Discovery and Settlement
The Revolution & Confederation
The Founding
Early Republic
Expansion and Sectionalism
Industrialization and Urbanization
Progressivism and World War 1
The Great Depression and the New Deal
Cold War America
Contemporary America
House Approves Seventeen Amendments
The Congress Sends Twelve Amendments to the States
First Annual Message
Letter to Mrs. Orville Browning
State of the Union Address (1838)
The Great Nation of Futurity
John L. O'Sullivan
Letter to John Johnston
Letter to John D. Johnston
Eulogy of Henry Clay
Means of Elevation
Martin R. Delany
A Glance at Ourselves — Conclusion
Things As They Are
Letter to Owen Lovejoy
The Lincoln-Douglas Debates 3rd Debate Part I
The Lincoln-Douglas Debates 3rd Debate Part II
The Lincoln-Douglas Debates 4th Debate Part I
The Lincoln-Douglas Debates 4th Debate Part II
Letter to Jesse W. Fell
The Constitution and the Union
Conquest of Mexico
Disquisition on Government
National Disfranchisement of Colored People
Letter on the Mexican-American War
Editorial Regarding Walker's Appeal
Garrison's Defense of His Positions
William Lloyd Garrison to Thomas Shipley
Number of Slaves in the Territory Enumerated, 1790...
US Census Bureau
Chapter 13: War with Mexico
Mr. Tallmadge in the Congressional Globe
Speech to Congress
James Tallmadge Jr.
Letter to John Holmes
Southern Runaway Slave Notices and "Our Peculiar D...
The Webster-Hayne Debates
To The Public
Truisms
Religion and the Pure Principles of Morality: The...
Lecture Delivered at Franklin Hall
Maria W. Miller Stewart
"On the Constitution and the Union"
American Anti-Slavery Society, Declaration of Sent...
Constitution of the American Anti-Slavery Society
Appeal to the Christian Women of the South
Angelina Grimké
Appeal to Christian Women of the South
Slavery a Positive Good
Speech on Abolition Petitions
Protest in Illinois Legislature on Slavery
First Inaugural Address (1837)
Letters on the Equality of the Sexes and the Condi...
Sarah Grimke
"The Right of the People, Men and Women, to Petiti...
Declaration of Sentiments Adopted by the Peace Con...
Poster Advertising Sale of a "Valuable Gang of You...
The Temperance Address
Address to the Slaves of the United States
Letter to Richard Pakenham, British Minister to th...
The American Union
Letter to Williamson Durley
Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An Am...
Wilmot Proviso
Speech on the Mexican War
Andrew Kennedy
American Slavery
The War With Mexico: Speech in the United States H...
Speech on the Oregon Bill
What Are the Colored People Doing for Themselves?
An Address to the Colored People of the United Sta...
State of the Union Address Part I (1848)
Annual Message to Congress
The Address of Southern Delegates in Congress to t...
Prejudice Not Natural: "The American Colonization...
Uses and Abuses of the Bible
Caution!! Colored people of Boston
"What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?"
"What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?"
Emigration of the Colored People of the United Sta...
Our Elevation in the United States
Letter to Harriet Beecher Stowe
Appeal of the Independent Democrats
Appeal of the Independent Democrats in Congress to...
Nebraska Territory
Speech on the Kansas-Nebraska Act and Racial Hiera...
R.M.T. Hunter
Fragments on Slavery
Speech on the Repeal of the Missouri Compromise (P...
Kansas: To Those that Desire that Kansas Should be...
Sociology for the South, or, The Failure of Free S...
George Fitzhugh
Sociology for the South, or The Failure of Free So...
Broadside Advertisement for Runaway Slave
The Doom of the Black Power
Letter to George Robertson
Letter to Joshua F. Speed
The Last Flogging
Democratic Party Platforms
Forcing Slavery Down the Throat of a Free-Soiler
John L Magee
Dred Scott v. Sandford
Roger Taney
Benjamin R. Curtis
Reply to the Dred Scott Decision
Free & Slave-holding States and Territories
A. K. Johnston
Cotton is King
"Mud Sill" Speech
Dred Scott and Disunion
House Divided Speech
Homecoming Speech at Chicago
Speech at Chicago, Illinois
Speech in Reply to Douglas at Springfield, Illinoi...
Fragment on Slavery
The Lincoln-Douglas Debates 1st Debate
The Lincoln-Douglas Debates 2nd Debate
The Lincoln-Douglas Debates 5th Debate
Letter to J. N. Brown
"An Irrepressible Conflict"
African Civilization Society
Address before the Wisconsin State Agricultural So...
"The Whole Affair Seems the Work of a Madman"
Henry Wise
"John Brown Not Insane"
John Brown and the Principle of Nonresistance
Address at Cooper Union
Republican Party Platform (1860)
Democratic Party Platform of 1860
Douglas Faction
Southern Desperation
South Carolina's Declaration of the Causes of Sece...
Distribution of the Slave Population by State
The Fugitive's Song
Fragment on the Constitution and Union
Defense of Lincoln
The Folly of Colonization
Social Change and Reform
Inaugural Address (1825)
Thomas Jefferson to Roger Chew Weightman
Chapter 11: The Nullification Crisis
CIRCULAR: Addressed to Benevolent Ladies of the Un...
Catherine Beecher
Speech on President Jackson's Veto of the Bank Bil...
The Nature, Importance, and Means of Eminent Holin...
Edward Beecher
A Plea for the West
The Perpetuation of Our Political Institutions Add...
The Perpetuation of Our Political Institutions (Ly...
The Laboring Classes
Orestes Bronson
"Song of the Spinners" from the Lowell Offering
Record of the Organization and Proceedings of The...
Massachusetts Lawmakers Investigate Working Condit...
State (Colonial) Legislatures>Massachusetts State Legislature
Seneca Falls Resolutions
Women's Rights Convention
Declaration of Sentiments
Time Table for Lowell Mills
Marriage Protest
Henry Blackwell
San Francisco Vigilance Committee
Consistent Democracy
The Significance of the Frontier in American Histo...
Federalism/Union
Speech on Preserving the Union
South Carolina's Ordinance of Nullification
Force Bill of 1833
Excerpts from Ratification Documents of Virginia a...
Ratifying Conventions>New York Ratifying Convention
An Address…Celebrating the Declaration of Independ...
Rough Draft of What is Called the South Carolina E...
State of the Union (1829)
Remarks in Congress on the "Tariff of Abominations...
Robert Y. Hayne
On the Nullifying Doctrine
Worcester v. Georgia
Proclamation Regarding Nullification
Epitaph for the Constitution
Lyrics to Jackson and the Nullifiers
Second Inaugural Address (1833)
Farewell Address (1837)
Fragment on Government
Speech on the Repeal of the Missouri Compromise
An Act to Organize the Territories of Nebraska and...
Letter to Henry L. Pierce, and Others
Letter to Henry Pierce and Others
The Dividing Line Between Federal and Local Author...
Speech on the Mexican-American War
Missouri Compromise Act
Veto Message of the Bill on the Bank of the United...
Debate on the National Bank Filibuster
Parties/Elections
Voter Qualification Law
New Jersey State Legislature
Message to the Senate Protesting the Censure Resol...
Balloting for President
Speech on Assuming Office of the President
Religious Views: Letter to the Editor of the Illin...
Great Speech of Clay
The Seven Stages of the Office Seeker
Edward Williams Clay
Speech at a Republican Banquet
Letter to Lyman Trumbull
Democratic Party Platform 1860 (Douglas Faction)
(Northern) Democratic Party Platform Committee
Democratic Party Platform 1860 (Breckinridge Facti...
(Southern) Democratic Party Platform Committee
Commercial Republic
Address to the Wisconsin State Agricultural Societ...
The Commercial Greatness of the United States
Lowell Factory Girls Association
Special Message to Congress (Tyler Doctrine)
Estranged Labour and The Communist Manifesto
"The Ten Hour System"
Sarah G. Bagley
State of the Union Address Part II (1848)
The Destiny of America, Speech at the Dedication o...
What a Revival of Religion Is
An Address. . .Celebrating theDeclaration of Indep...
Baconianism and the Bible
Benjamin Morgan Palmer
The Revelation on Celestial Marriage: Trouble Amon...
Ann Eliza Young
Mormonism and Jesuitism
F.W. Gunsaulus
Breckinridge Faction
Speeches on the Removal Power
Hon. Francis O. J. Smith to Secretary of State Dan...
Francis O.J. Smith
Special Message to the House of Representatives
Special Message to Congress on Mexican Relations
Speech on the War with Mexico
Political Chart: Presidential Campaign
Defense and War
First Annual Message to Congress
War Message
Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Cooper
Letter to the Editors of the National Intelligence...
Debate on the Constitutionality of the Mexican War
Market Speech
Recollections of the War
Letters and Journals from the Oregon Trail
Remarks at the Women's Rights Convention
Senator Timothy Pickering to President Thomas Jeff...
The Embargo Act
President James Madison to Secretary of State Robe...
Speech to the U.S. House of Representatives
Annual Message The Monroe Doctrine
Selected Dispatches
Joel Poinsett
Correspondence Between Anthony Butler and Presiden...
Spot Resolutions in the U.S. House of Representati...
The Ostend Manifesto
Address to the People of the United States, by the...
Second Annual Message to Congress
Contract Timeline
by James K. Polk
Lincoln's Apple of Gold
ByEllen Tucker
Join Us for Meaningful Professional Development
Documents in Detail: "Against American Imperialism"
No study questions
No related resources
In his Raleigh Letter of April 1844, Henry Clay (1777–1852) had warned that the annexation of Texas by the United States would likely lead to war with Mexico, which had never fully recognized the independence of its former province. Following the U.S. annexation in 1845, the Mexican government severed diplomatic relations with the United States. President James Polk (1795–1849) subsequently sent an envoy, former Louisiana congressman John Slidell (1793–1871), to Mexico to try to resolve disputes over the Texas boundary and over damages that the Mexican government allegedly owed to U.S. citizens. Slidell was instructed to offer up to $30–40 million to pay off Mexico's debt in order to acquire "Upper California and New Mexico." Polk also ordered a contingent of American forces, led by Gen. Zachary Taylor (1784–1850), to occupy the territory between the Rio del Norte (Rio Grande) and the Nueces River, which both Mexico and Texas claimed.
When Mexico refused to sell, Polk began to prepare a declaration of war. Before its completion, however, he received reports from Taylor that Mexican forces had killed or wounded sixteen U.S. soldiers in the disputed territory. On May 11, 1846, Polk presented a special message to Congress announcing that "war exists" between the two countries because the Mexican government had "at last invaded our territory and shed the blood of our fellow-citizens on our own soil." The message reviewed Polk's diplomatic efforts (not reprinted below) but did not mention the offer to purchase New Mexico and California. It also described the movement of American troops and the subsequent, in Polk's view, unwarranted aggression by Mexico. On May 12, 1846, Congress voted to approve a declaration of war against Mexico, or, literally, a declaration that a state of war now existed.
To ensure that Britain would not become involved in the war, Polk negotiated an agreement with London over the boundary of the Oregon Territory, which had been left unresolved by the Convention of 1818. Polk wanted a boundary that gave the United States access to a Pacific port and was prepared to compromise well short of the line of maximum American claims (54°40´, well into what is now British Columbia). This concession angered some anti-British northern Democrats, who adhered to the party's popular slogan of "54-40 or fight" during the presidential campaign of 1844. Some Whig Party antislavery advocates, like John Quincy Adams, favored expansion but only into free territory. Ultimately, the Oregon Treaty of 1846 extended the boundary along the 49th parallel from the Rockies to the coast, leaving Vancouver Island in British hands and Juan de Fuca Strait between Vancouver Island and the Olympic Peninsula open to both countries, with the United States in possession of the lower Columbia River and the future port of Seattle, Washington.
Source: James K. Polk, Special Message to Congress on Mexican Relations, online, by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project,https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/200910.
The existing state of the relations between the United States and Mexico renders it proper that I should bring the subject to the consideration of Congress. In my message at the commencement of your present session on the state of these relations,[1] the causes which led to the suspension of diplomatic intercourse between the two countries in March 1845, and the long-continued and unredressed wrongs and injuries committed by the Mexican government on citizens of the United States in their persons and property were briefly set forth.
. . . Thus the government of Mexico, though solemnly pledged by official acts in October last to receive and accredit an American envoy, violated their plighted faith and refused the offer of a peaceful adjustment of our difficulties. Not only was the offer rejected, but the indignity of its rejection was enhanced by the manifest breach of faith in refusing to admit the envoy who came because they had bound themselves to receive him. Nor can it be said that the offer was fruitless from the want of opportunity of discussing it; our envoy was present on their own soil. Nor can it be ascribed to a want of sufficient powers; our envoy had full powers to adjust every question of difference. Nor was there room for complaint that our propositions for settlement were unreasonable; permission was not even given our envoy to make any proposition whatever. Nor can it be objected that we, on our part, would not listen to any reasonable terms of their suggestion; the Mexican government refused all negotiation, and have made no proposition of any kind.
In my message at the commencement of the present session I informed you that upon the earnest appeal both of the Congress and convention of Texas I had ordered an efficient military force to take a position "between the Nueces and the Del Norte." This had become necessary to meet a threatened invasion of Texas by the Mexican forces, for which extensive military preparations had been made. The invasion was threatened solely because Texas had determined, in accordance with a solemn resolution of the Congress of the United States, to annex herself to our Union, and under these circumstances it was plainly our duty to extend our protection over her citizens and soil.
This force was concentrated at Corpus Christi, and remained there until after I had received such information from Mexico as rendered it probable, if not certain, that the Mexican government would refuse to receive our envoy.
Meantime Texas, by the final action of our Congress, had become an integral part of our Union. The Congress of Texas, by its act of December 19, 1836, had declared the Rio del Norte to be the boundary of that republic. Its jurisdiction had been extended and exercised beyond the Nueces. The country between that river and the Del Norte had been represented in the Congress and in the convention of Texas, had thus taken part in the act of annexation itself, and is now included within one of our congressional districts. Our own Congress had, moreover, with great unanimity, by the act approved December 31, 1845, recognized the country beyond the Nueces as a part of our territory by including it within our own revenue system, and a revenue officer to reside within that district has been appointed by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. It became, therefore, of urgent necessity to provide for the defense of that portion of our country. Accordingly, on the 13th of January last instructions were issued to the general in command of these troops to occupy the left bank of the Del Norte. This river, which is the southwestern boundary of the state of Texas, is an exposed frontier. From this quarter invasion was threatened; upon it and in its immediate vicinity, in the judgment of high military experience, are the proper stations for the protecting forces of the government. In addition to this important consideration, several others occurred to induce this movement. Among these are the facilities afforded by the ports at Brazos Santiago and the mouth of the Del Norte for the reception of supplies by sea, the stronger and more healthful military positions, the convenience for obtaining a ready and a more abundant supply of provisions, water, fuel, and forage, and the advantages which are afforded by the Del Norte in forwarding supplies to such posts as may be established in the interior and upon the Indian frontier.
The movement of the troops to the Del Norte was made by the commanding general under positive instructions to abstain from all aggressive acts toward Mexico or Mexican citizens and to regard the relations between that republic and the United States as peaceful unless she should declare war or commit acts of hostility indicative of a state of war. He was specially directed to protect private property and respect personal rights. . . .
The Mexican forces at Matamoras assumed a belligerent attitude, and on the 12th of April General Ampudia,[2] then in command, notified General Taylor to break up his camp within twenty-four hours and to retire beyond the Nueces River, and in the event of his failure to comply with these demands announced that arms, and arms alone, must decide the question. But no open act of hostility was committed until the 24th of April. On that day General Arista,[3] who had succeeded to the command of the Mexican forces, communicated to General Taylor that "he considered hostilities commenced and should prosecute them." A party of dragoons of sixty-three men and officers were on the same day dispatched from the American camp up the Rio del Norte, on its left bank, to ascertain whether the Mexican troops had crossed or were preparing to cross the river, "became engaged with a large body of these troops, and after a short affair, in which some sixteen were killed and wounded, appear to have been surrounded and compelled to surrender."
The grievous wrongs perpetrated by Mexico upon our citizens throughout a long period of years remain unredressed, and solemn treaties pledging her public faith for this redress have been disregarded. A government either unable or unwilling to enforce the execution of such treaties fails to perform one of its plainest duties.
Our commerce with Mexico has been almost annihilated. It was formerly highly beneficial to both nations, but our merchants have been deterred from prosecuting it by the system of outrage and extortion which the Mexican authorities have pursued against them, whilst their appeals through their own government for indemnity have been made in vain. Our forbearance has gone to such an extreme as to be mistaken in its character. Had we acted with vigor in repelling the insults and redressing the injuries inflicted by Mexico at the commencement, we should doubtless have escaped all the difficulties in which we are now involved.
Instead of this, however, we have been exerting our best efforts to propitiate her good will. Upon the pretext that Texas, a nation as independent as herself, thought proper to unite its destinies with our own she has affected to believe that we have severed her rightful territory, and in official proclamations and manifestoes has repeatedly threatened to make war upon us for the purpose of reconquering Texas. In the meantime we have tried every effort at reconciliation. The cup of forbearance had been exhausted even before the recent information from the frontier of the Del Norte. But now, after reiterated menaces, Mexico has passed the boundary of the United States, has invaded our territory and shed American blood upon the American soil. She has proclaimed that hostilities have commenced, and that the two nations are now at war.
As war exists, and, notwithstanding all our efforts to avoid it, exists by the act of Mexico herself, we are called upon by every consideration of duty and patriotism to vindicate with decision the honor, the rights, and the interests of our country. . . .
In further vindication of our rights and defense of our territory, I invoke the prompt action of Congress to recognize the existence of the war, and to place at the disposition of the Executive the means of prosecuting the war with vigor, and thus hastening the restoration of peace. To this end I recommend that authority should be given to call into the public service a large body of volunteers to serve for not less than six or twelve months unless sooner discharged. A volunteer force is beyond question more efficient than any other description of citizen soldiers, and it is not to be doubted that a number far beyond that required would readily rush to the field upon the call of their country. I further recommend that a liberal provision be made for sustaining our entire military force and furnishing it with supplies and munitions of war.
The most energetic and prompt measures and the immediate appearance in arms of a large and overpowering force are recommended to Congress as the most certain and efficient means of bringing the existing collision with Mexico to a speedy and successful termination.
In making these recommendations I deem it proper to declare that it is my anxious desire not only to terminate hostilities speedily, but to bring all matters in dispute between this government and Mexico to an early and amicable adjustment; and in this view I shall be prepared to renew negotiations whenever Mexico shall be ready to receive propositions or to make propositions of her own. . . .
1. [3]
Prior Document
See Our List of Programs
Conversation-based seminars for collegial PD, one-day and multi-day seminars, graduate credit seminars (MA degree), online and in-person.
Check out our collection of primary source readers
Our Core Document Collection allows students to read history in the words of those who made it. Available in hard copy and for download.
Edit Collection
Update Collection