Post
213
✅ New Article: Autonomous Incident Reconstruction v0.1
Title:
🚗✈️🤖 Autonomous Systems Incident Reconstruction — Patent‑Safe PoC Design (v0.1)
🔗 https://huggingface.co/blog/kanaria007/autonomous-incident-reconstruction-v0-1
---
Summary:
When autonomous systems fail, we need answers — *with evidence*.
This article applies SI Spec thinking to autonomy forensics: standardized proof objects that create a *causal chain* from perception through actuation to incident response.
*Implementable today* with ROS 2/MAVLink. *Automated tomorrow* when SIL compiler makes determinism and reversibility language features instead of manual work.
> From black-box to glass-box.
> *Court-grade evidence is structured intelligence applied.*
---
Why It Matters:
- Turns post-accident confusion into *reconstructable causal chains* (sensor → decision → actuation → incident)
- Gives safety engineers *instant freeze* on ethics breach (≤50ms) and *safe rollback* to last-known-good models
- Shows SI Spec works in *safety-critical domains* (ISO 26262, UL 4600, EU AI Act compliance)
- Provides *upgrade path*: hand-coded proofs today →
---
What's Inside:
- *Proof objects*: SensorIngestReceipt, DecisionFrame, ActuationTrace, EthicsGateEvent, IncidentTombstone, RollbackReceipt
- *SLOs*: ethics_halt_p95 ≤ 50ms, replay_RIR ≥ 0.9995, xai_faithfulness ≥ 0.85
- *Determinism levels*: DCL-0 (none) → DCL-4 (hardware-enforced bitwise replay)
- *Fleet coordination*: 2PC for multi-vehicle incidents with atomic freeze/revert
- *Implementation*: 6-8 week PoC plan, ROS 2/MAVLink integration examples
---
Related:
- SIL Compiler Spec v0.1 — the language that automates these guarantees : https://huggingface.co/blog/kanaria007/sil-compiler-spec-bundle-v0-1
- Computing PoC — theoretical foundation : https://huggingface.co/blog/kanaria007/computing-poc
Title:
🚗✈️🤖 Autonomous Systems Incident Reconstruction — Patent‑Safe PoC Design (v0.1)
🔗 https://huggingface.co/blog/kanaria007/autonomous-incident-reconstruction-v0-1
---
Summary:
When autonomous systems fail, we need answers — *with evidence*.
This article applies SI Spec thinking to autonomy forensics: standardized proof objects that create a *causal chain* from perception through actuation to incident response.
*Implementable today* with ROS 2/MAVLink. *Automated tomorrow* when SIL compiler makes determinism and reversibility language features instead of manual work.
> From black-box to glass-box.
> *Court-grade evidence is structured intelligence applied.*
---
Why It Matters:
- Turns post-accident confusion into *reconstructable causal chains* (sensor → decision → actuation → incident)
- Gives safety engineers *instant freeze* on ethics breach (≤50ms) and *safe rollback* to last-known-good models
- Shows SI Spec works in *safety-critical domains* (ISO 26262, UL 4600, EU AI Act compliance)
- Provides *upgrade path*: hand-coded proofs today →
@layer(DET) + @frame tomorrow---
What's Inside:
- *Proof objects*: SensorIngestReceipt, DecisionFrame, ActuationTrace, EthicsGateEvent, IncidentTombstone, RollbackReceipt
- *SLOs*: ethics_halt_p95 ≤ 50ms, replay_RIR ≥ 0.9995, xai_faithfulness ≥ 0.85
- *Determinism levels*: DCL-0 (none) → DCL-4 (hardware-enforced bitwise replay)
- *Fleet coordination*: 2PC for multi-vehicle incidents with atomic freeze/revert
- *Implementation*: 6-8 week PoC plan, ROS 2/MAVLink integration examples
---
Related:
- SIL Compiler Spec v0.1 — the language that automates these guarantees : https://huggingface.co/blog/kanaria007/sil-compiler-spec-bundle-v0-1
- Computing PoC — theoretical foundation : https://huggingface.co/blog/kanaria007/computing-poc