  The conventional dipole approximation (CDA) assumes that the EM fields a
small particle generates in the presence of its surrounding material bodies are
equal to the EM fields a point-like dipole generates in the absence of the
material bodies. The authors of [Phys. Rev. A 98, 013806 (2018)] investigate a
modified dipole approximation (MDA), which assumes that the EM fields the
particle generates are equal to the EM fields a point-like dipole generates in
the presence of the material bodies. The authors interpret the approximate EM
force under the MDA as the sum of four terms named 'generalized gradient
force', 'generalized radiation pressure', 'generalized spin curl force', and
'new force term'. I show that such an interpretation is wrong and misleading:
the generalized gradient force is not a gradient force; the generalized
radiation pressure is not a radiation pressure; and the generalized spin curl
force is not a spin curl force. In the case where the particle interacts with
only one resonant EM mode of small enough linewidth, which is usually called
'self-induced back-action trapping' in the literature, I rectify some of the
statements in their paper, and clear up some common misconceptions in the
literature. In the case where the particle does not interact with any EM modes
of small enough linewidth, I show that the numerical examples in their paper
are inconclusive, and more importantly, the MDA is in principle inaccurate when
the CDA is inaccurate. It should be noted that finding the approximate EM force
under the MDA is computationally as hard as finding the exact EM force.
