  The rapid development in the field of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to
a surge in applications that facilitate collaboration among multiple agents to
assist humans in their daily tasks. However, a significant gap remains in
assessing whether LLM-powered applications genuinely enhance user experience
and task execution efficiency. This highlights the pressing need for methods to
verify utility of LLM-powered applications, particularly by ensuring alignment
between the application's functionality and end-user needs. We introduce
AgentEval provides an implementation for the math problems, a novel framework
designed to simplify the utility verification process by automatically
proposing a set of criteria tailored to the unique purpose of any given
application. This allows for a comprehensive assessment, quantifying the
utility of an application against the suggested criteria. We present a
comprehensive analysis of the robustness of quantifier's work.
