
Portuguese: 
Hm... é uma nova temporada.
Vamos tentar algo novo.
Vou responder
perguntas da platéia.
Pode ser divertido.
Tem alguém na platéia com uma pergunta?
Alguém na platéia
tem uma pergunta? Sim?
Aguarde um pouco até
o microfone chegar. Chegou.
- Qual é a sua pergunta
- Quando isso vai passar na TV?
Quando vai passar
na TV? Agora!
Tem outra pergunta?
Sim, ali, a menina de óculos.
- Você está usando calças?
- Se estou de calças?!
- Sim, você está sempre sentado atrás de uma mesa.
- Porque estou sentado aqui o tempo todo.
Acho que é realmente muito íntimo,
não diz respeito a você.
Uso meias!
Mas não vou falar das calças.
Outra pergunta? Ah, ali.
Como você vê o futuro
do capitalismo?
O futuro do capitalismo?!
É uma pergunta e tanto.
- Qual é o seu nome? - Suzane.
- Suzane, essa é uma boa pergunta!

Dutch: 
Eh... het is een nieuw seizoen.
We gaan iets nieuws proberen.
Ik ga bij publieksvragen
beantwoorden.
Ik ga wat publieksvragen
beantwoorden.
Dat is misschien wel leuk. Is er
iemand in het publiek met een vraag?
Heeft iemand een vraag in
het publiek? Ja?
Wacht even tot de microfoon er is.
Jij daar.
Wat is je vraag?
Wanneer komt het op tv.
Wanneer komt het op tv?
Ja. Nu!
Is er nog een vraag?
Ja, daar, meisje met die bril.
Heb je eigenlijk wel een broek aan?
Heb ik wel een broek aan?!
Ja, je zit altijd achter een bureau.
Omdat ik hier zo zit de hele tijd.
Dat vind ik eigenlijk te prive,
dat gaat je niks aan.
Ik heb wel sokken aan trouwens! Maar
van die broek ga ik niet vertellen.
En nog een vraag?
O, daar.
Hoe zie je de toekomst
van het kapitalisme?
De toekomst van het kapitalisme?!
Dat is nogal een vraag.
Hoe heet je? Suzanne.
Dat is nog een vraag!

English: 
It's a new season so we're going to try something new.
I'm going to answer a couple of questions from the audience.
That might be fun. Is there anyone in the audience with a question?
Ok let me see. Yea, wait a sec until the mic is there.
"When is this airing on TV?"
When is this airing on TV? Now!
Another question. Is there another question?
Let's see, yea there. The girl with the glasses
"Are you even wearing pants?"
Am I wearing pants? Because I'm always just sitting behind my desk?
That question is a bit too private. It doesn't concern you at all.
I am wearing socks though!
I'm not going to tell you about the pants.
Another question! Oh over there.
"How you see the future of capitalism?"
The future of capitalism?
What's your name? 
- "Suzanne."
That's quite a question.

Portuguese: 
Capitalismo, ó céus.
O que lembro da aula de economia:
tem dois sistemas importantes.
Tem o comunismo,
que é tolice,
onde UM provedor determina
tanto preço quanto oferta, tudo.
Não tem concorrência,
não há necessidade de melhorar.
Já existe
um carro elétrico Trabant?
É disso
que tô falando!
E também tem o capitalismo,
que é bom.
Livre mercado,
concorrência,
boas empresas lucram
e podem crescer,
e empresas que fazem
produtos ruins,
como os preservativos
Kees van der Staaij...
Vocês não conhecem?
Kees ("queijo") seguro!
É uma ideia boba,
então eles têm prejuízo e vão à falência,
é assim que o capitalismo funciona.
Por isso que aqui
temos capitalismo
e por isso que aqui
é tão confortável.
Mas, Suzane,
têm acontecido coisas
que não combinam
com o que aprendi.
Olha isso:
Uber registra a maior perda
de todos os tempos.
Perda de mais
de US$ 5 bilhões em 3 meses.

Dutch: 
Kapitalisme, ehm, jeetje.
Wat ik nog weet van economieles:
je hebt twee belangrijke systemen.
Je hebt communisme, dat is stom...
dan bepaalt EEN aanbieder de prijs
en het aanbod, alles.
Je hebt geen concurrentie,
geen noodzaak om te verbeteren.
Is er al een elektrische Trabant?
GELACH Dat bedoel ik!
En dan heb je nog kapitalisme,
dat is goed.
Vrije markt, concurrentie...
goede bedrijven, die maken winst,
die kunnen groeien.
En bedrijven die een slecht product
leveren...
zoals Kees van der Staaij
Condooms...
Ken je die niet?
Veilig kezen!
Da's een dom idee.
Dus die maken verlies en die gaan
failliet, zo werkt kapitalisme.
En daarom hebben we dat hier.
En daarom is het hier ook zo
gezellig.
Maar, Suzanne, de laatste tijd
gebeuren er wel dingen...
die niet helemaal kloppen
met wat ik heb geleerd.
Moet je kijken, hier.
Uber boekt grootste verlies ooit.
Meer dan 5 miljard dollar verlies
in drie maanden.

English: 
Capitalism. Oh dear.
Well what I remember from economics classes is...
there are two important systems.
There's communism, that's stupid right?
That's where one supplier determines the price and the supply, everything.
There's no competition, no need to improve.
Is there already an electric Trabant?
See that's what I'm saying.
And then there's capitalism, and that is good.
Free market. Competition
Good businesses make a profit and can grow.
And businesses that deliver a bad product
like Kees van der Staaij condoms
What, don't you know them?
Kees safely!
Well that's a dumb idea.
So they make a loss and go bankrupt.
That's how capitalism works. That's why we have that here
And that's why it's so nice here.
Lately, things have been happening that don't quite match what I've learned.
Look at this: "Uber makes the biggest loss ever".
A loss of more than 5 billion dollars in three months

Portuguese: 
Pensei que estavam
rumo à falência,
e é ruim para mim
porque ando muito de Uber,
mas é assim que funciona
o capitalismo.
Então semana que vem
vou voltar a andar de Táxi Mariska.
"Então, a Uber faliu e estamos
de volta no carro com a Maris?"
Mas o Uber não faliu!
De fato, vai se expandir.
Olha só, um novo escritório
em Amsterdã.
Vão passar de 1500
para 3000 funcionários.
Como pode ter prejuízo
e expandir ao mesmo tempo?
Também sempre me pergunto isso
sobre as famílias que recebem ajuda financeira,
mas tudo bem.
Mas é possível porque a Uber é uma
empresa bem interessante.
Não no sentido de que com frequência
os motoristas da Uber dirigem até morrer
porque não descansam,
porque o aplicativo do motorista
é projetado como um tipo
de caça-níquel,
para que ele queira
continuar dirigindo,
e que os motoristas dificilmente
são avaliados ou treinados
e têm que trabalhar períodos muito longos,
porque senão não conseguem sobreviver.
E quando alguém é levado à morte,

English: 
so i thought "They're heading straight for a bankruptcy"
And that's too bad for me because I use Uber quite a lot
but that's just how capitalism works.
I'll just use Taxi Mariska again next week.
"So, Uber is bankrupt and you're back in the car with Maris?"
But! Uber isn't bankrupt.
In fact, they're expanding.
Look. A new office in Amsterdam
they're going from 1500 to 3000 employees.
How can you make a loss and expand at the same time?
That's what i'm always wondering about families that are in financial aid too, but ok
But, it's possible!
Because Uber is a very interesting company.
And then I'm not talking about the fact that Uber drivers kill quite a lot of people
because they never take time to relax
because the drivers' app is designed as a slot machine
so that you want to keep driving. And that the drivers are barely screened or trained.
And have to work very long days because otherwise they can't survive of it.

Dutch: 
Dus ik dacht, die zijn op weg
naar een faillissement.
En da's jammer voor mij, want ik ga
best wel vaak met een Uber.
Maar zo werkt kapitalisme.
Dan ga ik volgende keer wel weer
met taxi Mariska.
'Zo, Uber failliet en we zitten weer
bij Maris in de wagen?'
Maar Uber is niet failliet.
Sterker nog, ze gaan uitbreiden.
Hier kijk, een nieuw kantoor
in Amsterdam.
Ze gaan van 1500 naar 3000
medewerkers.
Hoe kun je nou verlies maken
en uitbreiden tegelijk?
Dat vraag ik me trouwens ook altijd
af bij bijstandsgezinnen,
maar oke.
Maar het kan omdat Uber een heel
interessant bedrijf is.
En dan bedoel ik even niet dat
Uber-chauffeurs best vaak mensen
doodrijden...
omdat ze geen rust pakken
doordat de chauffeurs-app is
ontworpen als 'n soort gokautomaat.
Zodat je steeds maar door wilt
rijden...
en dat de chauffeurs nauwelijks
worden gescreend of getraind...
en heel lange dagen moeten maken,
omdat ze er anders niet van
kunnen leven.
En als er dan weer iemand is
doodgereden...

Dutch: 
dat Uber daar dan geen enkele
verantwoordelijkheid voor neemt...
en vaak zelfs helemaal niks laten
horen aan de nabestaanden.
Maar daar gaat het nu even niet om.
Het gaat nu om die vraag:
Hoe kan Uber ruim 2 miljoen dollar
per uur verliezen...
en niet failliet gaan?
Misschien denk je: ze hebben even
een mindere periode, hebben we
allemaal wel eens.
Ik had vorig jaar een ton
in een startup van Kees van der
Staaij gestoken.
Geen cent van terug gezien.
Maar heeft Uber haupt ooit winst
gemaakt?
Nee, nog nooit!
Wat Uber doet klopt niet met wat ik
weet van het kapitalisme.
En heel veel andere grote bedrijven
waarvan je denkt: die gaan lekker...
die maken ook verlies!
Hier kijk, Spotify maakt verlies.
Deliveroo maakt verlies.
Airbnb maakt verlies.
Snapchat maakt verlies.
Of wat dacht je van Takeway, het
moederbedrijf van Thuisbezorgd?
Maakt verlies.
En de V&D maakt verlies...
maar ja, die zijn er dan ook mee
gestopt! Die dachten nog:
'Stapels net niet mooie handdoeken
in een veel te groot pand,

Portuguese: 
que a Uber não assume
qualquer responsabilidade
e muitas vezes
sequer avisa os familiares.
Mas esse não é o ponto.
O ponto é: como a Uber pode perder
mais de 2 milhões de dólares por hora sem falir?
Você pode pensar que estão
num momento ruim, acontece com todos.
Ano passado investi um montão
numa startup do Kees van der Staaij.
Nem um centavo voltou.
Nenhum.
Mas a Uber já lucrou
alguma vez?
Não, nunca!
O que o Uber faz não corresponde
ao que conheço do capitalismo.
E muitas outras grandes empresas
que você pensa que vão bem
também têm prejuízo!
Olha só: Spotify tem prejuízo,
Deliveroo tem prejuízo,
Airbnb tem prejuízo,
Snapchat tem prejuízo,
Takeway, a empresa controladora
da Thuisbezorgd, tem prejuízo.
E a V&D tem prejuízo.
Mas sim, essa de fato se foi!
Ainda pensavam:
"Pilhas de toalhas feias
num prédio grande demais,

English: 
AND IF SOMEONE HAS BEEN KILLED AGAIN AND UBER TAKES NO RESPONSIBILITY AT ALL
AND OFTEN DOESN'T TELL THE RELATIVES ANYTHING!
Because that's just not what it's about right now.
Now the question is, how can Uber
operate at a loss of 2 million dollars per hour
and not go bankrupt?
Maybe you think: "Well, they're just doing not so well right now. It happens to us all"
Last year I invested 100.000 euros
in a start up of Kees van der Staaij.
Never got a penny back, not a single one!
But, did Uber-ever make a profit?
No!
Not ever!
What Uber does, doesn't make sense to me,
based on my knowledge of capitalism.
And many other companies you think are doing well
are also not making profit.
Spotify operates at a loss
Deliveroo operates at a loss
Airbnb operates at a loss
Snapchat operates at a loss
Takeaway, the parent company of Thuisbezorgd,
operates at a loss
And Vroom & Dreesman operates at a loss
But they're actually gone!
They contemplated "Stashes or off-color towels

Portuguese: 
o que poderia dar errado?"
E agora estão falidos.
Mas essas empresas de tecnologia
ainda existem.
E isso é porque essas empresas
têm muito dinheiro.
E não enriqueceram oferecendo viagens de táxi
ou entregando comida,
elas recebem dinheiro
de investidores ricos.
E esse tipo de dinheiro, Suzane,
é chamado de capital de risco.
Ou em inglês,
venture capital.
Ou em havaiano,
'oihana kapili.
Ou em português,
capital de risco.
Muitas grandes empresas de tecnologia 
recebem investimento de capital de risco
e por isso podem ter prejuízo
por tanto tempo sem ir à falência.
Por exemplo, a Uber é financiada
pela SoftBank.
Soa super confortável, SoftBank ("banco macio"),
mas é uma grande empresa japonesa.
A SoftBank já ganhou bilhões
investindo na loja virtual chinesa Alibaba.
Com razão, porque é uma ótima loja.
Sim, certo? Nada de errado nisso.
Dica: cada carregador de telefone inflamável
agora inclui grátis
uma Barbie cancerígena. Ótimo!

Dutch: 
hoe kan dat nou niet werken?'
En nu zijn ze failliet.
Terwijl die techbedrijven,
die bestaan nog.
En dat komt doordat die bedrijven
HEEL VEEL geld hebben.
En dat hebben ze niet verdiend met
taxiritjes of maaltijden bezorgen...
dat geld krijgen ze
van rijke investeerders.
En dat soort geld, Suzanne,
heet durfkapitaal.
Of in het Engels: Venture capital.
Of in het Hawaiiaans:
'oihana kapili.
Of in het Nederlands: durfkapitaal.
Veel van die grote techbedrijven
krijgen dus geld
van durfkapitalisten...
en DAARDOOR kunnen ze
zo lang verlies lijden
zonder failliet te gaan.
Uber wordt bijvoorbeeld gesteund
door Softbank.
Dat klinkt supercomfortabel,
Softbank, maar het is een groot
Japans bedrijf.
Softbank heeft ooit miljarden
verdiend door te investeren...
in de Chinese webwinkel Alibaba.
Terecht, want het is een geweldige
winkel. Ja toch? Niks mis mee.
Tip: Je krijgt nu gratis
bij elke brandbare telefoonlader...
een kankerverwekkende Barbie. Top!

English: 
In an over-sized store, what could possibly go wrong?"
And now they went bankrupt!
But those tech-companies still exist.
The reason for this is that they have loads of money.
And they didn't earn that with driving a taxi, or delivering meals.
No, they get the money from wealthy investors.
And that kind of money, Suzanne, is called "durfkapitaal".
Or in English "venture capital".
Or in Hawaiian "oihana kapili".
Or in Dutch "durfkapitaal".
A lot of those big tech companies get money from venture capitalists
And that's why they can operate at a loss for so long without going bankrupt.
Uber, for example, is getting supported by SoftBank
And that sounds super comfortable, SoftBank,
but it's a big Japanese company.
And SoftBank once earned billions by investing in the Chinese webshop Alibaba.
And justly so, because it's an amazing shop.
Right? Yeah!
Awesome, nothing wrong with it, no.
Tip: with every flammable phone charger you now get a free carcinogenic barbie.
Great!

Portuguese: 
E agora a SoftBank está investindo
bilhões em capital de risco.
E não apenas o seu próprio dinheiro,
mas também o de alguns amigos.
O fundo de U$ 100 bilhões
é apoiado principalmente pela SoftBank
mas também inclui investimentos maciços 
da Apple, Qualcomm, Sharp
e de fundos de riqueza soberana
da Arábia Saudita e dos Emirados Árabes.
Sim, boa lista.
Apple, Sharp, Arábia Saudita.
Esse é o país, por sinal, que assassinou
e cortou em pedaços o jornalista Jamal Khashoggi.
Então, quando estou num Uber, em parte
sou patrocinado pela Arábia Saudita.
Daí o seu slogan:
"Uber, possibilitado por um pedacinho
de um jornalista de qualidade."
Novo slogan.
E capital de risco
não é um investimento típico.
Não é como a Mariska da Táxi Mariska
que emprestou dinheiro de um tio rico
para comprar seu primeiro táxi usado.
Estas são empresas existentes
nas quais milhões estão sendo jogados
por milionários e bilionários
tentando enriquecer ainda mais.
E então as empresas locais
têm que competir com isso.

English: 
And now SoftBank is investing billions of venture capital.
And not just their own money, but also that of a couple of friends.
Yeah, nice list. Apple, Sharp, Saudi Arabia.
That, by the way, is the country that had journalist Jamal Khashoggi murdered and sawed in little pieces.
So when I'm sitting in an Uber I'm also getting sponsored a little by Saudi Arabia.
Hence their slogan: "Uber, made possible by a piece of quality journalist."
It's the new slogan.
And venture capitals aren't regular investments.
It's not like Mariska from Taxi Mariska, who once borrowed money from her rich uncle to buy her first second-hand taxi.
No, these are already existing companies where millions are getting thrown at
by millionaires, and billionaires who are trying to still get even more rich.
And that's what local companies have to compete with.

Dutch: 
En nu investeert Softbank
miljarden aan durfkapitaal.
En niet alleen zijn eigen geld,
maar ook dat van een paar vriendjes.
Ja, mooi rijtje.
Apple, Sharpe, Saoedi-Arabie...
Dat is trouwens het land
dat journalist Jamal Khashoggi
liet vermoorden en in stukjes zagen.
Dus als ik in een Uber zit,
word ik ook een beetje gesponsord
door Saoedi-Arabië.
Vandaar ook hun slogan.
'Uber, mede mogelijk gemaakt door
een stukje kwaliteitsjournalist.'
Nieuwe slogan.
En durfkapitaal, dat zijn
geen gewone investeringen, he.
Dus niet zoals Mariska
van Taxi Mariska...
die ooit wat geld van een rijke oom
heeft geleend om haar eerste
tweedehands taxi te kopen.
Dit zijn al bestaande bedrijven
waar miljoenen tegenaan
worden geflatst...
door miljardairs die proberen
om nog ietsje rijker te worden.
En daar moeten lokale bedrijfjes
dus mee concurreren.

Dutch: 
Taxi Mariska neemt het op tegen
Softbank, Apple en Saoedi Arabie.
Dan maakt het dus niet meer uit
hoe goed ze rijdt of hoe lekker
haar taxi ruikt.
Want die gasten
hebben oneindig veel geld...
dus die kunnen de ritjes
zo goedkoop maken...
dat alle normale taxi's
failliet gaan.
Wat kost zo'n ritje van de Kuip
naar het Malieveld voor jou?
Rond de 60, 70 euro,
op de normale wettelijke meter.
En wat betaal je voor een Uber?
Ongeveer 25 euro.
Dat is nogal een verschil.
Zij hebben de markt gewoon verziekt.
Maar waarom stoppen
die rijke mensen zo veel geld
in verliesgevende taxi's?
Het lijkt mij niet dat Saoedi Arabië
een passie heeft voor betaalbaar
personenvervoer in de Randstad.
'Journalisten moeten dood,
homo's moeten dood...
als je steelt gaan je handen eraf...
en van Leiden Centraal
naar Snowworld Zoetermeer
moet onder de dertig euro kunnen.'
Ik bedoel,
is er ook maar EEN econoom...
die durft te beweren dat geld
verliezen onderdeel is van het plan?
Nou, op zich is dit wel
onderdeel van het plan.

English: 
So Taxi Mariska is competing against SoftBank, Apple and Saudi Arabia!
So it doesn't even matter anymore how good of a driver she is, or how nice her taxi smells.
Because those guys have an unlimited amount of money,
so they can make the rides dirt cheap to make all the regular taxis go bankrupt.
"So, how much is it for a ride from De Kuip to the Malieveld for you?"
"Around 60 to 70 euros, going by the normal lawful meter."
"And how much is it for an Uber?"
"Around 25 euros."
"Quite a big difference."
"They completely messed up the market."
But why do those rich people put so much money in taxis that are operating at a loss?
I doubt that Saudi Arabia has a passion for affordable passenger transport in the Randstad.
"Journalists must die! Gays must die! If you steal we'll cut off your hands,
and going from Leiden Central to SnowWorld Zoetermeer has to be possible under €30!"
I mean can you find a single economist who dares to claim that losing money is part of the plan?
"In essence it is part of the plan.

Portuguese: 
Táxi Mariska compete com
SoftBank, Apple e Arábia Saudita.
Então não importa mais quão bem ela dirige 
ou quão bem o táxi dela cheira.
Porque esses caras têm uma quantia
infinita de dinheiro
para tornar as viagens tão baratas
que todos os táxis normais vão à falência.
Quanto custa para você uma viagem
do estádio De Kuip para o parque Malieveld?
Cerca de 60 €, 70 €,
no medidor legal normal.
- E o que você paga por um Uber?
- Cerca de 25 €.
- Isso é muita diferença.
- Eles arruinaram o mercado.
Mas por que esses ricos investem tanto
em táxis deficitários?
Não me parece que a Arábia Saudita
tem uma paixão por preços acessíveis
no transporte de passageiros
na zona metropolitana de Randstad.
"Jornalistas devem morrer,
gays têm que morrer,
se você roubar
vamos cortar suas mãos,
e a corrida da estação central de Leiden
para a SnowWorld em Zoetermeer
tem que custar
menos de 30 €."
Quero dizer, ALGUM economista
se atreve a afirmar que perder dinheiro
é parte do plano?
Bem, isso na verdade
é parte do plano.

Dutch: 
Het zijn hele hoge aanloopverliezen.
En het idee is dat je
het toch jarenlang volhoudt...
om marktleider te worden.
Net als Amazon dat heeft gedaan.
'Amazon?'
Help even? Ik weet opeens niet meer
wat Amazon is.
https://protect-de.mimecast.com/s/XezMCgpRD2CKOOjcEnc0r?domain=bol.com
weet ik ook niet meer,
ik ben alle grote jongens kwijt.
Kunnen we even stoppen?
Nee, 't is live? Oke, jammer.
Volgens economisch
expert Robin Fransman...
is het dus onderdeel van het plan
om verlies te draaien.
Ze worden heel snel heel groot.
Dat kost heel veel geld,
maar dan ben je er eenmaal...
en dan ben je
een soort monopolist...
en dan kan het geld
harken beginnen.
Denk aan Guugle... eh, Google.
Ja, dat is een Fransman,
die zegt Guugle.
Het plan is dus: De grootste worden
en dan winst maken.
Zoals bijvoorbeeld Amazon.
Dat maakte jarenlang verlies om maar
te kunnen groeien, groeien, groeien.
En dat is gelukt,
want de omzet van Amazon
is inmiddels 280 miljard dollar.

English: 
These are very high initial losses,
and the idea is that you keep that up for years to become market leader.
Kind of like how Amazon did."
- "Amazon?"
Amazon?
"Help me."
"I suddenly don't know what Amazon is."
"I also forgot what Bol.com is, I lost all the big guys."
"Can we stop for a bit?"
"No? It's live? Bummer."
Alright, so according to economic expert Robin Fransman it's part of the plan to operate at a loss.
"They get really big really quickly, that costs a lot of money. But in the end you get there and you'll be kind of a monopolist,
and then the money raking can begin.
Think of Guugle, or Google. Guugle? Google!"
Yea, he's a Frenchman, he says Guugle. Obviously.
But, the plan is becoming the biggest and then making profit.
Like Amazon for example.
They operated at a loss for years just to be able to grow, grow, grow.
And they succeeded because Amazon's revenue is currently 280 billion dollars.

Portuguese: 
São perdas iniciais
muito altas,
e a ideia é continuar assim
por muitos anos
para se tornar um líder de mercado.
Parecido com o que fez a Amazon.
Amazon?
"Me ajuda? De repente esqueci
o que é a Amazon.
Também não lembro mais da bol.com. 
Esqueci todos os grandões.
Podemos parar um pouquinho?
Não, é ao vivo? Droga."
De acordo com o especialista
Robin Fransman,
faz parte do plano
operar com prejuízo.
Elas crescem muito rápido.
Isso custa muito dinheiro,
mas então no fim
você vira um tipo
de monopolista
e então começa
a juntar dinheiro.
Pense na Gügle... ãhn,
Google, Gügle, Google?
Sim, ele é francês,
fala Gügle.
Portanto, o plano é tornar-se o maior
e depois lucrar, como a Amazon.
Ela teve prejuízo por anos
para poder crescer, crescer, crescer.
E conseguiram porque as vendas dela
são de US$ 280 bilhões hoje.

Portuguese: 
Mais do que a receita da empresa conjunta
formada por bol.com, Coolblue e Wehkamp.
Ah, sim, e a Chéquia.
A Amazon também está lucrando agora.
Em 2018 foram mais de US$ 10 bilhões.
e graças a vários esquemas inteligentes,
zero euros de impostos a pagar.
É outra coisa que não espero
da Táxi Mariska.
"Sim, meu contador sempre me recomenda
fazer tudo pelas Ilhas Caimã,
mas você manobra
o seu próprio acidente."
E o dono da Amazon,
Jeff Bezos,
há uns anos é o homem
mais rico do mundo.
US$ 130 bilhões.
Isso é tanto dinheiro que poderia contratar
o John de Mol como ajudante doméstico.
E ele só faz isso.
Todo mundo quer isso, portanto,
agora se vê por todo lugar
essa disputa
para se tornar o maior.
Por exemplo,
na entrega de comida.
Olha só, parece
que uma criança
brincou de mapa-múndi
com giz de cera,
mas o que isso mostra é a guerra
dos entregadores de comida,

Dutch: 
Dat is meer dan de gezamenlijke
omzet van https://protect-de.mimecast.com/s/XezMCgpRD2CKOOjcEnc0r?domain=bol.com,
Coolblue en Wehkamp.
O, ja... en Tsjechie.
Inmiddels maakt Amazon ook winst.
In 2018 meer dan dan
tien miljard dollar.
In 2018 meer dan
tien miljard dollar.
Waar ze trouwens dankzij
allemaal slimme constructies...
nul euro belasting
over betaalden.
Nog zoiets wat ik Taxi Mariska
op de een of andere manier
niet voor elkaar zie boksen.
'Ja, m'n accountant zegt altijd...
je moet alles
via de Kaaiman-eilanden doen...
maar je rijdt je eigen een ongeluk.'
En de eigenaar van Amazon,
Jeff Bezos...
is sinds een paar jaar
de rijkste man ter wereld.
130 miljard, heeft- ie.
130 miljard, heeft-ie.
Dat is zoveel geld, dan kun je John
de Mol in huis nemen als au pair.
En dat doet-ie gewoon.
Dat wil iedereen wel
en daarom zie je nu overal
die strijd om de grootste te worden.
Bijvoorbeeld
in de maaltijdbezorging.
Kijk hier,
dit lijkt alsof een peuter...
met stoepkrijt op de wereldkaart
heeft gekliederd...
maar wat je hier ziet,
is de maaltijdbezorgoorlog...

English: 
That's more than the joint revenue of Bol.com, Coolblue and Wehkamp
and, oh right, the Czech Republic.
Currently Amazon is making profit.
In 2018 that was more than 10 billion dollars.
Of which they didn't have to pay any taxes due to a bunch of smart constructions.
Another thing I somehow don't see Taxi Mariska ever accomplishing...
"Yea, my accountant always says you have to do everything through the Cayman Islands,
but yea, you're driving yourself crazy!"
And the owner of Amazon, Jeff Bezos, is the richest man on earth since a couple years.
He's got 130 billion dollars.
That's so much money, you could hire John de Mol as au pair.
And he'll just do it.
So, everyone would want that, that's why you're seeing these battles everywhere of companies trying to become the biggest.
With meal delivery services for example.
Look, this looks like a toddler messed around on the world map with a crayon,
but what you're seeing here is the meal delivery services war.

Portuguese: 
elaborado pelo repórter de guerra de
entrega de comida da NRC Handelsblad.
E cada cor é um adolescente
diferente numa bicicleta
com uma caixa grande
de curry morno nas costas.
Just Eat-TakeAway, em laranja,
tem Europa Ocidental e parte do Canadá.
O Uber Eats, em verde, tem França,
México e um pedaço da América,
e também existem a DoorDash,
a Grubhub e a Meituan.
Meituan está sozinha na China,
então se você pedir algo lá,
tem que ter cuidado...
Droga, essa moção!
(tuíte: exceto o FVD, todos os partidos aprovaram a moção que permite à Segunda Câmara declarar inaceitável qualquer expressão discriminatória a pessoas de origem chinesa)
Quase deu errado.
E essa luta também é alimentada
com dinheiro, Suzane.
Portanto, não é "nosso adolescente de bicicleta
é o mais rápido"
mas "bam, desconto na sua refeição,
sem custos de entrega,
pacote grátis do
Kees van der Staaijs,
não nos importamos,
já estamos perdendo milhões,
só queremos virar o maior
e lucrar depois."
Na Holanda, a propósito
alguém já conseguiu: a Thuisbezorgd.
No começo pediram pros restaurantes
uma comissão de 6% por pedido,

Dutch: 
getekend door de
maaltijdsbezorgoorlogsverslaggever
van NRC Handelsblad.
En elke kleur is een andere puber
op een fiets met zo'n grote doos
lauwe curry op zijn rug.
Just Eat-TakeAway, dat is oranje,
heeft West Europa en een groot deel
van Canada in handen.
Uber Eats is hier groen,
heeft Frankrijk, Mexico
en een stuk Amerika...
en dan zijn er nog Doordash,
Grubhub en 'Meituan'.
Meituan zit alleen in China...
dus als je daar iets
bestelt moet je oppassen...
O, kut die motie!
Bijna mis gegaan.
En ook deze strijd
wordt gevoerd met geld, Suzanne.
Dus niet van: 'Onze elektrische
fiets-puber is het snelst'...
maar, hier, bam,
korting op je maaltijd...
geen bezorgkosten, gratis pakje
Kees van der Staaijs erbij...
maakt ons het uit,
we maken toch al miljoenen verlies..
we willen alleen maar de grootste
worden en dan cashen.
Binnen Nederland is dat trouwens
al iemand gelukt,
namelijk Thuisbezorgd.
Die vroegen oorspronkelijk
een commissie van 6% per bestelling
aan restaurants...

English: 
Drawn by the meal delivery services war reporter of NRC Handelsblad.
And every color is a different teenager on his bike with one of those big boxes of lukewarm curry on his back.
Just Eat Takeaway, look it's here in orange, has Western Europe and a large part of Canada.
And Uber Eats, that's here in green, has France, Mexico, and a piece of America.
And then there's also DoorDash, Grubhub and Meituan.
And Meituan is only in China, so if you order something there you have to be carefu-
Oh shit, that motion.
(Tweet: All parties except Forum for Democracy voted for a motion that lets the House of Representatives declare that all discriminating statements to people of Chinese origin are unacceptable)
I almost screwed up.
And this battle too, is fought with money, Suzanne.
So not like "our electric bike cycling teen is the fastest",
but like "Bam! Here, a discount on your meal!".
No delivery fee.
A free pack of Kees van der Staaijs with it
We don't care! We're losing millions already anyway!
We only want to become the biggest, and then cash in."
Within the Netherlands somebody already succeeded in doing that: Thuisbezorgd.
In the beginning they asked restaurants a commission of 6% per order.

Portuguese: 
e agora que são os maiores,
eles pedem 13%.
Há 9 anos, esta loja de shawarma em Tilburg
trabalha com a Thuisbezorgd.
Tudo parecia
tão conveniente.
Clientes faziam pedidos pelo aplicativo
ou no site da Thuisbezorgd.
E como o entregador e o transporte
também são custo,
resta cada vez menos lucro.
Especialmente agora que a Thuisbezorgd
quer cada vez mais.
É incontrolável.
Prevejo que dentro de 4 ou 5 anos
estaremos perto de 20%.
Sim, ficará em casa, "entregue."
A Thuisbezorgd ("entrega em casa"), hoje parte
do Just Eat-TakeAway ("comida pra levar Só Comer")
e Calar a Droga da Boca,
é tão grande que restaurantes
não podem mais ignorá-la
e jogam os preços
para cima.
Essa é a próxima fase.
Primeiro tem a fase de crescimento,
onde o Uber está agora,
que é caro para a empresa,
mas legal para o consumidor,
e então vem a fase
de arrecadação de dinheiro,
quando os preços sobem.
E isso é bom para a empresa
mas ruim para o consumidor.
E Suzane, provavelmente
você pensa agora:
"Mas o capitalismo
não é assim mesmo?"

English: 
And now that they're the biggest, they're asking for 13%.
"For nine years this shawarma store in Tilburg has been working with Thuisbezorgd.nl.
It all seemed so convenient.
Customers order via the app or site of Thuisbezorgd.nl.
And because the deliverer and the transport all cost money as well, there's less and less profit left.
Especially since Thuisbezorgd keeps wanting more.
"It's unstoppable.
So I expect that within 4-5 years we'll be nearing 20%."
Yea, he'll be at home, worried. (pun)
Thuisbezorgd, currently part of Just Eat Takeaway And Shut The Fuck up,
is so big that restaurants can't avoid them anymore and so they're raising their prices.
And that's the next phase.
So first you have the growing phase, which Uber is currently in,
it's expensive for the company, but nice for the consumer.
And then comes the money raking phase, when prices go up.
And that's nice for the company, but bad for the consumer.
And Suzanne, you're probably thinking "But isn't that just capitalism?"

Dutch: 
en nu ze de grootste zijn,
vragen ze 13%.
Al negen jaar werkt
deze shoarmazaak in Tilburg...
samen met https://protect-de.mimecast.com/s/n1OuCjYXg8tDKKwhnBo1_?domain=thuisbezorgd.nl.
Het leek allemaal zo handig.
Klanten bestellen via de app of site
van https://protect-de.mimecast.com/s/n1OuCjYXg8tDKKwhnBo1_?domain=thuisbezorgd.nl.
En doordat de bezorger
en het vervoer...
natuurlijk ook allemaal geld kost,
blijft er steeds minder winst over.
Zeker nu Thuisbezorgd
steeds meer wil hebben.
Het is niet meer te stoppen.
Ik ga ervanuit dat binnen
een jaar of vier, vijf...
dat we zeker
tegen de 20 procent aanzitten.
Die
zit straks bezorgd thuis.
Thuisbezorgd, inmiddels
onderdeel van Just Eat-TakeAway
& Shut the Fuck Up...
is zo groot dat restaurants
niet meer om ze heen kunnen
en gooit de prijzen omhoog.
Dat is de volgende fase.
Je hebt eerst de groeifase,
waar Uber nu in zit...
dat is duur voor het bedrijf,
maar fijn voor de consument...
en dan komt de geld-hark-fase.
Dan gaan de prijzen omhoog.
En dat is fijn voor het bedrijf
maar slecht voor de consument.
En Suzanne,
jij denkt nu waarschijnlijk:
'Ja, maar dat is toch
gewoon kapitalisme?'
'Als Uber te duur wordt,
bestel ik wel weer

English: 
"If Uber gets too expensive I'll just order a taxi with Taxi Mariska".
No! Because Taxi Mariska will be bankrupt by that time.
There will only be Uber.
That's the whole point!
And then you'll say "Well then I'll start my own taxi company".
Well that's nice Suzanne,  but that's impossible because you have to make a living doing it! You get that right?!
Meanwhile Uber can burn a couple millions to out-cheap you off the market!
Ugh Suzanne, so naive.
And that's what you'll also be seeing with Amazon.
They're coming to the Netherlands this year.
They're gonna go below the regular prices until Coolblue is dead, and Bol.com is dead.
They're probably gonna continue until the entire colour blue doesn't exist anymore.
And of course, it's all free market, but you're playing monopoly against someone with unlimited monopoly money.
If you buy the East station, Amazon will buy all the other stations, your chair and your table
and puts 12 hotels on your microwave so you'll have to pay for your own food.
True story.
And in the meantime they don't pay a cent in taxes because by that time they'll be bigger than France!

Dutch: 
een taxi bij Taxi Mariska.'
Nee, want Taxi Mariska
is tegen die tijd failliet, Suzanne,
er is alleen nog maar Uber.
Dat is het hele punt.
En dan zeg je:
Ik begin zelf wel een
taxi-bedrijfje.
Maar dat kan niet
want jij moet ervan leven, Suzanne,
dat snap je toch wel?
Terwijl Uber een paar miljoen
kan burnen...
om jou uit de markt te prijzen.
Oh, Suzanne, zo naief.
En dat zul je ook zien met Amazon.
Die komen dit jaar naar Nederland.
Die gaan net zo lang
onder de prijs zitten...
totdat Coolblue dood is
en https://protect-de.mimecast.com/s/XezMCgpRD2CKOOjcEnc0r?domain=bol.com
dood is.
Waarschijnlijk gaan ze door tot de
hele kleur blauw niet meer bestaat.
En tuurlijk,
het is allemaal vrije markt...
maar je speelt dus Monopoly tegen
iemand met onbeperkt Monopolygeld.
Als jij Station Oost koopt,
koopt Amazon alle andere stations...
je stoel, je tafel en zet die
twaalf hotels op je magnetron...
zodat je moet gaan betalen
voor je eigen eten.
True story.
En ondertussen betalen ze geen cent
belasting omdat ze tegen die tijd
groter zijn dan Frankrijk.
Bedrijven als Amazon,
maar ook Apple en Google...

Portuguese: 
"Se o Uber ficar muito caro,
vou voltar a usar o Táxi Mariska."
Não, porque a Táxi Mariska
então estará falida,
restará apenas o Uber.
Esse é o ponto.
E então você diz:
"Vou abrir minha própria empresa de táxi."
Mas isso é impossível
porque você tem que viver disso, entende?
Enquanto a Uber
pode queimar alguns milhões
para tirar você do mercado.
Oh, Suzane, tão ingênua.
E veremos isso na Amazon.
Estão vindo para a Holanda este ano.
Vão segurar os preços baixos
por um tempo
até a Coolblue e a bol.com
estarem mortas.
Provavelmente continuarão
até a cor azul deixar de existir.
E claro, é tudo
livre mercado,
mas você está jogando Monopoly (Banco Imobiliário)
contra um monopólio com dinheiro ilimitado.
Se você comprar a Estação Leste,
a Amazon compra todas as outras estações
sua cadeira, sua mesa e põe
12 hotéis no seu microondas
pra fazer você pagar
por sua própria comida.
História verdadeira.
Enquanto isso, não pagam um centavo
de imposto porque serão maiores que a França.
Empresas como a Amazon,
mas também Apple e Google,

Dutch: 
die hebben het kapitalisme
uitgespeeld.
En dat is nog nooit voorgekomen.
Althans, het is EEN keer eerder
iemand gelukt.
Dit is meneer
John D. Rockefeller.
En die had een leuke startup
in de 19e eeuw...
je kon hem dan een beetje geld geven
en dan kreeg je olie.
Geniaal achteraf, want in 1911
had-ie 90% van de oliehandel
in Amerika in handen.
Omgerekend was-ie rijker
dan Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates
en Jeroen Pauw samen...
en toen heeft de Amerikaanse rechter
besloten dat-ie in stukjes
moest worden gehakt.
Zijn bedrijf, he, niet hijzelf.
Hij is geen Saoedi Arabier.
En waarom werd zijn bedrijf
in stukjes gehakt?
Nou, te veel geld en te veel macht
bij EEN bedrijf
is slecht voor iedereen.
Dan verlies je concurrentie
en keuzevrijheid...
en dat zijn nou precies de goede
dingen van het kapitalisme...
die onze wereld
zo mooi hebben gemaakt.
Dus wat je dan overhoudt
is eigenlijk geen kapitalisme meer.
Lege winkelstraten,
geen concurrentie...
en een paar mensen die al het geld
en dus de touwtjes in handen hebben.

Portuguese: 
venceram o jogo
do capitalismo.
E isso nunca aconteceu.
Ou melhor, tá, aconteceu
ao menos UMA vez.
Este é senhor
John D. Rockefeller.
Ele teve uma boa startup
no século XIX.
Você dava a ele um dinheirinho
e ele conseguia um petrolinho.
Engenhoso em retrospecto, pois em 1911
ele tinha 90% do mercado de petróleo nos EUA.
Convertendo, era mais rico que Jeff Bezos,
Bill Gates e Jeroen Pauw juntos.
E então um juiz dos EUA
decidiu picar em pedacinhos...
... sua empresa, não ele, ei.
Ele não é um árabe saudita.
E por que picar sua empresa
em pedacinhos?
Bem, muito dinheiro e muito poder
em UMA empresa faz mal a todos.
Perde-se concorrência
e liberdade de escolha,
que são exatamente
as coisas boas do capitalismo
que tornaram nosso mundo
tão bonito.
Então, o que se tem na verdade
não é mais capitalismo.
Ruas comerciais vazias,
sem concorrência,
e poucas pessoas que têm todo o dinheiro
e, portanto, estão no controle.

English: 
So companies like Amazon, but also Apple and Google have completed the game of capitalism.
And that has never happened before.
Although, alright someone managed to do it once before.
This is mr. John D. Rockefeller.
He had a very nice start-up in the 19th century.
You could give him a little bit of money, and then you'd get oil.
Which was genius in hindsight, because in 1911 he owned 90% of oil trade in America.
And if you convert it he was richer than Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates and Jeroen Pauw together!
And then the American judge decided he had to be cut into pieces.
... His company, not him.
He's not Saudi Arabian.
But why did his company get cut into pieces?
Well, too much money and too much power within one company is bad for everyone.
You'll lose competition and freedom of choice.
And those are exactly the good things of capitalism that have made our world so beautiful.
So what you're left with then, actually isn't even capitalism anymore.
Empty shopping streets, no competition,
and a few people who have all the money, and thus are in control.

Portuguese: 
O que você tem então
na verdade é comunismo.
Um mundo onde poucas empresas
determinam tudo.
Onde nenhuma ideiazinha nova
tem chance de crescer.
Salsicha muito cara, só UM tipo
curry morno, e sem Táxi Maris.
É nessa direção
que o capitalismo tem ido!
Isso responde
a sua pergunta, Suzane?
Ok, ótimo.
Pra isso que estou aqui.
Tem mais alguma pergunta?
- Outra pergunta lá.
- Qual é a sua cor favorita?
Cor favorita? Ufa.
Acho que hoje
não temos mais tempo.
Esse foi o Domingo com Lubach,
muito obrigado por assistir
aproveite sua semana
e até o próximo domingo!

Dutch: 
Wat je dan overhoudt
is eigenlijk communisme.
EEN wereld met een paar grote
bedrijven die alles bepalen.
Waar geen enkel nieuw,
klein idee kans maakt om te groeien.
Peperdure eenheidsworst, EEN soort
lauwe curry en geen Taxi Maris.
Daar gaat het kapitalisme heen!
Is dit een beetje antwoord
op je vraag, Suzanne?
APPLAUS
Oke, top.
Daar ben ik voor.
Zijn er nog meer vragen?
Daar nog een vraag.
Wat is je lievelingskleur?
Lievelingskleur? Oef.
Dat gaan we
niet meer redden vandaag.

English: 
What you're left with then, is actually communism.
One world.
With a few big companies who decide everything!
Where not a single new small idea gets a chance to grow!
Ridiculously expensive uniformity!
One type of lukewarm curry!
And no Taxi Maris!
And that, that is where capitalism is headed.
That is where capitalism is headed.
Is that an answer to your question, Suzanne?
Yeah?
Alright, great.
That's what I'm here for.
Are there any other questions?
Yes? A question over there.
"What's your favourite color?"
My favourite color?
Oof, uh I don't think we have any time left for that today.
This was Zondag met Lubach! Thanks for watching, enjoy your week, and until next Sunday!

English: 
Yeah...um. These are the types of messages you wish you'll never have to read out loud.
But I have to. Um.. Everyone that's watching right now can subscribe to our channel...
I wish it wasn't so...But you'll have to click here.

Dutch: 
Dit was Zondag met Lubach,
heel veel bedankt voor het kijken...
veel plezier met je week
en tot volgende zondag!

Portuguese: 
Sim, hm.
Esse tipo de mensagens
ninguém quer ler em voz alta.
Mas eu preciso.
Quem está nos assistindo
pode se inscrever no canal.
Queria que fosse diferente,
mas você vai ter que clicar ali.
