  We show that a recently developed semiclassical expansion for the eigenvalues
of PT-symmetric oscillators of the form $V(x)=(ix)^{2N+1}+bix$ does not agree
with an earlier WKB expression for $V(x)=-(ix)^{2N+1}$ the case $b=0$. The
reason is due to the choice of different paths in the complex plane for the
calculation of the WKB integrals. We compare the Stokes and anti-Stokes lines
that apply to each case for the quintic oscillator and derive a general WKB
expression that contains the two earlier ones.
