  Whenever applicable, the Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) has shown itself
to be unreasonably effective. Instead of underperforming and getting trapped in
local minima due to the batch noise, SGD leverages it to learn to generalize
better and find minima that are good enough for the entire dataset. This led to
numerous theoretical and experimental investigations, especially in the context
of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), leading to better machine learning
algorithms. However, SGD is not applicable in a non-differentiable setting,
leaving all that prior research off the table.
  In this paper, we show that a class of evolutionary algorithms (EAs) inspired
by the Gillespie-Orr Mutational Landscapes model for natural evolution is
formally equivalent to SGD in certain settings and, in practice, is well
adapted to large ANNs. We refer to such EAs as Gillespie-Orr EA class (GO-EAs)
and empirically show how an insight transfer from SGD can work for them. We
then show that for ANNs trained to near-optimality or in the transfer learning
setting, the equivalence also allows transferring the insights from the
Mutational Landscapes model to SGD.
  We then leverage this equivalence to experimentally show how SGD and GO-EAs
can provide mutual insight through examples of minima flatness, transfer
learning, and mixing of individuals in EAs applied to large models.
