  Within the Ontological Models Framework (OMF), Pusey, Barrett, and Rudolph
(PBR) have given an argument by which they claimed that the epistemic view on
the wavefunction should be ruled out. This study highlights an incorrect
conclusion in PBR's arguments, which was made due to inadequacies in the
definitions of OMF. To be precise, OMF models the ontology of the preparation
procedure, but it does not model the ontology of the measurement device. Such
an asymmetric treatment becomes problematic, in scenarios in which measurement
devices have a quantum nature. Modifying the OMF's definition such that the
ontology of the measurement device becomes included, we will see how PBR's
result disappears.
