Split (2)

train · 5.42k rows

messages listlengths 3 3
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Everywhere we go we see everyone's face and facial expressions. They could either be good or bad. But what if you had a computer to tell what emotion they were going through if you did not know?\n\nProf. Thomas Huang and his partner have created an algorithm to depict what emotion a person is having. This technology is very valuable because we have never seen something like this before, it can even read emotions on a persons face from a painting. It uses all 44 major muscles in your face and depending on what muscles a person is using, they can depict what emotion you are going through. For example the author states in paragraph 3 that, \"your frontalis pars lateralis muscle (above your eyes) raises your eyebrow when you're surprised; your orbicularis ori (around your mouth) tightens your lips to show anger\".\n\nIn conclusion, this technology could end up being the next big thing just because of the simple fact that it is very new and could be used later on as part of something bigger. This technology could even end up changing how we think as humans and the way the world works today.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "You think technology can read emotional face expretion?\n\nYes I think because the new technology are very avanced, cameras have many fuctions and are very smart for take of pictures, the new cell phones have this technology one example is Iphone 7 or Galaxy 8 this smartphones have many technology, they know when are you sad or happy they have a special camera.\n\nThe news computers have many technology they are the best for this work because you can modify of system , you can put one camera and stard to work, you need create of program for analized of expretions and you can suporting with other student .\n\nOne need put of front to the camera and other need take picture and analized in computer, the next step is analized the facial expretions and see the muscles his face, eyes, cheeks or his smile the computer need analized the information and procces.\n\nFirst student have a natural smile and computer detected this, he is happy, next student are crying, computer analized he is sad. but when student have pockarface the computer no detected nothing because no have any emotions, but what happen when one student make falce smile, but this is really good, I think of the computer detected he is happy.\n\nI think of people need make manny technology because actual computers can be trick.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear Senator of Florida,\n\nI belive the electoral college should be abolished as a process over all. The electoral college should be abolished because it does not benefit the U.S. in anyway and has caused multiple problems in elections over the past years. The electoral college should not be a part of the U.S. Constitution and it only causes issues while elections are present therefore we as a country should elect by popular vote.\n\nThe electoral college should be abloshied because it has caused multiple problems over the past years during elections and could continue to cause problems. The electoral college process consists of selecting electors, as you know, but those electors do not always vote for their partie's candidates like they should. This process causes the popular vote to not always guarantee pesidency to a certain candidate even if they have the popular vote. In 2000 Al Gore had won the popular vote but lost presidency because of the electoral college. Not only did one inncident occur but multiple occur because of the electoral college. As stated in paragraph 11 of Bradford Plumer's article, in 1960 segregationists in Louisiana's legislature almost succeeded in replacing Democratic electors with new electors who opposed John F. Kennedy so if Kennedy got the popular vote he wouldnt have got the presidency. Like Bradford Plumer clearly stated \"the electoral college is unfair outdated and irrational.\" The electoral college should be abolished so that problems can be eliminated and elections are fair.\n\nThe electoral college should not only be abolished, or destroyed, because it causes problems but also because it does not benefit the United States in any way. The outdated, unfair system just hurts the U.S. government and the country as a whole, it does not benefit our government or citizens in anyway what so ever. Under the electoral college system voters are voting for a slate of electors who don't always vote for their own party candidate rather than voting for the candidate they want to govern our country. 60% of voters would prefer direct election and popular vote anyway so why not throw out the old worn down process that dosent work and replace it with something the people of this country actually want, popular vote. Some people might say we should keep the electoral college because each party selects a slate of electors trusted to vote for the party's nominee so nothing can happen but according to history things can happen such as in the 2000 election. Why keep a process that the majority of the citizens of this country don't want and a process that just causes issues.\n\nThe electoral college is a thing of the past, a has been that almost no one wants around. Popular vote elections would be more fair and will not have mistakes during elections like the huge mistakes the electoral college system has proven to display. The citizens of America want the electoral college gone and popular vote elections should be what the government is aiming for so we do not have mistakes in our elections and so the U.S. can benefit from actually having a working election process. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Why should we have to use technology to tell peoples emotions. In the case of Mona Lisa i can see why they would use it there. It states that she`s 83 percent happy, 9 percent disgusted, 6 percent fearful, and 2 percent angry. I wouldn`t have known that if not for tech. Why should we calculate emotions. We shouldn`t have to use 3-D computor model to tell the emotions of people. All we have to do is look in a mirror. Raise your lips at the corners of your mouth. Then squint your eyes slightly, to produce wrinkling (crows feet) at the corners of your eyes. Holding that, raise the outer parts of your cheeks up, towards your eyes. Using technology produces a fake smile. We want real smiles. Besides your home PC can`t handle the complex algorithms used to decode a smile. But we can write down some simple instuctions that encode different emotions. So all i just said is basicly saying i don`t want this to be used. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Using driverless cars is not a good idea because cars are already dangerous as it is. To being using driverless cars as a form of transportation would be like trusting a machine with one's life. The pros of driverless cars are many, but the cons are just as plentiful. Driverless cars \"would fundamentally change the world,\" however, they could just as easily ruin it (1).\n\nDriverless cars are helpful because they do most of what true drivers hate to do. They drive. Such cars have the ability to \"handle driving functions at speeds up to 25 mph\" (7). The cars are also able to steer, accelerate, and stop. Driverless cars would \"offer far more felxibility\" and \"use half the fuel of today's taxis\" (1). Driverless cars can even drive several miles without any issues, but there is a lot that the cars cannot do on their own. The cars are not even completely driverless. A driver would jump for joy at the thought of a car that supposedly drives itself because that would mean relaxation for the driver, but is it truly all that relaxing?\n\nDriverless cars can \"steer, accelerate, and brake themselves\" but they still require human skills. A driverless car would not actually mean no driving because the whole time a person is being driven, he or she must have his or her hands on the wheel. There are \"special touch sensors\" that \"make sure the driver keeps hold of the wheel\" (7). Driverless cars must not mean texting and driving becomes legal after all. Humans must stay alert while in driverless cars because accidents can still happen. The cars cannot navigate through construction sites or around accidents. Another issue with driverless cars is that they cannot pull in or out of driveways. Pulling out of a driveway or lot is typically the first action that a driver takes, and pulling in is typically the last action that a driver takes. If the trip has to start and end with the driver, what is the point of stopping just for the duration of the drive? \"Why would anyone want a driverless car that still needs a driver\" (8)?\n\nDriving laws focus on keeping people in, or around, cars safe, but \"safety is best achieved with alert drivers.\" The idea of driverless cars will automatically have drivers imagining everything that they could get done if they do not have to worry about operating the vehicle. There are sensors in driverless cars, but sensors will not stop people from doing what they want to do. Current driving laws do not even prevent people from doing what they want to do. If people cannot prevent accidents from happening, a machine will not be able to prevent accidents from happening.\n\nDriverless cars can only be used once drivers learn how to operate cars. Cars are already not safe because of manufacturing errors and operator errors, so it is not smart to put the entire responsibility on a machine. When an accident occurs, \"who is at fault--the driver or the manufacturer\" (9)? The blame cannot be put on the car, but can it be put on the operator? ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "What is the point? Where is the fun in driverless cars? My posititon on driverless cars is that I am against them. 1 reason is because driverless cars may not always be safe. Not all driverless cars are tested before they are sold and used, so there is no guarantee of them being safe.\n\nDriverless cars also take peoples jobs away. If they were to start making taxis driverless that would mean so many people would be out of a job. The same goes for buses. And no one will buy cars because no one will need them so that means some car production companies will be shut down also.\n\nDriverless cars may seem like a good idea to some but in reality they will cost more money than your average car. You will probably spend hundreds of thousands on 1 driverless car that could have bought you 2 average, in shape cars. Technology is evolving everyday this is what makes us think that we have to have all the nice new cars, phones, tablets, etc. but we are fine with the things that we have.\n\nSome driverless cars aren't even completely driverless, human hands still have to touch the wheel, back up, and many other things. Instead of calling it driverless, it should be called assistance. Driverless cars take the joy out of drving, new drivers will not know how to work a car other than the driverless kind, and may not have the skills to drive a regular car. People will get so used to driving driverless that they may forget how to drive for themselves.\n\nMy position on driverless cars is the same after reading the article. They are sometimes not safe, they will cost a lot of money and they take the fun out of driving. Driverless cars take years to test and make by that time plenty of beautiful cars will have came out and we would have forgot about driverless cars. I am against driverless cars. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Most driving laws focus on keeping drovers passengers and pedestrians safe and lawmakers know that safety is best achieved with alet drivers presently traffic laws are written with the assumpiton that the only safe car has a human drivers in control at all times\n\nas result in most states it is illegal even to the best computer driven cars.\n\nCalifornia nevada florida and the district of columbia have led the country in allowing limited use of semi autonomous carsw manufactures belive tthat more states will follows as soon as the cars are proved more reliably safe.\n\nAutomakers are continuing their work on the assumpiton that the problems ahead will be solved tesla has projected a release for a car\n\ncapable of driving on autopilot\n\npercenty of the time mercedes benz audi and nissan plan to have cars that can drive themselves by the road to the truly autonomus car strectechs on ahead of us but we grow closer to the destination every day. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "MONTH_DAY_YEAR\n\nGoodmoring senator before I start , I would like to ask how are you doing and how's your family. I hope everybody health is great and family problems. Today I want to talk to you about some little problem that's not going as well as I thought it was going to go. Electoral College is not a good idea for us citizens. Because everybody in this country that works and come from another country , should be able to vote for their President. The Electoral College consists of 583 electors. A majority of 270 electoral vote is required to elect the President.\n\nThe presidential election is held every four years on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. Us citizens think that's a better idea. Don't you think? The presidential election most have a \"winner-take-all\" system that awards all electors to the winning presidental candidate. And after the presidential election, yout governor prepares a \"Certificate of Ascertainment\". Listing all of the candidates who ran for President in your state along with the names of their respective electors. The electors are generally chosen by the candidate's political party.\n\nAccording to Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter, Bob Dole they agreed on abolishing the electoral college . The electoral college won the popular vote but lost the presidency over 60% of voters. What that means? 60% of the people didn't agree with the electoral college. The single best argument against the electoral college is what they might call the disaster factor. Us the American people should consider themselves lucky that the 2000 fiasco was the biggest election crisis in a century. The state legislatures are technically responsible for picking electors , and that those electors could always defy the will of the people.\n\nAt the most basic level, the electoral college is unfair to voters. Because of the winner-take-all system in each states they know they have no chance of winning , focosing only on the tight races on the \"swing\" states. During the 2000 compaign seventeen states did not see the canditates at all. Including Rhode Island and South Carolina. Also voters in 25 of the lqrgest media markets didn't get to see a single campaign ad. The electoral college is unfair, outdated , and irrational. The best arguments in favor of it are mostly assertionw without much basis in reality. Bob Dole was right. Abolish the elctoral college!\n\nIn conclusion, The Electoral College is widely regarded as an anachronism , a non-democratic method of selecting a president that ought to be overruled by declaring the candidate who receives the most popular votes the winner. There are five reasons for retaining the Electoral College despite its lack of democratic pedigtee; all are practical reasons, not liberal or conservative reasons. This is all I wanted to tell you , I hope you listen to what I'm trying to tell you. I know I am not the only one that thinks like this. If you would like to contact me back you could email me at EMAIL_ADDRESS. Thankyou and have a great day!\n\nPROPER_NAME ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Facial Action Coding System knows whether or not a painting is happy or sad. Prof. Thomas Huang of Illinois and Prof. Nicu Sebe of Amsterdam collaborated to create this new facial recognition software. Their goals for this product are to improve the communication between computers and people. The FACS could prove to be immensly valuable in the rapidly developing world of technology in order to interpret student emotions to maximise their learning experiences.\n\nThe Facial Action Coding System has endless possibilites of improvement that will help it to accurately interpret peoples' emotions. By cross-referencing muscle movements on the face with an emotionless face, it is able to determine what percent of happy, surprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sad the subject is. Even though individuals often show vary slight changes in expression, the FACS is able to detect these changes in emotions. Through some improvement and many algorithms, FACS could be available to a classroom setting to improve the education experience.\n\nThe Facial Action Coding System would be extremely valuable in the classroom setting to both teachers and students. In the middle of a lesson, FACS could scan the students faces to see which are confused and not understanding the topic or which students are just bored by it. This would help the teachers to gauge whether they need to get help for the confused student or add a fun activity to regain the interest of the bored students. FACS would be able to personally develop and improve lessons from one student to the next. It would maximise the learning of each pupil and could alter lessons to fit each student individually. The Facial Action Coding System would prove to be extemely valuable in the classroom setting to not only the students, but the teachers as well.\n\nFACS can also improve the experience on any electronic device by improvign ads and even videos. This new and improved technology could scan your face when an ad pops up, and depending on your reaction, it could calibrate what type of ads are fit to interest the viewer. If you reactions was positive and that ad attracted your attention, I would suggest similar ads, but if you frown or react negatively, then it would not display ads with that same subject. This technology can also help to improve the reactions and expressions of computer-animated faces. This would be helpful for people who enjoy video games or animated movies, and it would also help to improve video surgeries which would prove extermely valuable. With help from FACS, ad preferences, animated movies, videogames, and even video surgery could benefit.\n\nThe Facial Action Coding System would be extremely valuable in today's technological world. There are many benefits that have never been available before to using this new technology. It could personalize and adjust the learning experience to fit any student or teacher just be recognizing their emotions. FACS would be be beneficial in the rapidly expanding electronic world for animated character expressions, ad personalization, and video surgeries. The Facial Action Coding System could prove to be endlessly valuable as it helps improve students' learning experiences both in and out of the classroom.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The idea of driverless cars is extraordinary and could be a great plan and a great source of entertainment. Who would not want a car that drives by itself? The idea is great but it could potentially bring a lot of bad baggage along with it. The world does not need driverless cars because it is unsafe, defeats the purpose of driving, and is a waste of money.\n\nDriverless cars are very unsafe. In the article it talks about all the things they can do, for example, it can steer, accelerate, and brake all by itself! Somehow, someway this is possible, but is it consistent is the question? Throughout the article they talked about tests they did and the results that came with the tests. While describing them the author used phrases like, \"It worked well.\" Only one paragraph in the article they were 'for sure' that it worked. For someone to drive such a car they should have specific clarification that they would be safe while inside this vehicle, and they can trust that they have no worries and that this car will do 80% of the work for them. Also, if the car does most of the work for you, then what is the point of having a car?\n\nDriverless cars defeat the purpose of even having a car. All of the processes you go through as a teenager with getting your permit or license is diminished, and in a sense you did all that work for nothing. The point of driving is having a quicker way of getting to the places you need to be instead of walking, biking, etc. In paragraph 10 it says that an automaking company named 'Tesla' is making a car that can be on autopilot 90 percent of the time. Ask youself, why would you waste your time on getting a car like that when you can ride the bus, train, limo, or taxi that would do 100 percent of the driving for you? That would just make me feel like I'm wasting my money on senseless things.\n\nDriverless cars are also a waste of money. Automakers spend millions, maybe even billions of dollars making prototypes of these cars and testing them. Every time one of the test cars do not work they have to go and make a new one which is money that could be used for something a lot more efficient. The automakers to this day are still doing this, which is throwing money out the window. But not just the automakers are wasting their time and money, if people were to get this car they would be wasting their time and money also. People would waste thousands of dollar on one car that is pointless. Rich or poor this would be a senseless investment, because there are cheaper ways to get where you need to go. Taxi's, limos, buses, and trains are all great affordable ways of transportation. The automakers could find something that is a lot better and cheaper that could change the world.\n\nDriverless cars is again a wonderful, awesome idea. It would definetly have a lot of popularity and publicity but is it really worth it in the long run? The automakers can find a lot of things that could change the world, and this is something the world does not need. The world should not have driverless cars because it is unsafe, defeats the purpose of driving, and is a waste of money. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I could convince someone by telling them all planets have something diffrent that others dont have like planets with rings or asteroid belts or the planet with the giant storm that has lasted years and pluto which isnt even considered a planet anymore. It couldn`t have been created by aliens , if it was scientists would have found an explantion about why they created it instead of just being a natural planet landform which it is.it also says in paragraph #7 that on a JPL website that there was no alien monument after all and it was just a natural landform and peopl were just arguing with the fact because they want a better story than it is just a natural land mark so it convinced MIssion Controllers to look again which thay say is not an easy target but hard work.The paragrapgh even says that multiple\n\npeople like newscasters and even the internet says that\n\nits just a martian mesa.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "To me the object does look like a face. But to me it also looks like a bunch of rocks put together and the about to break apart. Also the face is a natural landform that probably was built by water and and dirt. That formed over the year and got so hard that now its starting to crack and form a object that looks like a face.\n\nIn the article it says \"twenty five years ago something funny happened around Mars\". So that makes me think that rocks or dirt builded up and now starting the crack. On Mars there' s a bunch of rock and dirt. But also the article said \"A few days later NASA unveiled the image for all to see\". \"The caption noted a \"huge rock formatoin which resembles a human head\".\n\nMy conclusion is that somebody will find out what it is. But also find out the cause of it and what harm can it do. Not only that but whatg do it stand for and why is it just now happening after all these years that has passed by. But this is my conclusion for this article here today. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I am strongly against having the technology of driveless cars just for the reasonable fact that it is very hazardous and you will not learn the skill to have fun and driving on your own. Also it isn't a good aspect upon life because we as people want to feel 100% safe, and to trust technology is not a good idea. What will happen if the car disfunctions and dosen't stop on time in an accident?\n\nAs it states in the article, \"why would anyone want a driveless car and still need a driver,\" because the manufactures of this driveless car company knows that it is not a 100% guarantee that the car will stop on time or keep you save from accidents. Even though it wouldn't be one as of driving on your own, because you can't help the faults of other drivers on the road, there still would be more accidents with a driveless car than it would be on our own, because you have full control of what you want to do with it. And this where the big question falls in, \"If technology fails and someone is injured who fault is it the driver or the manufactuer?\" It would be the maunfactuers because they say even with a driveless car the human driver must remain alert and be ready to take over when the situation rquires for them to get into an accident.\n\nEven if the google car announces for them to be prepared and when to take action, don't you think instead it should prepare itself to disregard getting into an accident. Before they even though about selling these cars and having people ride in them, they should've did a better investment and more use of technological differences to actually help citizens out. They could've even had the installation for the car to teach student learners how to drive with a person to test them in the car, because this technology of a driveless car is just not good enough. The manufactures also didn't even have a thought to actually care for other citizens out there driving the car because if they did they would've had to car do everything needed to precaution itself from hazardous situations.\n\nIn conclusion, this is why i strongly disagree for the manufacturing of driveless cars because it could tend to be very hazardous and it's not good to belive in technology will save you. Also if it's a driveless car why should you still have to have somebody in the car and have them still steer and take over in dangerous situations? Just think, who are you to blame for getting into that one accident, will the company pay for your damages and utilities you have to handle on the car? It's not worth spending thousands of dollars on a unreliable investment. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Seagoing Cowboy\n\nHave you ever thought about being a Seagoing Cowboy. If you haven't maybe you should. As a Seagoing Cowboy you can help people, animals, and more. Seagoing Cowboys you travel a lot. you travel to places like China, Greece, Europe, and even Venice,Italy. You also take care of animals while shipping. You can feed them and bathe them. There is also lots of sight seeing you get to tour places like excavated castles the Panama canal and more.\n\nIn paragraph six Luke had to travel across the Atlantic Ocean for two weeks. He fed and watered the animals two or three times a day. He also had to clean the stalls. He was kept busy on that ship. He was used to being worked all of the tim on his aunt Katie's farm.\n\nIn conclusion I think that being a Seagoing Cowboy is sometimes dangerous, but fun most of the time. The Seagoing Cowboy program is fun you should try it. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Life at Sea\n\nIn my point of view this is a once in a lifetime opportunity for anyone back in 1945. His friend made a huge part of him going into Seagoing Cowboys. Growing up said he had two jobs so that mae it perfect for it beacause he ahd the expirence of working hard. He also helping his Aunt Kate's farm helped him get used to working hard for something. Luke and his friend Don was planing on doing this together. Don invited him to go to Europe on a cattle boat, before he probaly wouldnt even had done it. Luke literaly almost died because he almost fell off board. Maybe if Don didnt tell him maybe he wouldnt never almost died on the cattle ship.\n\nLuke said it was an adventure , it opened up a new world for him, he said ,\" I am grateful for his opportinity,\" he says,\" It made we aware of other people of other coutries and thier needs.\" he said he was grateful for it he didnt think of it as just doing it because you have to he wanted to do, he saiid once in a lifetime oppuntity, he wanted to he wasn't pushed his choice. In Luke's point of view that was probaly the best choice of his life.\n\nPeople sould do this because it could change ou for the better and worst. You would help people who need it. If you like animals you would be around animals all the time . You would notice he good an d bad thing in othe rcountries. Please sign up for this so you can help and serve your own country . Everything and everyone needs help around the world . So help,serve, and e helpful so other people could be happy", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Having technology that can read your emotion it's okay and it can help people that don't have friends or don't have any body to talk to. If you need someone to talk to but you don't have anybody, than technology can help you with that problem. If the technology/computer can see your emotion than it can tell what's wrong with you and give you some answer's to you're problems in life. In the same time you should be carefull, because technology can maybe turn back on you and will want you to do something bad that never crossed your mind. If tecchnology is able to read your emotions it's okay but we should also be careful. In the same time that type of technology that is able to read your emotion it's amazing but power full too; because if you are trying to hide something from it, it can tell that you are lying to the computer and also that tecchnology can take peoples jobs. People in the world need their jobs for they can take care of the family.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Electoral College has been kept for centuries, established by the founding fathers and established in the Constitution. I think that the process should be maintained; so far, it has worked fine and I do not see any reason to rid of it. The Electoral College should be continued in use because there are at least five main scenarios in which it is helpful and reasonable.\n\nIn ways, the Electoral College could be dangerous to use unless you have electors that are completely faithful in their party, and do not take advantage of getting to choose where to place their vote. Basically, voters are voting for a slate of electors, who then elect the president. These electors can go against the people's majority votes and decide who to vote for. It could also be possible that a state sends two slates of electors to elect. If the election was a direct vote, there would be almost no chance for a tie to happen, but with the Electoral College, there is always that possiblity. Some states do not even see the candidates because of the majority of the people living there belong to a single party, and the \"winner-takes-all\" system completely affects this. If the elcetion were to be a direct vote, the candidates might visit the states in order to gather as many votes as possible. However, many of these reasons that the Electoral Collge should be abolished are just one time things, so consider the other side of the argument.\n\nSwing states basically decide the election and therefore, they are the most thoughtful voters. They know that they will be the ones to decide the election, so they pay more attention to the news, and the candidates' campaigns. The swing states receive the most information and attention from the candidates. Since they will end up deciding, the candidates want them on their side. Many sates are already pedicted, even before the election, as a majority of them are from one party. These voters think the most about who they want to run our country and who will do the best in that position, so they should be granted the honor of making the decision.\n\nElectoral votes help avoid run-off elections, by reducing the pressure that might complicate the election. Say that our government referred to the direct vote system, with a lesser system known as the Electoral College was for comparison, and during the presidential election, there happened to be a problem with the popular votes versus the Electoral College; this complication could be avoided if we used the Electoral College. This has happened with nixon in 1968 and Clinton in 1992, when they both had only a 43 plurality of the popular votes but were winning in the Electoral College.\n\nThe Electoral College could be unwanted by many minority voters in states that leaned completely one way. These voters hardly pay attention during the campaign because they know that their vote will hardly make a diffference in their state, but a voter's vote could not swing a complete election, and not the full population voted in the 2012 election. Voters usually just like to express their preference and have it known than decide the vote that will make an election. It is more likely that your vote will count if you are educated in the happenings of the government, and maybe your vote can make a difference. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author thinks that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers. He states that our travels on Earth and other planets, etc. should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation.\n\nThe author states multiple ways to study Venus despite all of the dangers. For instance he states that a possible solution to the hostile conditions is to hover in a vehicle, about 30 or more miles above the planet. The temperature would still be pretty hot at about 170 degrees, but the air pressure would still be close to our sea level on Earth. They would'nt be easy living conditions; however, they would be survivable for humans.\n\nAstronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system and was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported different forms of life, just like Earth. Venus is the closest planet to Earth in size and in distance too; therefore, it can be our nearest option for a planetary visit. I think it would be a very neat experience to study Venus. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author says it is difficult to study the planet up close. It is also known as the earth's twin because it is really close in size to the earth. No spaceship has ever gone or landed on venus so no one really knows what it looks like on the surface. venus only has 97% of carbon dioxide that vlankets it. it is 800 degrees fahrenheit so we would burn and our spaceship would burn. the atrmosperic pressure is 90 times greater than on earth so the spaceship and us would get crushed and any machinery on the service would get crushed. scientist want to study the planet because it is said that it is much like the earth but there really is no way to study the surface of the planet with out everything getting destroyed by the heat and pressure. so many are really curios to see what the planet looks like. maybe one day something will be invented so that it can be taken to venus and dropped on it so we can better see what the surface of the planet looks like and so we could also get a better look at the planet. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "America's great past time might now be just that, in the past. This isn't baseball though, it's the usage of our American vehicles. America was the frontrunner in the invention of cars and has the motor capital of the world in Detroit. However, We've come a long way since the model T and now it is time to move forward into a new, cleaner era of transportation. Cities all across the world have begun the process of minimzing the usage of private motor vehicles to help stop pollution, and to encourage the use of public transportation. The trend is already upon us in America as well, as a study showed that between 2001 and 2009 the amount of young people driving has decreased by 23 percent. Life without cars has proven beneficial to many cities around the world and it is time to spread to all cities.\n\nFirst off, limiting the usage of cars will vastly decrease the amount of pollution to our environment. Recently in Paris, France the government banned all drivers with odd license plates on the first day and all even number plates the second during a two day effort to minimize the smog and pollution of the city. This method proved to be very effectiveas the capital decreased its congestion by 60 percent. This little experiment may seem like a very small accomplishment, but it should serve to be the precedent by which other countries can help stop pollution. If this was done once evry month in major cities around the world it would cause a major decrease in pollution. In the long term it shows people that having their own car isn't always necessary and it is better for the environment to use public tranportation, and or other means to get to one's destination. Bogota, Colombia also participated in their second anual car-free day. This was considered to be a huge success by their mayor and many other South American leaders came to witness it themselves. They were all thouroughly impressed by the programs effectiveness and have thought about implementing it in their own countries.\n\nSecondly, limiting car usage will result in different city layouts that could prove to be more desirable and efficient. In Vauban, Germany they have decided to go nearly car free with 70 percent of residents not owning a car. Car ownership is allowed but the owner of the vehicle must buy a space in a large parking garage for 40,000 dollars. Many of the residents claim that they lived a more stressful life when they owned a car and are now much happier because of the sale of their vehicle. This has started a trend in Europe of small suburban communities going car free to help the environment and their lives. This shift into a car free world is sparking the idea for new city designs to make them denser so mit is easier for people to travel from place to place. Stores can be placed only a walk away on a main street as opposed to a large shopping mall that is along a large highway.\n\nIn conclusion, limiting the use of cars and motor vehicles would prove to be extremely benficial for our world and our society. It would help solve the pollution and global warming crisis by limiting the amounts of carbon dioxide we put into our atmosphere. It would also change the shape of our suburban life, making it easier for people to get from place to place while still maintaining their green lifestyle. An Earth without cars becomes an Earth with a more peaceful environment and a healthy atmosphere. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "People think that driverless cars are in our near future. I think they are not going to be because people still have to drive them, they are not safe, and they will cost a lot of money. I think that driverless cars are pointless.\n\nPeople will still have to drive the so called \"driverless car.\" According to the text, \"They can steer, accelerate, and brake themselves, but all are designed to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skills, such as navigating through work zones and around accidents.\" The cars will not be totally driverless because if there is a work zone, an accident, when pulling in and out of driveways, or dealing with complicated traffic the person in the driver seat will have to take over the car. This means the driver will have to stay alert at all times.\n\nIf you get in a car accident with a driverless car, you will not know who is to blame-the driver or the manufacturer. The text states, \"Still, even if traffic laws change, new laws will be needed in order to cover liability in the case of an accident. If the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault-the driver or the manufacturer?\" No one will want to buy a driverless car because they do not want to get in an accident. The driver's of the car will say it's the manufacturers fault, but the manufacturer will says it is the driver's fault.\n\nDriverless cars are going to be so expensive. No one will want to buy them except for rich people. The text also states, \"Radar was a device on a hilltop that cost two hundred million dollars. It wasn't something you could buy at Radio Shack.\" This shows that it cost a lot of money to build driverless cars, so the selling price is going to be even higher because they have to make a profit from them.\n\nOn the other hand, some people believe that the driverless car is the next best thing. An example is, \"Some manufacturers hope to do that by bring in-cer entertainment and information systems that use heads-up displays. Such displays can be turned off instanly when the driver needs to take over-something not available to drivers trying to text with a cell phone. In this way, the in-car system is actually a safety feature, and safety is a big concern.\" Some people like this idea because they will not be bored when they are waiting to drive.\n\nIn conclusion, I think that driverless cars are pointless. They are not even \"driverless cars\" because people will still have to drive, it is not very safe, and it is going to cost a lot of money. There will lots of accidents and then people will stop buying them and trying to return the ones they have bought.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Today, there are advance technology in the society such as computers, cars, cell phones, and etc but no one ever tried to develop an driverless cars. Today in our society, many people tried to develop new technologies because things are getting more advanced an effective. Driverless cars are one of their plan, where the cars has sensors and know what to do. I agree the development of driverless cars because the cars uses less fuel, less car accidents, and there is still alert in the car.\n\nThe driverless cars should be develop and introduced to the soiety because the cars uses less fuel than the cars we used today. The text states, \"The cars he foresees would use half the fuel of today's taxis.\" From this example we can tell that the cars is great because they used less fuel than the the cars we sued today. Thus, people do not have to worried about they will ran out the fuel when they're driving. Most of the people loved to use cars that used less fuels because they do not have to spend much money on the fuel. The text also states, \"Offer far more flexibility than a bus.\" This example shows that the driverless cars have more rooms than a bus. People to sit in a place where there is not croweded because it's comfortable. Driverless cars solved the overcroweded the problem because it got more spaces. Thus, I agree the development of the cars.\n\nWhile the driverless cars used less fuel, the cars can drive million miles without a crash. The text states, \"Their cars have driven more than half million miles without a crush.\" This example tells us that the car is safer than the cars we drive today. If a car can drive million miles without any crashing then we considered it's an great car because most of the cars were not safe and it gets into car accident very often.\n\nThe most important is that there are still alert in the car. The text states, \"...Google cars aren't truly driverless; they still alert the driver to take over when pulling in and out of hallways.\" This example shows that when there is something happened to the car, the cars will alert the driver that there is something going on but most of the cars do not have that kind of technique. Second, the text states, \"Dealing with comlicated traffic issues, such as navigating through roadwork or accidents.\" This example shows that when there is an major accidents or traffic issues then the car will alert you to move out the car quickly before anything happened. In other hand, people disagree to develop the driverless cars. The text states, \"Why would anyone want a driverless cars that still needs a driver?\" They claimed that the driverless cars should do everything by itself instead having the dirver controlling it. They think there is no difference if we use a normal car. I disagree with them because it's safer if we have a real driver in the car, they'll prevent anything bad happened.\n\nDriverless cars can have more advanced technique in the future when there are more people supporting it. Thus, we should not give up on developing the cars because the cars uses less fuel, less car accidents, and there are still alert in the car that helped people to know what happened. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Technology is advancing everyday and the idea of a facial action coding system on computers is a leap in the right direction. Of course, this system would have its pros and cons but using it in a classroom would be very helpful to everyone in the classroom. The use of modified technology to identify human emotions in classrooms would be very valuable to the teacher and the student because of the vast amount of information that could be transmitted to your teacher to help you understand what you need too.\n\nThe facial action coding system is very unique in the way that it does its job. The program constructs a 3-D computer model of the face, with all 44 major muscles in the model (paragraph 3). In paragraph 4, Dr. Huang states that the facial expressions for each emotion are universal and can be identified in everyone. Further more, if a teacher had this program in their classroom it could identify drowsiness, confusion, or anger in a student and know that the he/she (the teacher) needs to do something to help the student. If a teacher could see that just one or two students look confused then they could meet privately with them after class, but if the teacher sees the majority of the class is filled with confusion and anger then he/she may need to teach the material in a different way because the students are obviously not understanding it. This could act as direct feedback to the teacher which would be beneficial to the students, and the teacher.\n\nThe facial action coding system of course would have some negative affects in the classroom that may be very controversial to the students and the families of the students. For example, if one student kept just repitidely getting called on to answer questions and getting them wrong in front of the whole class because the teacher knew that that student was confused and needed help, then that student may start to get mocked or made fun of because of how they were missing the eaisest questions in class that day. So then it becomes the issue of where do you draw the line, if a teacher knows that a student is very confused do you keep calling on them to answer easy questions and try to help them even if they are getting laughed at in class or do you just simply ignore their emotions. The use of coding programs in class would be a very controversial topic between families because they may not want to put their child's information out to the school like that.\n\nAlthough there are minimal negative effects to the coding system, the positive effects of the system would trump them. Another way this program would be valuable to teachers would be the fact that the system can tell when a student is faking or showing true emotions (stated in paragraph 7 of the article). If a student told the teacher that he was late to class because he was in the bathroom, but in reality he was just talking to his boyfriend/girlfriend, the teacher could do a quick scan of a face and see if he or she was lying. Of course, this would take experience from the teachers but after awhile they would be able to exactly pinpoint the students emotion. In paragaph 8, it states that experts with the right indicators of emotions can tell when someone is lying. As the program advances, it would become apparent to most people when someone is lying. This could be very valuable in a classroom and cut down on misbehavior, students would be promted to stay focused and behave if they know their teacher knows their exact emotions at a given time.\n\nTeachers could use this program to keep their students on task throughout the class period. For example, if a teacher were to to tell their students to get out their laptops and watch a 30 minute lecture at their desks of what they will be covering for the next. The teacher could simply use the facial action coding system to note the expressions of every student throughout the course of the video. If a teacher sees a student showing guilt then the teacher could check on the student and make sure they are on task. This would be very valuable to a classroom and make the work done much more efficient, out of fear for the students\n\nthat your teacher knows the exact emoitions you are feeling.\n\nFinally, if a teacher could read the emotional expression of a student in a classroom and saw that one of their students was feeling sad and depressed, then they could meet with them after class and talk to them about what's going on. Many students do not just openly go to the counselor when they need help, but if their teacher could talk to them, maybe they would be inclined to go talk with a counselor and get help, making the students day much more enjoyable.\n\nAll in all, the use of facial action coding system in a classroom would be very beneficial to the teachers, and to the students, even if they did not like it. Teachers could use the program to help and meet with students that are not understanding the material, or use the program to keep students on task, making the learning experience in the classroom much more efficient.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Technology should be allowed to read other student's emotions. It is a wise way to help the student and also help the teacher if he or she knows how the student is feeling in their classroom. It is a brand new use of technology. It is also a new, useful, and entertaing way to use technology.\n\nFirst, if a computer can read a sudent's emotions, then it can allow the teacher to know if that student is doing well of not. Dr. Huang, a professor at University of Illinois, states that \"A classroom computer could recognize when as tudent is becoming confused or bored\" he then continues his statement with \"then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor\" This will help students to better understand the subject that they would've had trouble with if the teacher didn't know how the student felt.\n\nOne may argue that there are other ways for the teacher to help the student; like extra help after school or the student can ask the teacher for clarification on the topic. Dr. Huang describes that \"most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication. In modern days; people, especially students, don't feel comftorable with expressing their emotions. Which is why we should have a way to help all students succeed in school.\n\nSecond, being able to find out others emotions would be entertaining. A popular item several years ago was the mood color ring. When the ring would come in contact with your skin, it would change colors based off your hand tempeture. The colors would match up with a key that told you what colors meant which. For example, red would mean angry and yellow would mean happy and purple meant sad. The idea of technology being able to state your feelings is just an advanced mood ring. There are other reasons that this idea would be entertaining. It's an annoyance t have web browser ads that aren't interesting to you, but ads that do interest you are kind of nice to have. If your computer can read your expressions while seeing these ads, it can show ads that would possibly interest you.\n\nAn argument could be that it's an invasion of privacy. The computer isn't reading you mind or stating you thoughts. The computer is just being helpful with what happens on its screen.\n\nFinally, the ability to read one's emotions with a computer is a brand new and special use of technology. The way it works is descibed in paragraph 2 where \"the computer constructs a 3-D model of the face; all 44 major muscles in the model must move like human muscles\" after this, Dr. Paul Eckman, creator of Facial Action Coding System (FACS) \"classified six basic emotions- happiness, suprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness- and then associated each with characteristic movements of the facial muscles\" That is amazing! Dr. Eckman created a way for technology to scan the many muscles of a human face and classify them with a variety of six emotions. This is a revolutionary new advancment in technology.\n\nIn conclusion, it is helpful for a computer to read your emotions. It's a fun way just to mess around and interact with friends. It also has educational purposes to allow the teacher to discover ways to be helpful to all of his or her students. And it's a large advancment in technology.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article, \"Driverless Cars Are Coming,\" the reader can see and undertsnad many aspects and many positive and negative ideas about cars driving themselves. In my opinion, I am against the idea of cars driving themselves because it could be dangerous and not a very good idea within young drivers and or the elderly. There are many good things about the idea, but more so bad things pop out as the reader reads the passage.\n\nI am against the idea of cars driving themselves because driving is something most people like doing and look farward to in the day. Especially new drives, like teenagers. If the driverless cars came into place, they would not feel the thrill of the driving experience as elderly's have had. Driving is a way to gain responsibilty and endure that responsilbilty. By having driverless cars, they would have to somewhat pay attention to what is going on, but the car would be doing all the job for them. They would not have to worry about what is going on and that responsibilty would go away. \"Presently, traffic laws are written with the assumption that the only safe car has a human driver in control at all times.\" This quote from the text helps utilize and provide examples, that human drivers are safer and have a better sense of alert in case of an emergency. Technology breaks and malfunctions all the time, why wouldn't these cars do the same?\n\nDriving should be something a driver looks farward to on the daily basis. If driverless cars were to come in place, the thrill would be long gone and everything would just be normal and boring. \"Wouldn’t drivers get bored waiting for their turn to drive? \" The only way they would get to drive is if the car were to sense bad roads or work roads. That is when the driver would only become alert. Teenage drivers have a problem with text and driving, now if the driverless cars were to come in place, they would start texting more and of course, paying less attention to what is going on in front of them. For example, they are in the driverless car, texting, and all the sudden the car signals it is their turn to drive, the teenager is not going to stop texting right away until he/she has sent that text message. It will cause a collision that could lead to something so terrible and haunting.\n\nDriverless cars can also affect the elderly people in the sense that since they are on their elder stage they do not have as fast reaction time as a teenager or adult person. It would take them longer for them to get ahold of the wheel and drive. Maybe they are paying attention, but they have a hearing problem, how would they hear the signal that is being given to them? Technology is not their thing, especially if someone has not taught them how to work certain technology items and helped them figure out how everything works and run smoothly. Elderly people are careful, yes, but it is not not safe for them to drive such an advanced car that could make them lose their life of parts of their body. They are too fragile in case of an accident. \"They can steer, accelerate, and brake themselves, but all are designed to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skills, such as navigating through work zones and around accidents. This means the human driver must remain alert and be ready to take over when the situation requires.\" It proves that the driver has to be alert at all times and be ready whenever they have to take over. Again, elderly people do not have as fast reaction time as young drivers.\n\nIn conclusion, driverless cars should not be considered because of all the risk factors it could bring. In teenagers, texting and driving. In elders, reaction time is not as fast for them as a young driver. Driverless cars should not take place until the government notices people will actually take this responsibilty and not mess around. Everything should be taken into consideration at the time of buying and who the buyer is. Driverless cars, should not be taken into consideration for these next generations. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "This is going to be about you going to be in the seagoing cowboys. If you want to join you should join when you are in high school. This is a really fun experince where you get to travel everywhere. There are places you probably have never been to.\n\nYou join when you are in high school and travel in a ship. You should join because you actually see what has happened in other countries that you havent been to. There are many\n\nplaces that you can travel to like China. This will be a unforgetable moment. You travel places so you can help other people. You will see what there is there.\n\nThis is a big experince for everybody to see and never forget. You get to ride in a ship and get to help with stuff. You sometimes get to have a little fun time and play basketball and volleyball. Or you could do something else of your own. It was really a enjoyable time there.\n\nThe seagoing cowboys have traveld to very far away places. China has been one of. Them and it is really far from united states. Aleast you get to help others in need of there family. You can give them food and clothing or shelter. This is a really big help to everyone in need and you would always count on them.\n\nIn conclusion, this is ohe job i suggest you doing. You travel everywhere and see places. You help other people in need. You can give them food and then cross over waves to go to other places. This is a really big opportunity to travel and have a good time with people. You can meet new people and help there family.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The new software, the facial action coding system in my opinion i think it is valuable. the software or computer can recognize your emotions and the emotions of others. this new software,the facial action coding system has promising applications for variety of industries. the software is the latest innovation from prof. Dr. Huang and his colleague are experts at developing better ways for humans and computers to communicate.\n\nThis new software and technology to be in classrooms i think it is a great idea. This new software well help the teachers in the classrooms and students tell when a kid is feeling some type of way. now teachers will know what students are really thinking and hiding. All the software has to do is construct a 3-D computer model of the face all 44 major muscles and it'll tell you your emotions or that students emotions. this computer and software can recgnize when a student is becoming bored or confused.\n\nso i do think this new software is valuable in a classroom with students. it could tell the emotions of a famous painting from leonardos da vincis , mona lisa. this software will help a lot in any place it is placed.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Venus has being so interested to NASA whenn they started attacking the planet.When they saw that nothing was happening they started to explore what was it made out of. Venus is a nickname, but it was wierd since theres planet that its called venus too.\n\nIn space- Humans have send numorous of spacecraft to distroy that world. This atmostphear is almost 90 percent carbon dioxide of blanket. Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers that NASA had an idea to send humans to study about Venus. An example of how I know this is because the text says, \" The National Aeronautics and Space Administrator (NASA) had one particularly compelling idea for sending humans to study about Venus\". At thirty or more miles above surface the temperature is around at 170 degrees fahrenheit. Venus could be so important that NASA want to keep looking for a way to learn about Venus. An Example is, \"NASA is working on other approaches to studying Venus\". They are looking back to old computers that are old. The first envisioned was in the 1800s to play an important role in the 1940s about the World War War II.I know this because in the text it says, \"Another project is looking back to an old technology called mechanical computers\". Venus has value because of the gained inside on itself and the curiosity will lead us into many eaqually intimidating endeavors. The pessure on this atmosphere is 90 times more greator then our own planet. Also, they are more extreme than anything humas encounter on earth. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Humans are very curious creatures and with that curiosity we have gone on to explore and understand many concepts of life. We've gone on to explore our planet but now its time to exlpore others. In the article \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\",the author explains about what challenges lie ahead in trying explore Venus. Even though the author explains the challenges that come with exploing the planet he is able to make comebacks on how to solve these challenges. With this strategy the author does a good jobs supporting the idea that studying and exploring Venus is worth it overall.\n\nIn the article the author presents the following problems,\n\n\"no spacecraft surivied the landing for more than a few hours, a thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide, clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid, 800 degrees Fareheit, atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater, erupting volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, and frequent lighting stirkes\" With so many problems that the author has presented, it seems like it isnt even worth going to Venus . But then he starts to provide solutions. To avoid all of the harsh conditions the author explains that NASA would have scientist float above to fray, which just means that scientist would just float above Venus and study it from afar. Along with that there would be a bunch of solar energy and low radiation. So far this only provides a solution to dodging harsh conditions but we still cant get close enough to get a sample of anything. For that to happen we need to send something down into Venus. The solution the author provided is \" NASA is working on other approaches to studying Venus. For example, some simplified electronics made of silicon carbide have been tested in a chamber simulating the chaos of Venus's surface and have lasted for three weeks in such conditions.\" They also think that mechanical computers woud work too. Which makes calculations by using gears and levers, they also can be more resistant to pressure, heat, and other forces. Making a robot of this could mean it would have enought time to collect samples from the planet. Now that we have the solutions why should we go through all of the trouble just to study Venus? Well paragaph 4 states ,\"Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well have been the most Earth-like planet in our solsr system. Long ago Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth. Venus can sometimes be our nearest option for a planetary visit.\" If Venus was once like earth then maybe we could learn about our planet by taking a look at Venus and not only that it can be very close by in terms of traveling. On the last pragrpah the author explains how exploring Venus will help with on gaining insight but also \"lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors\"\n\nOverall the author does a good job on convincing the reader that we should explore Venus and that it would be worth it in the end. He is able to provide solutions to the challenges and does a good job explaning how exploring Venus would be beneficial. He is able to convince me and hopefully others that the planet is worth exploring.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article \"Driverless Cars are coming\" the author gives pros and cons about these cars, in my opinion I think these cars would be great later on in the future. The reasons for my choice are that they are great on saving fuel, they are helpful when it can assits you in any way, and they are safer than the cars we have on the road today.\n\nMy first reason is that they are great on saving fuel, I agree with this because the cofounder stated \"He envisions a future with a public transportation system where fleets of driverless cars form a public-transport taxi system. The cars he foresees would use half the fuel of today’s taxis and offer far more flexibility than a bus.\" I agree with this statement because, with the technology we have today the newer cars will be using more electricity and less fuel.\n\nMy second reason, they are helpful when it can assit the driver in any way. I agree with this because Car companies are working hard to make a car driverless. In 2013 BMW announced a new feature they are testing called \"Traffic Jam Assistant\" meaning the car can handle itself at speeds up to 25 mph but the driver must hold the wheel in case of any emergency. This just proves how helpful these cars will be in random scenerios.\n\nMy final reason, they are safer than cars on the roads today. I agree with this because since they have sensors around these cars they will be more alert than the human is while driving. In 2009 Google had cars drive independently in specfic conditions. The cars they used had more than half a million miles without a crash, the odds of crashing in cars like these are low and with more technology being used everyday. Cars like these might have better braking than cars on the street today.\n\nIn conclusion, the cars that are being tested for the future will impact the future in a positive way. The cars will be some of the best ever made. The cars wouldn't be that much more expensive than cars we have now since driverless cars will be on the street more than cars without the features driverless cars have. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author suggests if our sister plante is so inhospitable why are scientists even discussing further visits to its surface astronomers are fascinated by discussing astrononmers are fascinated by venus because it may well once have been the most earth-like planet in our solar system. long ago venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life,just like earth today venus still has some features that a surface of rocky sediment and includes familiar features such as valleys moutains and craters. Furthermore, recall that venus can sometime be our nearest option for space travel. The value of returning to venus seems indisputablen but what are the options for makeing\n\nsuch a miaaion both safe and scientifically productive\n\nThe national aeronautics and space administration NASA has one particularly compelling idea for sending humans to study venus. NASA possible solution to the hostile conditions\n\non the surface of venus would allow scientists to float abover the roiling venusian landscape. Just as our jet ariplanes travel at a higher altitude to fly over many storms, avehicle hovering over.\n\nHowever peering at venus from a ship orbtiing or hovering safely far above the above the plante can provdie only limited insight on ground conditions far above the plante can prvide.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "People are finally opening their eyes to the world around them, and realizing the way things are, could be changed. The automotive world is steadily declining, in an attempt to help our world, and it's not all that bad. Less cars are being bought, less emissions are being released into the atmosphere, and people are seeing the advantages of limited car usage.\n\n\"Street parking, driveways and home garages are generally forbidden in this experimental new district on the outskirts of Freiburg, near the French and Swiss borders.\" (Derived from the source, \"\n\nIn German Suburb, Life Goes On Without Cars\n\n\")This place is called Vauban, it's a suburb in which 70% of families don't own cars, and 57% actually sold their car to move here. Car ownership is allowed here, there are only two places to park however, and both are very expensive. People in this city alone have not only reduced greenhouse gas emissions, they've helped the world by giving a new perspective on living, and they've even made themselves feel better in the process. Heidrun Walter said, \"When I had a car I was always tense. I'm much happier this way.\" Advantages of a car reduced community didn't just stop here, other places around the world are seeking out the benefits of limiting car use, and adopting some of the same aspects of this experiment.\n\n\"After days of near-record pollution, Paris enforced a partial driving ban to clear the air of the global city.\" The smog was horrible, people were even comparing it to Bejing. The city of Paris was engulfed in the choking air caused by the cars that conjested the streets. \"[Last] week Paris had 147 micrograms or particulate matter per cubic meter compared with 114 in Brussels and 79.7 in London...\" Paris generally had more smog than a number of European capitals. However, the ban worked exceptionally well. The smog had cleared enough in one weekend for the ban to be lifted the following Tuesday. Imagine if every community were to try something like this, just imagine how clean the air would be. Not only would the world be healthier, we'd be healthier ourselves if we just limited car usage even a miniscule amount.\n\nNot only is the world becoming healthier as a whole an advantage to lower car use, all the way down to our communities would become better also. \"The day without cars is an improvement campaign that began in Bogota in the mid-1990s.\" People go a whole day without using cars, with the exception of buses or taxis, and those that do use cars get fined. The citizens bike and hike and enjoy life without breathing in the smog that usually plagues the air. This event has caused some major improvements to the city. \"It has seen the construction of 118 miles of bicycle paths, the most of any Latin American city, according to Mockus, the city's mayor.\" Also, \"Parks and sports centers also have bloomed throughout the city; uneven, pitted sidewalks have been replaced by broad, smooth sidewalks; rush-hour restrictions have dramatically cut traffic; and new restaurants and upscale shopping districts have cropped up.\" This entire city has reaped the benefits of just one day without cars. Citizens here have not only began to improve themselves, but have also improved the world around them.\n\nIn conclusion, the advantages of limited car usage are finally being noticed throughout the world. Cities are experimenting and gathering results of not only better health in people in these communities, but even better living in the long run. Cities are becoming denser to make walking easier, sports centers and better sidewalks are blooming into city living, and people are even feeling better themselves from these experiments. Throughout the world limting the use of cars is spreading, and every where it goes people are seeing an upside. The more people that try to limit car usage, the better it will be, for the world, and for us as people. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "We should go with changing to election by popular vote for president because under the electoral college system, voters vote not for the president, but for a slate of electors, who turn in elect the president. The American people should consider themselves lucky that the 2000 fiasco was the biggest election crisis in a century,the system allows for much worse. Back in 1960, segregationists in the Lousisiana legislature nearly succeded in replacing the Democratic electors with new electors who would oppose John F. Kennedy.\n\nPerhaps most worrying is the prospect of a tie in the electoral vote. In the case, the election would be thrown to the house of Representatives, where state delegations vote for president. During the 2000 campaign, seventeen states didnt see the candidates at all, including Rhode island and South Carolina, and the voters in 25 of the largest media markets didnt get to see a single campaign ad.\n\nIts official: the electoral college is unfair, outdated, and irrational. So the United states will not being the Electoral college ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think that others should participate in the Seagoing Cowboys program. There are lots of cool, fun things to do here. There are also lots of serious, dangerous things. You have to be really careful doing this job. It can be really fun here.\n\nFirst off, we have fun things to do including here for everyone. One of them is playing baseball with the other cowboys. We also like to play volleyball in the empty holds where the animals had been housed. We have table-tennis tournaments. Some cowboys even like to do other things including fencing, boxing, whittling, games, and more!\n\nSometimes, on my freetime I like to care for the animals during crossing. Being a Segoing Cowboy is much more than an adventure for me. It opened up the world for me. I'm grateful for the oppurtunity. It made me more aware of pepole of other countries and their needs. And this awareness has stayed with me, leading my family to host a number of international students and exxhange visitors for many years.\n\nThe cattle-boat trips were an unbelievable oppurtunity for a small-town boy. Besides helping people, I had the side benefit of seeing Europe and China. But seeing the Acropolis in Greece was special. So was taking a gondola ride in Venice, Italy, a city with streets of water. I also toured an excavated castle in Crete and marveled at the Panama Canal on my way to China.\n\nIn conclusion, I think that all men should join the Seagoing Cowboys program because it allows you to experience adventures and visit many unique places.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "i fell that this computer program counldnt do so well becase if your a teatch and you have had the studens say for 4 months you should have an under standing on how this person fell and what faces they make when mad, happy, upest, angry, and more.\n\nwhat if this program works it could open a lot more programs to the world and help you with every day life or just work. for example say your going to ask your boss for a rase you could just walk by make it look like your texting your frinds and but you find out your boss is upset or mad you can know when a good time is to ask for your rase or more houres. but on the other hand this program could work for a while till it it gets something wrong and you lose your job and or say something that will hurt the other person. eve if they do all this programing whos has the money to go out and buy the software and program and whatever else you need most schools spend money on what they need not what makes them happy. and just simpily most school wouldnt want to have a prodct like this. for example apples vs samsung they both make phones, they run diffrent software, have mostly same apps, they are made same places, and many more but people are paying for apple simply because famouse people same thing with samsung. and to be 100% honest i dont see famouse peopel haveing this.\n\n\"\n\na classroom computer recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored.\" i think if this how the world becomes that we would become even more scumbags than were are already. it would make us lazy and we will loss ourselfs in more tech.\n\nme personly i think that this programing could be good and or could be bad. but if this comes out you will not have most schools buy it or just most peolpe. i feel this would be something of the highher class and privet schools. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Spending gargantuan amounts of time making self-driving cars is a bad idea. Sure, there would probably be less accidents and less rule breaking but in the long run, that would cause a lot of unemployment. If people no longer have to drive themselves, that would mean that police men would not need to arrest people from the road. Although that seems like a good thing (and it is meaning that there will be less accidents), not every police man can be a detective. In that case, there would be less job oppotunities and more unemployment with, which seems to be a more important issue than having possible car trouble.\n\nIf people would be a little more responsible in the way they drive, there would be no need to make cars that drive themselves. Instead, we should be thinking more into the lines of a beter fuel source. This is why spending gargantuan amounts of time making self-driving cars is a bad idea.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article \"Unmasking the Face on Mars\" it says that it seems to be a face on mars,but there is not. The \"face\" that we see on is just a natural land form. We can tell that by many ways. Some ways are that in 2001 we see a picture of the so called \"face of mars\" closer and see it is not something created by aliens.\n\nOne way we know that the landform on mars is not made by aliens is that; scientist took a sharper photograph of the \"face\" in 2001. NASA states,\"What the picture actually shows is the martian equivalent of a butte or mesa-landforms common around the American West.\" The scientist prove that the \"face\" is just a landform.\n\nAlso the article tells us that hollywood makes up a lot of these things about there being aliens. In paragraph five it says,\"The \"Face on Mars\" has since become a pop icon. It has starred in a hollywood film, appeared in books,magazines, and radio talk shows...\" Hollywood makes up things like this to make us beleave in something just for them to make money.\n\nNow on the other hand this could be true. Aliens could of put it there. The article even states,\"Some people think the Face is\n\nbona fide evidence of life on Mars-evidence that NASA would rather hide...\" There is a chance however,\" Meanwhile, defenders of the NASA budget wish there was an achient civilization on Mars.\"\n\nIn the article it does state that there could be a \"Face\" on Mars made by aliens, but facts prove that the \"Face\" is just a natural landform. The picture took in 2001 proves alone that it is only a landform. So for now we know that Marvin the Martian isn't flying around building ancient civilizations. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the book of the challenged of exploring venus.\n\nthe author suggests that starving venus persuit despite all the density present the venus has many systems that we don't know about the planet of the venus. venus is the our other planetary neighboor orbit the sun at different speeds. {NASA} are trying to studying one particulary compelling idea for sending humans. NASA also studying some simplified electronics made silicon carbie have been tested in a chamber simulating the chaos of venus's surface and have lasted for three weeks in such condition. venus is one of the hottest planet in sum orbital. Now the NASA were sending scientific to the spaceship to learn some other planet, what are the different thing from other planet. sometime people called to venus \"Evening star\", is the one of the brightest points of light in the night sky. in this years,people get a lot of experience from the venus and learn what they have to do with those experience they have, and then use in our Earth. Venus and Mars are hottest planet including in the un orbital. Our planet and Veenus planet are so many differetn and also there was a lot of different thing and weird seen in the Venus planet. On the planet's surface, temperatures average over 800 degrees fahrenheit, and the atmoshpheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet. The scientific travels on earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innvation.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think the use of this technology is valuable for games or computers or cameras because people can already kinda notice how other people emotions are by how there body movement are and how the tone in there voice is or the looks on there face. I think this technology would be helpful becasue on video games you can see the emotions of the characters on the game or the emotions of a person in a picture. Like It said in the article below the picture she's 83% happy, 9% disgusted and 6% fearful and 2% angry, that's what the new technology recgonized. Using video imagery the new emotion- recognition software tracks these facial movements. The new software can even identify mixed emotions to. His new computer software stores similar anatomical information as electronic code. In the article says Dr. Huang predicts then it could modify the lesson like an effective human insturctor; The same technology can make computer-animated faces more expressive for video games or video surgery. Dr. Huang also notes that most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication so computers need to under stand that too. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The building & testing of driveless cars, driveless cars are cars that basically just drive themselves. I think this development of driveless cars are outragious. They will have so many sensors on them to know there surroundings. Which may be good but, what about weather conditions are they going to be able to tell that. What if the car is just driving not aware of weather conditions & it starts hailing, the hail could possibly break a sensor & throw off the whole car. Driveless cars just do not seem to safe. Also, what is the fun of just sitting in the car with itself driving you around. You do not get to experience the joys of driving by yourself. Driveless cars are a very intelligent idea, but is this idea very thought through. Why are we humans getting so lazy that we now need cars to drive themselves. I think that is pure laziness, & in ways selfish. But I disagree with the whole idea. Yes, it is intelligent but, no I do not think it is safe. And, you can not in joy the wonders of driving a car. Also, what about pot holes, are they going to avoid them. What if they hit a pot hole & bust a tire. Then your driveless car might continue to drive with a busted tire, that is very dangerous. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "NASA often wonders about each planet and if they can support human life. They often send astronauts out to explore the other planets in our solar system and see what lies on the surface. Related to Earth, Mars and Venus are the only other two planets that relate most to the Earth in ways such as climate and being able to support human life. Studies have been done on Mars and the studies show that Mars is very similar to the Earth but they have not yet determined if the planet can provide life for humans. But what about Venus? It is very similar to Earth as well but why have no studies been recorded on Venus?\n\nVenus is often called the \"Evening star\" but it isn't actually a star, it's a planet. Venus is also called \"Earth's twin\" because of it's similarity in size and density to Earth. Venus, Earth and Mars all orbit the Sun, but at different speeds. These different speeds often result in humans being able to see Venus as if it is a star. Many spacecrafts have been sent to Venus to conduct stuides but none have ever been successful due to the conditons of Venus' surafce. I think that if humans could find a way to safely observe Venus and determine it's climate and what is on the surface, then it would be worth the risk of getting close to the planet.\n\nAstronomers wonder why the conditions of Venus are the way they are such as being draped in a thick layer of carbon dioxide and what could have caused it. They are also fascinated by the fact that Venus could have been able to sustain oceans like Earth does at one time but they just haven't found a way to get down the the surface yet. I think if NASA could find a way to get down to the surface of Venus it would be important because they could possibly come up with an answer as to why Venus is not able to support life. The terrain of Venus is very similar to Earth, such as having hills, valleys, and mountains which makes astronomers wonder if human life could have actually lived on this planet at one time. But if humans could actually get down to the surface of Venus we could possibly determine what is causing the carbon dioxide blanket or what is causing the conditions of Venus to become so extreme.\n\nMany people wonder, \"well how could humans get down to Venus without risking their lives?\" Humans cannot actually get down to the surface of Venus and have enough time to roam the surface of the planet and observe the causes of it's conditions because of the temperature and pressure beneath the cloud of carbon dioxide. Although these conditions are life threatening, NASA has came up with an idea to study and observe from a farther perspective. Planes hover over storms in order to keep passangers safe so NASA has came up with an idea to build a blimp like vehicle. This vehicle will be able to hover 30 or so miles above the atmosphere of Venus. By performing this experiment, humans will be able to safely observe the surface of Venus without putting themselves at any risk.\n\nAlthough if this experiment were to actually happen, the temperatures would still be very high but the air pressure would be suitable for humans. The other let down of being able to stay above the atmosphere of Venus is that not enough light would be able to shine through the atmosphere of Venus so that humans could have a clear visual as to what is on the surface. It would help human curiosity if this experiment could be conducted but many other risks play a big role in ths experiment as well. We have to think about the right materials needed in order to safely send humans into space near Venus and to also make sure they are able to safely return to Earth. If we send humans up into space we also want to make sure they have the proper equipment to keep themselve safe. They would also need to have a backup plan/procedure in case something were to go wrong. A humans curiosities about Venus can be met but the correct knowledge and protection qualifications have to be met first in order to conduct the experiment safely. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I am against the development of these cars because it is not certain that you will be safe while in this car. If there were to be a malfuntion with the system you and anyone who is in one those cars can get injured. It would be easier and much safer to just drive the car yourself. Yeah it would be less work for you if you got a driverless car, but it would also be putting you in more danger than neccessery. \"In most states it is illegal to test computer driven cars.\" quoted from paragraph 9 sentece 3.\n\nThere are good things about these cars, but is it really worth put your life on the line. For the sake of human beings I do not think these cars should be sold any where. What if you were drive on the express way andthe car suddenly started to go out of control because of a virus or bug in the system. Not only would you be severly injured but you will also be risking injuring many other people around you. As time goes on new technology is invented and used all around the world. These cars are something that needs to be put on a shelf and left there. Losing your life should not be worth being in with the new technology.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article that I just read the author wrote about how venus is very similar to earh and how humans can maybe one day live on that planet. The author talks about the time NASA has tried putting a robot up there but has fialed and how the technolgy back then could have laste a longer time but had lacked the information. And how technology has advanced and is more powerful but is more fragile. And the article points out a good statement on how us as a human race should take those chances of risk and discover new places. Venus is the very similar to earth in the article it says \" venus has a surface of rocky sediment and includes familiar features such as valleys, mountains, and craters\". And they say that venus problably at one point had oceans and could've had various forms of life. In paragraph eight the author says \" insight to be gained on the planet itself but also because human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors\". Meaning that if we don't oush oursleves to go further we might not know what our limit is. And we wouldn't know what venus would be like or other planets. I think that this article really supports his idea on pushing forward and discovering new places.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars are a thing of the future. They would be very useful especially if they use less fuel than normal taxis, but in stituations where there is dangerous road conditions, like snowing flooding, and high winds, how will the car react?\n\nWith the weather always chaning will the driverless car be able keep up or will everybody just have to stop what they're doing? The weather influences driving greatly. You have to be able to drive in any condition, thats why driverless car aren't ready. If the driverless car needs someone to take over when theres road work and accidents, the same thing would happen in dangerous driving conditions. The car could not tell that there is ice on the roads. Sometimes cars hydroplane, the smart car would not be albe to right the car but, just spin out and take the impact and put lives in danger. This would increase accidents or even deaths. These cars aren't safe to drive in conditions like these. The smart car isn't smart enough to be driving in different types of weather or situations.\n\nThe car can't adapt to driving condtions, so would it be able to avoid things like pot holes and animals that run out in front of cars? Pot holes occur every where, if one of these driverless cars hits one a blows a tire the passenger could be stranded. The car couldnt have did anything to avoid the pot hole, so its not to safe. Then there are animals that jump out in front of cars last second or even people. The road is always changing and things are always happening, i dont believe the driverless car will be able to function in certain situations. Sensors can only sense so much that certain times if there is no person in the driver seat things can go wrong.\n\nThere are times in traffic that traffic ligths go out and people have to make decisions. The car can not think to stop at a flashing ready light and then yield to oncoming cars. There are situations there a person is the best option. Unless the car can think for it self. The drivrless car is too unpredicatable and can put peoples lives in danger. Accidents occur all the time, i don't believe a driverless car can avoid an ongoing accident. Then there are situations with police, or stolen cars. Would the car give away its owner if they were on the run from the police? How would traffic stops work, would the car be so perfect to not break the law? The car could be harboring fugitives or runways or even kidnapped victims. The car wouldnt be smart enought to know, its going to do what its told and drive.\n\ni dont believe that self driving cars are ready for todays society nor will they ever be. The road is alwasy changing and the car would not be able to keep up.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "You may think that the Face was created by little green men who fly around in space ships, but all that is just conspiricy. As science tells us, and from what professional scientist have researched and studied at NASA, there is no life on Mars. Whether that life form be intellegent and macroscopic (visible to the naked eye) or bactireal and microscopic (only seen with a microscope). It is obvious to tell that the Face is merely an act of nature. For example, God's Thumb, a rock formation in the desert of New Mexico. The rock formation looks the way it does from centuries of erosion from wind, water, and sand. It is likely the Face has expirienced the a congruent form of events. It is also likely that the Face is a work of volcanic activity. Mars has a rich history of volcanic activiy. Mars just happens to be the home of the largest volcano in the entire solar system. From that information, it would be of no surprise to find the Face to explode in a giant fury of smoke, ash, and lava. Although, it would be an extraordinary happening to see. Going back to the previous point made erosion, apon closer inspection, you can clearly see trenches across the Face. These may very well be from liquid water flowing on the surface, wcich recent discoveries confirms. Also, around the foot of the Face, is a large gathering of rock, dust, and other debris from probabal erosion, evidence for such thing can most likely be found right in your own back yard. Say there is a small pile of dirt or a sand box your children plays in and builds a \"mountain\" as they would call it. Then after your children come inside, it rains. when the rain stops, you go out and check to see if the area is safe to play in for your children. As you inspect the area of play, you notice small trenches and wash-out around the base of the pile of sand. With all things considered, this scientific reasoning should sway your thoughts of little green men with space ships and laser blasters.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Have you ever been mistaken by the sight of something? Well, that's what we have been having a problem with. People have been thinking that the Face on Mars is not a natural landform, but trust me, it is. We have some evidence that supports this statement very well.\n\nOne of the things that really sticks out to me and really makes me believe that the Face is just a natrual landform is the fact that it has occured to us that it's a mesa. This might just be me, but I'm almost positive that a landform like that couldn't have been made from making something like a face on the surface. I'm sure that as its grown over time, the hills make it look like a face. If some type of alien were to make that I dont think it could've turned into a mesa.\n\nI know the Face used to be a lot clearer, and slowly turned into a mesa but I think it's just the way landform grew in. The face isn't very semetrical, so I'm sure that if it was aliens, they would've been more serious about this and tried to make it more semetrical. In the article, they say that 25 years ago, they were looking for a place for NASA's Viking 1 spacecraft to land. So, assuming that the spacecraft landed sometime later in the future, it never saw any aliens! If they had seen aliens, I think they would've said something, especially after 25 years.\n\nI would say this situation is just like clouds. Sometimes you see clouds that might look like a dog or a whale, but you dont say anyone made those! You wouldn't assume it was an alien. I would say they are clouds that just happened to float by one another that formed into a dog or a whale, depending on what the cloud actually looks like. That's usually the case, a cloud could look like a big blob, but then float next to a different one and form into something unique. That happens naturally, just like the Face on Mars.\n\nWith all of the things I have said, I believe that my evidence and what I have pointed out will help other people know that the Face is just a landform. I'm not saying everyone that hears my ideas about this will automatically think its a landform now, but I do think that some of them will change their minds if they think it was made by any kind of living species. There are many landforms that were made just the way they are, even if it doesn't look like it. So, yes, the Face on Mars is just a landform, and hopefully everyone will soon know this!", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "We've been discovering things almost everyday.Until today we discovered these\n\nfaces on NASA.All the scientist around us including myself have been giving ideas of what it was.Some people say it was created by aliens on the Red Planet.\"Nonsense, I say.\"Everybody has thier own opinion.\n\nThen the research began.\"There must have been a degree of surprise among mission controllers back at the Jet Propulsion Lab when the face appeared on thier monitors.\"Everybody were asking what is that on our monitors.\"It looks like faces to me says one of scientist.\"\"A few days later NASA\n\nunveiled the image for all to see.\"Everyone was surprised at what they saw.\"The\n\ncaption noted a \"huge rock formation...which resembles a human head...formed\n\nby shadows giving the illusion of eyes, nose, and mouth.\"\n\nMe and the other scientist was really engaged at what we were doing.People\n\nnoticed every time they listen to the radio they heard about those same \"faces on mars\".\"The \"Face on Mars\" has since become a pop icon. It started in a Hollywoody film, appeared in books, magazines, radio talk shows-even haunted grocery stores checkout lines for 25 years!\"Some people in the went to go find more evidence to if it was true.\n\n\"Although few scientists\n\nbelieved the Face was an alien artifact, photographing Cydonia became a priority for NASA when Mars Global Surveyor\n\n(MGS) arrived at the Red Planet in Sept. 1997 , eighteen long years after Viking\n\nmissions ended.\"The research was getting intense.\n\nI believe that the Face on Mars were life forms.Telling you that people live on Mars.\"Although few scientists believed the Face was an alien artifact, photographing Cydonia became a priority for NASA when Mars Global Surveyor\n\n(MGS) arrived at Red Planet in Sept.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "My position on driverless cars is that we shouldnt have them. The excess money that their spending to make these car we could be spending on something more important. Driverless cars will be expenssive so many people coulnt afford them.\n\nWe shoulnt have driverless cars because at any moment they could maulfunction and could wreck. Since their driverless who would be at blame when you wrecked the computer or the person in the car? We would have to put so much money into changing the roads so the cars would work. Road work would have to be minumised so that we wouldnt have to touch the wheel at any point.\n\nMy final statement is that no we shoulnt make them because of all the money that will be wasted on making them and roadwork. We would be saving money and they wouldnt be losing money because only people that are rich could afford a car like this and people that cant would just be left out of the whole thing.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear,\n\nSate Senator ,\n\nWe need to keep the Electoral College . It clearly states in paragraph 1 why we need to keep the Electoral College there are so many reason why but only one can bring it to staying in the system.\"Electoale College is a process, not a place. The founding fathers established it in the constitution as a comprise between election of the President by vote in Congress and elction of the President by a polular vite of quarified citizens\". What i am clearly trying to state is the the Elecotoral College needs to stay in the system.\n\nMany people will say different but only in my opinion we need ot keep the Elcectral College, it is part of the Constitution of the United Sates of America if it clearly staes stuff about the Electoal College in the Consistitution then that means you need to keep it in the sistem to help with all the dier need that the world has to offer for the Electoral College just dont get rid of it for no reason you need to have a really great suggestion to remove it out of the system.\n\nAll i am trying to say is that in my opinion if you care at all, the we need to keep the Electoral College alive dont just kick it out the system if it sates its name in the Constitution then it need to stay where its at dont delte it from the program just becauss of some stupid process you need a darn good reason to remove it not just because you feel like it thats not good enough you need to show emotion about how the Electoral College is in the Constisution\n\nPlease look at my reason in why to keep it in the sytem thank you so greatly much. Just take me up on my opinion i am usally right in cases like this i show great emotion in stuff like this all you need to do is look at the facts and you will see why i want the it to stay moving and not to be kicked out. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Self driving cars are gettiong closer to our generation as time passes. In my opinion self driving cars can be an amazing improvement to both our lives and society. You have less crashes, better programming and software in the car, and more family time. If one thing's sure is that with our technology combined with the future's techonolgy self-driven cars are a reality waiting to happen.\n\nFirst of all you can have less crashes with self driving cars. Most accidents are originated by humans texting while driving, keeping your eyes of the road for family discussions or simply falling asleep on the wheel. In paragraph one it says, \"Their cars have driven more than half a million miles without a crash.\" This refers to Google\" semi self-driven car. It's not fully capable of driving alone, but it had no carshes. Also in the story says it was since 2009. That's about seven years ago. With all the technology we have now our future seems brighter and self-driven cars seem a dream we are soon going to be able to accomplish.\n\nNow a days engineers are taking cars to a whole other step. Cars have good software installed for predicting gas and oil leaks and parking backwards. Also on a Volkswagen Jetta 2016 if you're not paying attention it can break while about to rear end another car. These are all great programming and software changes. Later on we can eventually get software that will be able to make the car keep an eye on the road. It can have sensors that alert weather cars are coming from either right or left direction so it can stop. Also sensors by the tires that could eventually monitor the ground surface around it make sure there's no holes or other hazards. Car proggraming is gradually improving, and with all the technology we have now and the one we'll have in the future we will be able to have self driving cars in about\n\nthe next fifty years.\n\nCrashes occur when arguing with family members, getting distracted while talking to them, or simply just trying to socialize while you drive. These cars are improvements to daily life\n\nand reuniting families. On a road trip you have teenagers on their phones while the kids scream in the back and parents concentrate on the road. there's no time to talk, so by the car driving itself you can surely talk to your family on a family trip or any occasion you drive. Phones won't interrupt and your family could be close once again. Maybe this is a long shot, but with cars driving themselves this could also just be something waiting to happen. Self driving cars will be usefull in the future, and family time will be very good to have on that long roadtrip.\n\nAs our generation advances self-driven cars seem to be closer and closer to us. Cars will be an improvent to our lives and society. Cars will be able to prevent most crashes, and they will also have better programing and software that will be usefull on the road. Families will also be able to have more time together. We are looking at a bright automtive future with improvements waiting to happen.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "WIth the advancement of technology comes the advancement of the capability of the software on that technology. Such advancemnt can even detect one's mood, such as Prof. Thomas Huang's algorithm that can identify a person's mood based solely on a photograph. While such technology exists, it does raise the question of whether or not it should be used to read the emotions of students. This emotional expression reading technology should not be used to identify the emotions of students due to the obvious invasion of privacy and the effect it could potentially have on teachers across the country.\n\nHaving the ability to read a student's emotions is an obvious invasion of privacy. While students forfeit some of their rights at the doors of their schools, despite having fought for them in famous cases like TLO v. The State of New Jersey, the ability to read their emotions takes this lack of privacy that we have to a whole new level. Not only this, but the software even has the capability of \"identify[ing] mixed emotions\". This means that it can detect more than just one emotion at a time. Unlike other invasions of privacy, such as a school's ability to drug test freely, or the student body's capability to be subject to random searches to protect the school from drugs, weapons, and other paraphanelia, the ability to scan the students' emotions has no real arguement to support it in the interest of forfeiting even more of students' privacy rights.\n\nWhile the invasion of the students' privacy is one reason against implementing this technology into schools, another reason is the disastorous effect that it could have on the teachers. A teacher's salary and bonus is already dependent enough on students, whether it be how they perfrom on the next standardized test or how their grades improve or what they score on pre-tests at the begining of the year. If this technology were to be implemented into schools, then it would have the potential to devolve into yet another thing our teacher's ability to make ends meet depends on. With the ability to detect a student's displeasure during a certain class, the teacher's pay would be greatly effected. This, along with waging salary with students' grades, is unfair to the teachers, as some students will simply not perform as well as others on standardized tests, just like some students simply do not get along with their teachers, and to penalize for this would be unjust.\n\nWhile having this technology to scan old paintings and even your friends may be fun, to mandate its use in classrooms would be unjust. Having the capability to create and expand the limits of technology does not necessarily mean that one should. This technology, although inivative, should not be used on students.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Have you ever thought about what we would do if the earth was no longer in livable condition? Well some might think of living on a another planet, which may be possible with Venus. The author of this article has given some perfect examples as to why studying Venus is worth it.\n\nThe author supports the idea that studying Venus is worth pursuit despite the dangers it presents by stating how Venus could have been earth-like. In the passage the author explains how Venus was \"..probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life..\", the text also states that Venus had \"..a suface of rocky sediment and includes familiar features such as valleys, mountains, and craters.\" which could make Venus \"..our nearest option for a planetary visit\". The author explains how venus is not only earth-like but how us humans are just really curious about things and studying venus will help us learn new things about our solar systems and maybe even potential forms of life! In the article it states that \"venus has value, not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also because human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors.\", this shows that the author\n\nsupports the idea that studying venus is worth the trouble.\n\nWhile it is true that Venus is extremly hot (average temperature of 800 degrees Fahrenheit) we could possibly make the mission to Venus both \"safe and scientifically productive..\". The author explains that even though there are hot temperatures and extreme enviromental aspects, we could get a closer look at Venus, this shows in passage five when it says \"NASA's possible solution to the hostile conditions on the surface of Venus would allow scientists to float above the fray,..\" The author continues to say that \"a vehicle hovering over Venus would avoid the unfriendly ground conditions by staying up and out of their way.\". While the temperature would still be around 170 degrees Fahrenheit the air pressure would be lower then its orignal pressure of 90 times greater then what we experience on earth to what we have at sea level. Another example the author brought up was that \"solar power would be plentiful, and radiation would not exceed Earth levels. Not easy conditions, but survivable for humans.\" this shows that Venus could some day become our new home which is why more studies should be done on this planet.\n\nVenus may not only be useful for if we need to live there but its also one of the closest planets to Earth, which makes it a great spot to stop at on any space adventures we decide to take later on. The text states that \"Venus is the closest planet to Earth in terms of density and size, and occasionally the closest in distance too.\" which help the author prove even more that we should continue our study on Venus even though it has tough terrain and conditions that we will have to face.The author explains some of the issues that we will face due to the inability to see that much while floating from a safe distance. \"`Hovering safely far above the planet can provide only limited insight on ground conditions because most forms of light cannot penetrate the dense atmosphere..\", the author says \"maybe we should think of them as challenges\" to which he adds that researchers are already looking up solutions \" Many researchers are working on innovations that would allow our machines to last long enough to contribute meaningfully to our knowledge of Venus.\"\n\nWith all of the challenges that NASA is going to have to face you can't help but to agree the possibilty of studying Venus more indebth is a good idea. The author of this article has given some strong irrefusible points that suggest studying Venus is worth the risks due to the possiblity of Venus being used to benefit us in the future.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Im going to tell you if the facial action coding system is a good or bad idea. First the process begins when the computer constructs a 3-D computer model of the face; all 44 major muscles in the model must move like human muscles. Movement of one or more muscles is called an action unit. Then Dr. Huang relies on the work of psychologists, such as Dr. Paul Eckman, creator of FACS (Facial Action Coding System). Eckman has classified six basic emotions happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness and then associated each with characteristic movements of the facial muscles.\n\nThe facial expressions for each emotion are universal, observes Dr. Huang, even though individuals often show varying degrees of expression (like not smiling as broadly). Using video imagery, the new emotion-recognition software tracks these facial movements in a real face or in the painted face of Mona Lisa. By weighting the different units, the software can even identify mixed emotions (as in da Vincis masterpiece). Each expression is compared against a neutral face (showing no emotion).\n\nIn fact, we humans perform this same impressive calculation every day. For instance, you can probably tell how a friend is feeling simply by the look on her face. Of course, most of us would have trouble actually describing each facial trait that conveys happy, worried, etc.\n\nYet Dr. Huang observes that artists such as da Vinci studied human anatomy to help them paint facial muscles precisely enough to convey specific emotions. His new computer software stores similar anatomical information as electronic code.\n\nThe Mona Lisa demonstration is really intended to bring a smile to your face, while it shows just how much this computer can do. Imagine a computer that knows when youre happy or sad. For example, if you smile when a Web ad appears on your screen, a similar ad might follow. But if you frown, the next ad will be different. A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored, Dr. Huang predicts. Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor. The same technology can make computer-animated faces more expressive for video games or video surgery. Most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication, notes Dr. Huang. So computers need to understand that, too.\n\nIn conclusion the technology to read peoples facial expressions is a great idea because the computer could help students out if they dont understand the work just by reading there faces. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Smog, acid rain, high carbondioxide levles, all of these things are due to pollution. In many contries the leaders have put a ban towards cars. Paris France, Vauban Germany, Bogota Colombia, and even the United States of America have/are thinking about putting a ban on cars or other transporting objects. Their are many advantages to limiting car usage; limiting pollutians in the air, saving money, and having a healthier life style.\n\nCars can cost a pretty penny espically if their new, and many low/middle class family's have trouble keeping up with the bills that come with a car. Car payments alone can run up to $300 a month. Then theirs insurance, and if your car happends to need a change of oil, or breaks theirs another 200-300 dollar payment. That's why people are starting to buy fewer and fewer cars each year. After the peek in 2005 car percheses have droped tramendiously, with less people deciding to get a license.\n\nNot getting you license dosn't mean you cant get around, it just means that you have to find other means of transprotatin. Biking, walking, even riding on your skateboard can get you from point A to point B. Cars are bigining to become obsoliet, not being used in larg suberbs, or highly populated cities. People have started to walk to work and that has a large impact on health. With people having privet cars they dont feel the need to have phisical activity every day. This could be contrabuting to obeasity. With cars being out of mind people are starting to get exersize just by walking to work. Cars have also contrabuted to many deaths all over the world. With new technology comming out many drivers get distracted. Wether its talking on their phones, trying to pick up something thats' dropped in the back seat, or even trying to dig something out of your purse. Not all drivers are a fault tho, many other accidents happen because of padestrians not paying attention. These accidents could be prevented though, by just getting rid of the use of cars.\n\nPassenger cars cause 12% of greenhouse gass admitions in europe, and up to 50% in some car-intensive areas in the Unites States. If we got rid of most privetly owned cars though, it world bring that pecentige down tramendously. In Paris the record high pollution finally had them pass a partial driving ban untill the thick smog cleard the city streets. congestion was down 60% in the streets of paris, and after 5 days of intensifying smog it had finally cleard.\n\nCars all over the world are slowly becoming less and less used. This could help the pollution, health and save money. these advantiges to getting rid of cars is going to become a topic thast we will talk alot about for ages, until cars become compleetly and totaly obsolite. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Luke didn't know what his life would be like after graduating High School. He worked two part-time jobs in a grocery store and a bank.Until his friend Don invited him to Europe on a cattle boat. Luke couldn't say no becuse it was a opportunity of a lifetime.In 1945 world War ll was over in Europe, and many countries were ruined.\n\nTo help those countries recover food suplies, animals, and more, 44 nations joined together to form UNRRA (the United Nations relief and Rehabilitation Administration .) UNRRA had hired \"Seagoing Cowboys\" to take care of the horses, young cows, and mules that had been shipped overseas. Luke and Don signed up.\n\nIn August 1945, they received their orders to report to New Orleans. \"They arrived August 14\", Luke said, \"the day the Pacific war ended.\" They got their seaman's papers and boarded the SS Charles W. Wooster headed for Greece with a cargo of 335 horses plus enough hay and oats to feed them.\n\nBefore arriving in Greece Luke turned 18, so now he could be drafted for military service. \"When Luke's draft board learned that he was on a cattle-boat trip, they told him just to keep doing that service for me.\"\n\nBy\n\nthe time he was discharged in 1947, Luke had my nine trips the, the most of any Seagoing Cowboy. \"The cattle-boat trips were an unbelievable opportunity for a small-town boy\", he says, But being a Seagoing Cowboy was much more than an adventure for Luke Bomberger. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Human curiosity can make a human seem crazy but the author in 'The challenge of exploring venus' wasn't crazy for thinking we should study and go to venus because he knows how dangerous it is. But he's got alot of facts of how we can cope with the dangers he gives us facts about venus such as the weather and how it looks and the conditions of venus. Venus is so much like earth in size and density and the closest in distance. Humans have sent many many spacecrafts to venus but many had not made it or were only good for a couple of hours so people's suggestion was to use old compters from world war 2. But these devices make calculations by using gears and levers and do not reuire electrons at all. Modern computers are enormously poweful,flexible and quick, but they tend to be delicate when it coes to extreme physical conditions but compared to a smart phone the systems that use mechanical parts can be more resistant to heat. Pressure and other forcers in the passage the author states that astronomers are fascinated by venus because it may well once have been the most earth-like planet in our solar system. long ago, Venus was most likley covered largley with oceans and could have supported different types of life form just like earth venus has some features that are analogous to those on earth.The planet has such valleys,moutains and craters. Scientist seeking to conduct a thorough mission to understand vens would need to get up close despite the risk but some see it as a challenge. The reason it's such a challenge is because a thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets venus. even more challenging are the clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in venus's atmosphereon the planet's surface temperatures average 800 degrees fahrenheit. Compared to earth is 90 times greater than what we experience on earth.\n\nThese were the facts that supported this artical. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Yes, the Electoral College Works because in source one it tells the reader the steps you have to take in order to be able to work. For example in paragraph five it states how each candidate running for president has his or her own group of electors. It also states that the electors generally chosen by the candidate's political party, but some state laws vary on how electors are selected and for what there responsibilities are.\n\nIt is a hard process to go through in order to be a candidate and get voted to be president because people have the right to choose who they want and why they want the person to be president. Some reasons why people want the person to be president are because of the things there going to do like make the country better or improve the government while they are in charge for four years. Reasons why they might not want to choose the person as a president could be because of many reasons. Source two states how some voters do not vote for the president but vote for the slate of the electors who in turn have to elect the president.\n\nSource three mainly talks about the five reasons to keep our methods of choosing the president. A good example is how in the catogory certainty of outcome it states that president Obama recieved 61.7 percent of the elctoral vote compared to only 51.3 percent of the popular votes casted for him and Mitt Romney. Most voters that end up in swing states are more likely to pay close attention to the campaign as it states in paragraph twenty. But, big states lose virtue by population. For example Obama who won the vote only got twenty nine electoral votes out of the state of Florida. In Wyoming he only got three electoral votes so this means that larger states get payed more attention than the smaller states do.\n\nIn conclusion the Electoral College does work but, it all depends the how many people vote in each state and how many the electors decide to vote. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I agree with the project for these cars, I would love to live in a future where i could call a car from anywhere and it would come ready to take me to my destination. Imagine the time people would be saving if the place they are supposed to be would automaticaly be known to the car and it could just take you. Of course everyone would have to test it out and make sure its safe enough but after that part the cars will be a huge breakthrough in our technology.\n\nI feel if they are going to make these types of cars they should take all the time they need to make sure its working right so no accidents happen. if we all had cars that moved for us and knew the surroundings then there would be less car crashes and accidents.\n\nIf these cars were made then we could solve most of the problem of car crashes, they could even go as far as to make a solar powerd back up so if the car ever runs out of fuel it could switch to the suns energy. in conclusion these cars are a step towards a better future. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Our travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation.(NASA) has one particularly compelling idea for sending humans to study Venus. NASA’s possible solution to the hostile conditions on the surface of Venus would allow scientists to float above the fray. Imagine a blimp-like vehicle hovering 30 or so miles above the roiling Venusian landscape.\n\nStriving to meet the challenge presented by Venus has value, not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also because human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors. Our travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation.some simplified electronics made of silicon carbide have been tested in a chamber simulating the chaos of Venus’s surface and have lasted for three weeks in such conditions. Another project is looking back to an old technology called mechanical computers.\n\nTherefore, scientists seeking to conduct a thorough mission to understand Venus would need to get up close and personal despite the risks. Or maybe we should think of them as challenges. Many researchers are working on innovations that would allow our machines to last long enough to contribute meaningfully to our knowledge of Venus. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Technology to read emotional expressions is a pretty clever idea. Many people might support my claim or might not. This technology could help many teachers with their students. Students can also benfit from the new techonology. Teachers should be able to know how their students feel in their class. Techonlogy like this can help all around the world.\n\nThe use of the techonology to read emotional expressions of students in a classroom is indeed valuable and beneficial. The text conveys that \"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored\" this could help teachers in their class. It could help teachers because it would show them what to teach and how students are feeling in his/her class. Knowing how students feel about the class helps teachers in a profound way. The teacher would be able to know if her students are confused and in this way the teacher would be able to help the student become intreasted and focused on the subject the teacher is teaching. Students that ever are to afraid to ask questions during class will be able to recieve help whenever they have a question.\n\nThe Facial Action Coding System can probably become one of the most useful things all around the world if it is used properly. Students in a classroom will find this new techonlogy being presented very valuable. We will need in this technology in every classroom around the world. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The use of this technology to read students emotial expressions will be very valuable . The name of this software is called \" The Mona Lisa \" its really a facial action coding system .The software can recognize emotions . Most Humans preform the same impressive \" calculations \" everyday . The process of facial action coding is dfficult , the process begins when a computee constructs 3 -D computer models of the face ; all 44 major muscles must move just like human muscle's would . The movement of one or more muscles is called an \" action unit ' . Dr Huang and his colleague are experts at developing better ways for humans and computers to communicate with each other well .\n\nA quote by Dr Huang was \" The facial expressions for each emotion are universal , even though indidviduals often show varying degrees of expression \" . The Mona Lisa demonstration is really intended to bring a smile on people faces . Dr . Huang predicts\n\nA classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored . Moving your facial muscles not only expresses emotions , but also may even help produce them . Empathy may happen because we unconsciously inmitate another person's facial expressions . Lastly ,\n\nThe making Lona Lisa project was a good way to show how a computer can be used to identify human emotions , and that this resource of technology is very valauble to use to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom . ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "A Seagoing Cowboy's Journey\n\nImagine going to many sites that many people don't normally see and having mulitple adventures around the world. It is an unforrgetable experience that you don't want to miss. You should participate in the Seagoing Cowboys program becasue of the fun-filled games and freetime, helping the struggling individuals and families, and seeing the unquie sites.\n\nFirst of all, having some freetime and playing some games onboard is simply a time to relax and enjoy the great experience. Many of you may say that the games don't matter. You just want to travel the world and save as much people as possible. Even though that may be true, I belive that the games benefit in many ways, like making new friends and just having some tine to relax. The cowboys and I have played baseball and volleyball in some empty holds where animals have been housed. Other things to do in your freetime could be reading, boxing, whittling, table-tennis, fencing, and so much more! It has helped me have a better time onboard.\n\nSecondly, helping struggling individuals and families make you feel joyous inside. Some people may say that you don't want to help as many people and go enjoy the amazing sites and play games with fellow companions. And, helping people is really dangerous. But, I belive that if you do, it can make you a better person inside and out. And it doesn't just have to be people either; it can be animals too. Caring for the animals on the way to China kept me busy which was a good benefit because the trip to China took about a month. They had to be fed and watered two to three times a day. It helped me be more responsable and hard working. As for the struugling people, I helped people recover their food supplies, animals and more. The benefits were that same as those with the animals. The knowladge of helping someone or something is one of the best feelings in the world.\n\nLastly, touring the sites was the best thing for me to experience. Multiple people might say that they don't care about the sights and they just want to do something else. But, I believe that if I didn't see those wonderful sights, I wouldn't be determined or encouraged to finish my job as a Seagoing Cowboy. It was an unbeliveable opportunity for me and it will be for you. I was able to see Europe and China! Two things that were special to me were seeing the Acropolis in Greece and taking a gondola ride in Venice, Italy. In Italy, many of the streets are water, which made my experience to Italty even more exciting. On the way to China, I also marveled at the Panama Canal and toured an excavated castle in Crete.\n\nIn conclusion, you should participate in the Seagoing Cowboys program because of the fun-filled games and freetime, helping the struggling individuals and families, and finally, exploring the unquie and wonderful sights around the world. I am very grateful for the amazing opportunity and it made me more aware of people and their countire's needs. You should think about participating in the Seagoing Cowboys program today! ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driving cars may seem like the best way to get from point A to point B, and in many ways, it is. Cars are fast, they are comfortable, and they can fit mulitple people. The auto industry is big because of these factors. Though studies show that cars, may not be the best option for the enviroment; and therefore, ourselves.\n\nThere is a city in Germany, Vauban. This city is almost completely devoid of cars. How do they do it? Well most of them ride bikes, or simply walk. If there is a distance to far for biking or walking, there is also a tram that runs through the city. The people who live in this city seem to be incredibly happy \"When I had a car I was always tense. I'm much happier now\"\n\n(Source 1)\n\nsays Heidrum Walter, citizen of Vauban. This trend of seperation from automobiles is happening not only in europe, but everywhere in the world. The EPA is advocating \"car reduced communities\" in the United States. The world is changing \"All of our development since World War II has been centered on the car, and that will have to change\"\n\n(Source 1)\n\nThe beneifit of going car-free, goes beyond making people happier, it might even save the human race. Global warming is a major problem. Though an even bigger problem, is that most people in the US do not believe that global warming even exists. One way that scientists know that global warming is happening, is by looking in the ice of the artic. By drilling deep holes in the artic, scientists can extract tubes of ice millions of years old. Just how you can tell how old a tree is by counting its rings, you can tell how old ice is by doing the same thing. When scientists tested the amount of Co2 in a sample of ice that was formed 50 years after the industrial revolution, then compared it to the level of Co2 in a tube of ice 50 years before the industrial revolution. They saw a remarkable increase in Co2 levels after the industrial revolution. Many people do not know, but mercury looked a lot like earth a billion or so years ago. Now mercury is a desolated wasteland, thanks to the amount of volcanos spewing Co2 into the atmosphere. A similar phenomena is happening all over the world in places like Paris and China. Paris' pollution was so bad, that they had to ban driving for a couple days \"On Monday motorists with even-numbered license plates were ordered to leave their cars at home or suffer a 22-euro fine\"\n\n(Source 2)\n\nIn Bagota, Columbia, people take part in a car-free day in order to reduce smog. \"Millions of Columbians hiked, biked, skated, or took buses to work during a car-free day yesterday\"\n\n(Source 3)\n\nThis is another example of people taking the initiative to give up cars, even if its only for one day.\n\nPeople are finally staring to realize that cars cause pollution to the Earth. Even the president is backing the cause, which honestly might be why more people have not accepted global warming as a fact. The level of driving has decreased over the years \"As of April 2013, the number of miles driven per person was nearly 9 percent below the peak and equal to where the country was in January 1995\"\n\n(Source 4)\n\nIt is fantastic to know that people are finally embracing science as something to learn from, and not something to fear. What we all need to realize is that, our planet will live on millions of years after we are gone. We are not saving our planet by preventing global warming, we are saving ourselves. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Are you interested in taking care of animals? Do you like going on boats out in the sea? If both of your answers are yes then you should be a seagoing cowboy. A seagoing cowboy is a person who goes onto a boat and takes care of the animals on the boat.\n\nI think that you should particapate in the Seagoing Cowboys Program because you could explore all of the oceans. Also you could see Europe and many other countries. You could help all of the people that need food supplies, animals, and more. To support this in the text it says \"Besides helping people, I had the side benefit of seeing Europe and China. But seeing the Acropolis in Greece was special,\"\n\nAlso I think that you should join the Seagoing Cowboys Program beause it was an oppurtinity to have fun on board. I know this because in the text it says \"Luke also found time to have fun on board, especially on return trips after the animals had been unloaded. The cowboys played baseball and volleyball games in the empty holds where animals had been housed.\n\nTo conclude, I think that you should join the Seagoing Cowboys because you get the oppurtunity to explore all kinds of countries. Also I think that you should join the Seagoing Cowboys Prgram because you got to have fun on board playing all kinds of different games to past the time. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Luke's point of view makes others want to join the Seagoing Cowboys program.The author discribes the time spent aboard the ship makes it sound fun. The author states things that Luke has said about the ship, they are mostly good things, too. The author also discribes how Luke feels on the ship also. Luke has dicribed the ship as a fun and interesting experiance.You get the chance to help people in need and help the community, too.\n\nThe first reason, that others want to particiapate. The way the participants spend their free time is time comsuming and fun. They would play games, have table-tennis tournaments, fencing, boxing, they would read and whittle, too. It also is a good way to use up any military service time that you owe. You also get to see passing contenents and countries such as Europe and China.You could aslo have the chance to explore or take tours around countries. It is also a good way to help out a community in need of help. You also get experiance taking care of animas and farming, like cleaning stalls and carring bales of hey. There are also some dangers of being at sea, like falling overboard and bad storms that ocurr over seas. But most of the time you are safe.\n\nIn conclusion, joining the Seagoing Cowboys is a good way to use military service, have some fun , see other countries and contenents, and see other cultures. Luke's good deeds took effect to his family too. His family hosts internatinoal students and exchange visitors for many years now. The Seagoing Cowboys is a very busy program, but they do find ways to have fun. Joining the Seagoing Cowboys is a way to feel good about yourself and what you are doing for your communtity and other's community.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "What I think is that when the planet was moving the planet ended up making the face but it is just part of Mars.I dont think that aliens had something to do with it.If people think that aliens had something to do with it then why have we not went to go find out more about the object.The object is just part of the planet that was made when the plant was moving and it is just a butte or mesa made by the plant not aleins.Aleins had nothing to do with this object it was just something that was made by Mars and Mars only.\n\nIf we are going to say that the object was made by aliens then we need more evdince not just that one object because one object doesnt mean anyhting with out more things but the planet is able to form something just buy when it is moving and that we have evedince on that but we dont have evedince that an alein made that object and we wont know until we can find more objects just like this one,until then we just know that Mars made this object that NASA found.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Making Monta Lisa Smile\" by Nick D' Alto that how was describe for Facial Action Coding System of her varierty of her industries, I will mention there names, how they process with the computer , emotion or expression and the diffeneces musles.\n\nThat Monta Lisa was 83 percenthappy, 9 percent disgusted, 6 percent fearful, and 2 percent angry becuase of the some new computer recognize her emotions. Dr. Huang has his colleague are expeert to better ways humans and computers to communicate. That pretty cool but how possible, I beleif we got some question we want to know how so.\n\nThe process begins when the computers contrust with the 3-D that a model of the faces that can cause the major muhumanbs musckles. About the Dr. Hunag relies the work he had as being psychologist woth the Dr. Paul, the one creator with the FACS meaning Facial Action Coding System. To mention about the Monta Lisa classified her saix basic empotion she has: happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear and sadness bceuase of charactersitc movements of her facial muslces. Dr. Huang try to imagery the new emotiuon recognition softwre tracks these facil movement in the real face of painted\n\nMona Lisa. By using the wieghting the different units that can varitry her emotions.\n\nTo studied human to help them paint facial muscles precisly enough to convey the emotion to see hpw Mona Lisa smiles. For Dr. Huang has his computer software to inform as electroic code to the emotion sort of Da Vinci Code.\n\nOverall that Mona Lisa was a demonstration to bring her smile to her face while it show on them computrer can do the process it to know if she sad or happy. Empathy may happen becauyse we unconsciusly imitate another person facil expressions. This was a scinece of emotion of human can relatives vs Mona Lisa smile all the time for 83 pecrent that no one can becuse of there ecmotional. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the artical \"Making Mona Lisa Smile\" it talks about how a new form of technology that can read human emotions was used to read the emotions of the Mona Lisa could be used to read other human emotions. Dr. Huang, from Beckman institute worked on the computer with other scientis. the computer was programed to read the expresions of humans by first making a 3D model of the face, along with all 44 major muscels in the face too.\n\nHow this would be valuable in the classroom. well it argues in ther artical how if this technology was available in all classrooms that this would ba able to help students learn in their own way or how the computer would be able to recognize the emotions that the student is expressing and would be able to change or modify the lesson for the sudent. if this sort of technology was available it would change the whole outlook on how we learn and change the whole outlook on the classroom. it would give students a better chance of learning and help how they learn,it would make each lesson personal to each student.\n\nIf this form of technology was made available then they major impact that it would have on schools and on students would be so grand that it would cahnge the face of learning. so therefor i do belive that the use of this technology is valuable in a classroom.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Driverless people can cause problems. Many People dies in car accident. People have to follow rules, so they can survive. If the cars is on over speed, then it can cause big accident and lot of people can died. The Driverless people can cause, accident like in traffic jam, death , like car is on over speed, and safety is important like drive in speed limit, and follow rules.\n\nThe First Thing is Accident. People don't wear the seat belts if they don't, then it can cause big problem , people have to wear seat belts. Another thing is Deaths, some people's dont the rules, sometime they drink and drive, if they sleep while driving it can hit somebody.\n\nThe Second Thing is Death. The Bridges, if the bridges are week, then it will break, so don;t drive on the week bridges. Another thing is that people like to drive fast and they just drive in the red light. One more thing is traffic jam, in traffic jam people like to hurry, so they hit on another cars.\n\nThe Third Thing is Safety. People can safe their life by drive slowly or drive in the speed limit. People neet to follow rules like wear seat belt and don't drink and drive, and it help him and others. Another thing is don't break singnels, if they did, then the police will catch you and give you ticket for breaking rules, so always follow rules and it will cause less deaths and accidents.\n\nSo, the people always have to follow rules, so it dosen't hurt other peoples and you. While you driving don't you phone or other thing, if you do you can lose your constrate from road. The Driverless people can cause, accident like in traffic jam, death , like car is on over speed, and safety is important like drive in speed limit, and follow rules.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "There is alot of things you could say about driverless cars but in my oppion he should be alout on the roads. Yes it could be dangerious but it could also be a good idea. It says i the text that it cant go around work zones or accidents,but it will notify they driver when aproching to tell them they need to take the wheel. it also states that the cars themselves have a lot of safty structures in them like cameras and the seats vibrate when the vehicle is in danger of backing into something. there are some states that dont alow these driverless cars, but manufacturers believe that more states will follow as soon as the cars are proved more reliably safe.automakers are continuing their work on the assumption thatthe problems to come will be solved some car companys say\n\nthey will be relising a self driving car in the near fucture.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think you should not keep the Electoral College. We as people, should be able to pick who we want. The Electoral College keeps us from doing so. They are choosing for us that's not fair.\n\nIn source 3, it says that Gore had the popular votes, but Bush had the electoral votes so he won. If presidency was given to Gore it would be fair. We lost a chance to have a different president.\n\nWith the Electoral College all we are doing is voting the slate of electors, and they are voting for the president. We should be the ones who actually vote. Some of us, people forget the Electoral College and think we are the ones voting in reality we are the popular votes which dosent count as much as electoral votes. It should be the opposite.\n\nIn conclusion, we should get rid of the Electoral College, and let the people vote for they would like to vote for. We should not have someone vote for us, that's really all the Electoral College is doing. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Well in source 4 i think kids are getting few licenses because there droping out of school and hav no money and smoke to much and to many different type of drugs. now dont get me wrong not all kids a like thhis but a good 40% are like this. the thing is the people spend to much time in the car there should be a car limmit like more joy rideing for more than an hour or no just driving to drive because you want to. the world need the learn how to put things in moderation. the world today is to codependent we need to be more independent i mean less pointless use or cars or buying and using things we dont need. like more car the more cars we buy the fast the air will thin and so many bad thing will come from that. to make a car free day it would cost the USA more money to have a car free day that to find scientist and try the find a better way of using fuels so what i am saying is unless you get every one here to start hating driving it wont be a car free day ever in the USA.\n\nin the world they need to have one whole day car free i do agree i just really dont think it is posibale to get it to happen to many people work to far from home and need to travel for work.\n\n???OK BYE NOW??? ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I bet your wondering what a Electoral college is in your head ,\n\nwell an Electoral college is not somewhere you go to like a regular college but its a process ,\n\nthey established it in constitution as a compromise.\n\nIts where they vote for presidents and vice president including the electoral votes by congress ,\n\nElectoral college consists 538 electors and the majority of 270 electoral votes to elect the president .\n\nTo begin with, every candidate is running for President for your state ,and each of them has their own electors .\n\nAfter every four years presidential election is held on tuesday after the first monday ,\n\nthe fun part is that most states gets a \"winner-take-all\" system that awards all the electors to the winning presidential candidate ,\n\nalso your governer prepares a \"Certificate of Ascertainment\"\n\nlisting all the wonderful candidates who ran for President in your state along with the names of their respective electors .\n\nThis year most voters are expecting another close election in the population vote which winners could again lose the presidency.\n\nUnder electoral college system some voters don't vote for presidents but vote for a state of electors , if you lived in texas for an example and wanted to vote for someone named John kerry you would vote for a slate of 34 Democratic electors pledged to Kerry .\n\nFor the winner-take-all method of the award electoral votes induces the candidates just like in 2012 election .Obama won the vote and got 29 electoral votes ,a large state gets more attention from presidential candidates in the campaign\n\nNixton in 1968 and Clinton in 1992 both had a 43 pecent plurality of popular votes .\n\nBut hopefully you learned about the Electoral College and what it really is ,and what the electors have to go through to be president. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Facial Action Coding System\n\nFacial Action Coding System is valuable to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom because it tells you six basic emotions. Which are happiness, suprise, anger, disgust, fear and sadness. This technology will be able to tell how students are doing at school or in there daily lives. It can let other people be aware what they need in order to live a good life. This system can reveal so much about the science of emotions.\n\nAnother thing is that according to the Facial Feedback Theory of Emotion, moving your facial muscles not only expresses emotions, but also may even help produce them. Like for example ''putting on a happy face'' actually works! In the article it states that ''A reowned drama coach, Constantin Stanislavsky, had his actors carefully reproduce smiling and frowning as a way of creating these emotions on stage''. Empathy may happen because we unconsciously imitate another person's facial expressions. Thats why this technology will be useful cause in the article they showed an example of when you are looking in the mirror you have to do an expression.\n\nFollowing that being said it asks you if it suggests an emotion. These are the instructions for a face that looks happy. It's all about those muscular action units. It can even indicate the difference between a genuine smile and a forced one. When it comes to experts , faces don't lie; these muscle clues are sometimes used to spot when a ''smiling'' politican or celebrity isn't being truthful.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Just A Natural Landform\n\nThe Face has been to be called many things but its pretty clear that it is just a natural landform. If it was really made by aliens would't there be proof of actual aliens? Yeah there should be but there is no proof of aliens, so that is just more proof that the face is just a natural landform. There are many rocky parts on Mars and the face is just one of them people are over thinging it when all it is a pices of land.\n\nTwentry- five years ago NASA's Viking 1 discovered a shadowy figuer that looked like a human face. The thing that set off the people the most was the shadowness that formed a illuison of a face. Then when the face was released to the world everyone though that it had something to do with aliens. Peolpe started to but the face in movies, magazines, make it in a book,and people would talk about it on the radio.\n\nVery few scientist think that it was a alien which i dont think it is a alien. Then NASA sent Mars Global Surveyor to retreve more photos of the face. The pictures they retreved clearly showed that theface was just a natural landform. Think about it the pictures that were taking back in 1976 the technology wasn't great and then when they retook photos in 1998 they were so much clearer. The technology obviously inhasted over that long period of time.\n\nBut people were still not convinced so they went to take another look in 2001 and the picture was even better. People want to think aliens are real but they aren't and this so called face is has nothing to do with them. If NASA were to take more photoes of it today there would be no one who thinks its a alien. Today's technology doen't even compare to the technology they had when they took the last pictures of the face, but people are going to believe what they want.\n\nAll the facts clearly state that the face is just a natural landform. In the beginning when the face was first discovered people though it was a hard fact about aliens ,but technology got better and we could see it better to tell that it was just land. it is really clear to me that all it is a natural landform. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear State Senator,\n\nHave you ever sent your vote to where its is in the hands of other people not knowing what is going to happen to it like is it going to be counted for the person you want it to, or it could be for the person you really do not want to win. Well that is called an electoral college. It in my opinion is not a very good system because, you don't always get to vote for who you want to.\n\nI believe that we as individuals have the right to choose what we want in a leader. I do not believe Electoral College. For the simple fact, we do not always get to vote for who we want to run our country. The people of America have their own beliefs and own opinion and when it comes down to where we have to choose the person who will be running our country for four consecutive years we will vote for the one we believe that will not hurt our beautiful country. But if we did choose the Electoral College and I wanted to vote for John McCain for instance, and is sent it in and now your vote is in the hands of other people now you don't know if your vote is gonna be for John McCain or Barak Obama. Therefore I do not like or consider anyone using the Electoral Collage.\n\nBy using the popular vote you are guaranteed the vote you wanted. You don't have to worry if you vote got changed or not. You popular vote is what you wanted to choose and no one could change that\n\nSo I think I speak for the people when I say lets do away with the Electoral College and just use the popular votes.\n\n-Thank You\n\nA Concerned Voter ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "How important is a persons car to them? Do they really need to have their own car? It would be more eco-friendly if they just car pooled, or even walked. It seems this question has occured to a lot of people in high places. These people then used their positions to ban cars in many busy cities, with marvelous results.\n\nSome where in Germany, there's a social experiment going on. This experiment is taking place in a small suburbian town called Vauban. The people in this community have taken a huge leap of faith and got rid of all cars. But don't worry, they couldn't be happier. Their streets are nearly empty with virtually no traffic, they have less stress, and they don't have to worry about all the expenses that come with car ownership. The streets are very close together with stores on pratically every corner, to prevent having to go long distances. All they have to do is take a nice stroll down main street and have everything at their fingertips. They don't have to worry about people parking on their front lawns, or people flying dangerously fast down the street. It's just simple and easy.\n\nGranted, having a car availible does have benefits. Owning a car can give people a sense of freedom. It's like a reassurance that no matter what, people have the means to get something done. Without having to depend on others. If there's an emergency, people don't want to have to wait for the next bus to come through. They want to get there as quickly as possible. Owning a car makes that possible. Owning a car can also make visiting that aunt that lives three states away possible. Without having to ride a cramped, smelly bus to get there.\n\nOn the other hand, going without a car certainly has more pros than cons. There's less stress, it's cheaper, there's less traffic, it's healthier, and there's less pollution. For instance, in Paris, there was so much smog, they had to ban cars. If people violated the ban they had to pay a fine, or even get their car impounded. They blamed diesel fuel for the smog, because in France, that's nearly 67 percent of cars fuel. The cities' smog rivaled Bejings', and that's the most polluted city in the world! Going without a car is also less stressful. People don't have to worry about how they'll make the next car payment, or how they might run out of gas. There's also virtually no chance of getting in an accident. Afterall, how is someone going to get in an accident without a car?\n\nNot only is going without a car the better economical choice, its the best personal choice. Why would someone deliberately put themsleves through the stress of owning a car, when they can easily go without? Though it has some benefits, like being independent, those benefits are greatly outnumbered by the pros of going without. It's just cheaper and less stressful. Who wouldn't want that? ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Hello i am Albert , In my opion i do not think driveless cars are a good thing at all i feel like they will be a ton of more car crashes and that there is to much money to be made when we have biigger issues in the world. A driverless car is no use we have been doing just fine for years already why change something that doesnt need to be changed ? It would be cool and all but as a person i am i wouldnt put my life in a cars hand because anything is possible and anything can happend outta of the blue. I like driving also so its not a big deal but people that dont like driving i see there point but also woud you putyour life and others at risk i wouldnt also thinking that this car can have a mis manfacture and crash orjust the system shuts down .\n\nIs enough for me to not even wanan get inside a car like that. It might save us alot of things but i think of it as it will cost alot of things also and can hurt people so thats why i wouldnt suggest a driverless car no need for it i my opion but people will do as they plesase this is all my opions and how i feel.\n\nSincely,Albert", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Challenge of Exploring Venus. This unhospitable planet is 2nd from the sun. Still being a safe distance away from Earth. It is a very challenging place to examine closely.\n\nVenus being the closest planet to Earth. It has several simularities, size and desity. Also occasionally the closest in distance depend on the orbit. Mars on the other hand alot like Venus orbit at different speeds. Meaning some times Earth is closest to Mars, or Venus depending in the orbit.\n\nMany times people have tried to land on Venus. Only suruving a few hours prior of the launch. Not a single spacecraft has touched down on Venus in more than 3 decades.\n\nNot only is is hard to survive just getting there. It would be hard living on it also. A thick atmosphere of 97% Carbon Dioxide is around Venus. Making it even more challenging, the clouds have a high corrosive sulfuric acid in the atmosphere. Tempratures average over 800 degrees Fahrnheit. The atmosperic pressure is 90x greater than here on Earth. These conditions are far more extreme from anything humans can experiense on Earth. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "People say this giant face like montain is from nature, some say its an arifact from an ancient civilization on mars . What do i think? I think it's just mother nature at her best. I will explain to you why i believe so.\n\nAs shown in paragraphs 2 and 3, Martian mesa's are very common around the area of the \"face\". And that its not really a face but really its sort of like an illusion ,because of the shadowing at the eyes, nose, and mouth. sure there are huge posiblities that this face can be an artifact ,but we have no proof.\n\nIn 1998 when scientist sent a probe back to mars, they had no evidence of\n\n\"The Face\" being an ancient artifact. But, through out the whole passage they never gave us any factual detail of this face on mars suface is an actual artifact or not ,so until scientist actually give us proof on anything, the world may never know until that day. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article \"Making Mona Lisa Smile\" by Nick D'Alto, technology called the Facial Action Coding System enables computers to identify human emotions. The use of this technology should be used in schools to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom because being able to identify what might be bothering others could be beneficial. Young adults could be facing something serious in their life but may not have the right words to express how they feel. Finding help for those feeling down is difficult. Using this technology could help those in need. This technology can help with identifying if a student is happy or worried, being able to have fun and put a smile on a students face while using this technology, and being able to identify if a student is confused or bored.\n\nThe Facial Action Coding System can help with students and their emotions. \"Of course, most students would have trouble actually describing each facial trait that conveys happy, worried, etc.\" (5). Not everyone can tell what an individual is feeling. The help of this technology can help those who need it most. It can help detect if a student is happy or worried, but it can also put a smile on someones face.\n\nUsing this technology can help put a smile on your face in many ways. \"The Mona Lisa demonstration is really intended to bring a smile to your face.\" (6). A lot of technology used today can put a smile on someone's face. Video games, social media, etc. Using the Facial Action Coding System is beneficial in many ways as well. It can help with being productive, getting help for a student who might need it. Technology can help with putting a smile on a students face, but it can also help with identifying if a student is confused or bored.\n\nTechnology can help identify if a student is confused or bored and could also help them for later in the future. \"'A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored,\" Dr. Huang predicts. \"Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.'\" (6). Being able to identify a students emotions in a school could possibly help the student with getting better grades, feeling better about themselves, and passing each day with positivity. It can be difficult for a student to explain how they feel to another. The Facial Action Coding System has multiple ways on finding a solution for many problems that students are faced with today. This technology can help detect if a student is confused or bored, if a student is happy or worried, and being able to have fun with this technology.\n\nToday, many students are faced with difficult times. Students have to deal with so much during their schooling years and having difficult emotions to deal with also. The Facial Action Coding System could be very benificial to students and others. It can help with the problems that might hold them back from doing their best in school. This technology could help identify a student who is happy or worried, being able to have fun while using this technology, and being able to identify if a student is confused or bored. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" the author suggests that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents.\n\nIn the story the author supports his/her idea by saying \"On the planets surface, temperatures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet.\" This helps support the claim because the author is talking about the dangerous heat that people would experience on Venus.\n\nThe author also supports the claim by stating in paragraph two that\n\n\"Numerous factors contribute to Venus's reputation as a challenging planet for humans to study, despite its proximity to us.\" This also supports the authors claim becuase he/she is saying that Venus is a challenging planet to study.\n\nIn the text the author also states \"While Venus is simple to see from the distant but safe vantage point of earth, it has proved a very challenging place to examine more closely.\" This supports the claim because the author is saying that you cannot examine Venus more closely because it is challenging and dangerous.\n\nThese claims help evaulate how well the author supported his claim because they explain why Venus is dangerous and challenging to go explore. They also help evaulate how well the author did by giving good examples on why the author said what they said. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Have you ever wondered about Venus? This planet is somthing that we as humans haven't figured out yet. We are facing the challenge of Venus, it is really valued not only because of the facts and information we get out of this planet. Instead, humans are curiose and looking for more evidence of what we are going to face in the futur. We should learn more not only on the outter shell, but more deeply in the inside.\n\nVenus is the second planet in the our solar system(Milkyway). Also ot is one of the brightest points in the sky at night. As the closest plant to Earth in terms of size, density, and distane. The surface of it is full with valleys, mountains, and craters. Not even one single spacecraft have reached to it before. 97 percent of the atmosphere is carbon dioxide, forming a blanket for the planet. This planet has the highest temperature in the whole entire Milkyway. NASA(National Aeronautics and Space Administration) have not stop sending spacecraft to land on Venus.\n\nIf we could lend on Venus later on in the generation, could there be any living organisum that lives on that plante? There could be a possible chance since Earth is not the only planet in space. There are more things tha we need to discover. You would never know if there are creatures like ous that have a abiliy to explore space. We should keep trying even if there is only a 0.0000001 chance.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Yes, it could be useful! It could be used to do a lot of good things. For example, we could use it to help us determine whether someone is lying or not during an interigation or in a court. However, in order or both of those to be accurate we would need to make some adjustments.\n\nNevertheless, the technology could be used to show how and when students in school become confused or bored with a subject, just like the author stated. It could also advance our understanding of how emotions work. The Mona Lisa, who we saw in the picture, looks like she has a weird cross between a smile and a frown. It is very fascinating how this all works. This can also tell us if celebrities and politicians are being truthful.\n\nIn conclusion, it could be very benifical to study this subject. It could further advance the science of the human face and emotions. Like the author said, who knew faces could reveal so much about our emotions.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author tries to explain about how Venus has evolve in the passed couple of years. It also says that Venus would be the Earth's twin only because is the most closest planet from Earth. It also says that Venus' atmosphere pressure is 90 times greater than what we had experience on our own planet Earth. Even NASA is working on studing Venus alot more. They simplified electronics made of silicon, also carbibe has been tested in a chamber simulating the chaos of Venus. Huh? are you saying this is kind of boring well no.\n\nit's basaclly about mechanicla parts that can be made more resistant to pressure,heat, and other force. (As it says on paragraph 7) Our government is making as much work as they can becasue that want matters. Wait no venus is what matters because Venus is the next Earth. that's the 13 reason why ;) the government is focasing alot on venus. And I agree we should all agree becasue we are all a nation we breath the same air, evn tho we won't be breathing any air on Venus.\n\nBut things can get better as time goes by. I believe on the planet earth I think we should all appressiate what we have not what we get. because that could make you unhappy.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Do you own a car? Have you ever driven one? Many people would answer yes to these questions, and would agree that cars , in fact, are very useful. But have you ever thought of the adavantages that would occur if we limited car usage? While cars are very useful, they also have lots of negative side affects that come along with it. Cars accumulate lots of pollution in the enviroment and stress to humans. Also less cars, results in less traffic, which means you will be wasting less of you're life waiting to get somewhere and actually being there in the moment. Whether you realize it or not Americans are already starting to cut down on car uasge. In the article \"The End of Car Culture\" by Elisabeth Rosenthal, it even states \"recent studies suggest that Americans are buying fewer cars, driving less and getting fewer licenses as each year goes by.\"\n\nThe world has been struggling with pollution for quite some time now and has been trying to come up with ways to cut it down. So why not start with where it derives from the most? Cars. Pollution by cars got so bad in Paris that they had to use license plate numbers to decide what cars could drive on certain days! But what did happen was \"Congestion was down 60 percent in the capital of France, after five-days of intensifying smog.\" (Duffer). That is amazing! Just five days of less car usage and the smog went down 60 precent. Pollution would drop in great precentages if we just cut down car usage a bit. Pollution will always be harmful to the world, but steps should be taken to harm the world as little as possible.\n\nStress is something everyone experiences, but it is safe to say that everyone could do with less of it. Cars cause lots of stress to humans. A city in Germany does not allow cars and a women from the city says \"When I had a car I was always tense.\" (Rosenthal). She is much more relaxed now and does not need to worry about all the stress that comes along with owning a car. Another person from Bogota, Columbia, where they have a car-free day, says \"Its a good opportunity to take away stress...\" (Selsky). People all around the world are reporting that their lives are a lot less stress free when they do not own cars. Stress is something that can be very damaging to a human when in large amounts and just cutting down on driving takes away lots of that stress.\n\nEveryone has been stuck in traffic from time to time, and for some people in small cities, five minutes could be a long time to be stuck in traffic. But for some people in big cities like New York City and Los Angelos, people waste hours stuck in traffic! When you accumulate all those hours stuck in traffic, that is a lot of your time wasted in just waiting to get from desitination A, to destination B. Those hours could be spent on actually being there in the moment at the destination you want to be at. \"A study last year found that driving by young people decreased 23 percent between 2001 and 2009.....\" (Rosenthal), many people now-a-days just want to get to the place that they are going to, as fast as possible; whether that be by car-pooling, taking the bus, or biking. Car usage is already decreasing, but that advantage should be taken that people want to live in the moment more and car usage should be even more cut down.\n\nCar usage may never be completely taken away, but it defintley can be lowered. The advantages and benefits of just less car usage is astonishing. Less pollution to help the world, less stress to help the people, and letting people live life in the moment more are all advantages the derive from cutting down on the usage of cars. It may be diffcult to let go of something many people hold on to so dearest, but it is a change the will benefit us. While cars may have its pros, its cons outweigh it in the end. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "My position on driveless cars is that i feel like they would be useful but also unuseful at the same time. I feel that they hve lot of pros and aslo a lot of cons. They may be able to take you from A to B, but what about the cost of these cars?\n\nLets start on the pros. The car will be able to take you to A to B well you get relax. You can just sit back talk to a friend or even take a nap well the car takes you to your desired destination. The possibilities are endless with these driverless cars. There are also a lot of cons with these cars as well.\n\nNow with the cons. There are way to many cons to count. There endless. Lets say the car is driving to a far destination, how would the car know it needs gas? What if the car breaks down? How would we know that the car needs fixed? Plus theres so many parts that need to be added just to make the car \"drivelss\" that it would cost lots of money just to even add these parts. Replacing the parts would also cost a lot of money as well.\n\nLets say your driving down the street and one of the sensors on the car isent working and we dont know about it, the car would keep going and eventully crash into another car. Also in the article, it never talks about the car knowing weather theres a stop light or not.\n\nLets say you have a long day at work and youre tottally exahosusted, so you put the car on auto drive and let it do its thing well you take a nap. the car stops in the middle of the road trying to wake you up so you can drive the car manually, But no you are a heavy sleeper and another car hits you becouse you are a heavy sleeper.\n\nOnly a few states allow auto drivin moblils to be drivin in there borders. Wh so few? There dangroues thats why. These cars are unprdictible and take so many lives. As it says in paragraph 9 what if somebody does get hurts whos fault is it the drives or the manufacturer, it would have to be the manufature for not making the car as durible as it should be.\n\nWhich bring up the topic of these cars on how Durible are these cars? Yeah you can throw a camarea on top but what if the weather affects the camerea. Lets say it starts to hail, what if the camrea gets dameged by the hail and doesnt work any more? The cost to fix one of those would be outragious. To buy the car in general would cost way to money. All the parts and sensors would be mindblowing in price.\n\nAll in all yes its a intresting idea but its also a very bad one. The car is way to expenssive and is very unpredictible. Maybe in the future the could master making these cars and prove me wrong, but until then keep these things off the street. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I will be writting about \" The Challenges of Exploration Venus\". I will write about how to auther suggests that studying Venus is a worth pursuit despite the dangers it presents. I will also evaluate how well the auther supports his ideas. I will evaluate in a 1-10 scale. 1 being bad and 10 being the perfect.\n\nHis first idea was the name of the planet. He says that Venus is sometimes called \" Evening Star\". He supports his idea saying \" it is one of the brightest points of light in the night sky\". He also said \" this nickname is misleading since Venus is actually a planet\". I would evaluate this reason a solid 6 because he gave the little history behind the nickname but I feel like this reason was not the best.\n\nHis second idea is distance and looks. In the passege he said \"Venus is the closest planet to Earth in terms of density and size, and occasionaly the closest in distance to Earth too\". I would evaluate this reason a 4 because he did not give us enouph facts.\n\nHis third reason is spacecrafts and humans not landing in Venus. He supports this reason on saying \" each previous mission was unmanned, because no spacecrafts survived more than a few hours\". He also says that reason why no spaceships have touched down on Venus in decades is because \"Venus averages 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and the atmoshperic pressure is 90 times greater than on earth\". I would evaluate this reason a solid 8 because he gave us a reason and gave us stronge facts about the reason.\n\nIn conclusion I would say that the main of idea of the article was good. I would evaluate this idea or article a 9 out of 10 because I enjoyed reading the article. I feel like the auther had good reasons and supported them with facts and not opinons. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "my position in this is that i am pro self driving cars. our world is constantly changing, whether you like it or not. technology nowadays takes a huge part of our lives, even to the point that im taking an essay electronically at this moment! self driving cars, or even assisted cars, can drastically change the world we live in. many points can be brought up that are in this story, and others that i can say from on top of my head.\n\nfirst of all, is the safety of the driver/car. as the article points out, \"their cars have driven more than half a million miles without a crash\".\n\nas we all know, human error is a huge reason why cars crash. distractions, intoxicated, and lack of sleep are only a few reasons why it happens. looking on the other side, computers lack these problems. you'll never see a computer drunk driving, texting, or needing some sleep to relax. computers don't carry these human errors, which is a great thing. i believe the safety of a self automotive car is a great idea, and can save thousands or even millions of lives.\n\nsecondly, a driver would be able to relax and not have to deal with looking at the road. theres a point that the article points out, \"why would anyone want a driverless car that still needs a driver? wouldn't drivers get bored waiting for their turn to drive?\". think about though, WHY would a driver need to wait? using a family road trip as the setting, the driver can instead watch a movie, enjoy a good meal, or sleep. the article points out that the cars will be programmed to notify the driver that they'll need them to drive, and having someone in the passenger seat can help out in notifying him about the alert. theres no reason to wait, rather the driver can spend that time focusing on other things to do.\n\nfinally, this technology is inevitable. this isn't rather a pro as it is a con, but this is a thing thats just going to happen. no questions needed to ask. technology is reaching the point where its intelligience is up to par of a human, except lacking human error. tesla, google, mercedes, audi, nissan, and most likely hundreds of other car brands are working to make this reality. the question isnt if it'll happen, rather it is when. a self automotive car is just too perfect for it not to happen.\n\ni believe with all my heart, that self driving cars will become a thing. implementing this technology can be a high point of humanity, being able to show how far we have came. hopefully, in my lifetime, this will happen. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Cars have been in the world for a long time. Driverless cars should be used, because it is an efficiant way to go some place. In this article, it talks about how driverless cars has sensors that can inform the driver, \"There is something there!\" Also, the article talks about how BMW had developed the \"Traffic Jam Assistant\" which is helpful in many ways. Driverless cars should be used on the roads.\n\nThe sensors, the car uses, are different. Some examples on a Toyota Prius are position-estimating sensors on the left wheel, rotating sensor on the roof, a video camera mounted near the rearview mirror, four automative radar sensors, a GPS receiver, and an inertial motion sensor. They use those sensors to make a 3-D model of the car's surroundings, which can help the driver to see if there is any danger or obstacles the driver should avoid. If the developement of the car's sensors are improving, soon the car can avoid other obstacles without the help of a driver creating a driverless car and creating an environment where people don't need to worry about getting into car accidents or any of those sorts of disasters.\n\nThe \"Traffic Jam Assistant\", that BMW had developed in 2013, can handle driving at 25 mph with the driver still having his hands on the wheel. The car can steer, accelerate, and break themselves, but are designed to notify the driver if there is a road ahead that requires human skills. It is not completely to he point where can be driverless, but if they improve on this project and get the speed, where the car can handle driving at, to have more mph, then the car would drive on its own and the driver shouldn't worry about it.\n\nDriverless cars with the improved sensors and assistance is safer and more efficient. The improved sensors create an environment where people around the car won't have to worry about getting into car crashes or such disasters. The improved assistance wouldn't be called assistant anymore, it would be called driverless cars, because it can drive itself. If engineers keep improving and making progress, the driver wouldn't even be the driver, it would be a passenger. That is why driverless cars should be used on roads.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I dont agree with the agruement of driverless cars. One reason why i dont agree is that in the article it states \"they can steer, accelerate, and brake themselves, but all are designed to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skills, such as navigating through work zones and around accidents. This means the human driver must remain alert and be ready to take over when the situation requires.\" The reason why this isn't a reason why i would vote for a driverless car because if the driver falls asleep while driving, then the car would try interact with the driver and also dont know what to do in the situation.\n\nSelf driving cars ruins the car community of building, customizing, and also driving fast in the cars to show top acceleration. The car enthusits group want to be able to show their car to others and show their interest in cars. The self driving cars are going to take that from the car community.\n\nIn the article it states \"wouldnt drivers get bored waiting for their turn to drive?\" I agree with this statement because if there is a time period where people dont need to take over the car the human mind will be bored and try to find things to intertain themselves with. I believe that humans should be able to drive all the time. The only thing a smart car can do is show displays of how the driver surroundings are presented.\n\nThere are going to be numerous amount of problems when the car is presented. For example in the text it states \"If the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault-the driver or the manufacturer?\" This problem shows how the manufacturer failed to alert the driver of the problem going on with the car. Its not the driver fault for not being incontrol with the car. The car explained how it was going to alert the driver if it need human skill to help.\n\nInconclusion, this article about self driving cars is a dangerous task at hand. To refer back to the ninth paragraph, it shows how driving laws want to keep drivers, passengers, and pedestrians safe, but there is a probable chance of the technology failing.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "At a glace, \"The Face of Mars\" could be misunderstood as an alien artifact. The Scientists at NASA are more than sure it is nothing but a rock formation, an illusion caused by the the shadows it causes. The picture still bacame an icon over its false label however. For two and a half decades, people believed there were aliens outside of the atmosphere placing these on planets. It wasn't until a more clear camera came around that\n\nthe face really was shown.\n\nTo the dismay of many conspiracy theorists, the face is nothing more than a mesa. As Jim Gavin, cheief scientist of NASA's Mars Exploration Program calls it reminds him most of the \"Middle Butte in the Snake River Plain of Idaho.\" Not only are these rock formations common on Mars barren landscape, but also the living, breathing planet that is our home. Mesas are highly common on earth-this one on Mars just so happens to look like the face of a person.With all of the media attention it recieved, the article even says \"defenders of the NASA budgetwish there was an ancient civilation on Mars.\" We can infer that NASA's findings were not that of aliens, as though they currently do not have the funds for space exploration projects,\n\nWith people unsatisfied of NASA saying it was just an odd formation of rocks, NASA took pictures of it on April 5, 1998, and again on April 8, 2001. As the images becaome sharper and shaper over time, it looks less and less like a human head. With the better pixels, people could see that it was just as NASA made it out to be- a mesa. With this picture, many theories around the face were not as credible.\n\nSome might say that it still might be from an alien. even so, it seems like something you would see on our world that scientists could prove naturally. The rock formation being common on Earth, and multiple pictures across 25 years is sufficent enough to be proven false.NASA also mentions that the main reaon for the rocks looking as they are are from the strange shadows over it, giving the illusion of a face. The main reason for all the attention it got was simply because ofa trick of the eye. NASA also includes that clouds on the surface could be another reaon it looks as such.\n\nKeeping these things in mind, it's safe to say that the face people see is just a natural part of Mars. The same natural formation can be found around our world .The reason people believed it to be something more was because a poor quality camera by today's standards. Since the, we can better understand how it looks. What would it look like with a camera today? ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Using technology to read's student's emotional expressions is a good way of being able to detect exactly how other people are feeling, even when they are trying to hide their emotions. There is a new software, the Facial Action Coding System, has promising applications for a variety of industries. The process begins when the computer constructs a 3-D computer model of the face; all 44 major muscles in the model must move like human muscles. Movement of one or more muscles is called an ''action unit.'' The Dr. Huang relies on the work of psychologists Dr. Paul Eckman, who he is the creator of FACS (Facial Action Coding System). Eckman ''has classified six basic emotions- happiness, surpise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness - and then associated each characteristic movements of the facial muscles. For example , your frontalis pars lateralis muscle (above your eyes) raises your eyebrows when you're surprised; your orbicularis oris (around your mouth) tightens your lips to show anger. In the article '' Making Mona Lisa Smile .''\n\nEckman (paragraph 3).\n\nIt says in the article '' The facial expressions for each emotion are universal, even though individuals often show varying degrees of expressions.'' Huang, (paragraph 4)\n\nIn fact, us humans perfrom the same kinds of impressive ''clculation'' every day. For instance, you can probaly tell how a friend is feeling simply by the look on there face. The author talks about how '' Most humans communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication, So computers need to understand that, too.'' Huang, (paragraph 6)\n\nAlso in the article it says '' It's all about those muscular action units. They even indiccate the difference between a genuine smile and a forced one. In the real smile, the zygomatic major (muscles that begin at your cheek bones) lift the corners of your mouth.''\n\nD ' Alto (paragraph 7) There is alot of stuff we can all learn about each other, Who knew it would invloe alot of science, facial expressions and emotions. Its always good to know how your students are feeling when you are teaching them something new. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear President of the United States,\n\nI think you should change the whole \"\n\nElectoral Collage\n\n\" and have election by a popular vote instead. It would make much more scence instead of the whole Congress blah, blah, blah, and stuff. I mean I know that this was created by our Founding Fathers and should show respect, but popular voting won't take as long and much faster too. It states that in the article on paragraph 3, the first sentence , \"\n\nThe Electoral College consists on of 538 electors\n\n\". Thats a lot of people. But when people try to vote for you, they are actually voting for the candidate's electors.\n\n\"\n\nUnder the Electoral Collage System, when voters vote not for the president, but for the slate of electors, who in turn elect the president. If you lived in texas, for instance, and wanted to vote for [John] Kerry, you'd vote for the slate of 34 Democratic electores pleged to Kerry\n\n\" (\n\nPar. #10, Sent. #1-2).\n\n\"\n\nThe Electoral College is what we might call a disastor factor. The American people should be lucky that the 2000 fiasco was the biggest election crisis in the century; the system allows much worse\n\n\" (\n\nPar. #11, Sent. #1-2\n\n). That is why I suggest making a popular vote in stead.\n\nSincerely ,\n\nPROPER_NAME\n\n. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars may sound like something of the future but they could be they could easily be the destruction of the future. Driverless cars that are operated by computers and microships, and sensors could pose as huge threats agains the health of humans. Driverless cars could cause more accidents, would cost more to manufacture and sell, and also would eliminate skills already valued by certified drivers.\n\nThe biggest reasons that driverless cars should be a hopeless dream of the future is because of the amount of risks there is when riding in one. Everyone knows from expiereince that technology can never be 100% reliable, so why should we put at our lifes in the hands of technology? One may argue that there would be no irresponsable drivers when technology is in charge, but that is untrue. What if there is a malfunction with the technology and the car stops running on a busy highway? Not only is driverless cars a bad idea, but it also would cause more accidents then driver operated vehicles.\n\nThe second biggest reason that driverless cars may not be the best for the future is that they would cost much more to produce, manufacture,and sell to the general public. Everyone knows that cars can take big dents in a vehicle owners bank account, but vehicles in todays age are a neccescity. If we were to switch over to driverless cars, they would have to produce all new driverless vehicles for everyone that owns a car today. Just think about having to sell your car to be able to pay for a much more expensive technology operated vehicle. In the passage on paragraph 6 the writer says \"Radar was a device on a hilltop that cost two hundered million dollars. It wasn't just something you could buy at Radio Shack\". The writer is comparing radars in 2000 to sensors in 2016, if radars costed 200 Million, what do you think a new upgraded driverless car with \"sensors\" is going to cost us?\n\nThe last and final reason I believe driverless cars should remain just a dream is because it would eliminate skills already valued by drivers today. It talks in the passage about how the popular electric car brand \"Tesla\" is expected to have a 90% driverless car out by the end of 2016. This may sound pretty nice to those who hate driving and can't stand to be behind the wheel, but what about the people that enjoy driving and find it as a hobby and a past time? I have a friend who dedicates his whole life to driving and racing, he loves how independednt he can be and how he can control the vehicle all by himself. If driverless cars become the new trend then people like my friend will have no other hobby to return to and there passion for driving will be a thing of the past if technology becomes the future of vehicles and driving.\n\nAfter all these reasons it should be pretty obvious that driverless vehicles should remain just mereley an idea, not having driverless cars and remaining with the independent driving sysytem we have today would be beneficial to our safety, our values and our bank accounts. Let's leave this wreckless idea of driverless cars in the past! ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The main idea of this story is The Challenge Of Exsploring They go to venus sometime called Evening star is one of the brightest points of light in the night sky. Making it simple Venus is the second planet from our sun. Often reffered to Earths twin. Venus is the closets planet to to Earth in terms of density too. They say venus is 90% carbon diaxide blankets Venus. Clouds are highly corrosive sulferic acid in Venus atomsphere..Human counter on Eath duch and enviroment would crush even a sumberine accustomed to dividing to the deepest parts of our oceans and would liquefy many metals. i want to know why sciencetist even discuss further visitis to its surface. Venus still has some analogues to those on Earth. Maybe we should think of them challenges .Many reserches are working on innovations that would allow our machines to last enough to contribute meaningful to our knowlege of Venus. Modern computers are enormously powerful flexible and quick but tend to be mo delicate when it come to extrem physical conditions...another lasted for three wekks in such conditions. Projects is looking back to to an old technology called merchanical computers. Basically this artical is about the second Earth and thats Venus in how Venus look and how it's bilted. Hoe NASA is working on other approches to studying Venus and how to work with this planet in process. in the 1800s and played an important role in the 1940s during world war 2 so this planet has been involved in quit alot..", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Voting for whos the next president can be hard. Theres so many things to consider, like who will support you the best and make the right desition. The government has made two types of ways to vote, Electoral College and popular vote. I believe that we should go with the popular vote method. When voting like this its not a confusing, Theres no missing ad campaigns, and in the winner take all you dont rule out another persons elector for his chose.\n\nUsing popular vote for electing our president is better then Electoral College i believe because its not that confusing. In Electoral College you vote for a wet number of electors and they give their own vote on their behalf. Now with popular vote say one state votes for president b rather then president a then the state votes for president b.\n\nIn ppular vote both presidents are trying to win you over so they will make a campaign. what if you never see the campaign? This is what can happen in the Electoral College method. If a president knows that a certain state will not vote for them then the president wont perade around there. Therefore the state cant make a correct decision.\n\nThe popular vote method is very diffrent as you have seen in the paragraphs above. One reason I prefer the popular vote method over the Electoral College is do to the winner take all in ruling out the electors that didnt vote for the president. So if theopposing pesident winns the election then he can single you out for note voting for him and i dont believe thats fair.\n\nSo when it comes to election day which method will you chose? Electoral College or popular vote you know that im going to stick with popular vote because Electoral College can be confusing, the ad campaigns cna be unfair and ruling out the opposing electors. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Luke Bomberger is a Seagoing Cowboy that travels world wide to help horses, young cows, mules,and people after World War 2.\n\nI'm Luke Bomberger a Seagoing I travel around the world to help animals like horses, young cows, mules ,and people after World War 2 destroyed most countries were left in ruins. I am now going around helping and trying to convince others to participate in the Seagoing Cowboys program. I start off in China helping others and animals while talking to the communtity to convince them that they should participate in this program because your not only helping people and animals but your also getting the unbelievable opportunity of seeing Europe and China! Even though the animals kept me busy I wasn't giving up convincing others that there is a amazing opportunity to help the damaged and runied spots and help animals out also letting them know that sometimes they can serve as a night watchman that job was to check up on the animals every hour. My last thing telling them was that you can also have fun on board, especially on return trips after the animals had been unloaded by playing games like baseball, volleyball, table-tennis tournaments, frncing, boxing, whitting to help pass time.\"But being a Seagoing Cowboy was much more than an adventure\n\nI'll open up the world to you ,I'll make you more aware of people of other countries and their needs.\" I say to them.\n\nThat is how I Luke Bomberger set my mark on trying to convience others to become a Seagoing Cowboy to help animals, people, and to take the opportunity to see countries like Europe. Would want to become a Seagoing Cowboy?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Google's driveless cars seem dangerous and unfit for the driver and/or passengers of the cars. Also at the same time they seem interesting. The cars are definitely something people would love to try. But if people looked at all the cautions and hazards, i bet they wouldn't. Although it is a future invention that Google is working on, they should probably just stop. The google driveless car is dangerous, and technology can fail at anytime.\n\nGoogle has had cars since 2009. The cars have driven more than half a million miles without crashing. They are not completely driving themselves though. They have prevented accidents. Many different companies are making these types of cars. Which, one of the companies could actually make a good driveless car.\n\nIn the 1950s General Motors created a car, but it could not drive on a special test track. The track was embedded with an electrical cable that sent radio signals to a recevier to the far end of the car. Engineers at Berkeley tried something similiar, but they used magnets. The car still did not work, and was too expensive.\n\nEngineers couldn't get it in the 1950s, and then others tried with magnets thinking it would work. They need to stop trying to make cars run on there own. Honestly its dangerous especailly when they are going to be mostly made out of technology. Its not safe nor is it going to work without any technical problems. No it should not be a way of transportation for the future. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Eliminating car usage can benefit ones life in many ways. Vauban, Germany, is a community where street parking is forbidden, and as a result, many residents have just given up their cars. Residents seem to prefer it this way as well. \"When I had a car I was always tense...I'm much happier this way,\" says Heidrun Walter, a resident. Cars emit up to 50% of greenhouse gas in some car-intensive aareas in the United States. As a result of the minimal car usage in Vauban, stores are being renovated to being a walk away, on a main street, rather than in malls along some distant highway.\n\nPolution and smog are another big problem caused by car usage. Paris had once enforced a partial driving ban to clear the air of the global city, due to a near-record pollution and smog problem. Bogota, Columbia, has an annual Day Without Cars, where car transportation, with the exception of buses and taxis are banned. This is done in an attempt to clear smog. Violators are charged with a $25 fine. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.