Thoughts on law, economics, and all things slightly geeky.
The Presumption Against Extraterritoriality vs. the U.S.'s Jurisdiction Over Invasions of its Neutral Rights: Can Chiquita and Balintulo Be Reconciled with the 18th Century Case Law on Extraterritorial Jurisdiction?
Posted on August 29, 2014 by Susan Simpson
In a 2-1 decision issued last month, the Eleventh Circuit granted Chiquita's motion to dismiss Cardona v. Chiquita Brands Int'l, Inc., a longstanding ATS case brought by four thousand Colombians alleging that, as part of its business operations in Colombia, Chiquita supervised and supplied a campaign of torture and murder conducted by Colombian terrorist organizations. In doing so, the Eleventh Circuit promptly broke the recent trend I sketched out in my previous post, by correctly applying the presumption against extraterritoriality to conclude that the ATS does not confer jurisdiction over "torture [that] occurred outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States."
The majority opinion also explicitly rejected the nascent "international rights and obligations" test that the Fourth Circuit applied in Al Shimari. Judge Martin's dissenting opinion just as explicitly adopted that test, and would have found jurisdiction over Chiquita on the grounds that "the United States would fail to meet the expectations of the international community were we to allow U.S. citizens to travel to foreign shores and commit violations of the laws of nations with impunity." But writing for the majority, Judge Sentelle (of the D.C. Circuit, sitting by designation) summarily dismissed Judge Martin's argument as a statement of policy rather than an applicable principle of law, finding that "[e]ven assuming the correctness of the assumption that the present complaint states violations of the law of nations, the dissent's observation is not relevant to our determination in this case." In other words: the presumption against extraterritoriality has no relationship with the U.S.'s foreign policy interests in complying with international obligations.
Chiquita is therefore the first firm rejection of the specialized (and misnamed) version of the presumption against extraterritoriality (a.k.a, the PAE-for-ATS) that the lower courts have distilled from Kiobel's intentionally ambiguous holding. Although the Second Circuit has previously declined to find jurisdiction in a post-Kiobel ATS case on similar grounds, that case, Balintulo v. Daimler, is unlike Chiquita in that the Second Circuit would have reached the same result regardless of whether it applied the PAE or the PAE-for-ATS. In Chiquita, by contrast, application of the PAE-for-ATS should have resulted in a finding of jurisdiction. But the Eleventh Circuit instead took the Supreme Court at its word, and applied the "traditional" PAE.
Posted in Alien Tort Statute	| Tagged ats, balintulo, chiquita, colombia, kiobel	| 1 Reply
Hi, I'm Susan. I'm a lawyer in Washington, D.C., and The View From LL2 is my place to talk about things that I am interested in.
To find out more about LL2, go here.
@bradheath Somewhere in DC, there were attorneys debating what was the best way to describe that clown suit, and the right attorneys won. 13 hours ago
@normative @nycsouthpaw Zero argument on that from me, and there's gonna be some super hard cases that will live in… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 13 hours ago
RT @EvidenceProf: Chester Hollman III talks about being exonerated after 28 years of wrongful conviction: cc: @Undisclosedpod @rabiasquared… 14 hours ago
@normative @nycsouthpaw Speaking as an advocate for the elimination of the idea that freedom of the press doesn't a… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 14 hours ago
@JDukakis @dandrezner Him and Doug Collins can share a lifeboat together. 14 hours ago
Follow @theviewfromll2
Subscribe to the View From LL2!
Enter your email address and receive notifications of new View From LL2 posts by email.
Alien Tort Statute (22)
CivPro and Unsubstantive Law (9)
Copywrong (13)
Craft Projects and Other Non-Legal Things (6)
Literature and Poetry and Other Pretentious Ramblings (7)
Marriage and the Constitution (12)
Serial: Blogging About a Podcast (23)
Statehood and Sovereignty (13)
The Law of Nations (13)
The Law of the Sea (14)
The View From L2 (Science Fiction and the Law) (15)
Video Games and the Law (6)
Serial: Why Jay's Testimony Is Not Credible Evidence of Adnan's Guilt
Serial: A Comparison of Adnan's Cell Phone Records and the Witness Statements Provided by Adnan, Jay, Jenn, and Cathy
Can you reuse a stamp from a mailed letter that did not get postmarked?
Serial: Evidence that Jay's Story was Coached to Fit the Cellphone Records
Lev Parnas and the "Very Harsh Message": A Look at the Evidence That Corroborates the May 12 Meeting
On Just Security – "Here's the Proof that Trump's 'No Quid Pro Quo' Call Never Happened"
On the Origins of Stormy Daniels' $130K Settlement Payment, and the Probability of the Disbursement Records Matching the Settlement Amount by Random Chance
International Law Notepad
adnan syed
Alien Tort Statute
corporate liability
customary international law
kiobel
salazar v. buono
Statehood and Sovereignty