<p>Yes it did, on April 1, 2012.</p>

<p>[removed link to chain of orphaned blocks]</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-09-11T03:08:44.687Z
I'm slightly new to this, how does that show anything?
imichaelmiers
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-09-10T23:03:31.040Z
2012-09-22T07:48:20.193Z
2012-09-22T07:48:20.193Z
Stephen Gornick
<p>Yes, it did.</p>

<pre><code>BIP: 16
Title: Pay to Script Hash
Author: Gavin Andresen &lt;gavinandresen@gmail.com&gt;
Status: Final
Type: Standards Track
Created: 2012-01-03
</code></pre>

<p>(Final is the stage after being accepted - it means that it's done.)</p>

<p><a href="https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0016.mediawiki" rel="nofollow">(Source.)</a></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-12-13T05:56:41.333Z
2014-12-13T05:56:41.333Z
Nick ODell
<p>Based on this, it seems like it did <a href="http://blockchain.info/p2sh" rel="nofollow">http://blockchain.info/p2sh</a> but it seems I can't find a definitive answer.</p>

<protocol><script><p2sh>
Did P2SH (BIP 16) get accepted?
imichaelmiers
# Did P2SH (BIP 16) get accepted?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2012-09-10)

Based on this, it seems like it did <http://blockchain.info/p2sh> but it seems I can't find a definitive answer.

**Tags:** protocol, script, p2sh


---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2012-09-10. Score: 1

Yes it did, on April 1, 2012.

[removed link to chain of orphaned blocks]

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: I'm slightly new to this, how does that show anything?  

---

### Answer by username_2 on 2014-12-13. Score: 0

Yes, it did.

```
BIP: 16
Title: Pay to Script Hash
Author: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
Status: Final
Type: Standards Track
Created: 2012-01-03

```

(Final is the stage after being accepted - it means that it's done.)

[(Source.)](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0016.mediawiki)


---

