<p>It would appear so, as the actual mining of bitcoin over the years has shifted from home computers, to specific mining equipment, mining has mostly shifted from users, to companies.  While a small user can mine at home at a loss, a company likely cannot (for long), especially considering the scale, as the network grows they need to invest to avoid diminishing returns (home users may just choose not to).</p>

<p>It comes down to economies of scale, unfortunately it will become pointless to mine unless you have near free electricity and cooling.</p>

<p>In future, it's possible that with thin margins, a bad streak of luck is enough to put some mining farms out of business.  And it's truly a case of the only ones benefiting are the ones selling the equipment (much like the gold rush days), it appears to be unfortunate that they are currently also the ones running the mining farms.</p>

<p>Centralization of mining is a major issue (IMO), BitFury stopped selling equipment a long time ago and now mine privately, Bitmain is now the main player, as a private company, we do not know the kinds of deals they can make with other pools or mining companies, we can only assume that a majority of the large ones use their equipment as they are the only people with the size to make significant amounts.  </p>

<p>Canaan and EBang are small players, and I hope for the sake of decentralization they continue to make new equipment that can compete (currently it's not as efficient/fast).</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-06-15T12:56:01.900Z
2017-06-15T12:56:01.900Z
Daniel Morritt
<p>The difficulty is not rising exponentially, but it does keep going up.</p>

<p>Bitcoin miners have definitely gone from a large group of small miners to a small group of big miners.</p>

<p>In 2010 GPU (graphics card) mining made it hard to mine on CPUs. Sometime 2011 CPU mining became pointless. This meant office PCs could no longer take part in mining. Intel graphics (built into Intel CPUs) and Nvidia were both pretty bad at it. So it really meant mining was now only for gaming PCs with AMD graphics.</p>

<p>In 2013 Bitcoin ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit) miners appeared. Sure, some mined on FPGAs before this, but FPGAs didn't make that great an impact before ASICs arrived and killed off both GPU and FPGA mining. Now bitcoin mining was only for people who bought specialized bitcoin mining hardware.</p>

<p>In 2009 anyone could mine 50-100 bitcoins per day on an old laptop. After the transition to ASICs in 2013 you couldn't mine without specialized hardware.</p>

<p>This has greatly reduced the number of people who are able to mine.</p>

<p>Competition is also getting very fierce and margins are slim.</p>

<p>Some miners design their own ASIC chips and build their own miners with these chips. If you buy your miners from them, how can you compete on acquisition cost of miners?</p>

<p>Some miners have special deals with their power company. Can you get electricity cheap enough to compete?</p>

<p>Some say Bitmain uses Asicboost, which gives them a huge advantage. The only way to compete with Asicboost is to use Asicboost. Do you have a setup capable of using it? Will you risk a lawsuit? Yes, strangely someone has a patent pending on this simple software optimization.</p>

<p>Some mining operations are in very cold places like Iceland. Cooling is probably more expensive for you than for them.</p>

<p>The fiercer the competition, the fewer are able to stay in the game.</p>

<p>I wouldn't call this a bottleneck. But it is a security risk. With the majority of hashrate in China, the Chinese government can 51% attack bitcoin. Bitcoin scalability may also have been achieved more easily without huge mining entities that can veto every proposal to improve bitcoin.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-06-14T17:24:11.217Z
2017-06-14T17:24:11.217Z
Dr.Haribo
<p>From what I am learning about bitcoin, the mining process is becoming exponentially difficult and hence exponentially more expensive (or at least more expensive), as people need more physical resources. As a result, there is an aggregation of miners (i.e. small players merge or get acquired by big ones or just go bankrupt).
Will this result in a decreased number of miners and an increased miner size, which can be a potential bottleneck for the currency?</p>

<p>P.S. A bottleneck, as a lower number of miners increases the risk of collusion and jeopardizes the security of the currency?</p>

<mining-pools><mining-profitability><decentralization>
Are the bitcoin miners decreasing in quantity and increasing in size?
Newskooler
# Are the bitcoin miners decreasing in quantity and increasing in size?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-06-10)

From what I am learning about bitcoin, the mining process is becoming exponentially difficult and hence exponentially more expensive (or at least more expensive), as people need more physical resources. As a result, there is an aggregation of miners (i.e. small players merge or get acquired by big ones or just go bankrupt).
Will this result in a decreased number of miners and an increased miner size, which can be a potential bottleneck for the currency?

P.S. A bottleneck, as a lower number of miners increases the risk of collusion and jeopardizes the security of the currency?

**Tags:** mining-pools, mining-profitability, decentralization


---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2017-06-14. Score: 3 | Accepted answer

The difficulty is not rising exponentially, but it does keep going up.

Bitcoin miners have definitely gone from a large group of small miners to a small group of big miners.

In 2010 GPU (graphics card) mining made it hard to mine on CPUs. Sometime 2011 CPU mining became pointless. This meant office PCs could no longer take part in mining. Intel graphics (built into Intel CPUs) and Nvidia were both pretty bad at it. So it really meant mining was now only for gaming PCs with AMD graphics.

In 2013 Bitcoin ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit) miners appeared. Sure, some mined on FPGAs before this, but FPGAs didn't make that great an impact before ASICs arrived and killed off both GPU and FPGA mining. Now bitcoin mining was only for people who bought specialized bitcoin mining hardware.

In 2009 anyone could mine 50-100 bitcoins per day on an old laptop. After the transition to ASICs in 2013 you couldn't mine without specialized hardware.

This has greatly reduced the number of people who are able to mine.

Competition is also getting very fierce and margins are slim.

Some miners design their own ASIC chips and build their own miners with these chips. If you buy your miners from them, how can you compete on acquisition cost of miners?

Some miners have special deals with their power company. Can you get electricity cheap enough to compete?

Some say Bitmain uses Asicboost, which gives them a huge advantage. The only way to compete with Asicboost is to use Asicboost. Do you have a setup capable of using it? Will you risk a lawsuit? Yes, strangely someone has a patent pending on this simple software optimization.

Some mining operations are in very cold places like Iceland. Cooling is probably more expensive for you than for them.

The fiercer the competition, the fewer are able to stay in the game.

I wouldn't call this a bottleneck. But it is a security risk. With the majority of hashrate in China, the Chinese government can 51% attack bitcoin. Bitcoin scalability may also have been achieved more easily without huge mining entities that can veto every proposal to improve bitcoin.


---

### Answer by username_1 on 2017-06-15. Score: 0

It would appear so, as the actual mining of bitcoin over the years has shifted from home computers, to specific mining equipment, mining has mostly shifted from users, to companies. While a small user can mine at home at a loss, a company likely cannot (for long), especially considering the scale, as the network grows they need to invest to avoid diminishing returns (home users may just choose not to).

It comes down to economies of scale, unfortunately it will become pointless to mine unless you have near free electricity and cooling.

In future, it's possible that with thin margins, a bad streak of luck is enough to put some mining farms out of business. And it's truly a case of the only ones benefiting are the ones selling the equipment (much like the gold rush days), it appears to be unfortunate that they are currently also the ones running the mining farms.

Centralization of mining is a major issue (IMO), BitFury stopped selling equipment a long time ago and now mine privately, Bitmain is now the main player, as a private company, we do not know the kinds of deals they can make with other pools or mining companies, we can only assume that a majority of the large ones use their equipment as they are the only people with the size to make significant amounts.

Canaan and EBang are small players, and I hope for the sake of decentralization they continue to make new equipment that can compete (currently it's not as efficient/fast).


---

