<p>To continue your example: <br>
Resources (including labor) cost $x$, product sells for 4$x$. The fat cat business owner makes 3$x$. What does he do with it? If he spends it, for example plays golf or gets his hair done then the people providing those services get the money. Thus there need not be debt, the hairdresser can use these earnings to buy the product the fat cat's business was selling. The usual water analogy is of a circulatory system: water (money) flows from one vessel to the other.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-08-09T04:38:34.120Z
What if the business owner burn money for cooking or dump money in to the sea to make artificial island?
Victor
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-08-09T05:52:21.810Z
@Victor you mean he does not spend it? You could also ask what if he always (literally always) invested the money and never bought anything. As long as he spends enough there is no problem because the money supply is growing. If every business owner would burn all of their earnings there would indeed be debt.
Giskard
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-08-08T06:20:15.700Z
2015-08-08T06:20:15.700Z
Giskard
<p>The analogy would be stirring water in a bucket; without adding more water to the bucket, there is no gain... </p>

<p>Obviously the various resources to create say an iPod came from different countries... but this general concept of x = 4x therefore the company made 3x (as an over simplification) so where did the 3x come from? From people yes, but if it's always subtracting then how do we get to positive?</p>

<money>
If a business charges more for a product than the cost to make it, how is our economy not inevitably doomed for debt?
Jacob David C. Cunningham
# If a business charges more for a product than the cost to make it, how is our economy not inevitably doomed for debt?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-08-08)

The analogy would be stirring water in a bucket; without adding more water to the bucket, there is no gain...

Obviously the various resources to create say an iPod came from different countries... but this general concept of x = 4x therefore the company made 3x (as an over simplification) so where did the 3x come from? From people yes, but if it's always subtracting then how do we get to positive?

**Tags:** money


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2015-08-08. Score: 4

To continue your example:   
Resources (including labor) cost $x$, product sells for 4$x$. The fat cat business owner makes 3$x$. What does he do with it? If he spends it, for example plays golf or gets his hair done then the people providing those services get the money. Thus there need not be debt, the hairdresser can use these earnings to buy the product the fat cat's business was selling. The usual water analogy is of a circulatory system: water (money) flows from one vessel to the other.

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: What if the business owner burn money for cooking or dump money in to the sea to make artificial island?  
> **username_1**: @username_2 you mean he does not spend it? You could also ask what if he always (literally always) invested the money and never bought anything. As long as he spends enough there is no problem because the money supply is growing. If every business owner would burn all of their earnings there would indeed be debt.  

---

