  It is known that the model checking problem for the modal mu-calculus reduces
to the problem of solving a parity game and vice-versa. The latter is realised
by the Walukiewicz formulas which are satisfied by a node in a parity game iff
player 0 wins the game from this node. Thus, they define her winning region,
and any model checking algorithm for the modal mu-calculus, suitably
specialised to the Walukiewicz formulas, yields an algorithm for solving parity
games. In this paper we study the effect of employing the most straight-forward
mu-calculus model checking algorithm: fixpoint iteration. This is also one of
the few algorithms, if not the only one, that were not originally devised for
parity game solving already. While an empirical study quickly shows that this
does not yield an algorithm that works well in practice, it is interesting from
a theoretical point for two reasons: first, it is exponential on virtually all
families of games that were designed as lower bounds for very particular
algorithms suggesting that fixpoint iteration is connected to all those.
Second, fixpoint iteration does not compute positional winning strategies. Note
that the Walukiewicz formulas only define winning regions; some additional work
is needed in order to make this algorithm compute winning strategies. We show
that these are particular exponential-space strategies which we call
eventually-positional, and we show how positional ones can be extracted from
them.
