(CNN) -- A federal judge in California on Wednesday struck down the state's ban on same-sex marriage, ruling that voter-approved Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution -- handing supporters of gay rights a major victory in a case that both sides say is sure to wind up before the U.S. Supreme Court.
The 136-page opinion, issued by Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker in San Francisco, is an initial step in what will likely be a lengthy fight over California's Proposition 8, which defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman.
At stake in the trial was whether California's ban on same-sex marriage violates gay couples' rights to equal protection and due process, as protected by the U.S. Constitution.
The high-profile case is being watched closely by both supporters and opponents of same-sex marriage, as many say it is destined to make its way to the U.S. Supreme Court. If it does, the case could result in a landmark decision on whether people in the United States are allowed to marry people of the same sex.
Same-sex marriage is currently legal in five U.S. states and in the District of Columbia, while civil unions are permitted in New Jersey. The five states are Massachusetts, Connecticut, Vermont, Iowa and New Hampshire.
"Proposition 8 fails to advance any rational basis in singling out gay men and lesbians for denial of a marriage license. Indeed, the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California Constitution the notion that opposite-sex couples are superior to same-sex couples," Walker, who was appointed to the federal bench by former President Ronald Reagan, wrote in his opinion.
"Race restrictions on marital partners were once common in most states but are now seen as archaic, shameful or even bizarre," he added. "Gender no longer forms an essential part of marriage; marriage under law is a union of equals."
In a separate order, Walker also granted supporters of Proposition 8 a temporary stay, which stops his decision from taking immediate effect. They had argued, prior to his ruling, that same-sex marriages would be performed soon after his decision and could be complicated by rulings and appeals farther down the legal road.
Walker gave both sides in the case until Friday to submit their responses to the order.
Elated supporters of same-sex marriage gathered to celebrate the judge's opinion in the Castro district of San Francisco. After speeches and songs, they began a march to city hall. People waved rainbow flags and U.S. flags, and carried signs that read, "We all deserve the freedom to marry," and "Separate is Unequal." Similar rallies unfolded in cities across California -- including Los Angeles and San Diego.
"For our entire lives, our government and the law have treated us as unequal. This decision to ensure that our constitutional rights are as protected as everyone else's makes us incredibly proud of our country," said Kristin Perry, a plaintiff.
Perry and Sandy Stier, along with Jeffrey Zarrillo and Paul Katami, are the two couples at the heart of the case, which if appealed would go next to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals before possibly heading to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Opponents of same-sex marriage have said their best bet lies with higher courts and vowed to appeal the federal judge's ruling.
In a national survey, conducted by Gallup in May, 53 percent of respondents said same-sex marriages should not be recognized by law, while 44 percent said they should.
Proposition 8 is part of a long line of seesaw rulings, court cases, debates and protests over the controversial issue of same-sex marriage. It passed in California with some 52 percent of the vote in November 2008.
"Big surprise! We expected nothing different from Judge Vaughn Walker, after the biased way he conducted this trial," said Brian Brown, president of the National Organization for Marriage. "With a stroke of his pen, Judge Walker has overruled the votes and values of 7 million Californians who voted for marriage as one man and one woman."
Un juez federal estadounidense  declaró inconstitucional la Proposición 8 que prohíbe el matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo en ese país por violar las claúsulas de Protección de la Igualdad y la del Debido Proceso garantizadas por la enmienda 14 de la Carta Magna.

"Los actores desafiaron las claúsulas de Protección de la Igualdad y del Debido Proceso de la Decimocuarta Enmienda, escribió el juez jefe del distrito de Estados Unidos Vaughn R. Walker, cada desafío es meritorio independientemente y la Proposición 8 contradice el derecho de casarse y crea una clasificación irracional en la base de la orientación sexual." escribió el juez en el fallo.

La Proposición 8 votada mediante referendum en noviembre de 2008 prohíbe el matrimonio de personas del mismo sexo en el estado y había sido declarada legal por un fallo de la Suprema Corte de California del 15 de mayo de 2008. Los matrimonios celebrados antes de la fecha no se anularían.

El caso, el juicio Perry contra Arnold Scwarzzeneger, ha sido escuchado por el juez Walker. Anticipando la derrota, una coalición pro-proposición 8 presentando una moción para dejar pendiente una apelación y que la medida no tenga efecto hasta que no la confirme la Corte de Apelación del noveno circuito; ambas partes consideran inevitable una apelación.

Jennifer C. Pizer declarando por los derechos de los grupos LGBT dijo: