user
Instruction
This is a table fact verification task. The goal of this task is to distinguish whether the given statement is entailed or refuted by the given table.


Table
Table Title: none
Table Content:
| departure | going to | calling at | arrival | operator |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 07.10 | skegness | wainfleet , skegness | 7.28 | gnr |
| 08.47 | spilsby | halton holegate , spilsby | 9.01 | gnr |
| 10.25 | peterborough north | boston , spalding , peterborough north | 11.33 | gnr |
| 10.28 | spilsby | halton holegate , spilsby | 10.39 | gnr |
| 11.02 | mablethorpe | willoughby , mumby road , sutton - on - sea , mablethorpe | 11.32 | gnr |
| 11.15 | spilsby | halton holegate , spilsby | 11.3 | gnr |
| 11.37 (mon) | skegness | skegness | 11.52 | gnr |
| 11.49 | mablethorpe | willoughby , mumby road , sutton - on - sea , mablethorpe | 12.2 | gnr |
| 11.53 | skegness | skegness | 12.08 | gnr |
| 12.40 | boston | boston | 13.0 | gnr |
| 13.10 | spilsby | halton holegate , spilsby | 13.21 | gnr |
| 16.15 | spilsby | halton holegate , spilsby | 16.29 | gnr |
| 17.03 | nottingham victoria | boston , sleaford , nottingham victoria | 18.46 | gnr |
| 18.16 | spilsby | halton holegate , spilsby | 18.27 | gnr |
| 19.07 | grimsby town | willoughby , alford , louth , waltham , grimsby town | 20.0 | gnr |
| 19.15 (fri) | skegness | skegness | 19.3 | gnr |
| 19.15 (fri) | mablethorpe | willoughby , mumby road , sutton - on - sea , mablethorpe | 19.5 | gnr |
| 19.23 | spilsby | halton holegate , spilsby | 19.34 | gnr |
| 21.00 | grimsby town | alford , louth , waltham , grimsby town | 21.53 | gnr |
| 21.06 | peterborough north | boston , spalding , peterborough north | 22.23 | gnr |
| 21.08 | skegness | wainfleet , skegness | 21.26 | gnr |


Statement
the train operator of the train that depart on monday at 11:02 be fgw


Answer Format
The final answer should be either "entailed" or "refuted" and use the following format:
```json
{
    "answer": "entailed" or "refuted"
}
```
rule
["refuted"]