  Work in the paradigm of the quantum fluctuation theorems of Crooks and
Jarzynski is determined by projective measurements of energy at the beginning
and end of the force protocol. In analogy to classical systems, we consider an
alternative definition of work given by the integral of the supplied power
determined by integrating up the results of repeated measurements of the
instantaneous power during the force protocol. We observe that such a
definition of work, in spite of taking account of the process dependence, has
different possible values and statistics from the work determined by the
conventional two energy measurement approach (TEMA). In the limit of many
projective measurements of power, the system's dynamics is frozen in the power
measurement basis due to the quantum Zeno effect leading to statistics only
trivially dependent on the force protocol. In general the Jarzynski relation is
not satisfied except for the case when the instantaneous power operator
commutes with the total Hamiltonian at all times. We also consider properties
of the joint statistics of power-based definition of work and TEMA work in
protocols where both values are determined. This allows us to quantify their
correlations. Relaxing the projective measurement condition, weak continuous
measurements of power are considered within the stochastic master equation
formalism. Even in this scenario the power-based work statistics is in general
not able to reproduce qualitative features of the TEMA work statistics.
