Crack Spread
Frac Spread
Restructurings
See All Technology
Digital Oilfield
Well Stimulation
See All Exploration & Production
Top IP Wells
Emerging Plays
Field Development
Heavy Oil
Reservoir Evaluation
See All Transactions
Acquisitions & Divestitures
Lease Sales
See All Policy & Regulation
Health, Safety, & Environment
See All Midstream
Shale Plays
See All Shale Plays
Midcontinent
Texas/LA Gulf Coast
Drilling Activity
Database of selected U.S. and international exploration wells
Information on assets, buyers and sellers, deal values, and more.
New Financings
A searchable database of oil and gas debt and equity offerings.
A list of A&D professionals anywhere.
Prices for top E&P stocks and commodities.
Energy Datalink
Rextag database of energy infrastructure assets
Energy Innovators
Meritorious Awards for Engineering Innovation (MEAs)
Shale Technology Showcase
Veterans in Energy
Oil and Gas Investor
E&P Plus
Midstream Business Magazine
Playbooks, Techbooks and Yearbooks
A&D Watch Weekly
Midstream & Transport Monitor
Subsea Engineering News
A comprehensive source for coverage of the financial landscape of the oil and gas industry.
The latest technologies, technical solutions and strategies in Exploration, Drilling, Production and more.
Midstream Business
Connecting upstream production to the downstream sector and putting midstream in the center of it all.
Conferences Databases Publications Video
Single Comprehensive Environment For Interpretation, Static And Dynamic Modeling
Software combines static and dynamic modeling in a single program launched by one executable file.
Joe Lynch and Vasilii Shelkov, Rock Flow Dynamics
[Editor's note: This story originally appeared in the January 2020 edition of E&P. Subscribe to the magazine here.]
In the context of reservoir management, interpretation is the start of a process that has significant impacts downstream. Many decisions about how to manage reservoirs, especially very productive reservoirs, are based on results from reservoir simulation. But there are barriers on the journey from interpretation through modeling to simulation.
The topic of reservoir management has historically been divided into multiple areas: seismic interpretation, well interpretation, static modeling and dynamic modeling (or reservoir simulation). There are reasons for this: one is that different computer programs are used for each area and another is that they are performed by different disciplines. Geoscientists interpret and construct static models, and reservoir engineers characterize fluids and drive dynamic models.
In some less enlightened organizations, an "over-the-wall" mentality still exists at the boundary between the static and dynamic worlds. Once a geoscientist completes a static model, they never see it used. On the other side, the reservoir engineer does not see the static model on which their dynamic model is built until the geoscientist is finished. Sometimes a geomodeler is in a different department or even a different country from those performing the interpretation, and a similar communication problem exists. These examples are extreme but are indicative of the processes in some organizations.
There are multiple reasons for over-the-wall sickness. The reasons can be related to training, organizational design, office politics, personalities, etc. Until recently, the industry did not have a good solution to the problem that separate computer programs were required on the static and dynamic sides. Rock Flow Dynamics has removed this barrier with its tNavigator software, which combines static and dynamic modeling in a single program launched by a single executable file.
The tNavigator 3-D-gridded geobody is represented with seismic volume for backdrop and quality assurance. (Source: Rock Flow Dynamics)
Comprehensive workflows and fast performance
tNavigator covers the range from seismic interpretation, depth conversion, well correlation, reservoir structure, property modeling, fluid analysis (pressure volume temperature [PVT]), well modeling (vertical flow performance [VFP]) and reservoir simulation to surface network design. As part of this process, tNavigator includes much functionality that was previously performed in dedicated programs. This functionality includes well correlation, geostatistics, PVT, EOR, post-processing and history matching.
Underlying the tNavigator functional modules is a framework to capture, record and replay workflows. This, in turn, can connect to the optimization and uncertainty modeling engine (named AHM—Assisted History Matching) to deliver powerful solutions that cover the entire reservoir management domain.
Unlike some legacy programs, tNavigator was written using modern computing architecture with an ambition to be fast and scalable. This means that performance enablers such as parallelization are intrinsic in tNavigator. Parallel code is harder to write, but it delivers massive performance benefits.
GPU and adaptability
The modern computing architecture on which tNavigator is built has allowed it to adapt to new technologies quickly. A good example of this is the use of the GPU for processing more than just graphics. The use of modern GPUs can significantly speed up some reservoir simulations, particularly those simulations that spend proportionately a lot of time in the linear or nonlinear solvers. But the GPU is not the answer to all problems; modeling of aquifers, some well and surface network controls often can be better processed on the CPU. tNavigator allows the user to select the types of tasks sent to the GPU. Geoscientists are not left out from benefitting from GPU processing. Computationally expensive geostatistical algorithms also can be sent to the GPU. Initial tests indicate a speedup of more than four times in processing these calculations. This can make a difference in same-day versus next-day results for some complex stochastic geostatistical simulation runs.
Another beneficial result from developing on modern computing architecture is the ability to work on the computing hardware that clients have available—from laptop to workstation to cluster to the cloud, Windows or Linux, with or without GPU, for conventionals or unconventionals.
The diagram depicts tNavigator's functionality. (Source: Rock Flow Dynamics)
3-D grids
Additionally, tNavigator helps minimize the barrier of constructing a 3-D grid. Many geological uncertainty studies focus on facies and petrophysical modeling. There is little doubt that these are important parts of the workflow with significant uncertainty. But facies and petrophysical modeling have the advantage that they don't require the rebuilding of a 3-D grid for every realization.
Dealing with interpretation uncertainties upstream of 3-D grid building is a more complex process, as it does require the rebuilding of a 3-D grid. Some of these uncertainties can be very significant. They include seismic interpretation, depth conversion and well correlation. The tNavigator software has features that make 3-D grid building less of a problem and more feasible as part of a workflow. First is the availability of an unstructured gridding format for dealing with complex structures. Second is the speed and scalability of the tNavigator infrastructure to process the geometric calculations required. Then the result is a robust grid that is calculated rapidly.
tNavigator is a full-geoscience and full-physics approach to reservoir management. It includes a comprehensive environment for processing and analysis of static and dynamic models that allow multiple views of the data and results.
It also benefits from some of the advances in the worlds of artificial intelligence, machine learning, Big Data and analytics. Rock Flow Dynamics incorporates these methodologies where they deliver reliable results and speed up turnaround times. Examples include the traditional use of genetic-type algorithms and neural networks for history matching.
tNavigator is a single comprehensive environment for interpretation, static and dynamic modeling. Workflows can be cross-domain. tNavigator's modern computing architecture means improved speed and scalability. GPUs can benefit both engineers and geoscientists. The software adapts to solve specific problems in a user's environment using their language. The barrier of 3-D gridding is minimized. It is easy to convert projects and get started. The software also incorporates machine learning paradigms.
Whiting Petroleum In Deal Talks With Abraxas Petroleum: Sources
Whiting Petroleum, an oil and gas producer with operations in North Dakota and Colorado, is in deal talks with San Antonio-based Abraxas Petroleum, two people familiar with the matter told Reuters.
Blueknight Energy Partners to Sell Crude Oil Business for $162 Million
Blueknight Energy Partners LP has entered into multiple definitive agreements on Dec. 21 to sell its crude oil terminalling, pipeline, and trucking business segments for approximately $162 million in total cash consideration, including estimated crude oil linefill and inventory.
QEP Resources Receives $2 Billion Takeover Offer From Elliott Management
Activist investor Elliott Management offered to buy oil and gas producer QEP Resources in an all-cash deal valued at $2.07 billion, saying that the company is "deeply undervalued."
Subscribe to get unmatched coverage of the oil and gas industry's entire landscape.
Subscribe for free to our newsletters for the latest energy news
E&P Magazine
IndustryVoice®
Hart Energy Conferences
Rextag
Stratas Advisors
Hart Energy Store
Books & Supplements
Get Hart Energy
© 2021 Hart Energy. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part, in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.