<p>Yes Coinbase means it's the block reward. The block reward is the 6.25 (currently) plus the sum of the fees of all the other transactions in the block.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-06-28T10:20:20.440Z
Thanks a lot! How about this page when all receivers are listed after OP_RETURN? The amounts were spent which should not happen when the tx was void right? https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/d42824ea9a2d470592506769616370eb8875f1a42bda1cb0493bc8e889af03d6
Angel Chen
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-06-28T11:26:00.880Z
@Angel - that transaction has 4 outputs. Order of outputs is not significant. One output uses OP_RETURN to store data in the blockchain. No idea why you think the transaction is void?
RedGrittyBrick
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-06-28T07:14:37.250Z
2021-06-28T07:14:37.250Z
Jannes
<p>I got lost in reading this transaction:
<a href="https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/137f0e908ed1820476e6d5ecd67dbd81610359517b6194fb61dc61631f946273" rel="nofollow noreferrer">a tx from blockchain.com</a></p>
<p>This transaction does not have an input address, instead, it says &quot;COINBASE (Newly Generated Coins)&quot;. Is it a block reward to the miner? But the amount does not add up, since it is 6.71380828 BTC rather than 6.25.
Another address as shown here
<a href="https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/16sAXi1jxhxKCfY84hubDdnFNaAhqd5t49" rel="nofollow noreferrer">OP_Return with same amount</a>
This address transfers the same amount to the same address for every block (1111111111111111111114oLvT2   0.00137500 BTC) after the OP_Return mark. Since Wikipedia said OP_Return means invalid transactions and these transfers are often marked spend. I'm wondering are these valid transactions? Otherwise, how can they be spent?
Can anybody help me out in reading these two transactions? Thanks a lot!</p>

<transactions><blockchain.info>
How to Interpret This transaction
Angel Chen
# How to Interpret This transaction

(Asked by: username_0 on 2021-06-28)

I got lost in reading this transaction:
[a tx from blockchain.com](https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/137f0e908ed1820476e6d5ecd67dbd81610359517b6194fb61dc61631f946273)

This transaction does not have an input address, instead, it says "COINBASE (Newly Generated Coins)". Is it a block reward to the miner? But the amount does not add up, since it is 6.71380828 BTC rather than 6.25.
Another address as shown here
[OP\_Return with same amount](https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/16sAXi1jxhxKCfY84hubDdnFNaAhqd5t49)
This address transfers the same amount to the same address for every block (1111111111111111111114oLvT2 0.00137500 BTC) after the OP\_Return mark. Since Wikipedia said OP\_Return means invalid transactions and these transfers are often marked spend. I'm wondering are these valid transactions? Otherwise, how can they be spent?
Can anybody help me out in reading these two transactions? Thanks a lot!

**Tags:** transactions, blockchain.info


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2021-06-28. Score: 2

Yes Coinbase means it's the block reward. The block reward is the 6.25 (currently) plus the sum of the fees of all the other transactions in the block.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Thanks a lot! How about this page when all receivers are listed after OP_RETURN? The amounts were spent which should not happen when the tx was void right? https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/d42824ea9a2d470592506769616370eb8875f1a42bda1cb0493bc8e889af03d6  
> **username_2**: @username_0 - that transaction has 4 outputs. Order of outputs is not significant. One output uses OP_RETURN to store data in the blockchain. No idea why you think the transaction is void?  

---

