<HTML><HEAD>
<TITLE>Review for Blair Witch Project, The (1999)</TITLE>
<LINK REL="STYLESHEET" TYPE="text/css" HREF="/ramr.css">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" TEXT="#000000">
<H1 ALIGN="CENTER" CLASS="title"><A HREF="/Title?0185937">Blair Witch Project, The (1999)</A></H1><H3 ALIGN=CENTER>reviewed by<BR><A HREF="/ReviewsBy?Gary+Jones">Gary Jones</A></H3><HR WIDTH="40%" SIZE="4">
<PRE>The Blair Witch Project  (6/10)</PRE>
<P>In 1994, three young and inexperienced documentary film-makers set off
into the Maryland woods to investigate the story of the Blair Witch, a
creepy figure of local folklore, said to be responsible for
disappearances and deaths over several decades. All that was ever found
of them was the footage they shot. This material was edited and the
result is presented here. It tells the remarkable story of how they
became lost in the forest and were tormented by strange unseen forces.
There's one often-overlooked aspect of this spooky tale that's worth
bearing in mind... it's not true. Let's just let that sink in a moment.
It's a story. They made it up. It didn't happen.</P>
<P>Some low-budget films have a structure or technical approach which flows
from a single cost-cutting idea. The excellent 1998 Canadian science
fiction film Cube was set in a huge maze of interconnecting cubic rooms.
A set was constructed of one such room, 18 feet on a side, and that's
where the whole film was shot. The Blair Witch Project takes a similarly
simple and retrospectively obvious idea to make a virtue of necessity:
the whole film is presented as the edited footage shot by the three
documentary makers and all this material was recorded by the three
actors playing the documentary crew. The actors were given a 16mm film
camera, a Hi-8 video camera and sound recording equipment, and each day
they were given some minimal direction and left to improvise a day's
shooting. The footage was collected at the end of each day in exchange
for food and the next day's story line. The real film-makers crept
around the actors' tent at night producing scary noises and preparing
strange artifacts for the increasingly uncomfortable cast to discover
the next day. The originality of this idea has been questioned, with
films such as Cannibal Holocaust and The Last Broadcast cited as earlier
examples of the mockumentary approach to horror movies.</P>
<P>The nature of the film lends itself to confusion about the reality of
the events depicted. When we see tired, hungry, cold and scared
characters on the screen, we are watching actors, but we are watching
tired, hungry, cold and scared actors. Many people seem to have had a
problem grasping the idea that the film is a work of fiction. Feeding
off the pre-millennial appetite for spooks and demons, the film-makers
deliberately fostered this confusion by using the actors' names -
Heather, Michael and Josh - for the characters and presenting the film
as a true story in promotional material. The official web site, for
example, provides extensive "factual" background material on the
(completely made-up) Blair Witch story and the unfortunate trio. The
story is also presented as truth in many of the unofficial web sites
which fuelled interest in the film. These sites were supposedly produced
by fans of the movie, but it has been suggested, although the film-
makers deny it, that some were actually professionally-produced
publicity sites masquerading as fan sites.</P>
<P>There is no violence or gore in the film (apart from a small lump of
unidentifiable bloody matter), no special effects and no visible
monsters or spooks - the story is told purely through the reactions of
Heather, Michael and Josh to what goes on around them. The three
performances are convincing, but it is hard to know to what extent we
are watching acting or a recording of three very uncomfortable people.
The story goes that the actors had to sign releases indicating that they
would not hold the film-makers liable for any psychological damage they
might suffer as a result of the harsh shooting conditions. In order to
see the performances, of course, the characters had to film each other
when they might have been expected to have more important things to do,
such as make their documentary, find their way out the woods, or run
around screaming. This is explained by the pushy Heather, who does much
of the most personally intrusive filming and claims to want to record
their experiences as well as make a documentary. I wasn't really
convinced by this explanation, but how else could we have a movie to
watch?</P>
<P>The film has so far made around $140,000,000 in the US - not bad for a
movie that cost around $40,000 to make (although the distribution
company that picked it up spent an extra $100,000 on the film, mainly on
improving the sound quality). It is hard to know what the film's writer-
directors, Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sanchez can do next. They have made
one of the most successful films of all time, and the money people will
be throwing cash at them, yet they've made an unrepeatable freak of a
film, with no evidence that they will have a clue about how to make
another movie.</P>
<P>The Blair Witch Project is a triumph of marketing, and raises some
interesting issues about what's real and what isn't in movies. The
technical approach is novel, but this in itself isn't enough to sustain
a feature film. There are a few creepy moments, and a the final scene is
pretty chilling, but the scariest film ever made? Hardly. When the
making and marketing of a film is more interesting than the film itself,
you know there's something wrong.</P>
<P>-- 
Gary Jones <A HREF="mailto:<gary@bohr.demon.co.uk>"><gary@bohr.demon.co.uk></A>
Homepage: www.bohr.demon.co.uk
PGP public key available from servers (DH/DSS key ID: 0x11EAE903)</P>
<HR><P CLASS=flush><SMALL>The review above was posted to the
<A HREF="news:rec.arts.movies.reviews">rec.arts.movies.reviews</A> newsgroup (<A HREF="news:de.rec.film.kritiken">de.rec.film.kritiken</A> for German reviews).<BR>
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.<BR>
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.<BR>
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.<BR>
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
</SMALL></P>
<P ALIGN=CENTER>Related links: <A HREF="/Reviews/">index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews</A></P>



</P></BODY></HTML>
