<p>The output is fine. The key fingerprint is the same. Alan merely has several uid records in this key.</p>

<p>See for yourself:</p>

<pre><code>$ gpg --list-key 98832223
pub   4096R/98832223 2012-02-28
uid                  Alan C. Reiner (Offline Signing Key) &lt;alan@bitcoinarmory.com&gt;
uid                  Alan C. Reiner (Armory Signing Key) &lt;etotheipi@gmail.com&gt;
uid                  Alan C. Reiner (Armory Signing Key) &lt;alan.reiner@gmail.com&gt;
sub   4096R/DE6B2D74 2012-02-28
</code></pre>

<p>GnuPG simply chose to show you one of the other, completely valid uids for this key. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-11-09T03:50:52.677Z
You could email him and advise him to update what it says on the site to eliminate the confusion that spawned this question.
Colin Dean
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-11-09T03:50:16.990Z
2013-11-09T03:50:16.990Z
Colin Dean
<p>The section "Verifying Downloaded Files' at <a href="http://bitcoinarmory.com/download/" rel="nofollow">http://bitcoinarmory.com/download/</a> says that I should see the following output after running GPG:</p>

<pre><code>$ gpg --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com 98832223
gpg: requesting key 98832223 from hkp server keyserver.ubuntu.com
gpg: key 98832223: public key "Alan C. Reiner (Armory Signing Key) &lt;alan.reiner@gmail.com&gt;"
</code></pre>

<p>However when I ran it, I got:</p>

<pre><code>gpg: key 98832223: public key "Alan C. Reiner (Offline Signing Key) &lt;alan@bitcoinarmory.com&gt;" imported 
</code></pre>

<p>instead. A link I found on btcarmory.org (<a href="http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Armory+Signing" rel="nofollow">http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Armory+Signing</a>) has a result that implies that these two outputs are acceptable, but can someone please confirm that this is true?</p>

<p>Is the difference in the GPG output a concern? I only ask because of how intensely it is suggested to do this stuff! Thanks.</p>

<armory>
Bitcoin Armory Difference in GPG Output
Narcissus
# Bitcoin Armory Difference in GPG Output

(Asked by: username_0 on 2013-11-08)

The section "Verifying Downloaded Files' at <http://bitcoinarmory.com/download/> says that I should see the following output after running GPG:

```
$ gpg --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com 98832223
gpg: requesting key 98832223 from hkp server keyserver.ubuntu.com
gpg: key 98832223: public key "Alan C. Reiner (Armory Signing Key) <alan.reiner@gmail.com>"

```

However when I ran it, I got:

```
gpg: key 98832223: public key "Alan C. Reiner (Offline Signing Key) <alan@bitcoinarmory.com>" imported 

```

instead. A link I found on btcarmory.org (<http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Armory+Signing>) has a result that implies that these two outputs are acceptable, but can someone please confirm that this is true?

Is the difference in the GPG output a concern? I only ask because of how intensely it is suggested to do this stuff! Thanks.

**Tags:** armory


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2013-11-09. Score: 2 | Accepted answer

The output is fine. The key fingerprint is the same. Alan merely has several uid records in this key.

See for yourself:

```
$ gpg --list-key 98832223
pub   4096R/98832223 2012-02-28
uid                  Alan C. Reiner (Offline Signing Key) <alan@bitcoinarmory.com>
uid                  Alan C. Reiner (Armory Signing Key) <etotheipi@gmail.com>
uid                  Alan C. Reiner (Armory Signing Key) <alan.reiner@gmail.com>
sub   4096R/DE6B2D74 2012-02-28

```

GnuPG simply chose to show you one of the other, completely valid uids for this key.

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: You could email him and advise him to update what it says on the site to eliminate the confusion that spawned this question.  

---

