user
Instruction
This is a table fact verification task. The goal of this task is to distinguish whether the given statement is entailed or refuted by the given table.


Table
Table Title: 3rd new zealand parliament
Table Content:
| member | electorate | province | mps term | election date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| alfred creyke | avon | canterbury | first | 1 1861 |
| frederick weld | cheviot | canterbury | third | 1 1861 |
| andrew richmond | collingwood | nelson | first | 4 1861 |
| isaac cookson | kaiapoi | canterbury | second | 7 1861 |
| herbert curtis | motueka | nelson | second | 5 1861 |
| william fox | rangitiki | wellington | second | 4 1861 |
| alfred saunders | waimea | marlborough | first | 1 1861 |


Statement
nelson be not the province for the electorate of collingwood


Answer Format
The final answer should be either "entailed" or "refuted" and use the following format:
```json
{
    "answer": "entailed" or "refuted"
}
```
rule
["refuted"]