<p>The <a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.03487.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">paper</a> you link to includes attacks on blockchain applications as &quot;attacks on blockchain&quot;. Personally I would restrict &quot;attacks on blockchain&quot; to literal attacks on the underlying blockchain rather than applications built on top. Regardless there are a number of theoretical attacks on blockchains (51 percent, selfish mining etc) but I don't think we have any evidence of them being executed on Bitcoin at least.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cs.cornell.edu/%7Eie53/publications/btcProcFC.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Selfish mining</a> is when miners collude to withhold newly mined blocks and start mining on top of them without announcing the newly mined block to the network. It is not an attack on the blockchain per se, rather than the profitability of other honest miners. In this case honest miners may mine a block that ends up becoming stale because they were unaware of the latest blockchain tip.</p>
<p>A <a href="https://dci.mit.edu/51-attacks" rel="nofollow noreferrer">51 percent attack</a> on the other hand is most definitely an attack on a blockchain. If a miner tried to execute a 51 percent attack (with 51 percent of the network hashrate) they could theoretically include a double spend in the chain with the most accumulated proof of work. In practice the attack may fail as full nodes on the network reject the chain with the double spend in a block and fork to a chain that doesn't include that block. This <a href="https://dci.mit.edu/51-attacks" rel="nofollow noreferrer">resource</a> from MIT highlights some examples of attempted 51 percent attacks on blockchains other than Bitcoin.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-10-10T20:35:22.420Z
2023-10-20T14:15:16.387Z
2023-10-20T14:15:16.387Z
Michael Folkson
<p>So I'm trying to learn about the security aspects of Blockchains and one of the papers I'm reading (<a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.03487.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.03487.pdf</a>) states that Forks and Orphaned Blocks can be used to attack a Blockchain. Now, I've read up on what Forks and Orphaned Blocks are, but I'm still not certain about how they can be used in order to attack a Blockchain. Can anyone help clear this up for me?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>

<blockchain><security><blockchain-fork><majority-attack><stale-block>
How can Forks and Orphan Blocks be used to attack a Blockchain?
L M 
# How can Forks and Orphan Blocks be used to attack a Blockchain?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-10-10)

So I'm trying to learn about the security aspects of Blockchains and one of the papers I'm reading (<https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.03487.pdf>) states that Forks and Orphaned Blocks can be used to attack a Blockchain. Now, I've read up on what Forks and Orphaned Blocks are, but I'm still not certain about how they can be used in order to attack a Blockchain. Can anyone help clear this up for me?

Thanks.

**Tags:** blockchain, security, blockchain-fork, majority-attack, stale-block


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2020-10-10. Score: 1 | Accepted answer

The [paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.03487.pdf) you link to includes attacks on blockchain applications as "attacks on blockchain". Personally I would restrict "attacks on blockchain" to literal attacks on the underlying blockchain rather than applications built on top. Regardless there are a number of theoretical attacks on blockchains (51 percent, selfish mining etc) but I don't think we have any evidence of them being executed on Bitcoin at least.

[Selfish mining](https://www.cs.cornell.edu/%7Eie53/publications/btcProcFC.pdf) is when miners collude to withhold newly mined blocks and start mining on top of them without announcing the newly mined block to the network. It is not an attack on the blockchain per se, rather than the profitability of other honest miners. In this case honest miners may mine a block that ends up becoming stale because they were unaware of the latest blockchain tip.

A [51 percent attack](https://dci.mit.edu/51-attacks) on the other hand is most definitely an attack on a blockchain. If a miner tried to execute a 51 percent attack (with 51 percent of the network hashrate) they could theoretically include a double spend in the chain with the most accumulated proof of work. In practice the attack may fail as full nodes on the network reject the chain with the double spend in a block and fork to a chain that doesn't include that block. This [resource](https://dci.mit.edu/51-attacks) from MIT highlights some examples of attempted 51 percent attacks on blockchains other than Bitcoin.


---

