You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy.
system
The idea of cars driving themselves has been fantacised for decades. Being able to get into your car and tell it where to take you has now become easier with the new technology available to us today. Like many new technological advances, there are both positive and negative aspects to consider. Self-driving cars seem dependable; however, they will cause more chaos than what they are worth. Technology is constantly changing, meaning that older software quickly becomes aniquated to the point to where it will not function with the newer advances. This constant change could cause the self driving cars to grow aniquated as well, making them useless after a period of time. This tecnology is also very expensive. The article states that "technology has begun to catch up to the dream", but what happens when technology surpasses the idea of self-driving cars? The idea of self-driving cars mat just be a trend that the world will soon grow old from. All it takes is another new idea to shift all focus from self-driving cars to this other new trendy idea. With all technology, comes tecnology problems. Wether it be that the system is overworked, internet connection drops, or batteries die. Tecnology is not very dependable, making trust for these self-driving cars miniscule. When actual humans are behind the wheel, there is room for less error. There is room for less error because that person had to take multiple tests just to be able to drive that car. Also, a human's reaction time has to be far quicker than that of a computer. There is also the arguement of who to blame when this self-driving car gets into a wreck. The makers of these cars would advertise that their car is self-driving, but when their tecnology faults, they would blame the owner of the car. Then driving laws come into place with these new cars. "Traffic laws are written with the assumption that the only safe car has a human driver in control at all times" states the article. This is where the owner of these cars is going to suffer the most. Tecnology made by these big companies will regulate that the driver's hands will be on the wheel at all times, henceforth making them in "control" of the car at all times. That being said, the wreck that the self-driving car got into, will be the owner's fault. In conclusion, self-driving cars are just a trend that many people like the idea of. These cars are too expensive for what they are actually worth. Collision faults will be blamed on the owner, and the cars will be unable to be fully sure that they will work the way this article presumes them to be. If these scientists wish to reduce the number of accidents on the streets, I know a lot of people who should not have their license, make the driving test harder, so that someone can't just go in there and pass.
user
Your evaluation score is: 3.0
assistant