Which pundits relying on polls predicted the election results accurately? Which pundits were idiotic and why it’s important to know who they are?

The winner is _New York Times_ pundit, Nate Silver. He predicted the presidential race outcomes in every state plus the District of Columbia — a perfect 51/51 score. Who were the idiots that blew it and what do they have in common?

Karl Rove had Romney winning Ohio, Iowa, Virginia, Colorado, and Florida and the Electoral College, 285, Obama 253. George Will, _The Washington Post_: Romney 321, Obama 217. Jay Cost, _Weekly Standard_: Romney victory. Michael Barone, The Examiner: Romney 315, Obama 223. Dick Morris, Fox News: Romney 325, Obama 213. Bill Bennett had Romney with 305 electoral votes. They are all Republicans who show up on Fox News. Living in their illusory bubble, they made up evidence for a GOP win instead of relying on the best science. Remember this when evaluating all statements by Fox News commentators. It’s not a big problem for the country when the Fox News Republicans reject arithmetic and science regarding the election results. It’s huge danger to our political dialogue when it comes to issues like Global Warming and other policy debates. When Fox News, the voice of the GOP, rejects arithmetic and science to lure people into cock-and-bull stories about extreme weather that impacts on our children's lives and the future of humanity, it’s a problem. Global Warming is a factory of Frankenstorms, hunger, nations under water, people threatened by dwindling resources. Fox News says Global Warming is a fabrication by Al Gore and 99% of the scientists who study it. Of course, Fox News also told us to trust them that Mitt Romney would win big. For those who watch Fox, remember that old saying: foor me once shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.