user
Instruction
This is a table fact verification task. The goal of this task is to distinguish whether the given statement is entailed or refuted by the given table.


Table
Table Title: win (tv station)
Table Content:
| region served | ch 1 | on - air date | analogue power | digital power | analogue haat | digital haat | transmitter location |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| canberra | 31 ( uhf ) | 31 march 1989 | 600 kw | 50 kw | 362 m | 362 m | black mountain |
| central tablelands | 39 ( uhf ) | 30 december 1989 | 2000 kw | 570 kw | 627 m | 628 m | mount canobolas |
| central western slopes | 32 ( uhf ) | 30 december 1989 | 1000 kw | 600 kw | 648 m | 653 m | mount cenn cruaich |
| illawarra & regional sydney | 59 ( uhf ) | 18 march 1962 | 950 kw | 250 kw | 505 m | 600 m | knights hill |
| south western slopes and eastern riverina | 32 ( uhf ) | 30 december 1989 | 1600 kw | 600 kw | 525 m | 540 m | mount ulandra |


Statement
in central tableland , ch 1 be 39 (uhf)


Answer Format
The final answer should be either "entailed" or "refuted" and use the following format:
```json
{
    "answer": "entailed" or "refuted"
}
```
rule
["entailed"]