INTRODUCTION {#sec1-1}
============

Human is a social being that will be forced to live in a group to meet his needs. However, the satisfaction of his needs is associated with a variety of obstacles.\[[@ref1]\] This problem becomes more acute when a person who lives in his native culture has been compiled to other cultures and inevitably forced into assimilation and acceptance of values, beliefs, norms, and customs of a new culture. More difficult is when he is forced to interact with a group of diverse cultures. In this case, depending on the circumstances, he is forced to change. His values and norms are unstable and distinction between insiders and outsiders in a foreign observer\'s view about him is very difficult.\[[@ref2]\] Furthermore, the transition from family life to student life and settle in a new home or dormitory, means away from the family emotional environment, is usually sad and sometimes this environment\'s change is coupled with a change of language and dialect and this can increase the odds of living in exile and caused physical and psychological pressures.\[[@ref1]\] Yet what comes to his aid is cultural intelligence and the quality of his adaptation to the new environment.

Intelligence and culture are used together because of their significant relationship with each other.\[[@ref3]\] Intelligence by Nobel is the capable of thinking, planning, creating, learning, problem solving ability, reaction, decision-making or the ability to adapt to new situations.\[[@ref4]\] Culture is also total full features of the spiritual, material, intellectual, and emotional features and it is not only composed of life-styles, but also including, human rights, value systems, traditions and beliefs.\[[@ref5]\] Accordingly, we can say that there is no uncultured humanely and according to the appropriateness and necessity of human\'s biodiversity and nature, there is a diversity among the nations.\[[@ref6]\] Some individuals and groups are more capable of achieving various purposes in such a multicultural environment, however, the intercultural interactive space for some individuals and social groups is associated with an increasing strife and conflict and negative competitions instead of collaboration and constructive cooperation. Hence, despite the cultural diversity, the ability to adapt continuously with people from different cultures and the ability to cross-cultural communicate is a skill that seems to be needed.\[[@ref7]\] Earley and Ang introduced cultural intelligence as an ability of an individual in order to successfully adapt to new cultural environments.\[[@ref8]\] Brislin *et al*., believed that cultural intelligence are attributes or skills that individuals possess it, in minimum time and with the least stress on cultural interaction are consistent with the outsider culture.\[[@ref3]\] As a result, training and development of cultural intelligence are necessary. Peterson based on the results of his research said that cultural intelligence is not innate, but has the ability to teach.\[[@ref9]\] Hence, cultural intelligence is an expanding category that education, training and experience can be added to its quantity and quality.\[[@ref10]\] By Earley and Ang vision, cultural intelligence is composed of metacognition dimension, means cultural awareness of cross-cultural interactions, cognitive dimension, means the knowledge about the norms, practices, and conventions of different cultures, motivation dimension, means the ability to learn in the cross-cultural environment, and behavior dimension, means the ability to use verbal and nonverbal actions when interacting with people from other cultures.\[[@ref11]\] Some researchers like Munn are called adaptation to adjust or adapt to their environment\[[@ref12]\] and others like Sadok and Sadok refers it to all strategies to manage stressful life situations, including threats, real or unreal applies.\[[@ref13]\] Some people know it as a varied and complex structure that is a social product\[[@ref14]\] that factors such as family, school environment, peers, social relations, social skills, and anti-social relations have been used for its measurement.\[[@ref15]\] By Rayan and Shim (2005) view, social adjustment after learning of social behaviors in accordance with social and personal needs can be achieved through social processes and by social interactions.\[[@ref16]\] Including social compatibility is compatible with the campus. Social, personal, and educational adjustments with the university environment means educational success, social satisfaction, and peace of mind.\[[@ref17]\] Furthermore the social adaptation has been known as a relative and intercultural concept that is influenced by many factors.\[[@ref18]\] Thus, Black (1988) and Black *et al*. (1991) believed on cross-cultural adaptation and believe that cross-cultural adjustment is the process of adaptation to living and working in a foreign culture. In other words, the cross-cultural compatibility is a degree of psychological comfort of a person in the host culture.\[[@ref19]\] Berry (1980) and Berry (1997) have known the main results of compatibility beyond just relax and considered levels of citizen knowledge of the host culture, cell culture and continuous interaction with the host nationals.\[[@ref20]\]

In the field of cultural intelligence and social adjustment, researches have been occurring within and outside the country that some of them are noted. Amiri has been doing a research about the relationship between cultural intelligence, social adjustment, and social development in the students that its results have been shown that there is a significant relationship between cultural intelligence and cultural adjustment.\[[@ref21]\] Zaki has been carried out a research in students' adjustment to the university and its relationship with social support that its results have been shown the coping with the school to a middle level, personal adjustment (emotional) to a high-level, adjustment in three areas of academic, social and institutional attachment to a middle level, and social support to relatively high-levels.\[[@ref14]\]

Kumar *et al*., were studying the process interaction and culturally homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Initially, homogeneous groups got higher scores in both the process effectiveness and performance than heterogeneous group, but after education, heterogeneous group got a higher score in process effectiveness and performance.\[[@ref22]\] Pals also were conducted a research entitled in relative importance of cross-cultural adaptation on the American marketing managers and his results showed that there is a significant relationship between oriented education, autarky (self-efficacy), family and cross-cultural aspects of adjustment (including, adjustment of action, interaction, and generalizations).\[[@ref19]\]

Earley and Masakowski conducted a research on the impact of teaching and learning in cultural intelligence of directors. Results show that although a small proportion of cultural intelligence can be seen as an inherent and intrinsic, but undoubtedly the major share of cultural intelligence in each one is due to teaching and learning.\[[@ref23]\] Furthermore, Van Dayn surveyed the relationship between individual\'s personality and the four factors of cultural intelligence and showed that there is a positive relationship between cultural intelligence and the ability of individuals to function effectively in a series of culturally diverse.\[[@ref24]\] I may also have been investigated the effects of cultural intelligence on the effectiveness of cross-cultural negotiation that introduced cultural intelligence as a key factor in the effectiveness of cross-cultural negotiation.\[[@ref25]\]

Ang *et al*., investigated the relationship between cultural intelligence and students' personality. Part of the findings of this research have shown that compatibility and emotional stability are associated with a behavior dimension of cultural intelligence.\[[@ref26]\] Ang *et al*., measured cultural intelligence and its effect on compatibility, decision making, cultural adaptation, and task performance in other research. The results have shown that dimensions of cultural intelligence have a significant relationship with each of these variables.\[[@ref27]\]

Templer *et al*., surveyed the relationship between cultural intelligence and dimensions of all aspects of soci-cultural adjustment. They concluded that there is a significant relationship between the motivational dimension of cultural intelligence and socio-cultural dimension of sustainability.\[[@ref28]\]

Gregory *et al*., conducted a qualitative study on the role of cultural intelligence and cultural discussions of individual projects. In their research, the effect of cross-cultural interaction shows in the activation of adaptive behavior.\[[@ref29]\] DaniJelas also has done a study titled "How teachers understand the cultural intelligence?" the findings have shown a high-level of cultural intelligence and significant predictors of high cultural intelligence in the teachers. Enjoying cultural communications, cross-cultural class experience as a challenge, openness of cultural learning and communicate with people from other cultures were about the consequences of educating teachers in non-homogeneous classes.\[[@ref30]\] Ward *et al*., conducted a study titled in evaluating the predictive validity of cultural intelligence over time in students. In this study, dimensions of cultural intelligence were studied as a predictor of problems in cross-cultural adjustment. According to this matter that the emphasis in this study was in motivation dimension, the results have been shown that there was a negative correlation between the motivational dimension of cultural intelligence and psychological symptoms and social adjustment problems.\[[@ref31]\] With respect to research and its record, this research has been carried out with the aim of determination of the relationship between cultural intelligence and social compatibility in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences dormitories resident students in 2012 in order to improve the students' skills and thus be used to increase mental health. One of cross-cultural spaces is students' dormitories. Some of the students, according to their training and development or their experiences in past crises quickly adapt to new conditions and consist with existing situations, but some others are not able to adapt and cope effectively and efficiently with these conditions and this matter can undermine their mental-health and concluded to their incompetence and their performance drop in their academic status.\[[@ref32]\]

MATERIALS AND METHODS {#sec1-2}
=====================

The research method applied a descriptive and correlation- approach and its population was composed of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences dormitory residents' students who were 2500 persons in 8 dormitories. The sample size was determined of 447 persons. The two steps sampling method have been used, group sampling and random sampling has been occurring at first and second steps and totally 447 persons were selected. Research data were collected through a questionnaire. Early and a localized cultural intelligence questionnaire has been used to measure cultural intelligence that measured individual\'s cultural intelligence in terms of four dimensions of metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral measures to assess social adjustment, California standardized social adjustment was used which was measured family relations, school relations, peer relations, social skills, social interaction, and anti-social relations. The validity of the questionnaires was confirmed by several faculty members, and the Cronbach alpha coefficient of the questionnaire was above 0.70 and also their reliability was confirmed and after data collection, SPSS software was used and data analysis was performed with descriptive statistics and statistical test.

FINDINGS {#sec1-3}
========

Findings showed that frequency percentage of female students were 252 persons (56.4%) and frequency percentage of male students was 195 persons (43.6%). Students frequencies in below 20 year frequency was 94 persons (21%), in 21-25 years age group was 278 persons (62.2%) and 26-30 years age group was 52 persons (11.6%) and age group with more than 30 years was 23 persons (5.1%). Students frequency in bachelor degree was 211 persons (47.2%), in Master of science were 41 persons (9.2%), in PhD degree were 181 persons (40.5%), and in specialty degree was 14 persons (3.1%). Students frequency in Nursing field was 67 persons (14.9%), in pharmacy was 52 persons (11.8%), in dentistry were 32 persons (7.1%), in health with 57 persons (12.7%), in medicine were 125 persons (17.9%), in management was 55 persons (12.4%), in speech therapy was 34 persons (7.6%) and in nutrition was 25 persons (5.6%).

As presented in [Table 1](#T1){ref-type="table"}, research findings showed that according to measured means, which their score is about 100, cultural intelligence mean is 48.5 in students and is evaluated in medium and cultural intelligence dimensions mean are 60.5 in meta-cognitive, 42.8 in cognitive, 57.6 in motivational and 32.7 in behavioral. The social compatibility mean is also 67.7.

###### 

Cultural intelligence mean, cultural intelligence dimensions, and social compatibility (from 100)

![](JEHP-3-100-g001)

As observed in [Table 2](#T2){ref-type="table"}, there is a direct meaningful relationship between cultural intelligence and social compatibility (*r* = 0.242, *P* = 0.000) in students (*P* \< 0.001). Furthermore, there is a direct meaningful relationship between cultural intelligence metacognitive dimension and social compatibility (*r* = 0.364, *P* = 0.000) and cultural intelligence motivation dimension and social compatibility (*r* = 0.043, *P* = 0.367) in students (*P* \< 0.001). However, there is not any significant relationship between cultural intelligence cognitive dimension and social compatibility (*r* = −0.081, *P* = 0.089) in students (*P* \> 0.05).

###### 

Pearson correlation factor between cultural intelligence and social compatibility in students

![](JEHP-3-100-g002)

DISCUSSION {#sec1-4}
==========

The results of the research showed that female answerers (56.4%) were more than males (43.6%) that its reason was rooted in the number of female students in the university. The most frequency was allotted to 21-25 years age group (62.2%) and the lowest was related to higher than 30 years age group (5.1%) that including students in complementary education. Furthermore, the most frequency was related to Bachelor of Science (47.2%) and the lowest frequency was related to PhD (3.1%). In his research, many disciplines have been participated that its most frequency was related to medicine (27.9%) and its lowest was related to nutrition (5.65%).

In cultural intelligence mean and its dimensions and social compatibility survey, data analysis states that cultural intelligence mean in the students citizen in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences dormitories in percent was neared to medium level (48.5%) and their social compatibility was higher than medium level (67.7%), also meta cognitive dimension mean in students was 60.5% and motivational dimension mean in students with 57.6 percent was higher than medium level. However, cultural intelligence cognitive dimension mean in students (42.8) and behavioral dimension mean in students (32) were lower than medium. This result presents the necessity of attending to the cultural intelligence behavioral and cognitive dimension and their strengthening these two dimensions in students.

In the relationship between cultural intelligence and social compatibility survey in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences dormitory resident students, Pearson correlation factor presents this fact that there is a meaningful direct relationship (*P* \< 0.001) between students' cultural intelligence and social compatibility (*r* = 0.242, *P* = 0.000). Hence, students with higher cultural intelligence enjoy higher social compatibility and with their cultural intelligence strengthening, their social compatibility will be increased. This result is along with a varied and his colleagues,\[[@ref31]\] Ang *et al*.,\[[@ref27]\] Templer *et al*.,\[[@ref28]\] and Earley and Ang,\[[@ref8]\] who was supposed cultural intelligence as a person\'s compatibility predictor. Furthermore, it is along with Earley and Peterson\'s research\[[@ref33]\] that reasoned that cultural intelligence directly influenced from cross-cultural compatibility.

In an analysis of the relationship between cultural intelligence metacognitive and social compatibility in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences dormitory resident students, a Pearson correlation factor showed that there is a direct significant relationship between cultural intelligence metacognitive relationship and social compatibility (*R* = 0.364, *P* = 0.000) (*P* \< 0.001). Hence, dormitory resident students that achieved higher scores in cultural intelligence metacognitive dimension have higher in social compatibility. This result along with Templer *et al*.,\[[@ref28]\] research that were surveyed the relationship between cultural intelligence dimension and social compatibility and proved positive significant relationship between them. So along cultural intelligence metacognitive dimension increasing with students, their compatibility can be increased.

In the relationship between cultural intelligence cognitive dimension and social compatibility survey at Isfahan University of Medical Sciences dormitories resident students, a Pearson correlation factor showed that there is not any significant relationship between cultural intelligence cognitive dimension and social compatibility (*r* = 0.043, *P* = 0.367) (*P* \> 0.05). The absence of any significant relationship between cultural intelligence cognitive dimension and social compatibility in this hypothesis showed that other factors except cognitive dimension would be effected on social compatibility and having just cognition on the other culture\'s concepts could not be created social compatibility with students.

In cultural intelligence behavior dimension and social compatibility relationship survey of students, a Pearson correlation factor hasn't shown a significant relationship (*r* = −0.081, *P* = 0.089) (*P* \> 0.05), which said that other factors except cultural intelligence behavior dimension would be effective on social compatibility and behavior dimension could not be an increasing factor of social compatibility in dormitory students.

In the analysis of cultural intelligence motivation dimension and social compatibility in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences dormitories resident students, a Pearson correlation factor showed that there is a direct significant relationship between cultural intelligence motivation dimension and social compatibility (*r* = −0.386, *P* = 0.000) and (*P* \< 0.001). Hence, in students who are resident in dormitories and have higher scores in cultural intelligence motivation dimension, their compatibility would be increased by cultural intelligence motivation dimension, addition and this result is along with Chirkow *et al*., results' findings. They showed that motivation self-efficacy caused to social, psychological, and practical compatibility and in the other words caused by increasing their educational performance and being good though in immigrant students.\[[@ref31]\] However, along with Ang *et al*.,\[[@ref27]\] and Templer *et al*.,\[[@ref28]\] their studies showed that motivation dimension predicts the interaction and compatibility and totally ceased to compatibility. Ward *et al*.,\[[@ref31]\] showed in a research that motivation dimension has a reverse significant relationship with depression and social problems during the cross-cultural period. However, it is an important factor in cross-cultural compatibility which is along this research result because depression and social compatibility can be caused to non-compatibility.

According to this research, it is proposed:

With attending to cultural variety in Iran, familiarity to various cultures and healthy behavior methods in cross-cultural relationships should be presented to the studentsThe most effective cultural intelligence education methods and social compatibility in dormitory students should be researchedNew students should be examined by cultural intelligence and social compatibility and persons who achieved higher scores in cultural intelligence and social compatibility divided in physical area of dormitories purposely in order to prevent tensions and breakings, also seclusion that caused by compatibility and cultural problems between students who lived in dormitories. However, in this evaluation students with a low cultural intelligence and social compatibility should be educatedCultural managers and experts in various levels in the university especially dormitories' responsible educated in the cultural intelligence.

**Source of Support:** Nil

**Conflict of Interest:** None declared
