<p>A wallet and an address are <em>not</em> the same thing.</p>

<p>An <strong>address</strong> is a Bitcoin public key to which transactions can be sent. This concept is present in the Bitcoin protocol itself.</p>

<p>A <strong>wallet</strong> is a collection of private keys that correspond to addresses. A private key is necessary to spend from an address. The concept of a wallet is present only in Bitcoin clients. The format of the wallet is stereotypically a text file on disk, but may differ between clients and have highly important features such as encryption and address labeling.</p>

<p>Terminology-wise, one <em>sends Bitcoin to or receives it from an address</em> and one <em>encrypts, exports, backs up, and imports their wallet</em>.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-08-31T23:13:32.943Z
"Receiving from an address" is misleading. You can indeed potentially identify the addresses the inputs of a transaction crediting you were previously assigned to, but that's not guaranteed, and will not necessarily result in a single address/value pair. Coins (transaction outputs) are assigned to addresses, and get produced/consumed by transactions.
Pieter Wuille
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-08-31T23:25:00.237Z
Good clarification.
Colin Dean
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-09-13T08:29:37.897Z
1. It is more accurate to say that an address is a Base58-encoded hash of a public key. While an address represents a public key, they are not the same thing. 2. More generally, an address can represent an arbitrary script, not just a public key. 3. The "wallet" concept is more general than just Bitcoin clients, e.g. brain wallets and paper wallets.
Meni Rosenfeld
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-08-31T22:29:17.690Z
2013-09-13T08:26:59.807Z
2013-09-13T08:26:59.807Z
Colin Dean
<p>A wallet is a lot (or collection) of addresses.</p>

<p>An address is a place to send (Bitcoin) from and towards.</p>

<p>Like a key (address) and a keyring (wallet/addresses)!</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-09-01T01:00:20.037Z
2013-09-01T01:00:20.037Z
Lodewijk
<p><strong>Addresses are public-key hashes of an asymmetric key pair</strong></p>
<p>An <em>address</em> represents a <a href="https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Technical_background_of_version_1_Bitcoin_addresses" rel="noreferrer">hash</a> of a public key of an <a href="https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-is-a-private-key-and-a-public-key">asymmetric key pair</a>.¹ The owner of the key pair can use the private key to sign transactions or messages (for example in order to prove ownership). Only by using the correct private key a valid signature may be created, which then anyone can verify as valid by using the associated address (which, again, represents the public key).</p>
<p><strong>Wallets are an abstract concept, a &quot;keyring&quot;</strong></p>
<p>A <em>wallet</em> is an abstract construct, which contains the set of public and private key pairs randomly generated for the user. In a deterministic wallet, the keys are derived from a passphrase (a specific seed, masterkey or password) instead of a random seed. Essentially, it corresponds to a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyring_%28cryptography%29" rel="noreferrer">keyring</a> in the cryptographic sense.</p>
<p>The Bitcoin client software abstracts the wallet for the user such that it checks each of the addresses contained in the wallet, whether there are any balances (<em>transaction outputs</em>) associated in the blockchain with them. It sums the funds up and presents them as a single total balance. Underlying, however, these balances are stored publicly in the blockchain (that's right, the wallet doesn't contain your coins, it just allows you to spend them). They are split up to numerous addresses and transaction outputs:</p>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>Address #15521² has</li>
<li>3 BTC in transaction output 1</li>
<li>Address #23414 has</li>
<li>1.2 BTC in transaction output 1</li>
<li>0.7 BTC in transaction output 2</li>
<li>...</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>Everyone can see them, however, usually can't determine the identity of the owner.</p>
<hr />
<p>¹ To be more accurate an address is a Base58-encoded hash of the public key.</p>
<p>² <a href="https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Address" rel="noreferrer">Of course, <em>real addresses</em> actually are alphanumeric strings with up to 34 characters.</a></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-09-13T08:34:50.300Z
Deterministic wallets are not necessarily brainwallet. The latter uses a human-generated (or human-remembered) seed for key generation, but this is not necessary. The seed or master key can also just be stored on a computer sysyem, which still means a deterministic wallet but no brainwallet.
Pieter Wuille
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-09-13T11:08:47.860Z
Thanks, I guess passphrase is somewhat ambiguous, edited for clarification.
Murch
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-21T04:47:28.350Z
so an outgoing transfer would give a negative balance under that address? E.g. in the quoted block could you have "-0.5BTC at output 3"?
jiggunjer
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-21T20:30:56.523Z
@jiggunjer: No, there are no negative balances in Bitcoin. An outgoing transfer would spend (and remove) one of the balances. Unless the sent amount matches the removed balance it would additionally create a new balance for the sender with the change amount.
Murch
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-22T01:18:58.160Z
@Murch I see. In the case of a remainder, is that new change balance put under a new address? Or can it be put back under the same address?
jiggunjer
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-22T01:59:26.000Z
@jiggunjer: usually a new one, although reusing is not forbidden.
Murch
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-22T02:56:35.960Z
Would it be more technically accurate to call "balances" UTXOs?
jiggunjer
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-22T04:51:41.707Z
@jiggunjer Yes, indeed.
Murch
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-10-02T04:38:24.820Z
@JamesWierzba: The amount of data required to reference a UTXO is independent of the address that it was sent to.
Murch
CC BY-SA 4.0
2013-09-13T01:10:49.227Z
2020-10-10T00:27:13.670Z
2020-10-10T00:27:13.670Z
Murch
<p>Bitcoin seems to have the concept of a wallet and an address. Are they the same thing? If not, how do they differ?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-09-02T00:24:17.553Z
possible duplicate of [Wallets vs Addresses](http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/7807/wallets-vs-addresses)
Stephen Gornick
<wallet><address>
What's the difference between a wallet and an address?
Colin Dean
# What's the difference between a wallet and an address?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2013-08-31)

Bitcoin seems to have the concept of a wallet and an address. Are they the same thing? If not, how do they differ?

**Tags:** wallet, address

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: possible duplicate of [Wallets vs Addresses](http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/7807/wallets-vs-addresses)  

---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_5 on 2013-09-13. Score: 33 | Accepted answer

**Addresses are public-key hashes of an asymmetric key pair**

An *address* represents a [hash](https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Technical_background_of_version_1_Bitcoin_addresses) of a public key of an [asymmetric key pair](https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-is-a-private-key-and-a-public-key).¹ The owner of the key pair can use the private key to sign transactions or messages (for example in order to prove ownership). Only by using the correct private key a valid signature may be created, which then anyone can verify as valid by using the associated address (which, again, represents the public key).

**Wallets are an abstract concept, a "keyring"**

A *wallet* is an abstract construct, which contains the set of public and private key pairs randomly generated for the user. In a deterministic wallet, the keys are derived from a passphrase (a specific seed, masterkey or password) instead of a random seed. Essentially, it corresponds to a [keyring](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyring_%28cryptography%29) in the cryptographic sense.

The Bitcoin client software abstracts the wallet for the user such that it checks each of the addresses contained in the wallet, whether there are any balances (*transaction outputs*) associated in the blockchain with them. It sums the funds up and presents them as a single total balance. Underlying, however, these balances are stored publicly in the blockchain (that's right, the wallet doesn't contain your coins, it just allows you to spend them). They are split up to numerous addresses and transaction outputs:

> * Address #15521² has
> * 3 BTC in transaction output 1
> * Address #23414 has
> * 1.2 BTC in transaction output 1
> * 0.7 BTC in transaction output 2
> * ...

Everyone can see them, however, usually can't determine the identity of the owner.

---

¹ To be more accurate an address is a Base58-encoded hash of the public key.

² [Of course, *real addresses* actually are alphanumeric strings with up to 34 characters.](https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Address)

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: Deterministic wallets are not necessarily brainwallet. The latter uses a human-generated (or human-remembered) seed for key generation, but this is not necessary. The seed or master key can also just be stored on a computer sysyem, which still means a deterministic wallet but no brainwallet.  
> **username_5**: Thanks, I guess passphrase is somewhat ambiguous, edited for clarification.  
> **username_6**: so an outgoing transfer would give a negative balance under that address? E.g. in the quoted block could you have "-0.5BTC at output 3"?  
> **username_5**: @username_6: No, there are no negative balances in Bitcoin. An outgoing transfer would spend (and remove) one of the balances. Unless the sent amount matches the removed balance it would additionally create a new balance for the sender with the change amount.  
> **username_6**: @username_5 I see. In the case of a remainder, is that new change balance put under a new address? Or can it be put back under the same address?  
> **username_5**: @username_6: usually a new one, although reusing is not forbidden.  
> **username_6**: Would it be more technically accurate to call "balances" UTXOs?  
> **username_5**: @username_6 Yes, indeed.  
> **username_5**: @JamesWierzba: The amount of data required to reference a UTXO is independent of the address that it was sent to.  

---

### Answer by username_0 on 2013-08-31. Score: 8

A wallet and an address are *not* the same thing.

An **address** is a Bitcoin public key to which transactions can be sent. This concept is present in the Bitcoin protocol itself.

A **wallet** is a collection of private keys that correspond to addresses. A private key is necessary to spend from an address. The concept of a wallet is present only in Bitcoin clients. The format of the wallet is stereotypically a text file on disk, but may differ between clients and have highly important features such as encryption and address labeling.

Terminology-wise, one *sends Bitcoin to or receives it from an address* and one *encrypts, exports, backs up, and imports their wallet*.

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: "Receiving from an address" is misleading. You can indeed potentially identify the addresses the inputs of a transaction crediting you were previously assigned to, but that's not guaranteed, and will not necessarily result in a single address/value pair. Coins (transaction outputs) are assigned to addresses, and get produced/consumed by transactions.  
> **username_0**: Good clarification.  
> **username_3**: 1. It is more accurate to say that an address is a Base58-encoded hash of a public key. While an address represents a public key, they are not the same thing. 2. More generally, an address can represent an arbitrary script, not just a public key. 3. The "wallet" concept is more general than just Bitcoin clients, e.g. brain wallets and paper wallets.  

---

### Answer by username_4 on 2013-09-01. Score: 6

A wallet is a lot (or collection) of addresses.

An address is a place to send (Bitcoin) from and towards.

Like a key (address) and a keyring (wallet/addresses)!


---

