user
Instruction
This is a table fact verification task. The goal of this task is to distinguish whether the given statement is entailed or refuted by the given table.


Table
Table Title: 1990 - 91 fa cup
Table Content:
| tie no | home team | score | away team | date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | liverpool | 2 - 2 | brighton & hove albion | 26 / 01 / 1991 |
| replay | brighton & hove albion | 2 - 3 | liverpool | 30 / 01 / 1991 |
| 2 | notts county | 2 - 0 | oldham athletic | 26 / 01 / 1991 |
| 3 | crewe alexandra | 1 - 0 | rotherham united | 26 / 01 / 1991 |
| 4 | luton town | 1 - 1 | west ham united | 26 / 01 / 1991 |
| replay | west ham united | 5 - 0 | luton town | 30 / 01 / 1991 |
| 5 | woking | 0 - 1 | everton | 27 / 01 / 1991 |
| 6 | shrewsbury town | 1 - 0 | wimbledon | 26 / 01 / 1991 |
| 7 | newcastle united | 2 - 2 | nottingham forest | 13 / 02 / 1991 |
| replay | nottingham forest | 3 - 0 | newcastle united | 18 / 02 / 1991 |
| 8 | tottenham hotspur | 4 - 2 | oxford united | 26 / 01 / 1991 |
| 9 | coventry city | 1 - 1 | southampton | 26 / 01 / 1991 |
| replay | southampton | 2 - 0 | coventry city | 29 / 01 / 1991 |
| 10 | portsmouth | 5 - 1 | bournemouth | 26 / 01 / 1991 |
| 11 | manchester united | 1 - 0 | bolton wanderers | 26 / 01 / 1991 |
| 12 | norwich city | 3 - 1 | swindon town | 26 / 01 / 1991 |
| 13 | millwall | 4 - 4 | sheffield wednesday | 26 / 01 / 1991 |
| replay | sheffield wednesday | 2 - 0 | millwall | 30 / 01 / 1991 |
| 14 | port vale | 1 - 2 | manchester city | 26 / 01 / 1991 |
| 15 | arsenal | 0 - 0 | leeds united | 27 / 01 / 1991 |
| replay | leeds united | 1 - 1 | arsenal | 30 / 01 / 1991 |
| replay | arsenal | 0 - 0 | leeds united | 13 / 02 / 1991 |
| replay | leeds united | 1 - 2 | arsenal | 16 / 02 / 1991 |
| 16 | cambridge united | 2 - 0 | middlesbrough | 26 / 01 / 1991 |


Statement
5 be the tie no before the away team be woking


Answer Format
The final answer should be either "entailed" or "refuted" and use the following format:
```json
{
    "answer": "entailed" or "refuted"
}
```
rule
["refuted"]