  We analyze cosmography as a tool to constrain modified gravity theories. We
take four distinct models and obtain their parameters in terms of the
cosmographic parameters favored by observational data of strong gravitational
lensing. We contrast with the values obtained by direct comparison between each
model and the observational data. In general, we find consistency between the
two approaches at 2$\sigma$ for all models considered in this work. Our study
bridges the gap between theoretical predictions of modified gravity and
empirical observations of strong gravitational lensing, providing a simple
methodology to test the validity of these models.
