You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy.
system
In the artical, "Making the Mona Lisa Smile" by Nick D'Alto, D'Alto states that using software to identify human emotions could have uses in the classroom. D'Alto has a point when stating that computers could change lessons and lesson plans when they see a student or students get bored or confused, but I have my reasons as to otherwise. I do not believe this should be used in a classroom setting, due to it not only taking away from what a teacher must do, dramaticly changing how schools teach, but is also an invasion into how a student may feel about one part of our sociaty that they may want to keep to themselves. This software watches faces and can tell how a person is feeling this may seem intelegent to use in a classroom, but I beg to differ. Is this not what a teacher is supposed to do? In a classroom setting a teacher is supposed, not only to show you what information they are teaching, but also not make it drivilingly boring so students lose intrest. They must watch how their students react. The artical states "A classroom computer could recognise when a student is becoming confused or bored...Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor." Let us focus on the last point of the quote, "like an effective human instructor," why would we need computers to replicate what a human should do in a classroom setting. If computers can do this why employ teachers at all? If this is the approch we take then what is stopping the world from disbanding schools, and just having students learn online. This could put millions of teachers out of a job. Another quote worth addressing is this, "Most human comunication is nonverbal...computers need to understand that too." Reiterating what I stated earlier why do comuters in the classroom need this when we have human teachers. My second point is, who in the world stated that all school wanted to use computers to teach children. "A classroom computer," is somthing D'alto talks about a lot in this section. What if a school hasn't yet empoyed the use of computers like other schools have? If they are still just pen and paper and have been for years, why fix what isn't broken. If a school can teach without computers why add computers in where there are none needed. Adding these could ruin what works about schools, and how they teach their children. Finaly, if a lesson online is, for example, teaching about the republican party in a mainly democratic area and a student does not look descusted but Intreged or interested. The computer, as the artical states, can identify this along with other emotions. If they are republican in a democratic demographic they could be shunned by their once friends. Having this in classrooms could ruin the chances of someone being socialy accsepted by people if they do not agree with the widly acssepted oppinion. There is always the chance that bringing this into schools and having your emotions layed out for everyone to see could lead to higher rates of bullying, and therefore, higher rates of suicide. Now i am not stating that this software is not useful in a homeschool environment or in a phsyciatrists lobby. This could be useful in these and many other situations. A homeschool student having trouble could be conected to diffrent touters based on how they react to the lessons being taught. In a psyciatrists lobby you could pre-identify who has come because they are depressed, angry, or those who were forced to come due to the desgusted looks on their faces. This software could be used in so many difftent ways, but the immence changes and the hurt it could put on schools and its teachers are the reason that I do not believe it should be used in a school setting.
user
Your evaluation score is: 3.0
assistant