Q: What does inverse_of do? What SQL does it generate? I'm trying to get my head around inverse_of and I do not get it. 
What does the generated sql look like, if any?
Does the inverse_of option exhibit the same behavior if used with :has_many, :belongs_to, and :has_many_and_belongs_to?
Sorry if this is such a basic question.
I saw this example:
class Player < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :cards, :inverse_of => :player
end

class Card < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :player, :inverse_of => :cards
end


A: Just an update for everyone - we just used inverse_of with one of our apps with a has_many :through association

It basically makes the "origin" object available to the "child" object
So if you're using the Rails' example:
class Dungeon < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :traps, :inverse_of => :dungeon
  has_one :evil_wizard, :inverse_of => :dungeon
end

class Trap < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :dungeon, :inverse_of => :traps
  validates :id,
      :presence => { :message => "Dungeon ID Required", :unless => :draft? }

  private
  def draft?
      self.dungeon.draft
  end 
end

class EvilWizard < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :dungeon, :inverse_of => :evil_wizard
end

Using :inverse_of will allow you to access the data object that it's the inverse of, without performing any further SQL queries

A: I think :inverse_of is most useful when you are working with associations that have not yet been persisted.  E.g.:
class Project < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :tasks, :inverse_of=>:project
end

class Task < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :project, :inverse_of=>:tasks
end

Now, in the console:
irb> p = Project.new
=> #<Project id: nil, name: nil, ...>
irb> t = p.tasks.build
=> #<Task id: nil, project_id: nil, ...>
irb> t.project
=> #<Project id: nil, name: nil, ...>

Without the :inverse_of arguments, t.project would return nil, because it triggers an sql query and the data isn't stored yet.  With the :inverse_of arguments, the data is retrieved from memory.

A: When we have 2 models with has_many and belongs_to relationship, it's always better to use inverse_of which inform ActiveRecod that they belongs to the same side of the association. So if a query from one side is triggered, it will cache and serve from cache if it get triggered from the opposite direction. Which improves in performance. From Rails 4.1, inverse_of will be set automatically, if we uses foreign_key or changes in class name we need to set explicitly. 
Best article for details and example.
http://viget.com/extend/exploring-the-inverse-of-option-on-rails-model-associations

A: If you have a has_many_through relation between two models, User and Role, and want to validate the connecting model Assignment against non existing or invalid entries with validates_presence of :user_id, :role_id, it is useful. You can still generate a User @user with his association @user.role(params[:role_id]) so that saving the user would not result in a failing validation of the Assignment model.

A: Take a look at this article!!
http://gsusmonzon.blogspot.com.br/2011/09/rails-power-of-inverseof.html

A: After this pr (https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/9522) inverse_of is not required in most cases.
Active Record supports automatic identification for most associations with standard names. However, Active Record will not automatically identify bi-directional associations that contain a scope or any of the following options:


*

*:through 

*:foreign_key


class Author < ApplicationRecord
  has_many :books, inverse_of: 'writer'
end

class Book < ApplicationRecord
  belongs_to :writer, class_name: 'Author', foreign_key: 'author_id'
end

a = Author.first
b = a.books.first
a.first_name == b.writer.first_name # => true
a.first_name = 'David'
a.first_name == b.writer.first_name # => true

In the above example, a reference to the same object is stored in the variable a and in the attribute writer.

A: From the documentation, it seems like the :inverse_of option is a method for avoiding SQL queries, not generating them. It's a hint to ActiveRecord to use already loaded data instead of fetching it again through a relationship.
Their example:
class Dungeon < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :traps, :inverse_of => :dungeon
  has_one :evil_wizard, :inverse_of => :dungeon
end

class Trap < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :dungeon, :inverse_of => :traps
end

class EvilWizard < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :dungeon, :inverse_of => :evil_wizard
end

In this case, calling dungeon.traps.first.dungeon should return the original dungeon object instead of loading a new one as would be the case by default.

A: Please take a look 2 two useful resources


*

*https://www.viget.com/articles/exploring-the-inverse-of-option-on-rails-model-associations

*http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Associations/ClassMethods.html#module-ActiveRecord::Associations::ClassMethods-label-Bi-directional+associations
And remember some limitations of inverse_of :

does not work with :through associations.
does not work with :polymorphic associations.
for belongs_to associations has_many inverse associations are ignored.

