  The in-situ characterization of moon-magnetosphere interactions at Jupiter
and the mapping of moon auroral footpaths require accurate global models of the
magnetospheric magnetic field. In this study, we compare the ability of two
widely-used current sheet models, Khurana-2005 (KK2005) and Connerney-2020
(CON2020) combined with the most recent measurements acquired at low, medium,
and high latitudes. With the adjustments of the KK2005 model to JRM33, we show
that in the outer and middle magnetosphere (R>15RJ), JRM33+KK2005 is found to
be the best model to reproduce the magnetic field observations of Galileo and
Juno as it accounts for local time effects. JRM33+CON2020 gives the most
accurate representation of the inner magnetosphere. This finding is drawn from
comparisons with Juno in-situ magnetic field measurements and confirmed by
contrasting the timing of the crossings of the Io, Europa, and Ganymede flux
tubes identified in the Juno particles data with the two model estimates.
JRM33+CON2020 also maps more accurately the UV auroral footpath of Io, Europa,
and Ganymede observed by Juno than JRM33+KK2005. The JRM33+KK2005 model
predicts a local time asymmetry in position of the moons' footprints, which is
however not detected in Juno's UV measurements.This could indicate that local
time effects on the magnetic field are marginal at the orbital locations of Io,
Europa, and Ganymede. Finally, the accuracy of the models and their predictions
as a function of hemisphere, local time, and longitude is explored.
