Did his voters get deterred from voting for him, but that nevertheless they voted for him, even though they did not (due to either reason he cites: bribery, intimidation, the works)?
¿Se disuadió a los votantes de que lo votasen o, de lo contrario, lo hubieran hecho, aún sabiendo que no lo hicieron (debido a ambas razones citadas: soborno, intimidación, trabajos)?