  The best-sampled afterglow light curves are available for GRB 030329. A
distinguishing feature of this event is the obvious rebrightening at around 1.6
days after the burst. Proposed explanations for the rebrightening mainly
include the two-component jet model and the refreshed shock model, although a
sudden density-jump in the circumburst environment is also a potential choice.
Here we re-examine the optical afterglow of GRB 030329 numerically in light of
the three models. In the density-jump model, no obvious rebrightening can be
produced at the jump moment. Additionally, after the density jump, the
predicted flux density decreases rapidly to a level that is significantly below
observations. A simple density-jump model thus can be excluded. In the
two-component jet model, although the observed late afterglow (after 1.6 days)
can potentially be explained as emission from the wide-component, the emergence
of this emission actually is too slow and it does not manifest as a
rebrightening as previously expected. The energy-injection model seems to be
the most preferred choice. By engaging a sequence of energy-injection events,
it provides an acceptable fit to the rebrightening at $\sim 1.6$ d, as well as
the whole observed light curve that extends to $\sim 80$ d. Further studies on
these multiple energy-injection processes may provide a valuable insight into
the nature of the central engines of gamma-ray bursts.
