  This note is a part of my efforts for getting rid of nonlocality from quantum
mechanics (QM). Quantum nonlocality is two faced Janus, one face is L\"uders
projection nonlocality, another face is Bell nonlocality. This paper is devoted
to disillusion of the latter. The main casualty of Bell's model with hidden
variables is that it straightforwardly contradicts to the Heinsenberg's
uncertainty and generally Bohr's complementarity principles. Thus, we do not
criticize the derivation or interpretation of the Bell inequality (as was done
by numerous authors). Our critique is directed against the model as it is. The
original Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) argument was based on the Heinseberg's
principle, but EPR did not question it. Hence, the arguments of EPR and Bell
differ crucially. It is worth to find the physical seed of the aforementioned
principles. This is the {\it quantum postulate}: the existence of indivisible
quantum of action. Bell's approach with hidden variable straightforwardly
implies rejection of the quantum postulate. Heisenberg compared the quantum
postulate with constancy of light's velocity in special relativity. Thus
attempts to explain long distance correlations within the Bell model can be
compared with attempts to construct models violating the laws of relativity
theory. Following Zeilinger, I search for the fundamental principles of quantum
mechanics (QM) similar to the principles of relativity and consider the quantum
action and complementarity principles as such principles.
