Papers
arxiv:2510.18927

BAPO: Stabilizing Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning for LLMs via Balanced Policy Optimization with Adaptive Clipping

Published on Oct 21
· Submitted by Zhiheng Xi on Oct 23
#2 Paper of the day
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

BAlanced Policy Optimization with Adaptive Clipping (BAPO) addresses challenges in off-policy reinforcement learning by dynamically adjusting clipping bounds to improve sample efficiency, stability, and performance in large language models.

AI-generated summary

Reinforcement learning (RL) has recently become the core paradigm for aligning and strengthening large language models (LLMs). Yet, applying RL in off-policy settings--where stale data from past policies are used for training--improves sample efficiency, but remains challenging: policy entropy declines sharply, optimization often becomes unstable and may even collapse. Through theoretical and empirical analysis, we identify two key insights: (i) an imbalance in optimization, where negative-advantage samples dominate the policy gradient, suppressing useful behaviors and risking gradient explosions; and (ii) the derived Entropy-Clip Rule, which reveals that the fixed clipping mechanism in PPO-like objectives systematically blocks entropy-increasing updates, thereby driving the policy toward over-exploitation at the expense of exploration. Building on these insights, we propose BAlanced Policy Optimization with Adaptive Clipping (BAPO), a simple yet effective method that dynamically adjusts clipping bounds to adaptively re-balance positive and negative contributions, preserve entropy, and stabilize RL optimization. Across diverse off-policy scenarios--including sample replay and partial rollout--BAPO achieves fast, stable, and data-efficient training. On AIME 2024 and AIME 2025 benchmarks, our 7B BAPO model surpasses open-source counterparts such as SkyWork-OR1-7B, while our 32B BAPO model not only achieves state-of-the-art results among models of the same scale but also outperforms leading proprietary systems like o3-mini and Gemini-2.5-Flash-Thinking.

Community

Paper submitter

BAlanced Policy Optimization with Adaptive Clipping (BAPO) addresses challenges in off-policy reinforcement learning by dynamically adjusting clipping bounds to improve sample efficiency, stability, and performance in large language models.

Hi, thanks for the great paper

In the paper, Proposition 2 (Eq. 6) in the appendix writes the logit difference without the pi term, while Proposition 1 includes it - unlike the derivation in Entropy Mechanism (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2505.22617), where pi appears explicitly. Is this an intentional simplification (e.g., assuming natural gradient), or just a notational omission?

This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.

The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API

Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!

If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space

You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend

Sign up or log in to comment

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2510.18927 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2510.18927 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2510.18927 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 1