<p>No this is not supported behavior. You can manually add the public keys from one multisig script into another, but a multisignature script can not be nested within another. </p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-04-10T09:25:34.247Z
It was always supported by Bitcoin Script, and there is now tools to be able to use that safely (output descriptors with Miniscript support).
Antoine Poinsot
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-04-10T09:38:07.807Z
@AntoinePoinsot: I think the question asker is asking about the equivalent of a nested MuSig2 key within a script? If he is then that wasn't possible until Schnorr (or at least an equivalent MuSig2 scheme wasn't specified for ECDSA)
Michael Folkson
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-04-10T09:54:24.337Z
I don't think he's asking about a public key aggregation scheme specifically, just about having the feature "a 2-of-3 where one of the signer is actually a 2-of-3 (or another sort of multisig)". And it's precisely one of the things Miniscript makes possible: composability. Also, you wouldn't be able to have a threshold with Musig2 directly (only by using a Taproot tree) and he's using a 2-of-3 in his question. TL;DR: both work. You can either use Miniscript or have aggregated keys in separate Taproot leaves, but i'd argue the latter is significantly more involved at the moment. :)
Antoine Poinsot
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-21T22:09:55.777Z
2016-12-21T22:09:55.777Z
Claris
<p>Update to Claris' answer in April 2023:</p>
<p>With Schnorr signatures (enabled in the Taproot soft fork that activated in November 2021) you can now generate a single Schnorr public key that is the aggregate of multiple other valid Schnorr public keys and create a single aggregated signature from them. This aggregated Schnorr public key can be nested within another multisig scheme. However, your Bitcoin address needs to be a Taproot address (SegWit v1) starting <code>bc1p....</code> rather than <code>3....</code></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-04-10T09:20:14.513Z
2023-04-10T09:20:14.513Z
Michael Folkson
<p>Can i compose a multisig address where one of the signatories is a multisig address?<br>
In order to create a multisig address we need the pubkey of the signatories.</p>

<pre><code>bitcoin­cli addmultisigaddress 2 
'["pubkey1", "pubkey2",..."pubkey(n)"]'
</code></pre>

<p>Is anything stopping me from using a multisig address as one of the signatories?</p>

<p>Essentially: can one of the signatories be a multisig address (one that currently starts with a 3).</p>

<multi-signature><musig>
Can i compose a multisig address where one of the signatories is a multisig address?
Albert S
# Can i compose a multisig address where one of the signatories is a multisig address?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2016-12-21)

Can i compose a multisig address where one of the signatories is a multisig address?  
In order to create a multisig address we need the pubkey of the signatories.

```
bitcoin­cli addmultisigaddress 2 
'["pubkey1", "pubkey2",..."pubkey(n)"]'

```

Is anything stopping me from using a multisig address as one of the signatories?

Essentially: can one of the signatories be a multisig address (one that currently starts with a 3).

**Tags:** multi-signature, musig


---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2016-12-21. Score: 1

No this is not supported behavior. You can manually add the public keys from one multisig script into another, but a multisignature script can not be nested within another.

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: It was always supported by Bitcoin Script, and there is now tools to be able to use that safely (output descriptors with Miniscript support).  
> **username_3**: @username_2: I think the question asker is asking about the equivalent of a nested MuSig2 key within a script? If he is then that wasn't possible until Schnorr (or at least an equivalent MuSig2 scheme wasn't specified for ECDSA)  
> **username_2**: I don't think he's asking about a public key aggregation scheme specifically, just about having the feature "a 2-of-3 where one of the signer is actually a 2-of-3 (or another sort of multisig)". And it's precisely one of the things Miniscript makes possible: composability. Also, you wouldn't be able to have a threshold with Musig2 directly (only by using a Taproot tree) and he's using a 2-of-3 in his question. TL;DR: both work. You can either use Miniscript or have aggregated keys in separate Taproot leaves, but i'd argue the latter is significantly more involved at the moment. :)  

---

### Answer by username_3 on 2023-04-10. Score: 0

Update to username_1' answer in April 2023:

With Schnorr signatures (enabled in the Taproot soft fork that activated in November 2021) you can now generate a single Schnorr public key that is the aggregate of multiple other valid Schnorr public keys and create a single aggregated signature from them. This aggregated Schnorr public key can be nested within another multisig scheme. However, your Bitcoin address needs to be a Taproot address (SegWit v1) starting `bc1p....` rather than `3....`


---

