<p>While the Genesis block is timestamped 3rd of January, the hash of the Genesis block is astonishingly low. It has been theorized that Satoshi set himself a more challenging target for the Genesis block than strictly necessary and it might have taken some time until the block was found. It is also possible that he set the earlier date to match the headline of the Times which juxtaposed his goals so nicely.</p>
<p>Beyond that, the original software was designed <a href="https://github.com/JeremyRubin/satoshis-version/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L2255" rel="nofollow noreferrer">not to start mining until it had found another peer</a> on the network. Bitcoin 0.1 was only <a href="https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/emails/cryptography/16/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">announced to the mailing list</a> on the 8th of January at 19:27 UTC, and then the second node would have only appeared on the network once someone else’s interest was piqued enough to downloaded and run the software. <a href="https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/block/1" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Block 1</a> is timestamped 2009-01-09 2:54 UTC, 7 hours and 27 minutes after the email announcement.</p>
<p>While, Difficulty 1 was hard enough that it took until December 2009 for the difficulty to increase for the first time, it only took until 4:12 UTC for the next ten blocks (~7.8 min per block) to be published, so the gap between announcement and Block 1 is probably best explained by the second node only coming online shortly before Block 1.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-09-23T13:16:08.013Z
2023-05-26T13:11:53.323Z
2023-05-26T13:11:53.323Z
Murch
<p>I remember reading somewhere that it was because Satoshi wanted to make sure everyone had time to download the client and setup everything, but now that I think about it I’m not satisfied with this response (and I can’t find where I read that anymore). Everybody that downloaded the client waited 5 days to start mining? Why would they? Because Satoshi asked them?</p>
<p>Do we have a clear explication as to why there is 5 days between Genesis and block 1?</p>

<history><genesis-block><satoshi-nakamoto>
Why is there a 5 days gap between genesis and block 1?
Solal
# Why is there a 5 days gap between genesis and block 1?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2022-09-23)

I remember reading somewhere that it was because Satoshi wanted to make sure everyone had time to download the client and setup everything, but now that I think about it I’m not satisfied with this response (and I can’t find where I read that anymore). Everybody that downloaded the client waited 5 days to start mining? Why would they? Because Satoshi asked them?

Do we have a clear explication as to why there is 5 days between Genesis and block 1?

**Tags:** history, genesis-block, satoshi-nakamoto


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2022-09-23. Score: 13 | Accepted answer

While the Genesis block is timestamped 3rd of January, the hash of the Genesis block is astonishingly low. It has been theorized that Satoshi set himself a more challenging target for the Genesis block than strictly necessary and it might have taken some time until the block was found. It is also possible that he set the earlier date to match the headline of the Times which juxtaposed his goals so nicely.

Beyond that, the original software was designed [not to start mining until it had found another peer](https://github.com/JeremyRubin/satoshis-version/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L2255) on the network. Bitcoin 0.1 was only [announced to the mailing list](https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/emails/cryptography/16/) on the 8th of January at 19:27 UTC, and then the second node would have only appeared on the network once someone else’s interest was piqued enough to downloaded and run the software. [Block 1](https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/block/1) is timestamped 2009-01-09 2:54 UTC, 7 hours and 27 minutes after the email announcement.

While, Difficulty 1 was hard enough that it took until December 2009 for the difficulty to increase for the first time, it only took until 4:12 UTC for the next ten blocks (~7.8 min per block) to be published, so the gap between announcement and Block 1 is probably best explained by the second node only coming online shortly before Block 1.


---

