user
Instruction
This is a table fact verification task. The goal of this task is to distinguish whether the given statement is entailed or refuted by the given table.


Table
Table Title: 2004 texas rangers season
Table Content:
| date | opponent | score | loss | attendance |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| june 1 | indians | 6 - 5 | white (2 - 1) | 17136 |
| june 2 | indians | 5 - 3 | betancourt (2 - 4) | 18098 |
| june 4 | yankees | 7 - 6 | powell (1 - 1) | 49372 |
| june 5 | yankees | 8 - 1 | lieber (4 - 3) | 51910 |
| june 6 | yankees | 2 - 1 | drese (2 - 3) | 54092 |
| june 7 | pirates | 6 - 5 | johnston (0 - 3) | 25286 |
| june 8 | postponed | postponed | postponed | postponed |
| june 9 | postponed | postponed | postponed | postponed |
| june 10 | pirates | 9 - 7 | meadows (2 - 2) | n / a |
| june 10 | pirates | 10 - 4 | fogg (3 - 5) | 27219 |
| june 11 | cardinals | 12 - 7 | dominguez (1 - 2) | 32962 |
| june 12 | cardinals | 7 - 2 | carpenter (7 - 2) | 42173 |
| june 13 | cardinals | 3 - 2 | dickey (4 - 6) | 41087 |
| june 15 | reds | 5 - 4 | ramirez (3 - 3) | 36501 |
| june 16 | reds | 7 - 4 | francisco (1 - 1) | 39114 |
| june 17 | reds | 4 - 3 | drese (3 - 4) | 40383 |
| june 18 | marlins | 8 - 1 | penny (6 - 5) | 20506 |
| june 19 | marlins | 7 - 6 | willis (6 - 4) | 31021 |
| june 20 | marlins | 4 - 2 | koch (0 - 1) | 23643 |
| june 22 | mariners | 10 - 2 | nageotte (1 - 3) | 32364 |
| june 23 | mariners | 6 - 3 | franklin (3 - 5) | 30418 |
| june 24 | mariners | 9 - 7 | moyer (6 - 3) | 26266 |
| june 25 | astros | 3 - 1 | miller (7 - 7) | 46088 |
| june 26 | astros | 8 - 7 | miceli (3 - 3) | 40131 |
| june 27 | astros | 1 - 0 | drese (4 - 5) | 43328 |
| june 28 | mariners | 8 - 5 | franklin (3 - 6) | 28253 |
| june 29 | mariners | 4 - 3 | benoit (2 - 3) | 34844 |
| june 30 | mariners | 9 - 6 | nageotte (1 - 4) | 32754 |


Statement
in the 2004 texas ranger season on only 1 occasion do both side fail to score


Answer Format
The final answer should be either "entailed" or "refuted" and use the following format:
```json
{
    "answer": "entailed" or "refuted"
}
```
rule
["entailed"]