  In a recent paper, Leka at al. (Solar Phys. 260, 83, 2009)constructed a
synthetic vector magnetogram representing a three-dimensional magnetic
structure defined only within a fraction of an arcsec in height. They rebinned
the magnetogram to simulate conditions of limited spatial resolution and then
compared the results of various azimuth disambiguation methods on the resampled
data. Methods relying on the physical calculation of potential and/or
non-potential magnetic fields failed in nearly the same, extended parts of the
field of view and Leka et al. (2009) attributed these failures to the limited
spatial resolution. This study shows that the failure of these methods is not
due to the limited spatial resolution but due to the narrowly defined test
data. Such narrow magnetic structures are not realistic in the real Sun.
Physics-based disambiguation methods, adapted for solar magnetic fields
extending to infinity, are not designed to handle such data; hence, they could
only fail this test. I demonstrate how an appropriate limited-resolution
disambiguation test can be performed by constructing a synthetic vector
magnetogram very similar to that of Leka et al. (2009) but representing a
structure defined in the semi-infinite space above the solar photosphere. For
this magnetogram I find that even a simple potential-field disambiguation
method manages to resolve the ambiguity very successfully, regardless of
limited spatial resolution. Therefore, despite the conclusions of Leka et al.
(2009), a proper limited-spatial-resolution test of azimuth disambiguation
methods is yet to be performed in order to identify the best ideas and
algorithms.
