<p>Def 1 is wrong. An inferior good is a good for which the demand decreases after a decrease in the agent's income. (not a decrease in the price of the good). </p>

<p>Definition 2 is trying to define the same concept, "an inferior good" so it is also wrong. Instead, both definitions would be appropriate if they were describing a Giffen good. </p>

<p>Giffen goods are indeed a special case of an inferior good. These are goods for which the law of demand does not apply. Since their demand has a positive relationship with price. The reason why this positive relationship is possible is that when prices change, they create income and substitution effect, and when goods are inferior, these effects go in the opposite direction. Thus, if the income effect dominates the substitution effect, you get the (seemingly counter-intuitive) behavior that demand increases when prices go up, and decreases when prices go down (a Giffen good). Note that to be a Giffen good you need to be inferior, but the reverse is not necessarily true, for example, if the substitution effect dominates the income effect. </p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-04-22T04:47:52.473Z
2019-04-22T04:47:52.473Z
Regio
<p>It's not always the case that the income effect will outweigh the substitution effect. The ones that outweigh the substitution effect are the Giffen goods.  The ones that don't are just plain inferior goods. </p>

<p>Example: Suppose you are on a low nutrious diet because you earn less and can't afford other items. Now your income increases the demand for your current good decreases. These low nutritional products are your inferior goods. </p>

<p>Now, take the case where the price increases for the low nutrious dietary items, but your demand will decrease like any other usual good but will not increase. </p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-22T13:13:39.333Z
2018-11-22T13:13:39.333Z
Sumukh Sai
<p>What is the difference between an inferior good and a Giffen good?
Are the two following definitions for an inferior good equivalent?</p>

<p><strong>Def 1:</strong> An inferior good is a good for which the demand decreases after a decrease of its price. </p>

<p><strong>Def 2:</strong> An inferior good is a good for which the income effect leads to a decrease of demand after a relative decrease of its price.</p>

<p>A Giffen good (1) is when after a decrease in price of good (1) the demand for (1) decreases but the demand of some other good (2) increases.</p>

<p>Or is <strong>Def 1</strong> just the definition of a Giffen good, which is a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inferior_good#Giffen_goods" rel="nofollow noreferrer">special type of inferior good</a> ?</p>

<p>For a Giffen good the Income Effect is strong enough to outweigh the Substitution Effect... But isn't it also the case for all inferior goods? The change in their demand is going to be negative (we consume less after the decrese in price) and that change is equal to the sum of SE and IE, so we also get that Income Effect is strong enough to outweigh the Substitution Effect.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-03T16:12:16.123Z
As currently written, your "Def 1" defines a Giffen good, not an inferior good. Your "Def 2" is incorrect. A Giffen good is a special type of inferior good.
Matthew Gunn
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-03T16:21:13.290Z
So how do you define an inferior good? Your comment isn’t very helpful, for instance you don’t have to repeat that a Giffen good is a special type of inferior good. *That’s* my question. Why isn’t every inferior good not a Giffen good. What are particularities of Giffen goods that are absent in inferior goods?
John
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-03T23:58:18.883Z
Let $x_i(\mathbf{p}, w)$ denote the demand for good $i$ at price vector $\mathbf{p} = \begin{bmatrix} p_1 \\ \ldots \\p_k\end{bmatrix}$ and income $w$. A good is called *inferior* if you purchase less as your income increases: $\frac{\partial x_i(\mathbf{p}, w)}{\partial w} < 0$. A good is called *normal* if you purchase more as your income increases: $\frac{\partial x_i(\mathbf{p},w)}{\partial w} > 0$. A good is called a *Giffen good* if you purchase more as its own price $p_i$ increases. $\frac{\partial x_i(\mathbf{p},w)}{\partial p_i} > 0$. For a Giffen good, demand is upward sloping.
Matthew Gunn
<microeconomics><supply-and-demand><giffen-goods>
Difference between Giffen and inferior goods. Why aren't all inferior goods Giffen goods?
John
# Difference between Giffen and inferior goods. Why aren't all inferior goods Giffen goods?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-11-03)

What is the difference between an inferior good and a Giffen good?
Are the two following definitions for an inferior good equivalent?

**Def 1:** An inferior good is a good for which the demand decreases after a decrease of its price.

**Def 2:** An inferior good is a good for which the income effect leads to a decrease of demand after a relative decrease of its price.

A Giffen good (1) is when after a decrease in price of good (1) the demand for (1) decreases but the demand of some other good (2) increases.

Or is **Def 1** just the definition of a Giffen good, which is a [special type of inferior good](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inferior_good#Giffen_goods) ?

For a Giffen good the Income Effect is strong enough to outweigh the Substitution Effect... But isn't it also the case for all inferior goods? The change in their demand is going to be negative (we consume less after the decrese in price) and that change is equal to the sum of SE and IE, so we also get that Income Effect is strong enough to outweigh the Substitution Effect.

**Tags:** microeconomics, supply-and-demand, giffen-goods

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: As currently written, your "Def 1" defines a Giffen good, not an inferior good. Your "Def 2" is incorrect. A Giffen good is a special type of inferior good.  
> **username_0**: So how do you define an inferior good? Your comment isn’t very helpful, for instance you don’t have to repeat that a Giffen good is a special type of inferior good. *That’s* my question. Why isn’t every inferior good not a Giffen good. What are particularities of Giffen goods that are absent in inferior goods?  
> **username_1**: Let $x_i(\mathbf{p}, w)$ denote the demand for good $i$ at price vector $\mathbf{p} = \begin{bmatrix} p_1 \\ \ldots \\p_k\end{bmatrix}$ and income $w$. A good is called *inferior* if you purchase less as your income increases: $\frac{\partial x_i(\mathbf{p}, w)}{\partial w} < 0$. A good is called *normal* if you purchase more as your income increases: $\frac{\partial x_i(\mathbf{p},w)}{\partial w} > 0$. A good is called a *Giffen good* if you purchase more as its own price $p_i$ increases. $\frac{\partial x_i(\mathbf{p},w)}{\partial p_i} > 0$. For a Giffen good, demand is upward sloping.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2019-04-22. Score: 1

Def 1 is wrong. An inferior good is a good for which the demand decreases after a decrease in the agent's income. (not a decrease in the price of the good).

Definition 2 is trying to define the same concept, "an inferior good" so it is also wrong. Instead, both definitions would be appropriate if they were describing a Giffen good.

Giffen goods are indeed a special case of an inferior good. These are goods for which the law of demand does not apply. Since their demand has a positive relationship with price. The reason why this positive relationship is possible is that when prices change, they create income and substitution effect, and when goods are inferior, these effects go in the opposite direction. Thus, if the income effect dominates the substitution effect, you get the (seemingly counter-intuitive) behavior that demand increases when prices go up, and decreases when prices go down (a Giffen good). Note that to be a Giffen good you need to be inferior, but the reverse is not necessarily true, for example, if the substitution effect dominates the income effect.


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2018-11-22. Score: 0

It's not always the case that the income effect will outweigh the substitution effect. The ones that outweigh the substitution effect are the Giffen goods. The ones that don't are just plain inferior goods.

Example: Suppose you are on a low nutrious diet because you earn less and can't afford other items. Now your income increases the demand for your current good decreases. These low nutritional products are your inferior goods.

Now, take the case where the price increases for the low nutrious dietary items, but your demand will decrease like any other usual good but will not increase.


---

