<p>I reported a bug to that address just a week ago and had it fixed immediately:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>From: Ben Reeves &lt;support@pi.uk.com&gt; via gmail.com Apr 23 (7 days ago)<br/>
  To: Chris </p>
  
  <p>Chris,</p>
  
  <p>Thanks for the heads up. This should be fixed now.</p>
  
  <p>piuk</p>
</blockquote>

<p>I've used the same address many times in the past, too.  Sometimes I don't get a reply, sometimes I do.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-04-30T15:54:31.443Z
2012-04-30T15:54:31.443Z
Chris Moore
<p>That's the address I used to contact Ben Reeves (blockchain.info's author) a few months ago, so it should be correct. Whether it is still in his control is a different question. He is also known as <a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=17928" rel="nofollow">piuk</a> in the bitcointalk forums.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-04-30T15:48:03.840Z
Furthermore that address is written in the whois record, too.
o0'.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-04-30T13:52:34.500Z
2012-04-30T13:52:34.500Z
Meni Rosenfeld
<p>Currently blockchain.info lists that address in the "about us" page, but since the site is behaving erratically, I wonder if it's the real address or a phony one.</p>

<p>I.e. if the site was hacked, the address would likely be replaced with one the attacker has access to, so the info provided on the site itself is not very useful to determine if that address is genuine.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-04-30T18:50:30.937Z
Blockchain.info (i.e., Qkos Services LLC) is still a one-person operation and that one-person is traveling at the moment (presumably for his previously announced plan to team up with someone and build epic Bitcoin stuff).  Here's the latest: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=40264.msg875431#msg875431
Stephen Gornick
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-05-01T09:15:06.113Z
@StephenGornick sure, that was not to be intended as a criticism, I simply wanted to be sure that address was really his own.
o0'.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-05-02T22:33:28.493Z
It's worth noting that this question and answer could be edited by a number of people...
Highly Irregular
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-05-03T07:13:51.967Z
@HighlyIrregular sure, but the history remains
o0'.
<blockchain.info>
Is support@pi.uk.com the real blockchain.info's support address?
o0'.
# Is support@pi.uk.com the real blockchain.info's support address?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2012-04-30)

Currently blockchain.info lists that address in the "about us" page, but since the site is behaving erratically, I wonder if it's the real address or a phony one.

I.e. if the site was hacked, the address would likely be replaced with one the attacker has access to, so the info provided on the site itself is not very useful to determine if that address is genuine.

**Tags:** blockchain.info

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Blockchain.info (i.e., Qkos Services LLC) is still a one-person operation and that one-person is traveling at the moment (presumably for his previously announced plan to team up with someone and build epic Bitcoin stuff).  Here's the latest: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=40264.msg875431#msg875431  
> **username_0**: @username_1 sure, that was not to be intended as a criticism, I simply wanted to be sure that address was really his own.  
> **username_2**: It's worth noting that this question and answer could be edited by a number of people...  
> **username_0**: @username_2 sure, but the history remains  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_4 on 2012-04-30. Score: 4 | Accepted answer

That's the address I used to contact Ben Reeves (blockchain.info's author) a few months ago, so it should be correct. Whether it is still in his control is a different question. He is also known as [piuk](https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=17928) in the bitcointalk forums.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Furthermore that address is written in the whois record, too.  

---

### Answer by username_3 on 2012-04-30. Score: 4

I reported a bug to that address just a week ago and had it fixed immediately:

> From: Ben Reeves <support@pi.uk.com> via gmail.com Apr 23 (7 days ago)  
> To: username_3
>
> username_3,
>
> Thanks for the heads up. This should be fixed now.
>
> piuk

I've used the same address many times in the past, too. Sometimes I don't get a reply, sometimes I do.


---

