  The theory of distributed computing, lagging in its development behind
practice, has been biased in its modelling by employing mechanisms within the
model mimicking reality. Reality means, processors can fail. But theory is
about predicting consequences of reality, hence if we capture reality by
"artificial models," but those nevertheless make analysis simpler, we should
pursue the artificial models.
  Recently the idea was advocated to analyze distributed systems and view
processors as infallible. It is the message delivery substrate that causes
problems. This view not only can effectively emulate reality, but above all
seems to allow to view any past models as \emph{synchronous} models.
Synchronous models are easier to analyze than asynchronous ones. Furthermore,
it gives rise to models we haven't contemplated in the past. One such model,
presented here, is the Hybrid Message-Adversary. We motivate this model through
the need to analyze Byzantine faults. The Hybrid model exhibits a phenomenon
not seen in the past.
