Translate the following English sentence to French:
"Why is it that for the banana trade you are advocating pure and simple liberalisation with effect from 2006, whereas in the case of meat, milk and cereals, which absorb 68% of EAGGF Guarantee Section resources, you refer to the special characteristics of European agriculture, as the Commission did in Seattle?"
Pourquoi prône-t-on la libéralisation pure et simple du commerce de la banane à partir de 2006, alors que pour la viande, le lait et les céréales, qui absorbent 86 % du budget du FEOGA, on invoque, comme l' a fait la Commission à Seattle, la spécificité de l' agriculture européenne ?