Bakke Revisited
John C. Jeffries Jr.
Supreme Court Review
In the Michigan affirmative action cases, the Supreme Court not only reaffirmed the result of the 1978 decision in Board of Regents of the University of California v. Allan Bakke, but specifically endorsed the opinion and reasoning of Justice Lewis Powell. At the time, Powell spoke for himself alone. None of his colleagues embraced his position, which was widely seen, by both liberals and conservatives, as internally contradictory and incoherent. Yet twenty-five years later, Powell carried the day. This essay explores the evolution of Powell's position from eccentric outlier to received wisdom and offers comments on the lessons that can be drawn from that experience. It is a preliminary draft of an essay that will appear, as edited, in the Supreme Court Review.
John C. Jeffries Jr., Bakke Revisited, 2003 Supreme Court Review 1-25 (2003).
Unoriginal Textualism
The burgeoning debates about constitutional interpretation show no signs of abating. With surprisingly few exceptions, however, those debates involve... MORE
Enforcement Lawmaking and Judicial Review
Payvand Ahdout
It is—and has long been—well known that the Executive's power is expanding. To date, there are two dominant analyses of the Judiciary's role in that... MORE
The City in the Future of Federalism
Cities have been largely absent from the theory and doctrine of federalism, especially in the U.S., where federalism discourse is invariably... MORE
Localism All the Way Up: Federalism, State-City Conflict, and the Urban-Rural Divide
One characteristic of this age of political polarization is increasing conflict between states and their cities. Pandemic-related regulation has been... MORE
The Global Evolution of Foreign Relations Law
Kevin Cope
Pierre-Hugues Verdier
Mila Versteeg
The constitutional rules that govern how states engage with international law have profound implications for foreign affairs, yet we lack... MORE
Vaccine Passports as a Constitutional Right
Does the U.S. Constitution guarantee a right to a vaccine passport? In the United States and elsewhere, vaccine passports have existed for over a... MORE
Leading Cases in Constitutional Law, A Compact Casebook for a Short Course
An annually-revised paperback designed for a single-semester course on constitutional law, this book is roughly half the length of many hardcover... MORE
Constitutional Locks
Michael D. Gilbert
Legal designers use different mechanisms to entrench constitutions. This article studies one mechanism that has received little attention:... MORE
Standing and Privacy Harms: A Critique of TransUnion v. Ramirez
Through the standing doctrine, the U.S. Supreme Court has taken a new step toward severely limiting the effective enforcement of privacy laws. The... MORE
Binding the Unbound Executive: Checks and Balances in Times of Pandemic
Emergency governance, we are often told, is executive governance. Only the executive has the information, decisiveness, and speed to respond to... MORE
Empirical Constitutional Studies: Future Directions
Our new book—How Constitutional Rights Matter—tries to answer a difficult empirical question: do constitutional rights actually change government... MORE
Vested Rights, "Franchises," and the Separation of Powers
Caleb E. Nelson
Modern courts and commentators have had trouble distinguishing the kinds of decisions that require "judicial" power from the adjudicative tasks that... MORE
Protecting Free Exercise Under Smith and After Smith
Douglas Laycock
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia is an important win for religious liberty. The Supreme Court protected a Catholic agency's ability to continue... MORE
Active Virtues
Constitutional theory has long been influenced by the idea that the Supreme Court exercises "passive virtues," avoiding politically divisive cases... MORE
Algorithmic Fairness, Algorithmic Discrimination
There has been an explosion of concern about use of computers to make decisions – from hiring to lending approvals to setting prison terms –... MORE
Direct Collateral review
Federal courts are vitally important fora in which to remedy constitutional violations that occur during state criminal proceedings. But critics have... MORE