  The traditional concept of knowledge is a justified true belief. The bulk of
contemporary epistemology has focused primarily on that task of justification.
Truth seems to be a quite obvious criterion-does the belief in question
correspond to reality? My contention is that the aspect of ontology is far too
separated from epistemology. This onto-relationship between reality and beliefs
require the epistemic method of epistemological realism. This is not to
diminish the task of justification. I will then discuss the role of inference
from the onto-relationships of free invention and discovery and whether it is
best suited for a foundationalist or coherentist model within a theistic
context.
