<p>How to proceed with such problems where there is no pure Nash Equilibrium? Even if we attempt to eliminate strictly dominated strategies, we find none. <a href="https://i.sstatic.net/DaHsT.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/DaHsT.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-09-11T12:59:05.933Z
I don't think Nash will exist in this case, there will be no Nash equilibria.
Shubham Singh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-09-11T14:00:39.000Z
@ShubhamSingh We know there must be a Nash equilibrium because Nash's contribution was to prove that any finite game has at least one.
Ubiquitous
<game-theory>
Game Theory; Finding the Nash Equilibria
Kong
# Game Theory; Finding the Nash Equilibria

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-09-11)

How to proceed with such problems where there is no pure Nash Equilibrium? Even if we attempt to eliminate strictly dominated strategies, we find none. [![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/DaHsT.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/DaHsT.png)

**Tags:** game-theory

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: I don't think Nash will exist in this case, there will be no Nash equilibria.  
> **username_2**: @ShubhamSingh We know there must be a Nash equilibrium because Nash's contribution was to prove that any finite game has at least one.  

---

## 0 answers

