  Search engines could consistently favor certain values over the others, which
is considered as biased due to the built-in infrastructures. Many studies have
been dedicated to detect, control, and mitigate the impacts of the biases from
the perspectives of search engines themselves. In our study, we take the
perspective from end-users to analyze their perceptions of search engine biases
and their satisfaction when the biases are regulated. In the study, we paired a
real search page from search engine Bing with a synthesized page that has more
diversities in the results (i.e. less biased). Both pages show the top-10
search items given search queries and we asked participants which one do they
prefer and why do they prefer the one selected. Statistical analyses revealed
that overall, participants prefer the original Bing pages and the locations
where the diversities are introduced are also associated with users'
preferences. We found out that users prefer results that are more consistent
and relevant to the search queries. Introducing diversities undermines the
relevance of the search results and impairs users' satisfaction to some degree.
Additionally, we confirmed that users tend to pay more attention to the top
portion of the results than the bottom ones.
