BAPO: Stabilizing Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning for LLMs via Balanced Policy Optimization with Adaptive Clipping
Abstract
BAlanced Policy Optimization with Adaptive Clipping (BAPO) addresses challenges in off-policy reinforcement learning by dynamically adjusting clipping bounds to improve sample efficiency, stability, and performance in large language models.
Reinforcement learning (RL) has recently become the core paradigm for aligning and strengthening large language models (LLMs). Yet, applying RL in off-policy settings--where stale data from past policies are used for training--improves sample efficiency, but remains challenging: policy entropy declines sharply, optimization often becomes unstable and may even collapse. Through theoretical and empirical analysis, we identify two key insights: (i) an imbalance in optimization, where negative-advantage samples dominate the policy gradient, suppressing useful behaviors and risking gradient explosions; and (ii) the derived Entropy-Clip Rule, which reveals that the fixed clipping mechanism in PPO-like objectives systematically blocks entropy-increasing updates, thereby driving the policy toward over-exploitation at the expense of exploration. Building on these insights, we propose BAlanced Policy Optimization with Adaptive Clipping (BAPO), a simple yet effective method that dynamically adjusts clipping bounds to adaptively re-balance positive and negative contributions, preserve entropy, and stabilize RL optimization. Across diverse off-policy scenarios--including sample replay and partial rollout--BAPO achieves fast, stable, and data-efficient training. On AIME 2024 and AIME 2025 benchmarks, our 7B BAPO model surpasses open-source counterparts such as SkyWork-OR1-7B, while our 32B BAPO model not only achieves state-of-the-art results among models of the same scale but also outperforms leading proprietary systems like o3-mini and Gemini-2.5-Flash-Thinking.
Community
BAlanced Policy Optimization with Adaptive Clipping (BAPO) addresses challenges in off-policy reinforcement learning by dynamically adjusting clipping bounds to improve sample efficiency, stability, and performance in large language models.
Hi, thanks for the great paper
In the paper, Proposition 2 (Eq. 6) in the appendix writes the logit difference without the pi term, while Proposition 1 includes it - unlike the derivation in Entropy Mechanism (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2505.22617), where pi appears explicitly. Is this an intentional simplification (e.g., assuming natural gradient), or just a notational omission?
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- ASPO: Asymmetric Importance Sampling Policy Optimization (2025)
- CE-GPPO: Coordinating Entropy via Gradient-Preserving Clipping Policy Optimization in Reinforcement Learning (2025)
- DCPO: Dynamic Clipping Policy Optimization (2025)
- Prosperity before Collapse: How Far Can Off-Policy RL Reach with Stale Data on LLMs? (2025)
- Rediscovering Entropy Regularization: Adaptive Coefficient Unlocks Its Potential for LLM Reinforcement Learning (2025)
- Arbitrary Entropy Policy Optimization: Entropy Is Controllable in Reinforcement Fine-tuning (2025)
- Rethinking Entropy Interventions in RLVR: An Entropy Change Perspective (2025)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment:
@librarian-bot
recommend
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper