Compensation events are referred to in NEC3, and are similar to relevant events and relevant matters referred to in other forms of contract such as JCT contracts.
If events occur during the course of the works that cause the completion of the works to be delayed then these may be compensation events. Compensation events will normally result in additional payment being made to the contractor and may result in adjustment of the completion date or key dates.
The contract limits compensation events to those, and only those, identified in the contract. If an event is not identified in the contract as being a compensation event then no claim should be submitted whether or not there has been a delay. The contract prevents the parties circumventing the contract by making a claim for damages at common law.
Events that normally constitute compensation events are set out in clause 60.1. There is also provision for the parties to add additional compensation events, but great care must be taken here as to how such events are defined.
Very broadly, compensation events tend to be those events that impact on the completion date, but are not the contractor's fault. This might include events that are caused by the client, or neutral events such as exceptionally adverse weather. However, NEC3 does not treat compensation events as an allocation of blame, but rather an allocation of risk. Any risk that is not specifically identified as being attributed to the client is borne by the contractor.
Instructions to change the service (unless this results from accepting a defect, or from a change requested by the contractor).
Failure of the client to provide equipment, plant or materials.
An instruction to halt, or delay the works.
Conditions that could not reasonably have been foreseen.
Exceptionally adverse weather (beyond one in ten year frequency).
Force majeure (such as an epidemic or an 'act of God').
If an event occurs that the contractor considers to be a compensation event, they must notify the project manager within 8 weeks of becoming aware of the event (unless the project manager should have given notification). This is a condition precedent to making a claim, and compensation events cannot be considered if the 8 week deadline is missed. However the phrase 'becoming aware of' leaves some scope for dispute.
The project manager then has one week to agree whether they consider that it is a compensation event. The contractor then has up to three weeks to provide quotation, and the project manager a further two weeks to respond. When agreement has been reached, any changes to the contract are implemented.
The contract also makes provision for early warning procedures. Both parties must give early warning of anything that may delay the works, or increase costs. They should then hold an early warning meeting to discuss how to avoid or mitigate impacts on the project. If the contractor fails to give early warning of a possible delay to the works, or increase in costs, they will only be compensated for effects that would have remained anyway even if they had given early warning.
If the contractor fails to give warning of an event that may give rise to a possible delay to the works, or increase in costs, within 8 weeks of becoming aware of the event, they will not be entitled to a change in price, completion date or key date, unless the project manager should have notified the event to the contractor but did not.
How to prepare a claim for an extension of time.
ICI v Merit Merrell Technology.