user
Instruction
This is a table fact verification task. The goal of this task is to distinguish whether the given statement is entailed or refuted by the given table.


Table
Table Title: wind power in india
Table Content:
| power plant | producer | location | state | total capacity (mwe) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| vankusawade wind park | suzlon energy ltd | satara district | maharashtra | 259.0 |
| cape comorin | aban loyd chiles offshore ltd | kanyakumari | tamil nadu | 33.0 |
| kayathar subhash | subhash ltd | kayathar | tamil nadu | 30.0 |
| ramakkalmedu | subhash ltd | ramakkalmedu | kerala | 25.0 |
| muppandal wind | muppandal wind farm | muppandal | tamil nadu | 22.0 |
| gudimangalam | gudimangalam wind farm | gudimangalam | tamil nadu | 21.0 |
| puthlur rci | wescare (india) ltd | puthlur | andhra pradesh | 20.0 |
| lamda danida | danida india ltd | lamba | gujarat | 15.0 |
| chennai mohan | mohan breweries & distilleries ltd | chennai | tamil nadu | 15.0 |
| jamgudrani mp | mp windfarms ltd | dewas | madhya pradesh | 14.0 |
| jogmatti bses | bses ltd | chitradurga district | karnataka | 14.0 |
| perungudi newam | newam power company ltd | perungudi | tamil nadu | 12.0 |
| kethanur wind farm | kethanur wind farm | kethanur | tamil nadu | 11.0 |
| hyderabad apsrtc | andhra pradesh state road transport corporation | hyderabad | andhra pradesh | 10.0 |
| muppandal madras | madras cements ltd | muppandal | tamil nadu | 10.0 |
| shah gajendragarh | mmtcl | gadag | karnataka | 15.0 |
| shah gajendragarh | sanjay d ghodawat | gadag | karnataka | 10.8 |
| acciona tuppadahalli | tuppadahalli energy india private limited | chitradurga district | karnataka | 56.1 |
| poolavadi chettinad | chettinad cement corp ltd | poolavadi | tamil nadu | 10.0 |
| shalivahana wind | shalivahana green energy ltd | tirupur | tamil nadu | 20.4 |
| dangiri wind farm | oil india ltd | jaiselmer | rajasthan | 54.0 |


Statement
mmtcl be the company know as the producer at the kethanur location


Answer Format
The final answer should be either "entailed" or "refuted" and use the following format:
```json
{
    "answer": "entailed" or "refuted"
}
```
rule
["refuted"]