    In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                           No. 14-484V
                                     Filed: February 13, 2015
                                        Not for Publication


*************************************
BRANDY HUMPHRIES,                             *
                                              *
              Petitioner,                     *
                                              *
                                              *  Damages decision based on stipulation;
v.                                            *  tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap)
                                              *  vaccine; Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                           *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                           *
                                              *
              Respondent.                     *
                                              *
*************************************
John R. Howie, Jr., Dallas, TX, for petitioner.
Darryl R. Wishard, Washington, DC, for respondent.


MILLMAN, Special Master

                              DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

         On February 13, 2015, the parties filed the attached stipulation in which they agreed to
settle this case and described the settlement terms. Petitioner alleges that she suffered
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) that was caused by her June 9, 2011, receipt of
tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine. Petitioner further alleges that she
suffered the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Respondent denies that the
Tdap vaccine either caused or significantly aggravated petitioner’s GBS or any other injury, and

1
  Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this
case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal
Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899,
2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made
available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is
privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and
move to delete such information prior to the document’s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,
agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall
delete such material from public access.
further denies that petitioner experienced symptoms of GBS or any other injury for more than six
months. Nonetheless, the parties agreed to resolve this matter informally.

        The undersigned finds the terms of the stipulation to be reasonable. The court hereby
adopts the parties’ said stipulation, attached hereto, and awards compensation in the amount and
on the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the stipulation, the court awards:

    a. a lump sum of $120,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner; and

    b. a lump sum of $7,238.36, representing compensation for reimbursement of a Medicaid
       lien, in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and the Colorado Department of
       Health Care Policy and Financing, ID #G922628. Petitioner agrees to endorse this
       payment to the Medicaid provider.

These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C.
§ 300aa-15(a).

        In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the
court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2


IT IS SO ORDERED.


Dated: February 13, 2015                                                           s/ Laura D. Millman
                                                                                      Laura D. Millman
                                                                                       Special Master




2
  Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or
jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
                                                    2
