  We prove that, assuming the exponential time hypothesis, finding an
\epsilon-approximately optimal symmetric signaling scheme in a two-player
zero-sum game requires quasi-polynomial time. This is tight by [Cheng et al.,
FOCS'15] and resolves an open question of [Dughmi, FOCS'14]. We also prove that
finding a multiplicative approximation is NP-hard.
  We also introduce a new model where a dishonest signaler may publicly commit
to use one scheme, but post signals according to a different scheme. For this
model, we prove that even finding a (1-2^{-n})-approximately optimal scheme is
NP-hard.
