Thank you for visiting our forum. As a guest, you have limited access to view some discussion and articles. By joining our free community, you will be able to view all discussions and articles, post your own topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos, participate in Pick'Em contests and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today!!

Mon: Ugly. Just all over the place with his throws and makes receivers work too hard to catch the ball.

Tues: Much improved as many of his throws were on or close to the mark. Still had a few wayward passes and made receivers work too hard. Last day pick IMO.

Wed: Had a few nice throws but for the most part not good. Threw deep outs to uncovered receivers yet constantly had pass catchers leaving their feet, adjusting backwards or diving to catch his errant passes. Sidewinder which makes the situation even worse.

I'm sure they are asking Boyd to play from under center and do dropbacks, which highlights a QBs fundamentals. Boyd played in a shotgun system that hides QB fundamentals. It is t shocking that he is struggling so much.

Really sad how much money Dildo cost this kid. Once a late first early 2nd to possibly not getting drafted. I have met this kid a few times and I really like him as a person. Hate to see things work out this way for him. Maybe he can regroup and play better in the actual game. This is where you can see Clemson's lack of QB development.

Really sad how much money Dildo cost this kid. Once a late first early 2nd to possibly not getting drafted. I have met this kid a few times and I really like him as a person. Hate to see things work out this way for him. Maybe he can regroup and play better in the actual game. This is where you can see Clemson's lack of QB development.

It was bound to happen sooner or later with the way dabo does things. He won't be the last either

It is interesting that I have had several dedicated SC fans say if TB would have played at SC (and survived Spur 101) he would be a better QB. I have to agree and say he would be a more consistent QB. I think he has been good for CU and is a nice young man, but he made some bad decisions in the OB you don't expect from a 5th year senior.

__________________
If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?

Not intended as smack at all, but I think he's been one of the more overrated QBs in the last 5 years or so. None of this is surprising.

higher # of passes thrown in games=inflated stats, which is all that some people pay attention to.

add to it that offenses have evolved faster than defenses and you have some QBs who have really great stats but who are putting up those stats throwing to receivers who are wide open (I never watch a ton of Clemson but I don't ever really remember seeing Boyd completing a ton a tough throws into tight windows, a lot of the ones I remember seeing him complete are to receivers that don't have defenders within 5 yards of them).