---
abstract: |
    We compare the prompt intrinsic spectral properties of a sample of short Gamma–ray Bursts (GRBs) with the first 0.3 seconds (rest frame) of long GRBs observed by [*Fermi*]{}/GBM. We find that short GRBs and the first part of long GRBs lie on the same $E_{\rm
        p}$–$E_{\rm iso}$ correlation, that is parallel to the relation for the time averaged spectra of long GRBs. Moreover, they are indistinguishable in the $E_{\rm p}$–$L_{\rm iso}$ plane. This suggests that the emission mechanism is the same for short and for the beginning of long events, and both short and long GRBs are very similar phenomena, occurring on different timescales. If the central engine of a long GRB would stop after $\sim 0.3 \times
      (1+z)$ seconds the resulting event would be spectrally indistinguishable from a short GRB.
author:
- |
    G. Calderone$^{1}$[^1], G. Ghirlanda$^{1}$, G. Ghisellini$^{1}$, M. G. Bernardini$^{1}$, S. Campana$^{1}$,S. Covino$^{1}$, D’Avanzo$^{1}$, V. D’Elia$^{2,3}$, A. Melandri$^{1}$, R. Salvaterra$^{4}$, B. Sbarufatti$^{5,1}$,G. Tagliaferri$^{1}$\
    $^{1}$INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, via E. Bianchi 46, I–23807 Merate (LC), Italy\
    $^{2}$ASI–Science Data Centre, Via del Politecnico snc, I–00133 Rome, Italy\
    $^{3}$INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, via Frascati 33, I–00040 Monteporzio Catone (RM), Italy\
    $^{4}$INAF–IASF Milano, via E. Bassini 15, I–20133, Milano, Italy\
    $^{5}$Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA\
title: 'There is a short gamma–ray burst prompt phase at the beginning of each long one'
---

\[firstpage\]

gamma–ray burst: general

Introduction {#sec:intro}
============

Gamma–ray bursts (GRBs) are transient emission episodes of radiation detected at high energies. The first emission phase, detected at hard X–rays and $\gamma$–rays, lasts for $\sim$ 0.01 ms–100 s (prompt phase). Then, the bulk of emitted radiation shifts to lower energies and becomes observable at longer wavelengths, from X–rays to radio, with typical duration of $\sim$ days–months (afterglow phase). The observed duration of the prompt phase is characterised by the $T_{90}$ parameter, i.e. the time interval during which the central 90% of the counts are recorded by the detector. The distribution of $T_{90}$ of GRBs observed by the Burst And Transient Source Experiment (BATSE) on board the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory ([*GCRO*]{}) has been found to be bimodal with a separation at $\sim$ 2 s in the observer frame [@1993-Kouvelioutou-shortVsLong]. According to this finding, GRBs are classified either as [*short*]{} gamma–ray burst (SGRB) if $T_{90} <$ 2, or as [*long*]{} ones (LGRB) if $T_{90} >$ 2 s (but see @2013-Bromberg-ShortVsLongCollapsars). Besides, the prompt phase of SGRBs is characterised by harder spectra [@1993-Kouvelioutou-shortVsLong] and smaller spectral lags between different energy bands [@2000-Norris-SpecLag] with respect to the prompt phase of LGRBs.

For bursts with reliable redshift estimates, it has been shown that SGRBs are systematically less energetic than LGRBs, with total X and $\gamma$–ray emitted energies smaller by a factor $\sim$ 10–100 [@2009-Ghirlanda-ShortVsLong]. Also, the afterglows of SGRBs, when detected, are correspondingly dimmer than those of LGRBs, but similar in other respects [@2008-Gehrels-PromptAfterglow; @2013-Margutti-PromptAfterglowConn; @2014-DAvanzo-SBAT8]. Finally, several nearby ($z<0.5$) long GRBs have been associated with explosions of core–collapse supernovae [@2012-Hjorth-GRB-SN-Connection], while there is no similar evidence for short bursts [@2013-Berger-SGRB]. These findings suggest that short and long GRBs might originate from different progenitors (@2006-Meszaros-GRB [@2013-Berger-SGRB]).

Observationally, the most important difference between short and long GRBs is their $T_{90}$ duration. A first attempt to compare the spectral properties of short and long GRBs detected by [ *CGRO*]{}/BATSE showed that (i) the difference in hardness could be due to a harder low energy spectral index of short GRBs rather than a harder peak energy and (ii) that the spectra of SGRBs and the first 1–2 s of LGRBs appear similar [@2004-Ghirlanda-SpectraSGRB]. These results suggested that the engine might be similar in the two classes, but the activity would last longer in the case of LGRBs [@2010ApJ...725..225G]. Also, @2002-Nakar-TempoPropSGRB found that the ratio of the shortest pulse duration to the total burst duration for both short and the first 1–2 s of long GRBs were comparable.

With the advent of the Gamma Burst Monitor (GBM) on board [*Fermi*]{}, it became possible to compare the spectral properties of large samples of short and long GRBs and to compare them with those detected by [ *CGRO*]{}/BATSE. @2011-Nava-GBMBatseComparison showed that long and short GRBs occupy different regions in the observer frame hardness (defined by the peak of the $\nu F_\nu$ spectrum) versus fluence, with SGRBs having smaller fluences than long events. This also suggested that the possible selection of fluence limited samples for the comparison of SGRBs and LGRBs could introduce biases.

The availability of redshift estimates for long GRBs allowed one to estimate their rest frame (intrinsic) spectral properties, and to highlight a few correlations among them (see @2006-GhirlandaRev-GRBCorrCosmo for a review). @2002-Amati-rel found that the rest frame $\nu L_{\nu}$ peak energy ($E_{\rm p}$) is correlated with the total energy emitted in the 1 keV–10 MeV energy range (under the hypothesis of isotropic emission, $E_{\rm iso}$), with a slope of $\sim$ 0.5. @2004-Yonetoku-EpLiso found a correlation between $E_{\rm p}$ and the isotropic peak luminosity evaluated at the flux peak over an interval of 1 s ($L_{\rm p,iso}$), with a slope of $\sim$ 0.4. The latter correlation is valid also when considering the time resolved spectral quantities $E_{\rm p}(t)$ and $L_{\rm iso} (t)$ of a single burst, i.e. the evolutionary tracks of GRB spectra in the $E_{\rm
  p}$–$L_{\rm iso}$ plane align with the Yonetoku relation [@2009-Firmani-TimeResolvedCorrel; @2010-Ghirlanda-TimeResolvedFermi; @2012-Frontera-TimeResolvCorr].

With the fast slewing [*Swift*]{} satellite [@2004-Gehrels-Swift] it became possible to localize the X–ray afterglows of short GRBs, and estimate their redshifts by means of the associated host galaxies [@2005-Gehrels-ShortAfterglow]. The comparison of intrinsic spectral properties of short and long GRBs have shown that short GRBs are consistent with the Yonetoku relation, but are significant outliers of the Amati relation [@2006-Amati-rel-update; @2008-Amati-rel-5SGRB; @2009-Ghirlanda-ShortVsLong; @2014-DAvanzo-SBAT8]. However, by analyzing a sample of 7 short GRBs, @2012-ZhangRevisitingLongShortClassif suggest that short GRBs might follow a parallel Amati relation at lower values of $E_{\rm
  iso}$. Moreover, the SGRBs follow the same three parameter correlation ($E_{\rm X,iso}$–$E_{\rm \gamma,iso}$–$E_{\rm p}$) valid for long GRBs [@2012-Bernardini-UnivScalingRel3Param; @2013-Margutti-PromptAfterglowConn]. The isotropic luminosities are similar in both short and long GRBs, but the former are less energetic than the latter by a factor similar to the ratio of their durations. When considering the time averaged spectra, short GRBs have harder low–energy spectral index, but this difference vanishes when comparing the SGRBs with only the first 1–2 s of long GRBs [@2009-Ghirlanda-ShortVsLong].

Also the time resolved spectroscopy has shown that the observed peak energy tracks the flux evolution in both short and long GRBs [@2010ApJ...725..225G; @2011-Ghirlanda-ShortVsLong], suggesting a common physical mechanism linking these quantities. The existence of a time resolved correlation between $E_{\rm p}(t)$ and $L_{\rm
  iso}(t)$ was also shown to hold in short GRBs [@2011-Ghirlanda-ShortVsLong]. This is the most compelling evidence that the $E_{\rm p}(t)$–$L_{\rm iso}(t)$ correlation holding in long and short GRBs (with similar slope and normalization) hints to a common origin which could be related to the emission mechanism [@2011-Ghirlanda-ShortVsLong] and that the corresponding Yonetoku correlation (holding between time integrated properties) cannot be subject to strong selection effects. An interesting hypothesis discussed in @2009-Ghirlanda-ShortVsLong [@2011-Ghirlanda-ShortVsLong; @2013ApJ...770...32G] is that both short and long GRBs may share a common emission process, and that the observed differences may be ascribed to the different engine lifetime of their progenitors.

Yet, the comparison of short and long GRBs in search for possible similarities or differences should account for their possible different redshift distributions. While several LGRBs have their redshift measured, the population of short bursts still suffers from a lack of redshift measures. However, recent collection of small, well defined, samples of SGRBs with measured redshifts [e.g. @2014-DAvanzo-SBAT8] allowed us to compare the energetic properties of short and long events in their rest frame.

The aim of this work is to further explore the similarities between short and long GRBs by comparing their intrinsic (i.e. rest frame) spectral properties estimated on the same rest frame time scales. The average $T_{90} / (1+z)$ duration of the short GRBs with reliable (spectroscopic) redshifts and without X–ray extended emission in the @2014-DAvanzo-SBAT8 sample is 0.3 s (10 bursts). This will be our reference time scale to perform spectral analysis of the first part of long GRBs, and compare the results with those of short GRBs.

Throughout the paper, we assume a $\Lambda$CDM cosmology with H$_0$ = 71 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_{\rm m}$ = 0.27, $\Omega_\Lambda$ = 0.73.

The sample {#sec-sample}
==========

Since we aim to study the prompt emission spectral properties and energetic/luminosity of GRBs, we need a broad energy coverage in order to determine where the peak energy is. While [*Swift*]{}/BAT has a limited energy range (15–150keV) which is not suited for GRB prompt emission spectral characterization, the GBM instrument on board [ *Fermi*]{} covers almost 2 orders of magnitude in energy with the NaI detectors (8keV–1MeV) and can extend this energy range to a few tens of MeV with the inclusion of the data of the BGO detectors. Hence we selected all GRBs observed by [*Fermi*]{}/GBM up to December 2013 with a redshift estimate. This amounts to 64 long and 7 short GRBs.

Among the long ones we discarded: 2 GRBs with missing response matrix files; 2 GRBs observed with a non–standard Low Level Threshold[^2]; 3 GRBs whose first part was missed by the GBM; 12 GRBs for which we could not constrain either the low energy spectral index or the peak energy (§\[sec-data\_an\]). The final LGRB sample comprises 45 long bursts.

[*Fermi*]{}/GBM observed 7 short GRBs with known redshift. To this sample we added the SGRB flux limited sample of 12 sources with redshift discussed in @2014-DAvanzo-SBAT8 [hereafter D14 sample], but discarded: GRB 080905A since its redshift is likely not accurate, GRB 090426 and GRB 100816A since their classification as short GRB is debated. Four GRBs in the D14 sample were also in the GBM sample: for these bursts we considered the results reported in D14. The final SGRB sample comprises 3 GRB observed with [*Fermi*]{}/GBM and 9 from D14.

The short GRB sample, although relatively small, stems from a flux limited sample of short GRB with a redshift completeness of $\sim$70% [@2014-DAvanzo-SBAT8]. We dropped three burst from this sample, hence the redshift completeness drops to $\sim$ 60%, but we added three more bursts detected by [*Fermi*]{}/GBM. The distributions of low–energy spectral index in both our short sample and the corresponding one[^3] in the @2014-Gruber-GBMCat-4yr catalog are actually indistinguishable (K–S test probability: 0.47). Since the spectral index is a redshift independent property we assume that our short GRB sample is a reasonably good representation of the parent distribution of short GRBs observable with currently available detectors.

The total (LGRB+SGRB) comprises 57 bursts (Tab.\[tab1\]). Fig. \[fig-z\] shows the redshift distribution for both the SGRB and LGRB samples (references for redshift estimates are given in Tab.\[tab1\]).

![Redshift distribution for both the SGRB (12) and LGRB (45) bursts (references for redshift estimates are given in Tab.\[tab1\]).[]{data-label="fig-z"}](z){width=".45\textwidth"}

Data analysis {#sec-data_an}
=============

Our spectral analysis aims at estimating the intrinsic peak energy ($E_{\rm p}$), isotropic equivalent luminosity ($L_{\rm iso}$) and emitted energy ($E_{\rm iso}$) for the GRBs in our sample. For the 3 short GRBs observed by [*Fermi*]{}/GBM we performed a spectral analysis on the entire duration of the burst ([*short*]{} analysis). For the remaining 9 SGRB we considered the spectral properties relative to the time integrated emission reported in the D14 paper ([*short D14*]{}). For the 45 long GRBs we perform two different spectral analysis: one for the first 0.3 s in the rest frame (corresponding to $0.3 \times (1+z)$ s in the observer frame, [ *first*]{} analysis) and one for the whole duration of the burst ([ *whole*]{} analysis). All $E_{\rm iso}$ and $L_{\rm iso}$ quantities are evaluated in the (rest frame) energy range 1 keV–10 MeV.

All data analysis has been carried according to the procedure outlined below.

Detectors, energy selection and background fitting
--------------------------------------------------

For each GRB we selected the most illuminated NaI detector(s), and the corresponding BGO one. The BGO detector is always included, even if there is no significant detection above background. The energy selection is in the range 8–800 keV for NaI detectors, and 200 keV–35 MeV for BGO ones. Systematic residuals at $\sim$ 33 keV of the NaI detectors[^4] are neglected.

For each channel of all detectors we perform a polynomial fit (up to the third order) to the observed background count rate in the CSPEC files,[^5] on a time interval before and after the burst longer than the burst duration (typically $\gtrsim$ 100 s). The length of the background time intervals is progressively increased until the uncertainties on the expected background counts during the burst becomes smaller than their intrinsic statistical fluctuations. This approach provides an objective way to select the background time intervals. We also checked that the background fit provide an adequate fit for all energy channels by means of $\chi^2$ goodness–of–fit test. For long bursts, we used exactly the same background model for both the [*first*]{} and [*whole*]{} analysis.

The detectors used and the background time selections for each burst are shown in Tab. \[tab1\].

Time selection
--------------

For the GRB spectral analysis we used the TTE data files[^6] to select the counts in the appropriate time intervals: either the first 0.3 seconds (rest frame) for the [*first*]{} analysis, or the whole burst duration for both the [*short*]{} and [*whole*]{} analysis.

For the [*short*]{} and [*whole*]{} analysis of GRBs present in both our sample and the @2014-Gruber-GBMCat-4yr catalog we consider their time selection. This choice allows us to compare our results with those of @2014-Gruber-GBMCat-4yr, as discussed in §\[cmp-g14\]. For the other bursts the time selection was performed by a visual inspection of the count rate light curves.

For the [*first*]{} analysis we searched for the first occurrence of a 0.3 s long (rest frame) time bin in which the counts in all NaI detectors were significantly (at 3$\sigma$ level) above the expected background. The search has been performed with a 0.2 s resolution starting at 10 s before the trigger time.

The time selections for each burst are shown in Tab. \[tab2\].

Spectral fitting {#sec-specfit}
----------------

The GRB spectral models used for spectral analysis are a modified version[^7] of either the cutoff power law or the Band model [@1993-Band], in which the free parameters are:

-   `log_Ep`: the logarithm of the $\nu F_{\nu}$ peak energy in keV;

-   `alpha`: the photon spectral index for energies smaller than the peak energy;

-   `beta` (only for the Band model): the photon spectral index for energies greater than the peak energy;

-   `log_F`: the logarithm of the integrated flux in the rest frame energy range 1 keV–10 MeV.

The spectral indices are bounded to be `alpha` $>-2$ and $-6 <
$ `beta` $ <-1.7$. For the [*whole*]{} spectral analysis we also included detectors effective area correction as free parameters, bounded in the range 0.5–2. Whenever the resulting area corrections are not constrained we set all calibration factors to one. The `log_F` parameter is used to estimate the intrinsic isotropic luminosity $L_{\rm iso} = 4 \pi D_{\rm L}^2 \times F$, without the need to propagate the uncertainties on the other parameters. Finally, isotropic emitted energy is estimated as $E_{\rm iso} = L_{\rm iso}
\Delta T_{\rm rest}$, where $\Delta T_{\rm rest} \times (1+z)$ is the spectrum integration time.

The spectral model is folded with the detector response matrix, summed with the background counts expected in the same time interval, and compared to the observed counts by means of the Cash statistic [@1979-Cash-Cstat] with Castor normalization (C–STAT). The model fitting is performed with `xspec` ver. 12.8.1g [@1996-Arnaud-xspec] by minimizing the C–STAT value. We always used the detector maximum energy resolution, i.e. we did not rebin the channels.

The choice of the spectral model (cutoff power law or Band) is performed according to the following criterion: for each burst we started with the Band model with both spectral indices free to vary in the minimization process. If the `beta` parameter uncertainty is larger than a nominal threshold of 0.5, but still significantly lower than the `alpha` parameter, we fixed `beta` to its typical value, namely –2.3 [@1993-Band; @2002-Ghirlanda-TimeResolvSpecBrightGRB], and repeat the fit. If `beta` hits the lower limit (–6) we use the cutoff power law model instead of the Band model. If `beta` is $>-2$ and `alpha`$>$`beta` we consider the resulting $E_{\rm p}$ and $L_{\rm iso}$ as lower limits. The true location of the $\nu
F{\nu}$ peak likely lies on the extrapolation of the spectrum actually constrained by the data. By assuming `alpha`=–1 [the typical value for this parameter, @2011-Nava-438FermiGRB], this extrapolation lies on a line of slope 1 in the $E_{\rm p}$–$L_{\rm
  iso}$ plane.

In 12 cases we could not detect a curvature in the spectrum, i.e. we could not constrain either the `alpha` or the `log_Ep` parameters. These bursts were discarded from our sample (§\[sec-sample\]).

The parameter uncertainties (quoted at 1$\sigma$) for the [*whole*]{} analysis are estimated with the usual $\Delta \chi^2$ method [@1976-Avni-DeltaChisqUncert; @1976-Cash-DeltaChisqUncert]. For the [*short*]{} and [*first*]{} analysis we adopted a different approach since the counts in the high–energy channels of the detectors are often very low. In these cases we start by performing a fit in the usual way, and use the best fit parameter estimates to simulate several data sets for each detector (using the `fakeit` command). Then we run the fitting process on the mock data sets, and consider the distribution of the resulting best fit parameters. The final uncertainties are estimated as the central interval containing 68.3% of the best fit values. The simulation iterates until the lower and upper limits of the confidence interval change by less than 5%. Typically 400–600 simulations are required to satisfy the convergence criterion. This Monte Carlo method is described in detail in @2007-nr-3rd [their Sect. 15.6.1].

In §\[cmp-g14\] we compare the results of our [*whole*]{} analysis to those of @2014-Gruber-GBMCat-4yr, for the bursts present in both samples, and show that the two methods produce very similar results. However, our method ensures a homogeneous approach in all our spectral analysis: we established an objective criterion to select the background time intervals, and used exactly the same background model in both the [*first*]{} and [*whole*]{} analysis. The use of logarithmic quantities in our spectral model results in simpler and more symmetric parameter uncertainties, with respect to their linear counterparts [e.g. @2007-Cabrera-SpAnalysisSwift-wZ]. Also, the use of the integrated flux as model parameter, instead of the flux at a given energy, allows us to directly evaluate the uncertainties on $L_{\rm iso}$, avoiding the necessity to estimate the parameter covariance matrix for error propagation. Finally, the use of Monte Carlo simulations in the [*short*]{} and [*first*]{} analysis provide reliable parameter uncertainties even in the low count regime, when the assumption that the C–STAT value is drawn from a $\chi^2$ distribution is not reliable.

Results
-------

The results of spectral analysis, as well as the spectral quantities reported in D14 for the short GRB sample, are shown in Tab. \[tab2\]. The relevant quantities for the [*short*]{}, [ *first*]{} and [*whole*]{} sub samples are shown in Fig. \[fig-histo\]. The lower limits for $E_{\rm p}$ and $E_{\rm
  iso}$ (2 in the [*short*]{}, 4 in the [*first*]{} and 3 in the [ *whole*]{} analysis, respectively) are not accounted for in the histograms.

![image](h_alpha){width=".48\textwidth"} ![image](h_ep){width=".48\textwidth"}\
![image](h_eiso){width=".48\textwidth"} ![image](h_liso){width=".48\textwidth"}

Fig. \[fig-ratio\] (left panel) shows the ratio of [*first*]{} to [*whole*]{} peak energy vs. the same ratio of $E_{\rm iso}$. The blue dashed lines are the median values of both ratios. The right panel shows the $E_{\rm iso, whole} / E_{\rm iso, first}$ ratio vs. $\Delta
T_{\rm whole} / \Delta T_{\rm first}$. The blue dashed line is the 1:1 line. The numbers beside the symbols are the GRB identifiers shown in Table \[tab1\] and \[tab2\].

![image](ratio){width=".48\textwidth"} ![image](ratio_eiso_t){width=".48\textwidth"}

Finally, in Fig. \[fig-corr1\] and \[fig-corr2\] we show the location of all bursts in the $E_{\rm p}$–$E_{\rm iso}$ and $E_{\rm
  p}$–$L_{\rm iso}$ planes respectively. The lower limits are shown with arrows of slope 1, as discussed in §\[sec-specfit\].

Notes on individual bursts {#sec-notes}
--------------------------

-   GRB 091024 [@2011-Gruber-091024; @2014-Nappo-Afterglow091024]: the GBM data are separated in two burst intervals, hence this GRB appear twice in Tab. \[tab1\] (ID 23). The first interval is actually a precursor and it is analysed according to the [*first*]{} prescription. The second interval comprises a second precursor and the main event. The [*first*]{} analysis at the beginning of the main event did not provide reliable constraints on the peak energy, hence we consider only the [ *whole*]{} analysis.

-   GRB 110213: for this burst the [*first*]{} analysis did not provide reliable constraints on the peak energy because the signal is significantly background dominated, hence we consider only the [*whole*]{} analysis.

-   GRB 120711A and GRB 120716A show a precursor in their light curve. For these bursts we analysed the precursor spectra according to the [*first*]{} analysis.

-   GRB 130427A: the GBM data are unreliable after $\sim$ 4 seconds from the trigger since the large amount of recorded events, due to the exceptional brightness of this burst, saturated the available bandwidth [@2014-Preece-GBM130427]. Hence we consider only the [*first*]{} analysis for this burst.

By taking into account these notes the final subsamples comprises: $$\begin{aligned}
  \nonumber
  Short: \ {\rm 12\ bursts,\ with\ 2\ lower\ limits}\\
  \nonumber
  First: \ {\rm 43\ bursts,\ with\ 4\ lower\ limits}\\
  \nonumber
  Whole: \ {\rm 44\ bursts,\ with\ 3\ lower\ limits}\end{aligned}$$

$E_{\rm p}$–$E_{\rm iso}$ and $E_{\rm p}$–$L_{\rm iso}$ correlations
--------------------------------------------------------------------

We use the results of the spectral analysis to test the spectral–energy correlations in the $E_{\rm p}$–$E_{\rm iso}$ and $E_{\rm p}$–$L_{\rm iso}$ planes. The former is the Amati relation, while the second is only similar to the Yonetoku relation, since we use the $L_{\rm iso}$ values estimated on the time averaged spectra, rather than the peak isotropic luminosity $L_{\rm p,iso}$ [@2004-Yonetoku-EpLiso].

We estimate the Spearman rank correlation coefficients and the associated chance probability for the [*short*]{}, [*first*]{} and [*whole*]{} results. Also, we estimate the best fit correlations by applying the unweighted bisector method [@1990-Isobe-LinearRegression]. Lower limits and precursor data are not considered in this analysis. The histograms of the residuals from the best fit line, once projected on a scale perpendicular to the line itself, are fitted with a Gaussian function in order to estimate the scatter ($\sigma_{\rm sc}$) from the best fit. Results are shown in Tab.\[tab-corr\].

In Fig. \[fig-corr1\] we show the best fit correlations (solid lines) on the $E_{\rm p}$–$E_{\rm iso}$ plane for the [ *short*]{} (purple), [*first*]{} (blue) and [*whole*]{} (red) results, as well as the histograms of residuals (inset plots). For comparison we also plot the corresponding relations from the total sample of @2012-Nava-Amati (black dashed line) and from both the short and long GRB sample of @2012-ZhangRevisitingLongShortClassif (double dot–dashed lines). In Fig. \[fig-corr2\] we show the corresponding results in the $E_{\rm p}$–$L_{\rm iso}$ plane. For comparison we show the $E_{\rm p}$–$L_{\rm p,iso}$ relations from the total sample of @2012-Nava-Amati (black dashed line) and from the combined short and long GRB sample of @2012-ZhangRevisitingLongShortClassif (double dot–dashed lines).

   [**Correlation**]{}   [**Results**]{}   [**No. GRBs**]{}   [**$A$**]{}   [**$B$**]{}   [**$\gamma$**]{}   [**$\sigma_{\rm sc}$**]{}   [**$\rho_{\rm s}$**]{}   [**P$_{\rm chance}$**]{}
  --------------------- ----------------- ------------------ ------------- ------------- ------------------ --------------------------- ------------------------ --------------------------
                           [*short*]{}            10             51.45         2.99       0.59 $\pm$ 0.07              0.15                       0.71                      0.02
                           [*first*]{}            39             51.62         2.92       0.65 $\pm$ 0.07              0.29                       0.50               $1\times 10^{-3}$
                           [*whole*]{}            41             53.21         2.73       0.57 $\pm$ 0.06              0.25                       0.73               $5\times 10^{-8}$
                           [*short*]{}            10             52.28         2.99       0.63 $\pm$ 0.11              0.30                       0.50                      0.14
                           [*first*]{}            39             52.15         2.92       0.65 $\pm$ 0.07              0.29                       0.50               $1\times 10^{-3}$
                           [*whole*]{}            41             51.92         2.73       0.58 $\pm$ 0.07              0.29                       0.7                $4\times 10^{-7}$

![image](scatter){width="\textwidth"}

![image](scatter_yone){width="\textwidth"}\

Discussion and conclusions
==========================

We performed the spectral analysis of a sample long GRBs observed by [*Fermi*]{}/GBM with a redshift estimate, using time integration equal to 0.3 s rest frame ([*first*]{} analysis) and to the whole burst duration ([*whole*]{} analysis). Besides, we considered a sample of short GRBs ([*short*]{} analysis), both by performing spectral analysis of [*Fermi*]{}/GBM data and by reporting data from @2014-DAvanzo-SBAT8 [D14 sample]. Our aim is to compare the results of the [*first*]{} analysis to those of the [*short*]{} and [*whole*]{} analysis. The comparison of the relevant quantities are shown in Fig. \[fig-histo\]. Tab. \[tab-KS\] shows the probability that the distributions of the quantities shown in Fig. \[fig-histo\] are drawn from the same parent population.

The distributions of both $E_{\rm p}$ and $L_{\rm iso}$ are similar for the the [*short*]{}, [*first*]{} and [*whole*]{} results. The distributions of low energy spectral index (`alpha`) for the [*short*]{} and [*first*]{} results are very similar, but the distribution for the [*whole*]{} results is significantly different (K–S test probabilities $5.3 \times 10^{-5}$ and $\mathbf{8.9 \times
  10^{-4}}$, when compared to [*first*]{} and [*short*]{} results respectively), with the latter showing lower values of `alpha`. Also, the distribution of $E_{\rm iso}$ of the [*whole*]{} results is significantly different from the [*first*]{} and [*short*]{} results (K–S test probability: $4.1 \times 10^{-13}$ and $\mathbf{2.1 \times
  10^{-6}}$, when compared to [*first*]{} and [*short*]{} results respectively), with the [*whole*]{} results lying a factor of a few tens above the others.

   [**Quantity**]{}    [**[*Short*]{} vs. [*First*]{}**]{}   [**[*Whole*]{} vs. [*First*]{}**]{}   [**[*Whole*]{} vs. [*Short*]{}**]{}
  ------------------- ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
         alpha                        0.83                          $5.3 \times 10^{-5}$                  $8.9 \times 10^{-4}$
    log $E_{\rm p}$                   0.71                                  0.11                                  0.10
   log $E_{\rm iso}$                  0.43                          $4.1 \times 10^{-13}$                 $2.1 \times 10^{-6}$
   log $L_{\rm iso}$                  0.54                                  0.19                                  0.29

The peak energy $E_{\rm p}$ of long GRBs, going from the first 0.3 s (rest frame) to the whole burst duration, evolves either to lower or higher energies, hence we do not find strong evidence for hard–to–soft evolution of the peak energy. The logarithmic median value of the [*whole*]{} to [*first*]{} $E_{\rm p}$ ratio is $\sim$ 0.7 (Fig. \[fig-ratio\], left panel). The total emitted energy $E_{\rm iso}$ increases by a factor 5–10$^3$, with a logarithmic median of $\sim$ 35. It is not clear what drives the evolution of $E_{\rm p}$ towards either lower or higher energies, since the $E_{\rm p, whole} / E_{\rm p, first}$ ratio does not show a clear correlation with any other quantity. The main driver for the $E_{\rm iso}$ evolution is the total burst duration $\Delta T_{\rm
  whole,rest}$, i.e. longer burst likely evolve towards higher $E_{\rm
  iso}$ (Fig. \[fig-ratio\], right panel).

As discussed in §\[sec-sample\] the short GRB sample, although relatively small when compared to the long sample, is a reasonably good representation of the parent distribution of short GRBs observable with currently available detectors. Moreover, the short GRB sample is large enough to provide evidence for significant different distributions of `alpha` and $E_{\rm iso}$ when compared to the [*whole*]{} sample. Hence the K–S tests to compare the spectral properties of the [*short*]{} and [*first*]{} samples are reliable, and the corresponding distributions are actually indistinguishable, i.e. we are unable to distinguish a short GRB from the first 0.3 seconds of a long one with currently available detectors. Clearly, as new redshift estimates for SGRB become available, our results may need to be reconsidered.

The plot of the $E_{\rm p}$–$E_{\rm iso}$ plane is shown in Fig. \[fig-corr1\]. There is a clear correlation between $E_{\rm
  p}$ and $E_{\rm iso}$ for the [*whole*]{} results, with a chance probability of obtaining a higher value of the Spearman’s rank correlation of $\sim 10^{-7}$ (Tab. \[tab-corr\]). In the $E_{\rm
  p}$–$E_{\rm iso}$ plane this is the well known Amati relation [@2002-Amati-rel]. The correlation slope and scatter (0.57$\pm$0.06 and 0.25) are very similar to the ones found in @2012-Nava-Amati for their total sample (0.55$\pm$0.02, 0.23), and in @2012-ZhangRevisitingLongShortClassif for their long GRB sample (0.51$\pm$0.03). For the [*first*]{} results we found a new $E_{\rm p}$–$E_{\rm iso}$ relation with a probability $\sim 10^{-3}$ of being spurious. The best fit [*whole*]{} relation lies at 3–4 $\sigma_{\rm sc}$ away from the [*first*]{} relation, hence the [ *first*]{} and [*whole*]{} populations are well separated in the $E_{\rm
  p}$–$E_{\rm iso}$ plane. The [*short*]{} GRBs alone do not provide a strong statistical evidence for the existence of such a correlation ($P_{\rm chance} = 0.02$). However, all [*short*]{} results lie within 2$\sigma_{\rm sc}$ from the best fit relation for the [ *first*]{} results. Moreover, the best fit [*short*]{} correlation, if it actually exists, lies very close to the [*first*]{} one, and significantly away from the [*whole*]{} one. Therefore, the [ *short*]{} and [*first*]{} results are actually indistinguishable in the $E_{\rm p}$–$E_{\rm iso}$ plane. The lower limits for $E_{\rm p}$ and $E_{\rm iso}$ were not considered in the correlation analysis. However, the true values of $E_{\rm p}$ and $E_{\rm iso}$ of the [ *short*]{} and [*first*]{} population are not supposed to lie closer to the [*whole*]{} correlation than their lower limits, as shown by the arrows in Fig. \[fig-corr1\]. Hence our conclusions can not be hampered by the presence of lower limits. GRB precursors, when present, also lie in the [*short*]{}–[*first*]{} region.

In the $E_{\rm p}$–$L_{\rm iso}$ (Fig. \[fig-corr2\]) similar considerations apply: there is a strong correlation for the [ *whole*]{} results, a marginally significant correlation for the [ *first*]{} results[^8], and a weak correlation for the [*short*]{} results. However, in the $E_{\rm
  p}$–$L_{\rm iso}$ plane all correlations overlap and are very similar. Note that these correlations are not equivalent to the Yonetoku relation, since we used the $L_{\rm iso}$ values estimated on the time averaged spectra, rather than the peak isotropic luminosity $L_{\rm p,iso}$ [@2004-Yonetoku-EpLiso]. Hence, we do not expect to find the same results found in literature. In particular we expect our results to lie at lower $L_{\rm iso}$ since the peak luminosity is by definition the highest luminosity for each burst. Indeed the Yonetoku relation found in @2012-Nava-Amati for their total sample, and by @2012-ZhangRevisitingLongShortClassif for their combined short and long sample, lie on the right of our best fit correlation. Nevertheless, our analysis shows that the $E_{\rm
  p}$–$L_{\rm iso}$ relation turns out to be very similar for the [*first*]{} and [*short*]{} results (under the assumption that the latter actually exists). Hence, these correlations are possibly the manifestation of the same physical process acting in all GRBs, and even in small temporal intervals within a single GRB.

It has been debated if the Ep-Eiso and Ep-Liso correlation are affected by selection effects [@2005-Preece-TestingGRBRelationships; @2005-Nakar-OutliersOf-EpEisoRelation; @2007-Butler-CompleteCatalogSwift-SpectraDuration; @2009-Butler-GeneralizedTestSelectionEffects-Correlations; @2011-Shahmoradi-ImpactOfDetectorThreshold; @2012-Kocevski-OriginOfHighEnergyCorrelations]. The possible existence of similar correlation within individual GRBs, i.e. between the peak energy and the luminosity as a function of time in a single GRB [@2009-Firmani-TimeResolvedCorrel; @2010-Ghirlanda-TimeResolvedFermi; @2011-Ghirlanda-ShortVsLong; @2011-Ghirlanda-SpectralEvolutionFermiSGRB; @2012-Frontera-TimeResolvCorr] seems to point to a physical origin of these correlations. Similarly the use of a flux limited complete sample of long GRBs seems to support the idea that instrumental selection effects are not shaping these correlations [@2012-Nava-Amati; @2012-Ghirlanda-EpLisoSelectionEffects]. Hence these correlations are likely the manifestation of fundamental GRB properties. Since our correlations for the [*whole*]{} analysis (Tab. \[tab-corr\]) are very similar to those found in literature we do not expect our long sample to be strongly biased by selection effects. As a consequence, also the [*first*]{} correlation is not biased, since the sample is the same. The [*short*]{} analysis, on the other hand, has been performed on a flux limited short GRB sample with a redshift completeness of $\sim$ 60%, hence we do not expect the selection effects (beyond the limiting flux threshold) to play a dominant role.

The 0.3 s (rest frame) time scale chosen for the [*first*]{} analysis has a clear interpretation: it is the representative duration of the short GRBs in the D14 catalog. Since the main driver for the $E_{\rm
  iso}$ evolution is the integration time (Fig. \[fig-ratio\], right panel), a longer timescale would result in higher values of $E_{\rm
  iso,first}$. Hence, in order to obtain significantly higher (or lower) values of $E_{\rm iso}$, we should overcome the intrinsic scatter of the correlations, namely 0.25–0.3 dex (a factor $\sim$ 2, i.e. $\Delta T_{\rm first} \lesssim$ 0.15 s or $\Delta T_{\rm first}
\gtrsim$ 0.6 s).

In summary, we found that the intrinsic spectral properties (peak energy and luminosity) of both the short GRBs and the first 0.3 s (rest frame) of long ones are actually indistinguishable. Hence if the central engine of a long GRB would stop working after $\sim$ 0.3 s, we would have no means to distinguish it from a genuine short GRB. Clearly, short and long GRBs remains two distinct phenomena, each one with its own duration. In particular short GRBs lasts longer or shorter than 0.3 s. Likewise, we do not expect the short–like phase at the beginning of long GRBs to always lasts 0.3 s. Our findings are in agreement with those in @2009-Ghirlanda-ShortVsLong, which found no differences in the (observed) spectral properties of short GRBs and the first 1–2 s of long GRBs. We extended this work by comparing the intrinsic (rest frame) properties rather than the observed ones.

Moreover, we found that the spectral quantities in the first 0.3 s of long GRBs define new $E_{\rm p}$–$E_{\rm iso}$ and $E_{\rm
  p}$–$L_{\rm iso}$ correlations. These correlations are possibly the manifestation of an underlying physical process common to all GRBs, despite the possibly different progenitors of short and long GRBs, and the great variety of energetics and spectral properties involved.

[**ACKNOWLEDGMENTS**]{}

We gratefully acknowledge the Referee for the useful comments and suggestions which greatly improved the paper. The research activity of A. Melandri, M.G. Bernardini and P. D’Avanzo is supported by ASI grant INAF I/004/11/1. G. Calderone was supported by PRIN INAF 2011 (1.05.01.09.15).

L., 2006, , 372, 233

L., 2008, in [Bianco]{} C. L., [Xue]{} S.-S., eds, Relativistic Astrophysics Vol. 966 of American Institute of Physics Conference Series, [Spectrum-Energy Correlations and Swift GRBs]{}. pp 3–6

L., et al., 2002, , 390, 81

K. A., 1996, in [Jacoby]{} G. H., [Barnes]{} J., eds, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V Vol. 101 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, [XSPEC: The First Ten Years]{}. p. 17

Y., 1976, , 210, 642

D., et al., 1993, , 413, 281

D. L., [Preece]{} R. D., 2005, , 627, 319

E., 2013, arXiv:1311.2603

Berger E., M. Rauch M., 2008, GCN 8542

M. G., [Margutti]{} R., [Zaninoni]{} E., [Chincarini]{} G., 2012, , 425, 1199

O., [Nakar]{} E., [Piran]{} T., [Sari]{} R., 2013, , 764, 179

N. R., [Kocevski]{} D., [Bloom]{} J. S., 2009, , 694, 76

N. R., [Kocevski]{} D., [Bloom]{} J. S., [Curtis]{} J. L., 2007, , 671, 656

J. I., [Firmani]{} C., [Avila-Reese]{} V., [Ghirlanda]{} G., [Ghisellini]{} G., [Nava]{} L., 2007, , 382, 342

W., 1976, , 52, 307

W., 1979, , 228, 939

Cenko S. B., et al., 2009a, GCN 9053

Cenko S. B., et al., 2009b, GCN 9518

Chornock R., Berger E., Fox D., 2011, GCN 11538

Chornock R., et al., 2009a, GCN 9028

Chornock R., et al., 2009b, GCN 9243

Chornock R., Lunnan R., Berger E., 2013, GCN 15307

Cucchiara A., et al., 2008, GCN 8713

Cucchiara A., et al., 2009a, GCN 9873

Cucchiara A., et al., 2009b, GCN 10031

Cucchiara A., et al., 2009c, GCN 10065

Cucchiara A., et al., 2009d, GCN 10202

Cucchiara A., et al., 2010, GCN 10606

Cucchiara A., et al., 2012, GCN 12865

Cucchiara A., et al., 2013, GCN 14687

D’Avanzo P., et al., 2011, GCN 12284

P., [Salvaterra]{} R., [Bernardini]{} M. G., [Nava]{} L., [Campana]{} S., [Covino]{} S., [D’Elia]{} V., [Ghirlanda]{} G., [Ghisellini]{} G., [Melandri]{} A., [Sbarufatti]{} B., [Vergani]{} S. D., [Tagliaferri]{} G., 2014, arXiv:1405.5131

de Ugarte Postigo A., et al., 2009, GCN 8766

de Ugarte Postigo A., et al., 2013, GCN 15470

D’Elia V., et al., 2012, GCN 13494

C., [Cabrera]{} J. I., [Avila-Reese]{} V., [Ghisellini]{} G., [Ghirlanda]{} G., [Nava]{} L., [Bosnjak]{} Z., 2009, , 393, 1209

Flores H., et al., 2010, GCN 11317

Flores H., et al., 2013, GCN 14491

F., [Amati]{} L., [Guidorzi]{} C., [Landi]{} R., [in’t Zand]{} J., 2012, , 754, 138

Fynbo J. P. U., et al., 2008, GCN 8254

Fynbo J. P. U., et al., 2009, GCN 9947

N., et al., 2004, , 611, 1005

N., et al., 2005, , 437, 851

N., et al., 2008, , 689, 1161

G., [Celotti]{} A., [Ghisellini]{} G., 2002, , 393, 409

G., [Ghisellini]{} G., [Celotti]{} A., 2004, , 422, L55

G., [Ghisellini]{} G., [Firmani]{} C., 2006, New Journal of Physics, 8, 123

G., [Nava]{} L., [Ghisellini]{} G., [Celotti]{} A., [Firmani]{} C., 2009, , 496, 585

G., [Nava]{} L., [Ghisellini]{} G., 2010, , 511, A43

G., [Ghisellini]{} G., [Nava]{} L., 2011, , 418, L109

G., [Ghisellini]{} G., [Nava]{} L., [Burlon]{} D., 2011, , 410, L47

G., et al., 2012, , 422, 2553

Golenetskii S., et al., 2012, GCN 13736

D., et al., 2011, , 528, A15

D., et al., 2014, , 211, 12

S., et al., 2010, , 725, 225

S., et al., 2013, , 770, 32

J., [Bloom]{} J. S., 2012, [The Gamma-Ray Burst - Supernova Connection]{}. pp 169–190

T., [Feigelson]{} E. D., [Akritas]{} M. G., [Babu]{} G. J., 1990, , 364, 104

J. O., et al., 2010, GCN 11089

D., 2012, , 747, 146

C., [Meegan]{} C. A., [Fishman]{} G. J., [Bhat]{} N. P., [Briggs]{} M. S., [Koshut]{} T. M., [Paciesas]{} W. S., [Pendleton]{} G. N., 1993, , 413, L101

Kruehler T., et al., 2010a, GCN 14264

Kruehler T., et al., 2010b, GCN 14500

T., et al., 2011, , 534, A108

Levan A., et al., 2009, GCN 9958

Malesani D., et al., 2009, GCN 9942

R., et al., 2013, , 428, 729

P., 2006, Reports on Progress in Physics, 69, 2259

Milne P., et al., 2011, GCN 11708

E., [Piran]{} T., 2002, , 330, 920

E., [Piran]{} T., 2005, , 360, L73

F., [Ghisellini]{} G., [Ghirlanda]{} G., [Melandri]{} A., [Nava]{} L., [Burlon]{} D., 2014, arXiv:1405.3981

L., et al., 2012, , 421, 1256

L., [Ghirlanda]{} G., [Ghisellini]{} G., [Celotti]{} A., 2011a, , 415, 3153

L., [Ghirlanda]{} G., [Ghisellini]{} G., [Celotti]{} A., 2011b, , 530, A21

J. P., [Marani]{} G. F., [Bonnell]{} J. T., 2000, , 534, 248

D. A., [Modjaz]{} M., [Morgan]{} A. N., [Cenko]{} S. B., [Bloom]{} J. S., [Butler]{} N. R., [Filippenko]{} A. V., [Miller]{} A. A., 2012, , 758, 122

R., et al., 2014, Science, 343, 51

W. H., [Teukolsky]{} S. A., [Vetterling]{} W. T., [Flannery]{} B. P., 2007, [Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing (3rd edition)]{}

Prochaska J., et al., 2008, GCN 8083

Rau A., et al., 2013, GCN 15330

R., [Campana]{} S., [Vergani]{} S. D., [Covino]{} S., [D’Avanzo]{} P., [Fugazza]{} D., [Ghirlanda]{} G., [Ghisellini]{} G., [Melandri]{} A., [Nava]{} L., [Sbarufatti]{} B., [Flores]{} H., [Piranomonte]{} S., [Tagliaferri]{} G., 2012, , 749, 68

A., [Nemiroff]{} R. J., 2011, , 411, 1843

Smette A., et al., 2013, GCN 14848

Sparre M., et al., 2011, GCN 11607

Tanvir N., et al., 2010, GCN 11230

Tanvir N., et al., 2011, GCN 12225

Tanvir N., et al., 2012a, GCN 13441

Tanvir N., et al., 2012b, GCN 14009

Tello J., et al., 2012, GCN 13118

Thoene C., et al., 2008, GCN 8058

A., et al., 2014, , 211, 13

Wiersema K., et al., 2009, GCN 10263

Xu D., et al., 2009, GCN 10053

Xu D., et al., 2012, GCN 13460

Xu D., et al., 2013a, GCN 15450

Xu D., et al., 2013b, GCN 15645

D., [Murakami]{} T., [Nakamura]{} T., [Yamazaki]{} R., [Inoue]{} A. K., [Ioka]{} K., 2004, , 609, 935

F.-W., [Shao]{} L., [Yan]{} J.-Z., [Wei]{} D.-M., 2012, , 750, 88

Results of spectral analysis
============================

   [**ID**]{}  [**GRB** ]{}    [**(day frac.)**]{}  [**Redshift**]{}    [**T$_{90}$ \[s\]**]{}   [**Detectors**]{}   [**Background time sel. \[s\]**]{}    [**Redshift ref.**]{} 
  ------------ -------------- --------------------- ------------------ ------------------------ ------------------- ------------------------------------ ----------------------- --
       1       051221A                              0.5465                                                                                                                       
       2       070714B                              0.92                                                                                                                         
       3       080123                               0.495                                                                                                                        
       4       080804                  972          2.2045                      24.704              n6, n7, b1                -100:-10, 50:200                          @z080804 
       5       080810                  549          3.35                        107.46            n7, n8, nb, b1             -100:-20, 110:200                          @z080810 
       6       080916A                 406          0.689                       46.337              n7, n8, b1               -100:-20, 100:200                         @z080916A 
       7       081109                  293          0.9787                      58.369              n9, na, b1                -100:-20, 40:200                          @z081109 
       8       081121                  858          2.512                       41.985              na, nb, b1                -100:-10, 50:200                          @z081121 
       9       081221                  681          2.26                        29.697              n1, n2, b0               -100:-10, 100:200                          @z081221 
       10      081222                  204          2.77                        18.88               n0, n1, b0                -200:-10, 50:200                          @z081222 
       11      090102                  122          1.547                       26.624              na, nb, b1                -100:-20, 50:200                          @z090102 
       12      090323                  002          3.57                        135.17              n9, nb, b1               -100:-20, 200:300                          @z090323 
       13      090328                  401          0.736                       61.697              n6, n7, b1               -100:-10, 100:200                          @z090328 
       14      090424                  592          0.544                       14.144            n7, n8, nb, b1              -100:-5, 100:200                          @z090424 
       15      090510                               0.903                                                                                                                        
       16      090618                  353          0.54                        112.39                n4, b0                 -100:-20, 200:400                          @z090618 
       17      090902                  462          1.822                       19.328              n0, n1, b0                -100:-10, 60:150                          @z090902 
       18      090926A                 181          2.1062                      13.76               n6, n7, b1                -55:-10, 60:200                          @z090926A 
       19      090926B                 914          1.24                        55.553            n7, n8, nb, b1              -100:-5, 60:200                          @z090926B 
       20      090927                  422          1.37                        0.512             n2, n9, na, b1              -100:-20, 10:200                          @z090927 
       21      091003                  191          0.8969                      20.224              n3, n6, b1                -100:-10, 50:200                          @z091003 
       22      091020A                 900          1.71                        24.256              n2, n5, b0                -100:-15, 50:200                         @z091020A 
       23      091024                  372          1.092                       93.954              n7, n8, b1                -100:-10, 60:200                          @z091024 
       23      091024                  380          1.092                       93.954              n6, n9, b1           -200:-40, 60:200, 500:700                      @z091024 
       24      091127                  976          0.49                        8.701             n6, n7, n9, b1              -100:-5, 30:200                           @z091127 
       25      091208B                 410          1.063                       12.48               n9, na, b1               -100:-20, 130:250                         @z091208B 
       26      100117A                              0.92                                                                                                                         
       27      100206                  563          0.4068                      0.128               n0, n3, b0                 -100:-5, 5:200                           @z100206 
       28      100414                  097          1.368                       26.497            n7, n9, nb, b1             -100:-20, 110:200                          @z100414 
       29      100615A                 083          1.398                       37.377            n6, n7, n8, b1              -100:-5, 100:200                         @z100615A 
       30      100625A                              0.452                                                                                                                        
       31      100728A                 095          1.567                       165.38              n0, n1, b0               -100:-20, 300:500                         @z100728A 
       32      100728B                 439          2.106                       10.24             n6, n7, n8, b1              -100:-10, 10:200                         @z100728B 
       33      100814A                 160          1.44                        150.53              n7, n8, b1           -100:-20, 90:120, 200:300                     @z100814A 
       34      100906A                 576          1.727                       110.59                nb, b1                 -100:-10, 150:250                         @z100906A 
       35      101219A                              0.718                                                                                                                        
       36      110106B                 893          0.618                       35.521            n9, na, nb, b1              -100:-20, 40:200                         @z110106B 
       37      110128A                 073          2.339                       12.16             n6, n7, n9, b1              -100:-10, 10:200                         @z110128A 
       38      110213A                 220          1.46                        34.305              n3, n4, b0                -100:-10, 50:200                         @z110213A 
       39      110731A                 465          2.83                        7.485               n0, n3, b0                -100:-5, 20:200                          @z110731A 
       40      110818A                 860          3.36                        67.073            n7, n8, nb, b1              -100:-20, 50:200                         @z110818A 
       41      111117A                              1.3                                                                                                                          
       42      120119A                 170          1.728                       55.297              n9, nb, b1               -100:-20, 100:200                         @z120119A 
       43      120326A                 056          1.798                       11.776            n0, n1, n2, b0              -100:-10, 20:200                         @z120326A 
       44      120711A                 115          1.405                       44.033              n2, na, b0            -100:-20, 10:50, 150:250                     @z120711A 
       45      120712A                 571          4.1745                      22.528              n6, n7, b1                -100:-10, 30:200                         @z120712A 
       46      120716A                 712          2.486                       234.5               n9, na, b1           -100:-10, 20:160, 250:400                     @z120716A 
       47      120909A                 070          3.93                        112.07              n7, n8, b1               -100:-10, 150:300                         @z120909A 
       48      121128A                 212          2.2                         17.344              n3, n4, b0                -100:-5, 50:200                          @z121128A 
       49      130427A                 324          0.3399                      138.24              n9, na, b1                    -200:-10                             @z130427A 
       50      130518A                 580          2.488                       48.577            n3, n7, b0, b1             -100:-20, 100:200                         @z130518A 
       51      130603B                              0.356                                                                                                                        
       52      130610A                 133          2.092                       21.76               n7, n8, b1                -100:-40, 30:200                         @z130610A 
       53      131004A                 904          0.717                       1.152               n9, na, b1                -100:-5, 10:200                          @z131004A 
       54      131011A                 741          1.874                       77.057            n7, n9, nb, b1             -100:-20, 100:200                         @z131011A 
       55      131105A                 087          1.686                       112.64              n6, n7, b1               -200:-20, 150:300                         @z131105A 
       56      131108A                 862          2.4                         18.496              n0, n3, b0                -200:-10, 50:200                         @z131108A 
       57      131231A                 198          0.642                       31.232              n0, n3, b1               -100:-20, 100:200                         @z131231A 

    [**ID**]{} [**GRB**]{}              [**Analysis**]{}   [**Model**]{}   [**Alpha**]{}             [**Beta**]{}              [**$\log E_{\rm p}$ \[keV\]**]{}   [**$\log E_{\rm iso}$ \[erg\]**]{}            [**C–STAT**]{}             [**DOF**]{}        
  ------------ ------------- --------- ------------------ --------------- --------------- ----------------------------------- ---------------------------------- ------------------------------------ ----------------------------------- ------------- ----- --
                                                            (short D14)                       $ -1.08\,^{+0.13}_{-0.13} $                                           $ 2.793\,^{+0.081}_{-0.099} $       $ 51.420\,^{+0.051}_{-0.058} $                    0   
                                                            (short D14)                       $ -0.86\,^{+0.10}_{-0.10} $                                             $ 3.33\,^{+0.17}_{-0.29} $        $ 51.991\,^{+0.094}_{-0.121} $                    0   
                                                            (short D14)                       $ -1.20\,^{+0.38}_{-0.38} $                                                     $> 2.02 $                           $> 50.11 $                              0   
                               -0.6          0.361            (first)          Band           $ -0.25\,^{+0.64}_{-0.44} $                  -2.3$^a$                   $ 2.85\,^{+0.18}_{-0.12} $        $ 51.765\,^{+0.080}_{-0.069} $       408.58      362  
                              -1.024         22.528           (whole)          Band         $ -0.669\,^{+0.089}_{-0.078} $         $ -2.5\,^{+0.3}_{-1.1} $         $ 2.873\,^{+0.051}_{-0.052} $       $ 53.123\,^{+0.049}_{-0.065} $       510.38      361  
                                -1           0.305            (first)           CPL           $ -0.71\,^{+0.29}_{-0.23} $                                             $ 3.22\,^{+0.18}_{-0.13} $        $ 52.128\,^{+0.107}_{-0.093} $       501.83      482  
                              -10.24         105.47           (whole)          Band         $ -1.090\,^{+0.063}_{-0.059} $                 -2.3$^a$                 $ 3.323\,^{+0.087}_{-0.076} $       $ 53.671\,^{+0.039}_{-0.037} $        1221       482  
                               -0.2          0.307            (first)          Band           $ -0.29\,^{+0.45}_{-0.32} $                  -2.3$^a$                   $ 2.90\,^{+0.20}_{-0.16} $        $ 50.957\,^{+0.109}_{-0.099} $       377.97      361  
                              -1.024          51.2            (whole)          Band         $ -1.047\,^{+0.067}_{-0.065} $                 -2.3$^a$                 $ 2.288\,^{+0.033}_{-0.030} $       $ 52.042\,^{+0.017}_{-0.017} $       683.35      361  
                               -1.2          -0.606           (first)           CPL           $ -1.20\,^{+0.75}_{-0.49} $                                             $ 2.44\,^{+0.62}_{-0.27} $          $ 50.44\,^{+0.24}_{-0.18} $        420.97      360  
                               -5.12         34.816           (whole)           CPL           $ -1.22\,^{+0.12}_{-0.11} $                                           $ 2.529\,^{+0.088}_{-0.073} $       $ 52.148\,^{+0.043}_{-0.039} $       573.17      360  
                                0.8          1.854            (first)           CPL           $ -0.88\,^{+0.37}_{-0.28} $                                             $ 3.11\,^{+0.27}_{-0.17} $          $ 52.01\,^{+0.14}_{-0.11} $        383.75      359  
                                 0           20.48            (whole)          Band         $ -0.682\,^{+0.087}_{-0.078} $         $ -2.2\,^{+0.1}_{-0.2} $         $ 2.896\,^{+0.040}_{-0.042} $       $ 53.477\,^{+0.025}_{-0.027} $       439.43      358  
                               -0.8          0.178            (first)          Band           $ 0.92\,^{+1.17}_{-0.75} $                   -2.3$^a$                 $ 2.650\,^{+0.095}_{-0.077} $       $ 51.659\,^{+0.056}_{-0.055} $       368.91      362  
                              -1.024         75.776           (whole)          Band         $ -0.858\,^{+0.029}_{-0.027} $         $ -3.3\,^{+0.2}_{-0.2} $        $ 2.4321\,^{+0.0083}_{-0.0089} $    $ 53.6217\,^{+0.0101}_{-0.0093} $     894.98      361  
                                 0           1.131            (first)          Band           $ -0.79\,^{+0.12}_{-0.11} $                  -2.3$^a$                 $ 3.050\,^{+0.086}_{-0.077} $       $ 52.490\,^{+0.034}_{-0.033} $       421.53      361  
                              -1.024         35.84            (whole)          Band         $ -0.886\,^{+0.063}_{-0.059} $         $ -2.4\,^{+0.2}_{-0.2} $         $ 2.753\,^{+0.038}_{-0.036} $       $ 53.420\,^{+0.028}_{-0.031} $       429.81      360  
                                 0           0.764            (first)          Band           $ -0.69\,^{+0.36}_{-0.28} $                  -2.3$^a$                   $ 2.94\,^{+0.22}_{-0.15} $        $ 51.466\,^{+0.106}_{-0.086} $       372.54      359  
                              -1.792         36.096           (whole)           CPL         $ -0.966\,^{+0.022}_{-0.021} $                                          $ 3.066\,^{+0.021}_{-0.020} $       $ 53.363\,^{+0.012}_{-0.012} $       553.16      359  
                                1.4          2.771            (first)           CPL           $ -1.04\,^{+0.19}_{-0.14} $                                             $ 3.63\,^{+0.31}_{-0.26} $        $ 52.439\,^{+0.096}_{-0.129} $       372.58      360  
                              -3.072         245.76           (whole)          Band         $ -1.255\,^{+0.012}_{-0.012} $                 -2.3$^a$                 $ 3.492\,^{+0.030}_{-0.029} $       $ 54.641\,^{+0.010}_{-0.010} $       1596.9      360  
                                3.8          4.321            (first)           CPL         $ -1.009\,^{+0.102}_{-0.091} $                                            $ 3.13\,^{+0.13}_{-0.11} $        $ 51.328\,^{+0.076}_{-0.069} $       433.47      361  
                              -4.096         78.848           (whole)           CPL         $ -1.140\,^{+0.019}_{-0.019} $                                          $ 3.116\,^{+0.033}_{-0.031} $       $ 53.036\,^{+0.018}_{-0.017} $       754.48      361  
                               -0.2          0.263            (first)          Band           $ -0.90\,^{+0.20}_{-0.16} $          $ -2.6\,^{+0.3}_{-0.6} $         $ 2.136\,^{+0.062}_{-0.071} $       $ 50.724\,^{+0.064}_{-0.060} $       574.44      480  
                              -1.024         59.392           (whole)          Band         $ -1.060\,^{+0.017}_{-0.017} $         $ -2.8\,^{+0.2}_{-0.3} $         $ 2.412\,^{+0.013}_{-0.013} $       $ 52.637\,^{+0.018}_{-0.020} $       951.52      480  
                                                            (short D14)                     $ -0.820\,^{+0.020}_{-0.020} $         $ -2.8\,^{+0.3}_{-0.3} $         $ 3.908\,^{+0.031}_{-0.033} $       $ 52.871\,^{+0.018}_{-0.019} $                    0   
                               -0.8          -0.338           (first)           CPL           $ -0.29\,^{+0.66}_{-0.35} $                                             $ 3.18\,^{+0.19}_{-0.20} $          $ 50.93\,^{+0.15}_{-0.16} $        245.72      240  
                              -1.024         174.08           (whole)          Band         $ -1.166\,^{+0.013}_{-0.012} $       $ -2.51\,^{+0.05}_{-0.05} $       $ 2.3981\,^{+0.0097}_{-0.0100} $    $ 53.4013\,^{+0.0074}_{-0.0075} $     1493.4      239  
                               -0.4          0.447            (first)          Band           $ -0.29\,^{+0.17}_{-0.15} $                  -2.3$^a$                 $ 2.974\,^{+0.055}_{-0.048} $       $ 52.074\,^{+0.039}_{-0.036} $        376.4      362  
                              -1.024         55.296           (whole)          Band        $ -1.0214\,^{+0.0050}_{-0.0047} $               -2.3$^a$                $ 3.4976\,^{+0.0079}_{-0.0082} $    $ 54.5667\,^{+0.0038}_{-0.0040} $     1879.8      362  
                                 0           0.932            (first)          Band           $ -0.69\,^{+0.21}_{-0.17} $                  -2.3$^a$                   $ 2.95\,^{+0.12}_{-0.10} $        $ 52.050\,^{+0.057}_{-0.053} $       391.41      362  
                              -7.168          51.2            (whole)          Band         $ -0.821\,^{+0.010}_{-0.010} $       $ -2.49\,^{+0.06}_{-0.07} $       $ 2.9924\,^{+0.0082}_{-0.0082} $    $ 54.3125\,^{+0.0061}_{-0.0064} $     973.28      361  
                                0.6          1.272            (first)           CPL             $ 1.2\,^{+2.0}_{-1.1} $                                             $ 2.564\,^{+0.093}_{-0.073} $       $ 50.827\,^{+0.089}_{-0.092} $       527.49      482  
                              -1.024         55.296           (whole)          Band           $ 0.16\,^{+0.15}_{-0.13} $           $ -2.9\,^{+0.2}_{-0.3} $         $ 2.273\,^{+0.020}_{-0.020} $       $ 52.634\,^{+0.028}_{-0.028} $       684.57      481  
                              -0.256         0.448            (short)           CPL           $ -0.80\,^{+0.37}_{-0.30} $                                             $ 2.60\,^{+0.18}_{-0.12} $        $ 51.193\,^{+0.101}_{-0.082} $       523.39      482  
                                 0           0.569            (first)          Band         $ -1.112\,^{+0.082}_{-0.075} $                 -2.3$^a$                   $ 3.19\,^{+0.15}_{-0.12} $        $ 51.616\,^{+0.061}_{-0.054} $       382.73      362  
                              -1.024         32.768           (whole)          Band         $ -1.068\,^{+0.022}_{-0.021} $                 -2.3$^a$                 $ 2.863\,^{+0.025}_{-0.024} $      $ 53.0331\,^{+0.0092}_{-0.0090} $     501.81      362  
                               -0.2          0.613            (first)           CPL           $ -1.08\,^{+0.17}_{-0.15} $                                             $ 2.87\,^{+0.14}_{-0.11} $        $ 51.668\,^{+0.074}_{-0.065} $        381.4      362  
                              -6.144         45.056           (whole)           CPL         $ -1.386\,^{+0.072}_{-0.069} $                                            $ 2.92\,^{+0.14}_{-0.10} $        $ 52.952\,^{+0.058}_{-0.045} $       473.64      362  
                                2.4          3.028            (prec.)           CPL           $ -0.62\,^{+0.30}_{-0.25} $                                             $ 2.84\,^{+0.16}_{-0.12} $        $ 51.216\,^{+0.106}_{-0.088} $       390.51      360  
                                 5           5.628            (prec.)          Band           $ -0.80\,^{+0.86}_{-0.44} $                  -2.3$^a$                           $> 2.24 $                           $> 51.16 $                 381.46      363  
                              -16.384        430.09           (whole)           CPL         $ -1.045\,^{+0.043}_{-0.042} $                                          $ 2.737\,^{+0.040}_{-0.037} $       $ 53.222\,^{+0.022}_{-0.021} $       1134.7      363  
                               -0.2          0.247            (first)          Band           $ -0.56\,^{+0.20}_{-0.17} $        $ -2.11\,^{+0.07}_{-0.09} $        $ 2.069\,^{+0.058}_{-0.056} $       $ 51.000\,^{+0.036}_{-0.037} $       492.47      481  
                              -1.024         15.36            (whole)          Band         $ -1.252\,^{+0.067}_{-0.063} $       $ -2.21\,^{+0.02}_{-0.02} $        $ 1.706\,^{+0.018}_{-0.018} $      $ 52.2153\,^{+0.0076}_{-0.0076} $     713.48      481  
                               -0.6          0.019            (first)           CPL           $ -0.83\,^{+0.59}_{-0.43} $                                             $ 2.65\,^{+0.36}_{-0.16} $          $ 50.76\,^{+0.19}_{-0.12} $        415.97      359  
                              -1.024         66.56            (whole)          Band           $ -0.92\,^{+0.17}_{-0.17} $          $ -2.6\,^{+0.2}_{-2.5} $         $ 2.172\,^{+0.071}_{-0.050} $       $ 52.376\,^{+0.049}_{-0.077} $       837.99      358  
                                                            (short D14)                       $ -0.15\,^{+0.21}_{-0.21} $                                           $ 2.740\,^{+0.062}_{-0.073} $       $ 50.908\,^{+0.051}_{-0.057} $                    0   
                               -0.1           0.2             (short)           CPL           $ -0.42\,^{+0.17}_{-0.15} $                                           $ 2.855\,^{+0.087}_{-0.072} $       $ 50.669\,^{+0.060}_{-0.053} $       399.21      362  
                                0.4           1.11            (first)          Band           $ -0.42\,^{+0.23}_{-0.19} $                  -2.3$^a$                   $ 3.14\,^{+0.12}_{-0.10} $        $ 51.794\,^{+0.072}_{-0.064} $       461.74      479  
                              -1.024         62.464           (whole)          Band         $ -0.594\,^{+0.017}_{-0.017} $         $ -3.5\,^{+0.4}_{-0.7} $         $ 3.169\,^{+0.012}_{-0.012} $       $ 53.773\,^{+0.012}_{-0.013} $       1109.4      478  
                               -0.2          0.519            (first)           CPL           $ -0.82\,^{+0.15}_{-0.13} $                                             $ 3.17\,^{+0.16}_{-0.15} $          $ 51.65\,^{+0.11}_{-0.10} $        498.68      485  
                              -1.024         39.936           (whole)           CPL         $ -1.343\,^{+0.044}_{-0.043} $                                          $ 2.446\,^{+0.033}_{-0.030} $       $ 52.727\,^{+0.016}_{-0.015} $       783.08      485  
                                                            (short D14)                       $ -0.60\,^{+0.11}_{-0.11} $                                           $ 2.846\,^{+0.066}_{-0.078} $       $ 50.875\,^{+0.017}_{-0.018} $                    0   
                                3.6           4.37            (first)          Band           $ -0.54\,^{+0.57}_{-0.35} $                  -2.3$^a$                           $> 3.02 $                           $> 51.67 $                 381.15      362  
                              -4.096         278.53           (whole)          Band         $ -0.730\,^{+0.022}_{-0.021} $       $ -2.13\,^{+0.04}_{-0.05} $        $ 2.863\,^{+0.015}_{-0.015} $       $ 54.084\,^{+0.011}_{-0.011} $       3289.9      361  

    [**ID**]{} [**GRB**]{}             [**Model**]{}   [**Alpha**]{}   [**Beta**]{}   [**$\log E_{\rm p}$ \[keV\]**]{}   [**$\log E_{\rm iso}$ \[erg\]**]{}          [**C–STAT**]{}                      [**DOF**]{}                            
  ------------ ------------- -------- --------------- --------------- -------------- ---------------------------------- ------------------------------------ ------------------------------- ----------------------------------- -------- ----- --
                               -1.2       -0.268          (first)          Band         $ -0.84\,^{+0.35}_{-0.29} $                   -2.3$^a$                 $ 2.74\,^{+0.24}_{-0.15} $      $ 51.516\,^{+0.124}_{-0.092} $     592.61   484  
                              -1.024       7.168          (whole)          Band         $ -0.85\,^{+0.12}_{-0.12} $           $ -2.3\,^{+0.2}_{-0.4} $        $ 2.547\,^{+0.070}_{-0.052} $    $ 52.610\,^{+0.050}_{-0.068} $     561.66   483  
                               -0.6        0.132          (first)          CPL          $ -0.58\,^{+0.37}_{-0.27} $                                            $ 3.09\,^{+0.24}_{-0.19} $        $ 51.48\,^{+0.17}_{-0.14} $      393.97   359  
                              -1.152      152.45          (whole)          CPL         $ -0.536\,^{+0.100}_{-0.095} $                                         $ 2.516\,^{+0.029}_{-0.027} $    $ 52.831\,^{+0.020}_{-0.019} $     737.63   359  
                               0.2         1.018          (first)          CPL          $ -1.03\,^{+0.14}_{-0.21} $                                            $ 3.25\,^{+0.62}_{-0.17} $        $ 52.12\,^{+0.24}_{-0.10} $       262     238  
                                0         120.83          (whole)          Band        $ -1.307\,^{+0.078}_{-0.068} $       $ -2.00\,^{+0.08}_{-0.18} $                 $> 2.44 $                        $> 53.45 $               864.42   237  
                                                        (short D14)                     $ -0.22\,^{+0.27}_{-0.27} $                                           $ 2.925\,^{+0.073}_{-0.088} $    $ 51.688\,^{+0.057}_{-0.065} $               0   
                                -1        -0.515          (first)          Band         $ -0.83\,^{+0.77}_{-0.43} $                   -2.3$^a$                          $> 2.31 $                        $> 50.56 $               541.31   480  
                              -2.048      18.432          (whole)          CPL          $ -1.11\,^{+0.13}_{-0.12} $                                           $ 2.284\,^{+0.061}_{-0.052} $    $ 51.438\,^{+0.034}_{-0.032} $     538.47   480  
                               -2.2       -1.198          (first)          CPL          $ -0.61\,^{+0.66}_{-0.46} $                                            $ 2.80\,^{+0.29}_{-0.18} $        $ 51.37\,^{+0.17}_{-0.13} $      506.37   484  
                              -2.048       9.216          (whole)          CPL          $ -1.01\,^{+0.30}_{-0.25} $                                            $ 2.66\,^{+0.16}_{-0.12} $      $ 52.032\,^{+0.086}_{-0.075} $     477.39   484  
                              -3.072       35.84          (whole)          Band         $ -1.29\,^{+0.12}_{-0.11} $         $ -2.13\,^{+0.06}_{-0.08} $       $ 2.142\,^{+0.070}_{-0.058} $    $ 52.983\,^{+0.024}_{-0.025} $     471.04   360  
                               -0.8        0.349          (first)          CPL          $ -1.27\,^{+0.15}_{-0.14} $                                           $ 2.665\,^{+0.068}_{-0.058} $    $ 52.355\,^{+0.040}_{-0.037} $     400.95   360  
                              -1.024      13.312          (whole)          Band        $ -0.951\,^{+0.035}_{-0.034} $         $ -2.7\,^{+0.2}_{-0.3} $        $ 3.015\,^{+0.022}_{-0.021} $    $ 53.777\,^{+0.015}_{-0.017} $     501.5    359  
                               -0.6        0.708          (first)          Band         $ -0.79\,^{+2.76}_{-0.55} $                   -2.3$^a$                          $> 2.34 $                        $> 51.95 $               479.49   481  
                              -7.168      45.056          (whole)          CPL         $ -1.208\,^{+0.089}_{-0.084} $                                         $ 3.109\,^{+0.113}_{-0.088} $    $ 53.292\,^{+0.052}_{-0.044} $     714.43   481  
                                                        (short D14)                     $ -0.28\,^{+0.28}_{-0.28} $                                            $ 2.98\,^{+0.12}_{-0.18} $        $ 51.53\,^{+0.12}_{-0.16} $                0   
                               -0.2        0.618          (first)          CPL          $ -1.30\,^{+0.92}_{-0.25} $                                            $ 2.97\,^{+0.62}_{-0.53} $        $ 51.27\,^{+0.23}_{-0.28} $      393.34   360  
                              -2.048      57.344          (whole)          Band        $ -0.941\,^{+0.027}_{-0.025} $         $ -2.5\,^{+0.1}_{-0.2} $        $ 2.710\,^{+0.018}_{-0.019} $    $ 53.568\,^{+0.018}_{-0.018} $     834.93   359  
                                -1        -0.161          (first)          CPL          $ -1.05\,^{+0.27}_{-0.24} $                                           $ 2.379\,^{+0.102}_{-0.080} $    $ 51.301\,^{+0.062}_{-0.057} $     514.08   483  
                              -2.048      13.312          (whole)          Band         $ -0.87\,^{+0.19}_{-0.15} $           $ -2.5\,^{+0.1}_{-0.2} $        $ 2.118\,^{+0.038}_{-0.043} $    $ 52.546\,^{+0.027}_{-0.027} $     568.22   482  
                               0.2         0.921          (prec.)          CPL          $ -0.35\,^{+0.52}_{-0.38} $                                            $ 3.02\,^{+0.14}_{-0.11} $      $ 51.528\,^{+0.101}_{-0.093} $     368.65   362  
                                61        61.722          (first)          CPL          $ -0.93\,^{+0.63}_{-0.19} $                                            $ 3.45\,^{+0.25}_{-0.53} $        $ 51.72\,^{+0.14}_{-0.34} $      398.14   362  
                              -1.024      117.76          (whole)          Band        $ -0.972\,^{+0.011}_{-0.011} $         $ -3.1\,^{+0.2}_{-0.2} $        $ 3.474\,^{+0.018}_{-0.017} $   $ 54.2786\,^{+0.0079}_{-0.0079} $   666.6    361  
                               -1.4        0.152          (first)          Band         $ -1.25\,^{+0.45}_{-0.28} $                   -2.3$^a$                          $> 2.97 $                        $> 52.27 $               420.97   362  
                               -1.4         16            (whole)          Band         $ -0.62\,^{+0.20}_{-0.20} $         $ -1.88\,^{+0.09}_{-0.14} $                 $> 2.81 $                        $> 53.30 $               468.5    361  
                               -0.8        0.246          (prec.)          Band         $ -0.58\,^{+0.21}_{-0.19} $                   -2.3$^a$                $ 2.900\,^{+0.081}_{-0.068} $    $ 52.043\,^{+0.045}_{-0.042} $     376.43   361  
                               177        178.046         (first)          Band         $ -0.58\,^{+0.23}_{-0.20} $                   -2.3$^a$                $ 3.008\,^{+0.103}_{-0.086} $    $ 52.092\,^{+0.049}_{-0.046} $     403.41   361  
                               177          235           (whole)          Band        $ -1.077\,^{+0.061}_{-0.058} $         $ -2.7\,^{+0.2}_{-0.8} $        $ 2.660\,^{+0.036}_{-0.034} $    $ 53.325\,^{+0.030}_{-0.037} $     461.22   360  
                               -1.6       -0.121          (first)          CPL          $ -0.76\,^{+0.24}_{-0.19} $                                            $ 3.68\,^{+0.26}_{-0.22} $        $ 52.46\,^{+0.11}_{-0.14} $      376.75   360  
                               -1.6         130           (whole)          Band        $ -1.039\,^{+0.063}_{-0.059} $         $ -2.2\,^{+0.1}_{-0.2} $        $ 2.941\,^{+0.049}_{-0.045} $    $ 53.818\,^{+0.029}_{-0.031} $     1086.8   359  
                                2          2.96           (first)          Band         $ -0.43\,^{+0.21}_{-0.19} $                   -2.3$^a$                $ 2.596\,^{+0.054}_{-0.047} $    $ 52.099\,^{+0.028}_{-0.027} $     366.13   360  
                               -0.6         28            (whole)          Band        $ -0.892\,^{+0.116}_{-0.095} $         $ -2.6\,^{+0.1}_{-0.2} $        $ 2.315\,^{+0.028}_{-0.033} $    $ 53.123\,^{+0.024}_{-0.024} $     491.99   359  
                                0          0.402          (first)          Band        $ -0.399\,^{+0.026}_{-0.025} $         $ -3.5\,^{+0.3}_{-0.4} $        $ 3.060\,^{+0.015}_{-0.015} $    $ 51.817\,^{+0.011}_{-0.012} $     405.5    359  
                                13        14.046          (first)          Band         $ -0.74\,^{+0.25}_{-0.23} $                   -2.3$^a$                $ 2.854\,^{+0.118}_{-0.084} $    $ 51.972\,^{+0.051}_{-0.046} $     481.17   481  
                                0           75            (whole)          Band        $ -0.925\,^{+0.015}_{-0.014} $       $ -2.35\,^{+0.06}_{-0.07} $       $ 3.167\,^{+0.015}_{-0.015} $   $ 54.2712\,^{+0.0055}_{-0.0056} $   1128.5   480  
                                                        (short D14)                     $ -0.73\,^{+0.15}_{-0.15} $                                           $ 2.952\,^{+0.061}_{-0.071} $    $ 51.326\,^{+0.045}_{-0.050} $               0   
                               1.8         2.728          (first)          CPL          $ -0.50\,^{+0.46}_{-0.36} $                                            $ 2.78\,^{+0.14}_{-0.10} $      $ 51.541\,^{+0.090}_{-0.080} $     340.54   360  
                               1.8          20            (whole)          CPL          $ -0.83\,^{+0.11}_{-0.11} $                                           $ 2.716\,^{+0.046}_{-0.042} $    $ 52.619\,^{+0.029}_{-0.027} $     467.98   360  
                               -0.8         0.4           (short)          Band         $ -0.50\,^{+2.10}_{-0.63} $                   -2.3$^a$                          $> 1.71 $                        $> 51.13 $               368.42   360  
                               -0.4        0.462          (first)          CPL          $ -0.71\,^{+0.30}_{-0.22} $                                            $ 3.39\,^{+0.26}_{-0.21} $        $ 51.86\,^{+0.15}_{-0.15} $      475.15   480  
                               -0.4         80            (whole)          Band        $ -0.997\,^{+0.168}_{-0.085} $         $ -2.0\,^{+0.2}_{-0.3} $                  $> 2.66 $                        $> 53.17 $               939.17   479  
                               -0.4        0.406          (first)          CPL          $ -0.81\,^{+0.30}_{-0.24} $                                            $ 3.03\,^{+0.23}_{-0.15} $        $ 51.47\,^{+0.14}_{-0.11} $      383.21   362  
                               -0.4         120           (whole)          CPL         $ -1.295\,^{+0.029}_{-0.028} $                                         $ 2.795\,^{+0.036}_{-0.033} $    $ 53.280\,^{+0.017}_{-0.016} $     704.34   362  
                               0.2         1.22           (first)          Band        $ -0.549\,^{+0.101}_{-0.090} $         $ -2.1\,^{+0.1}_{-0.1} $        $ 2.933\,^{+0.049}_{-0.050} $    $ 52.872\,^{+0.022}_{-0.024} $     366.2    361  
                               0.2          22            (whole)          Band        $ -0.867\,^{+0.030}_{-0.029} $         $ -2.4\,^{+0.1}_{-0.2} $        $ 3.048\,^{+0.025}_{-0.024} $    $ 53.799\,^{+0.013}_{-0.014} $     458.83   361  
                               1.8         2.293          (first)          CPL         $ -0.046\,^{+0.839}_{-0.580} $                                         $ 2.418\,^{+0.128}_{-0.091} $    $ 50.256\,^{+0.093}_{-0.086} $     403.2    360  
                               1.8          70            (whole)          Band        $ -1.208\,^{+0.011}_{-0.010} $       $ -2.33\,^{+0.04}_{-0.05} $       $ 2.453\,^{+0.011}_{-0.011} $   $ 53.3352\,^{+0.0082}_{-0.0086} $   1261.2   359  

Comparsion with Gruber et al. (2014) results {#cmp-g14}
============================================

In this section we compare the results of our [*short*]{} and [ *whole*]{} analysis to those of @2014-Gruber-GBMCat-4yr, for the bursts present in both samples. In Fig. \[fig-cmpg14\] we compare the values of the low energy spectral index `alpha` (upper panel), the observed $\nu F_{\nu}$ peak energy (middle panel) and the fluence estimated in the 10 keV–1 MeV (observer frame) energy range (lower panel).

The large discrepancies found in the `alpha` parameter for GRB 080810 (ID 5) and in the observed peak energy GRB 091208B (ID 25) are likely related to the very high background contamination. The discrepancy in fluence for GRB 080916A (ID 6) is due to the different value of the `beta` parameter used in @2014-Gruber-GBMCat-4yr. Also this burst is significantly background dominated.

![image](cmp_alpha){width=".6\textwidth"}\
![image](cmp_ep){width=".6\textwidth"}\
![image](cmp_flnc){width=".6\textwidth"}

\[lastpage\]

[^1]: E-mail: [giorgio.calderone@gmail.com]{}

[^2]: <http://fermi.gsfc.nasa.gov/ssc/data/access/gbm/llt_settings.html>

[^3]: Bursts with $T_{90} < 2$ s and a either a Band or cutoff power law best fitting model in the @2014-Gruber-GBMCat-4yr catalog: 70 GRB.

[^4]: <http://fermi.gsfc.nasa.gov/ssc/data/analysis/GBM_caveats.html>

[^5]: Time binned count spectra with time resolution of 1.024 s from the burst trigger time $T_0$ to $T_0$+600 s, and time resolution of 4.096 s for a few thousands seconds before and after the burst.

[^6]: The list of all recorded counts with time and channel tags (Time Tagged Events). Data are available from $\sim T_0 - 25$ s to $\sim T_0 +
      300$ s.

[^7]: The `XSPEC` implementation of this spectral model is available <http://www.giorgiocalderone.url.ph/xspec_ggrb.tar.gz>.

[^8]: The correlation analysis for the [*first*]{} results are the same in both the $E_{\rm p}$–$E_{\rm iso}$ and $E_{\rm p}$–$L_{\rm iso}$ planes, since the rest frame time interval is the same for all GRBs: 0.3 seconds.
