  We compare and contrast fourteen measures that have been proposed for the
purpose of quantifying partisan gerrymandering. We consider measures that,
rather than examining the shapes of districts, utilize only the partisan vote
distribution among districts. The measures considered are two versions of
partisan bias; the efficiency gap and several of its variants; the mean-median
difference and the equal vote weight standard; the declination and one variant;
and the lopsided-means test. Our primary means of evaluating these measures is
a suite of hypothetical elections we classify from the start as fair or unfair.
We conclude that the declination is the most successful measure in terms of
avoiding false positives and false negatives on the elections considered. We
include in an appendix the most extreme outliers for each measure among
historical congressional and state legislative elections.
