  Linguistically diverse datasets are critical for training and evaluating
robust machine learning systems, but data collection is a costly process that
often requires experts. Crowdsourcing the process of paraphrase generation is
an effective means of expanding natural language datasets, but there has been
limited analysis of the trade-offs that arise when designing tasks. In this
paper, we present the first systematic study of the key factors in
crowdsourcing paraphrase collection. We consider variations in instructions,
incentives, data domains, and workflows. We manually analyzed paraphrases for
correctness, grammaticality, and linguistic diversity. Our observations provide
new insight into the trade-offs between accuracy and diversity in crowd
responses that arise as a result of task design, providing guidance for future
paraphrase generation procedures.
