Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play. Gordon Brown has admitted a "bad and disappointing" election for Labour, as the party suffered its worst council results in at least 40 years. BBC research suggests Labour won 24% of votes cast in England and Wales, behind the Tories on 44% and Lib Dems on 25%. In total Labour lost 331 councillors and key councils like Reading. Tory gains include Bury and North Tyneside. Mr Brown insists his party will learn lessons. David Cameron called it a "big moment" for the Conservative Party. Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg said his party had "regained momentum" by gaining 30 councillors despite its projected national share of the vote falling on last year. General secretary 'quits' He claimed Labour had lost touch with ordinary people and that Mr Brown had lost his ability to lead. The margin is similar to the drubbing received by Tory Prime Minister John Major in council elections in 1995, two years before he was ejected from Downing Street by Tony Blair. KEY WINS & LOSSES Conservative wins - Basingstoke & Deane, Elmbridge, Southampton, Bury, Harlow, Maidstone, North Tyneside, Nuneaton & Bedworth, Redditch, Rossendale, Solihull, Vale of Glamorgan, West Lindsey, Wyre Forest Conservative losses - Colchester, Coventry Labour wins - Durham, Slough Labour losses - Blaenau Gwent, Caerphilly, Flintshire, Hartlepool, Merthyr Tydfil, Reading, Torfaen, Wolverhampton Liberal Democrats win - Burnley, Kingston-Upon-Hull, Sheffield, St Albans Liberal Democrats lose - West Lindsey, Liverpool, Pendle
Elections latest at-a-glance Johnson 'ahead' in mayoral race Analysis: Testing times ahead Attention is now focused on the race to be London mayor, where Conservative Boris Johnson is seeking to defeat Labour's Ken Livingstone. Counting of the 2.4m votes began at 0830 BST with a result not now expected before 2400 BST. With about half of the votes counted, Mr Johnson was ahead in nine out of 14 areas on first preference votes. London's Evening Standard newspaper has called it a win for Mr Johnson. But as election fever gripped Westminster, Labour had further bad news as the party's newly appointed general secretary, David Pitt-Watson - a City fund manager - decided not to take up the position. Mr Pitt-Watson, believed to have been Mr Brown's choice, was appointed after Peter Watt resigned over the row about donations from businessman David Abrahams. And senior Labour backbencher Ian Gibson said Mr Brown had six months - up to the party conference - to move the party forward or risk losing the next general election. In the local elections - where results continue to come in - the Tories have had a 4% higher share of the national vote than in last year's local polls. Such a share in a general election would have the potential to give the party a Commons majority of 138. Mr Brown told reporters: "It's clear to me that this has been a disappointing night, indeed a bad night for Labour." He conceded that the government had "lessons to learn", but insisted: "My job is to listen and to lead." The test of leadership is not what happens in a period of success but what happens in difficult circumstances
Gordon Brown
Labour loses in Welsh heartlands Cameron hails 'big moment' Clegg hails Lib Dem showing He blamed "difficult economic circumstances" for much of the bad performance, and claimed that measures taken by the government to counter problems would become clear "over the next few months". "I think people want to be assured, and indeed people are questioning and want to be assured, that the government will steer them through these difficult times." He added: "The test of leadership is not what happens in a period of success but what happens in difficult circumstances." Mr Cameron said: "This is a very big moment for the Conservative Party - but I don't want anyone to think that we would deserve to win an election on the back of a failing government. "I want us to really prove to people that we can make the changes that they want to see, in terms of schools and hospitals and crime and the other issues that really matter to all of us. "That's what I'm going to devote myself and my party to over the next few months." 'No crisis' The Tories have gained control of several councils including Southampton, Bury, Harlow, Maidstone and North Tyneside. BBC analysis suggests Labour's vote appears to have fallen most heavily in its traditional heartlands - suggesting MPs were right to fear the 10p tax row had damaged their core support. RESULTS ROUND-UP General turnout looks like it will be about 35%, similar to last year Projected national vote share: Tories 44%, Lib Dems 25%, Labour 24% Worst share of national vote for Labour in recent history Surprise Tory win in Southampton and solid progress in north Greens and BNP make little progress nationally, UKIP up 1
Tories seize power in Southampton Conservatives celebrate Bury win Analysis: Martha Kearney's verdict In Wales, Labour lost control of five councils and could also be out of office in another. Labour was defeated in its south Wales valley heartland areas of Merthyr Tydfil, Blaenau Gwent, Torfaen and Caerphilly. It also lost Flintshire. Ministers were trying to put a brave face on the results and pledging to listen to voters' concerns. Deputy Labour leader Harriet Harman told BBC Radio 4's Today programme the results had been "very disappointing indeed", but said the elections had taken place against a background of rising economic concerns. "We didn't respond early enough to those groups of people who were going to lose out as a result of the change in the 10p rate which overall benefits lower income people but there were some people who lost out and we didn't react early enough," she said. Labour's chief whip Geoff Hoon said: "There's no crisis. This isn't something that's going to affect the fundamental stability of the government." Liberal Democrat leader Mr Clegg told BBC Breakfast: "We were 13% a few months ago, we're now 25%. We've over-taken Labour, we've taken seats off the Conservatives, we've taken seats off Labour. "If you call that a disappointment then we inhabit different planets. I am actually delighted, we are regaining momentum." London contest More than 4,000 seats on 159 councils were up for grabs in Thursday's elections, as well as the London mayoralty and assembly. All seats are up for election in the 22 Welsh unitary authorities. HAVE YOUR SAY I voted for the Conservatives and I'm glad they won my local election Matt, Bedworth Meanwhile, a BBC opinion poll suggests Tory leader David Cameron is seen as more effective than Mr Brown or Mr Clegg. Of 1,005 people who took part in the poll, 68% said Mr Cameron was an asset to his party, compared with 43% for Mr Clegg and 42% for Mr Brown. Mr Brown's reputation for economic competence has also taken a blow. At this time last year 48% said that Labour could be trusted to run the country's economy, little different from the 53% who did so in 2002. But this year the figure has fallen to 32%. However, only 36% said they trust the Conservatives to run the economy - 10 points down on last year, and little better than the figure of 32% recorded for the party in 2002.
E-mail this to a friend Printable version Bookmark with: Delicious
Digg
reddit
Facebook
StumbleUpon What are these?
Im Vereinigten Königreich wächst der Druck auf den dort amtierenden Ministerpräsidenten Gordon Brown. Der Labour-Politiker hatte das Amt des Premierministers im Juni des vergangenen Jahres von seinem Vorgänger und Parteifreund Tony Blair übernommen und sein Amtsantritt war damals mit großen Hoffnungen verbunden. 
Brown (Archiv) 
Bis zum heutigen Tage wurde Browns Regierung jedoch immer unpopulärer. Dazu könnten die angespannte Wirtschaftslage –auf die Brown in der öffentlichen Wahrnehmung keine angemessenen Antworten hat– und eine umstrittende Steuerreform, die später teilweise revidiert wurde, beigetragen haben.  Auch aus Sicht der Partei desaströse Ergebnisse bei den Kommunalwahlen, die vor einigen Monaten stattfanden, schwächten Browns Position weiter. 

Infolgedessen ist der innerparteiliche Druck auf Brown, sein Amt als Parteivorsitzender aufzugeben, und bei den nächsten Parlamentswahlen einem anderen die Rolle des Spitzenkandidaten zu überlassen, in der letzten Zeit immer weiter gestiegen. 
So berichteten britische Medien jetzt, dass einige -namentlich nicht genannte- Parteifreunde Browns, die früher Ministerposten innehatten, ein Programm vorbereiteten, das die Labour-Partei wieder stärker von David Cameron und seiner Konservativen Partei abheben soll. Derzeit beträgt der Rückstand Labours auf die Konservativen in Umfragen etwa 20 Prozentpunkte. Dem Bekanntwerden dieser Planungen vorausgegangen war wiederum eine Erklärung der Labour-Politiker Alistair Darling, Harriet Harman und John Denham. In dieser machten die drei Minister deutlich, sie unterstützten Gordon Brown, denn er habe, so Denham, „ein tiefes Verständnis für die Bedürfnisse dieses Landes“. Zudem betonte Denham noch, dass es die Aufgabe des Kabinetts sei, die Nachricht zu verbreiten, dass der richtige Man bereits am richtigen Platz sitze. Diese Aussage wiederum kann als Kritik an dem teilweise öffentlich ausgetragenen Richtungsstreit der Partei interpretiert werden.

Von diesem zeugt -neben weiteren Äußerungen verschiedenster Politiker für oder gegen Brown- auch ein vor wenigen Tagen im „Guardian“ veröffentlichter Essay von David Miliband, der Außenminister im Kabinett Browns ist. In diesem Artikel fordert Miliband, Labour müsse „demütiger über begangene Fehler“ aber auch die erreichten Erfolge stärker herausstellen. Dann zählt Miliband einige Kritikpunkte an der eigenen Regierungsarbeit auf (man hätte den NHS früher reformieren müssen, man hätte darauf achten müssen, man hätte stärker auf die Reduktion des Kohlenstoffdioxid-Ausstosses achten müssen, etc.), schreibt aber auch, dass die Opposition um David Cameron keine Lösungen zu den Problemen des Landes zu bieten habe.

Aufsehen erregte der Artikel einerseits aufgrund dieser Aufzählung von Misserfolgen der Regierung, die Gordon Brown öffentlich positiver bewertete als Miliband, und andererseits, da Brown in ihm kein einziges Mal erwähnt wird, obwohl es in ihm schließlich um die Partei geht, deren Vorsitzender Brown ist.

Beobachter werten die Veröffentlichung des Artikels zu diesem Zeitpunkt als gezieltes Manöver Milibands, dem bereits seit längerem Ambitionen nachgesagt werden, die Nachfolge Browns anzutreten. Dieser Kritik entgegnete Miliband, es sei seine Pflicht, seine Sichtweisen auf die Richtung, in die die Regierung sich bewegt, darzulegen. Zudem unterstütze habe er Gordon Brown immer unterstützt. Unabhängig davon, ob Miliband nun Ambitionen zur Ablösung Browns hat oder nicht: Eine im „Daily Telegraph“ veröffentlichte Umfrage ergab, dass eine Spitzenkandidatur Labours Chancen nicht nur nicht verbessern würde, sondern dass diese sogar einen weiteren Stimmenverlust um zwei Prozentpunkte zur Konsequenz hätte.