  It is widely accepted by physicists and philosophers of physics alike that
there are certain contexts in which general relativity will "break down". In
such cases, one expects to need some as-yet undiscovered successor theory. This
paper will discuss certain pathologies of general relativity that might be
taken to signal that the theory is breaking down, and consider how one might
expect a successor theory to do better. The upshot will be an unconventional
interpretation of the "Strong Cosmic Censorship Hypothesis".
