You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy.
system
Driverless cars means less saftey, increase car accidents, and increase of deaths in the U.S. There are still further improvements that need to be done in order to make driverless cars more safe. The cars also aren't actually considered driverless. Also if there were to be an accident who would be held reasponsible, the driver or the manufacturer? Driverless cars are a terrible idea; There are already enough car troubles as it is. The driveless cars still have many improvements such as, the sensors and computer hardware and software upgrades. Those improvements would make the cars more safe, meaning there are many dangerous things that can happen because those improvements aren't done. For example, in paragraph five the author says, " Futher improvements in sensors and computer hardware and software to make the driving safer." Also giving a terrific reason why driverless cars should not be allowed. Driverless cars aren't even considered driverless. The car will still need a person in the drivers seat, that person will be notified in someway when they need to take controll of the car, and that person will still have to have both hands on the wheel. So, how is it considered a driverless car? For example, in paragraph 7 the author states, " in fact, none of the cars developed so far are completely driverless." If there was an accident and someone got injured, who would be held reasponsible the driver or the creater of the car? If the car is driverless and it leads someone into a car wreck, who would get in trouble? People would say the person that recked, but that person was in a driverless car. So, would it be the manufactuer of ther car? Creating and allowing driveless cars is a terrible idea. There are still many upgrades and improvements that need to be done. There are also many questionable answers to situations that can happen.The cars aren't even considered fully driverless yet.
user
Your evaluation score is: 2.0
assistant