Nurturing better conversations about dying.
Understanding the EOLC Act
Unpack The Issue
Unpacking the End of Life Choice Act 2019
Disability, Mental Illness, and the EOLC Act
Justice Select Committee Submissions
Suicide Risks
Seales v Attorney-General
Doctors Say No
Newstream
Homepage, News
Landmark Canadian court case proves euthanasia safeguards aren't there
20 March 2018 Communications Officer
"The current landmark court case in Canada again reinforces the fact that laws legalising euthanasia cannot provide safeguards that work," says Dr Peter Thirkell, Care Alliance Secretary.
Roger Foley has cerebellar ataxia, a terminal and incurable severe brain disorder that limits movement and leaves him unable to perform basic tasks independently. He wants to be able to live at home, but has instead been offered only two options: a forced discharge from hospital or medically assisted death. Because of this, Mr Foley is suing the hospital, several health agencies, and the attorneys general of Ontario and Canada.
"The Canadians haven't had their law for very long and yet already we can see that the idea of choice is a myth – real choices are not available for patients to be assisted to live," says Dr Thirkell. "This is happening in the same country that David Seymour calls "advanced" with a law that he points to as an example to be followed."
"Mr Foley's case highlights the substantial dangers that people with disability and serious chronic and life-limiting medical conditions will face if Mr Seymour's End of Life Choice Bill is passed."
Under the End of Life Choice Bill, it is not necessary for a patient to have their basic needs met before seeking euthanasia, and there is no obligation to ensure real alternatives are explored; the patient must simply be "aware" of them.
"The Bill targets people who may have complex health needs, and who rely on our health system for care. We should be providing the highest standard of care and support to live, which meets those needs."
"True patient-centred care enables the best living possible, personalised to the patient where appropriate medical expertise and care is properly provided. That's what palliative and hospice care does and that's why palliative and hospice care should be invested in."
"Mr Foley wants to live and the irony is that it is the availability of legal euthanasia and assisted suicide that marks for him the end of any choice for life."
The Care Alliance stands in solidarity with Mr Foley in his action to be assisted to live to, as he says, "build my circle of care that works with me".
Published at Scoop NZ.
For all media enquires please contact Dr Peter Thirkell, Care Alliance Secretary
secretary@carealliance.org.nz
Tagged assisted suicide, Canada, Care Alliance, chronic medical condition, David Seymour, End of Life Choice Bill, euthanasia, hospice, palliative care, Peter Thirkell, Roger Foley, terminal illness
Published by Communications Officer
View all posts by Communications Officer
Previous postKylee Black: End of Life Choice Bill alarmingly ambiguous for disabled people
Next postCalling a spade a soil relocation aid
List choice Nurses Say No Doctors say no
Care Alliance supporter pins
Buy a supporter pin
© 2018 Care Alliance