You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy.
system
We are currently in an age of technology that is more advanced then the world has ever seen before. Some of the new technology we have, we used to dream about in science fiction movies. Most of the time these science fiction movies were about utopian societies where there was little to no crime and everything could be done with the push of a button. But some of the more realsitic views of the future had to do with a top percentage of people using the new technology to control and spy on the rest of the people. This is what scares me about this new emotion detecting technology. If a computer can detect how we feel based on what they can see through a front camera; how long until they can know our exact thoughts and intentions? The most immedate problem with using computers that have the Facial Action Coding System in them is that they would be expensive. Not every school will be able to afford this emotion detecting technology and those that can afford it may not know how to use it properly. Not to mention that this could take away jobs from instructors that work hard to engage their students and help them learn. This reminds me very much of a novel called Farenheit 451, where it is alluded to that children are indoctrinated into school at a very young age and are taught by a computer that tells them what to think. Certainly we don't want the youth of our country to be taught by machines, and risk losing the relationship between a student and a teacher. Dr. Huang talks about how this software could "... modify a lesson, like an effetive human instructor." if it detected a student was bored or confused. However, a computer can't reasure a student like an instructor can. Also, some people just have a hard time learning on the computer and would prefer interaction with a teacher. Another problem with using this technology is a potential loss of personal freedom and privacy. "...if you smile when a Web ad appears on your screen, a similar ad might follow. but if you frown, the next ad will be different." This tells me that corporations could be watching me and constantly try to sell me products, even force me to buy them so that the ads will go away. Corporations could pay the people that made the technology for information about what ads recieve positive facial expressions and which recieve negative ones. World governments could even use this to spy on their citizens all the time as well. Such as in the George Orwell novel 1984, where the government is constantly watching its citizens, and there is even a governemntal entity called the thought police. This technology is just bringing us one step closer to having our own thought police and having no freedom or privacy. We've been warned by many writers such as George Orwell, Ray Bradbury, Anthony Burgess, and many more about the dangers of technology in the hands of those that wish to control us. Anthony Burgess wrote a story called A Clockwork Orange about a teenage delinquint that cannot be refromed by the state until they brainwash him into not being able to convey emotons of anger. It concerns me that we are already closer to this than ever before and just imagine the look on these writers faces if they saw our world today. Students in our education system are already taking standerdized tests on computers that are supposed to demonstarte their learning and the effeciveness of their teachers and it doesn't work. So why would this Facial Action Coding System be any more effective? This is a prime example of mankind blindly taking a step foreward, only to end up stumbling four steps back. Nobody is responsible enough to use this new technology purely for the benefit of people. Humans are a greedy, selfish, nosy, and ignorant bunch. So being able to know about what people are thinking and feeling all the time just isn't right and isn't fair. This doesn't neccesarily mean that a system of no technology is the best way to go, but we certainly shouldn't have to monitor our facial expressions every time we turn on our computers to use them.
user
Your evaluation score is: 5.0
assistant