  Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) is one of the driving applications
of vehicular ad-hoc networks (VANETs) and promises to bring more efficient and
faster transportation through cooperative behavior between vehicles. In CACC,
vehicles exchange information, which is relied on to partially automate
driving; however, this reliance on cooperation requires resilience against
attacks and other forms of misbehavior. In this paper, we propose a rigorous
attacker model and an evaluation framework for this resilience by quantifying
the attack impact, providing the necessary tools to compare controller
resilience and attack effectiveness simultaneously. Although there are
significant differences between the resilience of the three analyzed
controllers, we show that each can be attacked effectively and easily through
either jamming or data injection. Our results suggest a combination of
misbehavior detection and resilient control algorithms with graceful
degradation are necessary ingredients for secure and safe platoons.
