  FrameNet is a computational linguistics resource composed of semantic frames,
high-level concepts that represent the meanings of words. In this paper, we
present an approach to gather frame disambiguation annotations in sentences
using a crowdsourcing approach with multiple workers per sentence to capture
inter-annotator disagreement. We perform an experiment over a set of 433
sentences annotated with frames from the FrameNet corpus, and show that the
aggregated crowd annotations achieve an F1 score greater than 0.67 as compared
to expert linguists. We highlight cases where the crowd annotation was correct
even though the expert is in disagreement, arguing for the need to have
multiple annotators per sentence. Most importantly, we examine cases in which
crowd workers could not agree, and demonstrate that these cases exhibit
ambiguity, either in the sentence, frame, or the task itself, and argue that
collapsing such cases to a single, discrete truth value (i.e. correct or
incorrect) is inappropriate, creating arbitrary targets for machine learning.
