  In his article in Science, Nicolas Gisin claimed that quantum correlations
emerge from outside space time. We explain that they are due to space time
symmetries. This paper is a critical review of metaphysical conclusions found
in many recent articles. It advocates the importance of contextuality, Einstein
causality and global symmetries. Bell tests allow only rejecting probabilistic
coupling provided by a local hidden variable model, but they do not justify
metaphysical speculations about quantum nonlocality and objects which know
about each other state, even when separated by large distances. The violation
of Bell inequalities in physics and in cognitive science can be explained using
the notion of Bohr contextuality. If contextual variables, describing varying
experimental contexts, are correctly incorporated into a probabilistic model,
then the Bell and CHSH inequalities cannot be proven and nonlocal correlations
may be explained in an intuitive way. We also elucidate the meaning of
statistical independence assumption incorrectly called free choice, measurement
independence or no conspiracy. Since correlation does not imply causation, the
violation of statistical independence should be called contextuality and it
does not restrict the experimenter freedom of choice. Therefore, contrary to
what is believed, closing the freedom of choice loophole does not close the
contextuality loophole.
