You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy.
system
Although driverless cars have both positive and negative aspects my postion on rather they should or should'nt become a reality is that driverless cars should'nt become a reality. The reason that even as they are develping driverless cars now they can not be tuely driverless. Also the manufactors of the car car didn't nescerly want smart cars they wanted smarter roads. Another reason is that they have only been able to engernieer parts of a driverless car that still need human assistance. Lastly there are still major concerns for the passagers of the driverless cars. Even though driverless car parts have been put in to newer car models the cars are still mainly controled by drivers. for example in 2013 BMW announced their "traffic jam assistant" , but the car only could stop the car if it was 25mph or lower meaning the driver would have to try to stop on their on. another example is that in the 1980's automakers sed speed sensors at the wheels in creation of the antilock brakes, but it tok them ten years to perfect them. whose to say that if the release the self driving car to eraly it won't cause many acidents. In the 1950's Gerneral motors created a concept car that could run on a special track leading to to thought of smart roads. The trought of smart car was an accident because they knew smart roads was'nt possible. the automaker didnt think cars could get much smarter and didn't know how much smart they need to be. the idea was later pick up in 2009 because the knew that it was no way it could happen before the 2000's. they have a big pogress on the devolpment of the driverless car but is thought to be known that they could never be tuely driverless. the driverles car made in 2009 is said to be driverless but is not because is is alway a drriver in the car that has to pull into an out od driveways and parking lots. Also the driver is to to always remain alert because they may have to take over incase of technological falier or emergency. so that is let people know that it can fail at any time. There is also the big safey corncern and legal side of the driverless car. the law beleive that the saest car is one driven and controlled by a human. Most states won't even allow the testing of theses cars. Another issue is who
user
Your evaluation score is: 2.0
assistant