<p>If it is mid-year population then, why it is so less in comparison to 'total population'</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/yfVUw.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/yfVUw.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/yfVUw.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/yfVUw.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a>
<a href="https://i.sstatic.net/pp10H.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/pp10H.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a>
<a href="https://i.sstatic.net/PP6OM.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/PP6OM.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-06-11T03:36:32.030Z
Interesting, around 1000 times difference, is there any further information apart from the Table by the way?
Phil Nguyen
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-06-11T04:07:35.087Z
@BeautifulMindset SOURCE: unstats.un.org as on 5-12-2016, mentioned in one the bottom side of the image
ketan pendharkar
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-06-11T04:16:34.173Z
sorry, I still not yet fully understood why it is much less like that, but there should be something like the mid-year numbers should be multiplied by 1000 from my humble opinion.
Phil Nguyen
<macroeconomics><statistics><population-economics>
what is 'mid-year estimate' in following chart?
ketan pendharkar
# what is 'mid-year estimate' in following chart?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2021-06-11)

If it is mid-year population then, why it is so less in comparison to 'total population'

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/yfVUw.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/yfVUw.png)

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/yfVUw.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/yfVUw.png)
[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/pp10H.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/pp10H.png)
[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/PP6OM.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/PP6OM.png)

**Tags:** macroeconomics, statistics, population-economics

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Interesting, around 1000 times difference, is there any further information apart from the Table by the way?  
> **username_0**: @BeautifulMindset SOURCE: unstats.un.org as on 5-12-2016, mentioned in one the bottom side of the image  
> **username_1**: sorry, I still not yet fully understood why it is much less like that, but there should be something like the mid-year numbers should be multiplied by 1000 from my humble opinion.  

---

## 0 answers

