Within a few centuries mankind has swung out of the clutches of a tyrannical church into the clutches of a tyrannical "settled" science. We're being conditioned to accept what the ruling elite tells us is settled, sometimes in a manner which smacks of Hegelian/ Marxist dialectics.
The Hegelian dialectic has been applied and defined most simply by David Icke as one of "Problem – Reaction – Solution".
1. Government creates or exploits a problem blaming it on others.
2. The people react by asking the government for help, willing to give up their rights.
3. The government offers the solution that was planned long before the crisis.
CLIMATE CHANGE: WE'RE ALL DOOMED, UNLESS….
With record cold temperatures being blamed by the government on global warming, I have to wonder if the next pronouncement will be that "two and two make five".
IS IT REALLY SETTLED SCIENCE?
That doesn't sound very scientific to me, and neither does it sound like evidence. In fact, his own words are "no evidence".
"The purpose of the Petition Project is to demonstrate that the claim of "settled science" and an overwhelming "consensus" in favor of the hypothesis of human-caused global warming and consequent climatological damage is wrong. No such consensus or settled science exists. As indicated by the petition text and signatory list, a very large number of American scientists reject this hypothesis.
"Publicists at the United Nations, Mr. Al Gore, and their supporters frequently claim that only a few "skeptics" remain – skeptics who are still unconvinced about the existence of a catastrophic human-caused global warming emergency.
"These scientists are instead convinced that the human-caused global warming hypothesis is without scientific validity and that government action on the basis of this hypothesis would unnecessarily and counterproductively damage both human prosperity and the natural environment of the Earth".
"We simply don't have time to let a few loud interest groups hijack the climate conversation".
Bill Nye "the Science Guy," …has lately become a secular evangelist, preaching to parents about the dangers of allowing their children to be sucked into believing that someone bigger than man created the earth.
Well, I for one am very thankful for those storks, and proud to be a member of the flat-earth society!
"It is absolutely safe to say that if you meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid or insane (or wicked, but I'd rather not consider that)".
(From Richard Dawkins' Review of "Blueprints: Solving the Mystery of Evolution").
Climate change proponents, particularly those in high office, publicly put most of the blame for climate change onto big business, particularly the oil companies. This ensures a large amount of support from people who think that if corporations and big business are cut down to size we'll all be much better off. Those same politicians neglect to tell us that we will be the ones paying the price in increased food and fuel prices, who will be subject to more controls and surveillance and penalties, and who will be manipulated by more laws, rules and regulations.
The sovereignty of nations is being intentionally subordinated to more control by international bodies under the UN umbrella, so that people in other parts of the world will dictate how you are to live and how much tax money you will part with. We're being shuffled towards "global governance" (aka global government) by means of the "problem-reaction-solution" method, in which we are told we are unavoidably independent, if we do not want to succumb to some disaster or other.
But why would some scientists say that they are convinced of man-made global climate change? At least one answer to that is that if they do not, they will be lose their job or will fail to get the grants they need to stay in business. Non-governmental agencies also receive grants and funding for towing the correct line, and therefore members don't have to go out and find a proper job like the rest of us do. Some environmentalists believe that mankind is nothing more than a cancer on the earth, or at best an animal no more valuable that a worm or a fish. They wish to see humans diminished in power and presence on the earth.
There has been no global warming for over seventeen years (2), hence the need for proponents to change the working term to "climate change". Even if there had been, it would not prove that human activity is the cause. Climate change has been going on since the beginning of the world, but now it's going to be used as an excuse to get more taxes out of us and to put more controls on us. Every time there's a tornado or a hot day or a few inches of snow we'll be told it's due to the destructive activities and proclivities of human nature.
"An ancient forest has thawed from under a melting glacier in Alaska and is now exposed to the world for the first time in more than 1,000 years." (6).