  Deconstruction of the theme of the 2017 FQXi essay contest is already an
interesting exercise in its own right: Teleology is rarely useful in physics
--- the only known mainstream physics example (black hole event horizons) has a
very mixed score-card --- so the "goals" and "aims and intentions" alluded to
in the theme of the 2017 FQXi essay contest are already somewhat pushing the
limits. Furthermore, "aims and intentions" certainly carries the implication of
consciousness, and opens up a whole can of worms related to the mind-body
problem. As for "mindless mathematical laws", that allusion is certainly in
tension with at least some versions of the "mathematical universe hypothesis".
Finally "wandering towards a goal" again carries the implication of
consciousness, with all its attendant problems.
  In this essay I will argue, simply because we do not yet have any really good
mathematical or physical theory of consciousness, that the theme of this essay
contest is premature, and unlikely to lead to any resolution that would be
widely accepted in the mathematics or physics communities.
