<p>Let's say a couple people create Transaction A and instead of dandelioning it to just one person, they dandelioned it to 2. Let's say further than transaction A then gets combined with transaction B (creating transaction AB) AND gets combined with transaction C (creating transaction AC). If a miner receives both transaction AB and transaction AC, can they be safely combined into the blockchain, or can only one be chosen?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-04-27T20:56:55.180Z
Are you saying that people sign ANYONECANPAY transaction and then forward it so others can add their inputs?
Ugam Kamat
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-04-28T01:53:44.530Z
@Ugam Kamat The question is tagged Mimblewimble, where this kind of combining is always possible.
Pieter Wuille
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-04-29T00:42:03.197Z
@PieterWuille Are you implying that the answer to my question is that AB combined with AC will create a valid ABC transaction without any problems?
B T
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-04-29T00:57:05.453Z
@B T No, I'm not. I'm only correcting @Ugam Kamat's misunderstanding that this question was about Bitcoin.
Pieter Wuille
<mimblewimble>
What happens if a mimblewimble transaction gets combined into two different transactions before being posted?
B T
# What happens if a mimblewimble transaction gets combined into two different transactions before being posted?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-04-27)

Let's say a couple people create Transaction A and instead of dandelioning it to just one person, they dandelioned it to 2. Let's say further than transaction A then gets combined with transaction B (creating transaction AB) AND gets combined with transaction C (creating transaction AC). If a miner receives both transaction AB and transaction AC, can they be safely combined into the blockchain, or can only one be chosen?

**Tags:** mimblewimble

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Are you saying that people sign ANYONECANPAY transaction and then forward it so others can add their inputs?  
> **username_2**: @username_1 The question is tagged Mimblewimble, where this kind of combining is always possible.  
> **username_0**: @username_2 Are you implying that the answer to my question is that AB combined with AC will create a valid ABC transaction without any problems?  
> **username_2**: @username_0 No, I'm not. I'm only correcting @username_1's misunderstanding that this question was about Bitcoin.  

---

## 0 answers

