Are we ready for my teacher?
Right who?
Do I not someone I actually studied with I wouldn't quite call it that and quite study with it
But just we we shared a space and we communicated a couple of insanely beautiful times
Right. So I mentioned in one of our talks and what we call the Dharma circle we talked about he would come at like 10:00
at night and
But 3:00 in the morning when the last people were there. That's when he would say it right so we're not doing
We're not doing performance
We're not looking for likes. We're not in a
facebook monetized app we got to go inside the source code now and actually find our way and we're gonna
We're gonna find our way to literally a new world
Okay
Literally a new world. Okay. So we end we end. Okay good. So totally with you ready to go. Here we go
so
a little bit slow
Alright, I wanna go a little bit slow because I want to try and kind of capture this and try and capture it deeply okay
so
our topic
Cheers Cheers. Cheers, Cheers Lahaina
Well, I am cheers salud
salud salud
We raise our glasses wants to raise a glass
Let's raise our glass if you got some wine time to break out some wine. Get some wine pour a drink
Let's raise our glasses who's raising their glass. That's raise my coffee club raising my glass salud
salud
Yes, yes. Here we go. Okay
So we're gonna go kind of kind of crazy deep here and we're gonna I want to try and break something open
Okay, and I was boxing with my friend Daniel on this this morning and Zach and I were talking about it last week
I don't like all the way. Okay cappuccino. I know
Cappuccino give that man they know a kiss, okay
Here we go
so
We're gonna get in the end to conspiracy theories into false flags
so I'm gonna say a couple of words about that to start but then I want to go we got to go deeper in to
Know what's happening on how to hold this and that's that's our job and sense-making
That's the job right one church many paths one mountain and our sister right independent movements
But but sisters to us the Center for integral wisdom the foundation for conscious evolution
Barbara we're ready to go and the office for the future. Okay the office for the future and
If I can if I can't I want to just I want to just ask you for a second
To be with me right right. This is the sense making process we're about to do or it is an expression of
the office for the future
The feature is a term coined by
my beloved evolutionary partner Barbara Marx Auburn and about two or three weeks were actually opening for the first time a
web presence for the office for the future
so
What is the office of the future I want to just meditate this with you for a second?
So I'm gonna turn off my video. I just want to be with you in voice for a second. Okay?
What is the office for the future?
the office for the future originally named by my evolutionary partner Barbara Marx Hubbard the
office for the future
understands that sense-making is essential
And that sense-making is
the way we can imagine into the new future and
that every crisis at its core is a
crisis of intimacy and a crisis of
imagination
To heal the crisis of intimacy
we need to reimagine new intimacy's but new intimacy's in the sense of an intimate universe new intimacy's and
economies new intimacy's in politics new intimacy's and relationships new intimacy's and
organizational structures new intimacy's and national budgets
and
we're in this moment of
transformation
We're very much like the caterpillar
The caterpillar that's desperate to turn into a butterfly
And when the caterpillar nears its
Transformation time it begins to eat ravenously right consuming
Alright, does that sound familiar? That's how we identify ourselves these days right as
consumers
Let's meditate this together friends and as you listen here this not as information in the surface sense
But the in formation the very formation of reality
We've defined ourselves as consumers we
Take in we take in we take in we try and cover up the emptiness the
Caterpillar body which is the body politic, which is our body becomes heavy
obesity
Explodes in the world we outgrow our skin many times
The caterpillar outgrows its skin until it's too bloated to to move. It's too bloated to even move
Then the caterpillar attaches to a branch
But it's upside down the caterpillar is because like this moment everything's turned on its head
The caterpillar forms a chrysalis the chrysalis is an enclosing shell
The caterpillars freedom is limited like the lockdown of kovat 19
And the caterpillar is unlocked down for the duration of the transformation
but within the chrysalis at a biological
phenomena of a radical amazement
That can only be held in rapt attention
Holding something in rapt attention is what it means a miracle a miracle means Murari to hold and rapt attention
So open your heart with me, if you can't open your mind open your biological scientific mind
literally in
the caterpillar
tiny cells would biologists write tiny cells what biologists actually call imaginal cells begin to appear and
these cells are wholly different from
the earlier
structure of the caterpillar the earlier
caterpillar cells and
these new cells carry new codes
We might call them evolutionary love codes and the language of them our society today right these new codes. They carry different
Information, right? They literally resonate to a different frequency
These new codes. These imaginal cells are holding a memory of the future
It's the frequency of the emergence
that will come from the emergency and
at first course the caterpillars in the in system right perceives these new cells as enemies and
They're attacked
Why are you talking about the second shock of existence? Why are you talking about crisis?
Let's just be happy right the Prophet is always killed and we all need to be prophets together
We all need to be seers together. We all need to be sacred futurists together
We all need to realize and sense make beyond the status quo
so in the caterpillar the immune system perceives these new cells and experiences them as enemies and attacks them just like
new structures just
like new narratives in
science and medicine and politics new narratives of identity new matters of social behavior
are denounced or ignored or
considered fringe by the mainstream
But the imaginal cells and we are the imaginal cells friends, but the imaginal cells in the caterpillar. They don't look away
They're not deterred
They continued to appear in greater number and every person listening right now is an imaginal cell
The imaginal cells continue to appear in even greater numbers
Recognizing each other bonding right allured together we come together. It's why you're listening. It's why we're hearing each other
Until the new cells the imaginal cells are numerous enough to self-organize into a new configuration of intimacy
Into a new structure into a new human and a new humanity
When enough cells in the caterpillar have formed to make structures along the new organizational lines
The old immune system of the caterpillar is overwhelmed
The caterpillar body becomes opener a nutritious soup
which grows the butterfly and then the butterfly begins to go as the imaginal cells talk to each other and
reimagine reality and
The crisis imagination is healed and transformed until the butterfly is ready to explode
And when it's ready the chrysalis becomes transparent
The lockdown is over. The need for restriction has been outgrown and
freedom emerges and a butterfly
explodes
We are together here we are the office for the future and we're articulating a
memory of
the future
Friends we are
And that was just a meditation to take us in right
What we want to do here today is articulate this memory of the future
and we want to talk about
Information and conspiracy theories and false flags and we can't talk about it
Independently you ready we can't talk about it independently
of
The intimate universe you can't even begin to approach conspiracy theory and how we hold them
Independently of the enemy universe. Okay, so let's dive in so here's a statement one
I'm just gonna go through a bunch of statements and I'm gonna I'm gonna
Have I don't know I probably have a hundred pages of notes that I took through the night that are strewn
Right across this desk. So just gonna go slow and gentle right no performance. We're hanging out together. Is that good?
Are we together we loving each other? Okay
I'll 411 to you poor 11 to me and from that space in between we're gonna find each other
Okay, like total intimacy between us we're loving we're all and we're all holding hands. All right, we're over together
So one statement one
Right anyone who believes every conspiracy theory is true is a fool
But anyone who believes there's absolutely nothing to conspiracy theories is a bigger fool, okay?
The mistake Spira see theories
Even the best ones is they take partial truths
Partial incites and they turn them into whole insights
And you have to know how to read and listen deeply
So you're listening to a conspiracy theory? And you recognize fact what in fact to Factory? Oh, that's right. That's right. That's right
We talked last week right the 5g
Conspiracy theory. All right articulated by mr. It and I'm delighted to do a public dialogue with you at any time
But let's get this straight you make some really good points, but then you make leaps you're not telling people you're making leaps
Yes, we haven't tested 5g technology. It's not sufficiently tested. That's true
The 5g communications technology and it's also true that 4G technology
hasn't been sufficiently tested and it's also true that the corona outbreaks don't map as
You claimed they did on to the places
Right where 5g technology is that it's strongest. They actually don't map. That's actually not true. The maps are filled with holes
number three number four
ID from the correct intuition
That 5g technology is not properly vetted
We add neither was 4G neither was 3g and we've got a fundamental problem in testing around the world
Right. We actually don't do longitude own testing. We do short-term testing and
Short-term testing is insufficient what we often do as my brother
Daniel says in short-term testing is we look at a particular biometric
We see if a particular drug effects that biometric, right?
And if it does we say it's forwards trials then we release it, but we don't look at we ignore other biometrics
we ignore other variables so we actually cherry-pick and
The reason we cherry pick and there's at least 50 authors who have talked about this and written about this and in terms of sense
Making it's unbelievably important
The reason we cherry pick is because even our science right is driven by return on investment
Our science is funded
Our science is almost never today pure science
right most science today is return on investment and it's funded and
Scientists have careers and scientists have budgets and they're in a win-lose metrics with other scientists
All the time the win-lose metrics right literally penetrate
Science and to speak outside of the dogmas of science will cause you great loss, right?
It's a big deal. So often right we think oh that science
Well, well, whoa stand back is it pure science?
It's the same way that we used to think that religion was pure religion in the 13th century
Right, but it wasn't actually we now realize right as deconstruction has shown us right cherry-pick Robin cherry-pick cherry-pick ones
We pick parts of information part of a data set and we don't share the rest of the data set, right?
We isolate and see how a particular drug for example
Effects one on by the way. I'm answering a question in the chat box everyone
We sell a particular data a particular drug affects a particular biometrics
We cherry-pick right that particular, but we don't check launched
Long-term right what the other effects are that's called cherry-picking you got that Rob Rob cannon. You got that
Okay, let's go back to word words. Someone tell me where we work. Right anyone who asks a question
You're responsible for telling me where we were where were we anybody where be someone gonna tell me who's listening? Okay, where are we?
Is anyone gonna tell me you guys gonna leave me just standing here not remembering the exact. That's the problem, right?
Right who's gonna tell me who's gonna tell me now. Come on who's gonna tell me where were we was anyone listening?
Okay
Right. We're in science right in science. What were we saying? About science 5g Thank you Thank You Enoch and now good Peter
We're good. So five cheap. Thank you. Thank you what I'm gonna probably do friends time
We're trying to run through
if you have a question in the chat box that can answer as we go ask it but then you have
Responsibility to tell me the thread. Okay. Does that work? Okay. Thank you and everyone right? Awesome Jerry. Thank you
Okay, so you've got to beware of you got to be aware of taking a partial truth
So the partial truth is that 5g has not been sufficiently tested
The partial truth is that we are electrical systems or electrical systems and our actual communication takes place
Electrically we are electricity literally so it makes perfect sense. We can resonate with that but actually 5g
But which is an electrical interference pattern as it were right might actually affect us in a long-term
That makes a lot of sense we resonate with that and there's lots of information to validate that has ever got that
But that doesn't mean that there's no coronavirus under the corona virus is merely a function
Of the five gene effect. It's natural biological
Material natural genetic material and there is no virus. That's not true. You got that Jackie. That's not true
That's critical. There is a virus and it's actually a violation of intimacy to claim. There's not a virus
Okay, and we're gonna talk about what that means right bad sense making right?
Irresponsible sense making it's not just a detail everyone get this. It's not a detail, but it's a violation of the intimate universe
Okay
the Hebrew word for
And anyone who wants to take some notes and take them in the chat box with us so we can track any ones to write
Things Zohar Claire shot deep right? Anyone who's in all right, Christina love I don't who's in that right? Fantastic
Okay
there is a virus right bad sense making is a
Violation and it wants to write let's write so what kind of will be in the chat box. We'll be talking together
We'll have this double conversation. Okay, right
It's a violation of intimacy wait
Because here's here's a word remember Seinfeld who in Europe watched Seinfeld our European friends or African friends or Asian friends Seinfeld
famous American television show so there was a phrase on it yada yada yada and
Yada, yada yada means I know I know I know yada yada yada which comes actually from the Hebrew word why a da?
Someone grabbed that in the chat box. Why a da ya da
Comes from the book of Genesis chapter 4 verse 1 we have scripture on this
Okay
And yet that means to be erotically intimate carnal knowledge in
The classical sense of intimate relations not the wider sense of intimacy that we use it but one of its expressions
Which is intimate relations. So yeah, that means intimate relations
Carnal knowledge and your da means to cognitively no
Same thing I'm gonna get how beautiful that is language as victims time correctly pointed out to us in the school of positivism
language
Discloses reality. Okay, so to know is to know cognitively
Right, there's epistemic intimacy. That makes sense everyone. There's cognitive intimacy
So sense-making right is not this arrogant act. There's always an arrogant sense and
around sense making there's this sense of an
My brother Dee, right we were in boxing this morning. You talked about this when I shared with him this Yoda idea. All right
he talked about that the arrogance he left me a lakhs bhakti the arrogance that often exists and sense making work since making itself is
Weaponized it's a separate self win-lose metrics does everyone get that?
Right, I weaponize sense making sense making is a tool of the intimate universe
But all tools can be weaponized someone get that everything
That is a that's a tool
right a spear right a long stick can take something down from a tree in the prehistoric time that also becomes a sharpened spear and
Every whether it's CRISPR or whether it's AI all tools can be weaponized
and it's so sense making as a tool and it can be weaponized and
actually weaponized sense making right as part of the separate self win-lose metrics and there's this arrogant fight that
That that takes place and erupts and we just get involved in another win lose metrics. No, right sense-making
What's the best way to say this right sense-making is it self?
sense-making is itself an
Expression of intimacy right epistemic epistemic is knowing and that's why the word for knowing in the word
For intimacy are the same
Wow
Cognitive intimacy, right? And so therefore
Intimacy functions all the way up and all the way down
We're gonna talk more about intimacy in a couple of minutes
But just for now right when I'm arguing with you over sense-making ready
All right. So sense-making is I'm it's sensual sense is sensual
it's the same in English just like yadda in Hebrew is knowing cognitive and
carnal knowledge
Erotic knowledge. So an English sense is sensual. It's the same
He catch that it's it's a universal language pattern and universal language patterns always disclose the nature of reality the nature of the universe
So since making essential right and I want to love the moment open
Right if I'd said dramatically I want to fuck the moment open right but but I add fucking because there's a fierceness
there's a quivering tenderness and there's a fierceness to sense-making but it's always about communication and
Communication is always about communion
Then we get that so if you see sense making happening on the web, which is conspiracy theory
But it's weaponized
Then it's not
Actually sense making sense making essential it can be fierce just like sensuality can it can be quivering lis tender
But it's always got a leak to communion made sense making is an act of making love with reality
Making love with the universe and making love with each other
You can't talk about sense making independent of the intimate universe
You can't do sense making if you're not making love you can't do sense making if you're not
Moving right in a form of what? Hey, bro mas called the highest communication modes
You got to move the highest communication modes have to actually open you into communion intimate communion
It's got to create community, which is communion. That's the communion
This is the communion of pioneering Souls Barbara's phrase
Right and it's a unique self symphony
Which is a communion which were doing sense making together and sense making isn't weaponized against each other since making is a sacred
tool of Homo habilis of the human being who is
made a tool maker and
homo amour
transcends and includes Homo habilis and homo more to be home more more
I do sense making as an expression of the enemy universe. I create trust I
Sense making shared sense making creates trust and I begin to realize that there's a shared
Sensual story and that which unites us is greater than that which divides us
right, and so
So when I do sense making I actually have to engage in intimate action. I have to be intimate with the universe
I'm going to talk about that in a couple of seconds
I don't to put that aside for a second, but also I've got to be intimate with you
So, what's the spiritual?
Practice of sense making I have to begin to realize that one perspective doesn't hold reality
Particularly, I've got to be willing to bracket the sense that my one perspective holds reality
Right, and I would trust mr. X
Much better if I would actually feel in him the trembling of uncertainty, right?
No shaming no attack. And again, I'm up to talk to you in public for more private at anytime work
I just think you're wrong. I mean dead wrong and dissing forming reality in a number of levels. So I gotta be fierce here
Okay, but let's just feel this together lots of your facts that are wrong and the leaps you make in your conclusion
Right, which you don't share with your listener. You actually draw people in through
Pieces partial truths that are actually seductive and often correct, but then you make a leap and draw conclusions
But your listener doesn't actually track where the leap is. That's not okay you
With me instead. Okay, we're talking this together
Okay, and then right give us some uncertainty right when you talks you talk like a fundamentalist
Radical certainty can my brother my little brother who's beautiful beautiful man
Who's now past the next world he died in a car accident five years ago was killed instantly and I loved him madly
Alright, and I gotta be fierce here. My brother was a fundamentalist
right, I grew up originally as in a fundamentalist world and
Fundamentalists don't know uncertainty it got radical certainty
all right, so I reject the radical certainty of people who say oh
I believe the news you shouldn't believe the news the news is often information warfare
The news is often narrative warfare. The news is driven by ratings, which is a profit metrics, right?
It's driven by entertainment metrics. It's owned by
For-profit corporations that have quarterly reports the news is not reliable tragically the news is often disinformation
Okay, I got that right. So anyone who's got this kind of mainstream certainty a at the news
That's that's what's right, Oh conspiracy theories
Those are crazy people that radical certainty bracket that radical certainty at the same time
Anyone who says Wow
I believe all the conspiracy theories and people who are actually arguing for the conspiracy theories who don't share the leaps they're making and
Who never have uncertainty?
and I listened right to an entire write very carefully right word for word because someone in our circle asked me to
Write to two people send it to me
Great
Right. It was originally sent to me by Christina right menus, right?
And then later, I got it from Kristen then I got it from other people and I listened to this
One particular conspiracy there and then two three others and and that the paradox but Mr
X is paradigmatic here right is there was no uncertainty
so whenever you don't have and here's a litmus test for sense making
Whenever there's not a dance between certainty and uncertainty
Beware buyer beware that's a form of fundamentalism
so the spiritual practice of sense making
requires
Bracketing your perspective and becoming intimate with the other person and actually taking their perspective
That's part of intimacy
Okay intimacy means I'm gonna bracket my perspective
I'm gonna step out of my unique self which is and I'm part of the field of enema. See that's true self
I'm part of the field of intimacy and desire and consciousness. That's true self. Then I'm a unique quality of enema scene
I'm a unique perspective that's unique self then to join unique self Symphony
Which is to do sense making I step out of my unique self and I feel you
Right. So one of the definitions of intimacy is remember
Right is and I'm gonna I'm gonna give you the definition
Alright, then we're gonna apply it to perspective taking and keep writing in the chatbox because that's gonna help me hold my thread
So I totally appreciate that. Okay, because there's we're doing so much here
Okay, here's a definition of intimacy that we're going to come back to
intimacy equals
Anyone who's up for writing? This would be awesome intimacy equals
Shared identity
Enema see shared identity in
the context of
Relative other nests and the word relative is in brackets. So in Emma C equals shared identity in
the context of relative other nests and relative is in brackets and
This is literally just like Einsteins equals MC squared changed physics. This is and I say this with trembling
Humility and complete audacity because I take on this I know this is true
You've spent decades on this so intimacy equals shared identity in the context of relative other Ness plus plus sign
plus mutuality of recognition
Plus
mutuality of pathos
Plus mutuality of purpose. So if someone's to be brave and put that all into one chat
We can actually see it together and I think we got it. We got it. Okay. Fantastic
Rock my world. Okay. So now let's let's apply that so you understand
You can't talk about conspiracy theories, right? You can't evolve the source code
We can't write generate the emergence out of this emergency without Dharma Dharma is the new emergence. It's the new source code
That's what did Vince she does in the Renaissance. I mean as the Black Plague the bubonic plague
Sweeps through Europe and he can't heal everyone. He tells a news story. He engages in sense-making which is the universe being da Vinci
So we are DaVinci together in this moment and we are in this focused zoom. We're in Florence right now
We're in Florence though around the world. Okay, we ready you ready guys. Are we good? Are we good? So, okay
So dark, Dharma makes us write the new narrative the accurate narrative
Which is a a bring it together of the best facts and to the highest new order of information
Dharma is the bringing together of the best fact into the highest new configuration of information
Which is what sense making is Dharma makes us intimate with ourselves and intimate with the universe
Okay
We're gonna come back to that sense if we can grab that Dharma makes us intimate with ourselves and intimate with the universe
Let's get back to that. I want to go back to perspective taking let's take a step at a time. So
so
intimacy's right intimacy shared identity
Right in the context of other news
We don't merge or we have shared identity, right but we're not merged together. We have independence
There's both allurement and autonomy right think subatomic particles that come together into an atom
Right. So the subatomic particles still exist
There's not fusion but there's Union they've created a shared identity called an atom
So intimacy is structural to reality the nature of reality is the intimate universe and the trajectory of reality
Right, which we've talked about at length
And I'm ecstatic to share that Barb and I are about to publish a book in the next two weeks
Working on it with Kirsten and with the but vain Owen was Zack called the intimate universe, right?
Why a new story is the best response to existential risk the most necessary response. Okay. So let's just feel this together. Okay, so
Enema C equals shared identity in the context of a relative other Ness, right?
So the subatomic particles don't disappear, but there's an atom there's a new shared identity
the actus subatomic particles recognize each other
Right. Actually, there are systemic ly aware of each other and they feel each other, right?
There's but out for North white had called prehension, which is allurement
There's this proto desire to touch
There's this feeling of the subatomic particles and then they create that sweet reality of pathos
Then they create mutuality of purpose meaning they function together as an atom. Okay, so now let's focus on mutuality of pathos together
Okay, so mutuality of pathos means here's what it means mutuality of pathos means I feel you and you feel me
Yet that mutuality of pathos means it's part of the definition of intimacy
Structural all the way up and all the way down the evolutionary chain. It means I feel you and you feel me then
There's a second loop. I feel you feeling me
right
You feel me feeling you?
Then there's a third loop right? I feel you feeling me feeling in
You feel me?
Feeling you feeling me you get that and it's ad infinitum
Right, but this is different than Elbe. This is different than let's say Ramadan Maharshi. I am I am aware now
I'm aware that I'm aware that I'm aware that I'm aware that I'm aware
That's kind of the meditators game to take the I am and then to expand and expand it right aware of aware of aware
Which is beautiful in terms of true self
It's a beautiful meditation. But actually you got to go to unique self on me unique quality of intimacy and
It at the same time unique quality of enema see but we all share we're all in the same field
So we're all part of the same seamless come to the universe. We have shared identity
Right, and we have an enormous amount in common
And part of what we share in common is also our uniqueness
right
And so I then don't get stuck in my uniqueness
I actually use my uniqueness as a current of intimacy uniqueness is the currency of Eros, right?
I use my uniqueness to plug into you imagine right a an electric cord and a unique plug at the end
Which is my unique self which plugs into you and into your outlet
Right in this erotic image and I can then access and feel you
Right that's called perspective taking but perspective taking is not just cognitive
it's an act of the post emic intimacy a
Perspective taking as an act of cognitive intimacy. I'm feeling you right you're feeling me. We're being intimate together
right, so
Sense making together is sensual, but it's a central erotic act of lovemaking
right
Right. It's not the sexual and the sex was a model for a larger arrows for a larger intimacy, right?
It's intimacy all the way up and all the way down
So if you see people which is happening all over the web now these brutal groups attacking
Right arguing weaponizing sense making weaponizing information. Whoa
Whoa, that's not sense making that's the separate self. That's turns a tool into a weapon
Right and is engaged right in?
warfare
We're fair
right and
Warfare has many forms. There's many ways. We move to kill each other to make a killing in the market right in these win-lose games
Right, but that's not that's not we want to be doing that's not that's not home more and more. That's the old Homo Sapien
that's the weaponizing of information does everyone get that like, oh my god, so
So we need to do sense making right in this very new and very beautiful way
Okay, does everyone get this so far? Who's who's with us so far? We just lay down an entire
framework
General gather who just who got that, right?
It's like wow, right and it's one of the ways you can recognize right right what we're - listen
We're to pay attention right in and we're not to pay attention
Okay, so let me just go once one more step. Then we're gonna kinda get we're gonna dive in deeper
We're literally we're just were just we'll we haven't even started. We're gonna get to some depths here. Okay? Yeah
Well, we ready we okay to get to some depth. Can we go at the opposite, right?
We feel each other we're holding hands. Okay, we're in. Okay, so it's gonna be just two examples
Just maybe three just just to get it. We're holding hands just super quick. Okay, but it's gorgeous
Okay, so we got our definition of intimacy, right and someone can copy and paste it. That'd be awesome
Just so we'll see it in front of us
Okay
We'll see it in front of us intimacy equals who can grab that and put it in the chat box intimacy equals shared identity
Perfect shared identity in the context of relative other nests Plus mutuality of recognition plus neutrality of purpose plus neutrality of pathos
Okay, so now let's just that works. We saw one example
Subatomic particles and an atom. Okay. Here's just a second example
second example would be
You know nations in the world
My nemesis shared identity and all the nations the world are made up of human beings that's world centric in a machine
Right, but we don't want to
Obliterate nations, there's room for a healthy ethnocentric sense right for the individuated nations
Actually healthy nation states that actually are living in a shared identity, which every nation state is a unique self does everyone get this?
We're now reconfiguring politics through the new narratives
We don't want just a global government, right? That actually is an open door to totalitarianism
We need a kind of global federation, but we need individuated strong nation-states
So we need shared identity in the context of relative other nests where we have mutual out of recognition
But we also have any tality of pathos. We can actually feel each other, right?
All right, and we have them can absolute reality of purpose. We can have shared purpose
So that's how intimacy would work in the political equation right in a couple?
Right and a couple I actually have to be not just contractually separate selves in romantic love right was a very particular
configuration, which is often a strategy for the ego of mind now we have to be expressions unique expressions about Rangers Club or a couple
We have to have shared identity where mr. And mrs. Smith MS. And mr. Smith, right? You have shared identity
We recognize each other but not fused right its shared identity in the context of relative other Ness
We have mutuality of pathos. We feel each other we have we shouted purpose
We're not just role mates in soulmates. Where in our language were ho mates
Ho mates means we're not just looking deeply in each other's eyes that soulmates. We're not just functioning together. That's row mates
We're actually an evolutionary relationship. That's ho mates were looking at a shared vision together
Okay, that's that's mutuality of purpose. That's gorgeous. Right? Right. Let's look at another example, just one more example self
Self what's two more examples self, right, so I contain multitudes?
At Walt Whitman, I contain multitudes. So I need to be intimate with myself
Which means I need to have shared identity
With all the parts of myself and the second I'm non intimate with myself
I split off parts of myself that I can't access. I can't be intimate with you
so I've got to be intimate with my protector and with my broken child and with my seeking mind right and with my
Innocent right and with my my shadow self and with my split off anger and envy and rage
Right, right whenever I split off parts of myself, and I don't actually contain multitudes Whitman's phrase
I don't have shared identity in the context of relevance. Meaning I have distinct voices
But they're all part of me and there's mutual out of recognition
None of the voices. Hijack me there, right?
There's mutuality of pathos the voices recognize each other the voices feel each other
Then the voices create shared purpose. Let's everyone get how this is an e equals mc-squared
It's the inner physics of cosmos we've looked at in terms of atoms
We've looked at in terms of Nations - we've looked at it in terms of a couple three. We've looked at in terms of
self for
Let's look at it, you know two more examples in terms of a company an organization
Company has a bunch of divisions
Right those divisions have to have shared identity at companies anyone who's an organizational consultant
Right companies break down because all companies and all agencies and all intelligence agencies
Right in all larger write larger organizations different factions fight with each other
There's a win-lose metrics and they lose the sense of shared identity, which is like Peter Drucker
Organizational consultant said culture eats strategy for breakfast, but Drucker didn't have a way to create a culture
So that's to be intimacy a company needs to be intimate
You need an intimate culture of shared identity and a context the relative other Necedah vision is independent. There's mutuality of recognition
We recognize each other each division feels each other
Then the divisions can operate with a mutuality of purpose and Peter sengai
Mike from MIT tells a great story at the beginning of his book
Presence about how a company which was making a new product. I
Actually was complete and overruns destroying its budget falling apart until they created. He doesn't use this language, right?
He didn't hasn't have this nobody. He's describing there create a sense of shared identity
Right, you tree out of recognition mutuality of purpose mutuality right of pathos
They're actually able to complete the project, you know, 75 days early
I don't remember the precise number right an organization and finally
Here's the last one number six this we get this is real then we're gonna go to information
We're gonna go to conspiracy theory number six seconds number six. Okay, you're six
Okay, here's 6 so 6 is sexing
Right. So the first five were eros no sexing what happens in sexing and sexing there is shared identity
We become part of a larger pulsing throbbing moving ecstatic open, right entity
We've become a larger one
Right. We see each other with God's eyes and we participate in the same fabric of existence and loneliness abates for a moment as
Merged together in the Oh God of the larger one
But the still the context of relative other Nisour to the same field, but we don't lose our distinct uniqueness
So we can actually cry out in the moment of exaltation the name of other because there's mutuality of recognition and we feel each other
But the separation is has broken down right giving is receiving and receiving is giving and in the rest of the world view
they're giving or you're taking
Right, you're giving or you're receiving and sexing that breaks down because their shared identity
Right, right. There's shared identity. There's neutrality of recognition. We call each other's name. We scream each other's name
we scream the name of God in each other's
And we realized that each other's name is part of the name of God, and then we scream
Yes
Because we're part of the entire field and the Big Bang is exploding in this particular flaring forth in this moment
And from there we can be ho mates. We can have neutrality purpose that's unique self sexing and that's an right this new work
we're doing the phenomenology of
Arras, which I'm doing with Christina and Gabrielle
I didn't Barbara Marx Hubbard is deeply in this with us and two of the big volumes
Right we talk about this thing called unique self sexing which is what we just described which is the intimacy incarnate and sexing
She's ever to see what we just did. We just did six frames
Okay, six complete frames. And the reason we took time to do these six frames because you get this is
We're not this is a big deal. This is the structure of reality
