<p>Portions of this are copied from <a href="https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/32181/can-side-chains-or-pegged-chains-negatively-affect-the-security-of-bitcoin/32186#32186">my answer to Scott's question</a>.</p>

<p>This particular proposal only requires one change to Bitcoin: SPV proving.</p>

<p>SPV proving is required when you want to move Bitcoins from the sidechain to the mainchain. The idea is that rather than putting all of the rules to validate transactions on the other chain into the original Bitcoin client, Bitcoin clients would look at how much hashpower was used to secure the transaction. It's pretty clever, actually.</p>

<p>Destroying Bitcoins to fund other blockchains has always been possible.</p>

<p>One issue that I see is that I don't think there would be enough hashpower to secure the network from double spending; merged mining could probably fix that though.</p>

<p>Another weakness of the paper that I see is that it does not address what to do if someone does steal coins from the sidechain. (In other words, the Bitcoin network thinks there are 90 Bitcoins in the sidechain, but the sidechain thinks it has 100 BTC.) One possible approach would be to devalue all coins moved back to the mainchain by the percentage that was stolen. Another would be to take a flat percentage off the top of coins moved into the sidechain.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-10-28T16:11:52.087Z
2014-10-28T16:11:52.087Z
2017-04-13T12:47:33.610Z
Nick ODell
<p>What seems to be a very important paper was released this past week (<a href="http://www.blockstream.com/sidechains.pdf" rel="noreferrer">http://www.blockstream.com/sidechains.pdf</a>). It centers around the idea of 'pegged' side chains, and being able to move coins from one blockchain to another.</p>

<p>Can someone summarize how these pegged side chains would work?</p>

<p>How will they be useful for bitcoin? </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-10-31T08:42:28.540Z
Framed simply as a "how can it be useful to Bitcoin" question, has been covered; I'd like to hear how it complements what Bitcoin doesn't offer yet as this is the authors' theses.
Wizard Of Ozzie
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-10-28T16:12:03.927Z
Related: http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/32181/can-side-chains-or-pegged-chains-negatively-affect-the-security-of-bitcoin
Nick ODell
<blockchain><sidechains>
What are 'pegged' side chains are and how they will be useful for Bitcoin?
morsecoder
# What are 'pegged' side chains are and how they will be useful for Bitcoin?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2014-10-28)

What seems to be a very important paper was released this past week (<http://www.blockstream.com/sidechains.pdf>). It centers around the idea of 'pegged' side chains, and being able to move coins from one blockchain to another.

Can someone summarize how these pegged side chains would work?

How will they be useful for bitcoin?

**Tags:** blockchain, sidechains

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: Related: http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/32181/can-side-chains-or-pegged-chains-negatively-affect-the-security-of-bitcoin  
> **username_1**: Framed simply as a "how can it be useful to Bitcoin" question, has been covered; I'd like to hear how it complements what Bitcoin doesn't offer yet as this is the authors' theses.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2014-10-28. Score: 3 | Accepted answer

Portions of this are copied from [my answer to Scott's question](https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/32181/can-side-chains-or-pegged-chains-negatively-affect-the-security-of-bitcoin/32186#32186).

This particular proposal only requires one change to Bitcoin: SPV proving.

SPV proving is required when you want to move Bitcoins from the sidechain to the mainchain. The idea is that rather than putting all of the rules to validate transactions on the other chain into the original Bitcoin client, Bitcoin clients would look at how much hashpower was used to secure the transaction. It's pretty clever, actually.

Destroying Bitcoins to fund other blockchains has always been possible.

One issue that I see is that I don't think there would be enough hashpower to secure the network from double spending; merged mining could probably fix that though.

Another weakness of the paper that I see is that it does not address what to do if someone does steal coins from the sidechain. (In other words, the Bitcoin network thinks there are 90 Bitcoins in the sidechain, but the sidechain thinks it has 100 BTC.) One possible approach would be to devalue all coins moved back to the mainchain by the percentage that was stolen. Another would be to take a flat percentage off the top of coins moved into the sidechain.


---

