user
Instruction
This is a table fact verification task. The goal of this task is to distinguish whether the given statement is entailed or refuted by the given table.


Table
Table Title: ai miyazato
Table Content:
| no | date | tournament | winning score | to par | margin of victory | runner (s) - up |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 28 sep 2003 | miyagi tv cup dunlop ladies open (as an amateur ) | 70 + 70 + 71 = 211 | - 5 | 1 stroke | mari katayama hiroko yamaguchi |
| 2 | 7 mar 2004 | daikin orchid ladies | 70 + 66 + 70 = 206 | - 10 | 3 strokes | kaori higo |
| 3 | 13 jun 2004 | suntory ladies open | 69 + 70 + 70 + 68 = 277 | - 11 | 6 strokes | hiroko yamaguchi toshimi kimura |
| 4 | 20 jun 2004 | apita circle k sunkus ladies | 69 + 69 + 72 = 210 | - 6 | 1 stroke | yuri fudoh |
| 5 | 24 oct 2004 | masters gc ladies | 69 + 68 + 68 = 205 | - 11 | 1 stroke | miho koga |
| 6 | 21 nov 2004 | daio paper elleair ladies open | 66 + 67 + 69 = 202 | - 14 | 3 strokes | chieko amanuma rui kitada |
| 7 | 15 may 2005 | vernal ladies | 69 + 64 + 70 = 203 | - 13 | 8 strokes | akiko fukushima |
| 8 | 22 may 2005 | chukyo tv bridgestone ladies open | 65 + 74 + 70 = 209 | - 7 | playoff | nikki campbell |
| 9 | 21 aug 2005 | new catapillar mitsubishi ladies | 66 + 75 + 68 = 209 | - 10 | 3 strokes | mi - jeong jeon hiromi mogi |
| 10 | 2 oct 2005 | japan women 's open golf championship | 69 + 69 + 72 + 73 = 283 | - 5 | 5 strokes | akiko fukushima |
| 12 | 20 nov 2005 | daio paper elleair ladies open | 69 + 70 + 65 = 204 | - 12 | 5 strokes | shiho oyama woo - soon ko kasumi fujii |
| 13 | 10 sep 2006 | jlpga championship konica minolta cup | 70 + 68 + 74 + 70 = 282 | - 6 | 3 strokes | hyun - ju shin |
| 14 | 24 sep 2006 | miyagi tv cup dunlop ladies open | 70 + 73 + 71 = 214 | - 2 | 3 strokes | shiho oyama |


Statement
the win score of the vernal ladies tournament be 203


Answer Format
The final answer should be either "entailed" or "refuted" and use the following format:
```json
{
    "answer": "entailed" or "refuted"
}
```
rule
["entailed"]