You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy.
system
Driverless cars sounds good but what happens is you actually get one. These cars could cause a lot of economic stress and stress on people period. Driverless cars aren't needed becuase these cars could cause conflict, technology isn't always dependable, and we already get into crash's now. The main reason these cars aren't needed is because these cars could cause conflict. Driverless cars sound like a good idea but if you get into an accident because the manufacturer made a mistake, what would you do? In paragraph 9 of the section the author states, "...new laws will be needed in order to cover liabilty in case of an accident." This quote from the article shows how unsure the manufacturer is with his/ her product. If someone came up to you and said "You can borrow my shampoo." and then came later and said "about my shampoo, I'm not sure if it'll clean your hair." what would you say? You probably would be angry with them for telling you afterwards that it might not work. If someone isn't sure about a product that could possibly controll the fate of your life and gave it to you anyway, that's setting up an un-needed conflict. Also, technology isn't always dependable, there could be many mishaps when technology is in control. In paragraph 9 of the article the author makes a point of why the driverless cars aren't needed, eventhough the author is clearly for them "If the technology fails and someone is injured who is at fault--the driver or the manufacturer?" This quote clearly shows how the technology isn't ready. Even if the manufacturer releases the vehicle he/she can't gurantee the technology will succeed. Would you want to have a driverless car that could patentially cause innnocent bistandards to be at risk. Finally, why would you want to have a driverless car when we can't even controll the cars we have now? Almost everday on the news there is someone who gets in a car crash and gets injured whether it's a minor injury or a major one. in paragraph 8 the author tries to make a safety statement, "...systems that use heads-up displays. Such displays can be turned off instantly when the driver needs to take over..." This quote tries to help you understand the safety of driverless cars but evidently it helped you realize another reason why they aren't needed. In the last paragraph you saw how the technology could patentially have a malfunction, what would happen if the heads up display stoppped working and and the driver didn't know he/she needed to take the will. That goes into yet another life threatening situation in which many people could be in danger. In conclusion, driverless cars aren't needed because they could cause a lot of danger and conflict.
user
Your evaluation score is: 3.0
assistant