You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy.
system
The use of this technology dubbed FACS (Facial Action Coding System) should not be used on humans. Why should we as a society and as a people rely on technology to be able to gage our emotions? This is just not fesiable. For thousands of years humans have communicated and expressed emotions to each other. Through contact, intimacy, literature, and many other ways we have been able to convey emotions and have had lasting effects on people and societys. For example during the 1960's segregation of African American people, a man named Martin Luther King gave speeches and led peaceful protests against the goverment to stop segergation across the United States. Did we need a machine to tell us how deeply he felt about the issue of segregation? No. No we did not. And now today segregation is no more. His affects were lasting and we did not need a machine to tell us that. Why should we rely on a machine to tell us how we feel? Machines have no feeling. They are objects not people. They cannot percive human emotions nor can they put out emotion. Machines are only programmed to do those things. Humans are not programmed. We are like a flowing river. Always changing emotions, having different balances of chemicals in the brain, replacing cells, sheding dead skin cells. Computers do not do these things. They are not alive. Their only powered by everthing but what humans are powered from. The author makes the point that using this technology can be used to improve the quality of education by using the computers ablilty to capture human emotions such as confusion or boredom. " "A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored," Dr. Huang predicts. "Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor." The same technology can make computer-animated faces more expressive-for video games or video surgery. "Most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication," notes Dr. Huang. "So computers need to understand that, too" " (D'Alto 6). Human instructors are best at understanding what the student needs and what the problem many be simply because they are human. This does not account for human instructors that do not care about student education or other things related to peer to instuctor relations. We are not machines. We are not computers. The ablilty to understand emotions is not for a computer to understand. Computers only do what they are programed to do. We as humans have done just fine with out such technology such as when i mentioned the Martin Luther King speech and protests. There is no need for this kind of techonlogy in todays current world.
user
Your evaluation score is: 3.0
assistant