  People who by training end up dealing with probabilities ("statisticians")
roughly fall into one of two camps. One is either a frequentist or a Bayesian.
To a scientist, who needs to use probabilities to make sense of the real world,
this division seems sometimes baffling. I will argue that science mostly deals
with Bayesian questions. Yet the dominance of frequentist ideas in statistics
points many scientists in the wrong statistical direction.
