  Given graphs $G$ and $H$, $G$ is $H$-saturated if $H$ is not a subgraph of
$G$, but for all $e \notin E(G)$, $H$ appears as a subgraph of $G + e$. While
for every $n \ge |V(H)|$, there exists an $n$-vertex graph that is
$H$-saturated, the same does not hold for induced subgraphs. That is, there
exist graphs $H$ and values of $n \ge |V(H)|$ for which every $n$-vertex graph
$G$ either contains $H$ as an induced subgraph, or there exists $e \notin E(G)$
such that $G + e$ does not contain $H$ as an induced subgraph. To circumvent
this, Martin and Smith make use of trigraphs when introducing the concept of
induced saturation and the induced saturation number of graphs. This allows for
edges that can be included or excluded when searching for an induced copy of H,
and the induced saturation number is the minimum number of such edges that are
required.
  In this paper, we show that the induced saturation number of many common
graphs is zero. Consequently, this yields graphs, instead of trigraphs, that
are H-induced-saturated. We introduce a new parameter for such graphs,
indsat*(n;H), which is the minimum number of edges in an H-induced-saturated
graph on n vertices. We provide bounds on indsat*(n;H) for many graphs. In
particular, we determine indsat*(n;paw) completely, and indsat*(n;$K_{1,3}$)
for infinitely many n.
