You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy.
system
It class visited library look various books One teacher picked CAPS Right The book written cult domesticity filled ideas submissiveness women devotion home I found book offensive I looking modern perspective Nowadays would considered sexist assume women stay home take care house men work outside home Just piece literature I nt agree nt mean s valued work Certain materials removed libraries found offensive There wide variety people search library finding certain piece material one person finds offensive nearly impossible Materials nt allowed censored reason Materials found library form expression individual created society whole Censoring works would considered violation freedom expression People ages look library find books music magazines Each people different belief What considered work art one person could seen highly offensive another If libraries start censoring books result would small selection drab emotionless materials People visit library find materials interested look around expand interests Libraries need contain wide variety material satisfy knowledgeA library s job educate people enter A good form education exposure different types material Sometimes offending nature novel makes good It gets reader thinking author s purpose The seen offensive work long period time It incorporated issue slavery many people nt ready deal As result book banned libraries schools Now seen one famous works literature That example proves material s reguarded offensive nt automatically value lowered And books left shelf us said Katherine Paterson accurate depiction outcome library censorship materials Part make good work great ability stir controversy among readers Removing controversy remove aspect education along essentially main purpose library
user
Your evaluation score is: 3.0
assistant