  We look at substructural calculi from a game semantic point of view, guided
by certain intuitions about resource conscious and, more specifically, cost
conscious reasoning. To this aim, we start with a game, where player I defends
a claim corresponding to a (single-conclusion) sequent, while player II tries
to refute that claim. Branching rules for additive connectives are modeled by
choices of II, while branching for multiplicative connectives leads to
splitting the game into parallel subgames, all of which have to be won by
player I to succeed. The game comes into full swing by adding cost labels to
assumptions, and a corresponding budget. Different proofs of the same
end-sequent are interpreted as more or less expensive strategies for I to
defend the corresponding claim. This leads to a new kind of labelled calculus,
which can be seen as a fragment of SELL (subexponential linear logic). Finally,
we generalize the concept of costs in proofs by using a semiring structure,
illustrate our interpretation by examples and investigate some
proof-theoretical properties.
