  Recently, requirements for the explainability of software systems have gained
prominence. One of the primary motivators for such requirements is that
explainability is expected to facilitate stakeholders' trust in a system.
Although this seems intuitively appealing, recent psychological studies
indicate that explanations do not necessarily facilitate trust. Thus,
explainability requirements might not be suitable for promoting trust.
  One way to accommodate this finding is, we suggest, to focus on
trustworthiness instead of trust. While these two may come apart, we ideally
want both: a trustworthy system and the stakeholder's trust. In this paper, we
argue that even though trustworthiness does not automatically lead to trust,
there are several reasons to engineer primarily for trustworthiness -- and that
a system's explainability can crucially contribute to its trustworthiness.
