<p>I've tried to "fill the blanks", hope this helps.</p>

<p>$$\tilde{k} = \frac{K}{AL}$$
$$\frac{d[\tilde{k}]}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt}\left[\frac{K}{AL} \right] \quad (1)$$ 
Now we use the quocient rule: to differentiate $f(x) = \frac{g(x)}{h{x}}$ (for $h(x) \neq 0$) we can apply the formula $f'(x) = \frac{h(x)g'(x) - g(x)h'(x)}{[h(x)]^2}$. In your problem, $f(x) = \dot{k}$, $g(x) = K$ and $h(x) = AL$, but instead $x$, you have $t$. So, applying the rule in (1), we have:
$$\frac{d[\tilde{k}]}{dt} = \frac{AL\left(\frac{d[K]}{dt}\right) - K\left(\frac{d[AL]}{dt}\right)}{(AL)^2} \quad (2)$$</p>

<p>The second term in the numerator has the derivative of a product ($AL$), so we need again to use the appropriate rule: $(f(x)\cdot g(x))' = f'(x)\cdot g(x) + f(x)\cdot g'(x)$</p>

<p>So, using the rule in (2) we have:</p>

<p>$$\frac{d[\tilde{k}]}{dt} = \frac{AL\left(\frac{d[K]}{dt}\right) - K\left(L\frac{d[A]}{dt}+A\frac{d[L]}{dt}\right)}{(AL)^2}$$</p>

<p>Now we re-write using dot notation - $\dot{x} \equiv \frac{d[x]}{dt}$:</p>

<p>$$\dot{\tilde{k}} = \frac{AL\dot{K} - K(L\dot{A}+A\dot{L})}{(AL)^2} \quad = \frac{AL\dot{K}}{(AL)^2}-\frac{KL\dot{A}}{(AL)^2}-\frac{KA\dot{L}}{(AL)^2}$$</p>

<p>Since $\frac{\dot{A}}{A} = g$ and $\frac{\dot{L}}{L} = n$, we have</p>

<p>$$\dot{\tilde{k}} = \frac{\dot{K}}{AL} - Kg -  Kn = \frac{\dot{K}}{AL} -K(n+g)$$</p>

<p>ps: I'm not sure why your textbook is using dot notation over $\tilde{k}$ before taking the derivative.</p>

<p>EDIT:</p>

<p>I'm adding an alternative way to achieve the same result. </p>

<p>Starting with $\tilde{k} = \frac{K}{AL}$, you can rewrite as $K = \tilde{k}AL$.</p>

<p>Now, take log on both sides and remember that $log(ab) = log(a) + log(b)$:</p>

<p>$log(K) = log(\tilde{k}AL) = log(\tilde{k}) + log(A) + log(L) \quad (1)$</p>

<p>Now we are going to take the derivative (in t), using the log rule: if $f(x) = log(x)$, then $f'(x) = \frac{1}{x}$. But now we have to use the chain rule, because all variables are in reality functions of $t$. The chain rule is: if z depends on y and y depends on t, then z depends on t: $\frac{dz}{dt} = \frac{dz}{dy}\frac{dy}{dt}$. Using $log(K)$ as example, we have: $\frac{d}{dt}[log(K)] = \frac{d}{dK}[log(K)]\cdot \frac{d}{dt}[K]$.</p>

<p>(1) then became:
$$\frac{d}{dt}[log(K)] =  \frac{d}{dt}[log(\tilde{k})] + \frac{d}{dt}[log(A)] + \frac{d}{dt}[log(L)]$$</p>

<p>Which is...
$$\frac{d}{dK}[log(K)]\cdot \frac{d}{dt}[K] =  \frac{d}{d\tilde{k}}[log(\tilde{k})]\cdot\frac{d}{dt}[\tilde{k}] + \frac{d}{dA}[log(A)]\cdot\frac{d}{dt}[A] + \frac{d}{dL}[log(L)]\cdot\frac{d}{dt}[L]$$</p>

<p>Now we substitute all derivatives of logs and use dot notation:</p>

<p>$$\frac{1}{K}\dot{K} = \frac{1}{\tilde{k}}\dot{\tilde{k}} + \frac{1}{A}\dot{A} + \frac{1}{L}\dot{L} = \frac{\dot{\tilde{k}}}{\tilde{k}} + g + n$$</p>

<p>In the SS we have $\frac{\dot{\tilde{k}}}{\tilde{k}} = 0$, so:</p>

<p>$$\frac{\dot{K}}{K} = g + n$$</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-22T02:21:59.267Z
@Parseltongue , I added another way to compute the same result, using log before taking the derivatives.
ASchmidt
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-22T02:26:18.090Z
Fantastic work!  Thanks so much for taking the time -- I really appreciate you writing out all the steps.  VERY helpful.
Parseltongue
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-21T01:42:26.550Z
2017-02-22T02:17:57.257Z
2017-02-22T02:17:57.257Z
ASchmidt
<p>I'm taking an intro macro course, and my calculus is pretty rusty.  I'm going through some lectures notes right now where they derive the growth rate of capital in the Solow model like so:</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/4jOGj.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/4jOGj.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

<p>I'm wondering what the process is for getting to the very first step where they take the derivative with respect to time.  Generally, are there good resources for learning how to do this, as I imagine I'll be doing it a lot?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-19T22:54:49.237Z
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is a question about mathematics.
Giskard
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-20T16:08:27.457Z
Virtually all questions in economics are just mathematics questions masquerading as economics
Parseltongue
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-20T17:30:45.743Z
Some more so than others. (You may as well say all questions are about English, because they are written in words.)
Giskard
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-22T11:31:37.047Z
@Parseltongue I also voted to close this question.  There is a difference between an economic question expressed in maths, and a maths question which has application to economics, and this question (which I read as essentially how to find the derivative of $K/AL$ and what are good sources on differential calculus) seems to be the latter.  The Maths SE site has many more participants than Economics SE and my experience on asking maths questions (arising from economics) there is that helpful answers are often posted very quickly (within 1 hour).
Adam Bailey
<macroeconomics><solow>
Taking the derivative of capital per effective unit of labor in the Solow model
Parseltongue
# Taking the derivative of capital per effective unit of labor in the Solow model

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-02-19)

I'm taking an intro macro course, and my calculus is pretty rusty. I'm going through some lectures notes right now where they derive the growth rate of capital in the Solow model like so:

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/4jOGj.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/4jOGj.png)

I'm wondering what the process is for getting to the very first step where they take the derivative with respect to time. Generally, are there good resources for learning how to do this, as I imagine I'll be doing it a lot?

**Tags:** macroeconomics, solow

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is a question about mathematics.  
> **username_0**: Virtually all questions in economics are just mathematics questions masquerading as economics  
> **username_1**: Some more so than others. (You may as well say all questions are about English, because they are written in words.)  
> **username_2**: @username_0 I also voted to close this question.  There is a difference between an economic question expressed in maths, and a maths question which has application to economics, and this question (which I read as essentially how to find the derivative of $K/AL$ and what are good sources on differential calculus) seems to be the latter.  The Maths SE site has many more participants than Economics SE and my experience on asking maths questions (arising from economics) there is that helpful answers are often posted very quickly (within 1 hour).  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2017-02-21. Score: 1 | Accepted answer

I've tried to "fill the blanks", hope this helps.

$$\tilde{k} = \frac{K}{AL}$$
$$\frac{d[\tilde{k}]}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt}\left[\frac{K}{AL} \right] \quad (1)$$
Now we use the quocient rule: to differentiate $f(x) = \frac{g(x)}{h{x}}$ (for $h(x) \neq 0$) we can apply the formula $f'(x) = \frac{h(x)g'(x) - g(x)h'(x)}{[h(x)]^2}$. In your problem, $f(x) = \dot{k}$, $g(x) = K$ and $h(x) = AL$, but instead $x$, you have $t$. So, applying the rule in (1), we have:
$$\frac{d[\tilde{k}]}{dt} = \frac{AL\left(\frac{d[K]}{dt}\right) - K\left(\frac{d[AL]}{dt}\right)}{(AL)^2} \quad (2)$$

The second term in the numerator has the derivative of a product ($AL$), so we need again to use the appropriate rule: $(f(x)\cdot g(x))' = f'(x)\cdot g(x) + f(x)\cdot g'(x)$

So, using the rule in (2) we have:

$$\frac{d[\tilde{k}]}{dt} = \frac{AL\left(\frac{d[K]}{dt}\right) - K\left(L\frac{d[A]}{dt}+A\frac{d[L]}{dt}\right)}{(AL)^2}$$

Now we re-write using dot notation - $\dot{x} \equiv \frac{d[x]}{dt}$:

$$\dot{\tilde{k}} = \frac{AL\dot{K} - K(L\dot{A}+A\dot{L})}{(AL)^2} \quad = \frac{AL\dot{K}}{(AL)^2}-\frac{KL\dot{A}}{(AL)^2}-\frac{KA\dot{L}}{(AL)^2}$$

Since $\frac{\dot{A}}{A} = g$ and $\frac{\dot{L}}{L} = n$, we have

$$\dot{\tilde{k}} = \frac{\dot{K}}{AL} - Kg - Kn = \frac{\dot{K}}{AL} -K(n+g)$$

ps: I'm not sure why your textbook is using dot notation over $\tilde{k}$ before taking the derivative.

EDIT:

I'm adding an alternative way to achieve the same result.

Starting with $\tilde{k} = \frac{K}{AL}$, you can rewrite as $K = \tilde{k}AL$.

Now, take log on both sides and remember that $log(ab) = log(a) + log(b)$:

$log(K) = log(\tilde{k}AL) = log(\tilde{k}) + log(A) + log(L) \quad (1)$

Now we are going to take the derivative (in t), using the log rule: if $f(x) = log(x)$, then $f'(x) = \frac{1}{x}$. But now we have to use the chain rule, because all variables are in reality functions of $t$. The chain rule is: if z depends on y and y depends on t, then z depends on t: $\frac{dz}{dt} = \frac{dz}{dy}\frac{dy}{dt}$. Using $log(K)$ as example, we have: $\frac{d}{dt}[log(K)] = \frac{d}{dK}[log(K)]\cdot \frac{d}{dt}[K]$.

(1) then became:
$$\frac{d}{dt}[log(K)] = \frac{d}{dt}[log(\tilde{k})] + \frac{d}{dt}[log(A)] + \frac{d}{dt}[log(L)]$$

Which is...
$$\frac{d}{dK}[log(K)]\cdot \frac{d}{dt}[K] = \frac{d}{d\tilde{k}}[log(\tilde{k})]\cdot\frac{d}{dt}[\tilde{k}] + \frac{d}{dA}[log(A)]\cdot\frac{d}{dt}[A] + \frac{d}{dL}[log(L)]\cdot\frac{d}{dt}[L]$$

Now we substitute all derivatives of logs and use dot notation:

$$\frac{1}{K}\dot{K} = \frac{1}{\tilde{k}}\dot{\tilde{k}} + \frac{1}{A}\dot{A} + \frac{1}{L}\dot{L} = \frac{\dot{\tilde{k}}}{\tilde{k}} + g + n$$

In the SS we have $\frac{\dot{\tilde{k}}}{\tilde{k}} = 0$, so:

$$\frac{\dot{K}}{K} = g + n$$

> **Comments:**
> **username_3**: @username_0 , I added another way to compute the same result, using log before taking the derivatives.  
> **username_0**: Fantastic work!  Thanks so much for taking the time -- I really appreciate you writing out all the steps.  VERY helpful.  

---

