<p>Yes. On their <a href="https://www.bitmaintech.com/productDetail.htm?pid=00020141223034607777DtzESHvI06C9" rel="nofollow">sales listing</a> they note specifically that they have passed FCC and CE approval, and their products bear the markings for this accordingly. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-07T18:39:54.467Z
2015-04-07T18:39:54.467Z
Claris
<p>I don't believe they are shooting straight - I have noticed strong emissions in the UHF and VHF ranges.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-01-05T00:03:06.403Z
That is why semiconductor devices should be shielded - I am guessing they are intended to be arranged in a metallic case to keep emissions down. I have also had issues with one miner's spurious emissions disconnecting the adjacent miner's wifi by destroying the signal to noise ratio.
TheGoodDoctor
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-01-05T01:06:16.207Z
How strong of emissions, and how did you measure them?
Nick ODell
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-01-04T23:59:40.950Z
2016-01-04T23:59:40.950Z
TheGoodDoctor
<p>Do AntMiners comply with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_47_CFR_Part_15" rel="nofollow">Part 15</a> of the U.S. Federal Communication Commission's rules and regulations?</p>

<p>I tagged this question with "safety" because implicit in my question is what percentage of watts going into an AntMiner get converted to RF interference. If it's a lot, it could be a safety issue, especially since the cases of many AntMiners (e.g., S5s) are open and thus do not act as Faraday cages.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-07T16:52:25.420Z
Why is this tagged `safety`? [Part 15](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_47_CFR_Part_15) regulates electronic interference.
Nick ODell
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-07T16:56:54.940Z
@NickODell See ¶2 that I added to my question.
Geremia
<safety><antminer>
Do AntMiners comply with FCC Part 15?
Geremia
# Do AntMiners comply with FCC Part 15?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-04-07)

Do AntMiners comply with [Part 15](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_47_CFR_Part_15) of the U.S. Federal Communication Commission's rules and regulations?

I tagged this question with "safety" because implicit in my question is what percentage of watts going into an AntMiner get converted to RF interference. If it's a lot, it could be a safety issue, especially since the cases of many AntMiners (e.g., S5s) are open and thus do not act as Faraday cages.

**Tags:** safety, antminer

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Why is this tagged `safety`? [Part 15](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_47_CFR_Part_15) regulates electronic interference.  
> **username_0**: @username_1 See ¶2 that I added to my question.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2015-04-07. Score: 1 | Accepted answer

Yes. On their [sales listing](https://www.bitmaintech.com/productDetail.htm?pid=00020141223034607777DtzESHvI06C9) they note specifically that they have passed FCC and CE approval, and their products bear the markings for this accordingly.


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2016-01-04. Score: -1

I don't believe they are shooting straight - I have noticed strong emissions in the UHF and VHF ranges.

> **Comments:**
> **username_3**: That is why semiconductor devices should be shielded - I am guessing they are intended to be arranged in a metallic case to keep emissions down. I have also had issues with one miner's spurious emissions disconnecting the adjacent miner's wifi by destroying the signal to noise ratio.  
> **username_1**: How strong of emissions, and how did you measure them?  

---

