  Climate change and environmental concerns represent a global crisis
accompanied by significant economic challenges. Regular international
conferences held to address these issues, such as in the UK (2021) and Egypt
(2022), spark debate about the effectiveness and practicality of international
commitments. This study examines international treaties from a different
perspective, emphasizing the need to understand the power dynamics and
stakeholder interests that delay logical actions to mitigate anthropogenic
contributions to climate change and their impacts. Environmental and social
concerns tend to increase within nations as their economies develop, where they
fight to keep acceptable standards of living while reducing emissions volume.
So, nations play disproportionate roles in global decision-making based on the
size of their economies. Addressing climate change requires a paradigm shift to
emphasize acknowledging and adhering to global commitments through civil
pressure, rather than relying on traditional yet biased systems of
international political diplomacy. Here, climate-friendly actions are evaluated
and ideas to promote such activities are proposed. We introduce a "transition
regime" as a solution to this metastasis challenge which gradually infects all
nations.
