  The spread of ideas in the scientific community is often viewed as a
competition, in which good ideas spread further because of greater intrinsic
fitness, and publication venue and citation counts correlate with importance
and impact. However, relatively little is known about how structural factors
influence the spread of ideas, and specifically how where an idea originates
might influence how it spreads. Here, we investigate the role of faculty hiring
networks, which embody the set of researcher transitions from doctoral to
faculty institutions, in shaping the spread of ideas in computer science, and
the importance of where in the network an idea originates. We consider
comprehensive data on the hiring events of 5032 faculty at all 205
Ph.D.-granting departments of computer science in the U.S. and Canada, and on
the timing and titles of 200,476 associated publications. Analyzing five
popular research topics, we show empirically that faculty hiring can and does
facilitate the spread of ideas in science. Having established such a mechanism,
we then analyze its potential consequences using epidemic models to simulate
the generic spread of research ideas and quantify the impact of where an idea
originates on its longterm diffusion across the network. We find that research
from prestigious institutions spreads more quickly and completely than work of
similar quality originating from less prestigious institutions. Our analyses
establish the theoretical trade-offs between university prestige and the
quality of ideas necessary for efficient circulation. Our results establish
faculty hiring as an underlying mechanism that drives the persistent epistemic
advantage observed for elite institutions, and provide a theoretical lower
bound for the impact of structural inequality in shaping the spread of ideas in
science.
