You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy.
system
Libraries known places person go find material almost topic could want learn whether material book movie magazine Anyone use library valuable resource many people So libraries insist removing valuable materials shelves In past years censorship libraries focus many news reports In almost cases library patrons angry certain materials deemed unsuitable offered library I say I agree People right choose books want read movies want watch music want listen People opinions people disagree What one person loves another person could hate But one person dislikes offended material library shelf mean opportunity use material denied patrons I feel resource checked one individual one individual able learn enjoy resource library achieved purpose helped community offering material In conclusion censorship libraries limiting wrong It creates barriers want learn takes away people s freedom make decisions Everyone able decide whether pick library material censorship makes impossible
user
Your evaluation score is: 2.0
assistant