  Aims. Sunspot number is a benchmark series in many studies, but may still
contain inhomogeneities and inconsistencies. In particular, an essential
discrepancy exists between the two main sunspot number series, Wolf (WSN) and
group (GSN) sunspot numbers, before 1848. The source of this discrepancy has so
far remained unresolved. However, the recently digitized series of solar
observations in 1825-1867 by Samuel Heinrich Schwabe, who was the primary
observer of the WSN before 1848, makes such an assessment possible. Methods. We
construct sunspot series, similar to WSN and GSN, but using only Schwabe's
data. These series, called WSN-S and GSN-S, respectively, were compared with
the original WSN and GSN series for the period 1835-1867 to look for possible
inhomogeneities. Results. We show that: (1) The GSN series is homogeneous and
consistent with the Schwabe data throughout the entire studied period; (2) The
WSN series decreases by roughly ~20% around 1848 caused by the change of the
primary observer from Schwabe to Wolf and an inappropriate individual
correction factor used for Schwabe in the WSN; (3) This implies a major
inhomogeneity in the WSN, which needs to be corrected by reducing its values by
20% before 1848; (4) The corrected WSN series is in good agreement with the GSN
series. This study supports the earlier conclusions that the GSN series is more
consistent and homogeneous in the earlier part than the WSN series.
