  This article is set in the field of regulation networks modeled by discrete
dynamical systems. It focuses on Boolean automata networks. In such networks,
there are many ways to update the states of every element. When this is done
deterministically, at each time step of a discretised time flow and according
to a predefined order, we say that the network is updated according to
block-sequential update schedule (blocks of elements are updated sequentially
while, within each block, the elements are updated synchronously). Many
studies, for the sake of simplicity and with some biologically motivated
reasons, have concentrated on networks updated with one particular
block-sequential update schedule (more often the synchronous/parallel update
schedule or the sequential update schedules). The aim of this paper is to give
an argument formally proven and inspired by biological considerations in favour
of the fact that the choice of a particular update schedule does not matter so
much in terms of the possible and likely dynamical behaviours that networks may
display.
