#STC4All
Sepulveda Transit Corridor 101
Access and Equity
Submit Comment to Metro
Submitting public comment to Metro by February 11th is easy with our template and info!
1) Use the "Copy" button to automatically copy the template to your clipboard.
2) Send your comment to Metro by using the buttons below (your chosen sending format will not affect the validity of your comment).
Please use this template as guidance: we encourage you to add your own story for why you're #STC4All!
To the LA Metro Board of Directors with regards to the Sepulveda Transit Corridor Project;
I am writing to you to express my strong belief that a successful Sepulveda Transit Corridor alignment must include the following: a direct stop at UCLA, a direct stop at Westwood Village and connection to the Purple/D Line, and connectivity and continuity with the communities which it serves. With Metro's goals of improving mobility, accessibility, equity, and sustainability in mind, only the heavy-rail alternatives 4, 5, and 6 can provide a solution to the issues of traffic, pollution, and lack of connectivity that plague those living, working, and visiting the Westside region.
Investing resources in a project as large as the Sepulveda Transit Corridor should result in a system that enhances connectivity by taking people directly to the places they want to go. By Metro's own estimates, a UCLA stop is projected to be the most trafficked non-transfer stop in the entire Metro system, with a daytime population of over 84,000 equivalent to that of a mid-sized city. Alternatives 1 and 2's closest stops are 1.5 - 2 miles away from UCLA's campus, posing extreme first-last mile challenges for anyone trying to connect with UCLA and Westwood Village. This would dramatically decrease ridership to and from both UCLA and the Village as it could add upwards of 30 minutes of travel time, not to mention posing additional accessibility issues for pedestrians, wheelchair/assistive device users, and bikers. Any alternative (such as 1 or 2) that relies on a shuttle transfer is destined to fail.
A direct stop at UCLA and Westwood Village is not just an issue of connectivity. It's an issue of equity and accessibility to jobs, healthcare, education, and services around Los Angeles. UCLA, including its hospital and medical center, is the largest employer west of Downtown Los Angeles. The UCLA Ronald Reagan Hospital and Medical Center serves hundreds of thousands of patients each year. Over 47,000 undergraduate and graduate students attend UCLA, with over 20% of these students commuting each day from across Los Angeles. Due to extreme commutes, many along the Sepulveda Transit Corridor, up to 1 in 7 students experience housing and food insecurity. Westwood Village has over 2,300 businesses. Providing a direct stop at UCLA is an issue of equity in ensuring that all Angelenos have access to housing, employment, education, and healthcare in the Westside region.
As part of the environmental review process, it is important to consider impacts on traffic, emissions, and pollution. Not providing a direct stop in Westwood and UCLA will negatively impact Metro's environmental goals by decreasing overall ridership, as multiple transfer points increase travel time, decreasing the benefit of using a Metro system over driving. This eliminates alternatives 1 and 2. Alternative 3, while including a direct UCLA stop, lacks direct connectivity with a number of other Metro lines, including the Orange/G Line, the Purple/D Line, the Expo/E Line, and the future East San Fernando Valley Light Rail, plus Metrolink lines that connect to these Metro lines. Therefore, only Alternatives 4, 5, and 6 will ultimately contribute towards Metro's sustainability and VMT reduction goals, not to mention the environmental justice and public health issues associated with the monorail alignments running along the polluted 405 freeway. While these monorail options might be less expensive, is it worth investing any money at all in a system that won't achieve its goals?
The Sepulveda Transit Corridor Project has the potential to dramatically change the way we view transit in the Westside of Los Angeles. However, the monorail options without a direct stop at UCLA, a direct connection to the Westwood Purple/D Line, and direct connectivity to other Metro lines, will ultimately fail in achieving high ridership and access to key resources such as healthcare, employment, and education. Based on these criteria, as well as considerations of sustainability and environmental justice, I call upon the Metro board to eliminate or immediately adjust Alternatives 1, 2, and 3.
email Metro your comment
use Metro's Submission Form
SIGN UP HERE FOR OUR EMAIL LIST