  The recent advancement of large language models (LLMs) has been achieved
through a combo of instruction tuning and human alignment. However, building
manually crafted instruction datasets and performing human alignment become the
bottleneck for scaling the development of LLMs. In this paper, we exploit the
idea of leveraging AI models in lieu of humans as the teacher to train student
LLMs. Our method is inspired by how human students refine their writing skills
by following the rubrics and learning from the revisions offered by their
tutors. Specifically, we employ a teacher LLM to create a curriculum for
instruction tuning of the student LLM, namely Curriculum Instruction TunING
(CITING). It encompasses two main steps: (1) the teacher LLM crafts the rubrics
for evaluating the answers corresponding to various types of questions, and (2)
the student LLM learns to follow the rubrics and perform self-correction from
the revision made by the teacher. We further iteratively carry out it to embody
the procedure of CITING. We compare CITING to a series of state-of-the-art
baselines on four datasets. Our method demonstrates strong improvement in terms
of articulate, in-depth, and comprehensive by GPT-4 evaluation. Specifically,
it achieves an average winning rate of 79.4% over SFT, 73.4% over RLHF, 78.1%
over RRHF, and 76.3% over RAFT, respectively.
