  Parameter tuning is recognized today as a crucial ingredient when tackling an
optimization problem. Several meta-optimization methods have been proposed to
find the best parameter set for a given optimization algorithm and (set of)
problem instances. When the objective of the optimization is some scalar
quality of the solution given by the target algorithm, this quality is also
used as the basis for the quality of parameter sets. But in the case of
multi-objective optimization by aggregation, the set of solutions is given by
several single-objective runs with different weights on the objectives, and it
turns out that the hypervolume of the final population of each single-objective
run might be a better indicator of the global performance of the aggregation
method than the best fitness in its population. This paper discusses this issue
on a case study in multi-objective temporal planning using the evolutionary
planner DaE-YAHSP and the meta-optimizer ParamILS. The results clearly show how
ParamILS makes a difference between both approaches, and demonstrate that
indeed, in this context, using the hypervolume indicator as ParamILS target is
the best choice. Other issues pertaining to parameter tuning in the proposed
context are also discussed.
