  We revisit the various measures of naturalness for models of weak scale
supersymmetry including 1. electroweak (EW) naturalness, 2. naturalness via
sensitivity to high scale parameters (EENZ/BG), 3. sensitivity of Higgs soft
term due to high scale (HS) radiative corrections and 4. stringy naturalness
(SN) from the landscape. The EW measure is most conservative and seems
unavoidable; it is also model independent in that its value is fixed only by
the weak scale spectra which ensues, no matter which model is used to generate
it. The EENZ/BG measure is ambiguous depending on which ``parameters of
ignorance'' one includes in the low energy effective field theory (LE-EFT). For
models with calculable soft breaking terms, then the EENZ/BG measure reduces to
the tree-level EW measure. The HS measure began life as a figurative expression
and probably shouldn't be taken more seriously than that. SN is closely related
to EW naturalness via the atomic principle, although it is also sensitive to
the distribution of soft terms on the landscape. If the landscape favors large
soft terms, as in a power law distribution, then it favors m(h) ~ 125 GeV along
with sparticles beyond present LHC reach. In this context, SN appears as a
probability measure where more natural models are expected to be more prevalent
on the landscape than finetuned models. We evaluate by how much the different
measures vary against one another with an eye to determining by how much they
may overestimate finetuning; we find overestimates can range up to a factor of
over 1000. In contrast to much of the literature, we expect the string
landscape to favor EW natural SUSY models over finetuned models so that the
landscape is not an alternative to naturalness.
