  In multi-objective decision planning and learning, much attention is paid to
producing optimal solution sets that contain an optimal policy for every
possible user preference profile. We argue that the step that follows, i.e,
determining which policy to execute by maximising the user's intrinsic utility
function over this (possibly infinite) set, is under-studied. This paper aims
to fill this gap. We build on previous work on Gaussian processes and pairwise
comparisons for preference modelling, extend it to the multi-objective decision
support scenario, and propose new ordered preference elicitation strategies
based on ranking and clustering. Our main contribution is an in-depth
evaluation of these strategies using computer and human-based experiments. We
show that our proposed elicitation strategies outperform the currently used
pairwise methods, and found that users prefer ranking most. Our experiments
further show that utilising monotonicity information in GPs by using a linear
prior mean at the start and virtual comparisons to the nadir and ideal points,
increases performance. We demonstrate our decision support framework in a
real-world study on traffic regulation, conducted with the city of Amsterdam.
