  We introduce seven foundational principles for creating a culture of
constructive criticism in computational legal studies. Beginning by challenging
the current perception of papers as the primary scholarly output, we call for a
more comprehensive interpretation of publications. We then suggest to make
these publications computationally reproducible, releasing all of the data and
all of the code all of the time, on time, and in the most functioning form
possible. Subsequently, we invite constructive criticism in all phases of the
publication life cycle. We posit that our proposals will help form our field,
and float the idea of marking this maturity by the creation of a modern
flagship publication outlet for computational legal studies.
