<p>There's this thread on bitcoin talk:</p>

<p><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=90982.0">https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=90982.0</a></p>

<p>I personally generated this address: 1<b>Boyishness</b>fwHq3wSkCkJ7iafUdjhghfU which is the longest one I'm aware of that's not mixed case. It was generated by feeding oclvanitygen a large number of potential prefixes from a large wordlist.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-07-16T09:44:51.730Z
Cheating on what rules? The question is too vague; strictly all vanity addresses are the same length.
gosuto
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-06-04T05:17:50.800Z
If you're accepting multiple addresses, isn't that... cheating? In that sense, the bitcoin address 1QBDLYTDFHHZAABYSKGKPWKLSXZWCCJQBX is the longest vanity address generated.
Nick ODell
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-06-03T18:53:57.343Z
2013-06-03T18:53:57.343Z
ryanc
<p>Here's what vanity address I generated:</p>

<p><strong>1DETACHABLED</strong>D7hgExqScWngMrxDGtXwcX</p>

<p>This is the real word. All characters in the pattern are uppercase. The length of the pattern is 11 characters.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-06-08T12:23:39.397Z
2017-06-08T12:23:39.397Z
addrstore.com
<p>11 meaningful characters at the front:</p>
<h1><code>GEnesisReVC</code></h1>
<p>Full address: <code>1GEnesisReVCQG641yERVQgStUvqH6S9U2</code></p>
<p>The memorable part: <code>1GEnesisReVC...U2</code></p>
<p>⛓ <a href="https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1GEnesisReVCQG641yERVQgStUvqH6S9U2" rel="nofollow noreferrer">blockchain.info</a> block explorer</p>
<p>•••••</p>
<p>On Mac Pro with GPU it was 9 days to have 50% chance of <code>genesisre</code> <em>(not case sensitive, without VC)</em></p>
<p>Was using <a href="https://github.com/exploitagency/vanitygen-plus" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://github.com/exploitagency/vanitygen-plus</a></p>
<p>What I really like about this address:</p>
<ul>
<li>capitalization of <code>GEnesisRe</code></li>
<li><code>VC</code> suffix</li>
<li>memorable <code>U2</code> ending</li>
<li>capitalization right after <code>VC</code></li>
<li>capitalization just before <code>U2</code></li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
<p>OK, so right now time to raise some money and open a VC fund investing in regenerative communities - independent food, energy, water production and focus on education and new post-scarcity paradigm economy.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
<p><strong>EDIT / UPDATE:</strong> Out of curiosity tried running the command as if I was to bruteforce it with the exact capitalisation:</p>
<pre><code>Difficulty: 9883693997182075238
[20.44 Mkey/s][total 398458880][Prob 0.0%][50% in 10630.3y] 
</code></pre>
<p>With <code>-i</code> (case insensitive):</p>
<pre><code>Difficulty: 18982355007608803
[19.72 Mkey/s][total 230686720][Prob 0.0%][50% in 21.2y] 
</code></pre>
<p>Bottom line - got lucky, incredibly lucky.</p>
<hr />
<p><strong>EDIT / UPDATE:</strong></p>
<p>I wanted to send the minimal transaction (546 Satoshis) and be included in the block but they happened almost instantly, what a chance!</p>
<p><code>Don't trust, verify. Happy Bitcoin halving! Monday 11th May 2020</code></p>
<p><code>Gyf//ybT1XGwV6sOhZf0yCFn1QLmGoD+x/K3x2L+kaqBfKpM8wQb30/8wW3DUT6AQkZUiKIXMfgafQx3cT7e658=</code></p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/hjMkd.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/hjMkd.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>
<h1>I'm Craig Wright, definitely not a fraud.</h1>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-03-26T01:56:44.207Z
2024-01-25T07:46:26.160Z
2024-01-25T07:46:26.160Z
Mars Robertson
<p>Here is one we created for our nonprofit. hugpuddle.org 
it took several months for us to find it.
1HuGpUDDLEhvehXE1P6xeudqAHqKfs1BFM</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-05-15T20:51:25.047Z
2017-05-15T20:51:25.047Z
embii4u
<p>"Then again on average 1 in every 515 34-character addresses you generate won't have any digits in them other than the leading 1"</p>

<p>I think it's 1 in every 261    34 char BTC addresses. It's because there are only 9 numbers available (0 not base 58 conform):
(58/49)³³ = 261.007...</p>

<p>One can create easily long vanity addresses like someone did with this one:
1FuckYouFuckYouFuckYouFuckYouz76RT
However, the creator cannot create the priv key so money send to those addresses aren't spendable. </p>

<p>Some other Bitcoin-Vanity addresses:</p>

<ul>
<li>1LitecoiniwdBzUR84opxNeDggcTxHZwC </li>
<li>1RiPPLESiHh1vAKf2vfZDJfDQJ73UZpNb</li>
<li>1MoNEro159num18KshmWozz7bzW3cZaH5y </li>
<li>1steLLarZSNHpMG2JeJx2LoyDQJHDY6RC</li>
<li>1Zcash1bw9DNTbDkqaB67uYme44eEmtp6 </li>
<li>1Dash1Fu4orcgsJKFozDJiDy2b1bub2Qdx</li>
<li>1EtherC5LahniSffzNqKKjT6DNiqcyaTFe</li>
</ul>

<p>How to explain a newcomer that these are Bitcoin addresses ;-)</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-24T21:33:13.157Z
2019-05-24T21:54:11.880Z
2019-05-24T21:54:11.880Z
Marc O
<p>Check out this one.</p>
<p>1YouTakeRiskWhenUseBitcoin11cGozM</p>
<p>It is an actual wallet, check in an explorer.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-07-17T01:54:39.620Z
A vanity address is a special address that someone can use. To that end, you must generate a multitude of private keys and then check whether the corresponding address matches the pattern you seek. It is much easier to just make up an address and calculate the appropriate checksum which is what likely happened here (it's too long to find otherwise). In that case the user that created the address does not have the corresponding private key. This is called a _burn address_. I'd only call an address someone can spend from a vanity addresses.
Murch
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-07-17T07:57:20.920Z
It's not possible for it to be a spendable address, otherwise the hash used by bitcoin address would be insecure.
Chris Chen
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-07-18T07:54:10.170Z
Unless there is a transaction spending from that address, I doubt it's been properly generated. You can easily generate vanity-like addresses using sites like https://gobittest.appspot.com/ProofOfBurn , but you won't get the corresponding private key.
ThePiachu
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-07-16T23:00:39.993Z
2020-07-16T23:00:39.993Z
Santiago Ruiz Zuluaga
<p>It's impossible to say for sure what's a vanity address and what's generated purely at random, but <a href="http://blockexplorer.com/address/1CFBdvaiZgZPTZERqnezAtDQJuGHKoHSzg">1CFBdvaiZgZPTZERqnezAtDQJuGHKoHSzg</a> is 34 characters with no digits in it other than the initial '1'.  That may well be a vanity address.  Then again on average <a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1%2Fpow%28%2848.0%2F58%29%2C33%29jjjj">1 in every 515</a> 34-character addresses you generate won't have any digits in them other than the leading 1, so possibly not.</p>

<p>The address with the longest initial list of lower-case letters is <a href="http://blockexplorer.com/address/1yaniraswqyghuJKCRrGwJUA2HakWtRad">1yaniraswqyghuJKCRrGwJUA2HakWtRad</a>, and is clearly a vanity address since it appears in the <a href="http://blockexplorer.com/tx/751ff11286a43da5d6cf7da8f5bc736e522bbd698ec03c76c63368e5260667e6#o175">same transaction</a> as many other vanity addresses.</p>

<p><strong>Edit:</strong> I just found this one:</p>

<pre><code>1QBDLYTDFHHZAABYSKGKPWKLSXZWCCJQBX
</code></pre>

<p>It belongs to etotheipi, author of the <a href="http://bitcoinarmory.com/">Armory Bitcoin Client</a>, and was found using vanitygen, as he said in a <a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=64449.msg809780#msg809780">bitcointalk forum post</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Yessir!  I got a little crazy with vanitygen and succeeded.  It
  should've taken about 70 days of computation time but I got lucky and
  found it in about a week...  (notice no digits either, only uppercase
  letters).</p>
  
  <p>Unfortunately, it's so cool that people don't even recognize it as a
  Bitcoin address :)</p>
</blockquote>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-03-21T17:21:13.073Z
My client just generated this address `1NCEERKDRMZD7LbkRYe3FPXDqridjbWxHe` which has a 11 caps in the beginning.
Jus12
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-05-19T03:28:32.320Z
2012-05-19T04:45:19.913Z
2012-05-19T04:45:19.913Z
Chris Moore
<p>Anyone can generate a <a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=25804.0">vanity address</a> of arbitrary length with appropriate tools, it's just a matter of performing enough computations. What is the longest known vanity address anyone has generated?</p>

<wallet><address><vanity-address><tools>
What is the longest known vanity address generated?
ThePiachu
# What is the longest known vanity address generated?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2012-05-19)

Anyone can generate a [vanity address](https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=25804.0) of arbitrary length with appropriate tools, it's just a matter of performing enough computations. What is the longest known vanity address anyone has generated?

**Tags:** wallet, address, vanity-address, tools


---

## 7 answers

### Answer by username_11 on 2012-05-19. Score: 24 | Accepted answer

It's impossible to say for sure what's a vanity address and what's generated purely at random, but [1CFBdvaiZgZPTZERqnezAtDQJuGHKoHSzg](http://blockexplorer.com/address/1CFBdvaiZgZPTZERqnezAtDQJuGHKoHSzg) is 34 characters with no digits in it other than the initial '1'. That may well be a vanity address. Then again on average [1 in every 515](http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1%2Fpow%28%2848.0%2F58%29%2C33%29jjjj) 34-character addresses you generate won't have any digits in them other than the leading 1, so possibly not.

The address with the longest initial list of lower-case letters is [1yaniraswqyghuJKCRrGwJUA2HakWtRad](http://blockexplorer.com/address/1yaniraswqyghuJKCRrGwJUA2HakWtRad), and is clearly a vanity address since it appears in the [same transaction](http://blockexplorer.com/tx/751ff11286a43da5d6cf7da8f5bc736e522bbd698ec03c76c63368e5260667e6#o175) as many other vanity addresses.

**Edit:** I just found this one:

```
1QBDLYTDFHHZAABYSKGKPWKLSXZWCCJQBX

```

It belongs to etotheipi, author of the [Armory Bitcoin Client](http://bitcoinarmory.com/), and was found using vanitygen, as he said in a [bitcointalk forum post](https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=64449.msg809780#msg809780):

> Yessir! I got a little crazy with vanitygen and succeeded. It
> should've taken about 70 days of computation time but I got lucky and
> found it in about a week... (notice no digits either, only uppercase
> letters).
>
> Unfortunately, it's so cool that people don't even recognize it as a
> Bitcoin address :)

> **Comments:**
> **username_12**: My client just generated this address `1NCEERKDRMZD7LbkRYe3FPXDqridjbWxHe` which has a 11 caps in the beginning.  

---

### Answer by username_1 on 2013-06-03. Score: 8

There's this thread on bitcoin talk:

<https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=90982.0>

I personally generated this address: 1**Boyishness**fwHq3wSkCkJ7iafUdjhghfU which is the longest one I'm aware of that's not mixed case. It was generated by feeding oclvanitygen a large number of potential prefixes from a large wordlist.

> **Comments:**
> **username_3**: If you're accepting multiple addresses, isn't that... cheating? In that sense, the bitcoin address 1QBDLYTDFHHZAABYSKGKPWKLSXZWCCJQBX is the longest vanity address generated.  
> **username_2**: Cheating on what rules? The question is too vague; strictly all vanity addresses are the same length.  

---

### Answer by username_4 on 2017-06-08. Score: 2

Here's what vanity address I generated:

**1DETACHABLED**D7hgExqScWngMrxDGtXwcX

This is the real word. All characters in the pattern are uppercase. The length of the pattern is 11 characters.


---

### Answer by username_5 on 2018-03-26. Score: 1

11 meaningful characters at the front:

# `GEnesisReVC`

Full address: `1GEnesisReVCQG641yERVQgStUvqH6S9U2`

The memorable part: `1GEnesisReVC...U2`

⛓ [blockchain.info](https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1GEnesisReVCQG641yERVQgStUvqH6S9U2) block explorer

•••••

On Mac Pro with GPU it was 9 days to have 50% chance of `genesisre` *(not case sensitive, without VC)*

Was using <https://github.com/exploitagency/vanitygen-plus>

What I really like about this address:

* capitalization of `GEnesisRe`
* `VC` suffix
* memorable `U2` ending
* capitalization right after `VC`
* capitalization just before `U2`

> OK, so right now time to raise some money and open a VC fund investing in regenerative communities - independent food, energy, water production and focus on education and new post-scarcity paradigm economy.

---

**EDIT / UPDATE:** Out of curiosity tried running the command as if I was to bruteforce it with the exact capitalisation:

```
Difficulty: 9883693997182075238
[20.44 Mkey/s][total 398458880][Prob 0.0%][50% in 10630.3y] 

```

With `-i` (case insensitive):

```
Difficulty: 18982355007608803
[19.72 Mkey/s][total 230686720][Prob 0.0%][50% in 21.2y] 

```

Bottom line - got lucky, incredibly lucky.

---

**EDIT / UPDATE:**

I wanted to send the minimal transaction (546 Satoshis) and be included in the block but they happened almost instantly, what a chance!

`Don't trust, verify. Happy Bitcoin halving! Monday 11th May 2020`

`Gyf//ybT1XGwV6sOhZf0yCFn1QLmGoD+x/K3x2L+kaqBfKpM8wQb30/8wW3DUT6AQkZUiKIXMfgafQx3cT7e658=`

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/hjMkd.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/hjMkd.png)

# I'm Craig Wright, definitely not a fraud.


---

### Answer by username_6 on 2017-05-15. Score: 1

Here is one we created for our nonprofit. hugpuddle.org
it took several months for us to find it.
1HuGpUDDLEhvehXE1P6xeudqAHqKfs1BFM


---

### Answer by username_7 on 2019-05-24. Score: 0

"Then again on average 1 in every 515 34-character addresses you generate won't have any digits in them other than the leading 1"

I think it's 1 in every 261 34 char BTC addresses. It's because there are only 9 numbers available (0 not base 58 conform):
(58/49)³³ = 261.007...

One can create easily long vanity addresses like someone did with this one:
1FuckYouFuckYouFuckYouFuckYouz76RT
However, the creator cannot create the priv key so money send to those addresses aren't spendable.

Some other Bitcoin-Vanity addresses:

* 1LitecoiniwdBzUR84opxNeDggcTxHZwC
* 1RiPPLESiHh1vAKf2vfZDJfDQJ73UZpNb
* 1MoNEro159num18KshmWozz7bzW3cZaH5y
* 1steLLarZSNHpMG2JeJx2LoyDQJHDY6RC
* 1Zcash1bw9DNTbDkqaB67uYme44eEmtp6
* 1Dash1Fu4orcgsJKFozDJiDy2b1bub2Qdx
* 1EtherC5LahniSffzNqKKjT6DNiqcyaTFe

How to explain a newcomer that these are Bitcoin addresses ;-)


---

### Answer by username_8 on 2020-07-16. Score: -2

Check out this one.

1YouTakeRiskWhenUseBitcoin11cGozM

It is an actual wallet, check in an explorer.

> **Comments:**
> **username_9**: A vanity address is a special address that someone can use. To that end, you must generate a multitude of private keys and then check whether the corresponding address matches the pattern you seek. It is much easier to just make up an address and calculate the appropriate checksum which is what likely happened here (it's too long to find otherwise). In that case the user that created the address does not have the corresponding private key. This is called a _burn address_. I'd only call an address someone can spend from a vanity addresses.  
> **username_10**: It's not possible for it to be a spendable address, otherwise the hash used by bitcoin address would be insecure.  
> **username_0**: Unless there is a transaction spending from that address, I doubt it's been properly generated. You can easily generate vanity-like addresses using sites like https://gobittest.appspot.com/ProofOfBurn , but you won't get the corresponding private key.  

---

