  We present partial strategyproofness, a new, relaxed notion of
strategyproofness for studying the incentive properties of non-strategyproof
assignment mechanisms. Informally, a mechanism is partially strategyproof if it
makes truthful reporting a dominant strategy for those agents whose preference
intensities differ sufficiently between any two objects. We demonstrate that
partial strategyproofness is axiomatically motivated and yields a parametric
measure for "how strategyproof" an assignment mechanism is. We apply this new
concept to derive novel insights about the incentive properties of the
probabilistic serial mechanism and different variants of the Boston mechanism.
