<p>It is important to note that the Elliptic Curve Discrete Logarithm Problem (ECDLP) is slightly different from the normal Discrete Logarithm Problem (DLP).</p>
<p>In DLP, the <code>^</code> operator is actually exponentiation and it is operating on integers so <code>mod p</code> is just the normal modulus. However for ECDLP, <code>^</code> is actually elliptic curve point multiplication. This is different from exponentiation and is a much more involved process. You also cannot <code>mod p</code> with a point because they are not integers. While there is a modulo, it is part of the point multiplication process itself.</p>
<p>The compressedness of the parameters you use does not really matter. In the end, the compression is just the encoding of a point. You need to parse this encoding to determine the X and Y coordinates of the point; both uncompressed and compressed allow you to determine them. The uncompressed just gives you the X and Y coordinates directly while the compressed one gives you the X and whether Y is even or odd so that you can compute the correct Y coordinate. When you do the point multiplication, you are not handling the encoded point as an integer and just multiplying it with <code>x</code>. You are doing elliptic curve point multiplication which is way more complicated.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-07T20:19:41.497Z
But when i tried to use the uncompressed public key to solve for the Elliptic Curve Discrete Logarithm Problem; mod p was actually smaller than the public key. what shoud i do about that?
Dave Kent 
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-08T05:55:33.250Z
@DaveKent How are you trying to solve for ECDLP?
Ava Chow
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-13T00:59:39.620Z
I actually converted the uncompressed public key from hexadecimal to decimal, same as the prime mod P. And as for how I'm going to solve it... It's still in theory;passed some tests though.... So yeah I'm good.
Dave Kent 
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-07T19:19:03.000Z
2021-02-07T19:19:03.000Z
Ava Chow
<p>I tried to observe / implement the discrete logarithm problem but I noticed something about it; but before I get into it let me give some clarification which is open to correction.</p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>a = b^x mod P</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Where as</p>
<p>a = the public key of the address;</p>
<p>b = the generator point of the secp256k1 koblitz curve (this is the
curve in context);</p>
<p>x = the discrete log;</p>
<p>P = the modular integer.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I coupled all parameters below:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>A =
044f355bdcb7cc0af728ef3cceb9615d90684bb5b2ca5f859ab0f0b704075871aa385b6b1b8ead809ca67454d9683fcf2ba03456d6fe2c4abe2b07f0fbdbb2f1c1
(uncompressed public key)<br />
034f355bdcb7cc0af728ef3cceb9615d90684bb5b2ca5f859ab0f0b704075871aa :
(compressed public key)</p>
<p>B = 04 79BE667E F9DCBBAC 55A06295 CE870B07 029BFCDB 2DCE28D9 59F2815B
16F81798 483ADA77 26A3C465 5DA4FBFC 0E1108A8 FD17B448 A6855419
9C47D08F FB10D4B8 (uncompressed generator point)</p>
<p>02 79BE667E F9DCBBAC 55A06295 CE870B07 029BFCDB 2DCE28D9 59F2815B
16F81798 (compress generator point)</p>
<p>X = ?</p>
<p>P = FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFE
FFFFFC2F</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I don't actually know what part of the parameters I should use ( compressed or uncompressed)</p>
<p>N. B :  I tried the uncompressed public key to Mod P but the uncompressed public key exceeded the Mod P in size.</p>
<p>What should I do about this?</p>

<public-key><cryptography><encryption><secp256k1>
Public key Exceeding Mod P? A Clarification Request On The Discrete Logarithm Problem
Dave Kent 
# Public key Exceeding Mod P? A Clarification Request On The Discrete Logarithm Problem

(Asked by: username_0 on 2021-02-07)

I tried to observe / implement the discrete logarithm problem but I noticed something about it; but before I get into it let me give some clarification which is open to correction.

> > a = b^x mod P
>
> Where as
>
> a = the public key of the address;
>
> b = the generator point of the secp256k1 koblitz curve (this is the
> curve in context);
>
> x = the discrete log;
>
> P = the modular integer.

I coupled all parameters below:

> A =
> 044f355bdcb7cc0af728ef3cceb9615d90684bb5b2ca5f859ab0f0b704075871aa385b6b1b8ead809ca67454d9683fcf2ba03456d6fe2c4abe2b07f0fbdbb2f1c1
> (uncompressed public key)  
> 034f355bdcb7cc0af728ef3cceb9615d90684bb5b2ca5f859ab0f0b704075871aa :
> (compressed public key)
>
> B = 04 79BE667E F9DCBBAC 55A06295 CE870B07 029BFCDB 2DCE28D9 59F2815B
> 16F81798 483ADA77 26A3C465 5DA4FBFC 0E1108A8 FD17B448 A6855419
> 9C47D08F FB10D4B8 (uncompressed generator point)
>
> 02 79BE667E F9DCBBAC 55A06295 CE870B07 029BFCDB 2DCE28D9 59F2815B
> 16F81798 (compress generator point)
>
> X = ?
>
> P = FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFE
> FFFFFC2F

I don't actually know what part of the parameters I should use ( compressed or uncompressed)

N. B : I tried the uncompressed public key to Mod P but the uncompressed public key exceeded the Mod P in size.

What should I do about this?

**Tags:** public-key, cryptography, encryption, secp256k1


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2021-02-07. Score: 3 | Accepted answer

It is important to note that the Elliptic Curve Discrete Logarithm Problem (ECDLP) is slightly different from the normal Discrete Logarithm Problem (DLP).

In DLP, the `^` operator is actually exponentiation and it is operating on integers so `mod p` is just the normal modulus. However for ECDLP, `^` is actually elliptic curve point multiplication. This is different from exponentiation and is a much more involved process. You also cannot `mod p` with a point because they are not integers. While there is a modulo, it is part of the point multiplication process itself.

The compressedness of the parameters you use does not really matter. In the end, the compression is just the encoding of a point. You need to parse this encoding to determine the X and Y coordinates of the point; both uncompressed and compressed allow you to determine them. The uncompressed just gives you the X and Y coordinates directly while the compressed one gives you the X and whether Y is even or odd so that you can compute the correct Y coordinate. When you do the point multiplication, you are not handling the encoded point as an integer and just multiplying it with `x`. You are doing elliptic curve point multiplication which is way more complicated.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: But when i tried to use the uncompressed public key to solve for the Elliptic Curve Discrete Logarithm Problem; mod p was actually smaller than the public key. what shoud i do about that?  
> **username_1**: @username_0 How are you trying to solve for ECDLP?  
> **username_0**: I actually converted the uncompressed public key from hexadecimal to decimal, same as the prime mod P. And as for how I'm going to solve it... It's still in theory;passed some tests though.... So yeah I'm good.  

---

