  We inspect the model-independent study of practical Dirac Majorana confusion
theorem (pDMCT) -- a wide spread belief that the difference between Dirac and
Majorana neutrinos via any kinematical observable would be practically
impossible to determine because of the difference only being proportional to
the square of neutrino mass -- in context of processes that have at least a
neutrino antineutrino pair in their final state. We scrutinize the domain of
applicability of pDMCT and also highlight those aspects that are often
misunderstood. We try to clarify some of the frequently used concepts that are
used to assert pDMCT as a generic feature irrespective of the process, or
observable, such as the existence of any analytic continuity between Dirac and
Majorana neutrinos in the limit mass(neutrino) -> 0. In summary, we illustrate
that pDMCT is not any fundamental property of neutrinos, instead, it is a
phenomenological feature of neutrino non-observation, depending on models and
processes.
