  Maintaining literature databases and online bibliographies is a core
responsibility of metadata aggregators such as digital libraries. In the
process of monitoring all the available data sources the question arises which
data source should be prioritized. Based on a broad definition of information
quality we are looking for different ways to find the best fitting and most
promising conference candidates to harvest next. We evaluate different
conference ranking features by using a pseudo-relevance assessment and a
component-based evaluation of our approach.
