<blockquote>
  <p>Is the safety of bitcoin dependent on the creator of it being a trustworthy person? </p>
</blockquote>

<p>No, the safety of Bitcoin is not at all dependent on the identity of its creator.</p>

<p>The source code is public. The paper is public.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Or would it be safe to use even if it turned out the creator's day job was working at the NSA?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Again, the genesis of Bitcoin is unrelated to its current state or future state, except through the data of the blockchain.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-03-17T03:20:20.587Z
see also [have security expert vetted bitcoin source code](http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/367/have-any-cryptography-experts-vetted-the-bitcoin-source-code)
vzn
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-03-09T03:41:14.900Z
2014-03-09T03:41:14.900Z
Colin Dean
<p>He does own a LOT of bitcoins. If he chooses to dump them on the market for whatever nefarious motive, it would cause a major disruption.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-03-09T11:04:06.580Z
And a) a potential lead to unmask him, b) a great opportunity to buy cheap. ;)
Murch
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-03-17T03:28:22.180Z
he seems to own ~1/16 all bitcoins from some estimates... it would be possible to "dump" them (ie nearly "give them away" for free, quickly which would tend to be deflationary) but this is against the rational interests of anyone who wishes to maximize their own wealth.... it would be like dumping stocks.... is there any history of that such a thing being done other than during a panic?
vzn
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-04-17T11:51:46.673Z
@vzn - it's completely commonplace in markets (ie, such as the major world stock markets) that large players "dump" some of the instrument, for one sneaky reason or the other.  it's completely ok, legal, normal and commonplace, particularly in short-term scenarios
Fattie
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-03-09T03:11:02.393Z
2014-03-09T03:11:02.393Z
uminatsu
<p>Is the safety of bitcoin dependent on the creator of it being a trustworthy person? Or would it be safe to use even if it turned out the creator's day job was working at the NSA?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-03-09T11:01:42.900Z
related: [Does the creator of BitCoin hold a 'master' private key?](http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/q/9417/5406), [Do “the official bitcoin developers” control Bitcoin?](http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/q/8236/5406), [Who is Satoshi Nakamoto?](http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/q/229/5406), [Have any cryptography experts vetted the bitcoin source code?](http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/q/367/5406)
Murch
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-03-09T19:51:23.707Z
These are 2 questions in one. 1st (is looking for him really justified?) is really primarily opinion-based. The 2nd (and 3rd, which is mostly a follow-up of 2nd) isn't and I believe is legit: with all the news-frenzy about who Nakamoto really is(are?), a lot of people would potentially ask the very same question(s), regarding how much Bitcoin depends or not on their trustworthiness, identity, alive status, etc. Might be worth to change the title to the 2nd question to make it more relevant.
Joe Pineda
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-03-16T21:51:14.200Z
@JoePineda I've deleted what you described as the first question.
Golden Cuy
<trust><satoshi-nakamoto>
How much trust is placed on Satoshi Nakamoto?
Golden Cuy
# How much trust is placed on Satoshi Nakamoto?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2014-03-09)

Is the safety of bitcoin dependent on the creator of it being a trustworthy person? Or would it be safe to use even if it turned out the creator's day job was working at the NSA?

**Tags:** trust, satoshi-nakamoto

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: related: [Does the creator of BitCoin hold a 'master' private key?](http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/q/9417/5406), [Do “the official bitcoin developers” control Bitcoin?](http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/q/8236/5406), [Who is Satoshi Nakamoto?](http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/q/229/5406), [Have any cryptography experts vetted the bitcoin source code?](http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/q/367/5406)  
> **username_2**: These are 2 questions in one. 1st (is looking for him really justified?) is really primarily opinion-based. The 2nd (and 3rd, which is mostly a follow-up of 2nd) isn't and I believe is legit: with all the news-frenzy about who Nakamoto really is(are?), a lot of people would potentially ask the very same question(s), regarding how much Bitcoin depends or not on their trustworthiness, identity, alive status, etc. Might be worth to change the title to the 2nd question to make it more relevant.  
> **username_0**: @username_2 I've deleted what you described as the first question.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2014-03-09. Score: 10

> Is the safety of bitcoin dependent on the creator of it being a trustworthy person?

No, the safety of Bitcoin is not at all dependent on the identity of its creator.

The source code is public. The paper is public.

> Or would it be safe to use even if it turned out the creator's day job was working at the NSA?

Again, the genesis of Bitcoin is unrelated to its current state or future state, except through the data of the blockchain.

> **Comments:**
> **username_4**: see also [have security expert vetted bitcoin source code](http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/367/have-any-cryptography-experts-vetted-the-bitcoin-source-code)  

---

### Answer by username_5 on 2014-03-09. Score: 1

He does own a LOT of bitcoins. If he chooses to dump them on the market for whatever nefarious motive, it would cause a major disruption.

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: And a) a potential lead to unmask him, b) a great opportunity to buy cheap. ;)  
> **username_4**: he seems to own ~1/16 all bitcoins from some estimates... it would be possible to "dump" them (ie nearly "give them away" for free, quickly which would tend to be deflationary) but this is against the rational interests of anyone who wishes to maximize their own wealth.... it would be like dumping stocks.... is there any history of that such a thing being done other than during a panic?  
> **username_6**: @username_4 - it's completely commonplace in markets (ie, such as the major world stock markets) that large players "dump" some of the instrument, for one sneaky reason or the other.  it's completely ok, legal, normal and commonplace, particularly in short-term scenarios  

---

