  We present non-parametric radial mass profiles for ten QSO strong lensing
galaxies. Five of the galaxies have profiles close to $\rho(r)\propto r^{-2}$,
while the rest are closer to r^{-1}, consistent with an NFW profile. The former
are all relatively isolated early-types and dominated by their stellar light.
The latter --though the modeling code did not know this-- are either in
clusters, or have very high mass-to-light, suggesting dark-matter dominant
lenses (one is a actually pair of merging galaxies). The same models give
$H_0^{-1} = 15.2_{-1.7}^{+2.5}\Gyr$ ($H_0 = 64_{-9}^{+8} \legacy$), consistent
with a previous determination. When tested on simulated lenses taken from a
cosmological hydrodynamical simulation, our modeling pipeline recovers both H_0
and $\rho(r)$ within estimated uncertainties. Our result is contrary to some
recent claims that lensing time delays imply either a low H_0 or galaxy
profiles much steeper than r^{-2}. We diagnose these claims as resulting from
an invalid modeling approximation: that small deviations from a power-law
profile have a small effect on lensing time-delays. In fact, as we show using
using both perturbation theory and numerical computation from a
galaxy-formation simulation, a first-order perturbation of an isothermal lens
can produce a zeroth-order change in the time delays.
