UNIVERSALITY OF NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY REMAINS PRIORITY, STRESSES
SECRETARY-GENERAL IN MARKING FORTIETH OPENING-FOR-SIGNATURE ANNIVERSARY
Following is the statement by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon on the fortieth anniversary of the opening for signature of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, 1 July:
Today marks the fortieth anniversary of the opening for signature of the landmark Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, the only legally binding multilateral nuclear disarmament instrument and the cornerstone of the non-proliferation regime.
The grand bargain, negotiated and embodied in the Non-Proliferation Treaty -- to prevent proliferation, advance disarmament and assure the right to use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes -- was signed by 59 States in Washington, D.C., Moscow and London on 1 July 1968. Since then, 190 States have joined the Treaty, making it the most universally supported international disarmament and non-proliferation instrument.
The Treaty has suffered serious setbacks and faces multiple challenges to its credibility, though it has also seen steady progress and significant measured success.
A number of nuclear-weapon States have recently outlined or initiated measures to reduce their arsenals, accelerate dismantlement, close some nuclear test sites and reduce their reliance on their deployed weapons. These efforts should be recognized and commended.
Support for the goals of nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation is overwhelming. The International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards agreements are in force in 160 States -- of which 88 have also agreed to the Additional Protocol. Nearly two thirds of the world’s States are signatories to nuclear-weapon-free zone treaties.
Yet, tens of thousands of nuclear weapons remain deployed and stockpiled, and significant deeper, irreversible and verifiable cuts are needed. Nuclear proliferation -- whether by States or non-State actors -- threatens everyone, and therefore requires global cooperation in addressing non-compliance, in resolving concerns over nuclear programmes and in ensuring the most reliable controls over nuclear materials.
At the same time, the benefits of peaceful nuclear applications have reached nearly everyone and demands for nuclear energy are rising dramatically. The right to peaceful uses of nuclear technology should be exercised in conformity with non-proliferation obligations. Due regard should also be given to the responsible development of peaceful uses of nuclear energy.
Achieving universality of the Treaty remains a priority. We are a long way from a nuclear-weapon-free world and the recent revival of interest to achieve this vision is welcome and promising.
The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons continues to be the most effective multilateral instrument for preventing nuclear proliferation and achieving disarmament. We need a strong Non-Proliferation Treaty and we must reinforce and strengthen it to meet the challenges of the day.
* *** *
UNO-Generalsekretär Ban Ki-moon begrüßte in seiner Erklärung zum 40. Jahrestag des Atomwaffensperrvertrags die jüngste Interessenbelebung an einer atomwaffenfreien Welt und spielte damit möglicherweise auf Äußerungen von Barack Obama und John McCain im US-Präsidentschaftswahlkampf an, die beide signalisierten, eine atomwaffenfreie Welt anzustreben. Ban Ki-moon forderte dazu die Globalisierung des Atomwaffensperrvertrags, dem bislang einige Atomwaffenstaaten nicht beigetreten sind.

Das russische Außenministerium würdigte den Jahrestag mit einer Presseerklärung. Russland werde die Weiterverbreitung des Vertrages sowie Überlegungen unterstützen, die zu seiner vollständigen Umsetzung führen könnten.

In einer Presseerklärung des deutschen Bundesaußenministers Frank-Walter Steinmeier heißt es zum Jahrestag unter anderem: „Das Ziel des Atomwaffensperrvertrages ist und bleibt die Schaffung einer atomwaffenfreien Welt. Die Bundesregierung wird sich unverändert und mit aller Kraft hierfür einsetzen.“

Xanthe Hall, Sprecherin der Kampagne „unsere zukunft - atomwaffenfrei“, kritisierte die NATO-Strategie der nuklearen Teilhabe als Verstoß gegen Artikel 2 des Atomwaffensperrvertrages und forderte die deutsche Bundesregierung auf, sich für den Abzug der US-Atomwaffen aus Deutschland einzusetzen.