  Disaster summarization approaches provide an overview of the important
information posted during disaster events on social media platforms, such as,
Twitter. However, the type of information posted significantly varies across
disasters depending on several factors like the location, type, severity, etc.
Verification of the effectiveness of disaster summarization approaches still
suffer due to the lack of availability of good spectrum of datasets along with
the ground-truth summary. Existing approaches for ground-truth summary
generation (ground-truth for extractive summarization) relies on the wisdom and
intuition of the annotators. Annotators are provided with a complete set of
input tweets from which a subset of tweets is selected by the annotators for
the summary. This process requires immense human effort and significant time.
Additionally, this intuition-based selection of the tweets might lead to a high
variance in summaries generated across annotators. Therefore, to handle these
challenges, we propose a hybrid (semi-automated) approach (PORTRAIT) where we
partly automate the ground-truth summary generation procedure. This approach
reduces the effort and time of the annotators while ensuring the quality of the
created ground-truth summary. We validate the effectiveness of PORTRAIT on 5
disaster events through quantitative and qualitative comparisons of
ground-truth summaries generated by existing intuitive approaches, a
semi-automated approach, and PORTRAIT. We prepare and release the ground-truth
summaries for 5 disaster events which consist of both natural and man-made
disaster events belonging to 4 different countries. Finally, we provide a study
about the performance of various state-of-the-art summarization approaches on
the ground-truth summaries generated by PORTRAIT using ROUGE-N F1-scores.
