user
Instruction
This is a table fact verification task. The goal of this task is to distinguish whether the given statement is entailed or refuted by the given table.


Table
Table Title: outback (region)
Table Content:
| local government area | type | major town | land area (km square) | pop 2006 | density km 2 | towns | est |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| roxby downs | municipal council | roxby downs | 110 | 4292 | 39018 | 2 | 1982 |
| coober pedy | district council | coober pedy | 77 , 8 | 1996 | 25656 | 1 | 1987 |
| anangu pitjantjatjara yankunytjatjara | aboriginal council | umuwa | 102650 | 2204 | 21 | 18 | 1981 |
| maralinga tjarutja 1) | aboriginal council | oak valley | 102863 , 6 | 105 | 1 | 1 | 1984 |
| yalata | aboriginal council | yalata | 4563 | 100 | 22 | 1 | 1994 |
| nepabunna | aboriginal council | nepabunna , south australia | 76 , 4 | 49 | 641 | 1 | 1998 |
| outback areas community development trust | unincorporated area | leigh creek | 624339.0 | 3750 | 6 | 36 | 1978 |


Statement
yalata be a district council


Answer Format
The final answer should be either "entailed" or "refuted" and use the following format:
```json
{
    "answer": "entailed" or "refuted"
}
```
rule
["refuted"]