The organisation of IP systems profoundly affects the availability, scope and effectiveness of IP rights, since the quality of the existing regime—and the actors' awareness of it—determine firms' benefits from IP-protected intangible assets and, in consequence, their use of the IP system. That is, if the organisation of the IP system lacks legal quality, then the IP system will neither incentivise investments in innovation nor contribute to innovation in other ways (see Rationales of IP for innovation ). For that reason, how the IP system is organized is critical for its support of innovation performance.
IP law. Defining patentability criteria, patent examination guidelines (prior art searches), and patent proceedings in ways that best support innovation (see IP law ).
IP operations and procedures. Seeking improvements of patent examination processes to increase the quality of the examination without raising substantial additional costs (see IP operations and procedures ).
Enforcement and litigation. (1) Ensuring cost-effective mechanisms for IP dispute settlement; (2) Providing support for smaller firms in dealing with enforcement and litigation costs to enable a stronger level-playing field (see IP enforcement and litigation ).
International dimensions. Further improving the international IP framework through cooperation and the exchange of best practices (see International dimensions of IP systems ).
Strengthening IP skills and training by: (1) Organising public awareness campaigns via IP offices and other institutions; (2) Providing training, especially in the public research sector, on IP protection, valuation, and commercialization; and (3) Supporting specialised services to help firms identify suitable IP strategies for their businesses (see IP skills and training ).