  Algorithms that use hardware transactional memory (HTM) must provide a
software-only fallback path to guarantee progress. The design of the fallback
path can have a profound impact on performance. If the fallback path is allowed
to run concurrently with hardware transactions, then hardware transactions must
be instrumented, adding significant overhead. Otherwise, hardware transactions
must wait for any processes on the fallback path, causing concurrency
bottlenecks, or move to the fallback path. We introduce an approach that
combines the best of both worlds. The key idea is to use three execution paths:
an HTM fast path, an HTM middle path, and a software fallback path, such that
the middle path can run concurrently with each of the other two. The fast path
and fallback path do not run concurrently, so the fast path incurs no
instrumentation overhead. Furthermore, fast path transactions can move to the
middle path instead of waiting or moving to the software path. We demonstrate
our approach by producing an accelerated version of the tree update template of
Brown et al., which can be used to implement fast lock-free data structures
based on down-trees. We used the accelerated template to implement two
lock-free trees: a binary search tree (BST), and an (a,b)-tree (a
generalization of a B-tree). Experiments show that, with 72 concurrent
processes, our accelerated (a,b)-tree performs between 4.0x and 4.2x as many
operations per second as an implementation obtained using the original tree
update template.
