  We study the MaxRes rule in the context of certifying unsatisfiability. We
show that it can be exponentially more powerful than tree-like resolution, and
when augmented with weakening (the system MaxResW), p-simulates tree-like
resolution. In devising a lower bound technique specific to MaxRes (and not
merely inheriting lower bounds from Res), we define a new proof system called
the SubCubeSums proof system. This system, which p-simulates MaxResW, can be
viewed as a special case of the semialgebraic Sherali-Adams proof system. In
expressivity, it is the integral restriction of conical juntas studied in the
contexts of communication complexity and extension complexity. We show that it
is not simulated by Res. Using a proof technique qualitatively different from
the lower bounds that MaxResW inherits from Res, we show that Tseitin
contradictions on expander graphs are hard to refute in SubCubeSums. We also
establish a lower bound technique via lifting: for formulas requiring large
degree in SubCubeSums, their XOR-ification requires large size in SubCubeSums.
