  Competition between varying ideas, people and institutions fuels the dynamics
of socio-economic systems. Numerous analyses of the empirical data extracted
from different financial markets have established a consistent set of stylized
facts describing statistical signatures of the competition in the financial
markets. Having an established and consistent set of stylized facts helps to
set clear goals for theoretical models to achieve. Despite similar abundance of
empirical analyses in sociophysics, there is no consistent set of stylized
facts describing the opinion dynamics. In this contribution we consider the
parties' vote share distributions observed during the Lithuanian parliamentary
elections. We show that most of the time empirical vote share distributions
could be well fitted by numerous different distributions. While discussing this
peculiarity we provide arguments, including a simple agent-based model, on why
the beta distribution could be the best choice to fit the parties' vote share
distributions.
