  Over the past 10 years stakeholders across the scholarly communications
community have invested significantly not only to increase the adoption of
ORCID adoption by researchers, but also to build the the broader
infrastructures that are needed both to support ORCID and to benefit from it.
These parallel efforts have fostered the emergence of "research information
citizenry", which comprises, but is not limited to, researchers, publishers,
funders, and institutions. This paper takes a scientometric approach to
investigating how effectively ORCID roles and responsibilities within this
citizenry have been adopted. Focusing specifically on researchers, publishers,
and funders, ORCID behaviours are measured against the approximated research
world represented by the Dimensions dataset.
