Don't just defend aid – make it just
Development (Aid)
Britain's aid budget cut is the act of a callous government. But we must re-think aid if we're to turn the tide, writes Nick Dearden.
UK Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak jettisoned the UK's pledge
to retain the UK's 0.7 per cent foreign aid commitment this week.
Credit: Andrew Parsons
When David Cameron set out to de-toxify the 'nasty party', as the Conservatives were often labelled by opponents in the 1990s, the pledge to maintain aid spending was top of his list. Many in his party bristled with anger about the policy, egged-on by right-wing tabloids, who have waged a war on the aid budget ever since.
This week, Rishi Sunak jettisoned the pledge to retain the 0.7 per cent commitment and slashed the aid budget. In the middle of a pandemic, which will see extreme poverty balloon and inequality further sky rocket next year, to cut the one budget which could potentially ameliorate this a little, is beyond callous. The nasty party is well and truly back.
But the cuts are only part of the story. Also this week, Dominic Raab announced a new strategy detailing how the remaining cash will be spent. Underlying some fine words about climate change, health and education, this strategy ties aid spending more centrally to British interests around the world; poverty is barely mentioned. Raab says in future 'we will focus only on countries where the UK's development, security and economic interests align' building 'trading and investment' links, and 'helping' countries to 'create better investment environments' (read: strip away any obstacles to our businesses being able to make money from their country).
This takes us back to the bad old days before the Department for International Development was established, when development funds were spent on dubious projects more about boosting British exports than fighting poverty. My organization took the government to court in the 1990s, when they used aid to fund a dam in Malaysia, atrocious value for money in itself, on the basis that Malaysia purchase British arms in return.
The nasty party is well and truly back. But the cuts are only part of the story
This undermines the whole purpose of aid, which at its best should be a contribution – albeit a small one – to a global redistribution of wealth. In turn, this undermines public belief in aid, which is seen as a slush fund that benefits the richest, not the poorest. How else can Nigel Farage claim the aid is some sort of elite conspiracy to rip off ordinary people in Britain and get a serious hearing?
In coming months, we will see a ratcheting-up of atrocious aid spending. Those who support the aid budget should not shy away from criticizing this spending in the hope the public won't notice. There are a few trends in particular we need to watch out for.
First, aid will increasingly be used to help expand the role of the City of London post-Brexit, as it tries to transition from the premier European financial hub to a financial hub for developing countries; this is well underway. Priti Patel, as development secretary, opened the London Stock Exchange one morning in March 2017 hailing a new a partnership with the financial sector to 'generate much needed business investment in developing countries'.
Now, investment can indeed be useful, if governments on the receiving end can regulate, tax and control it. The City of London, however, is known worldwide for its low regulation, low tax status. The last thing impoverished countries need is more unregulated finance, sucking wealth out of their countries.
Second, the British government has repeatedly suggested aid should be used to help facilitate trade deals with developing countries. There is a pot of money set aside for this very goal, which helps countries 'promote economic reforms' and 'remove barriers to trade'. Given that these reforms are usually about sweeping away regulations and protections which get in the way of investor profits, this is yet another fund that seems more likely to increase, rather than decrease poverty and inequality.
Third, successive governments have used development funds to aid business, rather than the poorest. The idea being that public money can be used to leverage private investment into developing countries. The reality is that all too often aid money is used simply to support privatization schemes, and open up new markets for likes of Nestle, Mars, Syngenta and Unilever across Africa. This simply confuses development with capitalism.
In coming months, we will see a ratcheting-up of atrocious aid spending. Those who support the aid budget should not shy away from criticizing this spending in the hope the public won't notice
Fighting for an aid budget to be spent on more of the above is counter-productive. As important as fighting to restore the aid budget is, it will only achieve what it should – and indeed will only regain the support of ordinary people in Britain – if it is re-envisioned.
Aid should not be about building Britain's power, soft or otherwise. We're one of the wealthiest countries in the world, even though many don't feel it. Aid should help redistribute power and wealth so everyone in the world can enjoy education, healthcare and social projection as a right. Neither is aid a matter of charity, any more than it is charity that we should pay our taxes to provide council housing and social protection, regardless of whether we ourselves use those things or not. To this end, the term aid is deeply unhelpful and should be changed.
Aid should help redistribute power and wealth so everyone in the world can enjoy education, healthcare and social projection as a right
What's more, aid can only ever be a small part of the solution. As things stand, even well-spent aid is less about redistribution than inadequate compensation for the damage Britain does around the world. The aid budget pales in comparison with the amount our financial system drains from Africa, Asia and Latin America. Aid doesn't even begin to make up for the damage Britain does.
The answer is not to endlessly increase aid, but to stop doing the damage – to rein in our corporations and our financial sector, to crack down on the network of tax havens (with the City of London at its centre), to stop forcing dodgy trade deals on countries and to prevent our banks bleeding countries dry by irresponsible lending.
Many of us are doubtless horrified by the opinion poll showing significant support for the cut in aid spending. But we shouldn't be surprised. The aid budget has been mercilessly attacked by the rightwing tabloids, used to fund ideologically driven projects by government ministers, and unhelpfully framed as a form of charity even by many well-intentioned champions. We're now at a crossroads. Either we accept the nasty party has finally got its way, or we remember what 'aid' was supposed to be about – and build the sort of movement which can win it.
Nick Dearden
Nick Dearden is the director of Global Justice Now (formerly World Development Movement) and former director of Jubilee Debt Campaign.
More about Nick Dearden
The bleak future of British foreign aid
The government's 'international development' strategy is a red herring for dubious private financing, argues Nick Dearden
The UK must stop aid to failing private schools
How did we get to the point where two African countries are trying to shut down our aid funded schools? Nick Dearden asks.
A photographic account of changes over the years in: housing; water; education; health; sanitation; food and farming;...
Switched on
Technology, whether low or high, needs to be appropriate and within reach to make a difference.
Male baldness v malaria?
Simon Trace on the skewed priorities of medical research.
'Because the river told me'
Peasant farmers resisting the violence of agribusiness. By Nils McCune.
Mind the technology gap - the facts
Technology can be a big enabler – yet the difference in terms of what's available to rich and poor is vast.
Technology as if people mattered*
The world's poor are still losing out. They need a better deal, argues Dinyar Godrej.
Why don't they go and look?
Forget number-crunching; development workers need to get out into the field to understand poverty, writes Maggie Black.
G7's 'New Alliance' deal is failing farmers in Africa
Aisha Dodwell argues that such schemes only line transnationals' pockets.
The UN sustainable development goals miss the point
It's all about power, argues Nick Dearden.
Calling time on the MDGs
No development process succeeds without the participation of those it targets, argues Maggie Black.
The Western way isn't always the best way
Development – when forced onto poor countries – is a dangerous concept, argues Amit Singh.
British aid and the return of the trickle-down myth
Campaigners' blind defence of the government's development strategy is making things worse, says Nick Dearden.
Radical ideas and true solidarity are essential for today's internationalism
Amy Hall sums up a night of discussion and reflection on the marking of New Internationalist's 40th birthday.
International aid agencies must work in partnership with local organizations
Local action is more effective than an uncoordinated international response to disasters, says Alexander Carnwath.
Internationalism is about justice – and the World Cup too
The international development agenda needs to be reclaimed as a struggle for global justice argues Jean Grugel.
NGOs must give up power
Aid organizations need to relinquish the clout that comes with money and bureaucracy, argues Oxfam's Ben Phillips.
The wrong kind of solidarity
If you erase power and class, you are left with a cosmopolitan elite lecturing on 'global society' to people suffering poverty at...
As the cuts bite, why bother with the global South?
Jonathan Glennie opens our Internationalists series, calling on rich nations to reject nagging stinginess and embrace radical...
VIDEO: the power of participation
Chris Lunch believes we are only just scratching the surface of video technology's potential.
What will happen when the MDGs expire?
Dan Smith gets to grips with the UN High Level Panel's report on international development post-2015, and argues that it needs to...
G8 hunger summit provokes protest and praise
Amy Hall joins the London climax of the IF campaign and finds herself musing the age old question – can you change the system...
Haiti's poor majority pushed to the margins
While commercial interests look to 'seize opportunity' in the country, Sokari Ekine has seen an increase in the level of poverty.
Interactive timeline: 40 years of New Internationalist
Four decades of independent journalism and the social and environmental movements which inspired it.
A measure of progress
The founding editor of the New Internationalist, Peter Adamson, looks at how the world has changed since the magazine started –...
World Progress 1970-2010 - The Facts
Steps forward, steps back - what effect have 40 years of development had?
PODCAST: Chris Brazier on 40 years of New Internationalist
The magazine's longest serving co-editor discusses world progress and whether the concepts of development and economic growth are...
Syrian diaspora leads aid effort
Saleyha Ahsan on the grassroots NGOs providing humanitarian care in Syria, despite lack of support from major development...
From war to democracy: reframing Sierra Leone
As he remembers the 1999 Freetown massacre, Seray Bangura looks to a bright future for the country formally known as 'war torn.'
PODCAST: Hazel Healy and Charlie Harvey on digital freedom
Computers are a growing part of our lives but do they give us more freedom or reduce our civil liberties?
The Philippines' development should be towards equality
Jessica Cantos on the expiration of the Millennium Development Goals and the need to put people before profit.
How hacktivism fights corruption
Computer programmers and campaigners have teamed up to 'hack' for justice, reports Transparency International's Milena Marin.
Is it curtains for Fair Trade?
With corporates swarming all over the trade justice brand, David Ransom says Fair Trade must stick to its founding ideals or...
Remembering the humanitarians
Ashley Jackson explains how the agendas of Western governments have turned relief work into a lethal occupation.
Hunger and the 0.7% aid debate
Poor people need aid but it needs to be targeted and the structures that perpetuate global inequality must also be tackled, says...
Should India still receive foreign aid?
NGO director Jamal Kidwai and activist and writer Praful Bidwai go head-to-head - read their arguments and join the debate.
The flip side to Bill Gates' charity billions
Microsoft's former CEO has made massive donations to global health programmes but an investigation by Andrew Bowman reveals some...
Letter from Botswana: ET is not an alien
New columnist Lauri Kubuitsile introduces dry and dusty Mahalapye- a town that has stolen her heart.
Haiti two years on: beyond relief, beyond belief
Haiti is not just recovering from the earthquake but from the political and economic interventions of recent decades, asPhillip...