Despite generating huge revenues, California's Indian casino industry has been dealt some questionable hands. Political interests have begun to swirl like a roulette ball around fresh efforts to legalize internet gambling statewide.
But voters have been confronted by unpopular plans to expand brick-and-mortar gaming. And customers in at least one high-profile instance have been confronted by an all-too-literal conflict within tribal casino owners.
Both cases have underscored a new reluctance among Californians to treat Indian gambling operations with the degree of generosity extended by Sacramento.
Earlier this month, voters rejected Proposition 48 — a measure designed to approve the state's legal authorization for a new, off-reservation casino.
AP reported Gov. Jerry Brown signed off on the plan because it would have precluded putting the casino on "environmentally sensitive" locations in Humboldt County.
It would have allowed the North Fork Rancheria Band of Mono Indians to construct a massive, 2,000-slot building 40 miles away from its reservation. It lost, 61-39.
Regardless, the tribe's spokesman Charles Banks-Altekruse told AP the failure of Prop. 48 would simply lead to another deal at a later date. "What's next is we'll go back and get another agreement and we'll build the casino with another compact," he said.
The ordeal reflected a potentially rancorous political situation, where voters struggle against lawmakers — ultimately unsuccessfully — to impose limits on California gaming. According to the Las Vegas Review-Journal, California's Indian casinos generate nearly $7 billion in revenue per year, a figure that makes up a fourth of gaming totals nationwide.
The combination of big money and government regulation that drives Indian gaming expansion well could turn voters who won the fight against Prop. 48 into losers.
According to Jeff Heiman, the Southern California managing director of Tribal Financial Advisors, the defeat of Prop. 48 actually works to the advantage of a troubled casino. The Chukchansi tribe, currently feuding over its Chukchansi Gold Resort and Casino in the town of Coarsegold, recently sent patrons fleeing as a former tribal leader staged an armed raid of the property last month.
The shocking attack, however, was just the latest twist in a factional fight that closed Chukchansi last month. As Heiman suggested to the Fresno Bee, the big financial interests with a large stake in Chukchansi and other Indian casinos will be more apt to work out a deal since Prop. 48 hasn't put another massive gaming project on the table.
Now temporarily closed (the above image is of the front page of its website), Chukchansi has cost the tribe millions in lost revenue — an especially large poker chip to swallow given the unfavorable terms the tribe had worked out with its creditors.
As the Bee noted, the tribe agreed in 2011 to restructure its debt at an interest rate of 9.75 percent.
In fact, the Bee reported, the October raid was launched to "recover financial records" about audited financial statements from the past two years. Because the audits were late, the National Indian Gaming Commission slapped Chukchansi with an order imposing the temporary closure.
The trouble faced by Chukchansi has exposed the way the economy surrounding Indian gambling often allocates revenues more to financial concerns than to tribal members.
Generating some $100 million a year, the Bee calculated, only about $12 million a year from the casino went to the Chukchansi tribe. The remainder was divided between bond payments, payroll and operating costs.
As a result, tribes face continued pressure to expand casino operations, especially into online gambling.
As a Republican, Adelson will wield even more clout when the GOP takes over the U.S. Senate in January.
Mr. Adelston should get out of the way of online gaming, he's rich enough to survive anything.
Mr. Adelson should get out of the way of online gaming, he's rich enough to survive anything.
How many more gambling addicted seniors, asians and service workers do you want?
Check out the demographics of hapless casino patrons, the run of the mill food services and general seedy din of these temptation pits!
Ugly on lots of levels.
Indian gaming might have been a blessing 15 years ago, but it has become a very heavy curse on the tribal communities and the casino patrons. This is because of greed. Gaming parasitizes those who are unable to turn away from the cheesy tricks that make them flush what little discretionary cash they might have down a black hole. Blinking lights, repetitive sounds, 'winnings' that are timed by computer, booze, meth, you name it, gamblers really are zombies and I pity them.
Tribal communities have also been ripped to shreds by gaming, with one political faction taking control and disenrolling (kicking out) a large portion of the community, with the sole incentive of getting bigger checks for the survivors. Ugly. Only one or two tribal communities come to mind that have had the discipline to use gaming constructively as an initial boost to the tribal economy, followed by sensible diversification into non-gaming business assets.