You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy.
system
Many people think technology can change the world or make it better, but sometimes doing things the old-fashioned way works better. Old-Fashioned ways built this country, new technology can be dangerous, and less spending money on new technology can help save money to spend on things people really need are all examples of why technology to read peoples emotions in a classroom is a bad idea. What we really need are good teachers that are willing to teach and make students smarter and more educated. Technology can help becoming more educated, but people really need human interaction with their teachers and peers. Old-fashioned ways built the country that we love and respect today. The people that got this great country running in the right way didn't need fancy technology to help thim. They used human interaction and hard work. Technology that would read people's emotions might be a good tool but what should really be happening is the teachers shoud reconize things like this and take action. It's a problem that the teachers in today's world don't always reconize that their students aren't following a lesson or are bored and confused. The teachers rely on technology to teach the students, when what the students really need is a good teacher who will interact with them and give them a good lesson that the student will get excited for. New technology like the Facial Action Coding System can be very dangerous. There are people these days that have ways to hack into people's computers and stalk them. This system that Dr.Eckman may be a very advanced study and very helpful but there are bad people in this world that take advantage of systems like this. Hackers could easily get into the system and be able to stalk the peoples faces and know what they look like through the FACS. Most parents in this world would want the best safety for their children, and the FACS is not the safest thing parents can give their children. Less spending on technology like the FACS can give people extra money to spend on things that really matter. If schools in America bought these systems they would be spending large sum of money to get these systems for the students and teachers. Instead, the schools could use the money that they would spend on the FACS and use it for starting new programs in the schools that interest more students. Another thing the schools could use that money for is getting teachers that are excited to come to work everyday and want to teach the students and want the students to get a good education. The Facial Action Coding System is a good idea but it may not be safe for students, it could cost a lot of money that could be used for better things, and old-fashioned ways, unlike high tech days, built this country and the country was running great. There are better ways for people to find out the feelings and expression of students during class. Ways to find that out are having good teachers that try and fill the needs of students who aren't enjoying the lesson or who aren't understanding the lessson. We need to think of better ways to find emotional expressions than to use technology like the Facial Action Coding System.
user
Your evaluation score is: 3.0
assistant