  Modelling compositional meaning for sentences using empirical distributional
methods has been a challenge for computational linguists. We implement the
abstract categorical model of Coecke et al. (arXiv:1003.4394v1 [cs.CL]) using
data from the BNC and evaluate it. The implementation is based on unsupervised
learning of matrices for relational words and applying them to the vectors of
their arguments. The evaluation is based on the word disambiguation task
developed by Mitchell and Lapata (2008) for intransitive sentences, and on a
similar new experiment designed for transitive sentences. Our model matches the
results of its competitors in the first experiment, and betters them in the
second. The general improvement in results with increase in syntactic
complexity showcases the compositional power of our model.
