Having Difficulty Explaining 9/11 To Friends?, Here are 5 points to consider...
Sep 30 2007, 05:13 PM
Group: Valued Member
Joined: 20-October 06
Member No.: 117
1. Did the Towers Collapse Too Quickly?
The official story is that the collapse began when one floor broke, and the pieces fell to the floor below it. Those pieces shattered that floor, and so on, all the way down. However, when the pieces hit the floor below it, they would have slowed down slightly because some of their energy would be used to break the floor. Therefore, there should be a delay every time the pieces hit a floor. The towers had 110 floors, so if it took one second for each floor to be crushed, that would be 110 seconds.
However, the seismic data and video show that the North Tower collapsed in only 8.4 seconds. The collapse started at about the 94th floor. If you were to drop a rock from the 94th floor, it would hit the ground about 8.4 seconds later. This means that the pieces of the building were falling as fast as objects fall through the air. How can objects crash through steel and concrete floors as fast as they fall through the air?
There is only one explanation. Explosives were placed in these buildings before the attack. The collapse of the North Tower started when explosives at the 94th floor were detonated. The explosives were timed so that the floors were shattered before the rubble contacted it. The pieces of the building fell in only 8.4 seconds because none of the pieces crashed into a floor.
2. Why Has Fire Never Destroyed a Skyscraper Before?
A fire in a 32-story skyscraper in Madrid, Spain, became so intense that it spread from one floor to the next, causing the building to look like a torch. This fire was much larger than the fire at the World Trade Center. The next morning there were still a few fires in the lower floors. Everything inside the building had been burned. Some sections of the building broke. A few portions at the top of the building collapsed. However, the building remained standing, and it continued to support a large construction crane at the top. By comparison, the fire at the South Tower was so small that it never spread to the other side of the tower.
3. Why Does the Government Use the Same Engineer?
The government selected an engineer named Gene Corley to investigate the collapse of the World Trade Center towers and Building 7. Corley had also been selected to investigate the bombing of the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City in 1995, as well as the fire at the Branch Davidian complex in Waco, Texas, in 1993.
In all three cases, Corley supported the government's theory. However, for those of us who have seen the evidence that the government was involved in those three crimes, we have to conclude that Corley was selected to investigate these crimes because he is one of the few people with engineering credentials who is willing to lie for the government.
A lot of people are willing to secretly commit or cover up a crime, but not many people want to publicly defend a crime. This seems especially true for people who have struggled for years to build up a reputation as a competent scientist or engineer. Therefore, when the government finds an engineer or scientist willing to lie for them, they have to turn to that person again and again.
A few university professors supported the government's theory about the collapse of the towers, but they ignored the collapse of Building 7, and they have not yet responded to critics of their theory. It appears as if they published these theories only because they were pressured to do so, and then they quickly went into hiding.
4. What Happened to Building 7?
The collapse of Building 7 is the most obvious sign that the government was involved in the attack. This was a 47-story building with a steel frame. It was not hit by an airplane, and it was across the street from the towers. At 5:25 PM, this building collapsed into a tiny pile of rubble. Video and photos show that Building 7 collapsed exactly like old buildings that are brought down by explosives.
The U.S. Government investigated the collapse of this building, but after seven months of investigating, their conclusion was that they have no idea why the building collapsed. A few months later, the landlord of Building 7, Larry Silverstein, announced on television that the fire department demolished Building 7.
If the government was interested in understanding what happened on September 11, they would have asked Silverstein and the fire department to explain what happened to Building 7, but our government officials, university professors, and news reporters are ignoring Building 7. For the government to ignore such a major crime is simply more evidence that they were involved in this attack.
5. What Else Was the Government Involved With?
The government could have arranged for the airplanes to hit the towers at night, and the buildings could have been demolished at night, when nobody was looking. How could they have the confidence to blow up buildings during daylight, and with people around the world watching on television? The only explanation is that these people had committed major crimes before, and in front of everybody's faces.
The Oklahoma City bombing, for example, was very similar. Explosives were placed in the building before the attack, and a couple hundred people were blown up while they were inside the building. The assassination of President Kennedy was also performed in front of everybody, but after 40 years our school textbooks continue to teach children that Oswald killed Kennedy all by himself.
The people who committed these crimes got away with them, which certainly gave them the confidence to do other crimes. When people ignore crime, morale in the nation is reduced, and the criminals are encouraged to act again.
Sep 30 2007, 07:18 PM
Group: Active Forum Pilot
Joined: 23-December 06
Member No.: 360
Do you find it strange that.
The attitude of law enforcement officers includes tazering people, breaking the arms of high school children and arresting seventy year olds for not watering their lawns.
Does your cell/wireless home phone have this really strange echo effect on it sometimes?
A career has a lifespan of two years in the country while you, yourself might live to be eighty?
Are you confused by the four pages of disclaimers in number two font attached to the medication your doctor wants you to take?
Have you seen in your lifetime the actual color of the sky turn to yellow during a sunset?
You are making more money yet doesn't it buy much less than your parents?
Even making more isn't your lifesytle worse.
Sep 30 2007, 09:36 PM
Group: Private Forum Pilot
Joined: 22-October 06
Member No.: 126
The towers had 110 floors, so if it took one second for each floor to be crushed, that would be 110 seconds.
I always thought this explanation would be wrong.
When the upper floor crash the next floor, it gains weight.
then drop to the next floor.
So I know even this is wrong but 110 seconds explanation is technically wrong.
When I explain about drop, I simply tell them.
"Do you know how long it would take to drop from 417m high? It would take 9.2 seconds in vacuum. You would think it would take longer with air resistance. You would think very long time to drop with concrete and steel resistance. Do you think an object would drop within around 10 seconds with concrete resistance?”
Of course, I change the method depend on his/her education level.
I often ask them if they know what jet fuel is.
I ask them if they have seen kerosene stove collapsed before.
Anyway the best way is just give away a DVD I made. They are not going to believe you whatever you say.
|Lo-Fi Version||Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 11:34 AM|