  The search for an inhabited planet, other than our own, is a driver of
planetary exploration in our solar system and beyond. Using information from
our own planet to inform search strategies allows for a targeted search. It is,
however, worth considering some span in the strategy and in a priori
expectation. An inhabited Earth-like planet is one that would be similar to
Earth in ways that extend beyond having biota. To facilitate analysis, we
introduce a metric that extends from zero, for an inhabited planet that is like
Earth in all other regards (i.e., zero differences), toward positive or
negative values for planets that differ from Earth. The analysis shows how
assessment of life potential in our galaxy changes more significantly if we
find an inhabited planet that is less Earth-like (i.e., it quantifies how
probability assessments improve with deviations from Earth-likeness).
Discovering such planets could also provide a test of the strong form of the
Gaia hypothesis - a test that has proved difficult using only the Earth as a
laboratory. Lastly, we discuss how an Earth2.0 narrative, that has been
presented to the public as a search strategy, comes with nostalgia-laden
philosophical baggage that does not best serve exploration.
