You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy.
system
In this passage "The Challenge of Exploring Venus" the author gives alot of reasonable reasons why we should and should not travel to venus. I like this project that the scientist are doing because it gives us a little bit of a thought of what would life be on another planet, but also how are we supposed to know what would life be on another planet if NASA cant even get close enough to know how the ground is even with it being 700 degrees how would us on earth suvive just floating around a planet. Throughout this passage their are alot of useful resourses 1940 computers etc. but their are resourses that the author didnt even mentin that NASA could use to get a better look at Venus such as a telescope. The author states that some call Venus "Earth's Twin" by size and and density and also states that Vesus used to or still does have water on it just like earth itself. NASA and the scientist should continue to do research on Venus and should send humans up there to do more that has been done.
user
Your evaluation score is: 0.0
assistant