user
Instruction
This is a table fact verification task. The goal of this task is to distinguish whether the given statement is entailed or refuted by the given table.


Table
Table Title: greenville braves
Table Content:
| year | team name | wins | losses | w - l % | manager |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1963 | greenville braves | 59 | 65 | 0.476% | jim fanning and paul snyder |
| 1964 | greenville braves | 63 | 63 | 0.500% | bill steinecke and jimmy brown |
| 1984 | greenville braves | 80 | 67 | 0.567% | bobby dews and leo mazzone |
| 1985 | greenville braves | 70 | 74 | 0.486% | jim beauchamp |
| 1986 | greenville braves | 73 | 71 | 0.486% | jim beauchamp |
| 1987 | greenville braves | 70 | 74 | 0.786% | jim beauchamp |
| 1988 | greenville braves | 87 | 57 | 0.604% | buddy bailey and russ nixon |
| 1989 | greenville braves | 70 | 69 | 0.504% | buddy bailey |
| 1990 | greenville braves | 57 | 87 | 0.396% | buddy bailey |
| 1991 | greenville braves | 88 | 56 | 0.611% | chris chambliss |
| 1992 | greenville braves | 100 | 43 | 0.699% | grady little |
| 1993 | greenville braves | 70 | 67 | 0.511% | bruce kimm |
| 1994 | greenville braves | 73 | 63 | 0.537% | bruce benedict |
| 1995 | greenville braves | 59 | 83 | 0.415% | bruce benedict |
| 1996 | greenville braves | 58 | 82 | 0.414% | jeff cox |
| 1997 | greenville braves | 74 | 66 | 0.529% | randy ingle |
| 1998 | greenville braves | 67 | 72 | 0.482% | randy ingle |
| 1999 | greenville braves | 58 | 80 | 0.420% | paul runge |
| 2000 | greenville braves | 68 | 71 | 0.489% | paul runge |
| 2001 | greenville braves | 60 | 79 | 0.432% | paul runge |
| 2002 | greenville braves | 65 | 63 | 0.485% | brian snitker |
| 2003 | greenville braves | 68 | 70 | 0.493% | brian snitker |
| 2004 | greenville braves | 63 | 76 | 0.453% | brian snitker |


Statement
the greenville brave have more win under jeff cox than any other manager


Answer Format
The final answer should be either "entailed" or "refuted" and use the following format:
```json
{
    "answer": "entailed" or "refuted"
}
```
rule
["refuted"]