Integral Leadership Review
About ILR
Friends of ILR
Integral Leadership Council
4/22 – Emotional Maturity with Diane Musho Hamilton
Fresh Perspective / April-June 2017
Lauren Tenney
Diane Musho Hamilton
In this interview with Diane Musho Hamilton, we explore the territory of emotional maturity, and how it underpins and amplifies our efficacy and contribution to the world. Diane Musho Hamilton is the author of The Zen of You and Me, just released from Shambhala Publications, and is the co-founder and lead trainer of Integral Facilitator programs. Diane's newest online course with Ten Directions, Willing to Feel: Essential Skills for Emotional Maturity, begins on April 25th. Diane was interviewed for this piece by Lauren Tenney on April 14th, 2017.
LT: What is Emotional Maturity, and how do we develop it?
DH: I would say that Emotional Maturity is a willingness to become more intimate with what we feel. And to do that, there are several phases. First, there needs to be a recognition of including emotions as a valuable part of our life experience. We can acknowledge that emotions are a form of energy and a source of intelligence. When we are in the midst of a strong emotional state, we can be aware of the enlivened quality of emotion, and also take note of the information we are receiving about the situation. So if we are mad about something, chances are, something unfair is going on. If we are feeling jealous, there may be probably a threat to the security of your relationship or to our self image.
Because emotions are so immediately felt by others, another value is they are a very effective form of communication. For example, in Martin Luther King's, I Have a Dream speech, he includes vehemence and righteous indignation, and he exalts us towards a vision, extolling us to become greater and more. The communication is far more effective because we are moved listening to him. Emotional states communicate; they convey meaning; they are intelligent, and they bond us to each other. As I say in my book, would you want to watch a movie that didn't move you?
Working with our emotional states is also the doorway to becoming a very heart-felt and compassionate human being. Feeling is the doorway to learn how to include our pain and broken-heartedness, and through this, we develop more empathy and compassion.
So emotional maturity begins by recognizing the value of emotional and feeling states, and being willing to feel them. The challenge for many of us is to simply give ourselves permission to feel – without distracting ourselves, or dulling them down, or projecting them out. That is where the heart of the practice is for many of us – being willing to feel fully. On the other hand, we can have a very primitive relationship to our emotions which means that we're completely subject to them. When they arise, we get completely lost in them. We're not able to take a perspective on them, but drown in feeling and regard them as the whole truth. And then we can also become habitually attached to our emotions, and display a tendency to cling to them.
Many people experience one or more of these habits in relating with emotion and feeling. So first we must learn to feel the emotion, noticing the bodily sensations, the waves of intensity, and the attendant thoughts in the mind. Once we can feel fully, then we can differentiate from them, and see how they are fleeting, they pass quickly, and they are not "me." When we can feel, differentiate from the feeling, then we are positioned to include our emotional states in a much fuller way because we are not consumed by them.
Including emotions when they are free of habitual fixation, brings freshness, meaning, depth, and connection to our relationships. And as I said before, there is an intelligence to our experience that we can draw on and include, without letting the emotion dominate our perspective. So it's really about including and releasing emotions efficiently. And it takes attention and practice, including modelling on people who are balanced in including emotion.
LT: What does it look like in practice when we're working with our emotions in this way?
DH: We can begin by asking, what exactly is the experience? If I'm feeling afraid, am I feeling it in my solar plexus? Is my heart palpitating? Can I feel heat in my throat? If I'm feeling angry, where in the body do I register anger? Do I notice my shoulders are hunched or my fists are clenched? Is there heat in my forehead? Is there tension in my jaw and my neck? To actually experience feeling is absolutely fundamental to emotional maturity.
Once you're willing to feel, the next step is to notice how fleeting the emotions are. Notice how the feelings are intense and at the same time, they very fleeting. Emotions are both full of embodied sensation, but they are empty of ultimate truth and fixed substance. Otherwise you wouldn't be able to let go of them. And learning how to let go of them is equally as important as including them. We have to get over the experience that when we are immersed in an emotion, it is going to last forever, even though it often feels like it will. For example, if we are grieving, we feel like it is we are going to grieve forever or be overwhelmed by sorrow for the rest of our lives. There's a way that states take over our sense of time. But as we allow ourselves to inhabit feeling states, we learn at the same time to see how they pass. As by seeing how quickly they shift, our confidence in the transitory nature of them also increases.
Once we can feel the fullness and the emptiness around the feeling, naming it cognitively actually helps to experience an emotion more clearly. We have a very limited vocabulary for naming emotion. One of the simple practices we can do is go online and pull up lists of names of emotions, and expand our vocabulary so that we are able to say something more than "I'm mad, glad, or sad."
Finally, it is important to develop the ability to receive the message in the emotion, clarify its meaning, and integrate it without the defensiveness and egoic attachment. We want to feel the fullness and the emptiness at the same time, to receive the meaningfulness, receive the energy, and then include them in our communications. But the emphasis should be on self-responsibility for our emotions. For example, "I'm angry because I want your attention", as opposed to "I'm angry because you don't pay attention to me." The more we are able to do this, the more people around us have permission to do it as well. And then we all get better at it.
LT: What is the impact when, as you say, we "all get better" at this?
DH: We create cultures where there is room for people's feeling states. Someone starts to cry in a meeting because they've experienced a loss, and everybody doesn't panic. Someone feels confused momentarily — totally fine. Confusion has it's own intelligence, and we all have it sometimes. So, there's a freedom and flexibility that comes about. We can be more at ease with a greater array of experiences, and access the intelligence and information that is available in those experiences.
LT: I could imagine someone interpreting the idea that emotion contains intelligence to mean that their feeling state IS a sufficient data point for confirming reality. But that's a big leap to make, and having a feeling isn't necessarily evidence that what we perceive has actually occurred. Could you elaborate on that?
DH: Well, I think what you just said is totally the case. When it's our felt experience, it needs to be owned in the first person. Even saying "I'm having the experience that this is massively unfair" is very different from saying "This is unfair." Whether it actually is from a third person perspective is a different issue, but the experience I'm having right now is that it feels unfair. This is why our ability to own our subjectivity rather than projecting it out is so important. We know from Integral theory that there are different truth verifications. An emotion is not a particularly strong truth verification. It is part of a first person experience and informs our perspective, so there is some kind of truth in it. If we're all feeling a certain way, there is a second person truth in it. But I would agree with you that it's not a very complete source of truth. Sometimes if we've done psychotherapy and we are trying to work with our emotions, we almost create a shrine to our feeling states as though feelings states are truth. Feeling states are simply one form of knowing, and they tend to be very transitory and pass very quickly. So we have to understand the relative nature of emotion. And certainly, emotion isn't going to point us to absolute truths. Because emotions are passing–not to be confused with ever-present awareness.
LT: Is our emotional fluency or willingness to feel influenced by life experiences or temperament?
DH: We all tend to be habituated to certain emotions, depending on what was expressed in our families and the culture of our upbringing. There's a palette of emotions that we are used to engaging based on our conditioning that differs from family to family, and culture to culture. Different cultures have a different palette of emotions. I haven't thought about typology in this regard with a whole lot of depth, but for instance, the Enneagram system could be a lens through which to explore this question. Let's imagine a way that a 4 enneatype will experience an emotion like loneliness, for instance. The interpretative frame on that loneliness may be that "I'm special and no one understands me." Where the interpretive frame of the 2 might be "I've given so much and now no one takes care of me." And then the interpretive frame for a 1 for the same experience of loneliness might be something like "Of course I'm alone, because the world is so fundamentally imperfect, that there's no way to stay related." So I think the interpretive frame is likely to be influenced by typology.
In addition, perhaps certain emotions are more available to certain types. Let's say if you're an enneatype '3', you might be subject to embarrassment or humiliation maybe more than an '8' would. Perhaps an '8' is probably prone to feeling more lust and raw appetite than a '5' would. A '5' is going to want to experience a kind of holding onto or withholding, because that's how '5's are structured. So I think within a typology, we're prone to experiencing different sets of emotions based on that typology.
LT: Speaking to an Integral audience, how do you situate the importance of focusing on developing one's skills around emotional fluency, and maturity?
DH: From an integral practice perspective, developing the emotional line and wanting to become more fluid and free with the expression of emotion has to be an ongoing practice.
Like all Integral endeavours, people tend to be more developed in the cognitive line. But there are a goodly amount of people who have done a lot of psychotherapeutic work; they've done a lot of we-space work, and they seem to be willing to engage and include emotion in the way that some people don't. Yet like anyone, we can have trouble when we're overly stressed or overly distressed. Or if we somehow feel that the emotion is going to create a vulnerability, we may naturally refuse to feel it. Sometimes feeling emotion implies complexity because it's very rare to have a singular emotion. We often experience fear and anger together or hurt and anger, we may experience anger as a part of grief.
So as integralists we must acknowledge our interiors, and understand that our connection with each other demands mature emotional expression. Even if we're not demonstrably skilled in emotional territory, we can be open to it, and we can become more confident and capable in how we navigate it. The idea that we're constantly practicing with this dimension of who we are is very much an Integral idea.
LT: As we work with our emotions and become more willing to feel, and to let go, do things get easier? Does the intensity of challenging emotions wane?
DH: It's difficult to include 'hard', and, what we might call 'negative', emotional states. Some people have an idea that they should just discipline themselves to only feel positive things. My response to that is if you simply want to be a performance robot, then go ahead, but if you want to be a heart-centered human being, then you have to allow for the pain, open your heart, and be willing to feel the complexity of emotion as it arises. As you become more adept, you're able to feel more, and in turn, you allow the people around you feel you more. And in that learning to include emotion, you will experience a growing confidence and better communication. Other people receive from you the message that they can also be more free, and they can grow in their emotional maturity. And this permission will uplift all of us.
Learn more about Diane's upcoming online training, Willing to Feel: Essential Skills for Emotional Maturity, which begins on April 25th.
Lauren Tenney is a Senior Consultant, Director of New Program Development and Editor in Chief at Ten Directions. She is a Certified Presence Based Coach and a Certified Integral Facilitator, and a member of the training team for Integral Facilitator programs. For the past ten years she has been immersed in the fields of human development, transformative learning, integrative systems, strategic communications and small business development. Lauren is experienced with many of today's most innovative tools for transformation and collaboration, including: Immunity to Change, Sociocracy, Holacracy, The Natural Change Process, Evolving Worldviews, Way of Council, Cynefin Framework, Permaculture Design, Integral Theory, and Presence Based Coaching. As a facilitator and coach, Lauren supports individuals, teams and small organizations who are confronting challenges at the intersection of interpersonal dynamics, vision & mission, and process design.
Diane Musho Hamilton is a uniquely gifted, playful, and awake group facilitator, consultant and teacher of Integral Spirituality and Zen. She is a lineage holder in the Soto Zen tradition, and has collaborated with the Integral Institute and Ken Wilber since 2004, developing the Integral Life Practice seminars and the Integral Spiritual Experience global events. Diane is the co-founder and lead trainer of Integral Facilitator programs.
Diane is well known as an innovator in facilitating group dialogues, especially conversations about culture, religion, race and gender relations. She was the first Director of the Office of Alternative Dispute Resolution for the Utah Judiciary, where she established mediation programs throughout the court system. She is the recipient of several prestigious awards for her work in this area, including the Peter W. Billings Award and the UCCR Peacekeeper Award.
She has studied and practiced Buddhadharma for over 25 years, beginning at Naropa Institute in 1984 with the teachings of Choygam Trungpa Rinpoche. She was ordained as a Zen priest in 2003 and received dharma transmission from her teacher, Genpo Roshi, in 2006. She is a facilitator of Big Mind Big Heart, a process developed by Roshi to bring the insights of Zen to Western audiences.
With her husband, Zen teacher and lawyer Michael Mugaku Zimmerman, she established Two Arrows Zen, a center for the study and practice of Zen. They maintain two facilities – an urban center in downtown Salt Lake City, and a rural retreat center in the red rocks of Southern Utah where traditional Zen meditation is joined with nature-based practices and shamanic disciplines.
With extraordinary depth and insight, Diane encourages us to consciously evolve beyond old and limited ideas of who we are so that we might discover our own unique expression of wisdom and of compassion in this time. She is the author of Everything is Workable, published by Shambhala Press, and a contributor to Harvard Business Review. Her newest book The Zen of You and Me, also by Shambhala Press, was released in March 2017.
← 4/22 – Don't make vertical growth your biggest completion project 4/22 – Jeannie Carlisle with Marilyn Hamilton: Integral City, Inquiry & Action →
Pierre GOIRAND on 12/21 – The Unintentional Bully: An Autoethnographic Reflection on Leadership - 01/09/2021
Mickael, thank you for your article the subject of bullying in the workplace is very important I have suffered from bullying as well and it leaves an indelible mark - and shows up in uncanny way in the context of adult life. I appreciate the difficult exercise of detailing one's own experience - it takes accepting to show oneself as "weak" which in our heroic star leadership culture is rarely welcomed - bravo You've also tried to show ways in which you can replicate bullying behaviors. which is crucial as we know from the study of abuse and addiction that perpetrators often have been victims. I am French, and in French we have a word for the victim "le souffre douleur" literally, he who suffers the pain. But we do not have a name to the perpetrator, no name for the bully. Which makes it hard to write an article on the subject. when we have no word we have a problem; but when we use a word beyond it's scope we also create a problem. In this respect, your article leaves me confused as you do not give any definition of what do you mean by bullying. You then tend to include Under this umbrella all sorts of behaviors such as criticism, lack of support, lack of interest, lack of care... this is not bullying. the scope become too large and diffused. In my view all actions or ways to interact that makes someone feel bad, not considered and even disrespected are not necessarily bullying. Can there be a pattern of the victim to tend to see bullies and bullying everywhere ? Bullying is not a one time occurence, it is a behavioral pattern, it is a trait of personality. Your use the term of "unintentional bullying" - but you do not define it either - is there such a thing ? It does not resonate with me. The bully always chooses his victims. Can you imagine a bully saying , "ooh I am sorry, did I bully you ? it was unintentional, really I am sorry, I didn't mean to , I apologize...." - (I wonder as I write this if this way to express critcism, will fall under your label of unintentional bullying ?) By being so broad, you miss aspects of bullying that from my point of view and experience are essential : such as the intention to make the other feel bad, the sadistic inclination, the pleasure of humiliation, the tactics, the importance of recurrence, the servitude; the internalization of shame... I would very much welcome a study of bullying in the workplace and/or in relation to leadership that would limit itself to bullying per se. If you know of any please let me know - and maybe you will be the one writing it. Thank you very much for opening the conversation
Claudius van Wyk on 12/21 - Clare W. Graves Revisited: Beyond Value Systems: Biocultural Co-evolution and the Double Helix Nature of Existence - 01/02/2021
An excellent integrative description of Graves' seminal work which contributes to the thinking of the Holos Project and the work of the Evolutionary Transformations Group.
An excellent summary of the main insights from Clare Graves. thank you. It contributes to the foundation thinking of Holos Project and the ET Group.
Said E. Dawlabani on 12/21 — Vision is Only the Beginning: Educators Talk about Highly Effective Leadership in Colleges and Universities - 12/28/2020
Dear David, As inspiring as this research is, I fear it leaves out much of the elephant in the room that is the disruption being caused by the Digital Age. I might as well have been reading a piece from the 1980's. Should higher education remain primarily a utility, ie a tool that helps people acquire skills for jobs, traditional 4-year colleges will become dinosaurs regardless of how much "innovation" people from within the system attempt to bring in. I didn't hear specifics on embracing the myriad of new platforms towards which much of the new generation is gravitating. Nor were there specific about shifts towards life-long learning that defines the future job market, an to a greater extent the structure of the future of society and the critical role that higher education plays in it. If you're familiar with the Spiral Dynamics model, most the responses you'rve listed from University presidents, deans and provosts are the recycling of Green and Orange values that have defined higher education for over a century. The future requires higher education to be designed from the much higher Yellow level of values that anticipate institutional disruption ahead of time and be on the cutting edge of social changes, not react with an old model designed from the highest levels of Orange and Green. Social disruption has gone exponential requiring models of education, governance and everything else to become lean, resilient, and capable of continuance change and adaptation. As brilliant as university educators are, they simply don't see the future from the much higher level of consciousness that comes from the Yellow stage of human development.
Antonio Augusto Casari Kós on 12/21 — Seeing Through the World: An Invitation to Begin the Healing Work - 12/27/2020
Thank you Cynthia for these great reflections on what integral is, or what it is meant to be. After a few years of contact with Wilber's work i begun to feel it as a rational (modern) framing, as you said a bidimensional, and quite cartesian reduction of an integral horizon that has many more dimensions than Wilber was able to comunicate. I am glad i found your blog. I guess i will be following you into aperspectival sanity :) Best regards
Robin Wood on 12/21 — Seeing Through the World: An Invitation to Begin the Healing Work - 12/24/2020
A stunning exposition of the Gebserian core, with all due credit to Jeremy's ability to clarify the key elements of Gebser's approach. This fresh interpretation of "aperspectival" as a grand embrace of all the structures of consciousness as a whole, and not a form of madness, is a real breakthrough in unblocking the head-centric character of most of the developmental models and the misleading idea of climbing a ladder, never to return to the ground of being as one ascends in altitude, eventually succumbing to the altitude sickness so prevalent in "second-tier" perspectives.
Lex Neale on 12/21 - Integral Reflections on Science and Spirituality with Peter Merry and Nish Dubashia - 12/23/2020
"...an evolutionary and metaphysical model that Nish had developed while still in his early twenties, and its possible correlations with modern physics and Eastern spirituality." Nish, my work with Integral Relativity Theory, and its praxis of Multi-Dimensional Science, had much of its inspiration from Bohm's model, and I would have dearly liked to have had the same discussion with him! So I'm very curious about your model, and ask you for some links that you may send to my email lexneale.integral@gmail.com If you are curious about Integral Relativity, I shall similarly send you links to my peer reviewed published papers, which hopefully may lead to a discussion regarding our two meta models. Thanks for the interesting discussion with Peter. Best wishes, Lex Neale
Ssendagire Julius on 12/21 – A Compassionate Civilization - 09/24/2020
Nice piece of work. Congs.Dr. Gitta
Kathleen Moylan on 1/15 – A Circle of Aiijaakag, a Circle of Maangag: Integral Theory and Indigenous Leadership - 09/10/2020
Hello Janice: I am a researcher living in the Yukon. I did graduate work at Royal Roads University in Environmental Education and Communication back in 2012 - 2015. I studied the theory of integral systems but have never had the opportunity to apply my knowledge. I am wondering where you received your practical knowledge of the integral model? And, where I could go to gain the applications? I hope to be able to use this knowledge as a practitioner in the Yukon for governments, NGO's and schools. Thank you in advance, Kate Moylan
Pratibha Gramann on 7/31 - Talking Transcendence: Scott Barry Kaufman in Dialogue with Alfonso Montuori - 08/13/2020
Liking the psychology that centers around Self-actuslization and self-trancendence, and whole person - these seem more relevant. I have a new framework for psychology based on Principles of the cosmos . It is Transpersonal and Transcendent. I'm interested to discuss the same and difference between these 2 concepts.
Marilyn Hamilton on 7/31 - The current state of Integral in Russia - 08/03/2020
Eugene - thanks so much for your panoramic history of Integral Life in Russia - I am deeply grateful to be mentionned (and to be so beautifully translated by you and published by iPratik). I have also enjoyed learning of all the other (parallel) integrally-informed activities that have been ongoing. Your contribution to the many translations with such a high ethic and clarity of intention, is inspiring and has no doubt created a momentum for the whole Integral field - not only in Russia, but Europe and other parts of the west as well. Thank you also for such a beautifully crafted article - which should be tagged as a significant curation of Integral history in Russia.
Jose on 7/31 - Corona-Crisis Exposes the Need for Transformative Leadership - 08/01/2020
Allemaal prima Jaap, maar wat als de UN de nieuwe 'regering' vormt?
Mind Meditation on 05/31 – The Assessment and Development of Analytical and Systems Thinking Skills in the Work Environment - 06/13/2020
This article is much information as it is based on research and reality. By reading these types of articles mind becomes relax ,. Mind meditation is also a mind relaxing activity.
sanae hanine on 8/15 – Integral Conscious Evolution - 02/16/2020
thank you so much gratitude .
Brian McConnell on 12/21 – Further Integrating Integral - 12/31/2019
First, and perhaps foremost, "Further Integrating Integral" heralds the "sea-change" of a revolution in mainstream science spawned by David Sloan Wilson's well-qualified work relating to "group" and "multi-level selection" and its potential impact on "politics, economics, and business". Secondly, and once I better appreciated the practical working of Wilson's evolutionary perspective, transdisciplinary facets began presenting themselves with tangible prospects for integrating Graves', Kegan's, and Theory U's respective models.
Edward Berge on 12/21 – Nurturing our Humanity with Riane Eisler - 12/27/2019
Speaking of creating new language to define a partnership society, I call it hier(an)archical synplexity to differentiate it from hierarchical complexity. From this piece:* "There is ample evidence that the collaborative commons is not only emerging but already has a solid foothold in the transition away from capitalism. It also seems to be growing organically via its peer to peer principles, changing the very ethos of what it means for a system to organize. It integrates hierarchy with heterarchy in a distributed, networked format that transcends capitalism's dominant hierarchical, top-down structure. This format is where organizational levels no longer evolve in a strictly linear fashion of an ever-increasing complexity of growth but via the evolution of a folded, meshed, ecological sustainability, akin to what I've come to call hier(an)archical synplexity" (p. 90). From capitalism to the collaborative commons: http://integral-review.org/pdf-template-issue.php?pdfName=vol_15_no_1_berge_from_capitalism_to_the_collaborative_commons.pdf
Lesley on 12/21 – Wayfinding for Perpetual Well-Being in Higher Education - 12/27/2019
Wayfinding seems well positioned as part of an education program. In this case you could not be anything but ' haoles', since that is based on origin.
Otto Laske on 6/16 – On Bhaskarian and Laskean Dialectics - 12/16/2019
This is the most perceptive article about my absorption of Bhaskar's work and the clearest sketch of 'Laskean' dialectic I have found. The reluctance of seeing in Bhaskar's work the beginning of a new dialogical epistemology is astounding to me; it seems to be easier to remain in a monological academic mode despite the pervasive and urgent need of listening-based dialogue at high levels of thinking the world over, not only in for-profit organizations. I think this is a sad story. For an attempt to turn the tide toward greater and pragmatic self-reflection based on adult-developmental research, see Jan De Visch's and my book on "Practice of Dynamic Collaboration" forthcoming at Springer in 2020. Thank you Michael for your very clear outline of the differences between Bhaskar's monological and my dialogical dialectic (which by the way owes a lot to Bruno Liebrucks, my Frankfurt teacher who wrote a 7-volume work on Hegel and his use of language, under the title of "Sprache und Bewusstsein", so far untranslated into English. I am convinced that knowledge of Liebruck's and my work could completely redefine the integral community's grasp of how the real world works.
Keifala Kanneh on 1/20 – Leadership in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Development Process - 11/16/2019
Every element of your research is significant and thought provoking. It is one of the amazing research materials I have encountered. It is going to be very useful for my research. Great work!
Narumon Jiwattanasuk on 4/7 – An Integral Perspective of Peace Leadership - 10/25/2019
I've studied PHD Peace studies in Thailand. May I consult with you accordingly.
Archives Select Month December 2020 (19) August 2020 (1) July 2020 (20) December 2019 (17) June 2019 (17) December 2018 (1) November 2018 (12) August 2018 (6) July 2018 (10) May 2018 (14) April 2018 (1) November 2017 (6) August 2017 (25) April 2017 (15) November 2016 (7) August 2016 (22) June 2016 (1) April 2016 (14) March 2016 (13) February 2016 (1) January 2016 (14) December 2015 (1) November 2015 (8) October 2015 (12) August 2015 (31) July 2015 (5) June 2015 (12) April 2015 (16) February 2015 (14) January 2015 (26) December 2014 (3) November 2014 (7) September 2014 (10) August 2014 (19) July 2014 (1) June 2014 (4) May 2014 (5) April 2014 (7) March 2014 (19) January 2014 (16) December 2013 (9) October 2013 (6) September 2013 (7) August 2013 (19) June 2013 (26) March 2013 (35) January 2013 (34) December 2012 (4) November 2012 (37) August 2012 (33) June 2012 (28) March 2012 (21) January 2012 (27) December 2011 (2) November 2011 (20) October 2011 (11) September 2011 (1) August 2011 (27) July 2011 (3) June 2011 (23) May 2011 (1) April 2011 (1) March 2011 (29) January 2011 (73) October 2010 (6) June 2010 (37) March 2010 (24) January 2010 (28) October 2009 (23) August 2009 (22) June 2009 (23) March 2009 (19) January 2009 (22) October 2008 (28) August 2008 (25) June 2008 (24) March 2008 (17) January 2008 (17) November 2007 (19) August 2007 (16) June 2007 (21) March 2007 (16) January 2007 (16) October 2006 (13) August 2006 (13) June 2006 (14) March 2006 (9) December 2005 (9) September 2005 (10) July 2005 (10) April 2005 (8) February 2005 (8) December 2004 (8) October 2004 (7) August 2004 (6) May 2004 (9) April 2004 (5) March 2004 (7) March 2003 (8) February 2003 (5) January 2003 (6) November 2002 (9) October 2002 (7) September 2002 (7) August 2002 (6) July 2002 (7) May 2002 (6) April 2002 (6) March 2002 (6) February 2002 (6) January 2002 (7) December 2001 (5) November 2001 (4) October 2001 (4) September 2001 (5) August 2001 (5) July 2001 (5) June 2001 (4) May 2001 (5) April 2001 (4) March 2001 (6) February 2001 (3) January 2001 (1)