  Through a particular choice of a predicate (e.g., "x violated y"), a writer
can subtly connote a range of implied sentiments and presupposed facts about
the entities x and y: (1) writer's perspective: projecting x as an
"antagonist"and y as a "victim", (2) entities' perspective: y probably dislikes
x, (3) effect: something bad happened to y, (4) value: y is something valuable,
and (5) mental state: y is distressed by the event. We introduce connotation
frames as a representation formalism to organize these rich dimensions of
connotation using typed relations. First, we investigate the feasibility of
obtaining connotative labels through crowdsourcing experiments. We then present
models for predicting the connotation frames of verb predicates based on their
distributional word representations and the interplay between different types
of connotative relations. Empirical results confirm that connotation frames can
be induced from various data sources that reflect how people use language and
give rise to the connotative meanings. We conclude with analytical results that
show the potential use of connotation frames for analyzing subtle biases in
online news media.
