<h1>Short Answer</h1>
<p>The Use and Supply tables do not have industries on both rows and columns. For example, as shown in the screenshot below, the <a href="https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=52&amp;step=102&amp;isuri=1&amp;table_list=3&amp;aggregation=sum" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Supply table</a> has commodities on the rows and the industries are the columns. Perhaps the confusion is coming from the fact that the commodities and the industries use the same encoding. For example, as you point out, why is there a commodity called &quot;Farms&quot; that use the code 111CA? This is because the commodity called &quot;Farms&quot; represent the commodities produced by the industry called &quot;Farms.&quot;</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/dOibg.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/dOibg.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>
<h1>Extra Details</h1>
<p>As I mentioned, the commodity called &quot;Farms&quot; represents the commodities produced by the industry called &quot;Farms.&quot; This can be problematic because different industries may produce the same good. For example, the restaurant industry produces food while the hotel industry may cook meals as well as provide rooms to stay in. This problem is handled somewhat in the &quot;redefinitions&quot; process. You can take a look at tables before and after redefinitions <a href="https://www.bea.gov/industry/benchmark-input-output-data" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a>. You can read more details in the BEA IO tables handbook <a href="https://www.bea.gov/resources/methodologies/concepts-methods-io-accounts" rel="nofollow noreferrer">&quot;Concepts and Methods of the U.S. Input-Output Accounts&quot;.</a></p>
<p>Also, you should note that there is an effort to develop and introduce a new, separate classification system for products that is independent of the industry classification system. For example, the BEA uses a version of the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Industry_Classification_System" rel="nofollow noreferrer">North American Industry Classification System</a> for industries and will eventually start using the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Product_Classification_System" rel="nofollow noreferrer">North American Product Classification System</a> (NAPCS) for products. As <a href="https://www.census.gov/naics/napcs/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">explained by the US Census Bureau</a>, this has the following benefits:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The North American Product Classification System (NAPCS) is a
comprehensive, market- or demand-based, hierarchical classification
system for products (goods and services) that (a) is not
industry-of-origin based but can be linked to the NAICS industry
structure, (b) is consistent across the three North American
countries, and (c) promotes improvements in the identification and
classification of service products across international classification
systems, such as the Central Product Classification System of the
United Nations.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You can read more about the status of NAPCS <a href="https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2020/north-american-product-classification-codes.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a>.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-09-26T14:48:21.450Z
This is immensely helpful. Now that I understand that there is a "Farm commodity," the follow up is whether or not a household directly consumes that commodity (related to this question: https://economics.stackexchange.com/questions/47680/how-could-you-partition-household-food-expenditures-into-producing-industries). Looking at the "Personal consumption expenditure" column of the Use table, it appears that they do!
Ben Ogorek
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-09-26T01:26:34.123Z
2021-09-26T01:32:25.697Z
2021-09-26T01:32:25.697Z
jmbejara
<p>I'm learning about Use and Supply tables, and all the tutorials (including <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFNqVHs_j4E" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this very nice video</a> from the Singapore Department of Statistics) show that products are on the rows and industries are on the columns.</p>
<p>However, the <a href="https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=52&amp;step=102&amp;isuri=1&amp;table_list=3&amp;aggregation=sum" rel="nofollow noreferrer">BEA Supply Table</a> and <a href="https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=52&amp;step=102&amp;isuri=1&amp;table_list=4&amp;aggregation=sum" rel="nofollow noreferrer">BEA Use Table</a> have industries on both the rows and columns. What does it mean for Farms to supply Farms?</p>

<supply-and-demand><input-output>
Why do the BEA's Use and Supply Tables have Industries (and not products) on the Rows?
Ben Ogorek
# Why do the BEA's Use and Supply Tables have Industries (and not products) on the Rows?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2021-09-25)

I'm learning about Use and Supply tables, and all the tutorials (including [this very nice video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFNqVHs_j4E) from the Singapore Department of Statistics) show that products are on the rows and industries are on the columns.

However, the [BEA Supply Table](https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=52&step=102&isuri=1&table_list=3&aggregation=sum) and [BEA Use Table](https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=52&step=102&isuri=1&table_list=4&aggregation=sum) have industries on both the rows and columns. What does it mean for Farms to supply Farms?

**Tags:** supply-and-demand, input-output


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2021-09-26. Score: 3 | Accepted answer

# Short Answer

The Use and Supply tables do not have industries on both rows and columns. For example, as shown in the screenshot below, the [Supply table](https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=52&step=102&isuri=1&table_list=3&aggregation=sum) has commodities on the rows and the industries are the columns. Perhaps the confusion is coming from the fact that the commodities and the industries use the same encoding. For example, as you point out, why is there a commodity called "Farms" that use the code 111CA? This is because the commodity called "Farms" represent the commodities produced by the industry called "Farms."

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/dOibg.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/dOibg.png)

# Extra Details

As I mentioned, the commodity called "Farms" represents the commodities produced by the industry called "Farms." This can be problematic because different industries may produce the same good. For example, the restaurant industry produces food while the hotel industry may cook meals as well as provide rooms to stay in. This problem is handled somewhat in the "redefinitions" process. You can take a look at tables before and after redefinitions [here](https://www.bea.gov/industry/benchmark-input-output-data). You can read more details in the BEA IO tables handbook ["Concepts and Methods of the U.S. Input-Output Accounts".](https://www.bea.gov/resources/methodologies/concepts-methods-io-accounts)

Also, you should note that there is an effort to develop and introduce a new, separate classification system for products that is independent of the industry classification system. For example, the BEA uses a version of the [North American Industry Classification System](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Industry_Classification_System) for industries and will eventually start using the [North American Product Classification System](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Product_Classification_System) (NAPCS) for products. As [explained by the US Census Bureau](https://www.census.gov/naics/napcs/), this has the following benefits:

> The North American Product Classification System (NAPCS) is a
> comprehensive, market- or demand-based, hierarchical classification
> system for products (goods and services) that (a) is not
> industry-of-origin based but can be linked to the NAICS industry
> structure, (b) is consistent across the three North American
> countries, and (c) promotes improvements in the identification and
> classification of service products across international classification
> systems, such as the Central Product Classification System of the
> United Nations.

You can read more about the status of NAPCS [here](https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2020/north-american-product-classification-codes.html).

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: This is immensely helpful. Now that I understand that there is a "Farm commodity," the follow up is whether or not a household directly consumes that commodity (related to this question: https://economics.stackexchange.com/questions/47680/how-could-you-partition-household-food-expenditures-into-producing-industries). Looking at the "Personal consumption expenditure" column of the Use table, it appears that they do!  

---

