  Many Bell test results violate Bell's inequality. The premise of Bell's
inequality is local determinism. We propose that, it can't be proved that
something's mechanism isn't deterministic; if loopholes are not the reason of
violation of Bell's inequality, violation of Bell's inequality illustrates that
the mechanism isn't local. We propose a new explanation of Bell test, and the
explanation illustrates the locality loophole is not closed by Weihs'
experiment.
