  Online social networks facilitate the diffusion of misinformation. Some
theorists construe the problem of misinformation as a problem of knowledge,
hence of ignorance. This assumption leads to solutions in which misinformation
(false belief) is resisted by good information (true belief). We argue that
information is better understood as gossip. We believe that gossip spreads as
part of an economy of social capital that has a specific discursive grammar
that mimics ordinary human gossip. But there are some critical differences.
These differences have immense and divisive social and political effects. If we
shift our focus from the truth or falsity of information, and instead focus on
the social dynamics of gossip we can more effectively respond to the challenges
and dangers of online social networks.
  Our argument has three parts. (1) We briefly critique epistemological and
truth-centered accounts of misinformation. (2) We describe a basic discursive
grammar of gossip as a social practice. (3) We, then, match the properties of
online information with this discursive grammar of gossip. While gossip has a
particular discursive form, its online modes involve a number of unique social
features that will have immense and divisive social and political effects. Our
goal is not to replace current accounts of information diffusion but to augment
these accounts with a descriptive model of gossip. Information diffusion models
should be understood as tools with which to explore the sociology of evolving
online communities in conjunction with offline communities.
