S'pore ranked among least corrupt in global index: Transparency Int'l
LONDON: The global anti-corruption group, Transparency International, has released its annual report, which grades 180 countries for their perceived levels of corruption.
The report concluded that the divide between developing and wealthy nations remained sharp.
The Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) scores countries on a scale from zero to ten, with zero indicating high levels of perceived corruption and ten indicating low levels of perceived corruption.
Singapore came in joint fourth place with Sweden with an index score of 9.3, while Finland, Denmark and New Zealand topped the Transparency International's CPI with a score of 9.4.
However, the outlook for the region was mixed, with Myanmar coming joint last, and the Philippines, Cambodia and Bangladesh also near the bottom.
This year's report said persistent corruption in low income countries needed to be tackled internationally, and it drew a strong link between poverty and corruption.
Huguette Labelle, Chair of the Transparency International, said: "There is no question that countries like Singapore, New Zealand and Australia have to play an increasing role in the region by supporting those countries that require a lot of assistance."
Transparency International said the main responsibility for fighting corruption must rest with developing countries themselves, but the developed nations also have a major role to play.
Dr Cobus De Swardt, Managing Director of Transparency International, said: "We cannot have a situation where the north continues to point a finger at corrupt countries in the south, or Africa in particular, when its companies as well as financial markets from those countries continue to facilitate money laundering."
At the bottom of the list jointly are Somalia and Myanmar. Transparency International officials said the current demonstrations led by the monks in Myanmar are a textbook example of what happens when a country's civilians protest against corruption and repression.
Dr Cobus De Swardt said: "The events that we see unfolding now (show that) corruption is most definitely one of the important aspects, as you continue to see the wealth of that country being located in the hands of the few and the system being maintained through processes that are not accountable, that are not open, and transparent and that benefit the few."
He added that while much work still has to be done, Transparency International is heartened by some of the aspects of the report as well as global efforts to recover monies taken out of the countries by corrupt leaders and businessmen.
The CPI is important for private and public sector inward investment opportunities. - CNA/vm
Una investigación anual de Transparencia Internacional (TI) de Berlin, Alemania, ha revelado que los dos países menos corruptos son Dinamarca y Finlandia, mientras que los más corruptos son Birmania y Somalia.

El Índice de percepción de corrupción anual incluye a 180 países distintos. Los resultados fueron presentados por el presidente de TI, Hansjoerg Elshorst, quien señaló que el estudio representa la "percepción general de corrupción y la lucha contra la corrupción".

También comentó en el hecho que cinco de las naciones menos corruptas son nórdicas – Dinamarca, Finlandia, Suecia, Islandia y Noruega, las cuales tuvieron resultados óptimos y altos. Además, agregó que el motivo primordial, por el cual llegaron a sus respectivos altos rankings, es que todos tienen sistemas administrativos transparentes. Otra nación que puntuó alto fue Nueva Zelanda, que junto con Finlandia y Dinamarca tienen 9,4 puntos sobre diez.

Por su parte, Birmania y Somalia tienen 1,4 puntos.

Entre tanto, Costa Rica, Croacia, Cuba, República Checa, Dominica, Italia, Macedonia, Rumania y Surinam fueron comentadas por haber obtenido mejores resultados marcando sus esfuerzos anti-corrupción. Entre otros resultados, Singapur se encuentra cuarto con Suecia, el Reino Unido duodécimo, Alemania en el puesto 16, Francia en el 19, Estados Unidos en el 20, China en el 71 y Rusia en el 143.

La diferencia entre Finlandia y Rusia, que marcó 2,4, es tan abrupta que se cree que la frontera entre los dos países presenta el cambio más repentino de niveles de corrupción en el mundo, mucho más que la infame frontera de Estados Unidos y México.

Elshorst siguió en su presentación pidiendo más esfuerzos internacionales para combatir la corrupción, y también pidió a Alemania que ratificara la Convención de la ONU contra la Corrupción.