  Functional logic programming (FLP) languages use non-terminating and
non-confluent constructor systems (CS's) as programs in order to define
non-strict non-determi-nistic functions. Two semantic alternatives have been
usually considered for parameter passing with this kind of functions: call-time
choice and run-time choice. While the former is the standard choice of modern
FLP languages, the latter lacks some properties---mainly
compositionality---that have prevented its use in practical FLP systems.
Traditionally it has been considered that call-time choice induces a singular
denotational semantics, while run-time choice induces a plural semantics. We
have discovered that this latter identification is wrong when pattern matching
is involved, and thus we propose two novel compositional plural semantics for
CS's that are different from run-time choice.
  We study the basic properties of our plural semantics---compositionality,
polarity, monotonicity for substitutions, and a restricted form of the bubbling
property for constructor systems---and the relation between them and to
previous proposals, concluding that these semantics form a hierarchy in the
sense of set inclusion of the set of computed values. We have also identified a
class of programs characterized by a syntactic criterion for which the proposed
plural semantics behave the same, and a program transformation that can be used
to simulate one of them by term rewriting. At the practical level, we study how
to use the expressive capabilities of these semantics for improving the
declarative flavour of programs. We also propose a language which combines
call-time choice and our plural semantics, that we have implemented in Maude.
The resulting interpreter is employed to test several significant examples
showing the capabilities of the combined semantics.
  To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP)
