  The position paper highlights the range of concerns that are engulfed in the
injunction of explainable artificial intelligence in art (XAIxArt). Through a
series of quick sub-questions, it points towards the ambiguities concerning
'explanation' and the postpositivist tradition of 'relevant explanation'.
Rejecting both 'explanation' and 'relevant explanation', the paper takes a
stance that XAIxArt is a symptom of insecurity of the anthropocentric notion of
art and a nostalgic desire to return to outmoded notions of authorship and
human agency. To justify this stance, the paper makes a distinction between an
ornamentation model of explanation to a model of explanation as sense-making.
