<p>There is no question as to whether or not someone with 51% of the hashing capacity can "control" the network (i.e., decide which transactions get mined, and receive 100% of bitcoins newly issued in each block).</p>

<p>In fact, that happened on March 12th, 2013 following the "hard fork", when a friendly 51% attack occurred so that blocks mined on the pre-v0.8 clients would become the longest chain, rather than continuing to extend the blocks created by the v0.8 client which hadn't followed a previously unrecognized limitation of the Bitcoin protocol.</p>

<p>What the party with 51% hashing capacity cannot do is more important.</p>

<p>They cannot change the rate of issuance, for example.  There are only the current 25 BTC issued per-block until block 420,000 when that will drop further, per the algorithm.  The "attacker" can double spend transactions that the attacker had made (e.g., deposit bitcoins to an exchange then withdraw some other coins before double spending against the original deposit.)</p>

<p>So with very little economic incentive to "control" the network, there is little concern that one will happen (or if it does that it will be of much significance.)</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-04-07T12:30:17.453Z
great explain tank you Stephen
BBJ3
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-04-19T11:52:33.733Z
If you have 51% of the hash power you can effectively blackmail the network, making your own policies as you go along. http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/9790/is-it-possible-for-the-miners-to-collude-to-blackmail-a-single-wealthy-address
Manish
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-04-07T01:05:04.157Z
2013-04-07T01:05:04.157Z
Stephen Gornick
<p>Can anyone with enough computing power, take over the network ? This is following from a <a href="https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/9233/why-do-the-creators-of-asics-not-just-keep-them-for-themselves/9237#comment12148_9237">previous comment</a> where I was asking :</p>

<p><em>... how can that be possible (to control the network) if mining tend asintotically to 21M ( alias the end of mining ) ? The only control is on early production of coins, not on the allover crypto-economy IMO.</em> </p>

<p>where I'd been answered like the following :</p>

<p><em>Blocks do give miners coins, but that's not their purpose. Their purpose is to keep an ordered list of transactions. By using 51% of the mining power, they can prevent transactions from getting on that list indefinitely.</em></p>

<p>What do you say ?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-04-06T20:29:27.120Z
They can certiantly do bad things, but certain protocol rules are never voted about, and can't be compromised with a majority of hashpower. [What can an attacker with 51% of hash power do?](http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/658/what-can-an-attacker-with-51-of-hash-power-do)
Nick ODell
<hashpower><majority-attack>
Is possible to control the network?
BBJ3
# Is possible to control the network?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2013-04-06)

Can anyone with enough computing power, take over the network ? This is following from a [previous comment](https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/9233/why-do-the-creators-of-asics-not-just-keep-them-for-themselves/9237#comment12148_9237) where I was asking :

*... how can that be possible (to control the network) if mining tend asintotically to 21M ( alias the end of mining ) ? The only control is on early production of coins, not on the allover crypto-economy IMO.*

where I'd been answered like the following :

*Blocks do give miners coins, but that's not their purpose. Their purpose is to keep an ordered list of transactions. By using 51% of the mining power, they can prevent transactions from getting on that list indefinitely.*

What do you say ?

**Tags:** hashpower, majority-attack

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: They can certiantly do bad things, but certain protocol rules are never voted about, and can't be compromised with a majority of hashpower. [What can an attacker with 51% of hash power do?](http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/658/what-can-an-attacker-with-51-of-hash-power-do)  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2013-04-07. Score: 2 | Accepted answer

There is no question as to whether or not someone with 51% of the hashing capacity can "control" the network (i.e., decide which transactions get mined, and receive 100% of bitcoins newly issued in each block).

In fact, that happened on March 12th, 2013 following the "hard fork", when a friendly 51% attack occurred so that blocks mined on the pre-v0.8 clients would become the longest chain, rather than continuing to extend the blocks created by the v0.8 client which hadn't followed a previously unrecognized limitation of the Bitcoin protocol.

What the party with 51% hashing capacity cannot do is more important.

They cannot change the rate of issuance, for example. There are only the current 25 BTC issued per-block until block 420,000 when that will drop further, per the algorithm. The "attacker" can double spend transactions that the attacker had made (e.g., deposit bitcoins to an exchange then withdraw some other coins before double spending against the original deposit.)

So with very little economic incentive to "control" the network, there is little concern that one will happen (or if it does that it will be of much significance.)

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: great explain tank you username_2  
> **username_3**: If you have 51% of the hash power you can effectively blackmail the network, making your own policies as you go along. http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/9790/is-it-possible-for-the-miners-to-collude-to-blackmail-a-single-wealthy-address  

---

