They all different, but I'm fine with how they read the game and comment.
PS: I don't really put here new commentators and some NKL commentators because it's just would be not fair, I went for well known fellows.
I also enjoyed Petrauskas voice and articulation and emotions generally, but I don't really find his game reading spot on and surely not deep. I still had some problems with his attitudes in "Ginčas" show last season or so, to me he still has very limited and artificial take on basketball I'm guessing it comes from the fact he does many other stuff, he's not 100% into basketball or sports, far from that.
I didn't hear how Rokas Grajauskas comments NBA game, but he's the best NBA analyst in Lithuania. He really does it well and he's all into NBA media and really understands.
It's possible not to like Ceponis, but how it's possible not to consider him a commentator? Why he's isn't a commentator and someone else is? For example some Kunigelis whose diction, emotions, game reading and understunding are IMO in a poor level, in a way worse than Ceponis's. And even if i don't like Kungelis, i can't say he's not a commentator. It would be a wrong statement just like regarding Ceponis.
Personally i don't have any problems listening to Lithuanian commentators. I think they are very decent. As for mentioned Kunigelis it's natural not to like everyone.