  An important skill in critical thinking and argumentation is the ability to
spot and recognize fallacies. Fallacious arguments, omnipresent in
argumentative discourse, can be deceptive, manipulative, or simply leading to
`wrong moves' in a discussion. Despite their importance, argumentation scholars
and NLP researchers with focus on argumentation quality have not yet
investigated fallacies empirically. The nonexistence of resources dealing with
fallacious argumentation calls for scalable approaches to data acquisition and
annotation, for which the serious games methodology offers an appealing, yet
unexplored, alternative. We present Argotario, a serious game that deals with
fallacies in everyday argumentation. Argotario is a multilingual, open-source,
platform-independent application with strong educational aspects, accessible at
www.argotario.net.
