<p><em>But my question is, will the slope of the demand curve change as it moves leftward?</em></p>
<p>The slope does not change because one assumes that relative prices and consumer preferences do not change. This is a ceteris paribus interpreation you want to see what happens when new competitiors enter the market (keeping everything else as it is). There are the same consumers buying the same productons but simply less (in numbers) for that single firm. Graphically the demand curve makes a parallel shift to the left.</p>
<p><em>But I am wondering, is it possible that the demand curve intersects ATC at a point where MR = MC?</em></p>
<p>Since graphs are easier to understand than text i made a little drawing, let <span class="math-container">$D'$</span> be the competitive demand and <span class="math-container">$D$</span> the demand line that intersects the ATC (your question):</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/YKjhq.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/YKjhq.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>
<p>The short answer is no. The longer one is, that it is not an optimal outcome. Remember that <span class="math-container">$(P_m - ATC(Q_m)) \cdot Q_m$</span> is the potential profit of the firm (This is simply the difference between the ATC and demand curve, the red lines in the graph). If the demand curve interesects the ATC, there will be opportunity for the firm to change its production plan and make a positive profit. This changes the MR curve, new equilibirum will statisfy MR=MC but it will not be at the intersection point of demand and ATC curve (Points A and B). The optimal monopolistic quantity will always be greater A and smaller B because between those two points profit is greater than at the intersection points itself.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-01-05T13:56:33.013Z
Agh ha, now I see it. You really helped me out on this one. Thanks, man! I really appreciate your answer.
Underwood
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-01-05T14:12:48.470Z
If that is so i would be happy if you accept the answer :)
Levittstyle
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-01-05T14:16:52.070Z
Oops, sorry, I didn't tick it. Now it's fixed. Cheers!
Underwood
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-01-04T15:19:51.750Z
2021-01-05T15:20:38.510Z
2021-01-05T15:20:38.510Z
Levittstyle
<p>As more firms enter the market, the quantity demanded at a given price level will thus decline. Therefore, the perceived demand curve for any individual firm will continue to shift leftward until the excess profit dries up.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>But my question is, <em>will the <strong>slope</strong> of the demand curve change as it moves leftward?</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Also, there's something that caught my eyes when studying this chapter. I understand that the demand curve won't stop moving to the left until the excess profit disappears. And by that point, the following two statements will be satisfied: (a) the demand curve will be tangent to ATC, and (b) MR=MC.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>But I am wondering, <em>is it possible that the demand curve <strong>intersects</strong> ATC at a point where MR = MC?</em></p>
</blockquote>

<microeconomics><competitive-equilibrium><monopolistic-competition>
demand curve shift in a monopolistic competitive market
Underwood
# demand curve shift in a monopolistic competitive market

(Asked by: username_0 on 2021-01-04)

As more firms enter the market, the quantity demanded at a given price level will thus decline. Therefore, the perceived demand curve for any individual firm will continue to shift leftward until the excess profit dries up.

> But my question is, *will the **slope** of the demand curve change as it moves leftward?*

Also, there's something that caught my eyes when studying this chapter. I understand that the demand curve won't stop moving to the left until the excess profit disappears. And by that point, the following two statements will be satisfied: (a) the demand curve will be tangent to ATC, and (b) MR=MC.

> But I am wondering, *is it possible that the demand curve **intersects** ATC at a point where MR = MC?*

**Tags:** microeconomics, competitive-equilibrium, monopolistic-competition


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2021-01-04. Score: 1 | Accepted answer

*But my question is, will the slope of the demand curve change as it moves leftward?*

The slope does not change because one assumes that relative prices and consumer preferences do not change. This is a ceteris paribus interpreation you want to see what happens when new competitiors enter the market (keeping everything else as it is). There are the same consumers buying the same productons but simply less (in numbers) for that single firm. Graphically the demand curve makes a parallel shift to the left.

*But I am wondering, is it possible that the demand curve intersects ATC at a point where MR = MC?*

Since graphs are easier to understand than text i made a little drawing, let $D'$ be the competitive demand and $D$ the demand line that intersects the ATC (your question):

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/YKjhq.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/YKjhq.png)

The short answer is no. The longer one is, that it is not an optimal outcome. Remember that $(P\_m - ATC(Q\_m)) \cdot Q\_m$ is the potential profit of the firm (This is simply the difference between the ATC and demand curve, the red lines in the graph). If the demand curve interesects the ATC, there will be opportunity for the firm to change its production plan and make a positive profit. This changes the MR curve, new equilibirum will statisfy MR=MC but it will not be at the intersection point of demand and ATC curve (Points A and B). The optimal monopolistic quantity will always be greater A and smaller B because between those two points profit is greater than at the intersection points itself.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Agh ha, now I see it. You really helped me out on this one. Thanks, man! I really appreciate your answer.  
> **username_1**: If that is so i would be happy if you accept the answer :)  
> **username_0**: Oops, sorry, I didn't tick it. Now it's fixed. Cheers!  

---

