  In recent years, there has been tremendous progress in automated synthesis
techniques that are able to automatically generate code based on some intent
expressed by the programmer. A major challenge for the adoption of synthesis
remains in having the programmer communicate their intent. When the expressed
intent is coarse-grained (for example, restriction on the expected type of an
expression), the synthesizer often produces a long list of results for the
programmer to choose from, shifting the heavy-lifting to the user. An
alternative approach, successfully used in end-user synthesis is programming by
example (PBE), where the user leverages examples to interactively and
iteratively refine the intent. However, using only examples is not expressive
enough for programmers, who can observe the generated program and refine the
intent by directly relating to parts of the generated program.
  We present a novel approach to interacting with a synthesizer using a
granular interaction model. Our approach employs a rich interaction model where
(i) the synthesizer decorates a candidate program with debug information that
assists in understanding the program and identifying good or bad parts, and
(ii) the user is allowed to provide feedback not only on the expected output of
a program, but also on the underlying program itself. That is, when the user
identifies a program as (partially) correct or incorrect, they can also
explicitly indicate the good or bad parts, to allow the synthesizer to accept
or discard parts of the program instead of discarding the program as a whole.
  We show the value of our approach in a controlled user study. Our study shows
that participants have strong preference to using granular feedback instead of
examples, and are able to provide granular feedback much faster.
