  Moral rhetoric plays a fundamental role in how we perceive and interpret the
information we receive, greatly influencing our decision-making process.
Especially when it comes to controversial social and political issues, our
opinions and attitudes are hardly ever based on evidence alone. The Moral
Foundations Dictionary (MFD) was developed to operationalize moral values in
the text. In this study, we present MoralStrength, a lexicon of approximately
1,000 lemmas, obtained as an extension of the Moral Foundations Dictionary,
based on WordNet synsets. Moreover, for each lemma it provides with a
crowdsourced numeric assessment of Moral Valence, indicating the strength with
which a lemma is expressing the specific value. We evaluated the predictive
potentials of this moral lexicon, defining three utilization approaches of
increased complexity, ranging from lemmas' statistical properties to a deep
learning approach of word embeddings based on semantic similarity. Logistic
regression models trained on the features extracted from MoralStrength,
significantly outperformed the current state-of-the-art, reaching an F1-score
of 87.6% over the previous 62.4% (p-value<0.01), and an average F1-Score of
86.25% over six different datasets. Such findings pave the way for further
research, allowing for an in-depth understanding of moral narratives in text
for a wide range of social issues.
