Equality Before the Law
Supreme Court Cases
Fight Back and Win
Economic Liberty (96)
Equality Under the Law (45)
Free Speech and Association (147)
Property Rights (548)
Separation of Powers (170)
Blog > Issues > Property Rights > Can Kanye West solve L.A.'s housing crisis? Not if city bureaucrats have their way
Can Kanye West solve L.A.'s housing crisis? Not if city bureaucrats have their way
December 03, 2019 I By PHILLIP BADER
If you only know Kanye West from his music (or the Award Show Interruption Heard Round the World), you would be forgiven for being more than a little surprised by the headline above. But there are few things about Kanye West that aren't surprising.
This past summer, Kanye began work on a new housing community in Los Angeles, developing a series of dome-like structures on a 300-acre plot he owns. The plan was to treat the nascent community as low-income housing, with the long-term goal of creating a community that would "break the barriers that separate classes," according to Kanye himself.
California faces one of the largest homelessness crises in the nation, and Kanye was experimenting with ways to address that on his own property, on his own dime. It would have cost the government nothing to allow him to try to solve the problem.
Yet not long after work started, city officials, spurred by complaints from neighbors incensed by the noise from the construction, informed Kanye he had to either acquire certain permits, or tear down the structures. Ultimately, the project was scrapped and the structures were destroyed.
All of this leads me to what I am fairly certain is a never-before-typed sentence: Kanye's foiled attempt at housing construction illustrates the importance of property rights to address the need for affordable housing.
Whatever your thoughts on his music (answers may range from "genius" to "wouldn't play at my worst enemy's funeral"), Kanye was, by any objective measure, trying to accomplish something good here. In setting his sights on a solution to the city's affordable housing crisis, Kanye was taking action to solve a problem Los Angeles city officials have failed to properly address.
And it's a very real problem: By the most recent official count, Los Angeles County has a homeless population of just under 59,000, while the number for the entire state of California comes to 130,000. To put that in perspective, that's more than the entire population of 23 different state capitals. Within the L.A. metro area, Orange County alone saw a 50 percent increase in homelessness in 2018.
This growth persists in spite of (or, as some critics would say, because of) continual spending by local and state governments. According to the L.A. Times, Los Angeles spent $619 million on homelessness last year, largely funded by additional sales taxes and higher taxes on businesses.
Yet the government shut down Kanye because he didn't properly ask permission first. Kanye was willing to do the project of his own free will, and still that wasn't enough. He had to do it according to the government's plan and procedures. There is no evidence Kanye's project had construction troubles, faulty planning, or anything worth being shut down over (short of "you didn't ask permission first"). According to some sources, the main reason the state inspector came by was because of noise complaints by neighbors. The stated permitting issue was because the structures had concrete bases, so they weren't covered by the temporary permits Kanye had already obtained.
Even if Kanye's offenses were somehow unforgivable, why did the city immediately turn to shutting down the project completely, rather than letting Kanye obtain the correct permits and papers? With how much money they are throwing into housing efforts, you'd think they would welcome any additional help, especially from someone with the resources of a multimillion-dollar music icon. But no. Even if you're building on your own legally obtained property, if you don't make sure the government is okay with your decisions, you will be shut down.
Just look at Curtis Martin, who partnered with the Natural Resources Conservation Service to make a series of ecologically sound improvements to a creek on his property. Yet the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) swooped in, defining the creek as a "navigable water," and demanded Curtis give them control over any and all improvements. PLF is helping Curtis defend his property rights in a lawsuit against the EPA.
You shouldn't need government permission to do good work on your own property. But government has a long track record of violating property rights and shutting down potentially beneficial private social projects solely because a property owner didn't get their blessing first.
Regardless of how loud Kanye's bulldozers may or may not have been, there was a better solution to shutting down the project entirely. L.A. residents deserve less heartless bureaucrats.
The Environmental Protection Agency considers dirt in a farmers field pollution October 15, 2019 I By TONY FRANCOIS
A Rancher's property rights and the right to conserve August 28, 2019 I By TONY FRANCOIS
Help PLF defend liberty and
The fight to protect liberty and justice never ends. Since 1973, donor-supported PLF has successfully litigated to enforce the Constitution's guarantee of individual liberty, with an unmatched track record at the U.S. Supreme Court. Your support empowers countless Americans to fight back and win, at the same time you safeguard the liberties of everyone.
Contact Plf Donate
For Media:
If you are on deadline or need immediate assistance, please call our media team at
media@pacificlegal.org
Pacific Legal Foundation is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. © Pacific Legal Foundation, 2020.