---
abstract: 'The noncentrosymmetric superconductor Re$_{24}$Ti$_{5}$, a time-reversal symmetry (TRS) breaking candidate with $T_c = 6$K, was studied by means of muon-spin rotation/relaxation ($\mu$SR) and tunnel-diode oscillator (TDO) techniques. At a macroscopic level, its bulk superconductivity was investigated via electrical resistivity, magnetic susceptibility, and heat capacity measurements. The low-temperature penetration depth, superfluid density and electronic heat capacity all evidence an $s$-wave coupling with an enhanced superconducting gap. The spontaneous magnetic fields revealed by zero-field $\mu$SR below $T_c$ indicate a time-reversal symmetry breaking and thus the unconventional nature of superconductivity in Re$_{24}$Ti$_{5}$. The concomitant occurrence of TRS breaking also in the isostructural Re$_6$(Zr,Hf) compounds, hints at its common origin in this superconducting family and that an enhanced spin-orbital coupling does not affect pairing symmetry.'
author:
- 'T. Shang'
- 'G. M. Pang'
- 'C. Baines'
- 'W. B. Jiang'
- 'W. Xie'
- 'A. Wang'
- 'M. Medarde'
- 'E. Pomjakushina'
- 'M. Shi'
- 'J. Mesot'
- 'H. Q. Yuan'
- 'T. Shiroka'
bibliography:
- 'Re24Ti5\_biblio.bib'
title: 'Nodeless superconductivity and time-reversal symmetry breaking in the noncentrosymmetric superconductor Re$_{24}$Ti$_{5}$'
---

Superconductors with an inversion center can host either even-parity spin-singlet or odd-parity spin-triplet states. These strict symmetry-imposed requirements, however, are relaxed in noncentrosymmetric superconductors (NCSCs), where parity-mixed superconducting states are also allowed. In these materials the lack of an inversion symmetry often induces an antisymmetric spin-orbit coupling (ASOC), which can lift the degeneracy of conduction band electrons. Since the extent of parity-mixing is determined by the strength of SOC, formally similar compounds, but with different spin-orbit couplings, can exhibit different degrees of parity mixing.

The recent interest in NCSCs is related to the complex nature of their superconducting properties.[@Bauer2012; @smidman2017] Because of the mixed pairing, noncentrosymmetric superconductors can display significantly different properties compared to their conventional counterparts. Some NCSCs, such as CePt$_3$Si,[@bonalde2005CePt3Si],CeIrSi$_3$,[@mukuda2008CeIrSi3], Li$_2$Pt$_3$B,[@yuan2006; @nishiyama2007] and Mo$_3$Al$_2$C,[@bauer2010] exhibit line nodes, while others, as LaNiC$_2$,[@chen2013] and (La,Y)$_2$C$_3$,[@kuroiwa2008] show multiple superconducting gaps. Furthermore, because of the spin-triplet pairing, the upper critical field often exceeds the Pauli limit, as has been found, e.g., in CePt$_3$Si,[@bauer2004] and Ce(Rh,Ir)Si$_3$.[@kimura2007; @sugitani2006] Finally, some NCSCs, as e.g., LaNiC$_2$,[@Hillier2009], Re$_6$(Zr,Hf)[@Singh2014; @Singh2017] and La$_7$Ir$_3$,[@Barker2015] are known to break the time-reversal symmetry (TRS).

The binary alloy Re$_{24}$Ti$_{5}$ is a NCSC with superconducting temperature $T_c = 6$K, as reported already in the 1960s’.[@Matthias1961] Its physical properties were studied in detail only recently,[@Lue2013ReTi] yet to date the microscopic nature of its SC remains largely unexplored. Similarly to Re$_{24}$Zr$_{5}$ and Re$_{24}$Nb$_{5}$, also Re$_{24}$Ti$_{5}$ adopts an $\alpha$-Mn type crystal structure with space group $I$-43$m$. However, while the former compounds have been widely studied by means of macro- and microscopic techniques,[@Lue2011; @Matano2016] much less is known about Re$_{24}$Ti$_{5}$. A simple analogy, based on structural similarity, can lead to wrong conclusions, since a SOC-dependent parity mixing can bring about rather different superconducting properties. Since its sister compounds, Re$_6$(Zr,Hf), are known to break the TRS in the superconducting state,[@Singh2014; @Singh2017] Re$_{24}$Ti$_{5}$ represents an ideal opportunity to search for TRS breaking and unconventional SC in a material with a modified SOC value. Moreover, the study of an additional NCSCs can bring new insights into the nature of unconventional superconductivity in general.

Considering the key role played by muon-spin relaxation and rotation ($\mu$SR) techniques in unraveling the presence of TRS breaking in unconventional superconductors,[@Luke1998] in this paper, we report on the systematic magnetization, transport, thermodynamic, tunnel-diode oscillator (TDO) and $\mu$SR studies of Re$_{24}$Ti$_{5}$, with particular focus on the latter. We find that below $T_c$ spontaneous magnetic fields appear, implying a superconducting state which breaks TRS and has an unconventional nature. The low-temperature penetration depth, superfluid density and electronic specific heat all suggest a nodeless $s$-wave pairing mechanism. Polycrystalline Re$_{24}$Ti$_{5}$ samples were prepared by arc melting Re and Ti metals under argon atmosphere and then annealed at 900$^\circ$C for two weeks. The x-ray powder diffraction, measured on a Bruker D8 diffractometer, confirmed the $\alpha$-Mn structure of Re$_{24}$Ti$_{5}$. Magnetic susceptibility, electrical resistivity, and specific heat measurements in different applied magnetic fields were performed on a Quantum Design magnetic property measurement system (MPMS-7T) and a physical property measurement system (PPMS-14T). The $\mu$SR measurements were carried out using the general-purpose (GPS) instrument located at the $\pi$M3 beamline of the Swiss Muon Source (S$\mu$S) of Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI) in Villigen, Switzerland. The temperature-dependent shift of magnetic-penetration depth was measured by using a tunnel-diode oscillator (TDO) technique in a He$^3$ cryostat, at an operating frequency of 7MHz. The magnetic susceptibility, measured at 1mT using field-cooling (FC) and zero-field cooling (ZFC) procedures, is shown in Fig. \[fig:superconductivity\](a). The splitting of the two curves is typical of type-II superconductors, and the ZFC-susceptibility indicates bulk superconductivity with $T_c$ = 6K. The electrical resistivity drops at the onset of superconductivity at 6.8K, becoming zero at 6K \[see Fig. \[fig:Hc2\_determ\](a)\]. The bulk nature of SC is further confirmed by specific-heat data \[see Fig. \[fig:Hc2\_determ\](b)\].

![\[fig:superconductivity\] (a) Temperature dependence of magnetic susceptibility $\chi(T)$ for Re$_{24}$Ti$_{5}$. (b) Magnetization versus applied magnetic field recorded at different temperatures up to $T_c$. For each temperature, $\mu_{0}H_{c1}$ was determined as the value where $M(H)$ deviates from linearity. (c) $\mu_{0}H_{c1}$ vs. temperature: the solid line, a fit to $\mu_{0}H_{c1}(T) =\mu_{0}H_{c1}(0)[1-(T/T_{c})^2]$, determines a $\mu_{0} H_{c1}(0) = 8.3(1)$mT.](Fig1){width="48.00000%"}

In transverse field (TF) $\mu$SR measurements of superconductors, the applied magnetic field should exceed the lower $\mu_{0}H_{c1}$ critical value, so that the additional field-distribution broadening due to the flux-line lattice (FFL) can be quantified from the muon decay rate. To determine $\mu_{0}H_{c1}$, the field-dependent magnetization was preliminarily measured at various temperatures below $T_c$, as shown in Fig. \[fig:superconductivity\](b). The derived $\mu_{0}H_{c1}$ values are plotted in Fig. \[fig:superconductivity\](c) as a function of temperature. The solid line is a fit to $\mu_{0}H_{c1}(T) = \mu_{0}H_{c1}(0)[1-(T/T_{c})^2]$, which provides a lower critical field $\mu_{0} H_{c1}(0) = 8.3(1)$mT, consistent with the 8.4-mT value calculated from magnetic penetration depth $\lambda(0)$. In the Ginzburg-Landau theory of superconductivity, the magnetic penetration depth $\lambda$ is related to the coherence length $\xi$ and the lower critical field $\mu_{0}H_{c1}$ via $\mu_{0}H_{c1} = (\Phi_0 /4 \pi \lambda^2)[$ln$(\kappa)+\alpha(\kappa)]$, where $\Phi_0 = 2.07 \times 10^{-3}$T$\mu$m$^{2}$ is the quantum of magnetic flux, $\kappa$ = $\lambda$/$\xi$ is the Ginzburg-Landau parameter, and $\alpha(\kappa)$ is a parameter which converges to 0.497 for $\kappa$ $\gg$ 1. By using $\mu_{0}H_{c1} = 8.3$mT and $\xi = 5.41$nm (calculated from $\mu_{0}H_{c2}$), the resulting $\lambda(0) = 286$nm is consistent with the experimental value from $\mu$SR \[see Fig. \[fig:TF\_MuSR\](c)\]. With a Ginzburg-Landau parameter $\kappa \sim 53 \gg 1$, Re$_{24}$Ti$_{5}$ is clearly a type-II superconductor. The temperature dependence of penetration depth $\lambda(T)$ can be estimated also from $\mu_{0}H_{c1}(T)$ and $\xi(T)$, where $\xi(T)$ is related to the upper critical field, $\mu_{0} H_{c2}(T)$ = $\Phi_0$/2$\pi$$\xi^2(T)$.

![\[fig:Hc2\_determ\] Temperature-dependent electrical resistivity (a) and specific heat (b) at different applied magnetic fields up to 12 T. From the suppression of $T_{c}$ with increasing field (c) we determine an upper critical field $\mu_{0}H_{c2}(0) = 11.2(1)$T. The dashed line represents a fit to the WHH model without spin-orbit scattering, whereas the dash-dotted line is a fit to the Ginzburg-Landau model (see text). ](Fig2){width="52.00000%"}

To investigate the behavior of the upper critical field $\mu_0$$H_{c2}$, we measured the electrical resistivity $\rho(T)$ and specific heat $C(T)$/$T$ at various magnetic fields. As shown in Figs. \[fig:Hc2\_determ\](a) and (b), the superconducting transition in both cases shifts towards lower temperature upon increasing the magnetic field. Note that, for $\mu_{0}H$ = 11T, the large upturn of specific heat at low-$T$ is due to a Schottky anomaly from nuclear moments, which hides the superconducting transition. Similar features were also observed in other Re-based intermetallic superconductors.[@chen2016ReHf; @chen2013ReNb] The superconducting transition temperatures vs. the normalized temperature $T/T_{c}$, as derived from both $\rho(T)$ and $C(T)$/$T$ are summarized in Fig. \[fig:Hc2\_determ\](c). Data taken from Ref.  are also plotted. The temperature dependence of the upper critical field $\mu_0$$H_{c2}(T)$ was analyzed following the Werthamer-Helfand-Hohenberg (WHH) model.[@Werthamer1966] The dashed-line in Fig. \[fig:Hc2\_determ\](c), a fit to the WHH model without considering spin-orbital scattering, gives $\mu_0 H_{c2}^\mathrm{WHH}(0) = \- 11.2(1)$T. The derived $\mu_0$$H_{c2}(0)$ value is very close to the Pauli paramagnetic limit for the weak-coupling case, $\mu_0 H_\mathrm{P} = 1.86\,T_{c} = 11.7(2)$T, thus indicating the possibility of a singlet-triplet mixing state. For completeness, we estimated the upper critical field also by means of the Ginzburg-Landau model $\mu_0 H_{c2}(T) = \mu_0 H_{c2}(0)(1-t^2)/(1+t^2)$, where $t = T/T_{c}$ is again the normalized temperature. As shown in Fig. \[fig:Hc2\_determ\](c) by a dash-dotted line, at low fields the fit is quite good. However, at higher applied fields, the fit deviates significantly from data, providing an overestimated critical field value $\mu_0 H_{c2}^\mathrm{GL}(0) = 13.6(2)$T. The remarkable agreement of the more elaborate WHH model with experimental data is clearly seen in Fig. \[fig:Hc2\_determ\](c). To investigate the superconducting properties of Re$_{24}$Ti$_{5}$ at a microscopic level, we carried out TF-$\mu$SR measurements in an applied field of 20mT. The optimal field value for such experiments was determined via a preliminary field-dependent $\mu$SR depolarization-rate measurement at 1.5K. To avoid flux-pinning issues, the magnetic field (up to 750mT) was applied in the normal state and then the sample was cooled down to 1.5K. As shown in Fig. \[fig:TF\_MuSR\](a), the resulting Gaussian relaxation rate $\sigma_\mathrm{sc}$ versus applied magnetic field exhibits a maximum near the lower critical field \[see Fig. \[fig:superconductivity\](c)\]. By considering the decrease of intervortex distance with field and vortex-core effects, a field of 20mT(shown with an arrow), almost twice the $\mu_{0} H_{c1}(0)$ value, was chosen for the temperature-dependent study.

![\[fig:TF\_MuSR\] (a) Field-dependent $\mu$SR relaxation rate at $T = 1.5$K. The arrow indicates the field used for the TF-$\mu$SR studies of the superconducting phase. (b) Time-domain TF-$\mu$SR spectra above and below $T_{c}$ show different relaxation rates. (c) Superfluid density vs. temperature, as determined from $\mu$SR (triangles), $H_{c1}$ (diamonds) and TDO (squares) data. The insert shows the shift of penetration depth below 3K and the dash-dotted line indicates the exponential temperature dependence. (d) Zero-field electronic specific heat vs. temperature. Inset: Raw $C/T$ data vs. $T^{2}$. The dashed-line is a fit to $C/T = \gamma_{\mathrm{n}} + \beta T^{2} + \delta T^{4}$, from which the phonon contribution was evaluated. The solid lines in (c) and (d) both represent fits using a fully-gapped $s$-wave model.](Fig3){width="40.00000%"}

Figure \[fig:TF\_MuSR\](b) shows two representative TF-$\mu$SR spectra collected above and below $T_{c}$. Below $T_{c}$, the fast decay of muon-spin polarization reflects the inhomogeneous field distribution due to the FFL in the mixed superconducting state. The time-domain spectra were fitted by means of the following model with a Gaussian decay: $$A_\mathrm{TF} = A_\mathrm{s} \cos(\gamma_{\mu} B_\mathrm{s} t + \phi) e^{- \sigma^2 t^2/2} +
A_\mathrm{bg} \cos(\gamma_{\mu} B_\mathrm{bg} t + \phi).$$ Here $A_\mathrm{s}$ and $A_\mathrm{bg}$ are the initial muon-spin asymmetries for muons implanted in the sample and sample holder, respectively, with the latter not undergoing any depolarization. $\gamma_{\mu} = 2\pi \times 135.53$MHz/T is the muon gyromagnetic ratio, $B_\mathrm{s}$ and $B_\mathrm{bg}$ are the local fields sensed by implanted muons in the sample and sample holder, $\phi$ is the (common) initial precession phase, and $\sigma$ is a Gaussian-relaxation rate. Given the nonmagnetic nature of the sample holder, $B_\mathrm{bg}$ practically coincides with the applied magnetic field and was used as an intrinsic reference.

In the superconducting state, the Gaussian relaxation rate includes contributions from both the FLL ($\sigma_\mathrm{sc}$) and the nuclear magnetic moments ($\sigma_\mathrm{n}$). Since $\sigma_\mathrm{n}$ is expected to be temperature independent in the considered temperature range, the FLL-related relaxation rate can be derived by subtracting the nuclear contribution from the measured Gaussian relaxation, i.e., $\sigma_\mathrm{sc}$ = $\sqrt{\sigma^{2} - \sigma^{2}_\mathrm{n}}$. Since $\sigma_\mathrm{sc}$ is directly related to the superfluid density ($\sigma_\mathrm{sc}$ $\propto$ $1/\lambda^2$), the superconducting gap value and its symmetry can be determined from the temperature-dependent relaxation rate $\sigma_\mathrm{sc}(T)$. For small applied magnetic fields \[in comparison with the upper critical field, i.e., $H_\mathrm{appl}$/$H_{c2}$ $\ll$1\], the effective penetration depth $\lambda_\mathrm{eff}$ can be calculated from:[@Barford1988; @Brandt2003] $$\frac{\sigma_\mathrm{sc}^2(T)}{\gamma^2_{\mu}} = 0.00371\, \frac{\Phi_0^2}{\lambda^4_{\mathrm{eff}}(T)}.$$ In a polycrystalline sample, the effective penetration depth $\lambda_\mathrm{eff}$ is usually determined by the shortest penetration depth $\lambda_{ab}$, the two being related via $\lambda_\mathrm{eff} = 3^{1/4} \lambda_{ab}$.[@Fesenko1991] Figure \[fig:TF\_MuSR\](c) shows the normalized superfluid density ($\rho_{\mathrm{sc}} \propto \lambda_{ab}^{-2}$) as a function of temperature for Re$_{24}$Ti$_{5}$. The $\lambda_{ab}^{-2}$ data calculated from $\mu_{0} H_{c1}$ and those from TDO measurements are also plotted, both clearly consistent with the $\mu$SR results. The temperature-dependent behavior of $\lambda_{ab}^{-2}$ is well described by an $s$-wave model with a single SC gap of about 1.08meV and a $\lambda(0)$ of 298nm. Such superconducting gap is similar to that of other Re-based intermetallic superconductors, e.g., Re$_6$Zr (1.21 meV),[@Singh2014; @mayoh2017ReZr] Re$_6$Hf (0.94 meV),[@singh2016ReHf; @chen2016ReHf] Re$_{24}$Nb$_5$ (0.89 meV).[@Lue2011] Also the $2\Delta/\mathrm{k}_\mathrm{B}T_{c}$ values of these compounds \[e.g., 4.2(1) for Re$_{24}$Ti$_{5}$\] are higher than 3.53, the value expected for a weakly-coupled BCS superconductor, thus indicating moderately strong electron-phonon couplings in these materials. Moreover, the low temperature penetration depth shown in the inset of Fig. \[fig:TF\_MuSR\](c), exhibits an exponential temperature dependence, providing further evidence of fully-gapped superconductivity in Re$_{24}$Ti$_5$. Since the specific heat in the superconducting state also offers insights into the superconducting gap and its symmetry, the zero-field specific heat data were further analyzed. The electronic specific heat ($C_\mathrm{e}$/$T$) is obtained by subtracting the phonon contribution from the experimental data. As shown in the inset of Fig. \[fig:TF\_MuSR\](d) by a dashed-line, the normal-state specific heat is fitted with $C/T = \gamma_\mathrm{n} +\beta T^2 + \delta T^4$. The derived $C_\mathrm{e}/T$ is then divided by the normal-state electronic specific heat coefficient, as shown in the main panel as a function of temperature. The solid line in Fig. \[fig:TF\_MuSR\](d) represents a fit with $\gamma_\mathrm{n}$ = 26.4(2)mJmol$^{-1}$K$^{-2}$ and a single isotropic gap $\Delta(0)= 1.9(1)\,k_\mathrm{B}T_c$. It reproduces very well the experimental data, while being consistent with the TF-$\mu$SR and TDO results \[see Fig. \[fig:TF\_MuSR\](c)\]. The ratio $\Delta C/\gamma$$T_{c}$ was found to be 1.4, consistent with previous data[@Lue2013ReTi] and in good agreement with the BCS-theory value of 1.43. To address the key question of the occurrence of time-reversal symmetry breaking in Re$_{24}$Ti$_{5}$, we made use of zero-field (ZF)-$\mu$SR. The large muon gyromagnetic ratio, combined with the availability of 100% spin-polarized muon beams, make ZF-$\mu$SR a very powerful technique to detect the spontaneous fields, as shown by its successful use in previous studies of Re$_{6}$(Zr,Hf),[@Singh2014; @Singh2017] La$_7$Ir$_3$,[@Barker2015], Sr$_{2}$RuO$_{4}$,[@Luke1998], and PrOs$_4$Sb$_{12}$.[@aoki2003] Normally, in absence of external fields, the onset of superconducting phase does not imply changes in the ZF muon-spin relaxation rate. However, in case of TRS breaking, the onset of tiny spontaneous currents gives rise to associated (weak) magnetic fields, promptly detected by ZF-$\mu$SR as an increase in muon-spin relaxation rate. Given the tiny size of such effects, we measured carefully the muon-spin relaxation rate both well above $T_c$ and well inside the superconducting phase. As shown in Fig. \[fig:ZF\_muSR\](a), two representative ZF-$\mu$SR spectra collected above (8K) and below (1.5K) $T_c$ show clear differences, especially at long times. To exclude the possibility of stray magnetic fields (which in any case would affect uniformly all datasets),

![\[fig:ZF\_muSR\](a) Representative zero-field $\mu$SR spectra for Re$_{24}$Ti$_{5}$ at 1.5 and 8K and relevant fits by means of Eq. (\[eq:KT\_and\_electr\]). A typical LF-$\mu$SR data set, collected at 1.5K in a 30-mT longitudinal field, is also shown. (b) Temperature dependence of the nuclear relaxation rate $\sigma$, and (c) electronic relaxation rate $\Lambda$. While $\sigma$ is almost temperature-independent, $\Lambda$ shows a distinct increase below $T_c$.](Fig4){width="50.00000%"}

the magnets were quenched before the measurements and we made use of an active field-nulling facility. Without an external field, the relaxation is determined mostly by the nuclear magnetic moments, normally described by a Gaussian Kubo-Toyabe relaxation function.[@Kubo1967; @Yaouanc2011] A possible spontaneous field contribution, is accounted for by an additional exponential decay term. Consequently, the ZF-$\mu$SR spectra could be fitted by means of a combined Lorentzian and Gaussian Kubo-Toyabe relaxation function: $$\label{eq:KT_and_electr}
A_\mathrm{CKT} = A_\mathrm{s}\left[\frac{1}{3} + \frac{2}{3}(1 -
\sigma^{2}t^{2} - \Lambda t)\,
\mathrm{e}^{\left(-\frac{\sigma^{2}t^{2}}{2} - \Lambda t\right)} \right] + A_\mathrm{bg}.$$ Here $A_\mathrm{s}$ is the initial sample-related muon-spin asymmetry, whereas $A_\mathrm{bg}$ represents a time- and temperature-independent background. As already shown in the TF-$\mu$SR case (see Fig. \[fig:TF\_MuSR\]), both the background and the nuclear contributions to the decay are independent of temperature. This is clearly the case also with ZF-$\mu$SR \[see Fig. \[fig:ZF\_muSR\](b)\], where $\sigma(T)$ remains constant (within the experimental error) in the studied temperature range. On the other hand, the exponential component, related to the presence of spontaneous magnetic fields, shows a small yet distinct increase as the temperature is lowered below $T_c$ \[see Fig. \[fig:ZF\_muSR\](c)\].

Such an increase in $\Lambda(T)$, similar to that found also in Re$_{6}$(Zr,Hf),[@Singh2014; @Singh2017] represents the signature of spontaneously occurring magnetic fields and of TRS breaking in the Re$_{24}$Ti$_{5}$ noncentrosymmetric superconductor. Given the small size of the considered effect, to rule out the possibility of an impurity-induced relaxation (typically relevant at low temperatures), we performed auxiliary longitudinal-field (LF)-$\mu$SR measurements at 1.5K. As shown in Fig. \[fig:ZF\_muSR\](a), a field of 30mT only is sufficient to lock the muon spins and to completely decouple them from the weak spontaneous magnetic fields, thus removing any relaxation traces related to them.

Up to now, several NCSCs, including LaNiC$_2$,[@Hillier2009] Re$_6$(Zr,Hf),[@Singh2014; @Singh2017] and La$_7$Ir$_3$[@Barker2015] have been found to exhibit a TRS breaking in the superconducting state. Yet, in many others, as e.g., Mo$_3$Al$_2$C,[@bauer2010] Mg$_{10}$Ir$_{19}$B$_{16}$,[@Acze2010] Re$_3$W,[@Biswas2012] and PbTaSe$_2$,[@Wilson2017] the TRS is preserved. The Re$_{24}$Ti$_5$ considered here, a sister compound to Re$_6$(Zr,Hf), is a new member of the TRS-breaking NCSCs, despite a relatively reduced ASOC. This strongly suggests that, while the presence of an ASOC seems essential to induce a TRS breaking in NSSCs, its strength is not a crucial condition. Indeed, although LaNiC$_2$[@Hillier2009] has a much weaker ASOC compared to La$_7$Ir$_3$,[@Barker2015] the respective changes in zero-field muon relaxation rates are comparable ($\Delta$$\Lambda$ $\sim$ 0.01$\mu$s$^{-1}$). In our case, too, the replacement of the 5$d$ Hf with the 3$d$ Ti, reduces remarkably the ASOC, yet the effects on TRS breaking remain comparable. Hence, we believe that TRS breaking in NSCSs is mostly related to the crystal-structure symmetry and, to test such hypothesis, La$_7$T$_3$ compounds (T = transition metal, e.g., Ni, Pd, Rh, Pt) represent good candidates, since all of them exhibit a Th$_7$Fe$_3$-type crystal structure, with the 3$d$ to 5$d$ transition metals covering a wide ASOC range.

The spin-triplet states can give rise to spontaneous fields in the superconducting state, which break the TRS. Most of these TRS-broken phases exhibit nodes in the superconducting gap, as e.g., Sr$_2$RuO$_4$.[@Luke1998] However, in highly-symmetric systems, the TRS breaking can also occur in fully-gapped states.[@Agterberg1999] Thus, the cubic Re$_6$(Zr,Hf) [@Singh2014; @Singh2017] and Re$_{24}$Ti$_{5}$ or the hexagonal La$_7$Ir$_3$ [@Barker2015] all exhibit fully gapped superconducting states, but with TRS breaking. A point-group analysis of Re$_6$Zr [@Singh2014] reveals that a mixed singlet and triplet state is allowed to break the TRS. The continuous search for other low-symmetry NCSCs provides a good opportunity to find non-$s$-wave superconductors with TRS breaking, hence, furthering our understanding of the NCSC physics.

In summary, we investigated the noncentrosymmetric superconductor Re$_{24}$Ti$_{5}$ by means of $\mu$SR and TDO techniques. Bulk superconductivity with $T_c$ = 6K was characterized by magnetization, transport, and specific heat measurements. Both the low-temperature penetration depth, superfluid density and the zero-field specific-heat data reveal a nodeless superconductivity in Re$_{24}$Ti$_{5}$, well described by an isotropic $s$-wave model with a single gap. The spontaneous fields, which appear below $T_c$ and increase with decreasing temperature, provide strong evidence that the superconducting state of noncentrosymmetric Re$_{24}$Ti$_{5}$ breaks TRS and has an unconventional nature. This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grants No. 2017YFA0303100 and No. 2016YFA0300202), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 11474251), and the Schweizerische Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (SNF).
