  We investigate two-party cryptographic protocols that are secure under
assumptions motivated by physics, namely relativistic assumptions
(no-signalling) and quantum mechanics. In particular, we discuss the security
of bit commitment in so-called split models, i.e. models in which at least some
of the parties are not allowed to communicate during certain phases of the
protocol. We find the minimal splits that are necessary to evade the
Mayers-Lo-Chau no-go argument and present protocols that achieve security in
these split models. Furthermore, we introduce the notion of local versus global
command, a subtle issue that arises when the split committer is required to
delegate non-communicating agents to open the commitment. We argue that
classical protocols are insecure under global command in the split model we
consider. On the other hand, we provide a rigorous security proof in the global
command model for Kent's quantum protocol [Kent 2011, Unconditionally Secure
Bit Commitment by Transmitting Measurement Outcomes]. The proof employs two
fundamental principles of modern physics, the no-signalling property of
relativity and the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics.
