You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy.
system
Human emotions are minute aspects of everyone's lives that will never go away nor change. In addition to this, facial expressions convey the same emotion in every continent, country, and culture. Figuring out intentions behind the face can sometimes prove to be a valuable tool, but it could also lead to complications that would inhibit its ability to function in a trustworthy and encrypted way. It's a strange idea, if you think about it. Being able to figure out if someone is lying, hiding something, or conveying a false emotion at the touch of a button or two. Centuries of habits built up over time in the general population towards changing the way people perceive you based on your facial reaction to something will change because there won't be any way to hide an authentic emotion. In the case of using it in schools, I would have to argue that the cons outnumber the pros, and for very specific reasons. School is a place of learning, achievement, and success. It paves the path to greater opportunities for the future, and creates dreamers to fulfill the demands of creativity and humanity. The side of school that is not advertised however is the social exchanges in student-student and student-teacher interactions. Kids that go to school have a pressure upon them, more than one actually. They feel a necessary need to excel in school to prove their worth to society, and they are pressured by their peers to make a place for themslves in school and to rise to the top of the class socially. It is a dog-eat-dog world in school, and competition between students of different working class stems, financial stability, and mental state can sometimes be very intense. After all, putting a bunch of students who at one point never knew each other comes with potential risks, right? Students discover a certain animosity towards other people that helps them learn to support themselves and to not expect much out of anyone their age because students are still learning, still trying to figure out how interactions in the world work. Emotions get fiery, patience runs low, and stress levels rise exponentially the farther you go in years of school. School is not a place that is written on foundations of pleasure. The emotional state of many kids and teens in school suffers because the attention of the student is elsewhere, likely focused on academic success (which in lots of cases might be suffering too). Using a facial recognition system is useful for safety concerns and order in a school, but things get edgy when the emotions of a stressed or otherwise emotionally challenged student come into play. Teachers also have impacts on students--positive or negative--that influence how the student feels, and sometimes the grade that comes out of a particuar class. A reasonable, interactive teacher that focuses their ideals on teaching another human being will tend to have students that feel a positive outlook on the academic success of that class, and will reflect the repercussions of this effect out positively. A teacher who does not have these values and treats the student(s) with personal bias will affect how the student thinks and performs negatively. If a student feels this negative energy from a teacher, there is a good chance that one of two things will happen. The student will keep the information about the specific teacher to themself in order to avoid punishment from the teacher or ridicule by unempathetic students. The other option is that the student will tell other students, parents, etc. about this teacher to rase awareness on the mental and emotional effects that this teacher has on the student. Students have a right to intellectual privacy and free thought, and a school's intentions to penetrate that wall of privacy takes on multiple bad facades. As Dr. Huang spoke: "A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored," is a good point, but you have to take into account other emotions that the computer would pick up too, which may not want to be uncovered in the first place. Even if the privacy of the student was maintained, what need would the school have for storing information on a student's mental and emotional states? Could the school use this against the student? Could the school administors take how the student is feeling the wrong way? Questions like these need to be answered by informed staff of schools that would plan to use the technology on a regular basis to modify and adjust the curriculum of a particular student. In addition to the purpose of the program, there needs to be thought about the attention that a school administration would pay tosuch a program. This can get tricky because a school system has so many areas of interest to maintain, and a computer system such as Dr. Huang's would raise the cost in dollars. It is hard to say if the system would make the adequate adjustments needed to preserve the privacy of the students from an academic standpoint, which would involve the emotions they feel about school, school life, or the academic habits at home. In conclusion, students could find use in the facial recognition system proposed by scientists, but some of the effects that the system could have on the student are not definite nor are available to study yet. The program needs clinical study before seeing action in the real field of school, because society relies on and will use those kinds of students who have a full spectrum of emotional states that might not want to be broadcast to the public.
user
Your evaluation score is: 5.0
assistant