  We analyze the computational complexity of the many types of
pencil-and-paper-style puzzles featured in the 2016 puzzle video game The
Witness. In all puzzles, the goal is to draw a simple path in a rectangular
grid graph from a start vertex to a destination vertex. The different puzzle
types place different constraints on the path: preventing some edges from being
visited (broken edges); forcing some edges or vertices to be visited
(hexagons); forcing some cells to have certain numbers of incident path edges
(triangles); or forcing the regions formed by the path to be partially
monochromatic (squares), have exactly two special cells (stars), or be singly
covered by given shapes (polyominoes) and/or negatively counting shapes
(antipolyominoes). We show that any one of these clue types (except the first)
is enough to make path finding NP-complete ("witnesses exist but are hard to
find"), even for rectangular boards. Furthermore, we show that a final clue
type (antibody), which necessarily "cancels" the effect of another clue in the
same region, makes path finding $\Sigma_2$-complete ("witnesses do not exist"),
even with a single antibody (combined with many anti/polyominoes), and the
problem gets no harder with many antibodies. On the positive side, we give a
polynomial-time algorithm for monomino clues, by reducing to hexagon clues on
the boundary of the puzzle, even in the presence of broken edges, and solving
"subset Hamiltonian path" for terminals on the boundary of an embedded planar
graph in polynomial time.
