<p>It would be impossible to patent the Bitcoin-protocol as a whole, but it is possible to patent new codes before integrating them into the Bitcoin protocol.</p>

<p>A good example are the patents made by Blockstream. 2015/2016 </p>

<p>US Patent : US20160358165A1 </p>

<p>US Patent : US20160330034A1</p>

<p>So imagine this new codes are integrated in the Bitcoin protocol, and somebody later wants to do a fork of the new bitcoin protocol. Blockstream know has the IP ownership to this new codes inside the bitcoin protocol. They can claim a payment for licence or forbit the fork. It depents on Blockstream if they want to use this patents to make money. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-11-27T07:15:40.300Z
2017-11-27T07:15:40.300Z
laizess
<p>While what @Evil has said could be theoretically true, in practice often happens that random people patent random stuff "just because they can", and then it will have to be settled on court (with all the related problems).</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-09-15T13:58:13.487Z
While true, I imagine it would be fairly difficult for someone besides Satashi Nakamoto to make even even a somewhat plausible claim of inventorship since he the original description of Bitcoin is publicly available.
Michael McGowan
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-09-16T07:22:30.310Z
@Michael: sadly it doesn't matter if it plausible or even patentable, they can file it anyway, and it will be accepted anyway.
o0'.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-09-16T13:35:24.943Z
Well yes they can file even the most ridiculous of patents, but are you telling me that the patent examiners won't even bother doing a simple Google search to attempt to verify novelty?
Michael McGowan
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-09-16T15:23:05.060Z
@Michael: sadly, yes.
o0'.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-09-16T16:15:29.737Z
while its true that when filing a patent, the examiners do little to know research, and don't really care. A challenged patent is looked at closely by many parties, and frequently has to be decided fairly by a judge.
Evil Spork
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-09-15T13:09:01.897Z
2011-09-15T13:09:01.897Z
o0'.
<p>The Bitcoin algorithm is a mathematical equation with the block as the answer to the problem. Showing proof-of-work is the foundation of all math and science. Ask any math teacher. Whether or not it is to assure against double spending is a matter of (popular) opinion and is not an absolute 100% certainty. If a particular algorithm is somehow patented, then it would require a hard fork of the Bitcoin block chain to slightly change the algorithm. There are as many opinions about how Bitcoin should work as there are programmers and no shortage of ways it can be forked if absolutely necessary.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-02-19T18:51:44.790Z
2012-02-19T18:51:44.790Z
cbeast
<p>As long as the Bitcoin project is open source it would be very hard to claim a copyright on that code which is <a href="https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/COPYING" rel="nofollow">freely available</a> for copying.</p>

<p>Now if someone wanted to copyright a derivative work then that is possible.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-09-14T17:03:34.507Z
Copyright has nothing to do with patents.
Pieter Wuille
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-09-14T16:35:10.460Z
2011-09-14T16:35:10.460Z
Dustin Kingen
<p>To claim a patent you must be able to prove against contest that you invented the device, and have a working example that if built to the specs provided, runs. </p>

<p>As it was this Satoshi who invented bitcoin, and there are prior examples of a digital currency, it would be very hard for any one person to claim a patent so far after the fact. Some one could try, but the patent industry is built to make it hard to write a patent, easy to contest. Admitedly many companies do just that and are good at it, but anyone patenting bitcoin would have a hell of a time proving first invent.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-04-12T11:43:51.743Z
It's in no way easy to contest a patent. It's a quite expensive process.
Christian
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-09-15T14:17:52.587Z
Given that there are a few details such as known public key for Satoshi, couldn't he/she prove invention and thus patent it? While given the little we know about Satoshi, it seems unlikely; what if for some reason Satoshi decided the whole thing had not turned out as desired and wished to reign it in? Also, Satoshi may have unknowingly infringed some patents. It seems relevant to the question to ask 'what could such a patent holder do'?
Julian Noble
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-02-25T14:00:46.110Z
@JulianNoble AFAIK you have a certain grace period(a year or so) for filing a patent after publishing what you want to patent. So unless he already filed the patent, it should be too late now.
CodesInChaos
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-09-14T17:14:51.483Z
2011-09-15T02:15:02.057Z
2011-09-15T02:15:02.057Z
Evil Spork
<p>Bitcoin utilizes a proof-of-work mechanism to assure against double-spending, as well as providing an example opensource implementation.  However, some countries allow software patents, which could mean that one person/company has the ability to suddenly prevent the legal use of Satoshi Nakamoto's Bitcoin algorithms.</p>

<p>Are these Bitcoin algorithms complex enough to qualify for being patentable, and if so, in what countries might such patents be granted?  Does this pose a significant legal risk for users of Bitcoin?</p>

<legal>
Would it be possible to patent Bitcoin?
Jez
# Would it be possible to patent Bitcoin?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2011-09-14)

Bitcoin utilizes a proof-of-work mechanism to assure against double-spending, as well as providing an example opensource implementation. However, some countries allow software patents, which could mean that one person/company has the ability to suddenly prevent the legal use of Satoshi Nakamoto's Bitcoin algorithms.

Are these Bitcoin algorithms complex enough to qualify for being patentable, and if so, in what countries might such patents be granted? Does this pose a significant legal risk for users of Bitcoin?

**Tags:** legal


---

## 5 answers

### Answer by username_4 on 2011-09-14. Score: 11 | Accepted answer

To claim a patent you must be able to prove against contest that you invented the device, and have a working example that if built to the specs provided, runs.

As it was this Satoshi who invented bitcoin, and there are prior examples of a digital currency, it would be very hard for any one person to claim a patent so far after the fact. Some one could try, but the patent industry is built to make it hard to write a patent, easy to contest. Admitedly many companies do just that and are good at it, but anyone patenting bitcoin would have a hell of a time proving first invent.

> **Comments:**
> **username_9**: Given that there are a few details such as known public key for Satoshi, couldn't he/she prove invention and thus patent it? While given the little we know about Satoshi, it seems unlikely; what if for some reason Satoshi decided the whole thing had not turned out as desired and wished to reign it in? Also, Satoshi may have unknowingly infringed some patents. It seems relevant to the question to ask 'what could such a patent holder do'?  
> **username_10**: @username_9 AFAIK you have a certain grace period(a year or so) for filing a patent after publishing what you want to patent. So unless he already filed the patent, it should be too late now.  
> **username_8**: It's in no way easy to contest a patent. It's a quite expensive process.  

---

### Answer by username_1 on 2017-11-27. Score: 1

It would be impossible to patent the Bitcoin-protocol as a whole, but it is possible to patent new codes before integrating them into the Bitcoin protocol.

A good example are the patents made by Blockstream. 2015/2016

US Patent : US20160358165A1

US Patent : US20160330034A1

So imagine this new codes are integrated in the Bitcoin protocol, and somebody later wants to do a fork of the new bitcoin protocol. Blockstream know has the IP ownership to this new codes inside the bitcoin protocol. They can claim a payment for licence or forbit the fork. It depents on Blockstream if they want to use this patents to make money.


---

### Answer by username_2 on 2011-09-15. Score: 0

While what @username_4 has said could be theoretically true, in practice often happens that random people patent random stuff "just because they can", and then it will have to be settled on court (with all the related problems).

> **Comments:**
> **username_3**: While true, I imagine it would be fairly difficult for someone besides Satashi Nakamoto to make even even a somewhat plausible claim of inventorship since he the original description of Bitcoin is publicly available.  
> **username_2**: @username_3: sadly it doesn't matter if it plausible or even patentable, they can file it anyway, and it will be accepted anyway.  
> **username_3**: Well yes they can file even the most ridiculous of patents, but are you telling me that the patent examiners won't even bother doing a simple Google search to attempt to verify novelty?  
> **username_2**: @username_3: sadly, yes.  
> **username_4**: while its true that when filing a patent, the examiners do little to know research, and don't really care. A challenged patent is looked at closely by many parties, and frequently has to be decided fairly by a judge.  

---

### Answer by username_5 on 2012-02-19. Score: 0

The Bitcoin algorithm is a mathematical equation with the block as the answer to the problem. Showing proof-of-work is the foundation of all math and science. Ask any math teacher. Whether or not it is to assure against double spending is a matter of (popular) opinion and is not an absolute 100% certainty. If a particular algorithm is somehow patented, then it would require a hard fork of the Bitcoin block chain to slightly change the algorithm. There are as many opinions about how Bitcoin should work as there are programmers and no shortage of ways it can be forked if absolutely necessary.


---

### Answer by username_6 on 2011-09-14. Score: -2

As long as the Bitcoin project is open source it would be very hard to claim a copyright on that code which is [freely available](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/COPYING) for copying.

Now if someone wanted to copyright a derivative work then that is possible.

> **Comments:**
> **username_7**: Copyright has nothing to do with patents.  

---

