You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy.
system
Is the technology to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom valuable and needed? That is the question. In this article it explains and teaches about a new type of technology called FACS (Facial Action Coding System). This technology has the power to read human emotions and to tell whether one is sad,happy, excited, etc. But the argument is this. Would students benefit having this technology in class to read the emotions of students in the class? Would it be of any value to them? So there are pros and cons to having this technology in the schools for the students. Well the good part about having the technology is that FACS would be able to monitor the feelins of the people in the class. People would be able to see if they were happy or sad or bored. The text says, " A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored." Dr. Haung predicts. " Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor." This means that classes or lessons could possible be more interactive or more fun for the other students that are not engaged into the work. This would increase the learning of students and increase the grades of tons of students. Even with all the pros of this technology, there is still some cons to it as well. For one, it is technology. Technology and machines can be broken or get viruses or other sorts of problems. If there were some sort of error in the FACS then it could read the emotions wrong. Another con to FACS is that people would not have others around them who could tell how they feel. Sometimes it feels better to have friends or others know what people are feeling, rather than having machines do it for them. Humans express many different types of emotions and if humans rely on FACS, then that could interfer with how people socialize. People would not be able to correctly identity what others around them are feeling anymore because they are having technology do all the work. Humans show love, kindness, hate, and many other emotions towards each other. Humans can recognize most of these on their own. Students also have councelors in the school. These people are there for the students if they need help or they need someone to talk to. The students and teacher around are usaully smart enough to tell if there is something wrong just by reading their facial expression or body gestures or signs that they express. In my opinion this FACS technology is a two way street. But I am more lenient on the idea of having some technology in the class reading my emotions. Its the fact sometimes people just want their privacy and want to be left alone. Having something read you emotions can cause stress and anxiety. It gives the thought of someone watching 24/7. Human interaction is in my opinion the way to go and should stay around. Having others know when your sad or happy can really make one feel good. It let's someone know that there are people there for you and that people can tell when something is wrong. Technology can read that for you but it is not the same of a human being. FACS is not needed in the classrooms because students have each other. Sure it could benefit and improve the lessons like it says in paragraph 6. But overall that is what real teachers should be for. To make going to school interesting and to learn. In conlusion to having technology read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom, I say I am against it. I would rather have real people know how I feel rather than some artificial inteligence. There are pros and cons to it of course but in the end, i say just stick to having people read how we feel. Because knowing how someone feels let's other know you care and can assist them.
user
Your evaluation score is: 3.0
assistant