<p><strong><a href="http://dot-bit.org/Main_Page" rel="nofollow">Namecoin</a> is not really a BitCoin fork</strong>.  It is intended to work like DNS, not like a currency.  As to the other "forks" I would highly recommend you not take seriously digital currencies which lack the community backing of bitcoins, and are not heavily feature-differentiated from them, until or unless they prove themselves popular and reliable.  Even bitcoins themselves hardly meet this criteria, so that should give you an idea of how seriously "IXCoin" and such should be taken.</p>

<p>But the broader problem here is that you seem to be approaching bitcoins as an investment.  Bitcoins are <strong>not</strong> an investment vehicle--they are a currency.  There is no need to "diversify your holdings" because bitcoin is not a holding--it's just money.  If you don't need it to store your wealth or exchange it for something else, you're looking in the wrong place.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-03-02T05:30:06.160Z
Seems like diversifying your digital currency holdings in order to reduce your exposure to price volatility is a perfectly legitimate desire, and doesn't necessarily imply that you are treating bitcoin as an investment.
cape1232
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-08-30T23:23:21.033Z
Sorry, but I completely disagree with you about treating Bitcoin as an investment. I personally intend to BUY AND HOLD Bitcoin until they appreciate. There is some chance 1 Bitcoin will be worth > $1000 in a year or five, so it is definitely a form of investment.
ripper234
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-08-30T23:27:15.957Z
You're quite welcome to disagree, but that's a matter of speculative economics and has nothing to with BitCoin (and this site) itself.  BitCoin is a free, open-source project to create a _currency_.  The fact that you think this _currency_ is for some reason a good investment is your own business, and people reading this question need to realise that BitCoin is **not** designed as an investment vehicle.
eMansipater
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-08-30T23:29:11.490Z
A key factor in Bitcoin's design was the limited supply of coin, a feature that was put in largely to attract early adopters who will think Bitcoin will appreciate in value. This is by design, not accidental.
ripper234
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-08-30T23:34:59.280Z
@ripper234 these comments aren't intended for discussion.  If you're not clarifying the question, the answer, or both, it probably doesn't belong here.
eMansipater
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-08-30T23:38:36.750Z
True enough, let's stop it here.
ripper234
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-08-31T05:30:39.767Z
This is not an answer to the question.  The question you raise should be addressed [here](http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/237/was-bitcoin-designed-to-provide-a-medium-of-exchange-a-store-of-value-or-both)
nealmcb
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-08-31T14:58:06.287Z
Either way, people finding this question on a Bitcoin Q&A site need to hear the points I've made, as this is a common misconception that is somewhat implicit in the question.  If the question were edited to something like "Is there any easy way to obtain units of the BitCoin forks/clones?" I would happy change or remove my answer.
eMansipater
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-08-30T23:20:53.330Z
2011-08-30T23:20:53.330Z
eMansipater
<p>Sidestepping the comments about whether or not Namecoin is a fork or a separate project or whether bitcoin is an investment or a currency, I'll address the direct question asked: Is there a way to easily and automatically purchase several crypto-currencies at once? Not at present time, no.</p>

<p>Bitcoin (and its forks) is a very young project, though, and I'm sure there was a stock exchange before DJIA or S&amp;P existed. Give us time and it's very likely that something of the sort will be created - especially now that the demand has been made publicly known.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-08-31T04:31:30.550Z
2011-08-31T04:31:30.550Z
David Perry
<p>Recently there has been a spread of Bitcoin clones, starting with <a href="https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Namecoin" rel="nofollow">Namecoin</a> and following with other newer clones. There is a chance these coins will appreciate relative to Bitcoin.</p>

<p>Is there an easy way for a Bitcoin holder to automatically diversify his holding among the different crypto currencies, similar to holding an index fund or ETF instead of purchasing individual stocks?</p>

<alternatives>
Is there an easy way to diversify your Bitcoin holding among the other popular forks?
ripper234
# Is there an easy way to diversify your Bitcoin holding among the other popular forks?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2011-08-30)

Recently there has been a spread of Bitcoin clones, starting with [Namecoin](https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Namecoin) and following with other newer clones. There is a chance these coins will appreciate relative to Bitcoin.

Is there an easy way for a Bitcoin holder to automatically diversify his holding among the different crypto currencies, similar to holding an index fund or ETF instead of purchasing individual stocks?

**Tags:** alternatives


---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_4 on 2011-08-31. Score: 7 | Accepted answer

Sidestepping the comments about whether or not Namecoin is a fork or a separate project or whether bitcoin is an investment or a currency, I'll address the direct question asked: Is there a way to easily and automatically purchase several crypto-currencies at once? Not at present time, no.

Bitcoin (and its forks) is a very young project, though, and I'm sure there was a stock exchange before DJIA or S&P existed. Give us time and it's very likely that something of the sort will be created - especially now that the demand has been made publicly known.


---

### Answer by username_1 on 2011-08-30. Score: 1

**[Namecoin](http://dot-bit.org/Main_Page) is not really a BitCoin fork**. It is intended to work like DNS, not like a currency. As to the other "forks" I would highly recommend you not take seriously digital currencies which lack the community backing of bitcoins, and are not heavily feature-differentiated from them, until or unless they prove themselves popular and reliable. Even bitcoins themselves hardly meet this criteria, so that should give you an idea of how seriously "IXCoin" and such should be taken.

But the broader problem here is that you seem to be approaching bitcoins as an investment. Bitcoins are **not** an investment vehicle--they are a currency. There is no need to "diversify your holdings" because bitcoin is not a holding--it's just money. If you don't need it to store your wealth or exchange it for something else, you're looking in the wrong place.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Sorry, but I completely disagree with you about treating Bitcoin as an investment. I personally intend to BUY AND HOLD Bitcoin until they appreciate. There is some chance 1 Bitcoin will be worth > $1000 in a year or five, so it is definitely a form of investment.  
> **username_1**: You're quite welcome to disagree, but that's a matter of speculative economics and has nothing to with BitCoin (and this site) itself.  BitCoin is a free, open-source project to create a _currency_.  The fact that you think this _currency_ is for some reason a good investment is your own business, and people reading this question need to realise that BitCoin is **not** designed as an investment vehicle.  
> **username_0**: A key factor in Bitcoin's design was the limited supply of coin, a feature that was put in largely to attract early adopters who will think Bitcoin will appreciate in value. This is by design, not accidental.  
> **username_1**: @username_0 these comments aren't intended for discussion.  If you're not clarifying the question, the answer, or both, it probably doesn't belong here.  
> **username_0**: True enough, let's stop it here.  
> **username_3**: This is not an answer to the question.  The question you raise should be addressed [here](http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/237/was-bitcoin-designed-to-provide-a-medium-of-exchange-a-store-of-value-or-both)  
> **username_1**: Either way, people finding this question on a Bitcoin Q&A site need to hear the points I've made, as this is a common misconception that is somewhat implicit in the question.  If the question were edited to something like "Is there any easy way to obtain units of the BitCoin forks/clones?" I would happy change or remove my answer.  
> **username_2**: Seems like diversifying your digital currency holdings in order to reduce your exposure to price volatility is a perfectly legitimate desire, and doesn't necessarily imply that you are treating bitcoin as an investment.  

---

