  Network interdiction problems are a natural way to study the sensitivity of a
network optimization problem with respect to the removal of a limited set of
edges or vertices. One of the oldest and best-studied interdiction problems is
minimum spanning tree (MST) interdiction. Here, an undirected multigraph with
nonnegative edge weights and positive interdiction costs on its edges is given,
together with a positive budget B. The goal is to find a subset of edges R,
whose total interdiction cost does not exceed B, such that removing R leads to
a graph where the weight of an MST is as large as possible. Frederickson and
Solis-Oba (SODA 1996) presented an O(log m)-approximation for MST interdiction,
where m is the number of edges. Since then, no further progress has been made
regarding approximations, and the question whether MST interdiction admits an
O(1)-approximation remained open.
  We answer this question in the affirmative, by presenting a 14-approximation
that overcomes two main hurdles that hindered further progress so far.
Moreover, based on a well-known 2-approximation for the metric traveling
salesman problem (TSP), we show that our O(1)-approximation for MST
interdiction implies an O(1)-approximation for a natural interdiction version
of metric TSP.
