<p>This is the two-period budget constraint:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>C1 + C2/(1+r) = Y1 + Y2/(1+r)</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Derivation is straightforward. On the LHS, you have the present value of consumption (considered during period 1), and on the RHS you have the present value of income. </p>

<p>Intuitively, think about 1/(1+r) on the LHS as the price ratio between Good 1 and Good 2. Now you can solve the u-max problem as per usual. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-05-18T14:59:11.603Z
The formula C1+C2/(1+r)= Y1+Y2/(1+r) is the total wealth, what I would like to know is how to make use of the utility function , correct me if I am wrong but normaly I am supposed to have dU= two period budget constraint which will indicate the optimale choice , how do I do this ? I what I need is an explanation on how the Utility function is read and used
Amr El Aswar
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-05-18T16:35:56.463Z
You can obtain the optimal choice by equating the MRS with the price ratio. MRS is the ratio of the marginal utilities i.e. MRS = (dU/dC1)/(dU/dC2). Another method would be to substitute out either C1 or C2 from the utility function using the budget constraint, then solving a one-variable maximisation problem.
worldtea
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-05-18T16:54:27.133Z
Will take a closer look but can you please define MRS ? I am studying in french and we dont use the same notations ...
Amr El Aswar
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-05-18T18:54:21.473Z
Marginal Rate of Substitution, that is for a 1 unit reduction in Good 1, the additional amount of Good 2 that the agent needs to consume to keep his utility level the same.
worldtea
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-05-18T07:40:56.027Z
2015-05-18T07:40:56.027Z
worldtea
<p>I finally figured out how to use the utility function so I will detail so anyone who needs a detailed answer as it was quite unclear even though I was well aware of the equation :</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>C1 + C2/(1+r) = Y1 + Y2/(1+r)</p>
</blockquote>

<p>But did not know how to use it so I will explain , </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Y1 = 1000
  Y2 = 5000
  r = 0%</p>
</blockquote>

<p>So we have </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>C1+C2/(1+0)=Y1+Y2/(1+0
  C1+C2=Y1+Y2
  So C1=Y1+Y2-C2 with Y1+Y2=6000</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Replace the value of C1 in the utility function :</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>U=3×(6000-C2)×C2</p>
</blockquote>

<p>We know that utility is max when </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>dU/dC2 = 0 = -6C2+18000
  C2=3000</p>
</blockquote>

<p>To get C1 we just have to put C2 in the two period budget constraint to get </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>C1=3000</p>
</blockquote>

<p>And there it is, if i did something wrong feel free to comment </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-05-22T19:34:54.180Z
Your solution is correct, but you should study the MRS method, it is more general. For example your solution would not work in the case when
$$
U(C_1,C_2) = 3 \cdot C_1^3 \cdot C_2^4,
$$
where $C_1$ and $C_2$ are the consumptions and the upper indeces denote powers.
Giskard
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-05-22T21:33:12.790Z
@denesp can you please explain how to do it in that case please ?
Amr El Aswar
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-05-23T07:33:46.997Z
Please see the wikipedia article on Marginal Rate of Substitution. It provides a detailed explanation:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marginal_rate_of_substitution
Giskard
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-05-19T20:58:19.930Z
2015-05-19T20:58:19.930Z
Amr El Aswar
<p>Now that the OP has provided his own answer, let's also give the standard treatment of this problem.  </p>

<p>There is no production, the consumer receives windfall endowments in each period, $Y_1, Y_2$, and he can borrow (or lend) during the first period at an exogenous non-negative interest rate $r$.</p>

<p>What is the two-period budget constraint of the consumer? It is more intuitive to write it as</p>

<p>$$C_2 = Y_2 + (1+r)(Y_1-C_1) \tag{1}$$</p>

<p>The consumer can consume his second period endowment adjusted by the results of its borrowing or lending activities in the first: If his endowment is larger than his consumption in the first period, $Y_1-C_1 &gt;0$, it means that the consumer acted as a creditor, and in the second period he will receive the principal plus interest, to consume in addition to his 2nd-period endowment.</p>

<p>If $Y_1-C_1 &lt;0$ it means that the consumer acted as a borrower, and in the second period he will have to return the loan with its interest. So $(1)$ covers both cases.</p>

<p>Then the utility maximization problem is stated as</p>

<p>$$\max_{C_1,C_2} U(C_1,C_2) \\
s.t. C_2 = Y_2 + (1+r)(Y_1-C_1)  \tag{2}$$</p>

<p>We can insert the constraint into the objective function and maximize only with respect to $C_1$. So the first-order condition is</p>

<p>$$\frac {\partial U(C_1,C_2(C_1))}{\partial C_1} = 0 \tag {3}$$</p>

<p>and the second-order condition is </p>

<p>$$\frac {\partial^2 U(C_1,C_2(C_1))}{\partial C_1^2} &lt; 0 \tag {4}$$</p>

<p>at the critical point.</p>

<p>Using the specific functional form of the utility function of the question, $ U= 3C_1C_2$ we have</p>

<p>$$\frac {\partial U(C_1,C_2(C_1))}{\partial C_1} = 3C_2 - 3C_1\cdot(1+r) $$</p>

<p>$$ = 3[Y_2 + (1+r)(Y_1-C_1)] - 3(1+r)C_1$$</p>

<p>$$ = 3Y_2+ 3(1+r)Y_1 - 6(1+r)C_1 \tag{5}$$</p>

<p>Note that</p>

<p>$$\frac {\partial^2 U(C_1,C_2(C_1))}{\partial C_1^2} = -6(1+r) &lt;0$$
so the second-order condition for a maximum is satisfied.</p>

<p>Setting $(5)$ equal to zero we obtain
$$ C_1^* = \frac {Y_2}{2(1+r)}+ \frac 12 Y_1 \tag{6}$$</p>

<p>From $(6)$ we conclude that consumption in the first period will never fall below half of the period's endowment, and that it is a negative function of the interest. Moreover the consumer will find it optimal to borrow when</p>

<p>$$C_1^* &gt; Y_1 \implies   \frac {Y_2}{2(1+r)}+ \frac 12 Y_1 &gt; Y_1$$</p>

<p>$$\implies Y_2 &gt; (1+r)Y_1$$</p>

<p>Using the specific numerical assumptions of the question, $Y_1 = 1000, Y_2 = 5000, r=0$, we obtain
$$C_1^* = \frac {5000}{2}+ \frac 12 1000 = 3000 $$</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-05-22T19:36:23.190Z
2016-05-11T13:47:11.297Z
2016-05-11T13:47:11.297Z
Alecos Papadopoulos
<p>I have encountered this a lot in my exams and can not seem to understand how to use these functions here is an easy exemple :</p>

<p>A consumer who will only live 2 periods receives 1000€ in the first period and 5000€ in the second period, if the interest is at 0% how much will he consume in both periods knowing that his utility function is :</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>U(C¹,C²) = 3×C¹×C²</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Where C¹ is the consommation of first period and C² of second.</p>

<p>How do I make use of this utility function to calculate the consumption in both periods  ? </p>

<consumer-theory><utility><interest-rate><choice-theory>
intertemporal utility function usage : calculating consumption
Amr El Aswar
# intertemporal utility function usage : calculating consumption

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-05-17)

I have encountered this a lot in my exams and can not seem to understand how to use these functions here is an easy exemple :

A consumer who will only live 2 periods receives 1000€ in the first period and 5000€ in the second period, if the interest is at 0% how much will he consume in both periods knowing that his utility function is :

> U(C¹,C²) = 3×C¹×C²

Where C¹ is the consommation of first period and C² of second.

How do I make use of this utility function to calculate the consumption in both periods ?

**Tags:** consumer-theory, utility, interest-rate, choice-theory


---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2015-05-22. Score: 3 | Accepted answer

Now that the OP has provided his own answer, let's also give the standard treatment of this problem.

There is no production, the consumer receives windfall endowments in each period, $Y\_1, Y\_2$, and he can borrow (or lend) during the first period at an exogenous non-negative interest rate $r$.

What is the two-period budget constraint of the consumer? It is more intuitive to write it as

$$C\_2 = Y\_2 + (1+r)(Y\_1-C\_1) \tag{1}$$

The consumer can consume his second period endowment adjusted by the results of its borrowing or lending activities in the first: If his endowment is larger than his consumption in the first period, $Y\_1-C\_1 >0$, it means that the consumer acted as a creditor, and in the second period he will receive the principal plus interest, to consume in addition to his 2nd-period endowment.

If $Y\_1-C\_1 <0$ it means that the consumer acted as a borrower, and in the second period he will have to return the loan with its interest. So $(1)$ covers both cases.

Then the utility maximization problem is stated as

$$\max\_{C\_1,C\_2} U(C\_1,C\_2) \\
s.t. C\_2 = Y\_2 + (1+r)(Y\_1-C\_1) \tag{2}$$

We can insert the constraint into the objective function and maximize only with respect to $C\_1$. So the first-order condition is

$$\frac {\partial U(C\_1,C\_2(C\_1))}{\partial C\_1} = 0 \tag {3}$$

and the second-order condition is

$$\frac {\partial^2 U(C\_1,C\_2(C\_1))}{\partial C\_1^2} < 0 \tag {4}$$

at the critical point.

Using the specific functional form of the utility function of the question, $ U= 3C\_1C\_2$ we have

$$\frac {\partial U(C\_1,C\_2(C\_1))}{\partial C\_1} = 3C\_2 - 3C\_1\cdot(1+r) $$

$$ = 3[Y\_2 + (1+r)(Y\_1-C\_1)] - 3(1+r)C\_1$$

$$ = 3Y\_2+ 3(1+r)Y\_1 - 6(1+r)C\_1 \tag{5}$$

Note that

$$\frac {\partial^2 U(C\_1,C\_2(C\_1))}{\partial C\_1^2} = -6(1+r) <0$$
so the second-order condition for a maximum is satisfied.

Setting $(5)$ equal to zero we obtain
$$ C\_1^\* = \frac {Y\_2}{2(1+r)}+ \frac 12 Y\_1 \tag{6}$$

From $(6)$ we conclude that consumption in the first period will never fall below half of the period's endowment, and that it is a negative function of the interest. Moreover the consumer will find it optimal to borrow when

$$C\_1^\* > Y\_1 \implies \frac {Y\_2}{2(1+r)}+ \frac 12 Y\_1 > Y\_1$$

$$\implies Y\_2 > (1+r)Y\_1$$

Using the specific numerical assumptions of the question, $Y\_1 = 1000, Y\_2 = 5000, r=0$, we obtain
$$C\_1^\* = \frac {5000}{2}+ \frac 12 1000 = 3000 $$


---

### Answer by username_1 on 2015-05-18. Score: 5

This is the two-period budget constraint:

> C1 + C2/(1+r) = Y1 + Y2/(1+r)

Derivation is straightforward. On the LHS, you have the present value of consumption (considered during period 1), and on the RHS you have the present value of income.

Intuitively, think about 1/(1+r) on the LHS as the price ratio between Good 1 and Good 2. Now you can solve the u-max problem as per usual.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: The formula C1+C2/(1+r)= Y1+Y2/(1+r) is the total wealth, what I would like to know is how to make use of the utility function , correct me if I am wrong but normaly I am supposed to have dU= two period budget constraint which will indicate the optimale choice , how do I do this ? I what I need is an explanation on how the Utility function is read and used  
> **username_1**: You can obtain the optimal choice by equating the MRS with the price ratio. MRS is the ratio of the marginal utilities i.e. MRS = (dU/dC1)/(dU/dC2). Another method would be to substitute out either C1 or C2 from the utility function using the budget constraint, then solving a one-variable maximisation problem.  
> **username_0**: Will take a closer look but can you please define MRS ? I am studying in french and we dont use the same notations ...  
> **username_1**: Marginal Rate of Substitution, that is for a 1 unit reduction in Good 1, the additional amount of Good 2 that the agent needs to consume to keep his utility level the same.  

---

### Answer by username_0 on 2015-05-19. Score: 1

I finally figured out how to use the utility function so I will detail so anyone who needs a detailed answer as it was quite unclear even though I was well aware of the equation :

> C1 + C2/(1+r) = Y1 + Y2/(1+r)

But did not know how to use it so I will explain ,

> Y1 = 1000
> Y2 = 5000
> r = 0%

So we have

> C1+C2/(1+0)=Y1+Y2/(1+0
> C1+C2=Y1+Y2
> So C1=Y1+Y2-C2 with Y1+Y2=6000

Replace the value of C1 in the utility function :

> U=3×(6000-C2)×C2

We know that utility is max when

> dU/dC2 = 0 = -6C2+18000
> C2=3000

To get C1 we just have to put C2 in the two period budget constraint to get

> C1=3000

And there it is, if i did something wrong feel free to comment

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: Your solution is correct, but you should study the MRS method, it is more general. For example your solution would not work in the case when $$ U(C_1,C_2) = 3 \cdot C_1^3 \cdot C_2^4, $$ where $C_1$ and $C_2$ are the consumptions and the upper indeces denote powers.  
> **username_0**: @denesp can you please explain how to do it in that case please ?  
> **username_2**: Please see the wikipedia article on Marginal Rate of Substitution. It provides a detailed explanation:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marginal_rate_of_substitution  

---

