<p>Note that even if you don't publicly publish the donation address (thus associating the address with your site), the public blockchain would reflect that your donors all paid money to the same person.</p>

<p>While it might've been traceable anyway (especially when you spend the bitcoins), using one address does make it more obvious, and your donors might not appreciate that.</p>

<p>Whether this is actually important to you is a question only you and your donors can answer (but it probably isn't important, so using one address is fine).</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-15T00:20:40.603Z
2014-02-15T00:20:40.603Z
Tim S.
<p>A new address for each transaction is used for anonymity most of the time. For a donation website this isn't isn't that useful. Most people reuse because they feel that their address could be remembered and identified later on, even though this is hard to do it is possible.</p>

<p>Unless you want it to be hard to tell who and where the bitcoins are, it's better to reuse and not have to have a complex system that generates and keeps track of generated addresses.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-15T01:24:43.227Z
Thanks for your input. The idea of generating a new address was not that appealing too.
dibs
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-15T00:11:34.307Z
2014-02-15T00:11:34.307Z
John T
<p>Absolutely not pointless. So any answer should be read as "No, however...". </p>

<p>You are making a decision about other people's privacy which may cause them to decide to not donate. Or they may get into trouble if they do donate, depending on whether your site is wikileaks and what their government thinks about that. </p>

<p>Now that's worst case stuff and in practice it probably won't be such an issue and it's simply so much more convenient to not have to create dynamic new addresses for every visitor.</p>

<p>Hopefully stealth addresses will soon give us the best of both: a static qr code on your website yet still random new addresses for every donation.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-15T20:58:40.813Z
My site is nothing controversial so hopefully my donors are tolerant of a simple approach. The idea of one QR code to many address' sounds good. I will have to keep an eye out for this feature.
dibs
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-15T01:32:17.650Z
2014-02-15T01:32:17.650Z
Jannes
<p>When using the same address, you obviously allow everyone to check your balance.
<br>
After checking your balance, the user may think: "wow, he got so much money from donations, it should be enough for him" and he won't pay.</p>

<p>However, it's also possible: "So many person donated him, I also must do it!"</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-15T20:59:53.803Z
Good point. I guess if I notice a lull in donations I can update the address to zero the visible balance again.
dibs
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-15T09:10:02.447Z
2014-02-15T09:10:02.447Z
ripazha
<p>I'm just looking at how to implement donations on my site and also read that I should use a new address for each transaction to increase anonymity.</p>

<p>Is this an ultimately pointless practice when tied to a single private website? </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-15T06:29:45.737Z
If neither you nor your donnors care about anonymizing their donations, you could use different addresses to assess how effective different campaigns have been - how many people are donating after learning of your company via your site, how many via press, public events, etc. by using a diff. address for each. Of course, you could instead use a catchy vanity address for everything - whilst dropping the ability to measure your campaigns' effectiveness, hopefully more people will remember it and thus donate.
Joe Pineda
<address><websites><donation>
Is using a new address for each transaction pointless when applied to a donation button on a private website?
dibs
# Is using a new address for each transaction pointless when applied to a donation button on a private website?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2014-02-14)

I'm just looking at how to implement donations on my site and also read that I should use a new address for each transaction to increase anonymity.

Is this an ultimately pointless practice when tied to a single private website?

**Tags:** address, websites, donation

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: If neither you nor your donnors care about anonymizing their donations, you could use different addresses to assess how effective different campaigns have been - how many people are donating after learning of your company via your site, how many via press, public events, etc. by using a diff. address for each. Of course, you could instead use a catchy vanity address for everything - whilst dropping the ability to measure your campaigns' effectiveness, hopefully more people will remember it and thus donate.  

---

## 4 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2014-02-15. Score: 0 | Accepted answer

Note that even if you don't publicly publish the donation address (thus associating the address with your site), the public blockchain would reflect that your donors all paid money to the same person.

While it might've been traceable anyway (especially when you spend the bitcoins), using one address does make it more obvious, and your donors might not appreciate that.

Whether this is actually important to you is a question only you and your donors can answer (but it probably isn't important, so using one address is fine).


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2014-02-15. Score: 1

A new address for each transaction is used for anonymity most of the time. For a donation website this isn't isn't that useful. Most people reuse because they feel that their address could be remembered and identified later on, even though this is hard to do it is possible.

Unless you want it to be hard to tell who and where the bitcoins are, it's better to reuse and not have to have a complex system that generates and keeps track of generated addresses.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Thanks for your input. The idea of generating a new address was not that appealing too.  

---

### Answer by username_4 on 2014-02-15. Score: 0

Absolutely not pointless. So any answer should be read as "No, however...".

You are making a decision about other people's privacy which may cause them to decide to not donate. Or they may get into trouble if they do donate, depending on whether your site is wikileaks and what their government thinks about that.

Now that's worst case stuff and in practice it probably won't be such an issue and it's simply so much more convenient to not have to create dynamic new addresses for every visitor.

Hopefully stealth addresses will soon give us the best of both: a static qr code on your website yet still random new addresses for every donation.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: My site is nothing controversial so hopefully my donors are tolerant of a simple approach. The idea of one QR code to many address' sounds good. I will have to keep an eye out for this feature.  

---

### Answer by username_5 on 2014-02-15. Score: 0

When using the same address, you obviously allow everyone to check your balance.
  
After checking your balance, the user may think: "wow, he got so much money from donations, it should be enough for him" and he won't pay.

However, it's also possible: "So many person donated him, I also must do it!"

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Good point. I guess if I notice a lull in donations I can update the address to zero the visible balance again.  

---

