<p>Nvidia +cuda miner need high PCIe bandwidth while Radeon/AMD+cgminer use very small PCIe bandwidth so using 1x to 16x riser doesn't give any speed reduction</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-12-23T14:37:56.430Z
But I am getting lower rate (VEGA 64) when using riser with xmr-stak-amd
MD TAREQ HASSAN
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-03-16T10:53:09.557Z
2014-03-16T10:53:09.557Z
Bedjo
<p>It would seem that the GPU cards plugged into a motherboard will transfer on the PCI-e x16 bus, but after plugged into a extension header will only be able use the PCI-e x1 bus.  May make a difference. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-04-06T18:56:02.027Z
2018-04-06T18:56:02.027Z
marco
<p>Basically the effects would be negligible, so no. The risers would on a very tiny scale slow down the transmission of block information between the card and the motherboard however the transmission of data is not the bottle-neck when it comes to 'mining' since the actual size of the data files is quite small on the order of Mega bytes in size. The  bottle neck in mining speed comes from the cards ability brute force calculate in-order to decrypt the block-chain. This is another reason 16x pcie card slots are not any faster than 1x slots because the rating refers to data transmission and is only really important to video intensive use, like gammers.  </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-27T16:53:28.870Z
Even if the motherboard is first going through a USB controller/cable and then to the video card?
Scott
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-02-01T09:26:29.860Z
I would say that is negligible to, you are correct to say it will slow things down just not anything to worry about.
HappyBob
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-27T11:48:55.387Z
2014-02-27T11:48:55.387Z
HappyBob
<p>2/24/18: Having the same issue - I use an ASUS B250 MINING EXPERT with GeIL Pristine 4GB and Intel Core i3-6100T. 2:  RAIDMAX RX-1000AP-S 1000W and 1: Corsair RM450</p>

<p>The RM450 runs the motherboard, SSD  while the 2: 1000W runs 10: Ver006C Mining Dedicated PCIe Riser Card and the 2: MSI RX480 ARMOR 8GB, 2: XFX RX480 CORE 4GB, 1: MSI RX 570 ARMOR 8GB, 5: MSI RX580 ARMOR 8GB.  The RIG is stable no doubt, performs great! </p>

<p>"BUT I know it can be better!"</p>

<p><strong>The same problem occurs with loss in hash rate about 80-90 H/s per card. All i did was move from the PCIe 16x long slot on the old computer i use for bios modding to the riser cards on my main rig with the ASUS B250 Mining Expert.</strong></p>

<p><em>Example:</em> After Bios MOD - Mining XLC Leviar Coins, I am currently getting 816 H/s with one RX580.  I used this same RX580 in my ECS P67H2-A2 BlackEdition running in the PCIe 16x Long Slot. Started EthOS / SGminer on a thumb drive. <strong>The RX580 solo in the PCIe 16x Long Slot was hashing it out at 905-915 H/s.!</strong> </p>

<p>****I do not understand the 80-90 h/s difference from the PCIe16x Long slot vs Ver006C Mining  PCIe Riser Card**  There is definitely a loss of hash rate and it is very annoying. <strong>With 10 Cards- I am losing almost 1000 H/s</strong>  Like others say, no mater what setting you change it is throttled like a bottle neck. I hope someone can provide some insight on this issue.**</p>

<p><strong>Makes you want to run 10 solo rigs to gain back my 1000H/s loss.</strong></p>

<p>Thanks for reading...   </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-02-25T16:06:00.447Z
Do you think there is any difference with the USB 2.0 and the USB 3.0 risers? or does the bottleneck exist elsewhere in the system?  And do you see some of the GPUs hashing significantly higher than others?  Thanks for sharing your experience.
Scott
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-02-24T23:28:52.997Z
2018-02-24T23:28:52.997Z
Fratracide
<p>If you can make them fit they have PCI full ribbon cables.depending on the algo/ coin you need lanes. I researched/found this because I was building a folding coin rig which is more computational but it does help with mining.</p>
<p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/Veotn.png" alt="enter image description here" /></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-01-21T22:59:28.087Z
For what it's worth, being able to add extra gpus at 90% efficiency trumps the PCI Lanes dash I got a 4 x 16 x motherboard because I wanted to utilize the 16x Lanes.
jobin
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-01-21T22:39:57.257Z
2021-01-21T22:39:57.257Z
jobin
<p>The general consensus is like Robert said: <strong>there SHOULDN'T be any difference, but there is!</strong></p>

<p><strong>Having the same problem here!</strong></p>

<p>I'm running Windows 8.1 Pro (64-bit) with five (5) of the new GeForce 750 Ti cards by EVGA (FTW model).</p>

<p>They hash at 320 KH/s when connected to the PCIe 16x slot, but get capped/maxed at 295 KH/s when connected using 1x to 16x riser cables.</p>

<ul>
<li><p>All riser cable molex plugs are connected to power supply.</p></li>
<li><p>All cards have their PCIe 6-pin power plugs connected as well.</p></li>
<li><p>Updated BIOS of cards to take up 65 watts max (or even up to 100 W) to no avail.</p></li>
</ul>

<p>Power supply: 1000 watts (more than enough)</p>

<p>Motherboard: BIOSTAR H81S2 (made for mining) ver. 6 - latest BIOS</p>

<p><strong>UPDATE: I thought the culprit was the motherboard, so I bought the ASRock H81 Pro BTC (made for mining) motherboard.  SAME EXACT STORY!</strong></p>

<p>I was about to try a USB riser cable instead, but I see that the OP (Scott) has the same issue with those as well.</p>

<p>Now I'm leaning towards a driver or OS issue, but I'm quite certain it's because of using the 1x slots, though, AMD cards are hashing at much faster rates!  So that's interesting.  What's going on here?!</p>

<p>I will try running on Linux.</p>

<p>I contacted BIO-STAR for tech support and they'll get back to me.  Their R&amp;D department is looking into this.</p>

<p>I already tried setting the PCI speeds for the slots, in the BIOS, to Gen2, manually (instead of Auto), and that didn't help.  (Because I found someone on the internet with a similar issue and they said this fixed it for them, but it's not exactly this issue they've had).</p>

<p>In the BIOS I tried changing PCI Latency Timer up to 248 PCI Bus Clocks - <strong>didn't help!</strong></p>

<p>In the BIOS I tried changing the Maximum Payload &amp; Maximum Read Request to 4096 bytes - <strong>didn't help!</strong></p>

<p>I've disabled redundant services and components in Windows - <strong>didn't help!</strong></p>

<p>I ran the DPC Latency Checker tool and things seem stable so that's not the issue either.</p>

<p><strong>Interesting to note:</strong></p>

<p>While overclocking above a certain MHz for the core or memory, through the 1x riser, once the hash rate reaches 295 KH/s, it does not go any higher no matter how much you overclock, however, the overclocking utility of choice (EVGA Precision X, ASUS GPU Tweak, MSI Afterburner) will confirm the higher clock rates running on the cards.  If connected through the full PCIe 16x slot, this 295 KH/s limit is non-existent, and the more you overclock past that same amount of MHz as before, the higher the hash rate.</p>

<p>Doesn't matter which version of CUDAminer is being used.</p>

<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> Looks like it's a CUDAminer issue:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.overclock.net/t/1468166/gtx-750-ti-mining/190#post_21890197" rel="nofollow">http://www.overclock.net/t/1468166/gtx-750-ti-mining/190#post_21890197</a></p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Cudaminer apparently has a high PCIe bandwidth utilization...thus when
  going from x16 mode to anything lower, as you get closer to x1 mode
  (risers or not), you're going to see degradation of performance (10-30
  kH/s for 750 Ti in my experience). Cudaminer author is apparently
  going to be working to fix this ASAP since he'll soon be operating a
  750 Ti rig with riser assemblies.</p>
</blockquote>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-03-05T04:08:33.380Z
Excellent debugging, thank you.  It would seem that increasing the PCI latency timer via the BIOS would help, too bad.
Scott
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-03-04T22:07:14.553Z
2014-03-05T00:03:11.460Z
2014-03-05T00:03:11.460Z
Henry
<p>I have a PCI USB riser like this one:
<img src="https://i.sstatic.net/Pg5L0.jpg" alt="PCI x1 USB to PCI x16 riser"></p>

<p>I have 2 identical video cards with one plugged directly into the motherboard and one plugged in via the PCI riser.  I am seeing a hash rate of 290 KH/s on the one directly connected to the motherboard and 210 KH/s on the one connected via the riser.  The riser is connected to the PSU so it is powered.  There is no need to short the PCI slot.  I have tried this riser in both a PCI x1 slot and PCI x16 slot with the same results.  The video cards are both GTX 580.</p>

<p>Could the added latency of going through a USB wire account for this decrease in hash rate?</p>

<p>Using another video card (GTX 750 Ti FTW), I was able to confirm a decrease of about 100 KH/s while connected to the PCI USB riser.  I have tried 2 separate risers with 2 separate video cards and every time a PCI USB riser is involved, my hash rate is lower than when connected directly to the motherboard. The motherboard is a <a href="http://www.gigabyte.us/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3449" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R</a>. The BIOS has been updated and I only see BIOS options to change the PCI Express Frequency and PCI Express Clock Drive.</p>

<p>I am having a hard time finding an answer online and I need experts, please help.  If these USB risers decrease the hashing power then I'm not sure why people want them.  I want them for the added distance I need between my motherboard and GPUS in my setup but perhaps I should alter my setup to allow for the ribbon cable riser version.  I appreciate your recommendations.  Could there be a setting that accounts for this latency and keeps an optimal hashing power?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-27T02:09:48.520Z
Swap the cards, see if the difference is still there. Eliminate variables. The latency in the cable is negligible anyway.
user13413
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-27T16:52:06.740Z
Swapping the cards has no difference.
Scott
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-28T03:16:57.583Z
That doesn't make much sense to me, I can't explain it.
user13413
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-03-16T13:20:52.657Z
What version of USB are the port and the device on? USB is not just a hardware connector specification, it comes with its own layer-1 protocol - a *serial* protocol, by the way - so the rate at which it transmits info. back and forth would definitely be affected depending on the version (I wouldn't use anything but 3)
Joe Pineda
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-03-16T13:30:27.953Z
Another question, at what difficulty are you mining? You could tweak your miner params (increasing diff?) so the cards do as much work as possible on their own without relying too much on the motherboard to provide them data - that way the USB comm. bottleneck would be avoided.
Joe Pineda
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-02-25T09:06:40.687Z
yes. You are transferring data through a device with smaller bandwith. Also today USB3 should be used. A longer thread is here: http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/pci-e-usb-riser/
pebwindkraft
<hashpower><mining-hardware>
Do PCI USB risers lower the hashing rate?
Scott
# Do PCI USB risers lower the hashing rate?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2014-02-26)

I have a PCI USB riser like this one:
![PCI x1 USB to PCI x16 riser](https://i.sstatic.net/Pg5L0.jpg)

I have 2 identical video cards with one plugged directly into the motherboard and one plugged in via the PCI riser. I am seeing a hash rate of 290 KH/s on the one directly connected to the motherboard and 210 KH/s on the one connected via the riser. The riser is connected to the PSU so it is powered. There is no need to short the PCI slot. I have tried this riser in both a PCI x1 slot and PCI x16 slot with the same results. The video cards are both GTX 580.

Could the added latency of going through a USB wire account for this decrease in hash rate?

Using another video card (GTX 750 Ti FTW), I was able to confirm a decrease of about 100 KH/s while connected to the PCI USB riser. I have tried 2 separate risers with 2 separate video cards and every time a PCI USB riser is involved, my hash rate is lower than when connected directly to the motherboard. The motherboard is a [Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R](http://www.gigabyte.us/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3449). The BIOS has been updated and I only see BIOS options to change the PCI Express Frequency and PCI Express Clock Drive.

I am having a hard time finding an answer online and I need experts, please help. If these USB risers decrease the hashing power then I'm not sure why people want them. I want them for the added distance I need between my motherboard and GPUS in my setup but perhaps I should alter my setup to allow for the ribbon cable riser version. I appreciate your recommendations. Could there be a setting that accounts for this latency and keeps an optimal hashing power?

**Tags:** hashpower, mining-hardware

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Swap the cards, see if the difference is still there. Eliminate variables. The latency in the cable is negligible anyway.  
> **username_0**: Swapping the cards has no difference.  
> **username_1**: That doesn't make much sense to me, I can't explain it.  
> **username_2**: What version of USB are the port and the device on? USB is not just a hardware connector specification, it comes with its own layer-1 protocol - a *serial* protocol, by the way - so the rate at which it transmits info. back and forth would definitely be affected depending on the version (I wouldn't use anything but 3)  
> **username_2**: Another question, at what difficulty are you mining? You could tweak your miner params (increasing diff?) so the cards do as much work as possible on their own without relying too much on the motherboard to provide them data - that way the USB comm. bottleneck would be avoided.  
> **username_3**: yes. You are transferring data through a device with smaller bandwith. Also today USB3 should be used. A longer thread is here: http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/pci-e-usb-riser/  

---

## 6 answers

### Answer by username_10 on 2014-03-04. Score: 4 | Accepted answer

The general consensus is like Robert said: **there SHOULDN'T be any difference, but there is!**

**Having the same problem here!**

I'm running Windows 8.1 Pro (64-bit) with five (5) of the new GeForce 750 Ti cards by EVGA (FTW model).

They hash at 320 KH/s when connected to the PCIe 16x slot, but get capped/maxed at 295 KH/s when connected using 1x to 16x riser cables.

* All riser cable molex plugs are connected to power supply.
* All cards have their PCIe 6-pin power plugs connected as well.
* Updated BIOS of cards to take up 65 watts max (or even up to 100 W) to no avail.

Power supply: 1000 watts (more than enough)

Motherboard: BIOSTAR H81S2 (made for mining) ver. 6 - latest BIOS

**UPDATE: I thought the culprit was the motherboard, so I bought the ASRock H81 Pro BTC (made for mining) motherboard. SAME EXACT STORY!**

I was about to try a USB riser cable instead, but I see that the OP (username_0) has the same issue with those as well.

Now I'm leaning towards a driver or OS issue, but I'm quite certain it's because of using the 1x slots, though, AMD cards are hashing at much faster rates! So that's interesting. What's going on here?!

I will try running on Linux.

I contacted BIO-STAR for tech support and they'll get back to me. Their R&D department is looking into this.

I already tried setting the PCI speeds for the slots, in the BIOS, to Gen2, manually (instead of Auto), and that didn't help. (Because I found someone on the internet with a similar issue and they said this fixed it for them, but it's not exactly this issue they've had).

In the BIOS I tried changing PCI Latency Timer up to 248 PCI Bus Clocks - **didn't help!**

In the BIOS I tried changing the Maximum Payload & Maximum Read Request to 4096 bytes - **didn't help!**

I've disabled redundant services and components in Windows - **didn't help!**

I ran the DPC Latency Checker tool and things seem stable so that's not the issue either.

**Interesting to note:**

While overclocking above a certain MHz for the core or memory, through the 1x riser, once the hash rate reaches 295 KH/s, it does not go any higher no matter how much you overclock, however, the overclocking utility of choice (EVGA Precision X, ASUS GPU Tweak, MSI Afterburner) will confirm the higher clock rates running on the cards. If connected through the full PCIe 16x slot, this 295 KH/s limit is non-existent, and the more you overclock past that same amount of MHz as before, the higher the hash rate.

Doesn't matter which version of CUDAminer is being used.

**UPDATE:** Looks like it's a CUDAminer issue:

<http://www.overclock.net/t/1468166/gtx-750-ti-mining/190#post_21890197>

> Cudaminer apparently has a high PCIe bandwidth utilization...thus when
> going from x16 mode to anything lower, as you get closer to x1 mode
> (risers or not), you're going to see degradation of performance (10-30
> kH/s for 750 Ti in my experience). Cudaminer author is apparently
> going to be working to fix this ASAP since he'll soon be operating a
> 750 Ti rig with riser assemblies.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Excellent debugging, thank you.  It would seem that increasing the PCI latency timer via the BIOS would help, too bad.  

---

### Answer by username_4 on 2014-03-16. Score: 2

Nvidia +cuda miner need high PCIe bandwidth while Radeon/AMD+cgminer use very small PCIe bandwidth so using 1x to 16x riser doesn't give any speed reduction

> **Comments:**
> **username_5**: But I am getting lower rate (VEGA 64) when using riser with xmr-stak-amd  

---

### Answer by username_6 on 2018-04-06. Score: 2

It would seem that the GPU cards plugged into a motherboard will transfer on the PCI-e x16 bus, but after plugged into a extension header will only be able use the PCI-e x1 bus. May make a difference.


---

### Answer by username_7 on 2014-02-27. Score: 1

Basically the effects would be negligible, so no. The risers would on a very tiny scale slow down the transmission of block information between the card and the motherboard however the transmission of data is not the bottle-neck when it comes to 'mining' since the actual size of the data files is quite small on the order of Mega bytes in size. The bottle neck in mining speed comes from the cards ability brute force calculate in-order to decrypt the block-chain. This is another reason 16x pcie card slots are not any faster than 1x slots because the rating refers to data transmission and is only really important to video intensive use, like gammers.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Even if the motherboard is first going through a USB controller/cable and then to the video card?  
> **username_7**: I would say that is negligible to, you are correct to say it will slow things down just not anything to worry about.  

---

### Answer by username_8 on 2018-02-24. Score: 1

2/24/18: Having the same issue - I use an ASUS B250 MINING EXPERT with GeIL Pristine 4GB and Intel Core i3-6100T. 2: RAIDMAX RX-1000AP-S 1000W and 1: Corsair RM450

The RM450 runs the motherboard, SSD while the 2: 1000W runs 10: Ver006C Mining Dedicated PCIe Riser Card and the 2: MSI RX480 ARMOR 8GB, 2: XFX RX480 CORE 4GB, 1: MSI RX 570 ARMOR 8GB, 5: MSI RX580 ARMOR 8GB. The RIG is stable no doubt, performs great!

"BUT I know it can be better!"

**The same problem occurs with loss in hash rate about 80-90 H/s per card. All i did was move from the PCIe 16x long slot on the old computer i use for bios modding to the riser cards on my main rig with the ASUS B250 Mining Expert.**

*Example:* After Bios MOD - Mining XLC Leviar Coins, I am currently getting 816 H/s with one RX580. I used this same RX580 in my ECS P67H2-A2 BlackEdition running in the PCIe 16x Long Slot. Started EthOS / SGminer on a thumb drive. **The RX580 solo in the PCIe 16x Long Slot was hashing it out at 905-915 H/s.!**

\*\*\*\*I do not understand the 80-90 h/s difference from the PCIe16x Long slot vs Ver006C Mining PCIe Riser Card\*\* There is definitely a loss of hash rate and it is very annoying. **With 10 Cards- I am losing almost 1000 H/s** Like others say, no mater what setting you change it is throttled like a bottle neck. I hope someone can provide some insight on this issue.\*\*

**Makes you want to run 10 solo rigs to gain back my 1000H/s loss.**

Thanks for reading...

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Do you think there is any difference with the USB 2.0 and the USB 3.0 risers? or does the bottleneck exist elsewhere in the system?  And do you see some of the GPUs hashing significantly higher than others?  Thanks for sharing your experience.  

---

### Answer by username_9 on 2021-01-21. Score: 1

If you can make them fit they have PCI full ribbon cables.depending on the algo/ coin you need lanes. I researched/found this because I was building a folding coin rig which is more computational but it does help with mining.

![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/Veotn.png)

> **Comments:**
> **username_9**: For what it's worth, being able to add extra gpus at 90% efficiency trumps the PCI Lanes dash I got a 4 x 16 x motherboard because I wanted to utilize the 16x Lanes.  

---

