  A conventional wisdom often perpetuated in the literature states that: (i) a
3+1 decomposition of space-time into space and time is synonymous with the
canonical treatment and this decomposition is essential for any Hamiltonian
formulation of General Relativity (GR); (ii) the canonical treatment
unavoidably breaks the symmetry between space and time in GR and the resulting
algebra of constraints is not the algebra of four-dimensional diffeomorphism;
(iii) according to some authors this algebra allows one to derive only spatial
diffeomorphism or, according to others, a specific field-dependent and
non-covariant four-dimensional diffeomorphism; (iv) the analyses of Dirac
[Proc. Roy. Soc. A 246 (1958) 333] and of ADM [Arnowitt, Deser and Misner, in
"Gravitation: An Introduction to Current Research" (1962) 227] of the canonical
structure of GR are equivalent. We provide some general reasons why these
statements should be questioned. Points (i-iii) have been shown to be incorrect
in [Kiriushcheva et al., Phys. Lett. A 372 (2008) 5101] and now we thoroughly
re-examine all steps of the Dirac Hamiltonian formulation of GR. We show that
points (i-iii) above cannot be attributed to the Dirac Hamiltonian formulation
of GR. We also demonstrate that ADM and Dirac formulations are related by a
transformation of phase-space variables from the metric $g_{\mu\nu}$ to lapse
and shift functions and the three-metric $g_{km}$, which is not canonical. This
proves that point (iv) is incorrect. Points (i-iii) are mere consequences of
using a non-canonical change of variables and are not an intrinsic property of
either the Hamilton-Dirac approach to constrained systems or Einstein's theory
itself.
