In my view it is a failure of nerve to back away from something that is so strongly indicated by the evidence simply because you think the conclusion has unwelcome philosophical implications.
Minu meelest räägib see julgusepuudusest, kui millestki, millele tõendusmaterjal vääramatult osutab, taganetakse pelgalt sel põhjusel, et sellest tulenevaid filosoofilisi järeldusi peetakse mittesoovitavaks.