Budget Briefing
Pro Digitization Insights
Pro EU Influence
Pro Morning Agriculture & Food
Pro Morning Energy & Climate
Pro Morning Financial Services
Pro Morning Health Care
Pro Morning Mobility
Pro Morning Tech
Pro Morning Trade
Pro Sustainability Insights
Pro Intelligence
Agriculture and Food Alerts
Brexit Alerts
Competition Alerts
Data and Digitization Alerts
Energy and Climate Alerts
EU Budget Alerts
Financial Services Alerts
Health Care Alerts
Mobility Alerts
Sustainability Alerts
Technology Alerts
Pro Calendar
Jens Schlueter/Getty Images
In Google privacy case, Europe's highest court to decide on future of the web
France's data protection regulator wants the so-called right to be forgotten to be applied globally.
By	Mark Scott
LUXEMBOURG — The future of the internet was put on trial Tuesday when Europe's highest court was charged with deciding if the region's tough privacy rules should apply solely within the 28-member bloc or across the entire world wide web.
Over seven hours of hearings, the European Court of Justice heard evidence from Google, France's data protection agency, as well as from a number of EU countries and freedom of speech advocates in a legal case involving the region's so-called right to be forgotten.
In a 2014 ruling, the Luxembourg court ruled that anyone with ties to the European Union could request that search engines such as Google and Microsoft's Bing service remove links about them, under certain circumstances.
Now, the same judges must decide if that privacy decision should be limited to within the EU's borders, or if search engines are required to remove that information from results anywhere in the world.
"The worldwide delisting system proposed by the CNIL is completely untenable" — Patrice Spinosi, Google's lawyer
The French privacy regulator had brought the case against Google, saying that citizens' rights could only be protected if the "right to be forgotten" is applied worldwide.
The final decision — expected sometime next year — will represent a landmark moment for the question of who has the right to police the global internet. It will determine if national governments and local agencies have the authority to apply their own standards to the rest of the world, or whether the global internet remains above legal challenges from any individual country.
The case has pitted privacy advocates, many of whom would like Europe's right to be forgotten rule to be extended worldwide, against freedom of speech campaigners, who claim the global application of the Continent's data protection laws may hamper people's freedom of speech.
Europe's chance to write the music for a generation
How Trump could hurt Google
Nancy Scola and Ashley Gold
"The proposed solution from the CNIL may be a bold one," Jean Lessi, secretary-general of the Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés (CNIL), the French privacy watchdog, told the ECJ judges Tuesday. "But it's based on a bold decision by EU officials."
Google rebutted the claims, and warned of the harmful effects that a global ruling would have on how people could access information over the internet if Europe is allowed to extend its own privacy standards worldwide.
The ECJ hearing comes amid growing concerns from policymakers in Brussels | Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
The search giant, which already removes certain links accessible to its European users to comply with the privacy ruling, said it would infringe others' right to access information. It added that the decision could also lead to more authoritarian regimes in Russia or China exporting their own digital restrictions outside of their borders.
"The worldwide delisting system proposed by the CNIL is completely untenable," Patrice Spinosi, Google's lawyer, told the court. "Such a system would unreasonably interfere with the freedom of expression and information, and induce endless conflicts with countries which do not recognize the 'right to be forgotten.'"
Future of the web
The ECJ hearing comes amid growing concerns from policymakers in Brussels, Washington and elsewhere about how some of Silicon Valley's biggest names, including Google and Facebook, have come to dominate much of the digital landscape.
That has led to increased regulatory pushback from politicians in the EU, United States and beyond to rein in some of the perceived excesses of these tech firms, many of which have garnered sizable cultural and financial influence as they extended their digital services worldwide.
As part of Google's efforts to comply with Europe's existing right to be forgotten rules, the search giant has removed 44 percent of the 723,000 requests made, involving 2.7 million links, that individuals made over the last four years, according to the company's latest transparency report.
The company initially only removed search results from European domains such as Google.de in Germany. But after EU national privacy regulators balked at such practices, Google agreed to erase those links from any of its domains, including Google.com, accessible from individual EU countries.
"It would be disastrous, not just for European citizens but for all internet users" — Emmanuel Piwnica, a lawyer for Microsoft
While Europe's highest court will make its ruling next year, the decision is unlikely to resolve the heated argument over how the internet should be regulated — a maddeningly difficult question that would involve governments worldwide agreeing to operating from the same rule book despite domestic differences on issues like online privacy and digital competition.
If the ECJ decides that Europe's privacy standards should apply globally — a ruling that is by no means certain — other jurisdictions, notably the United States, would likely challenge the decision by claiming Europe's efforts infringe on their own domestic rights, including the U.S.'s First Amendment.
Such an outcome, according to legal experts, could lead to different countries or regions implementing their own versions of internet regulation, making it more difficult for people from Lisbon to Lagos to share digital information across national borders.
"It would be disastrous, not just for European citizens but for all internet users," Emmanuel Piwnica, a lawyer for Microsoft, told Europe's highest court in reference to applying the region's privacy standards worldwide.
"A world in which one country or individual could impose their views to access information would not be acceptable."
Mark Scott
Data flows (in Data and Digitization)
Data flows (in Technology)
Data protection (in Data and Digitization)
Data protection (in Technology)
Platforms (in Data and Digitization)
Platforms (in Technology)
Privacy (in Data and Digitization)
Privacy (in Technology)
France (in Data and Digitization)
France (in Technology)
European Court of Justice (in Data and Digitization)
European Court of Justice (in Technology)
Pro Alerts
WHO declares Congo Ebola outbreak a global emergency
Canada eyes transatlantic alliance on drug prices, Dutch minister says
UK government suffers defeat on measure to constrain future PM
Open-ended funds need new liquidity test, FCA boss says
Regulate Facebook's Libra currency, France's Le Maire says
Finance minister joins international chorus of concern.
Pro Newsletters
POLITICO Pro Digitization Snapshot
POLITICO Pro Sustainability Snapshot
The investigation opens a new chapter in antitrust enforcement, examining how Amazon uses data gathered from merchants on its platform.
US regulators fine Facebook $5B for failing to protect users' privacy
Democrat lawmakers dismissed the record-high amount as 'chump change.'
EU struggles to pick next cybersecurity chief
A vote expected next week reveals power struggle between EU and capitals over cybersecurity policy.
Pro Agriculture & Food
Brexit Pro
Competition Pro
Data and Digitization Pro
Pro Energy & Climate
EU Budget Pro
Pro Financial Services
Pro Health Care
Pro Mobility
Sustainability Pro
Pro Technology
Pro Trade
Ready to go Pro?
POLITICO Pro is our premium policy intelligence service, providing the most distinct coverage of the EU and beyond.
Request a trial here and discover why thousands of politics and policy professionals rely on Pro every day to do their jobs.
For more information on our services, email pro@politico.eu or call +32 2 548 15 20.
Already a Pro? Log in here.