The announcement by the US FCC chairman, Kevin Martin, to call for an open broadband network represents an opportunity within the US and abroad to show support for a policy that benefits all.
Inevitably there are several interests, and well represented in Washington, lobbying for preserving a fragmented, exclusionary, proprietary and closed model as the subject spectrum is reallocated from frequencies currently used by analogue television channels 52-to-69.
It is refreshing to read a call by the FCC advocating a policy contrary to the existing closed model and challenge industry towards offering an open, competitive and universal one.
The existing closed model sees a franchise to the benefit of few selected companies, characterized by a fragmented, exclusionary and proprietary services where units, such as cell-phones, and applications work only within each offering, country-club like.
In contrast, an open model sees it as a needed common, competitive service to benefit the community for a function that is not a luxury. It is a needed service in todays interconnected world with the added property that devices, phone-sets and applications should plug-and-play as required across competing offerings.
By having industry, interest-groups and ordinary citizens support an open access where any device, any application and any network provider offers phone, gateway to the Internet among other functions, via this spectrum, will ensure competition and universal availability of a common service grandchild of the lessons and experience of the Internet.
It will be equally interesting to have IBM, Microsoft, AT&T, Verizon Wireless, Sprint, et al to support the call for an open common service by the US FCC.
What will be even more important is that this call be an international one from Brazil, to Venezuela, Spain, France, Germany, Russia, India, China, Australia, Canada, etc, to join in a call supported by respective Governments, industry and citizen groups and request a service available everywhere common and universal as the Internet and GPS.
The availability of such a common connectivity spectrum will be of most benefit to inner-cities, displaced, rural and and remote communities. Content can be targeted to these communities to bring education and certification, health services, and monitoring and employment opportunities for police, forests, water quality and levels, roads, weather and environmental sensors, should be of special interest to countries with vast remote areas such as Canada, Russia, China, Brazil.
For Canada this service should be of special interest to the Federal Government to bring participation and presence to the north along with services to over 600 remote and native communities across the country. Contact Industry Canada and the CRTC and your local Provincial and Federal government representatives to solicit their view and support for an open common service as proposed in the US by the FCC - see related FCC upper 700 Mhz Band auction page here.
AT&T endorses FCC's call for an open wireless service.
Google bets on mobile market: CNet.
FCC approves some open wireless requirements: CNet.
FCC approves revised 700 MHz band plan and service rules: FCC.
Why it matters; good comments re subject.
The battle of models, open versus closed, is best exemplified by the running discord between Google and Verizon; have a look here and here.