  Existing work on theorem proving for the assertion language of separation
logic (SL) either focuses on abstract semantics which are not readily available
in most applications of program verification, or on concrete models for which
completeness is not possible. An important element in concrete SL is the
points-to predicate which denotes a singleton heap. SL with the points-to
predicate has been shown to be non-recursively enumerable. In this paper, we
develop a first-order SL, called FOASL, with an abstracted version of the
points-to predicate. We prove that FOASL is sound and complete with respect to
an abstract semantics, of which the standard SL semantics is an instance. We
also show that some reasoning principles involving the points-to predicate can
be approximated as FOASL theories, thus allowing our logic to be used for
reasoning about concrete program verification problems. We give some example
theories that are sound with respect to different variants of separation logics
from the literature, including those that are incompatible with Reynolds's
semantics. In the experiment we demonstrate our FOASL based theorem prover
which is able to handle a large fragment of separation logic with heap
semantics as well as non-standard semantics.
