Their opinion was that a doctor’s chief obligation is to save life in the best way he can, so such a contract would be invalid from the start, regardless of the patient’s religious convictions.
Nende arvamus oli, et kuna arsti peamiseks kohustuseks on päästa elu parimal viisil nagu ta oskab, oleks niisugune leping algusest peale kehtetu, vaatamata sellele, missugused on patsiendi usulised veendumused.