  We aim to design strategies for sequential decision making that adjust to the
difficulty of the learning problem. We study this question both in the setting
of prediction with expert advice, and for more general combinatorial decision
tasks. We are not satisfied with just guaranteeing minimax regret rates, but we
want our algorithms to perform significantly better on easy data. Two popular
ways to formalize such adaptivity are second-order regret bounds and quantile
bounds. The underlying notions of 'easy data', which may be paraphrased as "the
learning problem has small variance" and "multiple decisions are useful", are
synergetic. But even though there are sophisticated algorithms that exploit one
of the two, no existing algorithm is able to adapt to both.
  In this paper we outline a new method for obtaining such adaptive algorithms,
based on a potential function that aggregates a range of learning rates (which
are essential tuning parameters). By choosing the right prior we construct
efficient algorithms and show that they reap both benefits by proving the first
bounds that are both second-order and incorporate quantiles.
