critical metrics such as correctness, failure
rate, and transpilation time. Our results demonstrate that the
qiskit-braket-provider exhibits superior performance achieving a remarkably low
failure rate of 0.2%. the qiskit-braket-provider utilizes a combination of
one-to-one transpilation and gate decomposition for unsupported gates,
enhancing transpiler capabilities and speed. The qBraid-SDK offers a more
generalized approach, suitable for transpilation across multiple SDKs, albeit
with slower performance compared to the qiskit-braket-provider. The pytket
extensions, while fast, exhibit limitations in handling complex circuits due to
their one-to-one transpilation scheme. We also provide recommendations for
future development, advocating for the adoption of the method employed by the
qiskit-braket-provider to enhance transpiler capabilities and speed. This study
contributes to the growing body of knowledge in quantum transpiler
benchmarking, fostering interoperability and guiding the development of quantum
computing applications in a diverse hardware and software landscape.
