This video is sponsored by Squarespace, the
Best way to make an amazing website!
So as you guys all know, Apple is switching
out the Intel processors in all of their Macs
with their own in-house Apple Silicon SoCs
starting later this year, and I’ve been
digging deep into Apple’s developer tutorial
videos to try and find out how much of an
impact this is gonna have.
And from the looks of it, everything is about
to change for the better, and not in a minor
way.
In this video, I’m gonna discuss how Intel
has been holding Apple Macs back over the
past few years, I’m gonna talk about Intel’s
disappointing outlook on the future, I’m
gonna discuss why Apple’s decision to switch
to Apple Silicon is the best case scenario,
and I’m also gonna show you guys very impressive
tweets from real app developers and what they
have to say about Apple Silicon so far.
So let’s start off with Intel’s past in
terms of supporting Apple devices, but first,
let me give you a word from our sponsor, Squarespace.
If you've been thinking about making your
own website, Squarespace is seriously the
best way to go.
I built an engaging website for my wife's
cleaning business with literally no web-making
experience. You just choose a template, customize
blocks of text and images and easily move
them around.
It's incredibly simple, affordable, and it's
been running flawlessly for almost two years,
bringing in new clients thanks to its built-in
SEO tools.
So whether you're making a website for a small
business or for LITERALLY anything else, go
to squarespace.com for a free trial, and use
our custom link below when you're ready to
launch to save 10% on your first purchase
of a website or domain!
The trouble started in 2013, when Intel claimed
it could produce 10nm chips by 2015. Then
they delayed it to 2016, and then late 2017,
and then late 2019, and here we are in 2020,
and we’re only now finally seeing some good
mainstream 10nm chips.
So that’s a 5 year delay from when Intel
originally claimed their 10nm process would
be ready.
As many of you may know, Apple’s MacBook
Pros have been experiencing overheating issues
in recent years, and here’s why.
While Intel was promising that their more
efficient 10nm processors would be coming
soon, Apple was working on their 2016 redesign
of the MacBook Pro, making it as thin as they
could possibly make it while packing awesome
performance.
Unfortunately, Intel’s 10nm processors weren’t
ready for the initial 2016 release of the
MacBook Pro, so Apple had to stick with Intel’s
old 14nm processors, which was fine for the
time being, but Apple and their MacBook Pros
thin and very limited cooling system weren’t
expecting Intel to delay 10nm for so long.
And when Intel started to increase core count
to keep up with AMD’s Ryzen processors,
the MacBook Pro started to throttle, really
bad, especially in 2018 with Intel’s 6-core
i9 processor.
This has caused Apple some very bad press
coverage, pushing users to believe that the
MacBook Pro can’t handle the heat of Intel’s
latest processors.
So the point I’m trying to make is that
if Intel actually had their 10nm process ready
in 2015 like they said they would, we may
have never seen massive overheating issues
on the MacBook Pro.
And just a few days ago, Intel released their
Q2 earnings report which caused their stock
price to absolutely tank, and inversely, their
chip rival AMD’s stock skyrocketed over
the same time period.
The reason Intel stocked tanked is because
they announced that their 7nm chips will be
delayed until 2022 or 2023.
And thanks to that news, Rosen Law Firm has
filed a class-action lawsuit against Intel
claiming that their investors suffered damage
due to Intel knowing their 7nm process has
major issues and instead of warning investors,
they misled them by continuing to give them
positive statements.
So in reality, it seems like Apple’s choice
to finally ditch Intel happened at just the
right time, because if Apple stuck with Intel,
all of this news would’ve also been very
bad for Apple’s stock price as well.
Apple’s decision to ditch Intel actually
started back in 2015.
According to an ex-intel principal engineer,
the bad quality assurance of Skylake was responsible
for Apple making the decision to ditch Intel.
He said that Apple became the number one filer
of problems of the skylake architecture.
And right now, the situation at Intel is so
bad that Intel’s chief engineering officer
will resign in just a few days, and Intel
is completely separating many of their engineering
units into various teams to try and stop this
issue from happening again.
And you know it’s bad when Intel themselves
are starting to talk about outsourcing their
future 6nm, 5nm and 3nm chips directly from
one of their rivals, TSMC, which means Intel
is starting to give up on their own foundry.
That’s basically like Chevy asking Ford
to make their future trucks for them because
they lost all confidence in their own factories.
So you might be asking, what does all of this
have to do with Apple and their new Apple
Silicon Macs?
Well, TSMC has been working with Apple since
2011 to build chips for their mobile devices
like the iPhone. In fact, every iPhone and
iPad chip since the A10 in the iPhone 7 has
been built exclusively by TSMC.
And if you look at this chart, the duo has
caused the iPhone to absolutely destroy in
terms of performance in recent years, especially
with the 2018 iPad Pro running on TSMC’s
7nm process.
And it’s already confirmed that the iPhone
12’s A14 chip is gonna be built by TSMC’s
brand new 5nm process, and that’s the same
process that Apple Silicon Macc chips will
be built on.
And the even better news is that TSMC is already
on the way to risk production of their future
3nm process in 2021, and it’s looking like
3nm will enter into mass production for Apple’s
2022 devices, including their Apple Silicon
Macs.
So it’s looking very likely that in 2022,
Intel will still be working on their 7nm chips
while TSMC already has their 3nm chips in
mass production, so Apple’s choice to ditch
Intel and go with TSMC and their own Apple
Silicon is obviously the best choice they
could’ve made.
The only question that remains is this, will
Apple Silicon actually be able to keep up
with the performance of Intel chips?
Well, the A12X in the iPad Pro from 2018 is
already outperforming Intel’s brand new
10nm i7 chip for the 2020 MacBook Pro, in
both processor performance and graphics performance.
And that’s with no active cooling at all.
And Apple has mentioned that their Apple Silicon
Macs chips will be scaled up to match the
enclosure of each of their Macs, which factors
in active cooling, so we can expect a lot
more performance.
Now as far as comparing the performance of
Intel and TSMC chips, what matters is the
transistor density, which greatly affects
performance per watt.
As you can see from this chart, Intel’s
new 10nm process which has just started to
hit new devices very recently, is measuring
at around 100 million transistors per square
millimeter.
TSMC’s 7nm+ EUV process is beating it around
115, and that’s the process that was used
to make the A13 chip in the iPhone 11 almost
a year ago.
And next month, we’re expecting Apple to
announce the iPhone 12 with the A14 chip,
which will be built on TSMC’s 5nm process
which has a measured transistor density of
around 171.3, so it’s around 73% more dense
than Intel’s new 10nm process.
And apparently, TSMC’s 3nm process in 2022
is estimated to have over 291 million transistors
per square millimeter, compared to Intel’s
7nm process possibly in 2023 which Intel claimed
would have around 2.4x the density of their
10nm process, so that’s gonna be around
240 compared to TSMC’s 291.
And back in April, TSMC already started development
of their future 2nm process.
So what I’m trying to say is that Apple
is in a much better spot by switching to their
own Apple Silicon chips which are manufactured
by TSMC, especially since Intel has a long
track record of delaying their chips.
So now that we’ve settled all of that, let’s
discuss Apple’s controversial transition
from x86 Intel chips to ARM-based chips, which
some people believe will be a very rough transition
for developers and app support.
And to do this, let’s see what app developers
who have access to Apple’s Developer Transition
Kit which packs the ARM-Based A12Z chip from
the iPad Pro have to say about this transition.
App developer Longhorn recently said that
at this point, the first gen Apple Silicon
Macs will be faster at running x86 code than
an actual x86 chip.
He also revealed the code names of three new
Apple chips which are almost certainly for
Apple Silicon Macs, hinting at 3 new Macs
this year, possibly a MacBook Pro, MacBook
Air and a 24” iMac.
Senior Software Engineer at Disney Animation
mentioned that Rosetta 2 works shockingly
well, with absolutely no problem even with
complex code.
He then mentioned that the x86 version of
CMake runs perfectly well through Rosetta
2.
Yining received his Developer kit on July
2nd, and the very next day, he already had
his toy hobby rendering app ported over and
running natively on ARM macOS, with total
porting time taking only 5 hours.
He then mentioned that now that he has a real-world
workload running natively on both ARM and
Intel MacOS, she says that she’s 100% onboard
with this future. If this is Apple’s engineers
not even trying, then the upcoming real products
are going to be wild.
He also mentioned that his transition kit
stays cool to the touch on all surfaces while
running a scene with his hobby rendered, while
his wife’s 16” MacBook Pro gets really
hot.
He also said that his Intel-based Mac Mini
never stays cool to the touch under load.
Josh, who works as a creative tech at Netflix,
mentioned on July 3rd that he’s seeing many
accounts of things already running on Apple
Silicon across multiple languages.
The company OTOY mentioned that the GPU rendering
app Octane X will be fully optimized on day
1 for new Macs this year on Apple Silicon.
Samuel, who works for slack, has created a
launchable dev build off Electron JS for Apple
Silicon, which he said needed more work, and
less than two weeks later, he released another
working version for Apple Silicon.
Electron JS is an open source app that allows
you to build cross-platform desktop apps with
common code.
Steve Throughton Smith, another developer,
mentioned that after this year’s WWDC, the
way forward is a lot clearer than last year,
with a shared codebase across platforms with
universal purchase being ideal for most developers,
including Apple.
He was also able to easily scale his Mac audiobook
app to run on iOS, with all SwiftUI components
intact.
And another software developer praised SwiftUI,
saying that he wants to talk about this because
the transition is some of the most intriguing
and exciting stuff he’s ever seen.
Basically, the point that I’m trying to
make is that it’s only been a month since
developers got their hands on the developer
transition kit, and so far, a lot of developers
are extremely impressed with the performance
and compatibility of Apple Silicon, which
is the complete opposite of what everyone
else is saying.
So based on Apple working with TSMC to bring
top-of-the-line ARM chips to their Macs, combined
with developers already praising Apple Silicon,
especially the developer who said Rosetta
2 works much better than he expected for running
current x86 apps, this transition is gonna
be huge for Apple AND for its customers who
will be enjoying better performance and thermals
than on previous Intel Macs, for years into
the future.
Hopefully you learned something new from this
video, and if you did, go ahead and tap the
like button and click the circle above to
subscribe. And be sure to check out our Apple
Silicon ARM shirt right below this video.
Thanks for watching, and we’ll see you in
the next one!
