<p><strong>A psychological perspective</strong></p>

<p>Most currencies allow for 2 decimal places for common use because they are strongly regulated by their issuing government. Some provide 3dp, others, like the Yen provide none (integer only). It should be noted that stock exchanges offer shares priced down to 4dp but given the surrounding fees it is not economical to purchase a single share at that price so is used mainly as a multiplying factor during a bulk purchase. </p>

<p><em>Nullifying an argument</em></p>

<p>When Bitcoin was being created it was completely unknown how the economy would grow and by pushing out to 8dp it immediately nullified the standard argument of <em>"21 million bitcoins, why, that's not going to be enough to run the world - I won't bother with it"</em>. This is because the total number of currency units available becomes 21 * 1,000,000 * 100,000,000 which is 2.1 quadrillion - more than enough to run a global economy.  </p>

<p><em>Forcing developers to work up front</em></p>

<p>A secondary effect of this decision is that it sets the tone of Bitcoin as being completely apart from other currencies. No other currency operates with 8dp and this has the effect of introducing some specialised currency handling for Bitcoin calculations. This is necessary for other currencies too, but having 8dp forces the issue in the mind of a developer far more than a standard 2dp currency. </p>

<p>Once that specialised handling is in place it can be scaled further than 8dp to any number within reason and this makes Bitcoin very scalable. If the time should come that 2.1q units is not enough, then the code can be altered to accommodate the new demand.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-12-17T05:37:27.087Z
FYI - most currencies are traded to the 4dp.
user6972
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-10-20T19:19:32.143Z
`(21e6*1e8)/7e9 = 300,000`. Assuming an average net worth per person of $30,000, a satoshi can only be split down to $0.10 if it were globally adopted.
Mateen Ulhaq
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-10-21T10:20:37.017Z
$30,000 is 2x the [average global wage](http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17512040) so $0.5 is probably closer. And then there are inflationary effects devaluing that dollar daily but I take your point.
Gary
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-05-15T09:45:28.740Z
+1 @Meni's answer is more concise and to the point, i.e. quite better than this one given the question. **But** this one is still good and interesting, so it's definitely worth keeping and upvoting.
o0'.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-05-15T20:26:09.560Z
@Lohoris Thanks - that was what I was aiming for (and thanks to Meni for the correction d'oh!)
Gary
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-05-15T08:44:30.080Z
2012-05-15T09:41:43.587Z
2012-05-15T09:41:43.587Z
Gary
<p>Bitcoin amounts in the protocol and software are expressed as an integer number of "satoshis". 1 BTC is defined as 10^8 satoshis. So a block reward that is internally represented as 5*10^9 satoshis is displayed in the GUI as 50 BTC.</p>

<p>Splitting bitcoins to even smaller fractions will require a change in the protocol and software, and may be done when their value becomes much larger.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-05-14T10:28:03.520Z
2012-05-14T10:28:03.520Z
Meni Rosenfeld
<p>I didn't study the inner workings of Bitcoin (yet), but already since when I just started using it, I wondered <strong>why a Bitcoin can be split up in parts</strong>.
Because there is a limit on the amount of Bitcoin that can be mined ever, fractioning Bitcoins is a huge advantage, especially if it's popularity increases.
<em>Is there a limit on splitting Bitcoins into pieces?</em></p>

<p>EDIT:<br>
I just found in this answer that BTC has a maximum of 8 decimals. Is it a good assumption then that every "BTC" consists of 10^8 smaller parts? So every block does not consist of 50 1-BTC parts, but 50*10^8 smaller parts?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-12-17T02:59:37.623Z
It is presumed that the value of the Bitcoin is going to go up. If people can't afford one BItcoin they can afford a part of it.
Tracks
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-05-14T11:51:13.210Z
Miners aren't awarded millions of "pieces": their accounts are just credited with an integer number of BTC base units ("satoshis"). When they transfer that BTC, the balance of their account is reduced and the balance of the recipient's account is increased. (This isn't exactly how it works, but it's close.)
theymos
<protocol><block><satoshi><money><divisibility>
Why can we have small fractions of a Bitcoin?
Steven Roose
# Why can we have small fractions of a Bitcoin?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2012-05-14)

I didn't study the inner workings of Bitcoin (yet), but already since when I just started using it, I wondered **why a Bitcoin can be split up in parts**.
Because there is a limit on the amount of Bitcoin that can be mined ever, fractioning Bitcoins is a huge advantage, especially if it's popularity increases.
*Is there a limit on splitting Bitcoins into pieces?*

EDIT:  
I just found in this answer that BTC has a maximum of 8 decimals. Is it a good assumption then that every "BTC" consists of 10^8 smaller parts? So every block does not consist of 50 1-BTC parts, but 50\*10^8 smaller parts?

**Tags:** protocol, block, satoshi, money, divisibility

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: Miners aren't awarded millions of "pieces": their accounts are just credited with an integer number of BTC base units ("satoshis"). When they transfer that BTC, the balance of their account is reduced and the balance of the recipient's account is increased. (This isn't exactly how it works, but it's close.)  
> **username_1**: It is presumed that the value of the Bitcoin is going to go up. If people can't afford one BItcoin they can afford a part of it.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_7 on 2012-05-14. Score: 18 | Accepted answer

Bitcoin amounts in the protocol and software are expressed as an integer number of "satoshis". 1 BTC is defined as 10^8 satoshis. So a block reward that is internally represented as 5\*10^9 satoshis is displayed in the GUI as 50 BTC.

Splitting bitcoins to even smaller fractions will require a change in the protocol and software, and may be done when their value becomes much larger.


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2012-05-15. Score: 9

**A psychological perspective**

Most currencies allow for 2 decimal places for common use because they are strongly regulated by their issuing government. Some provide 3dp, others, like the Yen provide none (integer only). It should be noted that stock exchanges offer shares priced down to 4dp but given the surrounding fees it is not economical to purchase a single share at that price so is used mainly as a multiplying factor during a bulk purchase.

*Nullifying an argument*

When Bitcoin was being created it was completely unknown how the economy would grow and by pushing out to 8dp it immediately nullified the standard argument of *"21 million bitcoins, why, that's not going to be enough to run the world - I won't bother with it"*. This is because the total number of currency units available becomes 21 \* 1,000,000 \* 100,000,000 which is 2.1 quadrillion - more than enough to run a global economy.

*Forcing developers to work up front*

A secondary effect of this decision is that it sets the tone of Bitcoin as being completely apart from other currencies. No other currency operates with 8dp and this has the effect of introducing some specialised currency handling for Bitcoin calculations. This is necessary for other currencies too, but having 8dp forces the issue in the mind of a developer far more than a standard 2dp currency.

Once that specialised handling is in place it can be scaled further than 8dp to any number within reason and this makes Bitcoin very scalable. If the time should come that 2.1q units is not enough, then the code can be altered to accommodate the new demand.

> **Comments:**
> **username_6**: +1 @username_7's answer is more concise and to the point, i.e. quite better than this one given the question. **But** this one is still good and interesting, so it's definitely worth keeping and upvoting.  
> **username_3**: @Lohoris Thanks - that was what I was aiming for (and thanks to username_7 for the correction d'oh!)  
> **username_4**: FYI - most currencies are traded to the 4dp.  
> **username_5**: `(21e6*1e8)/7e9 = 300,000`. Assuming an average net worth per person of $30,000, a satoshi can only be split down to $0.10 if it were globally adopted.  
> **username_3**: $30,000 is 2x the [average global wage](http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17512040) so $0.5 is probably closer. And then there are inflationary effects devaluing that dollar daily but I take your point.  

---

