  Rodney Brooks (1991) put forth the idea that during an agent's interaction
with its environment, representations of the world often stand in the way.
Instead, using the world as its own best model, i.e. interacting with it
directly without making models, often leads to better and more natural
behavior. The same perspective can be applied to representations of the agent's
body. I analyze different examples from biology -- octopus and humans in
particular -- and compare them with robots and their body models. At one end of
the spectrum, the octopus, a highly intelligent animal, largely relies on the
mechanical properties of its arms and peripheral nervous system. No central
representations or maps of its body were found in its central nervous system.
Primate brains do contain areas dedicated to processing body-related
information and different body maps were found. Yet, these representations are
still largely implicit and distributed and some functionality is also offloaded
to the periphery. Robots, on the other hand, rely almost exclusively on their
body models when planning and executing behaviors. I analyze the pros and cons
of these different approaches and propose what may be the best solution for
robots of the future.
