user
Instruction
This is a table fact verification task. The goal of this task is to distinguish whether the given statement is entailed or refuted by the given table.


Table
Table Title: outback (region)
Table Content:
| local government area | type | major town | land area (km square) | pop 2006 | density km 2 | towns | est |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| roxby downs | municipal council | roxby downs | 110 | 4292 | 39018 | 2 | 1982 |
| coober pedy | district council | coober pedy | 77 , 8 | 1996 | 25656 | 1 | 1987 |
| anangu pitjantjatjara yankunytjatjara | aboriginal council | umuwa | 102650 | 2204 | 21 | 18 | 1981 |
| maralinga tjarutja 1) | aboriginal council | oak valley | 102863 , 6 | 105 | 1 | 1 | 1984 |
| yalata | aboriginal council | yalata | 4563 | 100 | 22 | 1 | 1994 |
| nepabunna | aboriginal council | nepabunna , south australia | 76 , 4 | 49 | 641 | 1 | 1998 |
| outback areas community development trust | unincorporated area | leigh creek | 624339.0 | 3750 | 6 | 36 | 1978 |


Statement
in 2006 the population of the local government where coober pedy be locate be 4292


Answer Format
The final answer should be either "entailed" or "refuted" and use the following format:
```json
{
    "answer": "entailed" or "refuted"
}
```
rule
["refuted"]