<p>Starting at the end, the simple answer is that intreset rates are decided as a counter measure for slow growth, which may derive from productivity slump. Meaning interest policy is a result, not a cause</p>

<p>On a wider level, the interntion of Central bankers is that there is a productivity rate, internally set in the economy set it's pace of growth. Imagine the added value of internet applications, as opposed to the world before that, as an example.</p>

<p>Their goal, is to set interest rate to match the proper appetite for risk, to encourage that productivity growth: take loans to pay for internet services, as per the example</p>

<p>The main parameter lacking in your equation, is that monitary policy cannot be the main economic policy to encourage productivity. It's the government in general: investinh in education, lowering barries for good healthy markets, provide a supporting legal system for business disputes etc.</p>

<p>Monitary policy can only be effective to a certain extent, in a way, like a wide (regressive) tax deduction</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-03-04T11:14:46.020Z
Thank you for the answer. However, I suspect the article (second link) tries to argue that there is a circular relationship between the variables.

“(..) we test the existence of a circular relationship between interest rates and productivity growth. It is well-known that productivity is a long-term determinant of return on capital and thereby of interest rates .. it is only one side of the coin. Interest rates are also a determinant of the minimum expected return from investment projects, and therefore of the productivity level“.

And I could not grasp how IR can influence productivity?
R_quester
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-03-04T19:13:18.437Z
Interest rates encourage, theoretically, to initiate lower return investments, as it is easier to get funding at lower costs. The increase in investment incentive, theoretically, encourage productivity. at today's low rates, it's practically encourages bubbles and debt, but that's my opinion
Guy Louzon
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-03-04T06:57:21.413Z
2020-03-04T06:57:21.413Z
Guy Louzon
<p>Isabel Schnabel, Member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank point at the interview out "The real interest rate (...) emerges from the economy’s growth potential in the long run.“ <a href="https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/inter/date/2020/html/ecb.in200211~d2b4afb5d3.en.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/inter/date/2020/html/ecb.in200211~d2b4afb5d3.en.html</a></p>

<p>Another article also touches upon this question "It is well-known that <strong>productivity is a long-term determinant</strong> of return on capital and thereby <strong>of interest rates</strong>, which explains why there is a <strong>positive correlation between these two indicators</strong>" <a href="https://www.clevelandfed.org/newsroom-and-events/publications/economic-commentary/2017-economic-commentaries/ec-201720-productivity-real-interest-rates-long-run.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.clevelandfed.org/newsroom-and-events/publications/economic-commentary/2017-economic-commentaries/ec-201720-productivity-real-interest-rates-long-run.aspx</a></p>

<p>However, for me it seems counter-intuitive. If productivity is low i.e. growth is week, than the risk to lend is high, meaning the lenders would demand higher premium for the risk -> IR would be higher on average. <strong>Can you please come up with an explanation on why slower productivity growth would result in lower interest rates?</strong></p>

<economic-growth><interest-rate>
Interaction between productivity growth and interest rates
R_quester
# Interaction between productivity growth and interest rates

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-03-03)

Isabel Schnabel, Member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank point at the interview out "The real interest rate (...) emerges from the economy’s growth potential in the long run.“ <https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/inter/date/2020/html/ecb.in200211~d2b4afb5d3.en.html>

Another article also touches upon this question "It is well-known that **productivity is a long-term determinant** of return on capital and thereby **of interest rates**, which explains why there is a **positive correlation between these two indicators**" <https://www.clevelandfed.org/newsroom-and-events/publications/economic-commentary/2017-economic-commentaries/ec-201720-productivity-real-interest-rates-long-run.aspx>

However, for me it seems counter-intuitive. If productivity is low i.e. growth is week, than the risk to lend is high, meaning the lenders would demand higher premium for the risk -> IR would be higher on average. **Can you please come up with an explanation on why slower productivity growth would result in lower interest rates?**

**Tags:** economic-growth, interest-rate


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2020-03-04. Score: 1

Starting at the end, the simple answer is that intreset rates are decided as a counter measure for slow growth, which may derive from productivity slump. Meaning interest policy is a result, not a cause

On a wider level, the interntion of Central bankers is that there is a productivity rate, internally set in the economy set it's pace of growth. Imagine the added value of internet applications, as opposed to the world before that, as an example.

Their goal, is to set interest rate to match the proper appetite for risk, to encourage that productivity growth: take loans to pay for internet services, as per the example

The main parameter lacking in your equation, is that monitary policy cannot be the main economic policy to encourage productivity. It's the government in general: investinh in education, lowering barries for good healthy markets, provide a supporting legal system for business disputes etc.

Monitary policy can only be effective to a certain extent, in a way, like a wide (regressive) tax deduction

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Thank you for the answer. However, I suspect the article (second link) tries to argue that there is a circular relationship between the variables.  “(..) we test the existence of a circular relationship between interest rates and productivity growth. It is well-known that productivity is a long-term determinant of return on capital and thereby of interest rates .. it is only one side of the coin. Interest rates are also a determinant of the minimum expected return from investment projects, and therefore of the productivity level“.  And I could not grasp how IR can influence productivity?  
> **username_1**: Interest rates encourage, theoretically, to initiate lower return investments, as it is easier to get funding at lower costs. The increase in investment incentive, theoretically, encourage productivity. at today's low rates, it's practically encourages bubbles and debt, but that's my opinion  

---

