GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC. *Chart shows local time price change % 160.70 -23.57 -12.79
More data on this share price Goldman Sachs, the Wall Street powerhouse, has been accused of defrauding investors by America's financial regulator. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) alleges that Goldman failed to disclose conflicts of interest. The claims concern Goldman's marketing of sub-prime mortgage investments just as the US housing market faltered. Goldman rejected the SEC's allegations, saying that it would "vigorously" defend its reputation. News that the SEC was pressing civil fraud charges against Goldman and one of its London-based vice presidents, Fabrice Tourre, sent shares in the investment bank tumbling 12%. The narrative of what transpired, as set out by the SEC, is quite the financial thriller
Robert Peston, BBC Business Editor
Peston's Picks: Why Goldman may owe UK taxpayers $841m The SEC says Goldman failed to disclose "vital information" that one of its clients, Paulson & Co, helped choose which securities were packaged into the mortgage portfolio. These securities were sold to investors in 2007. But Goldman did not disclose that Paulson, one of the world's largest hedge funds, had bet that the value of the securities would fall. The SEC said: "Unbeknownst to investors, Paulson... which was posed to benefit if the [securities] defaulted, played a significant role in selecting which [securities] should make up the portfolio." "In sum, Goldman Sachs arranged a transaction at Paulson's request in which Paulson heavily influenced the selection of the portfolio to suit its economic interests," said the Commission. Housing collapse The SEC alleges that investors in the mortgage securities, packaged into a vehicle called Abacus, lost more than $1bn (£650m) in the US housing collapse. The whole building is about to collapse anytime now... Only potential survivor, the fabulous Fabrice...
Email by Fabrice Tourre Mr Tourre was principally behind the creation of Abacus, which agreed its deal with Paulson in April 2007, the SEC said. The Commission alleges that Mr Tourre knew the market in mortgage-backed securities was about to be hit well before this date. The SEC's court document quotes an email from Mr Tourre to a friend in January 2007. "More and more leverage in the system. Only potential survivor, the fabulous Fab[rice Tourre]... standing in the middle of all these complex, highly leveraged, exotic trades he created without necessarily understanding all of the implications of those monstrosities!!!" Goldman denied any wrongdoing, saying in a brief statement: "The SEC's charges are completely unfounded in law and fact and we will vigorously contest them and defend the firm and its reputation." The firm said that, rather than make money from the deal, it lost $90m. The two investors that lost the most money, German bank IKB and ACA Capital Management, were two "sophisticated mortgage investors" who knew the risk, Goldman said. And nor was there any failure of disclosure, because "market makers do not disclose the identities of a buyer to a seller and vice versa." John Paulson made billions of dollars in the financial markets Calls to Mr Tourre's office were referred to the Goldman press office. Paulson has not been charged. Asked why the SEC did not also pursue a case against Paulson, Enforcement Director Robert Khuzami told reporters: "It was Goldman that made the representations to investors. Paulson did not." The firm's owner, John Paulson - no relation to former US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson - made billions of dollars betting against sub-prime mortgage securities. In a statement, Paulson & Co. said: "As the SEC said at its press conference, Paulson is not the subject of this complaint, made no misrepresentations and is not the subject of any charges." 'Regulation risk' Goldman, arguably the world's most prestigious investment bank, had escaped relatively unscathed from the global financial meltdown. This is the first time regulators have acted against a Wall Street deal that allegedly helped investors take advantage of the US housing market collapse. The charges come as US lawmakers get tough on Wall Street practices that helped cause the financial crisis. Among proposals being considered by Congress is tougher rules for complex investments like those involved in the alleged Goldman fraud. Observers said the SEC's move dealt a blow to Goldman's standing. "It undermines their brand," said Simon Johnson, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a Goldman critic. "It undermines their political clout." Analyst Matt McCormick of Bahl & Gaynor said that the allegation could "be a fulcrum to push for even tighter regulation". "Goldman has a fight in front of it," he said.
Bookmark with: Delicious
Digg
reddit
Facebook
StumbleUpon What are these? E-mail this to a friend Printable version
US bank Goldman Sachs has been accused of fraud by the American regulator Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).



According to the SEC, Goldman Sachs failed to inform investors of a conflict of interest in the banks' marketing of sub-prime mortgage investments, which were being sold at a time of uncertainty in the US housing market.  The SEC says that a Goldman subsidiary, Paulson & Co, had been involved in the selection of securities included in the mortgage investments.  It had not been disclosed to investors that Paulson had bet that the value of the investments would fall, benefiting Paulson but not those who bought the investments.

The securities, which were combined into a package called Abacus that was sold to investors, lost over $1 billion during the collapse of the US housing industry.  According to the SEC, Goldman, Paulson, and the creator of Abacus, a vice-president of Goldman Sachs named Fabrice Tourre, all knew that the housing market was going to collapse, but continued to sell Abacus despite the risks.  

Tourre had been in command of selecting the investments within Abacus, and then was the person responsible for selling it to investors.  He had told those who invested in Abacus that its components had been selected by an independent party, ACA Management.

In all, 99% of the investments within Abacus were downgraded, and investors lost upwards of a billion US dollars.

The SEC alleged that "Goldman Sachs arranged a transaction at Paulson's request in which Paulson heavily influenced the selection of the portfolio to suit its economic interests."  In a short response from Goldman, the bank said that "The SEC's charges are completely unfounded in law and fact and we will vigorously contest them and defend the firm and its reputation."