<blockquote>
<p>When do the corporates pay back?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>These are bonds.  <strong>It doesn't matter who owns them.</strong>  They get &quot;paid back&quot; -- <s>dividends</s> interest and principal -- according to the terms of the bonds.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>What is the impact on economy when they have to payback?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>None, because the central bank makes the money disappear.  On the plus side, it slightly reduces the money supply.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>where does the Fed get money from for this corporate bond buying?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>They &quot;printed money&quot;.</p>
<p>A better question (which has also been answered, if you search for it) is why the trillions of printed dollars (aka Quantitative Easing) hasn't produced inflation.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-26T17:17:59.253Z
On ‘what is the impact to economy when bonds are repaid’ I disagree that US debt is reduced.  Simply the assets (and liabilities) of the Federal reserve are reduced.  This will arguably not have any effect provided the financial markets are stable and the debt can be refinanced in the private bond markets.
dm63
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-26T19:12:14.120Z
@dm63 how are the assets reduced, if a bond asset is exchanged for a cash asset?
RonJohn
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-26T23:02:50.087Z
Because the ‘cash’ is retired.  Unprinted , if you like.
dm63
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-26T15:11:19.550Z
2020-12-26T23:09:55.273Z
2020-12-26T23:09:55.273Z
RonJohn
<p>Report on the Federal Reserve's Balance Sheet August 2020 (40 pages):</p>
<p><a href="https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/balance_sheet_developments_report_202008.pdf.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/balance_sheet_developments_report_202008.pdf.pdf</a></p>
<p>Classification of Fed assets and liabilities taken from Table 1 on nominal page 4:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Assets = Securities + Repo + Loans + All Other Assets</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>Securities = Treasury securities + Agency debt securities + Agency mortgage-backed securities</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>Liabilities = Currency + Reserve Balances + Reverse repo + TGA + Treasury contributions to credit facilities + Other liabilities</p>
</blockquote>
<p>To purchase any financial asset or extend a loan Fed simply credits the reserve balances of a bank for an increase and does not have to borrow or tax or save funds to do so. Repayment of debt owed to Fed, or sale of security or loan by Fed, Fed simply debits the reserve balances of a bank for a decrease.</p>
<p>Banks clear payment on behalf of non-banks so if Fed deals with a non-bank the banks still see an increase or decrease of reserves. However when a non-bank is involved in transactions with Fed there is an increase or decrease of bank deposits in addition to the corresponding change in bank reserves. So Fed can add or drain liquidity, in the levels of reserve balances (via deals with banks) and bank deposits (via deals with non-banks), by changing its asset position.</p>
<p>To have control over the monetary policy rate either Treasury or Fed can issue interest-bearing liabilities as alternatives to holding currency or zero interest reserve balances.</p>
<p>In terms of the original question the Fed purchased Agency MBS starting in late 2008 or early 2009 which perhaps were backed by the full faith and credit of the federal government because Treasury became Conservator of key federal home loan banks during the mortgage crisis. Fed could allow these assets to run off its balance sheet as repayment comes due and cancel reserve balances equal to the reduction of assets. Alternatively Fed could reinvest or further invest in Agency MBS. I cannot find a reference for Fed Agency MBS policy since 2008-2020.</p>
<p>During the 2020 Covid crisis Fed added a number of facilities shown in the assets of the paper on Table 1. These include a corporate credit facility, main street facilities, and municipal liquidity facilities, which may represent purchases of bonds in open markets to provide liquidity to the respective sector. Again when these repay the Fed would cancel the respective asset and corresponding cancel bank reserves. This policy would allow assets and reserves to run off the balance sheet. However Fed can reinvest which keeps assets and reserves at the same level or Fed can expand credit policy increasing assets and reserves.</p>
<p>The impact on the economy is complex and subject to economic debate under the concepts of monetary policy, monetary policy transmission mechanisms, lender of last resort policy, dealer of last resort policy, and federal government as investor of last resort since Treasury tends to put up equity funds to take a loss on programs managed by Fed.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-26T20:24:55.090Z
2020-12-27T17:57:01.413Z
2020-12-27T17:57:01.413Z
SystemTheory
<p>The US Federal Reserve did the corporate bond buying program in the 2008 crisis and again now during the 2020 pandemic. What happens to the bonds it is buying? That is, someday it matures and corporates pay the money back to Fed. Where can one get this data? I can see the Fed's asset holding from its weekly report (<a href="https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_recenttrends.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_recenttrends.htm</a>). This one seems to give a picture that bonds bought in 2008 are still held by the Fed. Now in 2020 again there is big spike in holdings due to the purchase again. So, my questions are:</p>
<ol>
<li>When do the corporates pay back?</li>
<li>What is the impact on economy when they have to payback?</li>
<li>If there is data on such redemptions, where can I find it?</li>
<li>where does the Fed get money from for this corporate bond buying? Tax? But, Would'nt this go cyclical and beat the purpose? That is, government wants to increase money available to public &amp; businesses. So, it buys corporate bonds. If it is done from tax money, it'll spend less on welfare. If it levies more tax, then that will suck money from the hands of public resulting in money crunch again. So, how does the Fed avoid this?</li>
</ol>

<federal-reserve>
When does US Federal Reserve redeem the corporate bonds it bought?
Satheesh Paul Antonysamy
# When does US Federal Reserve redeem the corporate bonds it bought?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-12-26)

The US Federal Reserve did the corporate bond buying program in the 2008 crisis and again now during the 2020 pandemic. What happens to the bonds it is buying? That is, someday it matures and corporates pay the money back to Fed. Where can one get this data? I can see the Fed's asset holding from its weekly report (<https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_recenttrends.htm>). This one seems to give a picture that bonds bought in 2008 are still held by the Fed. Now in 2020 again there is big spike in holdings due to the purchase again. So, my questions are:

1. When do the corporates pay back?
2. What is the impact on economy when they have to payback?
3. If there is data on such redemptions, where can I find it?
4. where does the Fed get money from for this corporate bond buying? Tax? But, Would'nt this go cyclical and beat the purpose? That is, government wants to increase money available to public & businesses. So, it buys corporate bonds. If it is done from tax money, it'll spend less on welfare. If it levies more tax, then that will suck money from the hands of public resulting in money crunch again. So, how does the Fed avoid this?

**Tags:** federal-reserve


---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2020-12-26. Score: 2

> When do the corporates pay back?

These are bonds. **It doesn't matter who owns them.** They get "paid back" -- ~~dividends~~ interest and principal -- according to the terms of the bonds.

> What is the impact on economy when they have to payback?

None, because the central bank makes the money disappear. On the plus side, it slightly reduces the money supply.

> where does the Fed get money from for this corporate bond buying?

They "printed money".

A better question (which has also been answered, if you search for it) is why the trillions of printed dollars (aka Quantitative Easing) hasn't produced inflation.

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: On ‘what is the impact to economy when bonds are repaid’ I disagree that US debt is reduced.  Simply the assets (and liabilities) of the Federal reserve are reduced.  This will arguably not have any effect provided the financial markets are stable and the debt can be refinanced in the private bond markets.  
> **username_1**: @username_2 how are the assets reduced, if a bond asset is exchanged for a cash asset?  
> **username_2**: Because the ‘cash’ is retired.  Unprinted , if you like.  

---

### Answer by username_3 on 2020-12-26. Score: 0

Report on the Federal Reserve's Balance Sheet August 2020 (40 pages):

<https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/balance_sheet_developments_report_202008.pdf.pdf>

Classification of Fed assets and liabilities taken from Table 1 on nominal page 4:

> Assets = Securities + Repo + Loans + All Other Assets

> Securities = Treasury securities + Agency debt securities + Agency mortgage-backed securities

> Liabilities = Currency + Reserve Balances + Reverse repo + TGA + Treasury contributions to credit facilities + Other liabilities

To purchase any financial asset or extend a loan Fed simply credits the reserve balances of a bank for an increase and does not have to borrow or tax or save funds to do so. Repayment of debt owed to Fed, or sale of security or loan by Fed, Fed simply debits the reserve balances of a bank for a decrease.

Banks clear payment on behalf of non-banks so if Fed deals with a non-bank the banks still see an increase or decrease of reserves. However when a non-bank is involved in transactions with Fed there is an increase or decrease of bank deposits in addition to the corresponding change in bank reserves. So Fed can add or drain liquidity, in the levels of reserve balances (via deals with banks) and bank deposits (via deals with non-banks), by changing its asset position.

To have control over the monetary policy rate either Treasury or Fed can issue interest-bearing liabilities as alternatives to holding currency or zero interest reserve balances.

In terms of the original question the Fed purchased Agency MBS starting in late 2008 or early 2009 which perhaps were backed by the full faith and credit of the federal government because Treasury became Conservator of key federal home loan banks during the mortgage crisis. Fed could allow these assets to run off its balance sheet as repayment comes due and cancel reserve balances equal to the reduction of assets. Alternatively Fed could reinvest or further invest in Agency MBS. I cannot find a reference for Fed Agency MBS policy since 2008-2020.

During the 2020 Covid crisis Fed added a number of facilities shown in the assets of the paper on Table 1. These include a corporate credit facility, main street facilities, and municipal liquidity facilities, which may represent purchases of bonds in open markets to provide liquidity to the respective sector. Again when these repay the Fed would cancel the respective asset and corresponding cancel bank reserves. This policy would allow assets and reserves to run off the balance sheet. However Fed can reinvest which keeps assets and reserves at the same level or Fed can expand credit policy increasing assets and reserves.

The impact on the economy is complex and subject to economic debate under the concepts of monetary policy, monetary policy transmission mechanisms, lender of last resort policy, dealer of last resort policy, and federal government as investor of last resort since Treasury tends to put up equity funds to take a loss on programs managed by Fed.


---

