  The Kalam cosmological argument, which is logical-philosophical based on its
two premises, affirms that the universe had a cause. We carry out an analysis
from the perspective of current physics to contrast or object to the premises
of said argument. For this purpose, we will use the results found in
contemporary physics literature related to the premises of the Kalam argument.
Analyzing quantum theory and the latest experimental results that prove that
quantum phenomena are indeterministic and therefore not causal. And even in
deterministic theories, such as a space-time with negative curvature, causality
is in doubt. On the other hand, the first moments of the universe require
models that describe states before it to contrast experimental observations,
such as cosmic inflation theories. Thus, we will conclude that both premises of
the Kalam argument are not supported by contemporary physics.
