  Bibliometric measures derived from citation counts are increasingly being
used as a research evaluation tool. Their strengths and weaknesses have been
widely analyzed in the literature and are often subject of vigorous debate. We
believe there are a few fundamental issues related to the impact of the web
that are not taken into account with the importance they deserve. We focus on
evaluation of researchers, but several of our arguments may be applied also to
evaluation of research institutions as well as of journals and conferences.
