
Spanish: 
Es una participación maravillosa y lo que yo
me gusta hacer es hablar por alrededor de 7
en punto a las 8 en punto con un rápido
presentación que nos gustaría hacer
una media hora de preguntas a partir de
así que prepárate para esos yy
créeme si no tienes suficiente
preguntas voy a seguir adelante solo
obtén lo que me gustaría hablar contigo un
un poco acerca de esta noche es, por supuesto,
La evidencia para Dios desde lo contemporáneo.
Física y sobre todo contemporánea.
cosmología por lo que vamos a pasar la
la mayor parte del tiempo en él, pero ya sabes
Sólo mirando alrededor sabes la
La prensa popular hoy muchos de ustedes.
Saber de qué llamaría misnomers
La iglesia católica y sobre la religión.
de la clase de ustedes saben que se ha extendido sobre
y pensé que podría hablar una
poco sólo para empezar con una
Unos segundos sobre algunas de las figuras.

English: 
It's a wonderful turnout and what I'd
like to do is speak for about between 7
o'clock to 8 o'clock with a quick
presentation we would like to get about
a half hour worth of questions to from
you so get ready for those and and
believe me if you don't have enough
questions I'll just keep on going just
get what I'd like to talk to you a
little bit about tonight is of course
the evidence for God from contemporary
physics and especially contemporary
cosmology so we're going to spend the
lion's share of time on it but you know
just sort of looking around you know the
the popular press today a lot of you
know what I would call misnomers about
the Catholic Church and about religion
of kind of you know been spread about
and I just thought I might just talk a
little bit just to start off with for a
few seconds about some of the figures

French: 
C’est un taux de participation merveilleux et ce que j’aurais
aime faire est de parler d'environ 7
heures à 8 heures avec un rapide
présentation que nous aimerions avoir à propos de
une demi-heure de questions à partir de
vous êtes donc prêt pour ceux-ci et et
crois moi si tu n'en as pas assez
des questions que je vais juste continuer juste
obtenir ce que je voudrais vous parler un
peu de ce soir est bien sûr
l'évidence de Dieu du contemporain
la physique et surtout contemporaine
la cosmologie, donc nous allons passer la
la part du lion de temps sur elle mais vous savez
juste en quelque sorte en regardant autour de vous connaissez le
la presse populaire aujourd'hui beaucoup d'entre vous
sais ce que j'appellerais des malentendus à propos de
l'Église catholique et la religion
de genre de vous savez été répandu à propos de
et je pensais juste que je pourrais juste parler un
un peu juste pour commencer avec un
quelques secondes sur quelques chiffres

Vietnamese: 
Đó là một kết quả tuyệt vời và những gì tôi muốn
muốn làm là nói khoảng 7
một cách nhanh chóng đến 8 giờ
trình bày chúng tôi muốn có được về
một nửa câu hỏi đáng giá từ
bạn đã sẵn sàng cho những điều đó và
hãy tin tôi nếu bạn không có đủ
câu hỏi tôi sẽ tiếp tục đi
có được những gì tôi muốn nói với bạn
tất nhiên một chút về tối nay là tất nhiên
bằng chứng cho Chúa từ đương đại
vật lý và đặc biệt là đương đại
vũ trụ học vì vậy chúng ta sẽ dành
sư tử chia sẻ thời gian trên đó nhưng bạn biết đấy
Chỉ cần nhìn xung quanh bạn biết
báo chí phổ biến ngày nay rất nhiều bạn
biết những gì tôi sẽ gọi sai từ ngữ về
Giáo hội Công giáo và về tôn giáo
của loại bạn biết được lan truyền về
và tôi chỉ nghĩ rằng tôi có thể nói chuyện
một chút chỉ để bắt đầu với một
vài giây về một số số liệu

Spanish: 
Figuras católicas sacerdotes católicos como una
De hecho, los clérigos católicos que
han estado involucrados en la ciencia desde su
inicio sólo para dar una idea que sabes
que sabes lo que se ha dicho sabes
tal vez sobre Giordano Bruno por cierto
Giordano Bruno no fue juzgado debido a
todo lo que dijo sobre la ciencia era un
hereje y para otros niveles bastante
genuinamente y por lo tanto para todos los efectos y
propósitos que no tienen nada que ver con
La ciencia si miras sabes con
algunas de estas personas aquí en el en el
puntos de poder verás a Nicholas
Copérnico mucha gente ha pensado.
que la iglesia persiguió a galileo
porque Galileo creía en el
Universo heliocéntrico que no era el
Razón para ello la persona que primero.
ideado y matemáticamente aprobado el

English: 
Catholic figures Catholic priests as a
matter of fact Catholic clerics that
have been involved in science from its
inception just to give an idea you know
that you know what's been said you know
maybe about Giordano Bruno by the way
Giordano Bruno was not tried because of
anything he said about science he was a
heretic and for other levels quite
genuinely and so for all intents and
purposes it had nothing to do with
science if you look at you know with
some of these folks here on the on the
powerpoints you'll see Nicholas
Copernicus a lot of people have thought
that the church persecuted Galileo
because Galileo believed in the
heliocentric universe that wasn't the
reason for it the person who first
devised and mathematically approved the

French: 
Figures catholiques prêtres catholiques en tant que
En fait, les clercs catholiques
ont été impliqués dans la science depuis son
création juste pour donner une idée que vous connaissez
que vous savez ce qui a été dit, vous savez
peut-être à propos de Giordano Bruno en passant
Giordano Bruno n'a pas été jugé à cause de
tout ce qu'il a dit de la science, il était un
hérétique et pour les autres niveaux assez
véritablement et donc pour toutes les intentions et
fins il n'a rien à voir avec
la science si vous regardez vous savez avec
certains de ces gens ici sur le
powerpoints vous verrez Nicholas
Copernicus beaucoup de gens ont pensé
que l'église a persécuté Galilée
parce que Galilée croyait en la
univers héliocentrique qui n'était pas le
raison pour laquelle la première personne
conçu et approuvé mathématiquement la

Vietnamese: 
Công giáo linh mục Công giáo như một
vấn đề thực tế giáo sĩ Công giáo rằng
đã tham gia vào khoa học từ nó
khởi đầu chỉ để đưa ra một ý tưởng mà bạn biết
rằng bạn biết những gì bạn đã nói bạn biết
có lẽ về Giordano Bruno
Giordano Bruno đã không được cố gắng vì
bất cứ điều gì ông nói về khoa học, ông là một
dị giáo và cho các cấp độ khác
thực sự và như vậy cho tất cả các ý định và
mục đích của nó không liên quan gì
khoa học nếu bạn nhìn vào bạn biết với
một số trong những người ở đây trên
powerpoint bạn sẽ thấy Nicholas
Copernicus rất nhiều người đã nghĩ
rằng nhà thờ đã đàn áp Galileo
bởi vì Galileo tin vào
vũ trụ nhật tâm không phải là
lý do cho nó là người đầu tiên
nghĩ ra và toán học đã được phê duyệt

French: 
possibilité d'un univers héliocentrique
était Nicolas Copernic comme vous le savez probablement
savoir et il était un clerc catholique, il était
même un avocat canon au sein du catholique
Eglise qui a eu cette merveilleuse habitude de
mathématiques et et en astronomie
et bien sûr est venu avec le premier
version de l'univers héliocentrique de
la façon dont la controverse Galileo n'était pas
à propos de l'univers héliocentrique ou sur
la science elle-même comme nous le verrons dans un instant
Je vraiment ce dont il s'agissait était tu sais
le pape avait demandé à Galilée de
s'abstenir de publier sa théorie sa
la théorie héliocentrique comme un fait avant
il y avait suffisamment de preuves pour réellement
montrer que maintenant, mais deux cents ans
plus tard, il y avait la preuve de fait
montrer que l'héliocentrisme était correct et
c'était avec une technique appelée stellaire
parallaxe mais jusqu'à ce point vraiment
il n'y avait pas assez de preuves et quoi

Spanish: 
posibilidad de un universo heliocéntrico
fue Nicholas Copernicus como usted probablemente
Sabía y era un clérigo católico que era
Incluso un abogado canónico dentro de la católica.
Iglesia que tenía este maravilloso hábito de
Matemáticas y en astronomía.
y por supuesto se me ocurrió la primera
Versión del universo heliocéntrico por.
La forma en que la controversia de Galileo no fue
sobre el universo heliocéntrico o sobre
La ciencia misma como veremos en un momento.
Realmente de lo que se trató fue usted sabe
El Papa le había pedido a Galileo que
abstenerse de publicar su teoría su
La teoría heliocéntrica como un hecho anterior.
había suficiente evidencia para en realidad
Demuestra que ahora, pero doscientos años.
Más tarde hubo la evidencia para en realidad
Mostrar que el heliocentrismo era correcto y
Eso fue con una técnica llamada estelar.
paralaje pero hasta ese punto realmente
no habia suficiente evidencia y que

Vietnamese: 
khả năng của một vũ trụ nhật tâm
là Nicholas Copernicus như bạn có lẽ
biết và ông là một giáo sĩ Công giáo
thậm chí là một luật sư canon trong Công giáo
Nhà thờ có thói quen tuyệt vời này
toán học và trong thiên văn học
và tất nhiên đã đưa ra đầu tiên
phiên bản của vũ trụ nhật tâm bởi
cách mà cuộc tranh cãi Galileo không phải là
về vũ trụ nhật tâm hay về
khoa học như chúng ta sẽ thấy trong giây lát
Tôi thực sự những gì nó là về bạn biết
Giáo hoàng đã yêu cầu Galileo
kiềm chế xuất bản lý thuyết của mình
lý thuyết nhật tâm như một thực tế trước đây
có đủ bằng chứng để thực sự
cho thấy bây giờ nhưng hai trăm năm
sau đó có bằng chứng thực sự
cho thấy thuyết nhật tâm đã đúng và
đó là với một kỹ thuật gọi là sao
thị sai nhưng đến thời điểm đó thực sự
không có đủ bằng chứng và những gì

English: 
possibility of a heliocentric universe
was Nicholas Copernicus as you probably
know and he was a Catholic cleric he was
even a canon lawyer within the Catholic
Church who had this wonderful habit of
mathematics and and in astronomy
and of course came up with the first
version of the heliocentric universe by
the way the Galileo controversy was not
about the heliocentric universe or about
science itself as we'll see in a moment
I really what it was about was you know
the the Pope had asked Galileo to
refrain from publishing his theory his
heliocentric theory as a fact before
there was enough evidence to actually
show that now but two hundred years
later there was the evidence to actually
show that heliocentrism was correct and
that was with a technique called stellar
parallax but up to that point really
there wasn't enough evidence and what

French: 
Galilée est allé de l'avant et a fait et par la
manière que les jésuites à la romaine
Collège se lie d'amitié avec Galilée, ils pensaient
il était formidable et en fait le
mathématiciens du jésuite
mathématiciens au collège romain
effectivement aidé Galileo à prouver son
théorie héliocentrique mais quand il
appelé le pape un imbécile dans son livre vous
connaître sur les deux nouveaux systèmes les jésuites
genre de allé whoa obtenir genre de
radical ici et ils retirent un
peu et bien sûr, vous savez qu'il a fait
publier comme un fait après qu'il a promis
le pape qu'il ne serait pas et le reste
comme on dit est l'histoire mais il n'a pas été
à propos de l'église étant antithétique ou
contre la science n'a rien à voir avec
que du tout nous pouvons voir un deuxième chiffre
ici aussi assez bien connu Gregor Mendel
pardon oh je suis désolé
Gregor Mendel et Gregor Mendel comme vous

Vietnamese: 
Galileo đã đi trước và làm và bởi
cách mà các tu sĩ dòng Tên tại La Mã
Đại học kết bạn với Galileo họ nghĩ
anh ấy rất to lớn và thực tế là
nhà toán học của dòng Tên
nhà toán học tại Đại học La Mã
thực sự đã giúp Galileo chứng minh
thuyết nhật tâm tuy nhiên khi anh
gọi Giáo hoàng là một kẻ ngốc trong cuốn sách của mình, bạn
biết trên hai hệ thống mới Dòng Tên
loại đã đi whoa nhận được loại
triệt để ở đây và vì vậy họ kéo trở lại một
một chút và tất nhiên bạn biết anh ấy đã làm
công bố nó như một sự thật sau khi ông hứa
Giáo hoàng mà ông sẽ không và phần còn lại
như họ nói là lịch sử nhưng không phải
về nhà thờ bị phản đối hoặc
chống lại khoa học không có gì để làm
rằng tất cả chúng ta có thể thấy một hình thứ hai
ở đây cũng khá nổi tiếng gregor mendel
xin lỗi, tôi xin lỗi
Gregor Mendel và Gregor Mendel như bạn

Spanish: 
Galileo se adelantó e hizo y por la
camino que los jesuitas en la romana
Colegio se hizo amigo de Galileo, pensaron
Fue tremendo y de hecho el
matemáticos de los jesuitas
matemáticos en el colegio romano
En realidad ayudó a Galileo a demostrar su
Sin embargo, la teoría heliocéntrica cuando
llamó al Papa un tonto en su libro que
Sabemos sobre los dos nuevos sistemas de los jesuitas.
tipo de fue whoa obteniendo tipo de
Aquí radicales y por lo que retiran una
poco y por supuesto sabes que lo hizo
publicarlo como un hecho despues de lo prometido
El papa que no quiso y el resto.
como dicen es historia pero no fue
acerca de que la iglesia es antitética o
contra la ciencia no tiene nada que ver con
En todo eso podemos ver una segunda figura.
Aquí también es bastante conocido gregor mendel
perdon oh lo siento
Gregor Mendel y Gregor Mendel como tú

English: 
Galileo went ahead and did and by the
way that the Jesuits at the Roman
College befriended Galileo they thought
he was tremendous and in fact the
mathematicians of the Jesuit
mathematicians at the Roman College
actually helped Galileo to prove his
heliocentric theory however when he
called the Pope a fool in his book you
know on the two new systems the Jesuits
kind of went whoa getting kind of
radical here and so they pull back a
little bit and of course you know he did
publish it as a fact after he promised
the Pope that he wouldn't and the rest
as they say is history but it wasn't
about the church being antithetical or
against science had nothing to do with
that at all we can see a second figure
here also quite well known gregor mendel
pardon oh I'm sorry
Gregor Mendel and Gregor Mendel as you

French: 
savoir était le père de contemporain
la génétique quantitative, il était non seulement un
Moine augustin il était l'abbé de son
monastère et donc bien sûr tourné
dans un demi-laboratoire parce qu'il était
Abbé nous avons aussi une autre figure
là vous savez qui est la tête de
contemporain de la stratigraphie et ce qui est
appelé Geo moderne
élégie et bien sûr des fossiles et c'est
Nicholas Steno qui était non seulement un prêtre
il était évêque et il était évêque
au Danemark un évêque catholique au Danemark
le chiffre final que vous verrez est le père
George Lemaitre et et père George
Lemaitre était belge de prêtre il était un
guerre mondiale un héros est parti étudier à
MIT et aussi à Stanford a obtenu son

Spanish: 
Sabía que era el padre de la contemporánea.
Genética cuantitativa no solo fue un
Monje agustino era el abad de su
monasterio y así, por supuesto, lo convirtió
en un medio laboratorio porque estaba
Abad también tenemos otra figura arriba.
ahí sabes quién es el jefe de
contemporáneo de la estratigrafia y lo que es
llamado Geo moderno
Elegía y por supuesto fósiles y eso es
Nicolás Steno que no era solo un sacerdote.
fue obispo y obispo en
en Dinamarca un obispo católico en Dinamarca
la última figura que verás es padre
George Lemaitre y su padre George
Lemaitre fue belga de sacerdote fue un
un héroe de la guerra mundial se fue a estudiar a
MIT y también en Stanford consiguió su

English: 
know was the father of of contemporary
quantitative genetics he was not only an
Augustinian monk he was the abbot of his
monastery and so of course turned it
into a half laboratory because he was
Abbot we also have another figure up
there you know who is the the head of
contemporary of stratigraphy and what's
called modern Geo
elegy and of course fossils and that's
Nicholas steno who was not only a priest
he was a bishop and he was a bishop in
in Denmark a Catholic bishop in Denmark
the final figure you'll see is father
George Lemaitre and and father George
Lemaitre was Belgian of priest he was a
world war one hero went off to study at
MIT and also at Stanford got his

Vietnamese: 
biết là cha đẻ của đương đại
di truyền định lượng, ông không chỉ là một
Nhà sư Augustinian, ông là trụ trì của mình
tu viện và vì vậy tất nhiên biến nó
vào một phòng thí nghiệm nửa vì anh ấy
Trụ trì chúng tôi cũng có một con số khác
ở đó bạn biết ai là người đứng đầu
đương đại của địa tầng và những gì
gọi là Geo hiện đại
thanh lịch và tất nhiên hóa thạch và đó
Nicholas steno, người không chỉ là linh mục
ông là một giám mục và ông là một giám mục
ở Đan Mạch một giám mục Công giáo ở Đan Mạch
con số cuối cùng bạn sẽ thấy là cha
George Lemaitre và cha George
Lemaitre là người Bỉ của linh mục, ông là một
anh hùng chiến tranh thế giới đã đi học
MIT và cũng tại Stanford có

French: 
doctorat en cosmologie physique est devenu un
collègue d'Einstein et Lemaitre est
responsable de la plus complète
théorie cosmologique et le plus
rigoureusement vérifié cosmologique
la théorie aujourd'hui appelée la Big Bang Theory
et il a découvert qu'en 1927, trois
ans plus tard, il a été vérifié par Edwin
Hubble le très célèbre américain
astronome là-bas au mont Wilson et
bien encore le reste est l'histoire
mais George Lemaitre a appelé la théorie à
cette fois, vous connaissez la théorie de la
oeuf cosmique et plus tard, il l'a appelé le
atome cosmique, il n'a pas été appelé le grand
la théorie de bang qui a été nommé par Fred Hoyle
qui essayait de jeter des dispersions sur
il a dit oh oui cette théorie de oui
Comment allons-nous l'appeler le Big Bang et
bien sûr que cela était censé être un imbécile

Vietnamese: 
tiến sĩ vũ trụ học vật lý đã trở thành một
đồng nghiệp của Einstein và Lemaitre là
chịu trách nhiệm toàn diện nhất
lý thuyết vũ trụ và nhất
kiểm tra chặt chẽ một vũ trụ
lý thuyết ngày nay gọi là Lý thuyết Big Bang
và ông đã phát hiện ra rằng vào năm 1927
năm sau nó đã được xác minh bởi Edwin
Hubble người Mỹ rất nổi tiếng
nhà thiên văn học ở Núi Wilson và
một lần nữa phần còn lại là lịch sử
nhưng George Lemaitre đã gọi lý thuyết này tại
thời gian đó bạn biết lý thuyết về
trứng vũ trụ và sau này ông gọi nó là
nguyên tử vũ trụ nó không được gọi là lớn
lý thuyết bang được đặt tên bởi Fred Hoyle
người đã cố gắng phân tán
nó nói ồ đúng là lý thuyết
chúng ta sẽ gọi nó là Big Bang và
tất nhiên đó là một trò hề

Spanish: 
doctorado en cosmología física se convirtió en una
colega de Einstein y Lemaitre es
Responsable de lo más completo.
Teoria cosmologica y lo mas
rigurosamente verificado un cosmológico.
La teoría de hoy se llama la teoría del Big Bang
Y descubrió que en 1927 tres.
Años después fue verificada por Edwin.
Hubble el muy famoso americano
astrónomo allí en el Monte Wilson y
bueno otra vez el resto es historia
pero George Lemaitre llamó a la teoría en
Esa vez conoces la teoría de la
huevo cósmico y más tarde lo llamó el
átomo cósmico no fue llamado el gran
la teoría de la explosión que fue nombrada por Fred Hoyle
quien estaba tratando de lanzar dispersiones sobre
él dijo oh sí esa teoría del sí
¿Cómo lo llamamos el Big Bang y
por supuesto que se suponía que era un desaire

English: 
doctorate in physical cosmology became a
colleague of Einstein's and Lemaitre is
responsible for the most comprehensive
cosmological theory and the most
rigorously verified a cosmological
theory today called the Big Bang Theory
and he discovered that in 1927 three
years later it was verified by Edwin
Hubble the very famous American
astronomer there at Mount Wilson and
well again the rest is history
but George Lemaitre called the theory at
that time you know the theory of the
cosmic egg and later on he called it the
cosmic atom it wasn't called the big
bang theory that was named by Fred Hoyle
who was trying to cast dispersions upon
it he said oh yes that theory of yes
what shall we call it the Big Bang and
of course that was supposed to be a snub

French: 
mais bien sûr, il a plus tard regretté que
nous verrons plus tard dans le
conférence parce qu'il a si bien prouvé
mais en tout cas pas l'Eglise catholique
n'a pas été contre la science beaucoup de ses
les prêtres ont été à la pointe de
la science et bien sûr aujourd'hui encore
voir
Lemaitre Walker espace-temps Lemaitre
constantes possibilités de Lemaitre LeMay
Treme astuces il matrices etc etc donc
George Lemaitre est un bon prêtre belge
est au centre de la science, nous avons un
Académie Pontificale des Sciences
et est rempli de prix nobel
nous les jésuites à coup sûr, vous savez
un observatoire là-bas à Tucson
Arizona juste à côté du Kitt Peak
Observatoire de l'Université de l'Arizona
et bien sûr aussi nous le personnel du la
observatoire au Chili et bien sûr
vous pouvez aller sur n'importe lequel de ces sites et

Vietnamese: 
nhưng tất nhiên sau đó anh hối hận vì
chúng ta sẽ thấy sau này trong
bài giảng bởi vì nó đã được chứng minh rất tốt
nhưng trong mọi trường hợp không có Giáo hội Công giáo
đã không chống lại khoa học nhiều
các linh mục đã đi đầu trong
khoa học và tất nhiên ngày nay bạn vẫn
xem
Lemaitre Walker không gian Lemaitre
khả năng Lemaitre không đổi LeMay
Thủ thuật treme nó ma trận, v.v.
George Lemaitre một linh mục người Bỉ tốt là
là trung tâm của khoa học, chúng tôi có một
Học viện Khoa học Giáo hoàng
và chứa đầy những người chiến thắng giải thưởng cao quý
Chúng tôi, Dòng Tên chắc chắn có một bạn biết
một đài quan sát ở dưới đó ở Tucson
Arizona ngay bên cạnh đỉnh Kitt
Đài quan sát Đại học Arizona
và tất nhiên chúng tôi cũng nhân viên
đài quan sát ở Chile và tất nhiên
bạn có thể vào bất kỳ trang web nào trong số này và

English: 
but of course he later regretted that as
we shall see later on in the in the
lecture because it got so well proven
but in any case no the Catholic Church
has not been against science many of its
priests have been in the forefront of
science and of course today you still
see
Lemaitre Walker space-time Lemaitre
constant Lemaitre possibilities LeMay
Treme tricks it matrices etc etc so
George Lemaitre a good Belgian priest is
is at the center of science we have a
Pontifical Academy of Sciences
and is filled with nobel prize winners
we the Jesuits for sure have a you know
an observatory down there in Tucson
Arizona right next to the Kitt Peak
Observatory the University of Arizona
and of course also we staff the the
observatory down in Chile and of course
you can go to any of these websites and

Spanish: 
pero, por supuesto, más tarde lamentó que como
Veremos más adelante en el en el
Conferencia porque se puso muy bien probado
Pero en cualquier caso no la Iglesia Católica.
No ha estado en contra de la ciencia muchos de sus
Los sacerdotes han estado en la vanguardia de
la ciencia y, por supuesto, todavía hoy
ver
Lemaitre Walker espacio-tiempo Lemaitre
Lemaitre constante posibilidades LeMay
Trucos trucos, matrices, etc, etc.
George Lemaitre un buen sacerdote belga es
está en el centro de la ciencia tenemos una
Academia pontificia de las ciencias
y está lleno de los ganadores de los premios Nobel.
Nosotros, los jesuitas, seguro que tenemos una
un observatorio allá abajo en Tucson
Arizona justo al lado del pico Kitt
Observatorio de la Universidad de Arizona
y, por supuesto, también el personal del
observatorio en Chile y por supuesto
Usted puede ir a cualquiera de estos sitios web y

French: 
il y a l'église debout debout
il à la pointe de la science si
il est un peu regrettable que nous sommes
obtenir tout cela, je dirais très faux
appuyez en ce moment et je vraiment c'est
imméritée mais tu sais que je vais descendre de mon
train en marche et arriver à la aller à la
point
que peut faire l'église et que peut-on
la science fait et ce que la science ne peut pas faire pour
partants j'ai eu un débat avec Stephen
Hawking de retour sur le Larry King
montrer avec son collègue Leonard
Mladenov et quelques Henty Pak Chopra qui
homme merveilleux mais en tout
tout au long du débat, vous connaissez le la
la question de savoir si ou non la science pourrait
dire réellement si l'univers avait besoin
un créateur ou pourrait dire définitivement que
la science ne pouvait pas ne pas besoin d'un créateur
cela faisait partie du débat qui a été soulevé
et nous parlerons du néant

Vietnamese: 
Có Giáo hội Công giáo đang đứng
luôn đi đầu trong khoa học
thật đáng tiếc rằng chúng ta
nhận được tất cả điều này tôi sẽ nói rất sai
nhấn ngay bây giờ và tôi thực sự nó
không quan tâm nhưng bạn biết tôi sẽ thoát khỏi
bandwagon và nhận được để có được
điểm
Hội thánh có thể làm gì và có thể làm gì?
khoa học làm gì và khoa học không thể làm gì
Người mới bắt đầu Tôi đã có một cuộc tranh luận với Stephen
Hawking một thời gian trở lại trên King King
thể hiện cùng với đồng nghiệp Leonard
Mladenov và một vài Henty Pak Chopra
người đàn ông tuyệt vời nhưng trong tất cả của nó
trong suốt cuộc tranh luận bạn biết
vấn đề có hay không khoa học có thể
thực sự nói liệu vũ trụ có cần không
một người sáng tạo hoặc có thể nói dứt khoát rằng
khoa học không thể không cần một người sáng tạo
đó là một phần của cuộc tranh luận đã đưa ra
và chúng ta sẽ nói về hư vô

English: 
there's the Catholic Church standing
there at the forefront of science so
it's kind of regrettable that we're
getting all this I would say very false
press right now and I really it's
undeserved but you know I'll get off my
bandwagon and get to the get to the
point
what can the church do and what can
science do and what can't science do for
starters I had a debate with Stephen
Hawking a while back on the Larry King
show along with his colleague Leonard
Mladenov and a few Henty Pak Chopra that
wonderful man but in all of it
throughout the debate you know the the
matter of whether or not science could
actually say whether the universe needed
a creator or could say definitively that
science couldn't doesn't need a creator
that was part of the debate that came up
and we'll be talking about nothingness

Spanish: 
está la iglesia católica de pie
allí a la vanguardia de la ciencia por lo
es un poco lamentable que estemos
consiguiendo todo esto diría muy falso
presiono en este momento y realmente es
inmerecido pero sabes que voy a salir de mi
carro y llegar a la llegar a la
punto
¿Qué puede hacer la iglesia y qué puede hacer?
La ciencia hace y lo que la ciencia no puede hacer por
entrantes tuve un debate con Stephen
Hawking hace un tiempo en el rey de Larry
mostrar junto a su colega Leonard
Mladenov y algunos Henty Pak Chopra que
hombre maravilloso pero en todo eso
a lo largo del debate ya sabes el
cuestión de si la ciencia podría o no
en realidad decir si el universo necesitaba
Un creador o podría decir definitivamente que
La ciencia no podía, no necesitaba un creador.
Eso fue parte del debate que surgió.
Y estaremos hablando de la nada.

Vietnamese: 
trong một phút quan điểm mặc dù tất cả
đây chỉ là ba nguyên tắc ngắn gọn mà
bạn có biết chúng tôi phải thành lập từ
khoa học số một bắt đầu không thể
từ chối Chúa tôi không quan tâm bất cứ ai
nói với bạn tôi không quan tâm nếu họ có
Tiến sĩ khoa học không thể bác bỏ Thiên Chúa tại sao
bởi vì bằng chứng khoa học phải
dựa trên các phép đo quan sát
là những dữ liệu có thể quan sát được
phản xạ so sánh và giả thuyết
những điều suy diễn mà về cơ bản là
có thể quan sát có thể quan sát bây giờ
đây là vấn đề thiết yếu của Chúa
ngoài vũ trụ
bằng chứng quan sát là trong
vũ trụ bạn không thể sử dụng quan sát

French: 
dans une minute le point si de tous
c'est juste trois brefs principes
savez-vous que nous devons établir à partir de
la science numéro un début ne peut pas
réfuter Dieu, je ne me soucie pas de ce que quelqu'un
vous dit que je ne me soucie pas s'ils ont un
PhD science ne peut pas réfuter Dieu pourquoi est
parce que les preuves scientifiques doivent être
sur la base de mesures d'observation qui
sont des données observables qui sont observables
réflexe comparatif et hypothétique
choses déductives qui sont essentiellement
observable observable observable maintenant
voici le problème essentiel que Dieu est
hors de l'univers
la preuve d'observation est dans le
univers, vous ne pouvez pas utiliser l'observation

Spanish: 
en un minuto el punto a pesar de todo
esto es sólo tres breves principios que
¿Sabes que tenemos que establecer desde
El principio número uno de la ciencia no puede
refutar a Dios no me importa lo que nadie
te dice que no me importa si tienen una
La ciencia de doctorado no puede refutar a Dios por qué es
eso porque la evidencia científica debe ser
basado en mediciones de observación que
Son datos observables los cuales son observables.
Reflejo comparativo e hipotético.
cosas deductivas que son esencialmente
observable observable observable ahora
Aquí está el problema esencial que es Dios.
fuera del universo
evidencia observacional está dentro de la
universo que no puedes usar observacional

English: 
in a minute the point though of all of
this is just three brief principles that
are you know we have to establish from
the beginning number one science cannot
disprove God I don't care what anybody
tells you I don't care if they have a
PhD science cannot disprove God why is
that because scientific evidence must be
based on observation measurements which
are observable data which is observable
comparative reflex and hypothetical
deductive things which are essentially
observable observable observable now
here is the essential problem God is
outside the universe
observational evidence is within the
universe you cannot use observational

Vietnamese: 
dữ liệu từ trong vũ trụ tới
từ chối một Thiên Chúa ở ngoài
vũ trụ vượt vũ trụ
hoàn toàn không thể bạn không thể sử dụng dữ liệu
từ trong phim hoạt hình để từ chối
vẽ tranh biếm họa không thể đó là
điều thứ nhất thứ hai Stephen Hawking
trong cuộc tranh luận bạn biết tôi rằng
một cuộc tranh cãi mà chúng ta biết ngày nay chúng ta
có lý thuyết dây hoặc bây giờ cái gọi là
m-theory cấu hình 11 chiều
của chuỗi nhưng điều quan trọng là như chúng ta
bây giờ biết rằng ông nói rằng vũ trụ
không cần một người sáng tạo, chúng tôi không
biết bất cứ điều gì thuộc loại
Tại sao lại như vậy bởi vì khoa học không chỉ

French: 
les données de l'univers à
réfuter un Dieu qui est en dehors de la
univers transcendant l'univers, il est
absolument impossible, vous ne pouvez pas utiliser les données
à partir de la bande dessinée pour réfuter la
dessinateur, il est impossible que ce soit la
première chose deuxième chose Stephen Hawking
pendant le débat, vous me connaissez
une affirmation que nous connaissons bien aujourd'hui, nous
avoir la théorie des cordes ou maintenant ce qu'on appelle
m-théorie 11 configurations dimensionnelles
des chaînes, mais l'essentiel est que nous
sais maintenant qu'il a dit que l'univers ne
pas besoin d'un créateur non nous ne nous faisons pas
savoir quelque chose du genre
pourquoi est-ce parce que la science est non seulement

English: 
data from within the universe to
disprove a God who is outside the
universe transcending the universe it's
absolutely impossible you can't use data
from within the cartoon to disprove the
cartoonist it's impossible that's the
first thing second thing Stephen Hawking
during the debate you know me that that
one contention well we know today we now
have string theory or now what's called
m-theory 11 dimensional configurations
of strings but the key thing is as we
now know he said that the universe does
not need a creator no we don't we don't
know anything of the kind
why is that because science is not only

Spanish: 
datos desde dentro del universo para
refutar a un Dios que está fuera de la
universo trascendiendo el universo es
absolutamente imposible no puedes usar datos
desde dentro de la caricatura para refutar el
dibujante es imposible que esa es la
Lo primero, lo segundo, Stephen Hawking.
Durante el debate me sabes que eso
una afirmación bien sabemos hoy que ahora
tener la teoría de cuerdas o ahora lo que se llama
m-teoría 11 configuraciones dimensionales
de cuerdas pero la clave es como nosotros
Ahora sé que dijo que el universo hace
No necesitamos un creador no nosotros no nosotros no
saber algo de ese tipo
porque eso es porque la ciencia no es solo

English: 
based on observational evidence science
is an inductive discipline it moves from
particular observational data and then
it tries to put all that data together
in theories and once it gets a theory a
comprehensive theory that'll explain all
the particulars ada scientists say we're
going to accept this as a rigorously
verified theory until what something
else comes along that could disprove it
exactly science by its very nature
because it's inductive because it moves
from particulars to universals to
particulars to generals because of that
science must always be open to a new
datum a new datum which could literally
lead to a scientific revolution you know
a lot of physicists thought that the

Vietnamese: 
dựa trên khoa học bằng chứng quan sát
là một môn học quy nạp mà nó chuyển từ
dữ liệu quan sát cụ thể và sau đó
nó cố gắng đặt tất cả dữ liệu đó lại với nhau
trong các lý thuyết và một khi nó có một lý thuyết
lý thuyết toàn diện sẽ giải thích tất cả
các chi tiết ada các nhà khoa học nói rằng chúng ta
sẽ chấp nhận điều này như một cách nghiêm ngặt
xác minh lý thuyết cho đến khi một cái gì đó
khác đi cùng có thể từ chối nó
chính xác là khoa học
bởi vì nó quy nạp bởi vì nó di chuyển
từ chi tiết đến phổ quát đến
cụ thể cho các tướng vì điều đó
khoa học phải luôn luôn mở ra một cái mới
mốc thời gian mới có thể theo nghĩa đen
dẫn đến một cuộc cách mạng khoa học mà bạn biết
rất nhiều nhà vật lý nghĩ rằng

Spanish: 
basado en la evidencia científica observacional
Es una disciplina inductiva de la que se mueve.
datos observacionales particulares y luego
Intenta juntar todos esos datos.
En las teorías y una vez que obtiene una teoría de una
Teoría integral que explicará todo.
Los detalles ada los científicos dicen que estamos
voy a aceptar esto como un riguroso
Teoría comprobada hasta qué algo.
viene otra cosa que podría refutarlo
exactamente la ciencia por su propia naturaleza
porque es inductivo porque se mueve
desde particulares hasta universales
detalles a los generales debido a eso
La ciencia siempre debe estar abierta a un nuevo
datum un nuevo datum que podría literalmente
conducir a una revolución científica que sabes
muchos físicos pensaron que la

French: 
basé sur la science des preuves d'observation
est une discipline inductive, il passe de
données d'observation particulières, puis
il essaie de mettre toutes ces données ensemble
dans les théories et une fois qu'il obtient une théorie d'un
théorie complète qui va expliquer tout
les scientifiques ada disent que nous sommes
va accepter cela comme une rigueur
théorie vérifiée jusqu'à ce que quelque chose
d'autre arrive qui pourrait le réfuter
exactement la science par sa nature même
parce qu'il est inductif parce qu'il bouge
des particuliers aux universaux à
les détails aux généraux à cause de cela
la science doit toujours être ouverte à une nouvelle
datum un nouveau datum qui pourrait littéralement
conduire à une révolution scientifique que vous connaissez
beaucoup de physiciens pensaient que le

Vietnamese: 
Hệ thống vật lý Newton
hoàn toàn chính xác giống như Stephen
Hawking tin rằng lý thuyết dây là
bằng cách này không có một scintilla của
bằng chứng cho lý thuyết dây và của tôi
những người bạn là những người thực sự
lo lắng ở đó
nhưng điểm tôi đang cố gắng đạt được là
cho tất cả ý định và mục đích chúng ta không thể
có thể nói rằng một lý thuyết vật lý
từ chối một sáng tạo vì
chúng tôi chỉ đơn giản là phải mở cho mới
dữ liệu tại mọi thời điểm không thể có cách nào chúng ta
có thể nói lý thuyết của chúng tôi đã hoàn thành
các nhà khoa học không biết những gì họ không
biết cho đến khi họ phát hiện ra đó là
điểm của kỷ luật quy nạp nó phải
được tôn trọng để bạn có thể nghĩ
Spencer cũng tốt nếu điều đó đúng
khoa học không thể bác bỏ Thiên Chúa và khoa học

Spanish: 
Sistema fisico newtoniano
fue absolutamente correcto al igual que Stephen
Hawking cree que la teoría de cuerdas es
por cierto no hay una chispa de
evidencia para la teoría de cuerdas y mi
amigos que son largueros son realmente
preocuparse allá arriba
Pero el punto que estoy tratando de llegar es
Para todos los efectos, no podemos
posiblemente diga que una teoría física
refuta una creación con certeza porque
simplemente tenemos que permanecer abiertos a nuevos
datos en todo momento no puede haber manera de que
podríamos decir que nuestra teoría es completa
Los científicos no saben lo que no saben.
Saber hasta que lo descubren esa es la
punto de las disciplinas inductivas que debe
ser respetado por lo que podría pensar
Spencer si eso es verdad si
La ciencia no puede refutar a Dios y la ciencia.

English: 
Newtonian physical system
was absolutely correct just like Stephen
Hawking believes that string theory is
by the way there's not a scintilla of
evidence yet for string theory and my
friends who are stringers are really
getting worried up there
but the point I'm trying to get to is
for all intents and purposes we we can't
possibly say that a physical theory
disproves a creation for certain because
we simply have to remain open to new
data at all times there can be no way we
could say our theory is complete
scientists don't know what they don't
know until they discover it that's the
point of inductive disciplines it must
be respected so you might think to
yourself well Spencer if that's true if
science can't disprove God and science

French: 
Système physique newtonien
était tout à fait juste comme Stephen
Hawking croit que la théorie des cordes est
par ailleurs il n'y a pas un scintilla de
preuve encore pour la théorie des cordes et mon
les amis qui sont des stringers sont vraiment
s'inquiéter là-haut
mais le point que j'essaie d'arriver est
à toutes fins utiles, nous ne pouvons pas nous
peut-être dire qu'une théorie physique
réfute une création pour certains parce que
nous devons simplement rester ouverts aux nouvelles
les données à tout moment il ne peut y avoir aucun moyen que nous
pourrait dire que notre théorie est complète
les scientifiques ne savent pas ce qu'ils ne savent pas
savent jusqu'à ce qu'ils découvrent que c'est la
point de disciplines inductives il doit
être respecté afin que vous puissiez penser à
vous bien Spencer si cela est vrai si
la science ne peut pas réfuter Dieu et la science

Vietnamese: 
thậm chí không thể chỉ ra rằng vũ trụ làm
không cần một người sáng tạo làm thế nào bạn có thể thoát ra
nói rằng có bằng chứng vật lý
vũ trụ cần một người sáng tạo
làm thế nào bạn có thể nói điều đó từ một
vấn đề đơn giản và đó là những gì được gọi là
một khởi đầu của một thời gian không
nhất thiết phải là một khởi đầu của thời gian trong này
vũ trụ mặc dù đó có thể là duy nhất
vũ trụ có vũ trụ của chúng ta
và nhân tiện, chúng tôi không có ý tưởng
liệu có đa vũ trụ hơn về
nhiều người trong một khoảnh khắc chúng ta không có ý tưởng
liệu có thể có một vũ trụ chuỗi
trong không gian chiều cao hơn của
lý thuyết dây hoặc lý thuyết m chúng ta không biết
dù điều đó có tồn tại hay không thì đó là
một khả năng thú vị mà chúng ta không biết
vũ trụ có được bạn biết không
mở rộng và ký kết hợp đồng và mở rộng

French: 
ne peut même pas montrer que l'univers ne
pas besoin d'un créateur comment pouvez-vous descendre
en disant qu'il y a des preuves physiques
que l'univers a besoin d'un créateur
comment pouvez-vous dire que d'un très
problème simple et c'est ce qu'on appelle
un début un début des temps pas
nécessairement un début de temps dans cette
univers si cela pourrait être le seul
univers il y a notre univers pourrait être
et par la façon dont nous n'avons aucune idée
s'il y a un multivers plus sur
multivers dans un instant, nous n'avons aucune idée
s'il pouvait y avoir un univers de cordes
dans l'espace de dimension supérieure de
la théorie des cordes ou m-théorie, nous ne savons pas
que cela existe ou non c'est un c'est
une possibilité intéressante, nous ne savons pas
si l'univers a été tu sais
l'expansion et la sous-traitance et l'expansion

Spanish: 
Ni siquiera puedo mostrar que el universo lo hace.
No necesito un creador como puedes bajarte
diciendo que hay evidencia física
que el universo necesita un creador
como puedes decir eso de uno muy
problema simple y eso es lo que se llama
un comienzo un comienzo de tiempo no
necesariamente un principio de tiempo en este
aunque el universo podría ser el único
universo hay nuestro universo podria ser
Y por cierto no tenemos idea.
si hay un multiverso más en
Multiversos en un momento no tenemos idea
si podría haber un universo de cuerdas
en el espacio dimensional superior de
Teoría de cuerdas o teoría m no sabemos
si eso existe o no es una es
una posibilidad interesante que no sabemos
si el universo ha sido usted sabe
expansión y contratación y expansión

English: 
can't even show that the universe does
not need a creator how can you get off
saying that there's physical evidence
that the universe does need a creator
how can you say that from one very
simple problem and that is what's called
a beginning a beginning of time not
necessarily a beginning of time in this
universe though that could be the only
universe there is our universe might be
it and by the way we have no idea
whether there's a multiverse more on
multiverses in a moment we have no idea
whether there could be a string universe
in the higher dimensional space of
string theory or m-theory we don't know
whether that exists or not it's a it's
an interesting possibility we don't know
whether the universe has been you know
expanding and contracting and expanding

French: 
et la sous-traitance, mais nous savons une chose
des preuves physiques que les trois
ces configurations ont besoin d'un début
notre univers a besoin du début
les multivers ont besoin d'un début plus sur
un moment oscillant des univers ou
les univers qui rebondissent ont besoin d'un début plus
à ce sujet dans un instant
chaîne d'espace de dimension supérieure
les univers ont besoin d'un début plus sur
dans un moment chacun d'entre eux a besoin d'un
en commençant et c'est pourquoi nous sommes à un très
conjoncture intéressante et nous en reparlerons
sur les preuves de ce début dans
juste une minute
mais nous sommes à un moment intéressant
en ce moment où nous arrivons à la
point où toutes les configurations connues de
question de l'énergie physique et physique
l'espace-temps semble avoir besoin d'un début maintenant

Vietnamese: 
và ký hợp đồng nhưng chúng tôi biết một điều
từ bằng chứng vật lý rằng cả ba
những cấu hình đó cần một sự khởi đầu
vũ trụ của chúng ta cần sự khởi đầu
nhiều người cần một sự khởi đầu nhiều hơn về
một khoảnh khắc dao động vũ trụ hoặc
vũ trụ nảy cần một sự khởi đầu nhiều hơn
trong một khoảnh khắc
chuỗi không gian chiều cao hơn
vũ trụ cần một sự khởi đầu nhiều hơn về điều đó
trong một khoảnh khắc mỗi người trong số họ cần một
bắt đầu và đó là lý do tại sao chúng ta ở rất
thời điểm thú vị và chúng ta sẽ nói chuyện
về bằng chứng cho sự bắt đầu từ
chỉ một phút
nhưng chúng ta đang ở một thời điểm thú vị
ngay bây giờ nơi chúng ta đang đến
điểm mà tất cả các cấu hình đã biết của
vấn đề năng lượng vật lý và
không-thời gian dường như cần một sự khởi đầu ngay bây giờ

English: 
and contracting but we do know one thing
from physical evidence that all three of
those configurations need a beginning
our universe needs the beginning
multiverses need a beginning more on
a moment oscillating universes or
bouncing universes need a beginning more
on that in a moment
higher dimensional space string
universes need a beginning more on that
in a moment every one of them needs a
beginning and that's why we're at a very
interesting juncture and we'll talk
about the evidence for that beginning in
just a minute
but we're at an interesting juncture
right now where we're getting to the
point where all known configurations of
matter of physics physical energy and
space-time seem to need a beginning now

Spanish: 
y contratando pero sí sabemos una cosa
de la evidencia física de que los tres
esas configuraciones necesitan un comienzo
nuestro universo necesita el comienzo
Los multiversos necesitan un comienzo más en
un momento de universos oscilantes o
Los universos rebotados necesitan un comienzo más.
sobre eso en un momento
cadena de espacio dimensional superior
los universos necesitan un comienzo mas en eso
en un momento cada uno de ellos necesita una
comenzando y es por eso que estamos en un muy
coyuntura interesante y hablaremos
acerca de la evidencia para ese comienzo en
solo un minuto
pero estamos en un momento interesante
en este momento donde estamos llegando a la
punto donde todas las configuraciones conocidas de
cuestión de física y energía física
El espacio-tiempo parece necesitar un comienzo ahora.

Vietnamese: 
chính xác thì tại sao nó lại như vậy
quan trọng là thực tế vật lý có thể tốt
có một khởi đầu vì nếu thực sự có
là một khởi đầu cho thực tế vật lý
bắt đầu của thực tế vật lý cũng là
sự khởi đầu của không-thời gian
bắt đầu không gian và thời gian
có thể là sự khởi đầu của thời gian
đa vũ trụ và nếu chúng ta có một khởi đầu
thời gian trước khi bắt đầu
vũ trụ và thậm chí không gian vật lý và
thời gian không là gì cả và nếu
vũ trụ không là gì cả
nó có thể làm là không có gì
bởi vì điều duy nhất không có gì có thể làm là
không có gì đó là ý nghĩa thực sự của
không có gì bây giờ là một thực tế vật lý trước
sự khởi đầu là không có gì và chỉ có thể

English: 
what is the exact why is that it so
important that physical reality may well
have a beginning because if there really
is a beginning to physical reality the
beginning of physical reality is also
the beginning of space-time it's the
beginning of space and time that's even
could be the beginning of the time of a
multiverse and if we have a beginning of
time then prior to that beginning the
universe and even physical space and
time itself was nothing and if the
universe was nothing then the only thing
it could do is nothing
because the only thing nothing can do is
nothing that's the real meaning of
nothing now a physical reality prior to
the beginning was nothing and could only

French: 
quel est l'exact pourquoi est-ce qu'il en soit ainsi
important que la réalité physique peut bien
avoir un début parce que si vraiment
est un début à la réalité physique du
début de la réalité physique est également
le début de l'espace-temps c'est la
début de l'espace et du temps qui est même
pourrait être le début du temps d'un
multivers et si nous avons un début de
temps alors avant que le début de la
univers et même espace physique et
le temps lui-même n'était rien et si le
l'univers n'était rien alors la seule chose
ça ne peut rien faire
parce que la seule chose que rien ne peut faire est
rien qui soit le vrai sens de
rien maintenant une réalité physique avant
le début était rien et ne pouvait que

Spanish: 
¿Cuál es la razón exacta por la que es así?
Es importante que la realidad física bien pueda.
tener un comienzo porque si realmente hay
Es un comienzo a la realidad física del
comienzo de la realidad física es también
el comienzo del espacio-tiempo es el
comienzo del espacio y el tiempo que es incluso
Podría ser el comienzo del tiempo de una
multiverso y si tenemos un principio de
tiempo antes de que comience el
universo e incluso espacio físico y
El tiempo en sí no era nada y si el
El universo no era nada, entonces lo único.
no podría hacer nada
Porque lo único que nada puede hacer es
nada es el verdadero significado de
nada ahora una realidad física anterior a
El principio fue nada y solo pudo.

English: 
do nothing then something else had to
move physical reality from nothing to
something because it could not have
moved itself from nothing to something
because it was nothing and could only do
nothing this is the problem you might be
wondering white
Stephen Hawking right at the end of his
book the grand design that nothing worth
it was the equations of gravity because
he desperately wants nothing not to be
nothing because if nothing's really
nothing then a physical reality has a
beginning prior to which physical
reality was nothing but physical reality
is gonna need a creator a creation event

Vietnamese: 
không làm gì sau đó phải làm gì khác
chuyển thực tế vật lý từ không có gì sang
một cái gì đó bởi vì nó không thể có
tự chuyển từ không có gì sang một cái gì đó
bởi vì nó chẳng là gì cả và chỉ có thể làm
không có gì đây là vấn đề bạn có thể là
tự hỏi màu trắng
Stephen Hawking ngay khi kết thúc
đặt thiết kế lớn mà không có gì đáng
đó là phương trình của trọng lực bởi vì
anh ấy rất muốn không có gì để không
không có gì vì nếu không có gì thực sự
không có gì sau đó một thực tế vật lý có một
bắt đầu trước vật lý
thực tế không là gì ngoài thực tế vật lý
sẽ cần một người tạo ra một sự kiện sáng tạo

Spanish: 
no hacer nada, entonces algo más tenía que
mover la realidad física de la nada a
algo porque no podía tener
Se movió de la nada a algo.
Porque no era nada y solo podía hacer.
nada este es el problema que podrías tener
preguntándose blanco
Stephen Hawking justo al final de su
Reserva el gran diseño que no vale nada.
Fueron las ecuaciones de la gravedad porque
no quiere desesperadamente nada para no ser
nada porque si nada es realmente
nada entonces una realidad física tiene una
a partir de antes de que física
La realidad no era más que la realidad física.
va a necesitar un creador un evento de creación

French: 
ne rien faire alors quelque chose d'autre devait
déplacer la réalité physique de rien à
quelque chose parce qu'il ne pouvait pas avoir
s'est déplacé de rien à quelque chose
parce que ce n'était rien et ne pouvait que faire
rien c'est le problème que vous pourriez être
se demandant blanc
Stephen Hawking à la fin de sa
réserver le grand dessein que rien ne vaut
ce sont les équations de gravité parce que
il ne veut désespérément rien ne pas être
rien parce que si rien n'est vraiment
rien alors une réalité physique a un
en commençant avant que physique
la réalité n'était que réalité physique
va avoir besoin d'un créateur d'un événement de création

English: 
outside of physical reality itself
that's the consequences and by the way
Larry King actually got this I mean at
one point I actually said during the
debate you know honestly you can't claim
that nothing is the equations of gravity
if you if you claim this then you're
gonna say either that nothing is
something or you're going to say that
the equations of gravity are nothing
neither of those statements works and if
there was equations of gravity prior to
the existence of physical reality
what would equations of gravity without
a physical universe be well they'd have
to be some kind of meant ativ some kind
of intellect 'va allottee which begs the
question in whose mind a mind outside of
physical reality
sounds like god to me Stephen as I said

Vietnamese: 
bên ngoài thực tế vật lý
Nhân tiện, đó là hậu quả
Larry King thực sự hiểu điều này
một điểm tôi thực sự đã nói trong
tranh luận bạn biết trung thực bạn không thể yêu cầu
không có gì là phương trình của trọng lực
nếu bạn nếu bạn yêu cầu điều này thì bạn
sẽ nói rằng không có gì là
một cái gì đó hoặc bạn sẽ nói rằng
phương trình của trọng lực không là gì cả
không có câu nào trong số đó hoạt động và nếu
có phương trình trọng lực trước
sự tồn tại của thực tế vật lý
những gì phương trình của trọng lực mà không có
một vũ trụ vật lý mà họ có
trở thành một loại ý nghĩa nào đó
của trí tuệ và allottee cầu xin
câu hỏi trong tâm trí của một tâm trí bên ngoài
thực tế vật lý
Nghe có vẻ như chúa đối với tôi Stephen khi tôi nói

Spanish: 
fuera de la realidad física misma
esas son las consecuencias y por cierto
Larry King realmente consiguió esto me refiero a
un punto que en realidad dije durante el
debate sabes honestamente que no puedes reclamar
Que nada son las ecuaciones de la gravedad.
Si si reclamas esto, entonces eres
Voy a decir que nada es
algo o vas a decir eso
Las ecuaciones de la gravedad no son nada.
ninguna de esas afirmaciones funciona y si
había ecuaciones de gravedad antes de
La existencia de la realidad física.
¿Qué serían las ecuaciones de gravedad sin
Un universo físico sea así tendrían
ser algún tipo de significado ativ algún tipo
de intelecto 'va asignado que ruega a la
pregunta en cuya mente una mente fuera de
realidad fisica
Me suena a dios Stephen, como dije.

French: 
en dehors de la réalité physique elle-même
c'est les conséquences et d'ailleurs
Larry King a effectivement ce que je veux dire à
un point que j'ai effectivement dit au cours de la
débattre vous savez honnêtement, vous ne pouvez pas prétendre
que rien n'est l'équation de la gravité
si vous si vous réclamez cela, alors vous êtes
va dire soit que rien n'est
quelque chose ou tu vas dire que
les équations de gravité ne sont rien
aucune de ces déclarations ne fonctionne et si
il y avait des équations de gravité avant
l'existence de la réalité physique
que seraient les équations de gravité sans
un univers physique soit bien qu'ils auraient
être une sorte de signifié ativ une sorte
de l'intellect 'va allottee qui prie le
question dans l'esprit d'un esprit en dehors de
réalité physique
sonne comme Dieu pour moi Stephen comme je l'ai dit

Spanish: 
Larry Larry King en realidad dijo a la una
punto sabes Leonard mucho fue suficiente
en el en el debate y él va, sí
Leonard, ¿cómo puedes hacer que algo venga?
de nada mi punto es que no puedes y
Si ese es el caso, entonces tal vez la física es
dibujo muy, muy cerca de mostrar una
evento de creación, así que mejor llegamos a la
evidencia de que es la consecuencia, de hecho,
Stephen Baran uno de mis muy buenos
colegas que está en una junta directiva
del Centro Magis en realidad escribió una
Artículo para las primeras cosas llamado mucho ruido.
sobre nada
Y la razón, por supuesto, es bastante clara.
bien vamos a bajar a la evidencia
Verás en este triángulo tres
diferentes áreas hay espacio-tiempo
Pruebas de geometría entropía y afinación.
O coincidencias antrópicas que vamos a

Vietnamese: 
Larry Larry King thực sự đã nói tại một
điểm bạn biết Leonard rất nhiều là
trong cuộc tranh luận và anh ấy đi
Leonard làm thế nào bạn có thể làm cho một cái gì đó đến
từ quan điểm của tôi là bạn không thể và
nếu đó là trường hợp thì có lẽ vật lý là
vẽ rất gần để hiển thị một
sự kiện sáng tạo tốt, chúng ta nên đến
bằng chứng đó là hậu quả trong thực tế
Stephen Baran một trong những người rất tốt của tôi
đồng nghiệp trong ban giám đốc
của Trung tâm magis thực sự đã viết một
bài viết cho những điều đầu tiên được gọi là nhiều ado
chẳng có gì
và lý do tất nhiên là khá rõ ràng
được rồi, hãy đi xuống bằng chứng
bạn sẽ thấy trong tam giác này
khu vực khác nhau có không gian thời gian
bằng chứng hình học entropy và tinh chỉnh
hoặc trùng hợp nhân loại chúng ta sẽ

English: 
Larry Larry King actually said at one
point you know Leonard a lot enough was
on the on the debate and he goes yeah
Leonard how can you make something come
from nothing my point is you can't and
if that's the case then maybe physics is
drawing very very close to showing a
creation event well we better get to the
evidence that's the consequence in fact
Stephen Baran one of my very good
colleagues who's on a board of directors
of the magis Center actually wrote an
article for first things called much ado
about nothing
and the reason of course is pretty clear
okay let's get down to the evidence
you'll see in this triangle three
different areas there space-time
geometry proofs entropy and fine tuning
or anthropic coincidences we're going to

French: 
Larry Larry King a effectivement dit à une
Indiquez que vous connaissez assez Leonard était
sur le débat et il va oui
Leonard comment pouvez-vous faire quelque chose venir
de rien mon point est que vous ne pouvez pas et
si tel est le cas, alors peut-être que la physique est
dessin très très proche de montrer un
événement de création et nous ferions mieux de se rendre à la
la preuve que la conséquence en fait
Stephen Baran un de mes très bon
collègues qui sont sur un conseil d'administration
du Magis Center a en fait écrit un
article pour les premières choses appelé beaucoup de bruit
à propos de rien
et la raison bien sûr est assez claire
ok passons à la preuve
vous verrez dans ce triangle trois
différentes zones il espace-temps
preuves de géométrie entropie et mise au point
ou des coïncidences anthropiques nous allons

French: 
prendre chacun de ces très très brièvement
mais ce que je veux que vous fassiez ce soir est de
si vous pouviez simplement griffonner notre
site web si vous voulez le réel
preuves mathématiques que je vais parler
à propos de vous pouvez simplement aller à Magis Entercom
il suffit d'aller à notre première page de destination appelée
la foi dans la science et tout cela est là
gratuitement gratuitement à notre vidéo par
vos conférences gratuites
par Alexander Vilenkin nous allons parler de
lui dans un instant sur les mathématiques de
un début et ainsi de suite, vous pouvez l'obtenir
tout y est
magis Entercom gratuitement, il suffit d'aller à
le premier avant
page d'atterrissage foi en signe de science
la foi et la raison et et vous le verrez
mais descendons à ces trois
preuve évidence pointe le premier

Vietnamese: 
lấy từng cái một rất ngắn gọn
nhưng những gì tôi muốn bạn làm tối nay là
nếu bạn có thể viết nguệch ngoạc xuống
trang web nếu bạn muốn thực tế
bằng chứng toán học mà tôi sẽ nói
về bạn chỉ có thể đến magis Entercom
chỉ cần đi đến trang đích đầu tiên của chúng tôi được gọi là
niềm tin vào khoa học và tất cả của nó là ở đó
miễn phí miễn phí cho video của chúng tôi bởi
sách bài tập thực sự miễn phí của bạn
của Alexander Vilenkin chúng ta sẽ nói về
anh ta trong một khoảnh khắc về toán học của
một khởi đầu và cứ thế bạn có thể có được nó
tất cả ở đó
magis Entercom miễn phí chỉ cần đi đến
mặt trước
niềm tin trang đích trong dấu hiệu của khoa học
niềm tin và lý trí và bạn sẽ thấy nó
nhưng chúng ta hãy xuống ba
bằng chứng chỉ điểm đầu tiên

Spanish: 
Toma cada uno de estos muy brevemente.
Pero lo que quiero que hagas esta noche es
Si solo pudieras garabatear nuestro
sitio web si quieres lo real
Pruebas matemáticas que estaré hablando
acerca de usted puede ir a Magis Entercom
solo ve a nuestra primera página de destino llamada
La fe en la ciencia y todo eso está ahí.
Gratis para nuestro video gratis por
su libro verdaderamente gratis lecturas gratis
Por Alexander Vilenkin hablaremos de
Él en un momento sobre las matemáticas de
un comienzo y todo lo demás puedes conseguirlo
está todo allí
magis entercom gratis solo ve a
el frente primero
página de destino fe en signo de la ciencia
Fe y razón y ya lo verás.
Pero bajemos a estos tres
evidencia evidencia apunta la primera

English: 
take each one of these very very briefly
but what I want you to do tonight is to
if you could just scribble down our
website if you want the actual
mathematical proofs that I'll be talking
about you can just go to magis Entercom
just go to our first landing page called
faith in science and all of it is there
free of charge free to our video by
yours truly free workbook free lectures
by Alexander Vilenkin we'll talk about
him in a moment on the mathematics of of
a beginning and so forth you can get it
it's all there
magis Entercom free of charge just go to
the front first
landing page faith in sign of science
faith and reason and and you'll see it
but let's get down to these three
evidence evidentiary points the first

Spanish: 
dos cruzando la parte superior del triángulo
Son pruebas de geometría de espacio-tiempo en
la entropía va a apuntar a una
comenzando no solo de nuestro universo sino una
comienzo de la realidad fisica
el tercero es el ajuste fino y
coincidencias antrópicas en realidad va
para apuntar a la inteligencia de la de
el creador en sí, así que vamos a ir
a través de esto muy rápido, pero ¿por qué conseguir
en pruebas de geometría espacio-tiempo y por lo
adelante porque este universo podría no ser
todo lo que hay ahora sabemos mucho acerca de
este universo hay muchas razones
por pensar que el Big Bang es verdad un
muchas razones básicamente unos 24
diferentes verificaciones independientes de
viene originalmente de ustedes saben
Edwin Hubble encuesta de los cielos
que por supuesto se complementa con
Penzias y Wilson quienes más tarde descubrieron.
los 2.7 grados Kelvin uniformemente

French: 
deux traversant le sommet du triangle
ils sont des preuves de géométrie espace-temps dans
entropie vont pointer vers un
en commençant non seulement de notre univers mais un
début de la réalité physique
le troisième à savoir affiner et
coïncidences anthropiques va réellement
pointer vers l'intelligence du
le créateur lui-même alors allons-y
à travers cela très rapidement, mais pourquoi obtenir
dans les preuves de géométrie espace-temps et ainsi
en avant parce que cet univers pourrait ne pas être
tout ce qu'il y a maintenant, nous savons beaucoup de choses sur
cet univers il y a beaucoup de raisons
pour penser que le Big Bang est vrai un
beaucoup de raisons essentiellement sur 24
différentes vérifications indépendantes de
il vient à l'origine de vous savez
Edwin Hubble levé du ciel
que bien sûr est complétée par
Penzias et Wilson qui ont découvert plus tard
le 2,7 degrés Kelvin uniformément

English: 
two going across the top of triangle
they're space-time geometry proofs in
entropy are going to point to a
beginning not just of our universe but a
beginning of physical reality
the third namely fine-tuning and
anthropic coincidences is actually going
to point to the intelligence of the of
the creator itself so let's just go
through this really quickly but why get
into space-time geometry proofs and so
forth because this universe might not be
all there is now we do know a lot about
this universe there's a lot of reasons
for thinking that the Big Bang is true a
lot of reasons basically about 24
different independent verifications of
it it comes originally from you know
Edwin Hubble survey of the heavens
that of course is complemented by
Penzias and Wilson who later discovered
the 2.7 degree Kelvin uniformly

Vietnamese: 
hai đi qua đỉnh tam giác
chúng là bằng chứng hình học không gian trong
entropy sẽ chỉ đến một
bắt đầu không chỉ của vũ trụ chúng ta mà còn
bắt đầu của thực tế vật lý
thứ ba là tinh chỉnh và
sự trùng hợp nhân loại đang thực sự diễn ra
để chỉ ra trí thông minh của
chính người sáng tạo nên chúng ta hãy đi
thông qua điều này thực sự nhanh chóng nhưng tại sao có được
vào bằng chứng hình học không-thời gian và như vậy
bởi vì vũ trụ này có thể không
tất cả bây giờ chúng ta biết rất nhiều về
vũ trụ này có rất nhiều lý do
vì nghĩ rằng Big Bang là sự thật
rất nhiều lý do về cơ bản khoảng 24
xác minh độc lập khác nhau của
nó xuất phát từ bạn biết
Edwin Hubble khảo sát thiên đàng
điều đó tất nhiên được bổ sung bởi
Penzias và Wilson, người sau đó đã phát hiện ra
Kelvin 2,7 độ

English: 
distributed radiation which showed you
know that the this radiation had to
emerge in basically a cosmic event it
had to emerge at a time when the
universe was almost homogeneous in in
order for it to we spread evenly
throughout the entire universe later on
of course it was verified by the two
coab satellites of cosmic background
Explorer satellites one and two the
Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe and
then finally the Planck satellite and so
we've got a lot of different ways of
verifying the Big Bang what do we think
about the universe today our our
universe the one we can have
observational data about what do we
think of it we think it's 13.8 billion
years old so 13.8 billion years old plus
or minus 100 million years there's a lot
of very good evidence for that age of
the universe we also think that the

Spanish: 
radiación distribuida que te mostró
saber que la esta radiación tenía que
emerger en básicamente un evento cósmico
tenía que surgir en un momento en que el
universo era casi homogéneo en en
Para que se extienda uniformemente
a lo largo de todo el universo más tarde
por supuesto que fue verificado por los dos
Coab satélites de fondo cósmico
Explorador de satélites uno y dos del
Sonda de anisotropía de microondas Wilkinson y
Entonces, finalmente, el satélite Planck y por lo
Tenemos muchas formas diferentes de
Verificando el Big Bang que pensamos
sobre el universo de hoy nuestro nuestro
universo el que podemos tener
datos de observación sobre qué hacemos
Pensemos que creemos que es 13.8 mil millones
años tan 13.8 mil millones de años más
o menos 100 millones de años hay mucho
de muy buena evidencia para esa edad de
El universo también creemos que la

French: 
rayonnement distribué qui vous a montré
savoir que le ce rayonnement devait
émerger essentiellement un événement cosmique, il
devait émerger à un moment où le
l'univers était presque homogène dans
commander pour que nous répandions uniformément
à travers tout l'univers plus tard
bien sûr, il a été vérifié par les deux
Coab satellites de fond cosmique
Explorer les satellites un et deux le
Sonde d'anisotropie à micro-ondes Wilkinson et
puis finalement le satellite Planck et ainsi
nous avons beaucoup de façons différentes de
vérifier le Big Bang qu'en pensons-nous
à propos de l'univers aujourd'hui notre notre
univers celui que nous pouvons avoir
des données d'observation sur ce que nous
pense que nous pensons qu'il est 13,8 milliards
ans, donc 13,8 milliards d'années, plus
ou moins 100 millions d'années, il y a beaucoup
de très bonne preuve pour cet âge de
l'univers nous pensons aussi que le

Vietnamese: 
bức xạ phân tán cho bạn thấy
biết rằng bức xạ này đã phải
về cơ bản là một sự kiện vũ trụ
đã phải nổi lên vào thời điểm
vũ trụ gần như đồng nhất trong
để nó cho chúng tôi trải đều
trên toàn bộ vũ trụ sau này
tất nhiên nó đã được xác minh bởi hai
vệ tinh coab của nền vũ trụ
Explorer vệ tinh một và hai
Đầu dò bất đẳng hướng lò vi sóng Wilkinson và
rồi cuối cùng là vệ tinh Planck và cứ thế
chúng ta có rất nhiều cách khác nhau để
xác minh Big Bang chúng ta nghĩ gì
về vũ trụ ngày nay của chúng ta
vũ trụ là thứ chúng ta có thể có
dữ liệu quan sát về những gì chúng ta làm
Nghĩ về nó, chúng tôi nghĩ rằng nó là 13,8 tỷ
tuổi 13,8 tỷ tuổi cộng
hoặc trừ 100 triệu năm có rất nhiều
bằng chứng rất tốt cho tuổi đó
vũ trụ chúng ta cũng nghĩ rằng

Spanish: 
universo está en algún lugar en el
barrio de unos cien mil millones
años luz en radio algo a lo largo
Esas líneas pero también pensamos que la
universo tiene aproximadamente 10 a la
80 bariones valen la pena de visible
importar
Un asunto invisible es el tipo que
hacer que todas las fuerzas del universo funcionen
Así que aquí es donde vas a
tienen fuerzas electromagnéticas fuertes
fuerza nuclear la fuerza débil esto es o
tienes materia que realmente absorbe
y emite luz absorbe y emite energía
así que tenemos alrededor del cinco por ciento de nuestra
universo como materia visible y hay
alrededor de 10 a los 80 bariones vale una
barión como una partícula pesada como un protón
o un neutrón 10 a la 80 es mucho, pero
Es muy finito muy muy finito y

English: 
universe is somewhere in the
neighborhood of about a hundred billion
light years in radius something along
those lines but we also think that the
universe has approximately 10 to the
80th baryons worth worth of visible
matter
an invisible matter is the kind that
make all the forces of the universe work
right so this is where you're going to
have electromagnetic forces strong
nuclear force the weak force this is or
you have matter that actually absorbs
and emits light absorbs and emits energy
so we've got about five percent of our
universe as visible matter and there's
about 10 to the 80th baryons worth a
baryon as a heavy particle like a proton
or a neutron 10 to the 80th is a lot but
it's very finite very very finite and

Vietnamese: 
vũ trụ ở đâu đó trong
khu phố khoảng một trăm tỷ
năm ánh sáng trong bán kính một cái gì đó dọc theo
những dòng đó nhưng chúng tôi cũng nghĩ rằng
vũ trụ có khoảng 10 đến
Baryons thứ 80 đáng giá
vấn đề
một vật chất vô hình là loại
làm cho tất cả các lực của vũ trụ hoạt động
đúng vậy, đây là nơi bạn sẽ đến
có lực điện từ mạnh
lực hạt nhân lực lượng yếu này là hoặc
bạn có vấn đề thực sự hấp thụ
và phát ra ánh sáng hấp thụ và phát ra năng lượng
vì vậy chúng tôi có khoảng năm phần trăm
vũ trụ như vật chất hữu hình và có
khoảng 10 đến 80 baryon trị giá một
baryon như một hạt nặng như proton
hoặc neutron 10 đến 80 là rất nhiều nhưng
nó rất hữu hạn rất rất hữu hạn và

French: 
l'univers est quelque part dans le
quartier d'environ cent milliards
années-lumière dans le rayon de quelque chose
ces lignes, mais nous pensons aussi que le
l'univers a environ 10 à la
80e baryons valables
matière
une matière invisible est le genre qui
faire fonctionner toutes les forces de l'univers
droit c'est donc là que vous allez
avoir des forces électromagnétiques fortes
force nucléaire la force faible c'est ou
vous avez une matière qui absorbe réellement
et émet de la lumière absorbe et émet de l'énergie
donc nous avons environ cinq pour cent de notre
univers comme matière visible et il y a
environ 10 au 80e baryons vaut la peine
baryon comme une particule lourde comme un proton
ou un neutron 10 au 80e est beaucoup, mais
il est très fini très très fini et très fini

French: 
En outre, nous avons probablement environ 30%
de notre univers est la matière noire une sombre
la matière n'absorbe ni n'émet
une lumière ou une énergie de la manière qui
la matière visible fait donc nous avons à propos de
vous savez environ six fois plus sombre
Matière que nous ne la matière visible et
soixante dix pour cent de notre univers est
ce qu'on appelle l'énergie noire et sombre
L'énergie n'est pas du tout comme la matière
la matière visible et la matière noire sont un
fin du spectre et et sombre
les énergies à l'autre bout de la
spectre et et penser à l'énergie sombre est
un peu comme un champ qui attache
lui-même au champ espace-temps et
provoque notre univers à se développer à un
taux accéléré si l'énergie sombre est
faire notre univers se développer et
accéléré et noter en ce moment 70% des
notre univers est l'énergie sombre parce que le
constante cosmologique est le positif

English: 
furthermore we probably have about 30%
of our universe is dark matter a dark
matter doesn't absorb or emit
a light or energy in the way that
visible matter does so we've got about
you know about six times more Dark
Matter than we do visible matter and
seventy percent of our universe is
what's called dark energy and dark
Energy's not like matter at all so
visible matter and dark matter are one
end of the spectrum and and dark
energies at the other end of the
spectrum and and think of dark energy is
kind of like a field that attaches
itself to the space-time field and it
causes our universe to expand at an
accelerated rate so dark energy is
making our universe expand and
accelerated and rate right now 70% of
our universe is dark energy because the
cosmological constant is positive the

Vietnamese: 
hơn nữa chúng ta có thể có khoảng 30%
vũ trụ của chúng ta là vật chất tối một bóng tối
vật chất không hấp thụ hoặc phát ra
một ánh sáng hoặc năng lượng theo cách đó
vấn đề có thể nhìn thấy vì vậy chúng tôi đã có về
bạn biết khoảng sáu lần tối hơn
Vật chất hơn chúng ta có thể nhìn thấy và
bảy mươi phần trăm vũ trụ của chúng ta là
cái gọi là năng lượng tối và bóng tối
Năng lượng không giống như vật chất
vật chất hữu hình và vật chất tối là một
kết thúc phổ và tối
năng lượng ở đầu kia của
quang phổ và nghĩ về năng lượng tối là
giống như một lĩnh vực gắn liền
chính nó đến trường không gian và nó
làm cho vũ trụ của chúng ta mở rộng tại một
tốc độ tăng tốc nên năng lượng tối
làm cho vũ trụ của chúng ta mở rộng và
tăng tốc và tỷ lệ ngay bây giờ 70%
vũ trụ của chúng ta là năng lượng tối vì
hằng số vũ trụ là tích cực

Spanish: 
Además, probablemente tengamos alrededor del 30%.
De nuestro universo es materia oscura un oscuro.
la materia no absorbe ni emite
Una luz o energía en la forma en que
La materia visible lo hace, así que tenemos acerca de
sabes seis veces más oscuro
La materia que nosotros la materia visible y
El setenta por ciento de nuestro universo es
lo que se llama energía oscura y oscuridad
La energía no es como la materia, en absoluto.
La materia visible y la materia oscura son uno
Fin del espectro y oscuro.
energías en el otro extremo de la
espectro y y pensar en la energía oscura es
algo así como un campo que se une
en sí al campo espacio-tiempo y
hace que nuestro universo se expanda en una
velocidad acelerada por lo que la energía oscura es
haciendo que nuestro universo se expanda y
Aceleró y califica en este momento el 70% de
Nuestro universo es energía oscura porque la
constante cosmológica es positiva la

English: 
universe is not going to collapse in
upon itself it's gonna keep expanding
and it will continue to expand until it
finally burns out well first all the
stars in the universe will burn out and
then eventually the universe will reach
their thermodynamic equilibrium a heat
death where absolutely no work will be
possible from within the universe that's
what's very likely to happen you can't
have 70 percent dark energy dark energy
then interacts with the space-time field
exactly the opposite way of matter
matter causes a an increased curvature
of space-time and that's going to cause
what looks like you know an attraction
effect and dark energy is going to cause
a repulsion of space-time right it's
like the mirror image if I can put it
that way of matter so it's coming too
close
the space-time field to accelerate
that's basically kind of what we know
about our universe or the age of our

French: 
l'univers ne va pas s'effondrer
sur lui-même ça va continuer à se développer
et il continuera à se développer jusqu'à ce qu'il
enfin grève bien d'abord tous les
les étoiles de l'univers vont griller et
puis finalement l'univers atteindra
leur équilibre thermodynamique une chaleur
la mort où absolument aucun travail ne sera
possible de l'intérieur de l'univers qui est
ce qui est très susceptible de se produire, vous ne pouvez pas
avoir 70 pour cent de l'énergie noire
puis interagit avec le champ espace-temps
exactement le sens opposé de la matière
la matière provoque une courbure accrue
de l'espace-temps et que ça va causer
à quoi ressemble tu sais une attraction
effet et l'énergie sombre va causer
une répulsion de l'espace-temps droit c'est
comme l'image miroir si je peux le mettre
cette façon de faire pour qu'il vienne aussi
Fermer
le champ espace-temps pour accélérer
c'est fondamentalement une sorte de ce que nous savons
à propos de notre univers ou l'âge de notre

Spanish: 
universo no va a colapsar en
sobre sí mismo va a seguir expandiéndose
y continuará expandiéndose hasta que
finalmente se quema bien primero todo el
Las estrellas en el universo se quemarán y
entonces eventualmente el universo alcanzará
su equilibrio termodinámico un calor
muerte donde absolutamente no habrá trabajo
posible desde dentro del universo que es
lo que es muy probable que pase no puedes
tienen un 70 por ciento de energía oscura energía oscura
luego interactúa con el campo espacio-tiempo
exactamente la manera opuesta de la materia
La materia causa una curvatura mayor.
del espacio-tiempo y eso va a causar
lo que parece que sabes una atracción
El efecto y la energía oscura van a causar.
una repulsión del espacio-tiempo correcto es
como la imagen del espejo si puedo ponerlo
esa forma de la materia por lo que viene también
cerrar
El campo espacio-tiempo para acelerar.
Eso es básicamente algo de lo que sabemos.
sobre nuestro universo o la edad de nuestro

Vietnamese: 
vũ trụ sẽ không sụp đổ trong
tự nó sẽ tiếp tục mở rộng
và nó sẽ tiếp tục mở rộng cho đến khi nó
cuối cùng cũng cháy hết
những ngôi sao trong vũ trụ sẽ bị đốt cháy và
rồi cuối cùng vũ trụ sẽ chạm tới
trạng thái cân bằng nhiệt động của chúng một nhiệt
cái chết hoàn toàn không có việc làm
có thể từ bên trong vũ trụ
những gì rất có thể xảy ra bạn không thể
Có 70 phần trăm năng lượng tối năng lượng tối
sau đó tương tác với trường không gian
chính xác theo cách ngược lại của vật chất
vật chất gây ra độ cong tăng
không-thời gian và điều đó sẽ gây ra
những gì trông giống như bạn biết một sự hấp dẫn
hiệu ứng và năng lượng tối sẽ gây ra
một sự đẩy lùi của không-thời gian phải không
giống như hình ảnh phản chiếu nếu tôi có thể đặt nó
cách đó của vấn đề vì vậy nó cũng đến
gần
trường không gian để tăng tốc
về cơ bản đó là những gì chúng ta biết
về vũ trụ của chúng ta hoặc thời đại của chúng ta

French: 
univers, il pourrait être la totalité des
la réalité physique il n'y a pas un
scintilla de preuves physiques que
dirait que le Big Bang est à la
début de la réalité physique, ainsi que
le début de l'univers
il n'y a pas un seul scintilla de preuves
preuves physiques qui diraient qu'il y a
un multivers ou une dimension supérieure
univers spatial à cetera mais
nous devons garder ces possibilités dans
l'esprit parce qu'ils sont possibles mais nous avons
obtenu cette ère de planck de l'univers
la gravité quantique qui provoque une certaine
possibilités nous avons aussi ce qu'on appelle
une condition inflationniste qui est
produite par l'énergie noire et que
condition inflationniste provoque la
possibilité d'un multivers causes et
vous mettez les deux ensemble et vous pouvez
ont en réalité une dimension supérieure
univers dans la dimension supérieure
espace de la théorie des cordes où vous avez
comme deux membranes tridimensionnelles
entrer en collision dans un volume en quatre dimensions
espace-temps en train de sortir

English: 
universe it might be the totality of
physical reality there's not one
scintilla of physical evidence that
would say that the Big Bang is at the
beginning of physical reality as well as
the beginning of the universe
there's not one scintilla of evidence
physical evidence that would say there's
a multiverse or a higher dimensional
space universe at cetera but
we have to keep those possibilities in
mind because they are possible but we've
got this planck era of the universe
quantum gravity which causes some
possibilities we also have what's called
an inflationary condition that's
produced by dark energy and that
inflationary condition causes the
possibility of a multiverse causes and
you put the two together and you can
actually have higher dimensional
universes in the higher dimensional
space of string theory where you have
like two three-dimensional membranes
colliding in a four dimensional bulk
space-time burping out additional

Vietnamese: 
vũ trụ nó có thể là toàn bộ
thực tế vật lý không có một
scintilla bằng chứng vật lý rằng
sẽ nói rằng Big Bang đang ở
bắt đầu của thực tế vật lý cũng như
sự khởi đầu của vũ trụ
không có một bằng chứng
bằng chứng vật lý sẽ nói rằng có
đa vũ trụ hoặc chiều cao hơn
vũ trụ không gian tại cetera nhưng
chúng ta phải giữ những khả năng đó
tâm trí bởi vì họ có thể nhưng chúng ta
có kỷ nguyên planck của vũ trụ
trọng lực lượng tử gây ra một số
khả năng chúng ta cũng có cái gọi là
một điều kiện lạm phát đó
được tạo ra bởi năng lượng tối và đó
tình trạng lạm phát gây ra
khả năng của một nguyên nhân đa vũ trụ và
bạn đặt hai cái lại với nhau và bạn có thể
thực sự có chiều cao hơn
vũ trụ ở chiều cao hơn
không gian của lý thuyết dây nơi bạn có
như hai màng ba chiều
va chạm trong một khối bốn chiều
không gian thời gian bổ sung

Spanish: 
universo podría ser la totalidad de
realidad física no hay uno
centella de evidencia física que
diría que el Big Bang está en el
comienzo de la realidad física, así como
el comienzo del universo
No hay una sola prueba de evidencia.
evidencia física que diría que hay
Un multiverso o una dimensión superior.
universo espacial en cetera pero
Tenemos que mantener esas posibilidades en
importa porque son posibles pero hemos
tengo esta era planck del universo
La gravedad cuántica que causa alguna
posibilidades también tenemos lo que se llama
una condición inflacionaria que es
producido por la energía oscura y que
condición inflacionaria causa la
posibilidad de un multiverso causas y
pones los dos juntos y puedes
en realidad tienen mayor dimensión
universos en la dimensión superior
Espacio de la teoría de cuerdas donde tienes.
como dos membranas tridimensionales
colisionando en un volumen de cuatro dimensiones
espacio-tiempo eructando adicional

Spanish: 
universos, etc. así que tienes algo
posibilidades fascinantes que tal vez
La realidad física va más allá de esto.
universo
un montón de multiverso es como un multiverso
una muy es un mega universo correcto y en
este mega universo justo pequeña burbuja
Los universos están apareciendo y hay una
razón por la que están saliendo
Puedes preguntar esto en el Q&A que es un muy
Buena razón para que eso sea producido.
por una condición inflacionaria esencialmente
aunque nuestro universo de acuerdo a esto
La hipótesis sería un universo burbuja.
en medio de billones y billones de otros
Universos de burbujas que están siendo tosidos.
en el multiverso que es una
posibilidad que significaría el universo
Es que la realidad física es mucho.
Más grande de lo que creemos que es y lo haría
significa que se remonta más en el tiempo
de lo que creemos que hace entonces nuestro
el universo hace sin embargo lo que hace eso
media

Vietnamese: 
vũ trụ vv để bạn có một số
khả năng hấp dẫn mà có lẽ
thực tế vật lý vượt xa điều này
vũ trụ
rất nhiều đa vũ trụ giống như đa vũ trụ
rất là một vũ trụ lớn phải và trong
vũ trụ lớn này phải bong bóng nhỏ
vũ trụ đang xuất hiện và có một
lý do tại sao họ đang bật ra
bạn có thể hỏi điều này trong phần hỏi đáp
lý do tốt cho nó được sản xuất
bởi một điều kiện lạm phát về cơ bản
mặc dù vũ trụ của chúng ta theo điều này
giả thuyết sẽ là một vũ trụ bong bóng
giữa hàng nghìn tỷ đồng
vũ trụ bong bóng đang bị ho
trong đa vũ trụ đó là một
khả năng đó có nghĩa là vũ trụ
là thực tế vật lý là nhiều
lớn hơn chúng ta nghĩ và sẽ
có nghĩa là nó quay ngược thời gian
hơn chúng ta nghĩ nó làm sau đó
tuy nhiên vũ trụ làm gì
nghĩa là

English: 
universes etc so you have some
fascinating possibilities that maybe
physical reality goes beyond this
universe
lots of multiverse a multiverse is like
a very it's a mega universe right and in
this mega universe right little bubble
universes are popping out and there's a
reason why they're they're popping out
you can ask this in the Q&A it's a very
good reason for it that that's produced
by an inflationary condition essentially
though our universe according to this
hypothesis would be one bubble universe
amidst trillions upon trillions of other
bubble universes that are being coughed
out in the multiverse that's a
possibility that would mean the universe
is that the physical reality is much
bigger than we think it is and would
mean that it goes back further in time
than we think it does then then our
universe does however what does that
mean

French: 
univers etc. afin que vous ayez des
possibilités fascinantes que peut-être
la réalité physique va au-delà
univers
beaucoup de multivers un multivers est comme
un très c'est un droit méga univers et
cette méga univers droite petite bulle
les univers apparaissent et il y a un
raison pour laquelle ils sont ils popping
vous pouvez demander cela dans le Q & A c'est un très
bonne raison pour que cela soit produit
par une condition inflationniste essentiellement
si notre univers selon cette
l'hypothèse serait un univers de bulle
parmi des milliards et des milliards d'autres
univers de bulles qui toussent
dans le multivers qui est un
possibilité qui voudrait dire l'univers
est-ce que la réalité physique est beaucoup
plus grand que nous le pensons et le serait
signifie qu'il remonte plus loin dans le temps
que nous pensons qu'il fait alors alors notre
l'univers fait cependant qu'est-ce que ça
signifier

Spanish: 
no significa nada porque como veremos en
un momento todos los multiversos deben tener una
Al principio no puedes tener un multiverso.
sin un principio lo mismo vale
cierto que en realidad podría haber un sabes
un efecto de rebote ahora una gran cantidad de
los físicos piensan que no hay un rebote
Efecto porque si tienes un 70% de oscuridad.
Energía en nuestro universo tal como lo conocemos.
hoy lo que significa que el universo va
para seguir acelerando y va a
seguir expandiéndose por siempre bien
Si ese es el caso y para todos los efectos
y propósitos te puedo asegurar de esto
no va a haber manera de que seas
va a tener un colapso de ese universo
Entonces, ¿cómo podría tener un colapso de la
universo en una etapa previa antes de esto
uno tendría que deshacerse de la oscuridad
energía y entonces tendrías que estallar
de vuelta en algún momento la mayoría de los físicos hacen
No creo que esto sea físicamente.

Vietnamese: 
nó không có nghĩa gì vì như chúng ta sẽ thấy
một khoảnh khắc tất cả nhiều người phải có một
bắt đầu bạn không thể có đa vũ trụ
không có sự khởi đầu thì điều tương tự cũng xảy ra
đúng là có thể có một bạn biết
một hiệu ứng nảy bây giờ rất nhiều
các nhà vật lý nghĩ rằng không có một sự nảy
có hiệu lực vì nếu bạn có 70% bóng tối
năng lượng trong vũ trụ của chúng ta như chúng ta biết
hôm nay có nghĩa là vũ trụ đang diễn ra
để tiếp tục tăng tốc và nó sẽ
tiếp tục mở rộng mãi mãi
nếu đó là trường hợp và cho tất cả các ý định
và mục đích tôi có thể đảm bảo với bạn về điều này
sẽ không có cách nào mà bạn
Sẽ có sự sụp đổ của vũ trụ đó
vậy làm thế nào bạn có thể có một sự sụp đổ của
vũ trụ trong giai đoạn trước đó
bạn phải thoát khỏi bóng tối
năng lượng và sau đó bạn sẽ phải bật nó
trở lại tại một số điểm hầu hết các nhà vật lý làm
không nghĩ rằng đây là thể chất

French: 
cela ne signifie rien parce que, comme nous le verrons dans
un moment tous les multivers doivent avoir un
en commençant, vous ne pouvez pas avoir un multivers
sans commencement la même chose est vraie
vrai il pourrait effectivement y avoir un vous savez
un effet rebondissant maintenant beaucoup de
les physiciens pensent qu'il n'y a pas de rebondir
effet parce que si vous avez 70% d'obscurité
l'énergie dans notre univers tel que nous le connaissons
aujourd'hui ce qui signifie que l'univers va
pour continuer à accélérer et ça va
continue à grandir pour toujours
si tel est le cas et à toutes fins utiles
et à des fins je peux vous assurer de cette
il n'y aura aucun moyen que vous soyez
va avoir un effondrement de cet univers
alors comment pourriez-vous avoir un effondrement de la
univers dans une étape précédente avant cette
un que vous auriez à se débarrasser de l'obscurité
l'énergie et alors vous auriez à le faire apparaître
retour à un moment donné la plupart des physiciens font
ne pense pas que c'est physiquement

English: 
it means nothing because as we'll see in
a moment all multiverses must have a
beginning you cannot have a multiverse
without a beginning the same thing holds
true there might actually be a you know
a bouncing effect now a lot of
physicists think there's not a bouncing
effect because if you have 70% dark
energy in our universe as we know it
today which means the universe is going
to keep accelerating and it's going to
keep expanding forever right
if that's the case and for all intents
and purposes I can assure you of this
there's going to be no way that you're
gonna have a collapse of that universe
so how could you have a collapse of the
universe in a previous stage before this
one you'd have to get a rid of the dark
energy and then you'd have to pop it
back in at some point most physicists do
not think that this is physically

Spanish: 
realista para todos los efectos y
propósitos que probablemente solo estemos en
sólo hay una expansión y había
Sólo habrá una expansión y
eso es que probablemente no haya
no fueron rebotes en el pasado sin embargo,
debería considerar la posibilidad tal vez
La energía oscura desapareció en el pasado.
y reapareció justo después
posiblemente así que vamos a entretenerlo todavía
Necesita un principio y lo mismo.
con universos espaciales de mayor dimensión
y así sucesivamente, ¿por qué podemos estar tan seguros?
sobre esto, así que um va en realidad de vuelta
a Stephen Hawking mismo Stephen
Hawking y Roger Penrose crearon la
Teoremas de primera singularidad de vuelta en el
temprano, en realidad, a finales de los 60 y
Eso se llamaba la pluma de los Hawking.
Pluma o singularidad pero claro que eso
Teorema de singularidad cambiado y la
razón por la que cambió fue porque nosotros

English: 
realistic so for all intents and
purposes you probably we're only on
there's only one expansion and there was
there's only gonna be one expansion and
that's that there probably wasn't
weren't bounces in the past however we
ought to consider the possibility maybe
the dark energy disappeared in the past
and reappeared right afterwards
possibly so let's entertain it still
needs a beginning and the same thing
with higher dimensional space universes
and so forth why can we be so confident
about this well um it goes actually back
to Stephen Hawking himself Stephen
Hawking and Roger Penrose created the
first singularity theorems back in the
early well actually the late 60s and
that was called the pen of the Hawking
pen or singularity but of course that
singularity theorem changed and the
reason that it changed was because we

French: 
réaliste donc pour toutes les intentions et
à des fins que vous probablement nous ne sommes que sur
il n'y a qu'une expansion et il y avait
il n'y aura qu'une expansion et
c'est qu'il n'y avait probablement pas
n'étaient pas des rebonds dans le passé mais nous
devrait envisager la possibilité peut-être
l'énergie sombre a disparu dans le passé
et réapparu juste après
peut-être alors divertissons-le encore
a besoin d'un début et de la même chose
avec des univers spatiaux de dimension supérieure
et ainsi de suite, pourquoi pouvons-nous être si confiants
à propos de ce bien euh il va en fait de retour
à Stephen Hawking lui-même Stephen
Hawking et Roger Penrose ont créé le
premiers théorèmes de singularité dans le
tôt bien en fait la fin des années 60 et
cela s'appelait le stylo du Hawking
stylo ou singularité mais bien sûr que
le théorème de la singularité a changé et la
raison pour laquelle cela a changé était parce que nous

Vietnamese: 
thực tế cho tất cả ý định và
mục đích của bạn có lẽ chúng tôi chỉ trên
chỉ có một bản mở rộng và đã có
sẽ chỉ có một bản mở rộng và
đó có lẽ là không
không bị trả lại trong quá khứ, tuy nhiên chúng tôi
nên xem xét khả năng có thể
năng lượng tối đã biến mất trong quá khứ
và xuất hiện lại ngay sau đó
có lẽ vì vậy hãy giải trí nó
cần một khởi đầu và điều tương tự
với vũ trụ không gian chiều cao hơn
và tại sao chúng ta có thể tự tin như vậy
về điều này tốt um nó thực sự trở lại
để Stephen Hawking mình Stephen
Hawking và Roger Penrose đã tạo ra
định lý số ít đầu tiên trở lại trong
thực sự sớm vào cuối thập niên 60 và
đó được gọi là cây bút của Hawking
bút hoặc số ít nhưng tất nhiên đó
Định lý số ít thay đổi và
Lý do nó thay đổi là vì chúng tôi

French: 
découvert la gravité quantique et l'inflation
de l'énergie noire si ces deux choses
changé toute l'échelle du Big Bang
et vous devez en quelque sorte refaire votre théorie
à partir de ce point sur ce que j'essaie de
dire si est un multivers est possible
mais nous avons donc dû refaire ces théories et
il commence en 1993, ce qui est un espace-temps un
la théorie de la géométrie essentiellement la
configuration de la géométrie spatio-temporelle
vous permet de faire des prédictions non seulement
prédictions sur notre univers, mais
prédictions sur d'autres possibles
univers prédictions sur même
multivers
de sorte que vous pouvez réellement dire si l'espace-temps
la géométrie est de cette façon alors vous auriez à
avoir un début si c'est cette autre façon
alors vous ne devriez pas avoir un
en commençant et ainsi de suite en 1993
deux individus dr. Alexander Vilenkin
qui est le directeur de l'Institut de

Spanish: 
Descubrió la gravedad cuántica y la inflación.
de la energía oscura por lo que esas dos cosas
Cambió toda la escala del Big Bang.
y tienes que rehacer tu teoría
a partir de ese momento en lo que estoy tratando de
decir si es un multiverso es posible
Pero así tuvimos que rehacer estas teorías y
comienza en 1993 lo que es un espacio-tiempo un
teoría de la geometría esencialmente la
Configuración de la geometría espacio-temporal.
te permite hacer predicciones no solo
predicciones sobre nuestro universo pero
predicciones sobre otras posibles
Universos predicciones sobre incluso
multiversos
por lo que en realidad se puede decir si el espacio-tiempo
La geometría es así, entonces tendrías que
tener un comienzo si es de otra manera
entonces no tendrías que tener un
comienzo y así sucesivamente y así sucesivamente en 1993
dos individuos dr. Alexander Vilenkin
quien es el director del instituto de

English: 
discovered quantum gravity and inflation
from dark energy so those two things
changed the whole scale of the Big Bang
and you kind of have to redo your theory
from that point on what I'm trying to
say though is a multiverse is possible
but so we had to redo these theories and
it starts in 1993 what's a spacetime a
geometry theory essentially the
configuration of space-time geometry
enables you to make predictions not only
predictions about our universe but
predictions about other possible
universes predictions about even
multiverses
so you can actually say if space-time
geometry is this way then you'd have to
have a beginning if it's that other way
then you wouldn't have to have a
beginning and so forth and so on in 1993
two individuals dr. Alexander Vilenkin
who is the director of the Institute of

Vietnamese: 
phát hiện ra lực hấp dẫn lượng tử và lạm phát
từ năng lượng tối nên hai thứ đó
đã thay đổi toàn bộ quy mô của Vụ nổ lớn
và bạn phải làm lại lý thuyết của mình
từ thời điểm đó tôi đang cố gắng
nói mặc dù là đa vũ trụ là có thể
nhưng vì vậy chúng tôi phải làm lại những lý thuyết này và
nó bắt đầu vào năm 1993, một không thời gian
lý thuyết hình học về cơ bản
cấu hình của hình học không gian thời gian
cho phép bạn đưa ra dự đoán không chỉ
dự đoán về vũ trụ của chúng ta nhưng
dự đoán về khả năng khác
dự đoán vũ trụ về thậm chí
nhiều
vì vậy bạn thực sự có thể nói nếu không-thời gian
hình học là cách này thì bạn phải
có một khởi đầu nếu nó theo cách khác
sau đó bạn sẽ không phải có một
bắt đầu và cứ thế tiếp tục vào năm 1993
hai cá nhân dr. Alexander Vilenkin
ai là giám đốc của viện

Vietnamese: 
vũ trụ học tại Đại học Tufts ở Boston
đã đến với dr. Arvind boorda người
vừa mới lên đường ở trường đại học
California Santa Barbara tại
Viện Cavalier có hai người họ
đến với nhau và tạo ra những gì
được gọi là hình học không gian thời gian đầu tiên
bằng chứng cho thấy lạm phát
lý thuyết về trọng lực lượng tử về cơ bản
bằng chứng đó có bốn điều kiện và bởi
cách nếu bạn muốn biết bốn
điều kiện bạn sẽ đi đâu
trung tâm magis.com và đầu tiên
trang đích và ở đó bạn sẽ tìm ra
trong bạn biết chi tiết thân mật tất cả
điều kiện bạn cần biết nhưng dù sao đi nữa
Điều này có bốn điều kiện và vào năm 1993 nó
đã nghĩ rằng vũ trụ của chúng ta và khác
vũ trụ lạm phát đã đáp ứng tất cả bốn
những điều kiện đó và trong việc đáp ứng cả bốn

French: 
cosmologie à la Tufts University à Boston
est venu avec dr. Arvind Boorda qui
était juste dans la rue à l'Université
de Californie à Santa Barbara au
Cavalier Institute là les deux
sont venus ensemble et et créé ce qui
appelé la première géométrie spatio-temporelle
la preuve qui expliquait l'inflation
théorie de la gravité quantique essentiellement
cette preuve avait quatre conditions et par
le chemin si vous voulez connaître les quatre
conditions où iriez-vous
magis center.com et à la première
page de destination et vous découvrirez
en vous connaissez tous les détails intimes
conditions que vous auriez besoin de savoir, mais de toute façon
cela avait quatre conditions et en 1993
on pensait que notre univers et d'autres
univers inflationnistes ont rencontré tous les quatre
ces conditions et à répondre aux quatre

English: 
cosmology at Tufts University in Boston
came together with dr. Arvind boorda who
was just up the street at the University
of California Santa Barbara at the
Cavalier Institute there the two of them
came together and and created what's
called the first space-time geometry
proof that accounted for inflationary
theory in quantum gravity essentially
that proof had four conditions and by
the way if you want to know the four
conditions where would you go
magis center.com and to the first
landing page and there you will find out
in you know intimate details all the
conditions you'd need to know but anyway
this had four conditions and in 1993 it
was thought that our universe and other
inflationary universes met all four of
those conditions and in meeting all four

Spanish: 
cosmología en la Universidad de Tufts en Boston
vino junto con el dr. Arvind boorda quien
estaba justo en la calle en la universidad
de California Santa Barbara en la
Instituto Cavalier allí los dos.
vinieron juntos y crearon y lo que es
Llamada la primera geometría espacio-temporal.
Prueba que explicaba inflacionaria.
La teoría de la gravedad cuántica esencialmente
Esa prueba tenía cuatro condiciones y por
El camino si quieres conocer los cuatro.
condiciones donde irías
magis center.com y al primero
página de destino y allí se enterará
en que conoces todos los detalles íntimos del
condiciones que necesitarías saber pero de todos modos
Esto tuvo cuatro condiciones y en 1993
Se pensaba que nuestro universo y otros
universos inflacionistas se reunieron los cuatro de
esas condiciones y en el cumplimiento de los cuatro

Vietnamese: 
trong những điều kiện đó thì vũ trụ của chúng ta
vũ trụ lạm phát khác sẽ có
bắt đầu vào năm 1997 mặc dù họ
phát hiện ra một lỗ hổng rất nhỏ chỉ là một
ít khả năng bạn có thể nhận được
ra khỏi bằng chứng này trong những gì được gọi là
điều kiện năng lượng cao của họ
không gian hình học chứng minh thứ ba
điều kiện không gian của họ
bằng chứng hình học và một khi đã được thực hiện
những gì đang xảy ra là mọi người
nghĩ rằng bằng chứng này không phải là
hoàn toàn kín gió
có một kẽ hở nhỏ trong đó nhưng sau đó
dr. Alan Guth đi cùng người có
chủ tịch cao của vũ trụ học tại MIT và ông
cũng là cha đẻ của lạm phát
lý thuyết Guth xuất hiện và thực sự nói
năm 1999 rất thành thật với bạn
bạn biết tình trạng này

French: 
de ces conditions alors notre univers
d'autres univers inflationnistes auraient
d'avoir un début en 1997 si elles
découvert une très petite échappatoire juste un
peu de chances que vous puissiez obtenir
sur cette preuve dans ce qu'on appelait
la condition de haute énergie de leur leur
preuve de la géométrie espace-temps la troisième
condition de leur de leur espace-temps
preuve de la géométrie et une fois que cela a été fait
ce qui se passe est que les gens
pensé d'accord cette preuve n'est pas
complètement hermétique
il y a une petite échappatoire mais
dr. Alan Guth est venu qui avait le
chaise haute de la cosmologie au MIT et il
est aussi le père de l'inflation
la théorie Guth est venu et a effectivement dit
en 1999 bien pour être très honnête avec vous
vous connaissez cette condition

Spanish: 
De esas condiciones entonces nuestro universo.
otros universos inflacionarios tendrian
tener un comienzo en 1997 a pesar de que
descubrió una laguna muy pequeña sólo una
poca posibilidad de que puedas conseguir
fuera de esta prueba en lo que se llamaba
la condición de alta energía de su su
la geometría del espacio-tiempo prueba la tercera
Condición de su de su espacio-tiempo.
Prueba de geometría y una vez hecho eso.
Lo que terminó sucediendo es gente
pensó bien esta prueba no es
completamente hermético
hay una pequeña laguna en ella, pero luego
Dr. Alan Guth vino quien tenía el
alta silla de cosmología en el MIT y él
También es el padre de los inflacionarios.
Teoría Guth vino y en realidad dijo
en 1999 bien para ser muy honesto contigo
sabes esta esta condición

English: 
of those conditions then our universe
other inflationary universes would have
to have a beginning in 1997 though they
discovered a very small loophole just a
little possibility that you could get
out of this proof in the what was called
the high-energy condition of their their
space-time geometry proof the third
condition of their of their space-time
geometry proof and once that was done
what wound up happening is people
thought okay this proof is not
completely airtight
there's a small loophole in it but then
dr. Alan Guth came along who had the
high chair of cosmology at MIT and he
also is the father of inflationary
theory Guth came along and actually said
in 1999 well to be very honest with you
you know this this condition

French: 
vous savez que cette échappatoire est si éloignée que
être sans importance alors il est allé de l'avant et
modélisé tous les inflationnistes connus
des univers modèles que nous pourrions obtenir et cela
était ce qu'il est essentiellement venu après
la modélisation en 1999, il a dit tout connu
vous connaissez des univers inflationnistes possibles
et les modèles des univers inflationnistes peuvent
être éternel dans l'avenir, mais ils
ne peut pas être éternel dans le passé chaque
un seul d'entre eux doit avoir un début
c'est immenses monnaies mais bien sûr il
n'a pas exclu complètement un multivers
il a en quelque sorte exclu que je veux dire exclu un
début d'un Mike d'un multivers, mais

Vietnamese: 
bạn biết kẽ hở này là rất xa
để không quan trọng sau đó anh ấy đã đi trước và
mô hình hóa tất cả các lạm phát được biết đến
mô hình vũ trụ chúng ta có thể nhận được và điều này
về cơ bản là những gì anh ấy đã đưa ra sau
Người mẫu năm 1999 cho biết tất cả đều biết
bạn biết vũ trụ lạm phát có thể
và các mô hình của vũ trụ lạm phát có thể
là vĩnh cửu trong tương lai nhưng họ
không thể là vĩnh cửu trong quá khứ
một trong số họ phải có một khởi đầu
Đây là bạc hà bao la nhưng tất nhiên rồi
không loại trừ hoàn toàn đa vũ trụ
nó loại trừ tôi có nghĩa là loại trừ một
bắt đầu một Mike của đa vũ trụ nhưng

English: 
you know this loophole is so remote as
to be unimportant then he went ahead and
modelled all the known inflationary
model universes we could get and this
was what he basically came up with after
the modeling in 1999 he said all known
you know possible inflationary universes
and models of inflationary universes can
be eternal into the future but they
cannot be eternal into the past every
single one of them must have a beginning
this is immense mints but of course it
didn't rule out completely a multiverse
it sort of ruled out I mean ruled out a
beginning of a Mike of a multiverse but

Spanish: 
Usted sabe que esta laguna es tan remota como
no ser importante entonces siguió adelante y
modelado todo lo inflacionario conocido
universos modelo que podríamos obtener y esto
fue lo que básicamente se le ocurrió después
El modelado en 1999 dijo todo lo conocido.
sabes posibles universos inflacionarios
y modelos de universos inflacionarios pueden
ser eternos en el futuro pero ellos
no puede ser eterno en el pasado cada
Solo uno de ellos debe tener un principio.
esto es inmensas mentas pero por supuesto
No descarté completamente un multiverso.
una especie de descartado me refiero a descartado una
comienzo de un Mike de un multiverso pero

English: 
the key thing to remember is that even
though this proof it still has a
loophole in it it still is a very valid
and usable proof today but in 2003 all
three of these physicists came together
Guth from MIT the Lincoln from Tufts and
boorda from Santa Barbara all came
together and they created what is now
referred to today as the BVG proof the
board of Lincoln Guth proof and or the
board of a Lincoln Guth theorem the same
thing right theorem is not a theory a
theorem is a proof right and so the
board of Lincoln Guth proof of 2003 has
but one condition ladies and gentlemen
only one condition for a beginning of a
physical configuration and that is that
the average Hubble expansion be greater
than zero
that's it what's a Hubble expansion a

French: 
l'essentiel à retenir est que même
si cette preuve, il a encore un
échappatoire en elle est toujours un très valide
et la preuve utilisable aujourd'hui mais en 2003 tout
trois de ces physiciens se sont réunis
Guth du MIT Lincoln de Tufts et
boorda de Santa Barbara sont tous venus
ensemble et ils ont créé ce qui est maintenant
appelé aujourd'hui la preuve BVG la
conseil d'administration de Lincoln Guth preuve et ou
bord d'un théorème de Lincoln Guth le même
chose théorème n'est pas une théorie
théorème est un droit de preuve et donc la
conseil de Lincoln Guth la preuve de 2003 a
mais une condition mesdames et messieurs
une seule condition pour le début d'une
configuration physique et c'est que
l'expansion moyenne de Hubble soit supérieure
que zéro
ça y est ce qui est une expansion d'un Hubble

Vietnamese: 
điều quan trọng cần nhớ là thậm chí
mặc dù bằng chứng này nó vẫn có
kẽ hở trong nó vẫn còn rất hợp lệ
và bằng chứng có thể sử dụng ngày hôm nay nhưng năm 2003 tất cả
ba trong số các nhà vật lý này đã đến với nhau
Guth từ MIT, Lincoln từ Tufts và
boorda từ Santa Barbara tất cả đã đến
cùng nhau và họ đã tạo ra những gì bây giờ
gọi ngày hôm nay là bằng chứng BVG
hội đồng chứng minh Lincoln Guth và hoặc
hội đồng quản trị của một định lý Lincoln Guth giống nhau
định lý đúng không phải là một lý thuyết
định lý là một bằng chứng đúng và vì vậy
Hội đồng quản trị của Lincoln Guth năm 2003 có
nhưng một điều kiện quý bà và quý ông
chỉ có một điều kiện để bắt đầu một
cấu hình vật lý và đó là
mở rộng Hubble trung bình sẽ lớn hơn
hơn không
đó là bản mở rộng của Hubble

Spanish: 
La clave para recordar es que incluso
aunque esta prueba todavía tiene una
laguna en ella todavía es una muy válida
y prueba utilizable hoy pero en 2003 todo
tres de estos físicos se reunieron
Guth del MIT Lincoln de Tufts y
Boorda de Santa Bárbara todos vinieron
juntos y crearon lo que es ahora
referido hoy como la prueba BVG la
junta de prueba Lincoln Guth y la o
junta de un teorema de Lincoln Guth el mismo
Lo teorema correcto no es una teoría de una
El teorema es una prueba correcta y por lo tanto la
Junta de prueba de Lincoln Guth de 2003 ha
pero una condición damas y caballeros
una sola condición para el comienzo de una
configuración física y eso es todo
La expansión media del Hubble sea mayor.
que cero
eso es lo que es una expansión de Hubble una

French: 
L'expansion Hubble est le taux d'expansion
d'un univers dans son ensemble
Donc, si le taux d'expansion de l'univers
ou multivers
dans son ensemble est supérieur à zéro non
peu importe la taille si elle est supérieure à
zéro cette configuration a besoin d'un
en commençant maintenant c'est un six très facile
preuve étape et si vous voulez savoir quoi
nous pouvons réellement passer par le Q & A
période, mais pour le moment vous êtes
va devoir prendre ma parole pour cela
ou vous pouvez aller à magis center.com
et vous pouvez voir la preuve entière
expliqué et vous pouvez également voir le
preuve mathématique il y a une logique
la preuve et il y a une preuve mathématique
et les deux preuves sont là sur le
le site par la façon dont il est un très bon
la preuve que c'est une preuve très difficile à
surmonter pour deux raisons numéro un
il n'y a qu'une seule condition que vous savez quand

Vietnamese: 
Mở rộng Hubble là tốc độ mở rộng
của toàn bộ vũ trụ
vì vậy nếu tốc độ mở rộng của vũ trụ
hoặc đa vũ trụ
như một tổng thể lớn hơn không
dù nhỏ đến đâu nếu nó lớn hơn
không có cấu hình cần một
bắt đầu bây giờ đây là một sáu rất dễ dàng
bước chứng minh và nếu bạn muốn biết những gì
chúng ta thực sự có thể vượt qua nó trong phần hỏi đáp
khoảng thời gian nhưng hiện tại là bạn
sẽ phải lấy lời của tôi cho nó
hoặc bạn có thể truy cập trung tâm magis.com
và bạn có thể thấy toàn bộ bằng chứng
giải thích và bạn cũng có thể thấy
bằng chứng toán học có logic
bằng chứng và có một bằng chứng toán học
và cả hai bằng chứng đều có trên
Nhân tiện, trang web này rất tốt
bằng chứng nó là một bằng chứng rất khó để
khắc phục vì hai lý do số một
chỉ có một điều kiện bạn biết khi nào

English: 
Hubble expansion is the expansion rate
of a universe as a whole
so if the expansion rate of the universe
or multiverse
as a whole is greater than zero no
matter how small if it's greater than
zero that configuration needs a
beginning now this is a very easy six
step proof and if you want to know what
we can actually go through it in the Q&A
period but for the time being you're
gonna have to take my word for it
or you could go to magis center.com
and you could see the entire proof
explained and you can also see the
mathematical proof there's a logical
proof and there's a mathematical proof
and both proofs are there on the on the
the website by the way it's a very good
proof it's a very difficult proof to
overcome for two reasons number one
there's only one condition you know when

Spanish: 
La expansión del Hubble es la tasa de expansión.
de un universo en su conjunto
así que si la tasa de expansión del universo
o multiverso
en su conjunto es mayor que cero no
importa lo pequeño que sea si es mayor que
cero que la configuración necesita una
comenzando ahora este es un seis muy fácil
paso de prueba y si quieres saber que
En realidad, podemos pasar por esto en el Q&A
período, pero por el momento eres
Tendré que tomar mi palabra por ello
o puedes ir a magis center.com
y podías ver toda la prueba
Explicado y también puedes ver el
prueba matemática hay una lógica
prueba y hay una prueba matemática
y ambas pruebas están ahí en el
El sitio web por la forma en que es una muy buena
prueba de que es una prueba muy difícil de
superar por dos razones número uno
solo hay una condición que sabes cuando

Vietnamese: 
bạn có bốn điều kiện bạn có thể bắt đầu
tìm kiếm sơ hở khi bạn lắp ráp
điều kiện nhưng nếu bạn chỉ có một
điều kiện thực sự rất khó để
từ chối và điều thứ hai là
một điều kiện là hoàn toàn phổ biến
áp dụng tại sao vậy hãy xem
tại vũ trụ của chúng ta vũ trụ của chúng ta có bóng tối
năng lượng lạm phát của nó tất cả các bong bóng khác
vũ trụ trong một đa vũ trụ giả thuyết
cũng sẽ phải có một điểm sinh
cái nào nhỏ hơn thì dĩ nhiên là
tổng đường kính của vũ trụ
rằng họ sẽ có ngày hôm nay có nghĩa là
tất nhiên họ cũng sẽ phải
mở rộng nếu họ đang mở rộng họ có
một bản mở rộng Hubble trung bình lớn hơn
không, nhưng hơn thế nữa, đa vũ trụ bạn
không thể có đa vũ trụ mà không
lạm phát là điều duy nhất tạo nên một

Spanish: 
Tienes cuatro condiciones para empezar.
encontrando lagunas a medida que ensamblas el
Condición pero si solo tienes uno
condición es realmente muy difícil
refutar y lo segundo es esto
una condición es absolutamente universal
aplicable por qué tan bien echemos un vistazo
en nuestro universo nuestro universo tiene oscuridad
energía es inflacionista todas las demás burbujas
Universos en un hipotético multiverso.
También tendría que tener un punto de nacimiento.
que era más pequeño que el del
El total del diámetro del universo.
que tendrían hoy lo que significa
por supuesto ellos también tendrían que ser
expandiendo si están expandiendo tienen
una expansión media del Hubble mayor que
cero pero además cada multiverso te
no puede tener un multiverso que no sea
La inflación lo único que hace una

French: 
vous avez quatre conditions, vous pouvez commencer
trouver des failles pendant que vous assemblez le
condition mais si vous n'en avez qu'une
condition, il est vraiment très difficile de
réfuter et la deuxième chose est-ce
une condition est absolument universelle
applicable pourquoi si bien, jetons un coup d'oeil
à notre univers notre univers est sombre
l'énergie de son inflation toute autre bulle
univers dans un multivers hypothétique
devrait également avoir un point de naissance
qui était plus petit alors bien sûr le la
le total d'un diamètre de l'univers
qu'ils auraient aujourd'hui ce qui signifie
bien sûr, eux aussi devraient être
en expansion s'ils élargissent ils ont
une expansion moyenne de Hubble supérieure à
zéro mais en outre chaque multivers vous
ne peut pas avoir un multivers qui n'est pas
l'inflation est la seule chose qui fait

English: 
you have four conditions you can start
finding loopholes as you assemble the
condition but if you only have one
condition it's really really hard to
disprove and the second thing is this
one condition is absolutely universally
applicable why so well let's take a look
at our universe our universe has dark
energy its inflationary all other bubble
universes in a hypothetical multiverse
would also have to have a birth point
which was smaller then of course the the
the the total a diameter of the universe
that they would have today which means
of course they too would have to be
expanding if they're expanding they have
an average Hubble expansion greater than
zero but moreover every multiverse you
cannot have a multiverse that is not
inflation the only thing that makes a

Vietnamese: 
đa vũ trụ có thể là lạm phát nhưng
chờ một chút nếu đa vũ trụ phải
lạm phát nó phải có trung bình
Mở rộng Hubble lớn hơn 0
nhưng nếu nó có Hubble trung bình
mở rộng lớn hơn 0 nó phải có
một
đạt được những gì về chiều cao hơn
không gian vũ trụ hai
màng ba chiều đó là
va chạm trong số lượng lớn bốn chiều
không gian thời gian bổ sung
vũ trụ mỗi một trong những điều kiện đó
phải tạo mầm có nghĩa là
nó đang mở rộng nó có một Hubble trung bình
mở rộng lớn hơn 0
rất khó để thoát khỏi điều này
ồ nhân tiện, một vũ trụ nảy

English: 
multiverse possible is inflation but
wait a minute if a multiverse has to be
inflationary it must have an average
Hubble expansion greater than zero
but if it has an average Hubble
expansion greater than zero it must have
a
gaining what about higher dimensional
space universes those two
three-dimensional membranes that are
colliding in the four dimensional bulk
space-time burping out additional
universes every one of those conditions
has to have nucleation which means that
it is expanding it has an average Hubble
expansion greater than zero
it is very difficult to get out of this
oh by the way a bouncing universe that

French: 
multivers possible est l'inflation mais
attendez une minute si un multivers doit être
inflationniste, il doit avoir une moyenne
Expansion de Hubble supérieure à zéro
mais s'il a une moyenne Hubble
expansion supérieure à zéro, il doit avoir
une
gagner que dire de plus haute dimension
univers de l'espace ces deux
membranes tridimensionnelles qui sont
entrer en collision dans la masse en quatre dimensions
espace-temps en train de sortir
univers chacun de ces conditions
doit avoir une nucléation qui signifie que
il est en expansion, il a une moyenne Hubble
expansion supérieure à zéro
il est très difficile de sortir de cette
oh au fait, un univers qui rebondit

Spanish: 
multiverso posible es la inflación pero
espera un minuto si un multiverso tiene que ser
Inflacionista debe tener un promedio.
Expansión del Hubble mayor a cero.
Pero si tiene un Hubble medio.
expansión mayor que cero debe tener
una
ganando qué hay de mayor dimensión
universos espaciales esos dos
membranas tridimensionales que se encuentran
colisionando en el volumen de cuatro dimensiones
espacio-tiempo eructando adicional
universos cada una de esas condiciones
tiene que tener nucleación lo que significa que
se está expandiendo tiene un promedio de Hubble
expansión mayor que cero
Es muy difícil salir de esto.
Oh, por cierto, un universo que rebota

English: 
expands and contracts if it begins with
an expansion which it would have to in
any known scenario the average Hubble
expansion would have to be greater than
zero which means it must have a
beginning very difficult to get out of
this proof now there is one possible way
of trying to escape a beginning from the
board of a Lincoln and Guth proof but if
you're going to escape a beginning from
the that proved by the Gordon Board of a
Lincoln and Guth proof what are you
gonna have to do you got to make sure it
does that this configuration doesn't
have an average Hubble expansion greater
than zero so you've got to make sure
then that that universe is not expanding
well how do you do that I've got it a
perfectly static universe so perhaps the
universe according to the conjecture of

French: 
se développe et se contracte s'il commence par
une expansion qu'il devrait en
tout scénario connu la moyenne Hubble
l'expansion devrait être supérieure à
zéro ce qui signifie qu'il doit avoir un
commence très difficile de sortir de
cette preuve maintenant il y a un moyen possible
d'essayer d'échapper à un début de la
conseil d'administration d'une preuve Lincoln et Guth mais si
vous allez échapper à un début de
le qui prouvé par le Gordon Board d'un
Lincoln et Guth prouvent ce que tu es
va devoir faire vous devez vous assurer qu'il
est-ce que cette configuration ne
avoir une expansion moyenne de Hubble supérieure
que zéro, donc vous devez vous assurer
alors que cet univers ne se développe pas
bien comment faites-vous que je l'ai un
univers parfaitement statique alors peut-être le
univers selon la conjecture de

Vietnamese: 
mở rộng và hợp đồng nếu nó bắt đầu bằng
một bản mở rộng mà nó sẽ phải
bất kỳ kịch bản được biết đến trung bình Hubble
mở rộng sẽ phải lớn hơn
không có nghĩa là nó phải có một
bắt đầu rất khó khăn để thoát ra
bằng chứng này bây giờ có một cách có thể
cố gắng để thoát khỏi một khởi đầu từ
hội đồng quản trị của một bằng chứng Lincoln và Guth nhưng nếu
bạn sẽ thoát khỏi một khởi đầu từ
điều đó đã được chứng minh bởi Hội đồng Gordon của một
Lincoln và Guth chứng minh bạn là ai
sẽ phải làm bạn phải chắc chắn rằng nó
cấu hình này không
có độ mở rộng Hubble trung bình lớn hơn
hơn không nên bạn phải chắc chắn
thế thì vũ trụ đó không mở rộng
làm thế nào để bạn làm điều đó tôi đã có nó một
vũ trụ hoàn toàn tĩnh nên có lẽ
vũ trụ theo phỏng đoán của

Spanish: 
Se expande y se contrae si comienza con
una expansión que tendría que hacer en
Cualquier escenario conocido del Hubble medio
la expansión tendría que ser mayor que
cero, lo que significa que debe tener una
comenzando muy difícil salir de
esta prueba ahora hay una manera posible
de tratar de escapar de un comienzo de la
tablero de una prueba de Lincoln y Guth pero si
vas a escapar de un comienzo de
El que probó la Junta de Gordon de una
Lincoln y Guth prueban lo que eres
Tendrás que hacer tienes que asegurarte
hace que esta configuración no lo hace
tener una expansión media del Hubble mayor
de cero, así que tienes que asegurarte
entonces ese universo no se está expandiendo
Bueno, ¿cómo se hace eso lo tengo una
Universo perfectamente estático así que tal vez el
universo según la conjetura de

Vietnamese: 
vũ trụ tĩnh vĩnh cửu có lẽ
vũ trụ đã mở rộng trở lại như
lòng tốt đang diễn ra với số lượng vô hạn
của thời gian bạn với tôi và nó là vô tận
lượng thời gian như một vũ trụ tĩnh và
cuối cùng một ngày 13,8 tỷ năm trước
nó đã bùng nổ những gì sai với điều đó
định đề tốt ngoài thực tế là
là V Lincoln trong anh ấy và đồng nghiệp của anh ấy
đã cho thấy nó lượng tử
cơ học dưới
và điều đó sẽ từ chối nó ngay lập tức
đó cũng là một mâu thuẫn logic
và các quý ông tại sao lại như vậy bởi vì nếu
bạn sẽ có một điều kiện
kéo dài trong một khoảng thời gian vô tận
nó phải hoàn toàn ổn định bạn
không thể có một di căn hoặc một phần
tình trạng không ổn định sẽ xảy ra
không thay đổi so với số tiền vô hạn

Spanish: 
el universo eternamente estático tal vez
el universo se estaba extendiendo hacia atrás como
bondad pasando por una cantidad infinita
del tiempo que estás conmigo y es infinito
cantidad de tiempo como un universo estático y
Finalmente un día hace 13.8 mil millones de años.
fue boom lo que está mal con eso
postulado bien aparte del hecho de que
Es V Lincoln en su y su colega
Ya he demostrado que es cuántica
mecánicamente bajo
y eso va a refutarlo de inmediato
También es una contradicción lógica, señoras.
y señores por qué es eso porque si
vas a tener una condición que
dura un tiempo infinito
tiene que ser perfectamente estable tu
no puede tener una metaestable o parcialmente
condición inestable que va a
permanecerá igual en una cantidad infinita

English: 
the eternally static universe perhaps
the universe was extending back as
goodness going on for an infinite amount
of time you with me and it's infinite
amount of time as a static universe and
finally one day 13.8 billion years ago
it went boom what's wrong with that
postulate well aside from the fact that
is V Lincoln in his and his colleague
have already shown it's quantum
mechanically under
and that's gonna disprove it right away
it's also a logical contradiction ladies
and gentlemen why is that because if
you're going to have a condition that
lasts for an infinite amount of time
it's got to be perfectly stable you
can't have a metastable or a partially
unstable condition that's going to
remain the same over an infinite amount

French: 
l'univers éternellement statique peut-être
l'univers s'étendait comme
bonté passe pour une quantité infinie
de temps avec moi et il est infini
quantité de temps comme un univers statique et
enfin un jour il y a 13,8 milliards d'années
il a explosé ce qui ne va pas avec ça
postuler bien en dehors du fait que
est V Lincoln dans son et son collègue
ont déjà montré qu'il est quantique
mécaniquement sous
et ça va le prouver tout de suite
c'est aussi une contradiction logique mesdames
et messieurs pourquoi est-ce parce que si
vous allez avoir une condition que
dure pendant une durée infinie
ça doit être parfaitement stable
ne peut pas avoir un métastable ou partiellement
condition instable qui va
rester le même sur une quantité infinie

English: 
of time it's impossible therefore you
have to have a perfectly stable
condition everybody with me so far now
when you get to the Big Bang 13.8
billion years ago and we know that a Big
Bang happened 13.8 billion years ago the
universe can't be perfectly stable
anymore
there has to be some metastable element
in it because if there weren't some
metastable elements and partially
unstable element in it it would have
never unraveled and exploded but wait a
minute in order for it to last an
infinite amount of time it has to be
perfectly stable and then in order for
it to explode at the time of the Big
Bang it has to be partially unstable
that's a contradiction a partially
unstable perfectly stable configuration
that's not good
John is 6 4 & 6 3 in the same respect at

French: 
de temps il est impossible donc vous
avoir une stabilité parfaite
conditionner tout le monde avec moi jusqu'à présent maintenant
quand vous arrivez au Big Bang 13.8
il y a des milliards d'années et nous savons qu'un grand
Bang est arrivé il y a 13,8 milliards d'années, le
l'univers ne peut pas être parfaitement stable
plus
il doit y avoir un élément métastable
parce que s'il n'y avait pas
éléments métastables et partiellement
élément instable, il aurait
jamais démêlé et a explosé, mais attendez un
minute pour qu'il dure un
quantité infinie de temps, il doit être
parfaitement stable et ensuite pour
à exploser à l’époque du Big
Bang, il doit être partiellement instable
c'est une contradiction partiellement
configuration instable et parfaitement stable
ce n'est pas bon
John est 6 4 & 6 3 dans le même respect à

Vietnamese: 
do đó không thể vì thế bạn
phải có một sự ổn định hoàn toàn
điều kiện mọi người với tôi cho đến nay
khi bạn đến Big Bang 13.8
tỷ năm trước và chúng ta biết rằng một Big
Bang đã xảy ra cách đây 13,8 tỷ năm
vũ trụ không thể hoàn toàn ổn định
nữa không
phải có một số yếu tố siêu bền
trong đó bởi vì nếu không có
yếu tố siêu bền và một phần
yếu tố không ổn định trong nó sẽ có
không bao giờ làm sáng tỏ và bùng nổ nhưng chờ đợi một
phút để nó kéo dài
số lượng thời gian vô hạn phải có
hoàn toàn ổn định và sau đó để
nó phát nổ vào thời điểm lớn
Bang nó phải không ổn định một phần
đó là một mâu thuẫn một phần
cấu hình không ổn định hoàn toàn ổn định
điều đó không tốt
John là 6 4 & 6 3 trong cùng một sự tôn trọng tại

Spanish: 
de tiempo es imposible por lo tanto usted
Tiene que tener una estabilidad perfecta.
condiciona a todos conmigo hasta ahora
cuando llegues al Big Bang 13.8
Hace mil millones de años y sabemos que una gran
Bang sucedió hace 13.8 mil millones de años la
el universo no puede ser perfectamente estable
nunca más
Tiene que haber algún elemento metaestable.
en ella porque si no hubiera alguna
Elementos metastables y parcialmente.
elemento inestable en el que tendría
Nunca se desenredó y explotó, pero espera un
minuto para que dure un
cantidad infinita de tiempo que tiene que ser
perfectamente estable y luego en orden para
para explotar en el momento de la Gran
Bang tiene que ser parcialmente inestable
eso es una contradicción parcialmente
configuración inestable perfectamente estable
eso no es bueno
John es 6 4 y 6 3 en el mismo sentido en

French: 
au même endroit dans le temps, vous ne pouvez pas dire
cette
de toute façon il est quantique instable quelle est la
le point n'existe pas connu
configuration aujourd'hui qui ne nécessite pas
un début, nous sommes à un point ou il semble
comme toutes les configurations physiques connues
exige un début maintenant je veux juste
prendre très rapidement la preuve d'entropie
et puis arriver à quelques déclarations
de Alexander Vilenkin
cela pourrait résumer cela, mais l'entropie est
aussi très intéressant parce que l'entropie est
Albert Einstein a observé une fois si chaque
autre loi physique est modifiée
entropie la deuxième loi de la thermodynamique
est la seule loi physique qui est peu probable
être modifié parce qu'il n'est pas basé

English: 
the same place in time you can't say
that
anyway it's quantum unstable what's the
point there doesn't exist any known
configuration today that doesn't require
a beginning we're at a point or it seems
like all known physical configurations
require a beginning now I want to just
take the entropy evidence very quickly
and then get to a couple of statements
from Alexander Vilenkin
that might sum this up but entropy is
also very interesting because entropy is
Albert Einstein once observed if every
other physical law is modified
entropy the second law of thermodynamics
is the one physical law that is unlikely
to be modified because it is not based

Vietnamese: 
cùng một thời điểm bạn không thể nói
cái đó
dù sao thì lượng tử không ổn định là gì
điểm không tồn tại bất kỳ được biết đến
cấu hình ngày nay không yêu cầu
một khởi đầu chúng ta đang ở một điểm hoặc có vẻ như
giống như tất cả các cấu hình vật lý đã biết
yêu cầu một sự khởi đầu bây giờ tôi muốn chỉ
lấy bằng chứng entropy rất nhanh
và sau đó nhận được một vài tuyên bố
từ Alexander Vilenkin
điều đó có thể tổng hợp nhưng entropy là
cũng rất thú vị vì entropy là
Albert Einstein từng quan sát nếu mọi
luật vật lý khác được sửa đổi
entropy định luật thứ hai của nhiệt động lực học
là một định luật vật lý không có khả năng
được sửa đổi bởi vì nó không dựa trên

Spanish: 
el mismo lugar en el tiempo que no puedes decir
ese
de todos modos es cuántica inestable cuál es el
No existe ningún punto conocido.
Configuración hoy que no requiere
Un comienzo estamos en un punto o parece
como todas las configuraciones físicas conocidas
requiere un comienzo ahora quiero solo
tomar la evidencia de entropía muy rápidamente
y luego llegar a un par de declaraciones
de Alexander Vilenkin
Eso podría resumir esto pero la entropía es
También muy interesante porque la entropía es.
Albert Einstein observó una vez si cada
otra ley fisica es modificada
La entropía de la segunda ley de la termodinámica.
es la única ley física que es poco probable
para ser modificado porque no esta basado

Spanish: 
únicamente en un físico químico o
propiedad termodinámica su matemática
La entropía saca su verdad de la probabilidad.
Teoria todas las configuraciones ordenadas son
Lo menos probable que lo desordenado.
¿Significa eso que voy a hacer esto?
simple por favor, no me obligue a hacerlo en el
Preguntas y respuestas si necesito ser más complejo, pero
Aquí está el pensamiento básico si estás
Mirando el desequilibrio termodinámico.
Es bueno en un sistema físico porque si
tienes equilibrio, entonces tienes
algo de potencial para hacer trabajo en lo que es malo
Un sistema físico es el equilibrio porque
Si un sistema físico es perfecto.
El equilibrio no va a ser capaz de

English: 
solely on a physical chemical or
thermodynamic property its mathematical
entropy draws its truth from probability
theory all ordered configurations are
less probable than disordered ones what
does that mean I'm going to make this
simple please don't hold me to it in the
Q&A if I need to get more complex but
here's the basic thought if you're
looking at thermodynamics disequilibrium
is good in a physical system because if
you have dis equilibrium then you've got
some potential to do work what's bad in
a physical system is equilibrium because
if a physical system is that perfect
equilibrium is not going to be able to

Vietnamese: 
chỉ trên một hóa chất vật lý hoặc
tính chất nhiệt động của nó toán học
entropy rút ra sự thật từ xác suất
lý thuyết tất cả các cấu hình được đặt hàng là
ít có khả năng hơn những người bị rối loạn những gì
điều đó có nghĩa là tôi sẽ làm điều này
đơn giản xin đừng giữ tôi trong đó
Hỏi và đáp nếu tôi cần phức tạp hơn nhưng
đây là suy nghĩ cơ bản nếu bạn
nhìn vào sự mất cân bằng nhiệt động lực học
là tốt trong một hệ thống vật lý bởi vì nếu
bạn đã mất cân bằng thì bạn đã có
một số tiềm năng để làm những gì xấu trong
một hệ vật lý là cân bằng vì
nếu một hệ thống vật lý hoàn hảo
trạng thái cân bằng sẽ không thể

French: 
uniquement sur un produit chimique physique ou
propriété thermodynamique sa mathématique
l'entropie tire sa vérité de la probabilité
théorie toutes les configurations ordonnées sont
moins probable que les désordonnés que
cela signifie-t-il que je vais en faire
simple s'il vous plaît ne me retenez pas dans le
Q & A si je dois devenir plus complexe mais
voici la pensée de base si vous êtes
regarder le déséquilibre thermodynamique
est bon dans un système physique parce que si
vous avez diséquilibre alors vous avez
un potentiel pour faire le travail ce qui est mauvais
un système physique est en équilibre parce que
si un système physique est parfait
l'équilibre ne va pas pouvoir

French: 
faire des travaux si nous aimons le déséquilibre de
température nous aimons les étoiles chaudes et froides
l'espace qui est bon déséquilibre il y a
va être un travail qui sort de cette
nous aimons le déséquilibre de la particule
déséquilibre de distribution de la pression
tous les déséquilibres sont grands et nous
appelez l'ordre de déséquilibre et c'est un
Ce qui est merveilleux mais le déséquilibre est
équilibre très très improbable est
toujours plus probable chaque système est
tendant vers l'équilibre finalement
tous les endroits chauds et froids sont
va même à un endroit chaud de
température égale finalement tous ceux
déséquilibre de la particule
Distribution
ils finissent par trouver leur

English: 
do any work so we like disequilibrium of
temperature we like hot stars and cold
space that's good disequilibrium there's
going to be some work coming out of that
we like disequilibrium of particle
distribution disequilibrium of pressure
all dis equilibriums are great and we
call disequilibrium order and that's a
wonderful thing but disequilibrium is
very very improbable equilibrium is
always more probable every system is
tending toward equilibrium eventually
all the hot places and cold places are
going to even out to a warm place of
equal temperature eventually all those
particle disequilibrium the particle
distribution
they're kind of eventually find their

Spanish: 
hacemos cualquier trabajo por lo que nos gusta el desequilibrio de
A la temperatura nos gustan las estrellas calientes y el frío.
espacio que hay buen desequilibrio hay
va a haber algún trabajo que salga de eso
Nos gusta el desequilibrio de partícula.
desequilibrio de distribucion de presion
Todos los desequilibrios son grandes y nosotros
orden de desequilibrio de llamadas y eso es una
Lo maravilloso, pero el desequilibrio es
el equilibrio muy, muy improbable es
Siempre es más probable que todo sistema sea
tendiendo hacia el equilibrio con el tiempo
Todos los lugares calientes y fríos son
ir a un lugar cálido de
igual temperatura eventualmente todos aquellos
desequilibrio de partículas la partícula
distribución
eventualmente encuentran su

Vietnamese: 
làm bất kỳ công việc nào để chúng tôi thích sự mất cân bằng của
nhiệt độ chúng ta thích sao nóng và lạnh
không gian đó mất cân bằng tốt
sẽ có một số công việc ra khỏi đó
chúng tôi thích sự mất cân bằng của hạt
sự mất cân bằng phân phối của áp lực
tất cả các trạng thái cân bằng là tuyệt vời và chúng tôi
gọi thứ tự mất cân bằng và đó là một
điều tuyệt vời nhưng mất cân bằng là
trạng thái cân bằng rất rất không khả thi là
luôn luôn có nhiều khả năng hơn mọi hệ thống
cuối cùng có xu hướng cân bằng
tất cả những nơi nóng và lạnh
thậm chí đi đến một nơi ấm áp của
cuối cùng nhiệt độ
hạt không cân bằng hạt
phân phối
cuối cùng họ cũng tìm thấy

English: 
way back to equilibrium eventually all
the pressure this equaling to find their
way back to equilibrium so here just
think about it this way for just two
seconds every physical system needs some
discipline some order in order to do
physical work but every time a physical
system does some work it uses up a
little bit of its disequilibrium never
comes back with the same amount of
disequilibrium that it had before it
loses a little bit of its order and
losing a little bit of its order it
loses a little bit of its potential for
work and it isn't going to go backwards
for purely probabilistic reasons the
odds against this happening over the it
could go back for a split second it
could go back from disorder to order but
over the long term disorder will always

Vietnamese: 
way back to equilibrium eventually all
the pressure this equaling to find their
way back to equilibrium so here just
think about it this way for just two
seconds every physical system needs some
discipline some order in order to do
physical work but every time a physical
system does some work it uses up a
little bit of its disequilibrium never
comes back with the same amount of
disequilibrium that it had before it
loses a little bit of its order and
losing a little bit of its order it
loses a little bit of its potential for
work and it isn't going to go backwards
for purely probabilistic reasons the
odds against this happening over the it
could go back for a split second it
could go back from disorder to order but
over the long term disorder will always

Spanish: 
camino de regreso al equilibrio con el tiempo
the pressure this equaling to find their
way back to equilibrium so here just
think about it this way for just two
seconds every physical system needs some
discipline some order in order to do
physical work but every time a physical
system does some work it uses up a
little bit of its disequilibrium never
comes back with the same amount of
disequilibrium that it had before it
loses a little bit of its order and
losing a little bit of its order it
loses a little bit of its potential for
work and it isn't going to go backwards
for purely probabilistic reasons the
odds against this happening over the it
could go back for a split second it
could go back from disorder to order but
over the long term disorder will always

French: 
chemin du retour à l'équilibre finalement tous
the pressure this equaling to find their
way back to equilibrium so here just
think about it this way for just two
seconds every physical system needs some
discipline some order in order to do
physical work but every time a physical
system does some work it uses up a
little bit of its disequilibrium never
comes back with the same amount of
disequilibrium that it had before it
loses a little bit of its order and
losing a little bit of its order it
loses a little bit of its potential for
work and it isn't going to go backwards
for purely probabilistic reasons the
odds against this happening over the it
could go back for a split second it
could go back from disorder to order but
over the long term disorder will always

English: 
win out over the long term equilibrium
will always win out now let's suppose
that the universe which stated note
standard Big Bang model is a physical
system and it is a physical system and
let's suppose that the universe has been
working working working working working
over the 13.8 billion years of its
existence Suns have been burning planets
have been forming and physicists have
been thinking about it energy has been
right physical forces been used up we're
always moving then from a state of form
a state of order to disorder are you
with me what if the universe had lasted
for an infinite amount of time let's
suppose it was a bouncing universe and
just kept going back infinite or let's
suppose it had a multiverse and the
multiverse that had been around for an

French: 
win out over the long term equilibrium
will always win out now let's suppose
that the universe which stated note
standard Big Bang model is a physical
system and it is a physical system and
let's suppose that the universe has been
working working working working working
over the 13.8 billion years of its
existence Suns have been burning planets
have been forming and physicists have
been thinking about it energy has been
right physical forces been used up we're
always moving then from a state of form
a state of order to disorder are you
with me what if the universe had lasted
for an infinite amount of time let's
suppose it was a bouncing universe and
just kept going back infinite or let's
suppose it had a multiverse and the
multiverse that had been around for an

Spanish: 
win out over the long term equilibrium
will always win out now let's suppose
that the universe which stated note
standard Big Bang model is a physical
system and it is a physical system and
let's suppose that the universe has been
trabajando trabajando trabajando trabajando trabajando trabajando
over the 13.8 billion years of its
existence Suns have been burning planets
have been forming and physicists have
been thinking about it energy has been
right physical forces been used up we're
always moving then from a state of form
a state of order to disorder are you
with me what if the universe had lasted
for an infinite amount of time let's
suppose it was a bouncing universe and
just kept going back infinite or let's
suppose it had a multiverse and the
multiverse that had been around for an

Vietnamese: 
win out over the long term equilibrium
will always win out now let's suppose
that the universe which stated note
standard Big Bang model is a physical
system and it is a physical system and
let's suppose that the universe has been
working working working working working
over the 13.8 billion years of its
existence Suns have been burning planets
have been forming and physicists have
been thinking about it energy has been
right physical forces been used up we're
always moving then from a state of form
a state of order to disorder are you
with me what if the universe had lasted
for an infinite amount of time let's
suppose it was a bouncing universe and
just kept going back infinite or let's
suppose it had a multiverse and the
multiverse that had been around for an

French: 
infinite amount of time let's suppose
that you had any physical system that
was operating over an infinite amount of
time technically speaking the universe
should
a dead universe today it shouldn't have
any disequilibrium left in it and even
shouldn't have any disequilibrium per
cubic area in it for all intents and
purposes it should be a dead universe
today now they're couple of guys who are
trying to get out of this with some very
very fancy inflationary footwork but for
all intents and purposes none of that
has been verified what we're left with
is just plain old second law of
thermodynamics which makes it look like
this universe or any other physical

Vietnamese: 
infinite amount of time let's suppose
that you had any physical system that
was operating over an infinite amount of
time technically speaking the universe
Nên
a dead universe today it shouldn't have
any disequilibrium left in it and even
shouldn't have any disequilibrium per
cubic area in it for all intents and
purposes it should be a dead universe
today now they're couple of guys who are
trying to get out of this with some very
very fancy inflationary footwork but for
all intents and purposes none of that
has been verified what we're left with
is just plain old second law of
thermodynamics which makes it look like
this universe or any other physical

Spanish: 
infinite amount of time let's suppose
that you had any physical system that
was operating over an infinite amount of
time technically speaking the universe
debería
a dead universe today it shouldn't have
any disequilibrium left in it and even
shouldn't have any disequilibrium per
cubic area in it for all intents and
purposes it should be a dead universe
today now they're couple of guys who are
trying to get out of this with some very
very fancy inflationary footwork but for
all intents and purposes none of that
has been verified what we're left with
is just plain old second law of
thermodynamics which makes it look like
this universe or any other physical

English: 
infinite amount of time let's suppose
that you had any physical system that
was operating over an infinite amount of
time technically speaking the universe
should
a dead universe today it shouldn't have
any disequilibrium left in it and even
shouldn't have any disequilibrium per
cubic area in it for all intents and
purposes it should be a dead universe
today now they're couple of guys who are
trying to get out of this with some very
very fancy inflationary footwork but for
all intents and purposes none of that
has been verified what we're left with
is just plain old second law of
thermodynamics which makes it look like
this universe or any other physical

Vietnamese: 
system would run out of the capacity to
do work if the universe had been around
for an infinite amount of time and if
the universe therefore has only been
around or a multiverse has only been
around for a finite amount of time what
does it have a beginning these two
points are actually very interesting and
dr. Alexander Vilenkin weaves them
together in a comprehensive theory but
basically these are two wonderful data
sets because they have such vast
applicability such Universal
applicability right the BBG theorem
applies to any physical system it
doesn't matter what it is so long as the
expansion reads greater than zero it
applies and of course the entropy
applies to any physical system which is
dependent upon disequilibrium and of
course the use of use of that order in
order to do work which means of course

French: 
system would run out of the capacity to
do work if the universe had been around
for an infinite amount of time and if
the universe therefore has only been
around or a multiverse has only been
around for a finite amount of time what
does it have a beginning these two
points are actually very interesting and
dr. Alexander Vilenkin weaves them
together in a comprehensive theory but
basically these are two wonderful data
sets because they have such vast
applicability such Universal
applicability right the BBG theorem
applies to any physical system it
doesn't matter what it is so long as the
expansion reads greater than zero it
applies and of course the entropy
applies to any physical system which is
dependent upon disequilibrium and of
course the use of use of that order in
order to do work which means of course

English: 
system would run out of the capacity to
do work if the universe had been around
for an infinite amount of time and if
the universe therefore has only been
around or a multiverse has only been
around for a finite amount of time what
does it have a beginning these two
points are actually very interesting and
dr. Alexander Vilenkin weaves them
together in a comprehensive theory but
basically these are two wonderful data
sets because they have such vast
applicability such Universal
applicability right the BBG theorem
applies to any physical system it
doesn't matter what it is so long as the
expansion reads greater than zero it
applies and of course the entropy
applies to any physical system which is
dependent upon disequilibrium and of
course the use of use of that order in
order to do work which means of course

Spanish: 
system would run out of the capacity to
do work if the universe had been around
for an infinite amount of time and if
the universe therefore has only been
around or a multiverse has only been
around for a finite amount of time what
does it have a beginning these two
points are actually very interesting and
Dr. Alexander Vilenkin weaves them
together in a comprehensive theory but
basically these are two wonderful data
sets because they have such vast
applicability such Universal
applicability right the BBG theorem
applies to any physical system it
doesn't matter what it is so long as the
expansion reads greater than zero it
applies and of course the entropy
applies to any physical system which is
dependent upon disequilibrium and of
course the use of use of that order in
order to do work which means of course

Vietnamese: 
that is eventually going to reach
equilibrium it's vastly applicable and
both of these datasets from two
different perspectives are pointing at
the same thing not just our universe but
all known physical configurations for a
multiverse a higher dimensional space
universe a bouncing universe
they must all
have a beginning Wow
that's a very interesting thought so
interesting that dr. Alexander Lincoln
in 2006 put it this way it's up there on
the screen I'll just paraphrase it it is
said that a good argument will convince
a reasonable person and that a proof
will convince even an unreasonable one
well now that the proof is in place and
the proof of course is aboard of Lincoln
and Guth proof combined with the entropy

Spanish: 
that is eventually going to reach
equilibrium it's vastly applicable and
both of these datasets from two
different perspectives are pointing at
the same thing not just our universe but
all known physical configurations for a
multiverse a higher dimensional space
universe a bouncing universe
they must all
have a beginning Wow
that's a very interesting thought so
interesting that dr. Alexander Lincoln
in 2006 put it this way it's up there on
the screen I'll just paraphrase it it is
said that a good argument will convince
a reasonable person and that a proof
will convince even an unreasonable one
well now that the proof is in place and
the proof of course is aboard of Lincoln
and Guth proof combined with the entropy

French: 
that is eventually going to reach
equilibrium it's vastly applicable and
both of these datasets from two
different perspectives are pointing at
the same thing not just our universe but
all known physical configurations for a
multiverse a higher dimensional space
universe a bouncing universe
they must all
have a beginning Wow
that's a very interesting thought so
interesting that dr. Alexander Lincoln
in 2006 put it this way it's up there on
the screen I'll just paraphrase it it is
said that a good argument will convince
a reasonable person and that a proof
will convince even an unreasonable one
well now that the proof is in place and
the proof of course is aboard of Lincoln
and Guth proof combined with the entropy

English: 
that is eventually going to reach
equilibrium it's vastly applicable and
both of these datasets from two
different perspectives are pointing at
the same thing not just our universe but
all known physical configurations for a
multiverse a higher dimensional space
universe a bouncing universe
they must all
have a beginning Wow
that's a very interesting thought so
interesting that dr. Alexander Lincoln
in 2006 put it this way it's up there on
the screen I'll just paraphrase it it is
said that a good argument will convince
a reasonable person and that a proof
will convince even an unreasonable one
well now that the proof is in place and
the proof of course is aboard of Lincoln
and Guth proof combined with the entropy

English: 
evidence now that the proof is in place
cosmologists no longer have the
possibility of a past eternal universe
there is no escape
they must confront the reality of a
beginning that's a bold statement for a
physicist
they must confront the reality of a
beginning no wonder there's much ado
about nothing let us review this for a
moment because if there is a beginning
not just of our universe but of a
multiverse a higher dimensional space
universe a bouncing universe and of
course a static universe is an
impossibility because it's a
contradiction if there really is a
beginning of physical reality and it
sure looks like that's a very good
possibility let's even call it highly
probable if there is a beginning then
prior to that beginning prior to the

Spanish: 
evidence now that the proof is in place
cosmologists no longer have the
possibility of a past eternal universe
there is no escape
they must confront the reality of a
beginning that's a bold statement for a
physicist
they must confront the reality of a
beginning no wonder there's much ado
about nothing let us review this for a
moment because if there is a beginning
not just of our universe but of a
multiverse a higher dimensional space
universe a bouncing universe and of
course a static universe is an
impossibility because it's a
contradiction if there really is a
beginning of physical reality and it
sure looks like that's a very good
possibility let's even call it highly
probable if there is a beginning then
prior to that beginning prior to the

French: 
evidence now that the proof is in place
cosmologists no longer have the
possibility of a past eternal universe
there is no escape
they must confront the reality of a
beginning that's a bold statement for a
physicist
they must confront the reality of a
beginning no wonder there's much ado
about nothing let us review this for a
moment because if there is a beginning
not just of our universe but of a
multiverse a higher dimensional space
universe a bouncing universe and of
course a static universe is an
impossibility because it's a
contradiction if there really is a
beginning of physical reality and it
sure looks like that's a very good
possibility let's even call it highly
probable if there is a beginning then
prior to that beginning prior to the

Vietnamese: 
evidence now that the proof is in place
cosmologists no longer have the
possibility of a past eternal universe
there is no escape
they must confront the reality of a
beginning that's a bold statement for a
physicist
they must confront the reality of a
beginning no wonder there's much ado
about nothing let us review this for a
moment because if there is a beginning
not just of our universe but of a
multiverse a higher dimensional space
universe a bouncing universe and of
course a static universe is an
impossibility because it's a
contradiction if there really is a
beginning of physical reality and it
sure looks like that's a very good
possibility let's even call it highly
probable if there is a beginning then
prior to that beginning prior to the

Vietnamese: 
beginning of physical space and time
itself physical reality was nothing and
if physical reality was nothing then it
could only do nothing and if it could
only do nothing then it could never have
moved itself from nothing to something
because it was nothing and could only do
nothing and which case something else
had to do it and that something else has
to be transcendent of our universe and
physical reality itself not only
transcendent of physical reality itself
but have the power to
the whole of physical reality with its
space and time its laws and structures
and everything in one single blinding
Universal creative moment
sounds like a creator to me for that

French: 
beginning of physical space and time
itself physical reality was nothing and
if physical reality was nothing then it
could only do nothing and if it could
only do nothing then it could never have
moved itself from nothing to something
because it was nothing and could only do
nothing and which case something else
had to do it and that something else has
to be transcendent of our universe and
physical reality itself not only
transcendent of physical reality itself
but have the power to
the whole of physical reality with its
space and time its laws and structures
and everything in one single blinding
Universal creative moment
sounds like a creator to me for that

English: 
beginning of physical space and time
itself physical reality was nothing and
if physical reality was nothing then it
could only do nothing and if it could
only do nothing then it could never have
moved itself from nothing to something
because it was nothing and could only do
nothing and which case something else
had to do it and that something else has
to be transcendent of our universe and
physical reality itself not only
transcendent of physical reality itself
but have the power to
the whole of physical reality with its
space and time its laws and structures
and everything in one single blinding
Universal creative moment
sounds like a creator to me for that

Spanish: 
beginning of physical space and time
itself physical reality was nothing and
if physical reality was nothing then it
could only do nothing and if it could
only do nothing then it could never have
moved itself from nothing to something
because it was nothing and could only do
nothing and which case something else
had to do it and that something else has
to be transcendent of our universe and
physical reality itself not only
transcendent of physical reality itself
but have the power to
the whole of physical reality with its
space and time its laws and structures
and everything in one single blinding
Universal creative moment
sounds like a creator to me for that

Spanish: 
reason I think many physicists rightly
so are believers not just because of
their faith they really do think that
the creation possibility is just as
reasonable and responsible if not more
reasonable and responsible than any
other physical theory for the origins of
physical reality itself I'm not kidding
you take Alexander for Lincoln at his
word but it gets even more interesting
then you've got the component of is this
creative force outside of universal or
outside of physical reality is that
creative force intelligent or not are
you guys hanging in there okay sort of
get it a little bit good well it's
fascinating anyway okay the main point
of course is fine tuning of the universe

French: 
reason I think many physicists rightly
so are believers not just because of
their faith they really do think that
the creation possibility is just as
reasonable and responsible if not more
reasonable and responsible than any
other physical theory for the origins of
physical reality itself I'm not kidding
you take Alexander for Lincoln at his
word but it gets even more interesting
then you've got the component of is this
creative force outside of universal or
outside of physical reality is that
creative force intelligent or not are
you guys hanging in there okay sort of
get it a little bit good well it's
fascinating anyway okay the main point
of course is fine tuning of the universe

Vietnamese: 
reason I think many physicists rightly
so are believers not just because of
their faith they really do think that
the creation possibility is just as
reasonable and responsible if not more
reasonable and responsible than any
other physical theory for the origins of
physical reality itself I'm not kidding
you take Alexander for Lincoln at his
word but it gets even more interesting
then you've got the component of is this
creative force outside of universal or
outside of physical reality is that
creative force intelligent or not are
you guys hanging in there okay sort of
get it a little bit good well it's
fascinating anyway okay the main point
of course is fine tuning of the universe

English: 
reason I think many physicists rightly
so are believers not just because of
their faith they really do think that
the creation possibility is just as
reasonable and responsible if not more
reasonable and responsible than any
other physical theory for the origins of
physical reality itself I'm not kidding
you take Alexander for Lincoln at his
word but it gets even more interesting
then you've got the component of is this
creative force outside of universal or
outside of physical reality is that
creative force intelligent or not are
you guys hanging in there okay sort of
get it a little bit good well it's
fascinating anyway okay the main point
of course is fine tuning of the universe

Vietnamese: 
that begins to add an whole other
component to this universe let's just go
through really quickly some of these
things here's the main thing to remember
a fine-tuning coincidence is something
which is required required for any life
form to exist in the universe and
generally physicists point these flying
tuning coincidences we talk about them
in terms of the Big Bang itself we don't
want to have talked about physical
coincidences or flying tuning
coincidences that exist after the Big
Bang because somebody some scientists
could come along and say well that's
explicable in terms of physical forces
that we haven't yet discovered the good
point about just getting everything back
to the Big Bang
is there isn't any moment before the Big
Bang everything prior to the Big Bang is
causally disconnected from everything

French: 
that begins to add an whole other
component to this universe let's just go
through really quickly some of these
things here's the main thing to remember
a fine-tuning coincidence is something
which is required required for any life
form to exist in the universe and
generally physicists point these flying
tuning coincidences we talk about them
in terms of the Big Bang itself we don't
want to have talked about physical
coincidences or flying tuning
coincidences that exist after the Big
Bang because somebody some scientists
could come along and say well that's
explicable in terms of physical forces
that we haven't yet discovered the good
point about just getting everything back
to the Big Bang
is there isn't any moment before the Big
Bang everything prior to the Big Bang is
causally disconnected from everything

English: 
that begins to add an whole other
component to this universe let's just go
through really quickly some of these
things here's the main thing to remember
a fine-tuning coincidence is something
which is required required for any life
form to exist in the universe and
generally physicists point these flying
tuning coincidences we talk about them
in terms of the Big Bang itself we don't
want to have talked about physical
coincidences or flying tuning
coincidences that exist after the Big
Bang because somebody some scientists
could come along and say well that's
explicable in terms of physical forces
that we haven't yet discovered the good
point about just getting everything back
to the Big Bang
is there isn't any moment before the Big
Bang everything prior to the Big Bang is
causally disconnected from everything

Spanish: 
that begins to add an whole other
component to this universe let's just go
through really quickly some of these
things here's the main thing to remember
a fine-tuning coincidence is something
which is required required for any life
form to exist in the universe and
generally physicists point these flying
tuning coincidences we talk about them
in terms of the Big Bang itself we don't
want to have talked about physical
coincidences or flying tuning
coincidences that exist after the Big
Bang because somebody some scientists
could come along and say well that's
explicable in terms of physical forces
that we haven't yet discovered the good
point about just getting everything back
to the Big Bang
is there isn't any moment before the Big
Bang everything prior to the Big Bang is
causally disconnected from everything

Vietnamese: 
after the Big Bang you can't appeal to a
prior causation a prior physical
causation to explain the anthropic or
the fine-tuning coincidence this makes
it very interesting we're gonna give
some examples in a moment well let's
take an example right now low entropy at
the beginning of our universe low
entropy at the Big Bang remember you
need low entropy you need lots of
disequilibrium right low entropy means
dis equal of disick high entropy
equilibrium universe can't do anything
you need low entropy at the Big Bang for
any life-form to develop and for any
life-form to be maintained and to evolve
you can't have a life-form if the
universe can't do anything you got a

Spanish: 
after the Big Bang you can't appeal to a
prior causation a prior physical
causation to explain the anthropic or
the fine-tuning coincidence this makes
it very interesting we're gonna give
some examples in a moment well let's
take an example right now low entropy at
the beginning of our universe low
entropy at the Big Bang remember you
need low entropy you need lots of
disequilibrium right low entropy means
dis equal of disick high entropy
equilibrium universe can't do anything
you need low entropy at the Big Bang for
any life-form to develop and for any
life-form to be maintained and to evolve
you can't have a life-form if the
universe can't do anything you got a

English: 
after the Big Bang you can't appeal to a
prior causation a prior physical
causation to explain the anthropic or
the fine-tuning coincidence this makes
it very interesting we're gonna give
some examples in a moment well let's
take an example right now low entropy at
the beginning of our universe low
entropy at the Big Bang remember you
need low entropy you need lots of
disequilibrium right low entropy means
dis equal of disick high entropy
equilibrium universe can't do anything
you need low entropy at the Big Bang for
any life-form to develop and for any
life-form to be maintained and to evolve
you can't have a life-form if the
universe can't do anything you got a

French: 
after the Big Bang you can't appeal to a
prior causation a prior physical
causation to explain the anthropic or
the fine-tuning coincidence this makes
it very interesting we're gonna give
some examples in a moment well let's
take an example right now low entropy at
the beginning of our universe low
entropy at the Big Bang remember you
need low entropy you need lots of
disequilibrium right low entropy means
dis equal of disick high entropy
equilibrium universe can't do anything
you need low entropy at the Big Bang for
any life-form to develop and for any
life-form to be maintained and to evolve
you can't have a life-form if the
universe can't do anything you got a

Vietnamese: 
high entropy universe it's all over sort
of get it do you know what the odds of
low entropy at the Big Bang in our
universe is well this physicist dr.
Roger Penrose went ahead and calculated
it very fine physicists at Oxford there
and this it's by the way it's not a hard
calculation all you need to do is take
the total number of baryons let's say
it's 10 to the 80th and you multiply it
by the entropy per baryon right and you
basically ten to the 43rd and and you
write you just add your exponents and
you get 10 to the 123 and that's the
total amount of entropy in our universe
and all you have to do is take the
exponential of that right in order to
get what the odds are 10 raised to the
10 raised to the 123 to 1 that's the
odds against having low entropy

French: 
high entropy universe it's all over sort
of get it do you know what the odds of
low entropy at the Big Bang in our
universe is well this physicist dr.
Roger Penrose went ahead and calculated
it very fine physicists at Oxford there
and this it's by the way it's not a hard
calculation all you need to do is take
the total number of baryons let's say
it's 10 to the 80th and you multiply it
by the entropy per baryon right and you
basically ten to the 43rd and and you
write you just add your exponents and
you get 10 to the 123 and that's the
total amount of entropy in our universe
and all you have to do is take the
exponential of that right in order to
get what the odds are 10 raised to the
10 raised to the 123 to 1 that's the
odds against having low entropy

Spanish: 
high entropy universe it's all over sort
of get it do you know what the odds of
low entropy at the Big Bang in our
universe is well this physicist dr.
Roger Penrose went ahead and calculated
it very fine physicists at Oxford there
and this it's by the way it's not a hard
calculation all you need to do is take
the total number of baryons let's say
it's 10 to the 80th and you multiply it
by the entropy per baryon right and you
basically ten to the 43rd and and you
write you just add your exponents and
you get 10 to the 123 and that's the
total amount of entropy in our universe
and all you have to do is take the
exponential of that right in order to
get what the odds are 10 raised to the
10 raised to the 123 to 1 that's the
odds against having low entropy

English: 
high entropy universe it's all over sort
of get it do you know what the odds of
low entropy at the Big Bang in our
universe is well this physicist dr.
Roger Penrose went ahead and calculated
it very fine physicists at Oxford there
and this it's by the way it's not a hard
calculation all you need to do is take
the total number of baryons let's say
it's 10 to the 80th and you multiply it
by the entropy per baryon right and you
basically ten to the 43rd and and you
write you just add your exponents and
you get 10 to the 123 and that's the
total amount of entropy in our universe
and all you have to do is take the
exponential of that right in order to
get what the odds are 10 raised to the
10 raised to the 123 to 1 that's the
odds against having low entropy

Spanish: 
absolutely necessary for any life-form
to develop in our universe that's the
odds against
entropy at our universe at the Big Bang
ten said double x1 and everybody raised
to the ten raised again to the one
twenty three to one against do you know
what that number is like that's a ten
and then in the exponent you have a one
followed by a hundred and twenty three
zeroes in the exponent the exponent is a
trillion trillion trillion trillion
trillion trillion trillion trillion
trillion trillion trillion trillion
trillion trillion trillion trillion in
the exponent if you try to write that
number out without exponential notation
where every zero was 10-point type our
solar system compatible that number it
is the same probability of a monkey
typing the entire corpus of Shakespeare
by random tapping of the keys in a

French: 
absolutely necessary for any life-form
to develop in our universe that's the
odds against
entropy at our universe at the Big Bang
ten said double x1 and everybody raised
to the ten raised again to the one
twenty three to one against do you know
what that number is like that's a ten
and then in the exponent you have a one
followed by a hundred and twenty three
zeroes in the exponent the exponent is a
trillion trillion trillion trillion
trillion trillion trillion trillion
trillion trillion trillion trillion
trillion trillion trillion trillion in
the exponent if you try to write that
number out without exponential notation
where every zero was 10-point type our
solar system compatible that number it
is the same probability of a monkey
typing the entire corpus of Shakespeare
by random tapping of the keys in a

English: 
absolutely necessary for any life-form
to develop in our universe that's the
odds against
entropy at our universe at the Big Bang
ten said double x1 and everybody raised
to the ten raised again to the one
twenty three to one against do you know
what that number is like that's a ten
and then in the exponent you have a one
followed by a hundred and twenty three
zeroes in the exponent the exponent is a
trillion trillion trillion trillion
trillion trillion trillion trillion
trillion trillion trillion trillion
trillion trillion trillion trillion in
the exponent if you try to write that
number out without exponential notation
where every zero was 10-point type our
solar system compatible that number it
is the same probability of a monkey
typing the entire corpus of Shakespeare
by random tapping of the keys in a

Vietnamese: 
absolutely necessary for any life-form
to develop in our universe that's the
odds against
entropy at our universe at the Big Bang
ten said double x1 and everybody raised
to the ten raised again to the one
twenty three to one against do you know
what that number is like that's a ten
and then in the exponent you have a one
followed by a hundred and twenty three
zeroes in the exponent the exponent is a
trillion trillion trillion trillion
trillion trillion trillion trillion
trillion trillion trillion trillion
trillion trillion trillion trillion in
the exponent if you try to write that
number out without exponential notation
where every zero was 10-point type our
solar system compatible that number it
is the same probability of a monkey
typing the entire corpus of Shakespeare
by random tapping of the keys in a

French: 
single try this is highly improbable I
mean basically you come to the monkey
and you go I want the corpus of
Shakespeare the monkey you know eeek
eeeek Apple II you know he begins
randomly tapping on the keys right you
come back a few weeks later and there's
Macbeth in perfect folio condition then
you begin to think well that's highly
improbable
and then there's Richard the third again
it's done perfectly and you begin to
suspect perhaps someone who was a very
good knowledge of Shakespeare as well as
good typing ability has helped the
monkey in my absence that's the odds of
having low entropy the Big Bang
necessary for any life-form to develop
this is really hard to explain right
that much order in the universe is hard

Vietnamese: 
single try this is highly improbable I
mean basically you come to the monkey
and you go I want the corpus of
Shakespeare the monkey you know eeek
eeeek Apple II you know he begins
randomly tapping on the keys right you
come back a few weeks later and there's
Macbeth in perfect folio condition then
you begin to think well that's highly
improbable
and then there's Richard the third again
it's done perfectly and you begin to
suspect perhaps someone who was a very
good knowledge of Shakespeare as well as
good typing ability has helped the
monkey in my absence that's the odds of
having low entropy the Big Bang
necessary for any life-form to develop
this is really hard to explain right
that much order in the universe is hard

English: 
single try this is highly improbable I
mean basically you come to the monkey
and you go I want the corpus of
Shakespeare the monkey you know eeek
eeeek Apple II you know he begins
randomly tapping on the keys right you
come back a few weeks later and there's
Macbeth in perfect folio condition then
you begin to think well that's highly
improbable
and then there's Richard the third again
it's done perfectly and you begin to
suspect perhaps someone who was a very
good knowledge of Shakespeare as well as
good typing ability has helped the
monkey in my absence that's the odds of
having low entropy the Big Bang
necessary for any life-form to develop
this is really hard to explain right
that much order in the universe is hard

Spanish: 
single try this is highly improbable I
mean basically you come to the monkey
and you go I want the corpus of
Shakespeare the monkey you know eeek
eeeek Apple II you know he begins
randomly tapping on the keys right you
come back a few weeks later and there's
Macbeth in perfect folio condition then
you begin to think well that's highly
improbable
and then there's Richard the third again
it's done perfectly and you begin to
suspect perhaps someone who was a very
good knowledge of Shakespeare as well as
good typing ability has helped the
monkey in my absence that's the odds of
having low entropy the Big Bang
necessary for any life-form to develop
this is really hard to explain right
that much order in the universe is hard

French: 
to explain I'll give you just a few
other examples and you'll get the point
back to the Big Bang we have 20
constants in our universe a constant is
a number it's a number that remains cons
throughout time so his same in the past
gonna be same in the future 13.8 billion
years ago was this way it's going to be
13.8 billion years from now it's going
to maintain the same value it's
everywhere the same in the universe a
respect of a space and time the constant
remains the same what does the constant
do the constant is a number that allows
for the interaction between forces or
the interaction between space time and
and and and for those universal forces
so essentially constants are minimums
constants are maximums constants are
ratios constants are absolute numbers

Vietnamese: 
to explain I'll give you just a few
other examples and you'll get the point
back to the Big Bang we have 20
constants in our universe a constant is
a number it's a number that remains cons
throughout time so his same in the past
gonna be same in the future 13.8 billion
years ago was this way it's going to be
13.8 billion years from now it's going
to maintain the same value it's
everywhere the same in the universe a
respect of a space and time the constant
remains the same what does the constant
do the constant is a number that allows
for the interaction between forces or
the interaction between space time and
and and and for those universal forces
so essentially constants are minimums
constants are maximums constants are
ratios constants are absolute numbers

English: 
to explain I'll give you just a few
other examples and you'll get the point
back to the Big Bang we have 20
constants in our universe a constant is
a number it's a number that remains cons
throughout time so his same in the past
gonna be same in the future 13.8 billion
years ago was this way it's going to be
13.8 billion years from now it's going
to maintain the same value it's
everywhere the same in the universe a
respect of a space and time the constant
remains the same what does the constant
do the constant is a number that allows
for the interaction between forces or
the interaction between space time and
and and and for those universal forces
so essentially constants are minimums
constants are maximums constants are
ratios constants are absolute numbers

Spanish: 
to explain I'll give you just a few
other examples and you'll get the point
back to the Big Bang we have 20
constants in our universe a constant is
a number it's a number that remains cons
throughout time so his same in the past
gonna be same in the future 13.8 billion
years ago was this way it's going to be
13.8 billion years from now it's going
to maintain the same value it's
everywhere the same in the universe a
respect of a space and time the constant
remains the same what does the constant
do the constant is a number that allows
for the interaction between forces or
the interaction between space time and
and and and for those universal forces
so essentially constants are minimums
constants are maximums constants are
ratios constants are absolute numbers

English: 
etc so for examples of the 20 constants
the speed of light constant right I
think everybody knows the speed of light
is constant throughout the universe
186,000 200 miles per second 300,000
kilometers per second right that's
that's a constant we have four forces in
our universe right we have
electromagnetic force who have the
gravitational force the strong nuclear
force and the weak force and each of
those forces has constants attached to
it so the gravitational force has the
gravitational constant right and that's
a very defined constants of air defined
number the weak force has the weak force
constant the strong nuclear force has
the strong nuclear force coupling
constant and the electromagnetic force
has three constants attached to it the
mass of the proton the mass of the
electron and the electromagnetic charge
and then you have Hubble's constant the
cosmological constant there's 20 of

Spanish: 
etc so for examples of the 20 constants
the speed of light constant right I
think everybody knows the speed of light
is constant throughout the universe
186,000 200 miles per second 300,000
kilometers per second right that's
that's a constant we have four forces in
our universe right we have
electromagnetic force who have the
gravitational force the strong nuclear
force and the weak force and each of
those forces has constants attached to
it so the gravitational force has the
gravitational constant right and that's
a very defined constants of air defined
number the weak force has the weak force
constant the strong nuclear force has
the strong nuclear force coupling
constant and the electromagnetic force
has three constants attached to it the
mass of the proton the mass of the
electron and the electromagnetic charge
and then you have Hubble's constant the
cosmological constant there's 20 of

French: 
etc so for examples of the 20 constants
the speed of light constant right I
think everybody knows the speed of light
is constant throughout the universe
186,000 200 miles per second 300,000
kilometers per second right that's
that's a constant we have four forces in
our universe right we have
electromagnetic force who have the
gravitational force the strong nuclear
force and the weak force and each of
those forces has constants attached to
it so the gravitational force has the
gravitational constant right and that's
a very defined constants of air defined
number the weak force has the weak force
constant the strong nuclear force has
the strong nuclear force coupling
constant and the electromagnetic force
has three constants attached to it the
mass of the proton the mass of the
electron and the electromagnetic charge
and then you have Hubble's constant the
cosmological constant there's 20 of

Vietnamese: 
etc so for examples of the 20 constants
the speed of light constant right I
think everybody knows the speed of light
is constant throughout the universe
186,000 200 miles per second 300,000
kilometers per second right that's
that's a constant we have four forces in
our universe right we have
electromagnetic force who have the
gravitational force the strong nuclear
force and the weak force and each of
those forces has constants attached to
it so the gravitational force has the
gravitational constant right and that's
a very defined constants of air defined
number the weak force has the weak force
constant the strong nuclear force has
the strong nuclear force coupling
constant and the electromagnetic force
has three constants attached to it the
mass of the proton the mass of the
electron and the electromagnetic charge
and then you have Hubble's constant the
cosmological constant there's 20 of

French: 
those babies now here's the deal
everyone if you alter those constants by
just a little fraction higher or lower
at the Big Bang then life is impossible
it could have been any those constants
those 20 constants could have easily
been higher by a huge margin and could
have easily been lower by a huge margin
because there is not
things special about those constants
except the convergence of those
constants is necessary for life but it
doesn't make any one of them more
probable than the next and that's really
weird let's take some examples if you
altered the weak force constant or the
gravitational constant by only one part
in ten to the fiftieth you with me one

Spanish: 
those babies now here's the deal
everyone if you alter those constants by
just a little fraction higher or lower
at the Big Bang then life is impossible
it could have been any those constants
those 20 constants could have easily
been higher by a huge margin and could
have easily been lower by a huge margin
because there is not
things special about those constants
except the convergence of those
constants is necessary for life but it
doesn't make any one of them more
probable than the next and that's really
weird let's take some examples if you
altered the weak force constant or the
gravitational constant by only one part
in ten to the fiftieth you with me one

Vietnamese: 
those babies now here's the deal
everyone if you alter those constants by
just a little fraction higher or lower
at the Big Bang then life is impossible
it could have been any those constants
those 20 constants could have easily
been higher by a huge margin and could
have easily been lower by a huge margin
because there is not
things special about those constants
except the convergence of those
constants is necessary for life but it
doesn't make any one of them more
probable than the next and that's really
weird let's take some examples if you
altered the weak force constant or the
gravitational constant by only one part
in ten to the fiftieth you with me one

English: 
those babies now here's the deal
everyone if you alter those constants by
just a little fraction higher or lower
at the Big Bang then life is impossible
it could have been any those constants
those 20 constants could have easily
been higher by a huge margin and could
have easily been lower by a huge margin
because there is not
things special about those constants
except the convergence of those
constants is necessary for life but it
doesn't make any one of them more
probable than the next and that's really
weird let's take some examples if you
altered the weak force constant or the
gravitational constant by only one part
in ten to the fiftieth you with me one

French: 
Partington that's like a decimal point
49 zeros and a one if you altered it by
one part in ten to the fiftieth higher
or lower than the value it just happened
to have add at the Big Bang then either
the universe would have continuously
exploded in its expansion cataclysmic
explosions throughout the 13.8 billion
years which by the way is very bad for
life Florence generates everything or
the universe would have collapsed back
into itself in essentially a
Schwarzschild black hole with the infant
with a matter density becoming almost
infinite which means infinite squishing
power which is really bad for life-forms
when the entire mass energy of the
universe is collapsed into 10 to the

Vietnamese: 
Partington that's like a decimal point
49 zeros and a one if you altered it by
one part in ten to the fiftieth higher
or lower than the value it just happened
to have add at the Big Bang then either
the universe would have continuously
exploded in its expansion cataclysmic
explosions throughout the 13.8 billion
years which by the way is very bad for
life Florence generates everything or
the universe would have collapsed back
into itself in essentially a
Schwarzschild black hole with the infant
with a matter density becoming almost
infinite which means infinite squishing
power which is really bad for life-forms
when the entire mass energy of the
universe is collapsed into 10 to the

Spanish: 
Partington that's like a decimal point
49 zeros and a one if you altered it by
one part in ten to the fiftieth higher
or lower than the value it just happened
to have add at the Big Bang then either
the universe would have continuously
exploded in its expansion cataclysmic
explosions throughout the 13.8 billion
years which by the way is very bad for
life Florence generates everything or
the universe would have collapsed back
into itself in essentially a
Schwarzschild black hole with the infant
with a matter density becoming almost
infinite which means infinite squishing
power which is really bad for life-forms
when the entire mass energy of the
universe is collapsed into 10 to the

English: 
Partington that's like a decimal point
49 zeros and a one if you altered it by
one part in ten to the fiftieth higher
or lower than the value it just happened
to have add at the Big Bang then either
the universe would have continuously
exploded in its expansion cataclysmic
explosions throughout the 13.8 billion
years which by the way is very bad for
life Florence generates everything or
the universe would have collapsed back
into itself in essentially a
Schwarzschild black hole with the infant
with a matter density becoming almost
infinite which means infinite squishing
power which is really bad for life-forms
when the entire mass energy of the
universe is collapsed into 10 to the

French: 
minus 33 centimeters life doesn't stand
a prayer you mean we avoided complete
cosmological disaster by a fraction of
one part in 10 to the 50th and these two
constants at the Big Bang do you know
the odds against those constants having
those precise values within that narrow
margin of error at the Big Bang by pure
chance monkeys typing Shakespeare again
same odds one monkey typing the corpus
of Shakespeare by pure chance oh by the
way if you all
the strong nuclear force coupling
constant you just made that two percent
higher the entire universe would be
hydrogen there would be no element
heavier than hydrogen possible and if
you made it two percent lower there

Spanish: 
minus 33 centimeters life doesn't stand
a prayer you mean we avoided complete
cosmological disaster by a fraction of
one part in 10 to the 50th and these two
constants at the Big Bang do you know
the odds against those constants having
those precise values within that narrow
margin of error at the Big Bang by pure
chance monkeys typing Shakespeare again
same odds one monkey typing the corpus
of Shakespeare by pure chance oh by the
way if you all
the strong nuclear force coupling
constant you just made that two percent
higher the entire universe would be
hydrogen there would be no element
heavier than hydrogen possible and if
you made it two percent lower there

English: 
minus 33 centimeters life doesn't stand
a prayer you mean we avoided complete
cosmological disaster by a fraction of
one part in 10 to the 50th and these two
constants at the Big Bang do you know
the odds against those constants having
those precise values within that narrow
margin of error at the Big Bang by pure
chance monkeys typing Shakespeare again
same odds one monkey typing the corpus
of Shakespeare by pure chance oh by the
way if you all
the strong nuclear force coupling
constant you just made that two percent
higher the entire universe would be
hydrogen there would be no element
heavier than hydrogen possible and if
you made it two percent lower there

Vietnamese: 
minus 33 centimeters life doesn't stand
a prayer you mean we avoided complete
cosmological disaster by a fraction of
one part in 10 to the 50th and these two
constants at the Big Bang do you know
the odds against those constants having
those precise values within that narrow
margin of error at the Big Bang by pure
chance monkeys typing Shakespeare again
same odds one monkey typing the corpus
of Shakespeare by pure chance oh by the
way if you all
the strong nuclear force coupling
constant you just made that two percent
higher the entire universe would be
hydrogen there would be no element
heavier than hydrogen possible and if
you made it two percent lower there

French: 
would be no hydrogen now if there's no
hydrogen I can assure you of this no
water no nuclear fuel no fusion very bad
for life-forms alternatively if you have
no element heavier than hydrogen like
carbon nitrogen iron very bad for life
um go ahead I defy anyone to make a
life-form out of purely hydrogen atoms
completely impossible you mean we
averted complete cosmological you got it
by a factor of two percent and the
strong you take four of the constants
here a gravitational constant the mass
of the proton the mass of the electron

Spanish: 
would be no hydrogen now if there's no
hydrogen I can assure you of this no
water no nuclear fuel no fusion very bad
for life-forms alternatively if you have
no element heavier than hydrogen like
carbon nitrogen iron very bad for life
um go ahead I defy anyone to make a
life-form out of purely hydrogen atoms
completely impossible you mean we
averted complete cosmological you got it
by a factor of two percent and the
strong you take four of the constants
here a gravitational constant the mass
of the proton the mass of the electron

English: 
would be no hydrogen now if there's no
hydrogen I can assure you of this no
water no nuclear fuel no fusion very bad
for life-forms alternatively if you have
no element heavier than hydrogen like
carbon nitrogen iron very bad for life
um go ahead I defy anyone to make a
life-form out of purely hydrogen atoms
completely impossible you mean we
averted complete cosmological you got it
by a factor of two percent and the
strong you take four of the constants
here a gravitational constant the mass
of the proton the mass of the electron

Vietnamese: 
would be no hydrogen now if there's no
hydrogen I can assure you of this no
water no nuclear fuel no fusion very bad
for life-forms alternatively if you have
no element heavier than hydrogen like
carbon nitrogen iron very bad for life
um go ahead I defy anyone to make a
life-form out of purely hydrogen atoms
completely impossible you mean we
averted complete cosmological you got it
by a factor of two percent and the
strong you take four of the constants
here a gravitational constant the mass
of the proton the mass of the electron

English: 
or the electromagnetic charge alter any
one of those babies by one part in ten
to the 39 you with me one part in ten
that's a decimal point 38 zeroes in a
one higher or lower and that by the way
they could have had much higher valves
they could have much lower valleys but
they got it right in the right zone but
if you altered them by one part in 10 to
the 39th then either every star in our
universe would have been a blue giant
which would have had incinerated
everything or every star in our universe
would have been a red dwarf in which
case everything would have frozen both
alternatives exceedingly bad for
life-forms you mean we averted complete
cosmological disaster and all of the
stars of argument right I mean
we're so lucky I mean here we are I mean
we've got these four constants and
they're so precisely valued

Spanish: 
or the electromagnetic charge alter any
one of those babies by one part in ten
to the 39 you with me one part in ten
that's a decimal point 38 zeroes in a
one higher or lower and that by the way
they could have had much higher valves
they could have much lower valleys but
they got it right in the right zone but
if you altered them by one part in 10 to
the 39th then either every star in our
universe would have been a blue giant
which would have had incinerated
everything or every star in our universe
would have been a red dwarf in which
case everything would have frozen both
alternatives exceedingly bad for
life-forms you mean we averted complete
cosmological disaster and all of the
stars of argument right I mean
we're so lucky I mean here we are I mean
we've got these four constants and
they're so precisely valued

Vietnamese: 
or the electromagnetic charge alter any
one of those babies by one part in ten
to the 39 you with me one part in ten
that's a decimal point 38 zeroes in a
one higher or lower and that by the way
they could have had much higher valves
they could have much lower valleys but
they got it right in the right zone but
if you altered them by one part in 10 to
the 39th then either every star in our
universe would have been a blue giant
which would have had incinerated
everything or every star in our universe
would have been a red dwarf in which
case everything would have frozen both
alternatives exceedingly bad for
life-forms you mean we averted complete
cosmological disaster and all of the
stars of argument right I mean
we're so lucky I mean here we are I mean
we've got these four constants and
they're so precisely valued

French: 
or the electromagnetic charge alter any
one of those babies by one part in ten
to the 39 you with me one part in ten
that's a decimal point 38 zeroes in a
one higher or lower and that by the way
they could have had much higher valves
they could have much lower valleys but
they got it right in the right zone but
if you altered them by one part in 10 to
the 39th then either every star in our
universe would have been a blue giant
which would have had incinerated
everything or every star in our universe
would have been a red dwarf in which
case everything would have frozen both
alternatives exceedingly bad for
life-forms you mean we averted complete
cosmological disaster and all of the
stars of argument right I mean
we're so lucky I mean here we are I mean
we've got these four constants and
they're so precisely valued

Spanish: 
I mean we're sitting right on the cusp
of thermodynamic you know you know you
know understand instability right I mean
and and we're just sitting there and and
yet there are tons of stars like ours
all because those constants just came
out the right way at the big bang case
so what are we up against I mean if we
got monkeys typing Shakespeare again and
again and again for the bachelor proton
mass electron electromagnetic charge
strong nuclear force coupling constant
weak force constant low entropy at the
beginning of the universe and we got so
many monkeys producing Shakespeare and
by pure chance so many times I mean the
odds of this happening there's only two
alternatives I'm just going to tell you
right now this did not happen in our
universe by one-off pure chance

Vietnamese: 
I mean we're sitting right on the cusp
of thermodynamic you know you know you
know understand instability right I mean
and and we're just sitting there and and
yet there are tons of stars like ours
all because those constants just came
out the right way at the big bang case
so what are we up against I mean if we
got monkeys typing Shakespeare again and
again and again for the bachelor proton
mass electron electromagnetic charge
strong nuclear force coupling constant
weak force constant low entropy at the
beginning of the universe and we got so
many monkeys producing Shakespeare and
by pure chance so many times I mean the
odds of this happening there's only two
alternatives I'm just going to tell you
right now this did not happen in our
universe by one-off pure chance

French: 
I mean we're sitting right on the cusp
of thermodynamic you know you know you
know understand instability right I mean
and and we're just sitting there and and
yet there are tons of stars like ours
all because those constants just came
out the right way at the big bang case
so what are we up against I mean if we
got monkeys typing Shakespeare again and
again and again for the bachelor proton
mass electron electromagnetic charge
strong nuclear force coupling constant
weak force constant low entropy at the
beginning of the universe and we got so
many monkeys producing Shakespeare and
by pure chance so many times I mean the
odds of this happening there's only two
alternatives I'm just going to tell you
right now this did not happen in our
universe by one-off pure chance

English: 
I mean we're sitting right on the cusp
of thermodynamic you know you know you
know understand instability right I mean
and and we're just sitting there and and
yet there are tons of stars like ours
all because those constants just came
out the right way at the big bang case
so what are we up against I mean if we
got monkeys typing Shakespeare again and
again and again for the bachelor proton
mass electron electromagnetic charge
strong nuclear force coupling constant
weak force constant low entropy at the
beginning of the universe and we got so
many monkeys producing Shakespeare and
by pure chance so many times I mean the
odds of this happening there's only two
alternatives I'm just going to tell you
right now this did not happen in our
universe by one-off pure chance

English: 
random selection and not even Stephen
Hawking buys that one what are the two
options a multiverse or a really smart
creator that's all the only options you
have the multiverse of course is going
to be something selected by people who
don't want to believe in a smart creator
sending the values of the constants so
what does the multiverse afford remember
it's possible it's hypothetical but it's
possible you could have a multiverse
burping out all kinds of bubble
universes and maybe maybe you not only
have 10 to the 10 to the 123 public
numbers we know that every multi-verse
has to have a beginning right but maybe
it goes back so far back in time that
you not only had 10 to the 10 to the 123
universes you had 10 to the 10 to the 10
to the 10 to the 10 to the 123 bubble

Spanish: 
random selection and not even Stephen
Hawking buys that one what are the two
options a multiverse or a really smart
creator that's all the only options you
have the multiverse of course is going
to be something selected by people who
don't want to believe in a smart creator
sending the values of the constants so
what does the multiverse afford remember
it's possible it's hypothetical but it's
possible you could have a multiverse
burping out all kinds of bubble
universes and maybe maybe you not only
have 10 to the 10 to the 123 public
numbers we know that every multi-verse
has to have a beginning right but maybe
it goes back so far back in time that
you not only had 10 to the 10 to the 123
universes you had 10 to the 10 to the 10
to the 10 to the 10 to the 123 bubble

French: 
random selection and not even Stephen
Hawking buys that one what are the two
options a multiverse or a really smart
creator that's all the only options you
have the multiverse of course is going
to be something selected by people who
don't want to believe in a smart creator
sending the values of the constants so
what does the multiverse afford remember
it's possible it's hypothetical but it's
possible you could have a multiverse
burping out all kinds of bubble
universes and maybe maybe you not only
have 10 to the 10 to the 123 public
numbers we know that every multi-verse
has to have a beginning right but maybe
it goes back so far back in time that
you not only had 10 to the 10 to the 123
universes you had 10 to the 10 to the 10
to the 10 to the 10 to the 123 bubble

Vietnamese: 
random selection and not even Stephen
Hawking buys that one what are the two
options a multiverse or a really smart
creator that's all the only options you
have the multiverse of course is going
to be something selected by people who
don't want to believe in a smart creator
sending the values of the constants so
what does the multiverse afford remember
it's possible it's hypothetical but it's
possible you could have a multiverse
burping out all kinds of bubble
universes and maybe maybe you not only
have 10 to the 10 to the 123 public
numbers we know that every multi-verse
has to have a beginning right but maybe
it goes back so far back in time that
you not only had 10 to the 10 to the 123
universes you had 10 to the 10 to the 10
to the 10 to the 10 to the 123 bubble

French: 
universes so finally you could have one
universe like ours as Paul Davies once
put it
and formula for the for the multi-verse
well well that's like bringing excess
baggage to cosmic extremes what he meant
to say was it's a violation of the law
of parsimony what's called Occam's razor
but that doesn't prove that it's false
it just proves that the multiverse
hypothesis at that level of extreme is
contrary to what nature normally is
nature's elegant nature is parsimonious
Nature doesn't have just needlessly
duplicated systems right in order to
produce ordered effects but that doesn't
disprove it the multiverse could still
be the case and could still explain our

Vietnamese: 
universes so finally you could have one
universe like ours as Paul Davies once
put it
and formula for the for the multi-verse
well well that's like bringing excess
baggage to cosmic extremes what he meant
to say was it's a violation of the law
of parsimony what's called Occam's razor
but that doesn't prove that it's false
it just proves that the multiverse
hypothesis at that level of extreme is
contrary to what nature normally is
nature's elegant nature is parsimonious
Nature doesn't have just needlessly
duplicated systems right in order to
produce ordered effects but that doesn't
disprove it the multiverse could still
be the case and could still explain our

Spanish: 
universes so finally you could have one
universe like ours as Paul Davies once
put it
and formula for the for the multi-verse
well well that's like bringing excess
baggage to cosmic extremes what he meant
to say was it's a violation of the law
of parsimony what's called Occam's razor
but that doesn't prove that it's false
it just proves that the multiverse
hypothesis at that level of extreme is
contrary to what nature normally is
nature's elegant nature is parsimonious
Nature doesn't have just needlessly
duplicated systems right in order to
produce ordered effects but that doesn't
disprove it the multiverse could still
be the case and could still explain our

English: 
universes so finally you could have one
universe like ours as Paul Davies once
put it
and formula for the for the multi-verse
well well that's like bringing excess
baggage to cosmic extremes what he meant
to say was it's a violation of the law
of parsimony what's called Occam's razor
but that doesn't prove that it's false
it just proves that the multiverse
hypothesis at that level of extreme is
contrary to what nature normally is
nature's elegant nature is parsimonious
Nature doesn't have just needlessly
duplicated systems right in order to
produce ordered effects but that doesn't
disprove it the multiverse could still
be the case and could still explain our

French: 
universe with all of its constants able
to produce a life-form
like ours the real kicker though is this
every known multiverse hypothesis today
requires fine-tuning in its initial
parameters and constants oh you can't
have a random multiverse ladies and
gentlemen you can't have a multiverse
that is literally spewing out bubble
universes sporadically and at random you
can't do that why is that because
universe is within a multiverse have an
extremely strong gravitational effect
huge so if these universes start coming
right that the gravitational force of
these universes within the multiverse

Spanish: 
universe with all of its constants able
to produce a life-form
like ours the real kicker though is this
every known multiverse hypothesis today
requires fine-tuning in its initial
parameters and constants oh you can't
have a random multiverse ladies and
gentlemen you can't have a multiverse
that is literally spewing out bubble
universes sporadically and at random you
can't do that why is that because
universe is within a multiverse have an
extremely strong gravitational effect
huge so if these universes start coming
right that the gravitational force of
these universes within the multiverse

English: 
universe with all of its constants able
to produce a life-form
like ours the real kicker though is this
every known multiverse hypothesis today
requires fine-tuning in its initial
parameters and constants oh you can't
have a random multiverse ladies and
gentlemen you can't have a multiverse
that is literally spewing out bubble
universes sporadically and at random you
can't do that why is that because
universe is within a multiverse have an
extremely strong gravitational effect
huge so if these universes start coming
right that the gravitational force of
these universes within the multiverse

Vietnamese: 
universe with all of its constants able
to produce a life-form
like ours the real kicker though is this
every known multiverse hypothesis today
requires fine-tuning in its initial
parameters and constants oh you can't
have a random multiverse ladies and
gentlemen you can't have a multiverse
that is literally spewing out bubble
universes sporadically and at random you
can't do that why is that because
universe is within a multiverse have an
extremely strong gravitational effect
huge so if these universes start coming
right that the gravitational force of
these universes within the multiverse

Spanish: 
they start coming even within remote
proximity of one another right the
gravitational forces start just you know
shaking these universes like a jello
which is exceedingly bad for life-forms
No what you're gonna need is a real slow
orderly role of bubble universes that
can never create interference one with
another and by the way whatever you do
you don't want bubble universes
colliding with each other oh boy is that
bad for life-forms so you need a slow
roll of the bubble universes but if
you're going to get a slow roll of the
bubble universes you're gonna have to
have fine tuning and the initial
parameters and constants of the
multiverse dr4 the multiverse cannot be

English: 
they start coming even within remote
proximity of one another right the
gravitational forces start just you know
shaking these universes like a jello
which is exceedingly bad for life-forms
No what you're gonna need is a real slow
orderly role of bubble universes that
can never create interference one with
another and by the way whatever you do
you don't want bubble universes
colliding with each other oh boy is that
bad for life-forms so you need a slow
roll of the bubble universes but if
you're going to get a slow roll of the
bubble universes you're gonna have to
have fine tuning and the initial
parameters and constants of the
multiverse dr4 the multiverse cannot be

Vietnamese: 
they start coming even within remote
proximity of one another right the
gravitational forces start just you know
shaking these universes like a jello
which is exceedingly bad for life-forms
No what you're gonna need is a real slow
orderly role of bubble universes that
can never create interference one with
another and by the way whatever you do
you don't want bubble universes
colliding with each other oh boy is that
bad for life-forms so you need a slow
roll of the bubble universes but if
you're going to get a slow roll of the
bubble universes you're gonna have to
have fine tuning and the initial
parameters and constants of the
multiverse dr4 the multiverse cannot be

French: 
they start coming even within remote
proximity of one another right the
gravitational forces start just you know
shaking these universes like a jello
which is exceedingly bad for life-forms
No what you're gonna need is a real slow
orderly role of bubble universes that
can never create interference one with
another and by the way whatever you do
you don't want bubble universes
colliding with each other oh boy is that
bad for life-forms so you need a slow
roll of the bubble universes but if
you're going to get a slow roll of the
bubble universes you're gonna have to
have fine tuning and the initial
parameters and constants of the
multiverse dr4 the multiverse cannot be

Vietnamese: 
a perfect solution to the problem of
design to the problem of order all
you're doing with the multiverse is
moving the problem back one step now
it's not where did the order of the
universe come from so that we can have
life on Earth now it's where did the
order of the multiverse come from in its
initial parameters and constants so it
could give rise to bubble universes
which wouldn't collide into each other
so that we could have a bubble universe
like ours on earth you guys with me for
this reason sir Fred Hoyle kind of put
it this way oh by the way sir Fred Hoyle
was one of physics most atheistic
physicists but one day his partner
William Fowler came in to him and said
Fred do you know what the odds of
beryllium oxygen helium and carbon
having the precise resonance levels that
they have in order to have an abundance

French: 
a perfect solution to the problem of
design to the problem of order all
you're doing with the multiverse is
moving the problem back one step now
it's not where did the order of the
universe come from so that we can have
life on Earth now it's where did the
order of the multiverse come from in its
initial parameters and constants so it
could give rise to bubble universes
which wouldn't collide into each other
so that we could have a bubble universe
like ours on earth you guys with me for
this reason sir Fred Hoyle kind of put
it this way oh by the way sir Fred Hoyle
was one of physics most atheistic
physicists but one day his partner
William Fowler came in to him and said
Fred do you know what the odds of
beryllium oxygen helium and carbon
having the precise resonance levels that
they have in order to have an abundance

English: 
a perfect solution to the problem of
design to the problem of order all
you're doing with the multiverse is
moving the problem back one step now
it's not where did the order of the
universe come from so that we can have
life on Earth now it's where did the
order of the multiverse come from in its
initial parameters and constants so it
could give rise to bubble universes
which wouldn't collide into each other
so that we could have a bubble universe
like ours on earth you guys with me for
this reason sir Fred Hoyle kind of put
it this way oh by the way sir Fred Hoyle
was one of physics most atheistic
physicists but one day his partner
William Fowler came in to him and said
Fred do you know what the odds of
beryllium oxygen helium and carbon
having the precise resonance levels that
they have in order to have an abundance

Spanish: 
a perfect solution to the problem of
design to the problem of order all
you're doing with the multiverse is
moving the problem back one step now
it's not where did the order of the
universe come from so that we can have
life on Earth now it's where did the
order of the multiverse come from in its
initial parameters and constants so it
could give rise to bubble universes
which wouldn't collide into each other
so that we could have a bubble universe
like ours on earth you guys with me for
this reason sir Fred Hoyle kind of put
it this way oh by the way sir Fred Hoyle
was one of physics most atheistic
physicists but one day his partner
William Fowler came in to him and said
Fred do you know what the odds of
beryllium oxygen helium and carbon
having the precise resonance levels that
they have in order to have an abundance

Vietnamese: 
of carbon in the universe Fred said no I
think I do
so here the equations and Fred goes into
his office and and here's the quote I'll
paraphrase it I don't think there are
any blind forces worth speaking about it
seems to me that some super calculating
super intellect has monkeyed with the
constants of physics and those of
chemistry and biology as well
I consider this conclusion to be beyond
the shadow of a doubt he later went on
to say the odds of having an abundance
of carbon in our universe given the
resonance levels is tantamount to well a
tornado going through a junkyard and

English: 
of carbon in the universe Fred said no I
think I do
so here the equations and Fred goes into
his office and and here's the quote I'll
paraphrase it I don't think there are
any blind forces worth speaking about it
seems to me that some super calculating
super intellect has monkeyed with the
constants of physics and those of
chemistry and biology as well
I consider this conclusion to be beyond
the shadow of a doubt he later went on
to say the odds of having an abundance
of carbon in our universe given the
resonance levels is tantamount to well a
tornado going through a junkyard and

Spanish: 
of carbon in the universe Fred said no I
creo que hago
so here the equations and Fred goes into
his office and and here's the quote I'll
paraphrase it I don't think there are
any blind forces worth speaking about it
seems to me that some super calculating
super intellect has monkeyed with the
constants of physics and those of
chemistry and biology as well
I consider this conclusion to be beyond
the shadow of a doubt he later went on
to say the odds of having an abundance
of carbon in our universe given the
resonance levels is tantamount to well a
tornado going through a junkyard and

French: 
of carbon in the universe Fred said no I
think I do
so here the equations and Fred goes into
his office and and here's the quote I'll
paraphrase it I don't think there are
any blind forces worth speaking about it
seems to me that some super calculating
super intellect has monkeyed with the
constants of physics and those of
chemistry and biology as well
I consider this conclusion to be beyond
the shadow of a doubt he later went on
to say the odds of having an abundance
of carbon in our universe given the
resonance levels is tantamount to well a
tornado going through a junkyard and

Spanish: 
assembling a Boeing 747 ready for flight
what's the point if you take those three
foci on that you know on that triangle
when you start looking at the board of a
Lincoln and Guth proof and its vast
applicability to multiverse as higher
dimensional space universes etc when you
start looking at the vast applicability
of entropy and the fact that the entropy
evidence and the space-time geometry
proof evidence both point to a beginning
of physical reality not just the
beginning of our universe but a
beginning of physical reality and if you
look at those fine-tuning coincidences
those strong anthropic coincidences
which by the way are not adequately
explained by a multiverse theory because
a multiverse theory has to have fun
tuning in its initial parameters in
constants when you assemble those three
things together I think we can say with
many physicists that is just as
reasonable if not more reasonable to

Vietnamese: 
assembling a Boeing 747 ready for flight
what's the point if you take those three
foci on that you know on that triangle
when you start looking at the board of a
Lincoln and Guth proof and its vast
applicability to multiverse as higher
dimensional space universes etc when you
start looking at the vast applicability
of entropy and the fact that the entropy
evidence and the space-time geometry
proof evidence both point to a beginning
of physical reality not just the
beginning of our universe but a
beginning of physical reality and if you
look at those fine-tuning coincidences
those strong anthropic coincidences
which by the way are not adequately
explained by a multiverse theory because
a multiverse theory has to have fun
tuning in its initial parameters in
constants when you assemble those three
things together I think we can say with
many physicists that is just as
reasonable if not more reasonable to

English: 
assembling a Boeing 747 ready for flight
what's the point if you take those three
foci on that you know on that triangle
when you start looking at the board of a
Lincoln and Guth proof and its vast
applicability to multiverse as higher
dimensional space universes etc when you
start looking at the vast applicability
of entropy and the fact that the entropy
evidence and the space-time geometry
proof evidence both point to a beginning
of physical reality not just the
beginning of our universe but a
beginning of physical reality and if you
look at those fine-tuning coincidences
those strong anthropic coincidences
which by the way are not adequately
explained by a multiverse theory because
a multiverse theory has to have fun
tuning in its initial parameters in
constants when you assemble those three
things together I think we can say with
many physicists that is just as
reasonable if not more reasonable to

French: 
assembling a Boeing 747 ready for flight
what's the point if you take those three
foci on that you know on that triangle
when you start looking at the board of a
Lincoln and Guth proof and its vast
applicability to multiverse as higher
dimensional space universes etc when you
start looking at the vast applicability
of entropy and the fact that the entropy
evidence and the space-time geometry
proof evidence both point to a beginning
of physical reality not just the
beginning of our universe but a
beginning of physical reality and if you
look at those fine-tuning coincidences
those strong anthropic coincidences
which by the way are not adequately
explained by a multiverse theory because
a multiverse theory has to have fun
tuning in its initial parameters in
constants when you assemble those three
things together I think we can say with
many physicists that is just as
reasonable if not more reasonable to

English: 
believe in an intelligent creator than
it is to believe in a multiverse which
would have to have a beginning anyway
and would have to have fine-tuning in
its initial parameters and constants
perhaps the best explanation lies in the
actual universe perhaps the best
explanation lies in the creator itself
an intelligent creator itself now of
course we know that Dawkins and other
people have tried to Ford arguments to
try and show that a creator would have
to be far more improbable than anything
that it creates
that is simply a false argument and it
can be easily disproved and if we don't
get to it in the Q&A session tonight
where would you go magis center.com

French: 
believe in an intelligent creator than
it is to believe in a multiverse which
would have to have a beginning anyway
and would have to have fine-tuning in
its initial parameters and constants
perhaps the best explanation lies in the
actual universe perhaps the best
explanation lies in the creator itself
an intelligent creator itself now of
course we know that Dawkins and other
people have tried to Ford arguments to
try and show that a creator would have
to be far more improbable than anything
that it creates
that is simply a false argument and it
can be easily disproved and if we don't
get to it in the Q&A session tonight
where would you go magis center.com

Spanish: 
believe in an intelligent creator than
it is to believe in a multiverse which
would have to have a beginning anyway
and would have to have fine-tuning in
its initial parameters and constants
perhaps the best explanation lies in the
actual universe perhaps the best
explanation lies in the creator itself
an intelligent creator itself now of
course we know that Dawkins and other
people have tried to Ford arguments to
try and show that a creator would have
to be far more improbable than anything
that it creates
that is simply a false argument and it
can be easily disproved and if we don't
get to it in the Q&A session tonight
where would you go magis center.com

Vietnamese: 
believe in an intelligent creator than
it is to believe in a multiverse which
would have to have a beginning anyway
and would have to have fine-tuning in
its initial parameters and constants
perhaps the best explanation lies in the
actual universe perhaps the best
explanation lies in the creator itself
an intelligent creator itself now of
course we know that Dawkins and other
people have tried to Ford arguments to
try and show that a creator would have
to be far more improbable than anything
that it creates
that is simply a false argument and it
can be easily disproved and if we don't
get to it in the Q&A session tonight
where would you go magis center.com

English: 
first landing page science reason and
faith and you would be able to get it
I'm gonna end right now just with a
quote from Robert Jastrow the founding
director of NASA's Goddard Institute for
Space Studies and he wrote a book while
back with a quote that applies just as
much today as as when he wrote it it was
a book called God and the astronomers
and this is what he said again I'll
paraphrase it scientists unshackled
themselves from the domain of
superstition took on a methodology which
was mathematical empirical and
hypothetical deductive and carefully
began to climb the structures this
mountain of knowledge they came to the
top pulled themselves over the final
precipice and found a band of
theologians there awaiting them for
centuries thank you very very much

Vietnamese: 
first landing page science reason and
faith and you would be able to get it
I'm gonna end right now just with a
quote from Robert Jastrow the founding
director of NASA's Goddard Institute for
Space Studies and he wrote a book while
back with a quote that applies just as
much today as as when he wrote it it was
a book called God and the astronomers
and this is what he said again I'll
paraphrase it scientists unshackled
themselves from the domain of
superstition took on a methodology which
was mathematical empirical and
hypothetical deductive and carefully
began to climb the structures this
mountain of knowledge they came to the
top pulled themselves over the final
precipice and found a band of
theologians there awaiting them for
centuries thank you very very much

French: 
first landing page science reason and
faith and you would be able to get it
I'm gonna end right now just with a
quote from Robert Jastrow the founding
director of NASA's Goddard Institute for
Space Studies and he wrote a book while
back with a quote that applies just as
much today as as when he wrote it it was
a book called God and the astronomers
and this is what he said again I'll
paraphrase it scientists unshackled
themselves from the domain of
superstition took on a methodology which
was mathematical empirical and
hypothetical deductive and carefully
began to climb the structures this
mountain of knowledge they came to the
top pulled themselves over the final
precipice and found a band of
theologians there awaiting them for
centuries thank you very very much

Spanish: 
first landing page science reason and
faith and you would be able to get it
I'm gonna end right now just with a
quote from Robert Jastrow the founding
director of NASA's Goddard Institute for
Space Studies and he wrote a book while
back with a quote that applies just as
much today as as when he wrote it it was
a book called God and the astronomers
and this is what he said again I'll
paraphrase it scientists unshackled
themselves from the domain of
superstition took on a methodology which
was mathematical empirical and
hypothetical deductive and carefully
began to climb the structures this
mountain of knowledge they came to the
top pulled themselves over the final
precipice and found a band of
theologians there awaiting them for
centuries thank you very very much

French: 
thank you very much what will we do want
to get to the Q&A but I know that people
may want to take a restroom break but
could I ask people if you want to just
just go to the restroom and would you
mind if we lunch just right into the Q&A
right now okay that'd be splendid
somebody will help me with the Q&A since
I have a little bit of a we're going to
ask them to come in
oh right here they can just line up
splendide

Spanish: 
thank you very much what will we do want
to get to the Q&A but I know that people
may want to take a restroom break but
could I ask people if you want to just
just go to the restroom and would you
mind if we lunch just right into the Q&A
right now okay that'd be splendid
somebody will help me with the Q&A since
I have a little bit of a we're going to
ask them to come in
oh right here they can just line up
splendid

Vietnamese: 
thank you very much what will we do want
to get to the Q&A but I know that people
may want to take a restroom break but
could I ask people if you want to just
just go to the restroom and would you
mind if we lunch just right into the Q&A
right now okay that'd be splendid
somebody will help me with the Q&A since
I have a little bit of a we're going to
ask them to come in
oh right here they can just line up
splendid

English: 
thank you very much what will we do want
to get to the Q&A but I know that people
may want to take a restroom break but
could I ask people if you want to just
just go to the restroom and would you
mind if we lunch just right into the Q&A
right now okay that'd be splendid
somebody will help me with the Q&A since
I have a little bit of a we're going to
ask them to come in
oh right here they can just line up
splendid

French: 
father Richard Spitzer mm-hmm I mean
Robert Switzer I was just wondering is
it true that in Einstein's general
theory of relativity that gravity can
bend time that gravity bends time yeah
yes as a matter of fact it is let me
just give you a quick rundown it's very
good an intelligent question in the
general theory of relativity what I'm
Stein did was you know he put together
this effect of the speed of light if the
effect is called effective special
theory of relativity
it's called length contraction and
duration dilation what happen speed of
light if you put a ruler in a rocket
ship let's say and you start
accelerating it closer and closer to the
speed of light you can actually prove
that the ruler must shrink it will start
getting smaller and smaller and smaller
the closer you get to the speed of light
but the opposite will happen namely with
respect to time with our clock so if we

Spanish: 
father Richard Spitzer mm-hmm I mean
Robert Switzer I was just wondering is
it true that in Einstein's general
theory of relativity that gravity can
bend time that gravity bends time yeah
yes as a matter of fact it is let me
just give you a quick rundown it's very
good an intelligent question in the
general theory of relativity what I'm
Stein did was you know he put together
this effect of the speed of light if the
effect is called effective special
theory of relativity
it's called length contraction and
duration dilation what happen speed of
light if you put a ruler in a rocket
ship let's say and you start
accelerating it closer and closer to the
speed of light you can actually prove
that the ruler must shrink it will start
getting smaller and smaller and smaller
the closer you get to the speed of light
but the opposite will happen namely with
respect to time with our clock so if we

Vietnamese: 
father Richard Spitzer mm-hmm I mean
Robert Switzer I was just wondering is
it true that in Einstein's general
theory of relativity that gravity can
bend time that gravity bends time yeah
yes as a matter of fact it is let me
just give you a quick rundown it's very
good an intelligent question in the
general theory of relativity what I'm
Stein did was you know he put together
this effect of the speed of light if the
effect is called effective special
theory of relativity
it's called length contraction and
duration dilation what happen speed of
light if you put a ruler in a rocket
ship let's say and you start
accelerating it closer and closer to the
speed of light you can actually prove
that the ruler must shrink it will start
getting smaller and smaller and smaller
the closer you get to the speed of light
but the opposite will happen namely with
respect to time with our clock so if we

English: 
father Richard Spitzer mm-hmm I mean
Robert Switzer I was just wondering is
it true that in Einstein's general
theory of relativity that gravity can
bend time that gravity bends time yeah
yes as a matter of fact it is let me
just give you a quick rundown it's very
good an intelligent question in the
general theory of relativity what I'm
Stein did was you know he put together
this effect of the speed of light if the
effect is called effective special
theory of relativity
it's called length contraction and
duration dilation what happen speed of
light if you put a ruler in a rocket
ship let's say and you start
accelerating it closer and closer to the
speed of light you can actually prove
that the ruler must shrink it will start
getting smaller and smaller and smaller
the closer you get to the speed of light
but the opposite will happen namely with
respect to time with our clock so if we

English: 
have a clock with a swinging pendulum
right or at least going in the direction
of the rocket ship then what's going to
happen is that the pendulum is going to
slow down so that's going to call the
expansion of duration so you have you
have to have what's called the Lorentz
Einstein transformation in order to
figure out what the size of a ruler is
in a rocket ship compared to the rulers
that I have on
in my reference frame and the the pace
of the clocks right and in in terms of
you know my reference frame my clock and
my reference frame now this has been
proven over and over again huffily in
Wilson's atomic clock expand expansion
the most perfect the right the PI Mesa a
new Mesa and decay its parents at decay
experiments etc right this has been
proven again and again and again yes in
insight a highly accelerating rocket
ship time is going slower and the
measurement of time is going slower and

Spanish: 
have a clock with a swinging pendulum
right or at least going in the direction
of the rocket ship then what's going to
happen is that the pendulum is going to
slow down so that's going to call the
expansion of duration so you have you
have to have what's called the Lorentz
Einstein transformation in order to
figure out what the size of a ruler is
in a rocket ship compared to the rulers
that I have on
in my reference frame and the the pace
of the clocks right and in in terms of
you know my reference frame my clock and
my reference frame now this has been
proven over and over again huffily in
Wilson's atomic clock expand expansion
the most perfect the right the PI Mesa a
new Mesa and decay its parents at decay
experiments etc right this has been
proven again and again and again yes in
insight a highly accelerating rocket
ship time is going slower and the
measurement of time is going slower and

French: 
have a clock with a swinging pendulum
right or at least going in the direction
of the rocket ship then what's going to
happen is that the pendulum is going to
slow down so that's going to call the
expansion of duration so you have you
have to have what's called the Lorentz
Einstein transformation in order to
figure out what the size of a ruler is
in a rocket ship compared to the rulers
that I have on
in my reference frame and the the pace
of the clocks right and in in terms of
you know my reference frame my clock and
my reference frame now this has been
proven over and over again huffily in
Wilson's atomic clock expand expansion
the most perfect the right the PI Mesa a
new Mesa and decay its parents at decay
experiments etc right this has been
proven again and again and again yes in
insight a highly accelerating rocket
ship time is going slower and the
measurement of time is going slower and

Vietnamese: 
have a clock with a swinging pendulum
right or at least going in the direction
of the rocket ship then what's going to
happen is that the pendulum is going to
slow down so that's going to call the
expansion of duration so you have you
have to have what's called the Lorentz
Einstein transformation in order to
figure out what the size of a ruler is
in a rocket ship compared to the rulers
that I have on
in my reference frame and the the pace
of the clocks right and in in terms of
you know my reference frame my clock and
my reference frame now this has been
proven over and over again huffily in
Wilson's atomic clock expand expansion
the most perfect the right the PI Mesa a
new Mesa and decay its parents at decay
experiments etc right this has been
proven again and again and again yes in
insight a highly accelerating rocket
ship time is going slower and the
measurement of time is going slower and

French: 
yes in fact the ruler is shrinking now
what hein Stein did in the general
theory of relativity is he linked all of
this up to gravity showing that special
relativistic effects were also a you
know not only predictable but we're also
traceable back to the curvature of
space-time
so therefore could the curvature of
space-time actually for example in a
black hole in a black hole the curvature
of space-time right you know because of
the density of mass energy and when the
density of mass energy is very very high
right and and it's gonna collapse
the geometry of space-time in the area
in which it exists but remember all
space-time is linked to all other
space-time so even though you get you
know you have very very very small units
down near the base of the black hole
about 10 to the minus 33 centimeters as
you kind of go out it gets a little
bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger

Vietnamese: 
yes in fact the ruler is shrinking now
what hein Stein did in the general
theory of relativity is he linked all of
this up to gravity showing that special
relativistic effects were also a you
know not only predictable but we're also
traceable back to the curvature of
space-time
so therefore could the curvature of
space-time actually for example in a
black hole in a black hole the curvature
of space-time right you know because of
the density of mass energy and when the
density of mass energy is very very high
right and and it's gonna collapse
the geometry of space-time in the area
in which it exists but remember all
space-time is linked to all other
space-time so even though you get you
know you have very very very small units
down near the base of the black hole
about 10 to the minus 33 centimeters as
you kind of go out it gets a little
bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger

Spanish: 
yes in fact the ruler is shrinking now
what hein Stein did in the general
theory of relativity is he linked all of
this up to gravity showing that special
relativistic effects were also a you
know not only predictable but we're also
traceable back to the curvature of
space-time
so therefore could the curvature of
space-time actually for example in a
black hole in a black hole the curvature
of space-time right you know because of
the density of mass energy and when the
density of mass energy is very very high
right and and it's gonna collapse
the geometry of space-time in the area
in which it exists but remember all
space-time is linked to all other
space-time so even though you get you
know you have very very very small units
down near the base of the black hole
about 10 to the minus 33 centimeters as
you kind of go out it gets a little
Más y más y más y más y más y más

English: 
yes in fact the ruler is shrinking now
what hein Stein did in the general
theory of relativity is he linked all of
this up to gravity showing that special
relativistic effects were also a you
know not only predictable but we're also
traceable back to the curvature of
space-time
so therefore could the curvature of
space-time actually for example in a
black hole in a black hole the curvature
of space-time right you know because of
the density of mass energy and when the
density of mass energy is very very high
right and and it's gonna collapse
the geometry of space-time in the area
in which it exists but remember all
space-time is linked to all other
space-time so even though you get you
know you have very very very small units
down near the base of the black hole
about 10 to the minus 33 centimeters as
you kind of go out it gets a little
bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger

Vietnamese: 
now remember it's not just space that
contracts its duration that dilates so
basically then if you have some kind of
an orbital that's coming in right to
this black hole and it gets caught in
the black hole and it's getting swept
into a the curvature of space-time which
is smaller and smaller and smaller and
smaller so it's getting toward the base
of the black hole it's actually right
that the matter is actually taking on
the space-time geometry of the the
continuum in which it's traveling so
it's going to get smaller right and so
that's why you'd have like a
get sucked into a black hole it's going
to turn into a spaghetti all right
because if the outside is gonna be
stringing out there a little bit while
the inside is getting denser and denser
and smaller and smaller but not just
that but the actual measurement of time
so if a rocket ship was coming in there
with a clock what would be happening to

French: 
now remember it's not just space that
contracts its duration that dilates so
basically then if you have some kind of
an orbital that's coming in right to
this black hole and it gets caught in
the black hole and it's getting swept
into a the curvature of space-time which
is smaller and smaller and smaller and
smaller so it's getting toward the base
of the black hole it's actually right
that the matter is actually taking on
the space-time geometry of the the
continuum in which it's traveling so
it's going to get smaller right and so
that's why you'd have like a
get sucked into a black hole it's going
to turn into a spaghetti all right
because if the outside is gonna be
stringing out there a little bit while
the inside is getting denser and denser
and smaller and smaller but not just
that but the actual measurement of time
so if a rocket ship was coming in there
with a clock what would be happening to

English: 
now remember it's not just space that
contracts its duration that dilates so
basically then if you have some kind of
an orbital that's coming in right to
this black hole and it gets caught in
the black hole and it's getting swept
into a the curvature of space-time which
is smaller and smaller and smaller and
smaller so it's getting toward the base
of the black hole it's actually right
that the matter is actually taking on
the space-time geometry of the the
continuum in which it's traveling so
it's going to get smaller right and so
that's why you'd have like a
get sucked into a black hole it's going
to turn into a spaghetti all right
because if the outside is gonna be
stringing out there a little bit while
the inside is getting denser and denser
and smaller and smaller but not just
that but the actual measurement of time
so if a rocket ship was coming in there
with a clock what would be happening to

Spanish: 
now remember it's not just space that
contracts its duration that dilates so
basically then if you have some kind of
an orbital that's coming in right to
this black hole and it gets caught in
the black hole and it's getting swept
into a the curvature of space-time which
is smaller and smaller and smaller and
smaller so it's getting toward the base
of the black hole it's actually right
that the matter is actually taking on
the space-time geometry of the the
continuum in which it's traveling so
it's going to get smaller right and so
that's why you'd have like a
get sucked into a black hole it's going
to turn into a spaghetti all right
because if the outside is gonna be
stringing out there a little bit while
the inside is getting denser and denser
and smaller and smaller but not just
that but the actual measurement of time
so if a rocket ship was coming in there
with a clock what would be happening to

French: 
that clock as you got toward the base of
the of the black hole he'd be slowing
down slowing down slowing down slowing
down it's not a but of course as it's
going down the pace of the clock will be
faster behind and it would be slower
toward the front end it would be bending
time and bending space exactly because
of course space-time is not distinct
from mass energy mass energy and
space-time are a single organic hole and
of course in as much as they are we not
only have this weird coincidence of
things but actually the universe is
capable of sustaining life itself thank
God for the bending of space and time if

English: 
that clock as you got toward the base of
the of the black hole he'd be slowing
down slowing down slowing down slowing
down it's not a but of course as it's
going down the pace of the clock will be
faster behind and it would be slower
toward the front end it would be bending
time and bending space exactly because
of course space-time is not distinct
from mass energy mass energy and
space-time are a single organic hole and
of course in as much as they are we not
only have this weird coincidence of
things but actually the universe is
capable of sustaining life itself thank
God for the bending of space and time if

Spanish: 
that clock as you got toward the base of
the of the black hole he'd be slowing
down slowing down slowing down slowing
down it's not a but of course as it's
going down the pace of the clock will be
faster behind and it would be slower
toward the front end it would be bending
time and bending space exactly because
of course space-time is not distinct
from mass energy mass energy and
space-time are a single organic hole and
of course in as much as they are we not
only have this weird coincidence of
things but actually the universe is
capable of sustaining life itself thank
God for the bending of space and time if

Vietnamese: 
that clock as you got toward the base of
the of the black hole he'd be slowing
down slowing down slowing down slowing
down it's not a but of course as it's
going down the pace of the clock will be
faster behind and it would be slower
toward the front end it would be bending
time and bending space exactly because
of course space-time is not distinct
from mass energy mass energy and
space-time are a single organic hole and
of course in as much as they are we not
only have this weird coincidence of
things but actually the universe is
capable of sustaining life itself thank
God for the bending of space and time if

Vietnamese: 
we didn't have it we wouldn't be around
great question thank you thanks I grew
up with the idea that the universe was
physically infinite you made a statement
earlier tonight I believe about the
believing the radius to be eight years
which suggests that if theoretically we
could travel to the end of the universe
after a hundred billion light years it
would end would we hit a wall what what
what would be there at that no you just
keep going as it were around the the the
circumference of the universe the
topographies range there are many many
theories about what the the universe
looks like you know geodesic Li and
geometrically but eventually what would
happen is no you wouldn't be hitting the
wall you would just be whee
p-ting yourself was the old Einsteinian
thing what's the furthest point you can
see looking through your telescope if

French: 
we didn't have it we wouldn't be around
great question thank you thanks I grew
up with the idea that the universe was
physically infinite you made a statement
earlier tonight I believe about the
believing the radius to be eight years
which suggests that if theoretically we
could travel to the end of the universe
after a hundred billion light years it
would end would we hit a wall what what
what would be there at that no you just
keep going as it were around the the the
circumference of the universe the
topographies range there are many many
theories about what the the universe
looks like you know geodesic Li and
geometrically but eventually what would
happen is no you wouldn't be hitting the
wall you would just be whee
p-ting yourself was the old Einsteinian
thing what's the furthest point you can
see looking through your telescope if

English: 
we didn't have it we wouldn't be around
great question thank you thanks I grew
up with the idea that the universe was
physically infinite you made a statement
earlier tonight I believe about the
believing the radius to be eight years
which suggests that if theoretically we
could travel to the end of the universe
after a hundred billion light years it
would end would we hit a wall what what
what would be there at that no you just
keep going as it were around the the the
circumference of the universe the
topographies range there are many many
theories about what the the universe
looks like you know geodesic Li and
geometrically but eventually what would
happen is no you wouldn't be hitting the
wall you would just be whee
p-ting yourself was the old Einsteinian
thing what's the furthest point you can
see looking through your telescope if

Spanish: 
we didn't have it we wouldn't be around
great question thank you thanks I grew
up with the idea that the universe was
physically infinite you made a statement
earlier tonight I believe about the
believing the radius to be eight years
which suggests that if theoretically we
could travel to the end of the universe
after a hundred billion light years it
would end would we hit a wall what what
what would be there at that no you just
keep going as it were around the the the
circumference of the universe the
topographies range there are many many
theories about what the the universe
looks like you know geodesic Li and
geometrically but eventually what would
happen is no you wouldn't be hitting the
wall you would just be whee
p-ting yourself was the old Einsteinian
thing what's the furthest point you can
see looking through your telescope if

Spanish: 
you went back 13.8 billion years in time
if you were around 13.8 billion years
ago you'd see the back of your head yeah
so the light would have come as it were
full circle now of course we don't think
the universe is a perfect sphere today
we think there's all kinds of other
possible configurations but nevertheless
unfortunately no walls to hit just
reroutes to experience good question
though yeah but it looks like it
probably is finite there are some ways
in which you could say that the universe
will continue to expand into wait we
call that a potential infinity but right
now we don't think that the universe is
an actual infinity we really do think
it's probably about a hundred billion
light years and radius somewhere in that
neighborhood good good question

Vietnamese: 
you went back 13.8 billion years in time
if you were around 13.8 billion years
ago you'd see the back of your head yeah
so the light would have come as it were
full circle now of course we don't think
the universe is a perfect sphere today
we think there's all kinds of other
possible configurations but nevertheless
unfortunately no walls to hit just
reroutes to experience good question
though yeah but it looks like it
probably is finite there are some ways
in which you could say that the universe
will continue to expand into wait we
call that a potential infinity but right
now we don't think that the universe is
an actual infinity we really do think
it's probably about a hundred billion
light years and radius somewhere in that
neighborhood good good question

French: 
you went back 13.8 billion years in time
if you were around 13.8 billion years
ago you'd see the back of your head yeah
so the light would have come as it were
full circle now of course we don't think
the universe is a perfect sphere today
we think there's all kinds of other
possible configurations but nevertheless
unfortunately no walls to hit just
reroutes to experience good question
though yeah but it looks like it
probably is finite there are some ways
in which you could say that the universe
will continue to expand into wait we
call that a potential infinity but right
now we don't think that the universe is
an actual infinity we really do think
it's probably about a hundred billion
light years and radius somewhere in that
neighborhood good good question

English: 
you went back 13.8 billion years in time
if you were around 13.8 billion years
ago you'd see the back of your head yeah
so the light would have come as it were
full circle now of course we don't think
the universe is a perfect sphere today
we think there's all kinds of other
possible configurations but nevertheless
unfortunately no walls to hit just
reroutes to experience good question
though yeah but it looks like it
probably is finite there are some ways
in which you could say that the universe
will continue to expand into wait we
call that a potential infinity but right
now we don't think that the universe is
an actual infinity we really do think
it's probably about a hundred billion
light years and radius somewhere in that
neighborhood good good question

Vietnamese: 
simplistically what do you say to people
who do not believe in evolution or say
you're not a Christian if you believe in
evolution
besides laughs no I'm just kidding
no huh no I'm just kidding well I think
this III bring out you know John can you
actually flip over to John Paul the
second message to the Pontifical Academy
of Sciences it's one of the evolutionary
the you know just flip down to evolution
here's a nice little message from John
Paul the second by the way the Catholic
Church's is long-held that the physical
evidence the the chemical evidence of
the fossil evidence and the genetic
evidence point very very profoundly to a
good possibility of evolution it's it
goes all the way back really to Pope
Pius the 12th and Pope Pius the 12th and

French: 
simplistically what do you say to people
who do not believe in evolution or say
you're not a Christian if you believe in
evolution
besides laughs no I'm just kidding
no huh no I'm just kidding well I think
this III bring out you know John can you
actually flip over to John Paul the
second message to the Pontifical Academy
of Sciences it's one of the evolutionary
the you know just flip down to evolution
here's a nice little message from John
Paul the second by the way the Catholic
Church's is long-held that the physical
evidence the the chemical evidence of
the fossil evidence and the genetic
evidence point very very profoundly to a
good possibility of evolution it's it
goes all the way back really to Pope
Pius the 12th and Pope Pius the 12th and

Spanish: 
simplistically what do you say to people
who do not believe in evolution or say
you're not a Christian if you believe in
evolución
besides laughs no I'm just kidding
no huh no I'm just kidding well I think
this III bring out you know John can you
actually flip over to John Paul the
second message to the Pontifical Academy
of Sciences it's one of the evolutionary
the you know just flip down to evolution
here's a nice little message from John
Paul the second by the way the Catholic
Church's is long-held that the physical
evidence the the chemical evidence of
the fossil evidence and the genetic
evidence point very very profoundly to a
good possibility of evolution it's it
goes all the way back really to Pope
Pius the 12th and Pope Pius the 12th and

English: 
simplistically what do you say to people
who do not believe in evolution or say
you're not a Christian if you believe in
evolution
besides laughs no I'm just kidding
no huh no I'm just kidding well I think
this III bring out you know John can you
actually flip over to John Paul the
second message to the Pontifical Academy
of Sciences it's one of the evolutionary
the you know just flip down to evolution
here's a nice little message from John
Paul the second by the way the Catholic
Church's is long-held that the physical
evidence the the chemical evidence of
the fossil evidence and the genetic
evidence point very very profoundly to a
good possibility of evolution it's it
goes all the way back really to Pope
Pius the 12th and Pope Pius the 12th and

Vietnamese: 
1951 I believe it was wrote an
encyclical called human EJ Norris
and what he indicated was that the
theory of evolution that Catholics could
believe in the theory of evolution so
long as they did not compromise on one
thing they couldn't compromise on God
creating a unique individual trans
material soul so you couldn't reduce a
human being to mere organic or physical
constituents you'd have to believe in a
soul so the idea would be then by the
way it's not hard to believe in a soul
have you seen that the three most recent
studies of near-death experiences you
know the one that was published in the
lancet by PIM van Lommel the one that
was published by Sam par Nia from the
University of Southampton right I mean
were you dealing with thousands of cases
that were monitored and so forth and so
trên

English: 
1951 I believe it was wrote an
encyclical called human EJ Norris
and what he indicated was that the
theory of evolution that Catholics could
believe in the theory of evolution so
long as they did not compromise on one
thing they couldn't compromise on God
creating a unique individual trans
material soul so you couldn't reduce a
human being to mere organic or physical
constituents you'd have to believe in a
soul so the idea would be then by the
way it's not hard to believe in a soul
have you seen that the three most recent
studies of near-death experiences you
know the one that was published in the
lancet by PIM van Lommel the one that
was published by Sam par Nia from the
University of Southampton right I mean
were you dealing with thousands of cases
that were monitored and so forth and so
on

Spanish: 
1951 I believe it was wrote an
encyclical called human EJ Norris
and what he indicated was that the
theory of evolution that Catholics could
believe in the theory of evolution so
long as they did not compromise on one
thing they couldn't compromise on God
creating a unique individual trans
material soul so you couldn't reduce a
human being to mere organic or physical
constituents you'd have to believe in a
soul so the idea would be then by the
way it's not hard to believe in a soul
have you seen that the three most recent
studies of near-death experiences you
know the one that was published in the
lancet by PIM van Lommel the one that
was published by Sam par Nia from the
University of Southampton right I mean
were you dealing with thousands of cases
that were monitored and so forth and so
en

French: 
1951 I believe it was wrote an
encyclical called human EJ Norris
and what he indicated was that the
theory of evolution that Catholics could
believe in the theory of evolution so
long as they did not compromise on one
thing they couldn't compromise on God
creating a unique individual trans
material soul so you couldn't reduce a
human being to mere organic or physical
constituents you'd have to believe in a
soul so the idea would be then by the
way it's not hard to believe in a soul
have you seen that the three most recent
studies of near-death experiences you
know the one that was published in the
lancet by PIM van Lommel the one that
was published by Sam par Nia from the
University of Southampton right I mean
were you dealing with thousands of cases
that were monitored and so forth and so
sur

Vietnamese: 
hey if you don't believe in the survival
of human consciousness after bodily
death and tell me one thing why do 80%
of blind people see for the first time
when they're clinically dead more than a
minute after they've had a heart attack
without any oxygen in their brain they
couldn't see in their material bodies to
begin with how can they see for the
first time when they're clinically dead
you explain that to me
and then I can tell you what why I
believe you know definitively that human
beings have a trans physical soul that
will survive Bali death but that's a
whole other story that was the only
condition that Pope Pius a12 established
for the you know belief in evolution
then john paul ii comes along and john
paul ii because he studied the fossil
genetic and chemical evidence basically
he comes and says it's more than a
hypothesis it really is closer we're
getting closer and closer to a validated

English: 
hey if you don't believe in the survival
of human consciousness after bodily
death and tell me one thing why do 80%
of blind people see for the first time
when they're clinically dead more than a
minute after they've had a heart attack
without any oxygen in their brain they
couldn't see in their material bodies to
begin with how can they see for the
first time when they're clinically dead
you explain that to me
and then I can tell you what why I
believe you know definitively that human
beings have a trans physical soul that
will survive Bali death but that's a
whole other story that was the only
condition that Pope Pius a12 established
for the you know belief in evolution
then john paul ii comes along and john
paul ii because he studied the fossil
genetic and chemical evidence basically
he comes and says it's more than a
hypothesis it really is closer we're
getting closer and closer to a validated

Spanish: 
hey if you don't believe in the survival
of human consciousness after bodily
death and tell me one thing why do 80%
of blind people see for the first time
when they're clinically dead more than a
minute after they've had a heart attack
without any oxygen in their brain they
couldn't see in their material bodies to
begin with how can they see for the
first time when they're clinically dead
you explain that to me
and then I can tell you what why I
believe you know definitively that human
beings have a trans physical soul that
will survive Bali death but that's a
whole other story that was the only
condition that Pope Pius a12 established
for the you know belief in evolution
then john paul ii comes along and john
paul ii because he studied the fossil
genetic and chemical evidence basically
he comes and says it's more than a
hypothesis it really is closer we're
getting closer and closer to a validated

French: 
hey if you don't believe in the survival
of human consciousness after bodily
death and tell me one thing why do 80%
of blind people see for the first time
when they're clinically dead more than a
minute after they've had a heart attack
without any oxygen in their brain they
couldn't see in their material bodies to
begin with how can they see for the
first time when they're clinically dead
you explain that to me
and then I can tell you what why I
believe you know definitively that human
beings have a trans physical soul that
will survive Bali death but that's a
whole other story that was the only
condition that Pope Pius a12 established
for the you know belief in evolution
then john paul ii comes along and john
paul ii because he studied the fossil
genetic and chemical evidence basically
he comes and says it's more than a
hypothesis it really is closer we're
getting closer and closer to a validated

Vietnamese: 
theory and the evidence really is there
for that and there's no dispute with the
bible and i'm going to talk about that
in one second can people though can
somebody read that for the audience the
eyes are not good enough to read it but
it's just a quick summary of what he
says
the two quotes yeah taking into account
the scientific research of the era and
also the proper requirements of theology
the encyclical Humana generous treated
the doctrine of evolutionism has a
serious hypothesis worthy of
investigation and serious study
alongside the opposite hypothesis today
some new findings lead us toward the
recognition of evolution as more than a
hypothesis the convergence and the
results of new multidisciplinary studies

French: 
theory and the evidence really is there
for that and there's no dispute with the
bible and i'm going to talk about that
in one second can people though can
somebody read that for the audience the
eyes are not good enough to read it but
it's just a quick summary of what he
says
the two quotes yeah taking into account
the scientific research of the era and
also the proper requirements of theology
the encyclical Humana generous treated
the doctrine of evolutionism has a
serious hypothesis worthy of
investigation and serious study
alongside the opposite hypothesis today
some new findings lead us toward the
recognition of evolution as more than a
hypothesis the convergence and the
results of new multidisciplinary studies

Spanish: 
theory and the evidence really is there
for that and there's no dispute with the
bible and i'm going to talk about that
in one second can people though can
somebody read that for the audience the
eyes are not good enough to read it but
it's just a quick summary of what he
dice
the two quotes yeah taking into account
the scientific research of the era and
also the proper requirements of theology
the encyclical Humana generous treated
the doctrine of evolutionism has a
serious hypothesis worthy of
investigation and serious study
alongside the opposite hypothesis today
some new findings lead us toward the
recognition of evolution as more than a
hypothesis the convergence and the
results of new multidisciplinary studies

English: 
theory and the evidence really is there
for that and there's no dispute with the
bible and i'm going to talk about that
in one second can people though can
somebody read that for the audience the
eyes are not good enough to read it but
it's just a quick summary of what he
says
the two quotes yeah taking into account
the scientific research of the era and
also the proper requirements of theology
the encyclical Humana generous treated
the doctrine of evolutionism has a
serious hypothesis worthy of
investigation and serious study
alongside the opposite hypothesis today
some new findings lead us toward the
recognition of evolution as more than a
hypothesis the convergence and the
results of new multidisciplinary studies

English: 
constitutes in itself a significant
argument in favor of the theory in favor
of the theory so that's our own Pope
John Paul a second
I think Catholics are very free to
believe in it I think the evidence
points to it that the problem of course
is the seeming contradiction between the
Bible and the theory of evolution
it was the same pope Pope Pius the 12th
that actually wrote another encyclical
back end I believe it was 1942 and it
was called Divino Allante Spiritu and we
have a little slide on that this is a
good little encyclical to sort of take
note of because at that point Pope Pius
the 12th declared that Catholics
essentially hold that you know what the
theory of inspiration is so how does God
inspire the biblical author there's a
so-called dictation theory and there's
also the so called collaborative theory
what Pope Pius the 12th is said is that
Catholics hold to the collaborative

French: 
constitutes in itself a significant
argument in favor of the theory in favor
of the theory so that's our own Pope
John Paul a second
I think Catholics are very free to
believe in it I think the evidence
points to it that the problem of course
is the seeming contradiction between the
Bible and the theory of evolution
it was the same pope Pope Pius the 12th
that actually wrote another encyclical
back end I believe it was 1942 and it
was called Divino Allante Spiritu and we
have a little slide on that this is a
good little encyclical to sort of take
note of because at that point Pope Pius
the 12th declared that Catholics
essentially hold that you know what the
theory of inspiration is so how does God
inspire the biblical author there's a
so-called dictation theory and there's
also the so called collaborative theory
what Pope Pius the 12th is said is that
Catholics hold to the collaborative

Spanish: 
constitutes in itself a significant
argument in favor of the theory in favor
of the theory so that's our own Pope
John Paul a second
I think Catholics are very free to
believe in it I think the evidence
points to it that the problem of course
is the seeming contradiction between the
Bible and the theory of evolution
it was the same pope Pope Pius the 12th
that actually wrote another encyclical
back end I believe it was 1942 and it
was called Divino Allante Spiritu and we
have a little slide on that this is a
good little encyclical to sort of take
note of because at that point Pope Pius
the 12th declared that Catholics
essentially hold that you know what the
theory of inspiration is so how does God
inspire the biblical author there's a
so-called dictation theory and there's
also the so called collaborative theory
what Pope Pius the 12th is said is that
Catholics hold to the collaborative

Vietnamese: 
constitutes in itself a significant
argument in favor of the theory in favor
of the theory so that's our own Pope
John Paul a second
I think Catholics are very free to
believe in it I think the evidence
points to it that the problem of course
is the seeming contradiction between the
Bible and the theory of evolution
it was the same pope Pope Pius the 12th
that actually wrote another encyclical
back end I believe it was 1942 and it
was called Divino Allante Spiritu and we
have a little slide on that this is a
good little encyclical to sort of take
note of because at that point Pope Pius
the 12th declared that Catholics
essentially hold that you know what the
theory of inspiration is so how does God
inspire the biblical author there's a
so-called dictation theory and there's
also the so called collaborative theory
what Pope Pius the 12th is said is that
Catholics hold to the collaborative

English: 
theory of inspiration that means that
when God speaks to the biblical author
God does not go to somebody in 500 BC
and go biblical author I'm gonna dictate
something to you just take this down
this is how it went in the beginning
there was a cosmic space-time geometry
configuration that burst into existence
along with quantum dynamics
where the four forces were unified in a
single microcosm after 10 to the minus
24 seconds the first force the
gravitational force rolled off and
became a space-time continuum and then
the strong nuclear force rolled off 10
to the minus 16th of a second later and

French: 
theory of inspiration that means that
when God speaks to the biblical author
God does not go to somebody in 500 BC
and go biblical author I'm gonna dictate
something to you just take this down
this is how it went in the beginning
there was a cosmic space-time geometry
configuration that burst into existence
along with quantum dynamics
where the four forces were unified in a
single microcosm after 10 to the minus
24 seconds the first force the
gravitational force rolled off and
became a space-time continuum and then
the strong nuclear force rolled off 10
to the minus 16th of a second later and

Vietnamese: 
theory of inspiration that means that
when God speaks to the biblical author
God does not go to somebody in 500 BC
and go biblical author I'm gonna dictate
something to you just take this down
this is how it went in the beginning
there was a cosmic space-time geometry
configuration that burst into existence
along with quantum dynamics
where the four forces were unified in a
single microcosm after 10 to the minus
24 seconds the first force the
gravitational force rolled off and
became a space-time continuum and then
the strong nuclear force rolled off 10
to the minus 16th of a second later and

Spanish: 
theory of inspiration that means that
when God speaks to the biblical author
God does not go to somebody in 500 BC
and go biblical author I'm gonna dictate
something to you just take this down
this is how it went in the beginning
there was a cosmic space-time geometry
configuration that burst into existence
along with quantum dynamics
where the four forces were unified in a
single microcosm after 10 to the minus
24 seconds the first force the
gravitational force rolled off and
became a space-time continuum and then
the strong nuclear force rolled off 10
to the minus 16th of a second later and

Vietnamese: 
that left the electoral weak force which
finally separated and then but once the
electroweak force separated the
electromagnetic forces burst into a fine
energy which moved through a Higgs ian's
field and when it did so acquired rest
mass and the rest mass immediately gave
rise to a pool of quarks which later
became protons and neutrons eventually
emerging and stellar nucleosynthesis and
all of the galaxies of the universe that
poor biblical author he wouldn't have
understood a thing that God was saying
it wouldn't have worked so what it plans
to 12:00 say that's not the picture what
is the point of the Bible and what is
the point of God inspiring the biblical
author to give truths of salvation to

English: 
that left the electoral weak force which
finally separated and then but once the
electroweak force separated the
electromagnetic forces burst into a fine
energy which moved through a Higgs ian's
field and when it did so acquired rest
mass and the rest mass immediately gave
rise to a pool of quarks which later
became protons and neutrons eventually
emerging and stellar nucleosynthesis and
all of the galaxies of the universe that
poor biblical author he wouldn't have
understood a thing that God was saying
it wouldn't have worked so what it plans
to 12:00 say that's not the picture what
is the point of the Bible and what is
the point of God inspiring the biblical
author to give truths of salvation to

Spanish: 
that left the electoral weak force which
finally separated and then but once the
electroweak force separated the
electromagnetic forces burst into a fine
energy which moved through a Higgs ian's
field and when it did so acquired rest
mass and the rest mass immediately gave
rise to a pool of quarks which later
became protons and neutrons eventually
emerging and stellar nucleosynthesis and
all of the galaxies of the universe that
poor biblical author he wouldn't have
understood a thing that God was saying
it wouldn't have worked so what it plans
to 12:00 say that's not the picture what
is the point of the Bible and what is
the point of God inspiring the biblical
author to give truths of salvation to

French: 
that left the electoral weak force which
finally separated and then but once the
electroweak force separated the
electromagnetic forces burst into a fine
energy which moved through a Higgs ian's
field and when it did so acquired rest
mass and the rest mass immediately gave
rise to a pool of quarks which later
became protons and neutrons eventually
emerging and stellar nucleosynthesis and
all of the galaxies of the universe that
poor biblical author he wouldn't have
understood a thing that God was saying
it wouldn't have worked so what it plans
to 12:00 say that's not the picture what
is the point of the Bible and what is
the point of God inspiring the biblical
author to give truths of salvation to

English: 
give sacred truths necessary for
salvation how much of what I just said
of the contemporary physical account of
creation how much of that is necessary
for your salvation you got it zero what
is necessary for your salvation is what
the biblical author said in the
categories and the structures and the
concepts of his culture and in his time
the biblical author is wrestling with
all of these other competitive myths
right these so-called epics of creation
like the Gilgamesh epic and of course
they've got many God
so what does the biblical author come
back with one god and then of course
they got the nature is you know is God
like so you got to see God and the Sun

Vietnamese: 
give sacred truths necessary for
salvation how much of what I just said
of the contemporary physical account of
creation how much of that is necessary
for your salvation you got it zero what
is necessary for your salvation is what
the biblical author said in the
categories and the structures and the
concepts of his culture and in his time
the biblical author is wrestling with
all of these other competitive myths
right these so-called epics of creation
like the Gilgamesh epic and of course
they've got many God
so what does the biblical author come
back with one god and then of course
they got the nature is you know is God
like so you got to see God and the Sun

French: 
give sacred truths necessary for
salvation how much of what I just said
of the contemporary physical account of
creation how much of that is necessary
for your salvation you got it zero what
is necessary for your salvation is what
the biblical author said in the
categories and the structures and the
concepts of his culture and in his time
the biblical author is wrestling with
all of these other competitive myths
right these so-called epics of creation
like the Gilgamesh epic and of course
they've got many God
so what does the biblical author come
back with one god and then of course
they got the nature is you know is God
like so you got to see God and the Sun

Spanish: 
give sacred truths necessary for
salvation how much of what I just said
of the contemporary physical account of
creation how much of that is necessary
for your salvation you got it zero what
is necessary for your salvation is what
the biblical author said in the
categories and the structures and the
concepts of his culture and in his time
the biblical author is wrestling with
all of these other competitive myths
right these so-called epics of creation
like the Gilgamesh epic and of course
they've got many God
so what does the biblical author come
back with one god and then of course
they got the nature is you know is God
like so you got to see God and the Sun

Spanish: 
God and the earth God and all kinds of
the biblical egos no way it's just one
God and everything else is a creation
now how right he is of course according
to the physics of our day whether course
necessary for salvation is none of these
natural things are God's
they're just creations of God there's
but one God I mean I think it's so
remarkably stunning than you know the
third thing that he says and of course
contra to the Gilgamesh epic is that
human beings are literally created and
made in the image and likeness of God
they have divine value have divine value
you are not cannon fodder and playthings
for the gods as in the Gilgamesh epic
right so the key thing right is he's
giving these true the salvation which
are still truths of salvation for us
today but to try said Pope Pius the 12th
to make the poor biblical author into a
scientist is ridiculous it has nothing
to do with salvation it doesn't

Vietnamese: 
God and the earth God and all kinds of
the biblical egos no way it's just one
God and everything else is a creation
now how right he is of course according
to the physics of our day whether course
necessary for salvation is none of these
natural things are God's
they're just creations of God there's
but one God I mean I think it's so
remarkably stunning than you know the
third thing that he says and of course
contra to the Gilgamesh epic is that
human beings are literally created and
made in the image and likeness of God
they have divine value have divine value
you are not cannon fodder and playthings
for the gods as in the Gilgamesh epic
right so the key thing right is he's
giving these true the salvation which
are still truths of salvation for us
today but to try said Pope Pius the 12th
to make the poor biblical author into a
scientist is ridiculous it has nothing
to do with salvation it doesn't

English: 
God and the earth God and all kinds of
the biblical egos no way it's just one
God and everything else is a creation
now how right he is of course according
to the physics of our day whether course
necessary for salvation is none of these
natural things are God's
they're just creations of God there's
but one God I mean I think it's so
remarkably stunning than you know the
third thing that he says and of course
contra to the Gilgamesh epic is that
human beings are literally created and
made in the image and likeness of God
they have divine value have divine value
you are not cannon fodder and playthings
for the gods as in the Gilgamesh epic
right so the key thing right is he's
giving these true the salvation which
are still truths of salvation for us
today but to try said Pope Pius the 12th
to make the poor biblical author into a
scientist is ridiculous it has nothing
to do with salvation it doesn't

French: 
God and the earth God and all kinds of
the biblical egos no way it's just one
God and everything else is a creation
now how right he is of course according
to the physics of our day whether course
necessary for salvation is none of these
natural things are God's
they're just creations of God there's
but one God I mean I think it's so
remarkably stunning than you know the
third thing that he says and of course
contra to the Gilgamesh epic is that
human beings are literally created and
made in the image and likeness of God
they have divine value have divine value
you are not cannon fodder and playthings
for the gods as in the Gilgamesh epic
right so the key thing right is he's
giving these true the salvation which
are still truths of salvation for us
today but to try said Pope Pius the 12th
to make the poor biblical author into a
scientist is ridiculous it has nothing
to do with salvation it doesn't

Vietnamese: 
correspond you know to the capacities
and the culture of the biblical author
they need to hear the words of salvation
back then as much as we need to hear it
today and in this scientific age right
remember the old thought of st. Thomas
Aquinas quit quit rich if interest rate
if you're a motor recipient whatever is
received is received in the manner of
the receiver
you can't give physics to a guy who's
never heard of calculus won't work so
the idea of a dictation theory or a
literalist theory of inspiration is not
we just don't hold it as Catholic we do
have very good evangelical brethren and
some of whom all to a young earth view
and hold to this view that's fine I mean
they believe in the essential thing God
the creation the soul you know I can
discourse with those guys I don't think
I have to force them

Spanish: 
correspond you know to the capacities
and the culture of the biblical author
they need to hear the words of salvation
back then as much as we need to hear it
today and in this scientific age right
remember the old thought of st. Thomas
Aquinas quit quit rich if interest rate
if you're a motor recipient whatever is
received is received in the manner of
the receiver
you can't give physics to a guy who's
never heard of calculus won't work so
the idea of a dictation theory or a
literalist theory of inspiration is not
we just don't hold it as Catholic we do
have very good evangelical brethren and
some of whom all to a young earth view
and hold to this view that's fine I mean
they believe in the essential thing God
the creation the soul you know I can
discourse with those guys I don't think
I have to force them

French: 
correspond you know to the capacities
and the culture of the biblical author
they need to hear the words of salvation
back then as much as we need to hear it
today and in this scientific age right
remember the old thought of st. Thomas
Aquinas quit quit rich if interest rate
if you're a motor recipient whatever is
received is received in the manner of
the receiver
you can't give physics to a guy who's
never heard of calculus won't work so
the idea of a dictation theory or a
literalist theory of inspiration is not
we just don't hold it as Catholic we do
have very good evangelical brethren and
some of whom all to a young earth view
and hold to this view that's fine I mean
they believe in the essential thing God
the creation the soul you know I can
discourse with those guys I don't think
I have to force them

English: 
correspond you know to the capacities
and the culture of the biblical author
they need to hear the words of salvation
back then as much as we need to hear it
today and in this scientific age right
remember the old thought of st. Thomas
Aquinas quit quit rich if interest rate
if you're a motor recipient whatever is
received is received in the manner of
the receiver
you can't give physics to a guy who's
never heard of calculus won't work so
the idea of a dictation theory or a
literalist theory of inspiration is not
we just don't hold it as Catholic we do
have very good evangelical brethren and
some of whom all to a young earth view
and hold to this view that's fine I mean
they believe in the essential thing God
the creation the soul you know I can
discourse with those guys I don't think
I have to force them

Vietnamese: 
to it but for all intents and purposes I
have got very good reasons to believe in
evolution scientifically which my church
does not refute and it doesn't have to
be refuted because of course the Bible
is not there giving scientific church
science gives physical descriptions and
explanations of the universe as we know
nó
theology and biblical exegesis is meant
to do one thing give sacred truths
necessary for salvation let science be
science and let theology be theology and
we'll all just be happy and that's I
think the short answer to your good
question thank you I think we ran that
or should we have one more okay one more
excuse me
we understand since the beginning of
recorded human history we accept the

Spanish: 
to it but for all intents and purposes I
have got very good reasons to believe in
evolution scientifically which my church
does not refute and it doesn't have to
be refuted because of course the Bible
is not there giving scientific church
science gives physical descriptions and
explanations of the universe as we know
eso
theology and biblical exegesis is meant
to do one thing give sacred truths
necessary for salvation let science be
science and let theology be theology and
we'll all just be happy and that's I
think the short answer to your good
question thank you I think we ran that
or should we have one more okay one more
Perdóneme
we understand since the beginning of
recorded human history we accept the

French: 
to it but for all intents and purposes I
have got very good reasons to believe in
evolution scientifically which my church
does not refute and it doesn't have to
be refuted because of course the Bible
is not there giving scientific church
science gives physical descriptions and
explanations of the universe as we know
il
theology and biblical exegesis is meant
to do one thing give sacred truths
necessary for salvation let science be
science and let theology be theology and
we'll all just be happy and that's I
think the short answer to your good
question thank you I think we ran that
or should we have one more okay one more
excuse me
we understand since the beginning of
recorded human history we accept the

English: 
to it but for all intents and purposes I
have got very good reasons to believe in
evolution scientifically which my church
does not refute and it doesn't have to
be refuted because of course the Bible
is not there giving scientific church
science gives physical descriptions and
explanations of the universe as we know
it
theology and biblical exegesis is meant
to do one thing give sacred truths
necessary for salvation let science be
science and let theology be theology and
we'll all just be happy and that's I
think the short answer to your good
question thank you I think we ran that
or should we have one more okay one more
excuse me
we understand since the beginning of
recorded human history we accept the

English: 
physical laws as we understand them to
be universal they're unchanging
throughout our universe we also know
from many recent discoveries that there
are literally thousands of planets in
our universe that are in the temperate
zone that will support life that's sure
so we can say with a high degree of
probability that life exists elsewhere
in our universe that's true that life is
as human life or if it is intelligent
life we don't know is there any any are
there any theories regarding the
existence of intelligent life elsewhere
in the universe that is endowed with a
soul in the sense that humans are if

French: 
physical laws as we understand them to
be universal they're unchanging
throughout our universe we also know
from many recent discoveries that there
are literally thousands of planets in
our universe that are in the temperate
zone that will support life that's sure
so we can say with a high degree of
probability that life exists elsewhere
in our universe that's true that life is
as human life or if it is intelligent
life we don't know is there any any are
there any theories regarding the
existence of intelligent life elsewhere
in the universe that is endowed with a
soul in the sense that humans are if

Spanish: 
physical laws as we understand them to
be universal they're unchanging
throughout our universe we also know
from many recent discoveries that there
are literally thousands of planets in
our universe that are in the temperate
zone that will support life that's sure
so we can say with a high degree of
probability that life exists elsewhere
in our universe that's true that life is
as human life or if it is intelligent
life we don't know is there any any are
there any theories regarding the
existence of intelligent life elsewhere
in the universe that is endowed with a
soul in the sense that humans are if

Vietnamese: 
physical laws as we understand them to
be universal they're unchanging
throughout our universe we also know
from many recent discoveries that there
are literally thousands of planets in
our universe that are in the temperate
zone that will support life that's sure
so we can say with a high degree of
probability that life exists elsewhere
in our universe that's true that life is
as human life or if it is intelligent
life we don't know is there any any are
there any theories regarding the
existence of intelligent life elsewhere
in the universe that is endowed with a
soul in the sense that humans are if

Vietnamese: 
that is the case and is is a question is
heaven a universal community good good
question he joined can you just go to
those slides about the exoplanets and
you know but yeah an alien's yeah yeah
yes exactly what you have said is
correct there are literally at you know
probably somewhere in the neighborhood
of 10 to the 11th EXO flat planets in
the habitable zone out there which could
have certainly amino acids and certainly
could have lipids necessary for cell
walls and cell membranes and and
certainly could also have some kind of
nucleotides and ribosome extractor so
it's it's possible so as you correctly
said it's pretty clear that there's
probably some other life-forms out there
for sure but the key question is is
there are there intelligent life forms

English: 
that is the case and is is a question is
heaven a universal community good good
question he joined can you just go to
those slides about the exoplanets and
you know but yeah an alien's yeah yeah
yes exactly what you have said is
correct there are literally at you know
probably somewhere in the neighborhood
of 10 to the 11th EXO flat planets in
the habitable zone out there which could
have certainly amino acids and certainly
could have lipids necessary for cell
walls and cell membranes and and
certainly could also have some kind of
nucleotides and ribosome extractor so
it's it's possible so as you correctly
said it's pretty clear that there's
probably some other life-forms out there
for sure but the key question is is
there are there intelligent life forms

French: 
that is the case and is is a question is
heaven a universal community good good
question he joined can you just go to
those slides about the exoplanets and
you know but yeah an alien's yeah yeah
yes exactly what you have said is
correct there are literally at you know
probably somewhere in the neighborhood
of 10 to the 11th EXO flat planets in
the habitable zone out there which could
have certainly amino acids and certainly
could have lipids necessary for cell
walls and cell membranes and and
certainly could also have some kind of
nucleotides and ribosome extractor so
it's it's possible so as you correctly
said it's pretty clear that there's
probably some other life-forms out there
for sure but the key question is is
there are there intelligent life forms

Spanish: 
that is the case and is is a question is
heaven a universal community good good
question he joined can you just go to
those slides about the exoplanets and
you know but yeah an alien's yeah yeah
yes exactly what you have said is
correct there are literally at you know
probably somewhere in the neighborhood
of 10 to the 11th EXO flat planets in
the habitable zone out there which could
have certainly amino acids and certainly
could have lipids necessary for cell
walls and cell membranes and and
certainly could also have some kind of
nucleotides and ribosome extractor so
it's it's possible so as you correctly
said it's pretty clear that there's
probably some other life-forms out there
for sure but the key question is is
there are there intelligent life forms

English: 
out there and the answer is simply this
if god wants them to be they there are
and the reason you have to say it that
way is because intelligent life forms
like ours are not explicable in terms of
physical and biological laws alone there
are five huge problems with moving from
us from from a physical universe to us
as transcendental beings by the way I
have a brand new book coming out called
the soul's upward yearning concludes to
our transcendent nature from experience
and reason if you're interested in this
problem take a look at it but here are
the five big things number one those
near-death experiences I just mentioned
the evidence now is really getting so
good and contemporary neurologists and

Spanish: 
out there and the answer is simply this
if god wants them to be they there are
and the reason you have to say it that
way is because intelligent life forms
like ours are not explicable in terms of
physical and biological laws alone there
are five huge problems with moving from
us from from a physical universe to us
as transcendental beings by the way I
have a brand new book coming out called
the soul's upward yearning concludes to
our transcendent nature from experience
and reason if you're interested in this
problem take a look at it but here are
the five big things number one those
near-death experiences I just mentioned
the evidence now is really getting so
good and contemporary neurologists and

Vietnamese: 
out there and the answer is simply this
if god wants them to be they there are
and the reason you have to say it that
way is because intelligent life forms
like ours are not explicable in terms of
physical and biological laws alone there
are five huge problems with moving from
us from from a physical universe to us
as transcendental beings by the way I
have a brand new book coming out called
the soul's upward yearning concludes to
our transcendent nature from experience
and reason if you're interested in this
problem take a look at it but here are
the five big things number one those
near-death experiences I just mentioned
the evidence now is really getting so
good and contemporary neurologists and

French: 
out there and the answer is simply this
if god wants them to be they there are
and the reason you have to say it that
way is because intelligent life forms
like ours are not explicable in terms of
physical and biological laws alone there
are five huge problems with moving from
us from from a physical universe to us
as transcendental beings by the way I
have a brand new book coming out called
the soul's upward yearning concludes to
our transcendent nature from experience
and reason if you're interested in this
problem take a look at it but here are
the five big things number one those
near-death experiences I just mentioned
the evidence now is really getting so
good and contemporary neurologists and

French: 
neuroscientists are already seeing no
known physical theory can explain these
things no known physical theory is able
to explain accurate vertical perception
you know after clinical death sometimes
for up to over a half an hour
I mean how blind people 80% of blind
people can see after clinical death etc
so there's that's a problem you know how
we have a some kind of a soul some kind
of consciousness that is detachable from
our physical bodies if that other life
form is like us then that other life
form has physical class as consciousness
that's detachable from its physical body
but how could it have that because then
the universe couldn't explain its
consciousness because his consciousness
didn't emerge from its brain its
consciousness is detachable from its
brain and can exist after the death of
its physical brain God has to do it

Vietnamese: 
neuroscientists are already seeing no
known physical theory can explain these
things no known physical theory is able
to explain accurate vertical perception
you know after clinical death sometimes
for up to over a half an hour
I mean how blind people 80% of blind
people can see after clinical death etc
so there's that's a problem you know how
we have a some kind of a soul some kind
of consciousness that is detachable from
our physical bodies if that other life
form is like us then that other life
form has physical class as consciousness
that's detachable from its physical body
but how could it have that because then
the universe couldn't explain its
consciousness because his consciousness
didn't emerge from its brain its
consciousness is detachable from its
brain and can exist after the death of
its physical brain God has to do it

Spanish: 
neuroscientists are already seeing no
known physical theory can explain these
things no known physical theory is able
to explain accurate vertical perception
you know after clinical death sometimes
for up to over a half an hour
I mean how blind people 80% of blind
people can see after clinical death etc
so there's that's a problem you know how
we have a some kind of a soul some kind
of consciousness that is detachable from
our physical bodies if that other life
form is like us then that other life
form has physical class as consciousness
that's detachable from its physical body
but how could it have that because then
the universe couldn't explain its
consciousness because his consciousness
didn't emerge from its brain its
consciousness is detachable from its
brain and can exist after the death of
its physical brain God has to do it

English: 
neuroscientists are already seeing no
known physical theory can explain these
things no known physical theory is able
to explain accurate vertical perception
you know after clinical death sometimes
for up to over a half an hour
I mean how blind people 80% of blind
people can see after clinical death etc
so there's that's a problem you know how
we have a some kind of a soul some kind
of consciousness that is detachable from
our physical bodies if that other life
form is like us then that other life
form has physical class as consciousness
that's detachable from its physical body
but how could it have that because then
the universe couldn't explain its
consciousness because his consciousness
didn't emerge from its brain its
consciousness is detachable from its
brain and can exist after the death of
its physical brain God has to do it

Vietnamese: 
biology physics science can't do it
number two there's this little theorem
called Kendall's theorem Jarrell was aa
Kirk is a German mathematician who had a
very interesting proof girls proof and
by the way if you want to know all about
girls proof where would you go
to find out about magis Sanner dot-com
precisely but what he showed was that
human beings mathematically are trans
algorithmic that is to say we do not
need any kind of rules or algorithms in
order for us to function mathematically
to invent a new theorem we are already
beyond any known theorem we can leap
ahead without making recourse to past
algorithms and of course past algorithms
will never explain new mathematical
theorems we are trans algorithmic
mathematical thinkers and if you're
going to explain that you're gonna have
to get beyond algorithms and if you get

French: 
biology physics science can't do it
number two there's this little theorem
called Kendall's theorem Jarrell was aa
Kirk is a German mathematician who had a
very interesting proof girls proof and
by the way if you want to know all about
girls proof where would you go
to find out about magis Sanner dot-com
precisely but what he showed was that
human beings mathematically are trans
algorithmic that is to say we do not
need any kind of rules or algorithms in
order for us to function mathematically
to invent a new theorem we are already
beyond any known theorem we can leap
ahead without making recourse to past
algorithms and of course past algorithms
will never explain new mathematical
theorems we are trans algorithmic
mathematical thinkers and if you're
going to explain that you're gonna have
to get beyond algorithms and if you get

English: 
biology physics science can't do it
number two there's this little theorem
called Kendall's theorem Jarrell was a a
Kirk is a German mathematician who had a
very interesting proof girls proof and
by the way if you want to know all about
girls proof where would you go
to find out about magis Sanner dot-com
precisely but what he showed was that
human beings mathematically are trans
algorithmic that is to say we do not
need any kind of rules or algorithms in
order for us to function mathematically
to invent a new theorem we are already
beyond any known theorem we can leap
ahead without making recourse to past
algorithms and of course past algorithms
will never explain new mathematical
theorems we are trans algorithmic
mathematical thinkers and if you're
going to explain that you're gonna have
to get beyond algorithms and if you get

Spanish: 
biology physics science can't do it
number two there's this little theorem
called Kendall's theorem Jarrell was aa
Kirk is a German mathematician who had a
very interesting proof girls proof and
by the way if you want to know all about
girls proof where would you go
to find out about magis Sanner dot-com
precisely but what he showed was that
human beings mathematically are trans
algorithmic that is to say we do not
need any kind of rules or algorithms in
order for us to function mathematically
to invent a new theorem we are already
beyond any known theorem we can leap
ahead without making recourse to past
algorithms and of course past algorithms
will never explain new mathematical
theorems we are trans algorithmic
mathematical thinkers and if you're
going to explain that you're gonna have
to get beyond algorithms and if you get

Vietnamese: 
beyond algorithms you're gonna have to
get beyond not just physical processes
like classical physical processes you're
going to have to get beyond quantum
physical processes this is a fascinating
thing you little ultimate eyes errs you
you are capable on number three this
came out from Plato 2,400 years ago
human beings have a desire and an
awareness of perfect truth perfect love
perfect goodness perfect beauty and
perfect home that's what we want
we don't want just any love we love
perfectly we don't want any just any
justice or good as well perfect fairness
and good we don't want just for we want
perfect yours we don't want imperfect
truth right rack our brains to solve
every kind of question we my little
nieces right they want the complete set
of correct answers to the complete set
of questions Uncle Bobby why is this
because of dad well why is that because
of this other thing and why is that and

Spanish: 
beyond algorithms you're gonna have to
get beyond not just physical processes
like classical physical processes you're
going to have to get beyond quantum
physical processes this is a fascinating
thing you little ultimate eyes errs you
you are capable on number three this
came out from Plato 2,400 years ago
human beings have a desire and an
awareness of perfect truth perfect love
perfect goodness perfect beauty and
perfect home that's what we want
we don't want just any love we love
perfectly we don't want any just any
justice or good as well perfect fairness
and good we don't want just for we want
perfect yours we don't want imperfect
truth right rack our brains to solve
every kind of question we my little
nieces right they want the complete set
of correct answers to the complete set
of questions Uncle Bobby why is this
because of dad well why is that because
of this other thing and why is that and

English: 
beyond algorithms you're gonna have to
get beyond not just physical processes
like classical physical processes you're
going to have to get beyond quantum
physical processes this is a fascinating
thing you little ultimate eyes errs you
you are capable on number three this
came out from Plato 2,400 years ago
human beings have a desire and an
awareness of perfect truth perfect love
perfect goodness perfect beauty and
perfect home that's what we want
we don't want just any love we love
perfectly we don't want any just any
justice or good as well perfect fairness
and good we don't want just for we want
perfect yours we don't want imperfect
truth right rack our brains to solve
every kind of question we my little
nieces right they want the complete set
of correct answers to the complete set
of questions Uncle Bobby why is this
because of dad well why is that because
of this other thing and why is that and

French: 
beyond algorithms you're gonna have to
get beyond not just physical processes
like classical physical processes you're
going to have to get beyond quantum
physical processes this is a fascinating
thing you little ultimate eyes errs you
you are capable on number three this
came out from Plato 2,400 years ago
human beings have a desire and an
awareness of perfect truth perfect love
perfect goodness perfect beauty and
perfect home that's what we want
we don't want just any love we love
perfectly we don't want any just any
justice or good as well perfect fairness
and good we don't want just for we want
perfect yours we don't want imperfect
truth right rack our brains to solve
every kind of question we my little
nieces right they want the complete set
of correct answers to the complete set
of questions Uncle Bobby why is this
because of dad well why is that because
of this other thing and why is that and

Vietnamese: 
finally you've got to tell them timeout
because you're in the deepest modes of
quantum theory I mean it's just yeah
honestly we are ultimate that we are
transcendent beings we're seeking the
transcend we're seeking the perfect and
truth goodness just as beauty an omen
you can't explain that with physical
theories number four I won't just won't
get into the to the whole thing there's
a thing called the hard problem of
consciousness by David Chalmers but read
my book that the souls upward yearning
the point I'm trying to get to is these
five things make you qualitatively
different from any physical and I mean
classical physical and quantum physical
process looks like you've got a soul and
if any alien life-form is like us
they're thinking about God they're
thinking about perfect love they're
doing good alien trans algorithmic
mathematics they're capable of surviving
bodily death or consciousness and you

French: 
finally you've got to tell them timeout
because you're in the deepest modes of
quantum theory I mean it's just yeah
honestly we are ultimate that we are
transcendent beings we're seeking the
transcend we're seeking the perfect and
truth goodness just as beauty an omen
you can't explain that with physical
theories number four I won't just won't
get into the to the whole thing there's
a thing called the hard problem of
consciousness by David Chalmers but read
my book that the souls upward yearning
the point I'm trying to get to is these
five things make you qualitatively
different from any physical and I mean
classical physical and quantum physical
process looks like you've got a soul and
if any alien life-form is like us
they're thinking about God they're
thinking about perfect love they're
doing good alien trans algorithmic
mathematics they're capable of surviving
bodily death or consciousness and you

Spanish: 
finally you've got to tell them timeout
because you're in the deepest modes of
quantum theory I mean it's just yeah
honestly we are ultimate that we are
transcendent beings we're seeking the
transcend we're seeking the perfect and
truth goodness just as beauty an omen
you can't explain that with physical
theories number four I won't just won't
get into the to the whole thing there's
a thing called the hard problem of
consciousness by David Chalmers but read
my book that the souls upward yearning
the point I'm trying to get to is these
five things make you qualitatively
different from any physical and I mean
classical physical and quantum physical
process looks like you've got a soul and
if any alien life-form is like us
they're thinking about God they're
thinking about perfect love they're
doing good alien trans algorithmic
mathematics they're capable of surviving
bodily death or consciousness and you

English: 
finally you've got to tell them timeout
because you're in the deepest modes of
quantum theory I mean it's just yeah
honestly we are ultimate that we are
transcendent beings we're seeking the
transcend we're seeking the perfect and
truth goodness just as beauty an omen
you can't explain that with physical
theories number four I won't just won't
get into the to the whole thing there's
a thing called the hard problem of
consciousness by David Chalmers but read
my book that the souls upward yearning
the point I'm trying to get to is these
five things make you qualitatively
different from any physical and I mean
classical physical and quantum physical
process looks like you've got a soul and
if any alien life-form is like us
they're thinking about God they're
thinking about perfect love they're
doing good alien trans algorithmic
mathematics they're capable of surviving
bodily death or consciousness and you

French: 
spot one of those babies I would say
first thing assume God created them with
a soul
second thing catechism third baptized
them because they're ready they are
literally like us transcendent beings
really really great question thanks
Tout le monde
thank you father Robert we're very
honored to have you it's a very
beautiful day to have you here today
we're going to have a little reception
afterwards there's books available for
you thank you Father
that's yet

English: 
spot one of those babies I would say
first thing assume God created them with
a soul
second thing catechism third baptized
them because they're ready they are
literally like us transcendent beings
really really great question thanks
everybody
thank you father Robert we're very
honored to have you it's a very
beautiful day to have you here today
we're going to have a little reception
afterwards there's books available for
you thank you Father
that's yet

Spanish: 
spot one of those babies I would say
first thing assume God created them with
a soul
second thing catechism third baptized
them because they're ready they are
literally like us transcendent beings
really really great question thanks
todos
thank you father Robert we're very
honored to have you it's a very
beautiful day to have you here today
we're going to have a little reception
afterwards there's books available for
you thank you Father
that's yet

Vietnamese: 
spot one of those babies I would say
first thing assume God created them with
a soul
second thing catechism third baptized
them because they're ready they are
literally like us transcendent beings
really really great question thanks
mọi người
thank you father Robert we're very
honored to have you it's a very
beautiful day to have you here today
we're going to have a little reception
afterwards there's books available for
you thank you Father
that's yet
