  This work investigates the empirical performance of the sparse synthesis
versus sparse analysis regularization for the ill-posed inverse problem of
audio declipping. We develop a versatile non-convex heuristics which can be
readily used with both data models. Based on this algorithm, we report that, in
most cases, the two models perform almost similarly in terms of signal
enhancement. However, the analysis version is shown to be amenable for real
time audio processing, when certain analysis operators are considered. Both
versions outperform state-of-the-art methods in the field, especially for the
severely saturated signals.
