  In 2008 I thought I found a proof of the Riemann Hypothesis, but there was an
error. In the Spring 2020 I believed to have fixed the error, but it cannot be
fixed. I describe here where the error was. It took me several days to find the
error in a careful checking before a possible submission to a payable review
offered by one leading journal. There were three simple lemmas and one simple
theorem, all were correct, yet there was an error: what Lemma 2 proved was not
exactly what Lemma 3 needed. So, it was the connection of the lemmas. This
paper came out empty, but I have found a different proof of the Riemann
Hypothesis and it seems so far correct. In the discussion at the end of this
paper I raise a matter that I think is of importance to the review process in
mathematics.
