Legal Humor. Seriously. By Kevin Underhill.
Circus and Carnival Litigation
Mascot Law
Criminal Mind, The
DSUWI (Driving Something Unusual While Intoxicated)
Inmates Keeping Busy
Needless 911
Lawmakers/Politicians
Laws (Dumb)
Laws (Odd)
Laws (Outdated)
Laws (We Shouldn't Need)
Legislatures at Work
Celebrigation
Lawsuits (Baffling)
Lawsuits (Ridiculous)
Lawsuits (Unlikely)
Lawsuits (Unnecessary)
Titanic Legal Battles
Attorneys in Action
Law Schools & Students
Rules of Professional Misconduct
Brilliant Arguments
Jury Duty (Avoiding)
Jury System
Autolitigation
Unnatural Law
Assorted Stupidity
Bad Disguises
Good Reasons to Kill
Lowering the Bar Exam Questions
Official State Crap
January 13, 2020 | Man Claims He Lost 500-Pound Emerald In Fire, But Some Have Questions
January 8, 2020 | TripAdvisor Sued for Negligent Camel Supervision
January 3, 2020 | Racist Pagan Goat-Murdering Lawyer Is in Trouble Again
December 31, 2019 | Another Year of Lowering the Bar
December 26, 2019 | Assorted Holiday Stupidity
December 19, 2019 | "Tell You What, Slick. This Profession Doesn't Need You."
December 17, 2019 | Tear Gas Fired to Disperse Lawyers
December 11, 2019 | Employee Says She Robbed Store to Teach Other Employees a Lesson
December 9, 2019 | "Perhaps Some of the Language 'Crossed the Line' of Civility"
December 3, 2019 | Congressman Pleads Guilty to Using Campaign Funds for Rabbit Travel
Home Unnatural Law
Accused Italian Cheese Witch May Get New Trial
(Photo: detail from "Witches' Sabbath," a woodcut by Hans Baldung (1510), © Trustees of the British Museum)
It won't do her any good, because she's been headless for 299 years now. But it's always nice to set the record straight.
The village council of Brentonico, in northern Italy, has voted overwhelmingly to reopen the case of Maria Bertoletti Toldini, who was convicted of a variety of ridiculous things and executed in 1716. It's not clear whether this means there will actually be a new trial—according to The Telegraph, the next step is to ask the Court of Appeal in Trento to reopen the matter—but it does seem to mean that the Brentoniconans would like to apologize, in a sense, for their ancestors' actions. Which, as I said, is nice.
Nicer, certainly, than their ancestors' decision to charge Toldini with, and execute her for, witchcraft, sacrilege, blasphemy, heresy, adultery, sodomy, and … what was the other thing … oh, right, "throwing a five-year-old boy into a pot of boiling cheese."
While a number of documents from the trial survive, it doesn't seem to be clear who first accused her of such behavior, or why. Toldini was a 60-year-old widow with no children who had remarried at the time of her arrest. The Guardian says that according to a local historian, she "was not a particularly extraordinary woman," which doesn't seem very nice, and probably translates to "I don't know why they did this." He speculated that she was probably targeted by members of her own family or other close associates because of an argument over some sort of property, which would fit the sad pattern of other such accusations.
Neither report offers any details of the evidence (if any) for the alleged child murder, or what witchcraft ritual they believed involved boy-flavored cheese. It is clear, though, that the upstanding citizens involved found Toldini guilty, had her publicly beheaded, and then burned her body.
Somebody waved a cross at it, though, so it's all good. (Photo: Franco Ottaviani)
Toldini was allowed to have a lawyer, the reports say, which was not normally the way these people rolled but may be some evidence, the historian said, that at this relatively late date people were starting to have some doubts about this witchcraft stuff. But this also seems like decent evidence that just because you provide some due process doesn't mean there aren't mistakes. The call for a retrial suggests that the villagers think there might just possibly have been one here.
Of course, people disagree as to whether apologizing for past atrocities is worth doing now. Compare, e.g., "Witch Pardoned" (Aug. 29, 2008) (noting that Switzerland and Virginia had decided it was) with "Witches Screwed Again in Connecticut" (Apr. 4, 2008) (noting that Connecticut decided otherwise). Some think the symbolic value is important. But some think it's a waste of time and money, and some think it's "an example of not acknowledging … history on history's terms," as one professor put it, although I guess I'm not sure what that means, exactly. The town's culture minister, who is spearheading the effort, acknowledged that some had questioned his initiative, but said that while he had listened carefully to input from the citizenry and fully valued and respected everyone's opinions on the matter, he continued to respectfully disagree: "I told them 'f-you,' as we say in Italy."
Well, words to that effect.
Witch Pardoned
Tax Fight Escalates as Romanian Witches Turn to Cat Excrement
Witches Screwed Again in Connecticut
"Crafty Science" and the Law
Cunning and Ruthless 'Survivor' Winner Still Ruthless, Not All That Cunning
Court Rules Woman Who Didn't Enter Lottery Not Entitled to Damages For Not Winning
San Francisco Manages to Spend $700K for a Wheelchair Ramp
Lessons in Avoiding Jury Duty
Man Who Expected to Die, But Didn't, Threatens To Sue Over Wrong Diagnosis
Luther Campbell of 2 Live Crew Is Running for Mayor of Miami
Please Bother Me: Daily Weekly
Find Even More Knowledge
Pleading Archive
Comical Case Names
Ridiculous Poll Archive
Case Law Hall of Fame
Noteworthy Court Orders
Lowering the Bar is—in all seriousness—a registered trademark of Kevin Underhill. It is written by Kevin Underhill, who is solely responsible for its content.
As the disclaimer states in much more detail, please do not consider anything you read here to be "legal advice." (Not that you would do that. This is for those other people.)
This site uses cookies, I think, but only to check whether you have voted in a Lowering the Bar poll or something like that. It doesn't collect any personally identifiable information.
© 2006-2019 Kevin Underhill CC 3.0