  Classifying researchers according to the quality of their published work
rather than the quantity is a curtail issue. We attempt to introduce a new
formula of the percentage range to be used for evaluating qualitatively the
researchers' production. The suggested equation depends on the number of the
single-author published papers and their citations to be added as a new factor
to the known h-index. These factors give an advantage and make a clear evidence
of innovative authors and reduce the known h-index for authors who are gaining
citations by adding their names to multi-author papers. It is shown that
various dimensions of ethical integrity and originality will be effective in
this new index. An important scenario arising from the analysis is shown in
terms of examples. It refers to larger differences between the h- and the new
index which comes from the whole work and the one comes from the single-author
papers only, is shown.
