  In [1, arXiv:1102.1844] the author disputes the conclusion of our paper [2,
arXiv:1006.0714]. He claims that the Feynman graphs of three dimensional group
field theory always represent pseudo manifolds. However, [1] uses a different
definition for pseudo manifolds. also, in order to apply the new definition,
[1] proposes a construction which cannot be implemented in a path integral by
Feynman rules. These two points invalidate the claims of [1].
