You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy.
system
The use of this technology to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom is not valuable. This technology can read and tell you how you feel, but is it accurate? It can read your expressions but that is all. No one really knows how you feel deep down inside but yourself. This technology is just taking a guess on what they think how you feel. Someone can make a facial expression but that does not mean how they feel. A lot of people smile but they do not really mean it because they could feel sad they just want to cover it up. Some do not like to express how they feel so they just keep a serious look. The article states "Using video-imagery, the new emotion-recognition software tracks these facial movements". A facial expression could be taken the wrong way too. We do not need technology to tell how someone feels when we have people. Why would someone want this if it is not all the way accurate? If this were to be used then it should be used for fun not for accuracy. This over all idea is good but does not really help. Any one can know that when someone smiles it means that they are happy.
user
Your evaluation score is: 1.0
assistant