Even an idiot of the week can learn
Kathleen Wallace (COUNTERPUNCH) explains how awful Bernie Sanders is:
One thing perplexing about the current situation is this: Does the DNC really even want to win? Continued, generalized venom abounds in their treatment towards the left and even Sanders exudes petulant bitchiness towards his own previous staffers and surrogates. I'm thinking in particular of his statement in regard to Briahna Joy Gray when asked about her refusal to endorse Biden. He snarkily said "She is my former press secretary—not on the payroll." One shouldn't be surprised though, because he did the same treatment to surrogate Zephyr Teachout. She had an op-ed piece awhile back saying that Biden had a corruption problem. Bernie apologized….to Biden. Bernie is very good at letting down his supporters. He would be the dad you come home to and complain that a bully beat you up. He would listen with attention and care, but then march you over to the bully's house to apologize for sinking to the bully's level.
More along the lines of do they really want to win??? The Biden campaign had an unbelievable sticker to pull in the vote, I guess….one that showed "plutocrat" and "socialist" crossed out and replaced with "proud democrat". The inevitable conclusion is that they don't want the Bernie supporters who identify with socialism and are fueling up to come off as distasteful to the Independent voters who decide general elections. I'm sure the plutocrats aren't concerned. They win no matter what. The conclusion I come to is that they are ready to lose, in fact are fine with it, as their class will be protected. Despite the obvious embarrassing optics of a Trump presidency, the meat of it is that these types do well under his policies. It's seeming to be a lot like theater and being continuously dismissive to the left, to the point of overt hostility will keep voters away from Biden. It's too much to have been played in a rigged process and then to have literal insult added on. The continued gaslighting coming from a progressive talking-points babbling Obama the last few days is enough to replace all the worlds ipecac syrup. But it won't make Charlie Brown try again for Lucy's football. Just once I wish Charlie Brown would have beat the shit out of Lucy for that. That might make Lucy stop. Voting for Biden won't make them stop.
Bernie was a coward. He really was. He betrayed us all. I guess that makes us the idiot of the week. If you can't handle that, I'll grab the title all by myself, I'll be idiot of the week.
I thought, if nothing else, Bernie would stay in the race until all the primaries were over but he couldn't even do that. He couldn't do anything but scrape and bow to the DNC and now to Joe Biden.
I'm not voting for Joe.
Screw Bernie. And screw me. I let him betray me in 2016 and in 2020.
In 2016, they stole the nomination from Bernie and even after WIKILEAKS exposed that, he was a good little soldier marching along behind Hillary.
In 2020, he stole the nomination from himself by refusing to actually fight for the nomination and by refusing to even stay in the race. 26 primaries remain but Bernie's out of the race. He should have dropped out long ago, if he was going to drop out. Then people could have gotten behind Elizabeth Warren or someone else.
Instead, he lied and said he was in the race until the end.
He will not fool me again. He had a livestream yesterday. Didn't bother to view it, don't care what was said.
Even if it's an issue I believe in, he's demonstrated that he can not be trusted, that he will not fight for what is needed.
See, I can learn, even an idiot like me. Maybe there's hope for us all.
Well maybe not hope for Ruth Marcus. An idiot can learn, I don't know that a whore can. Ruth whored to attack Tara Reade this week. Mike Davis calls her out here.
Tara Reade doesn't deserve to be attacked and it's very telling that the supposed journalists like Ruth Marcus (and Michelle Goldberg and Joan Walsh and . . .) would rather use their power to attack a basic human being than to hold the powerful accountable.
But they aren't journalists, are they? Journalists are people like Julian Assange. Real journalists hold the powerful accountable. That's why we have the effort to destroy Julian.'
This Tweet gets it:
Retweet if you believe that Julian Assange has been persecuted for exposing corruption.
PRIMO NUTMEG
@PRIMONUTMEG
Friday, April 17, 2020. Biden Bullies are getting desperate in their attempts to silence and ignore Tara Reade.
Joseph Kishore is running for the presidency of the United States. He is representing the SEP. At WSWS, he notes:
In the days after formally ending his campaign and endorsing Joe Biden, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders has intensified his efforts to dragoon his supporters into backing the right-wing standard bearer of the Democratic Party establishment.
In an interview with the Associated Press published on Tuesday, Sanders slandered as "irresponsible" any of his supporters who do not campaign for Biden. "Do we be as active as we can in electing Joe Biden and doing everything we can to move Joe and his campaign in a more progressive direction?" he asked. "Or do we choose to sit out and allow the most dangerous president in modern American history to get reelected?"
There is widespread anger and opposition among workers and youth to Sanders' craven capitulation to Biden in a livestreamed eventon Monday. Sanders' response is to declare: "I believe that it's irresponsible for anybody to say, 'Well, I disagree with Joe Biden—I disagree with Joe Biden!—and therefore I'm not going to be involved.'"
As he did in 2016, but now under much more explosive social and political conditions, Sanders is exchanging his "political revolution against the establishment" for the thin gruel of "lesser evil" politics.
A few points in reply to Senator Sanders.
First, support for Biden means support for the social interests that he represents and the program that he is advancing. Biden, who was first elected to the US Senate from the state of Delaware in 1972, has spent nearly four decades as a faithful servant of the ruling class. He has an extensive record of support for war, austerity, capital punishment, and mass incarceration.
The present catastrophe caused by the coronavirus pandemic is the consequence of policies pursued by the ruling class and its representatives, Democratic and Republican alike, for decades, with Biden playing a critical role. Endless resources have been funneled into the stock markets and the military, while social infrastructure has been dismantled and inequality driven to record highs.
As a member and then chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Biden was one of the principal proponents of the US bombing of Yugoslavia (1999) under Clinton, and the US invasions of Afghanistan (2001) and Iraq (2003) under Bush. He voted for the Patriot Act and the expansion of illegal domestic spying after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, boasting that the legislation was modeled off a bill he had drafted in 1995.
Biden also voted for the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999, a milestone in the deregulation of the banks, vastly increasing the ability of giant financial institutions to engage in speculation and plunder. In 2005, Biden aggressively campaigned for the overhaul of consumer bankruptcy laws, making it much harder for working class families to escape debt burdens.
As vice president under Obama, Biden oversaw the bailout of the banks in 2008-09 as well as the wars in Libya, Syria and Yemen. This was in addition to the continued occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan and the vast expansion of drone assassinations as an instrument of US foreign policy.
Amidst all of this, nothing was done to prepare for a pandemic, despite repeated warnings from scientists and epidemiologists. The Democrats, no less than the Republicans, are responsible for the destruction of health care infrastructure and the criminal lack of stockpiles of ventilators, face masks and other critical equipment.
No wonder Bernie lost. What a loser. What an idiot and fool. No one worshiped Bernie. Those who supported him were supporting him because of the issues. Now with Joe Biden doing nothing to address issues such as Medicare For All or ending endless wars, Bernie comes along to hector. No one cares. He's a betrayer and he has no one to 'command.' The notion that he can lead sailed long ago and everyone knows he endorsed a man accused of rape. Yes, on CBS NEWS, he did note that Tara needs to be heard.
But apparently, she doesn't need to be heard before Bernie endorses Joe.
Tara spoke out weeks ago. Asked by CBS NEWS, Bernie has no opinion and states he doesn't know enough to weigh the accusation. So a man is accused of rape and Bernie doesn't know whether the allegation is accurate or not? Wasn't he required to make some sort of determination before endorsing Joe?
And does he get how offensive and out of it he looks when he says Tara deserves to be heard but -- by golly, by gum -- everyone better fall in line behind Joe Biden.
Sorry, Bernie, some of us care about issues like rape. By that, I don't mean some of us write rape fantasies down and publish them the way Bernie did, I mean that some of us believe you take a firm stand in support of survivors or nothing ever changes.
I'm also getting tired of the bully boys insisting that we must vote for Joe Biden -- you must do what you must do, you can't tell anyone what they must do -- and we have to because, well, look at Donald Trump. They want you to know that families are being destroyed by Donald separating families via his deportation policies.
Donald still hasn't deported as many people in his time as president as Barack Obama did at the same time in his presidency. There's a reason Barack was dubbed "the deporter in chief." I'm sorry that so many whores think we're going to be tricked and conned.
But let's set the deportation issue aside.
Families destroyed under Trump so we need Biden?
Barack and Joe bombed Muslims repeatedly.
What the you-must-vote-for-Joe group is really saying is: We need a president who kills people but does so over there, away from home, so we can pretend it's not happening.
That's what so many disgusting people have done, ignoring The Drone War, ignoring everything.
A Ruth Marcus is a disgusting, middle-aged to elderly type person who has accepted a world in which corruption and murder are the norm and they are carried out by whomever occupies the Oval Office. She's a tired hag who whored out any sense of responsibility long ago and wants to whore everyone else out.
But everyone else isn't an empty shell or waiting to take orders from bullies.
In an editorial, THE COLLEGIAN notes:
When The New York Times finally did report Reade's allegations on April 12, the paper tweeted this: "We found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Biden, beyond hugs, kisses and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable." But they quickly edited the sentence, removing "beyond hugs, kisses and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable," because the Biden campaign told them to do so.
Any individual who is accused of a crime is innocent until proven guilty. But these cases — just like those of Blasey Ford, Ramirez, and Swetnick — should be respected, taken seriously, and investigated properly.
Last April, eight women, including Reade, publicly claimed that Biden assaulted them. But then, and now, the media has remained mostly silent.
In a Q&A, New York Times Executive Editor Dean Baquet said that the paper's reporting on Kavanaugh was different than their treatment of Biden because Kavanaugh "was already in the public forum in a large way."
Right, because being a presidential candidate, former vice president, and former senator is not "in the public forum in a large way."
The media is choosing to silence Reade and protect Biden.
Maybe Biden and his supporters in the media should take his own advice: When a woman alleges sexual assault, presume she is telling the truth. If we're going to #BelieveAllWomen, let's believe Lucy Flores, Amy Lappos, D.J. Hill, Cailtyn Caruso, Ally Coll, Sofie Karasek, Vail Kohnert-Yount, and Tara Reade.
It's Michigan's oldest college newspaper and, as we've repeatedly noted over the last weeks, college newspapers have led on the Tara Reade story. There's a reason for that. They're not dead inside like Ruth Marcus. They didn't sell or whore their souls years ago. They still have integrity and the belief in a better world.
That's what the Ruth Marcus-Joan Walsh-Jessie Valenti-Michelle Goldberg crowd never gets. They didn't get in 2016 and they don't get it now. They don't speak to college students, they have no idea what's going on. In March, we had to move our talks to online encounters but we're still speaking to groups -- including college students -- and the Tara Reade issues is not going away. No matter how many paid whores show up to try to dismiss it.
Let's note another student paper, Boston's THE DAILY FREE PRESS, where Gabriella Aponte observes:
Dear mainstream media, are you playing favorites?
Let's be clear. The media was absolutely right to report and verify the allegations against Kavanaugh and Trump and anyone else accused of raping and assaulting innocent women.
The problem, here, is that the mainstream media seems to have a way of prioritizing certain victims over others. Ford's allegations instantaneously dominated the headlines for weeks, but what about Reade?
Reade's allegations have barely made a dent in the news cycle and even the Time's Up organization, formed to aid women in this kind of situation, wouldn't help her. Time's Up reportedly turned Reade away, not for a lack of evidence, but because she was accusing a public official, something that could impact the nonprofit's tax-exempt status.
Once Reade was finally able to come forward with her full story, it took 19 days for the mainstream media to report on it. And when they did, they made it very clear whose side they were really on.
In its article entitled "Examining Tara Reade's Sexual Assault Allegation Against Joe Biden," The New York Times reported they "found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Mr. Biden, beyond the hugs, kisses and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable." The Times later deleted that portion of the paragraph, admittedly at the request of the Biden campaign.
Did they delete or edit any portion of their story at Reade's request? No, I didn't think so.
If that sly edit doesn't convince you of favorable bias towards the Biden camp, just take a look at the article's subheading.
"Ms. Reade, a former Senate aide, has accused Mr. Biden of assaulting her in 1993 and says she told others about it. A Biden spokeswoman said the allegation is false, and former Senate office staff members do not recall such an incident," it reads.
Why would former staff members recall an incident they were never party to or never told about? Reade never claimed to tell those specific staffers about the incident and she admits there were no eyewitnesses to the assault. So why include this information — information that proves absolutely nothing — in the subheading, if not to undermine Reade's story from the get-go?
Ruth Marcus and her unethical kindred have no idea of the conversations taking place across this country. Let's go back to the corporate media. At REAL CLEAR POLITICS, Mark Hemingway takes on NYT's Dean Baquet:
The allegations have been all over the Internet since March 25. Tara Reade, who worked for Biden when he was a senator, alleges in 1993 Biden pushed her up against a wall and digitally penetrated her without her consent, while telling her, "Come on man, I thought you liked me."
To address the growing criticism that the Times sat on the story for political reasons, the Times also published an interview with Baquet under the headline: "The Times Took 19 Days to Report an Accusation Against Biden. Here's Why." The headline promised an explanation, but the only thing the story delivered was humiliation for Baquet and his newspaper.
The Times' recently hired media critic, former BuzzFeed Editor Ben Smith, asked Baquet some obvious questions about the paper's coverage, including why the paper never hesitated to report on the sexual assault allegations against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Here's Baquet's answer to that question in full:
"Kavanaugh was already in a public forum in a large way. Kavanaugh's status as a Supreme Court justice was in question because of a very serious allegation. And when I say in a public way, I don't mean in the public way of Tara Reade's. If you ask the average person in America, they didn't know about the Tara Reade case. So I thought in that case, if The New York Times was going to introduce this to readers, we needed to introduce it with some reporting and perspective. Kavanaugh was in a very different situation. It was a live, ongoing story that had become the biggest political story in the country. It was just a different news judgment moment."
The executive editor of the of the New York Times is actually arguing that Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court nomination meant he was already subject to scrutiny, but Joe Biden's presidential campaign is not a "public forum in a large way." This is absurd.
His further equivocating didn't help. Baquet stated that "Kavanaugh's status as a Supreme Court justice was in question because of a very serious allegation." But what constitutes a serious allegation when it comes to sexual assault? By almost any standard, Reade's accusations against Biden are far more "serious," not to mention more credible, than the accusations brought against Kavanaugh just a year and a half ago. For instance, no one disputes that Reade worked for Biden and had some contact with him. To this day, no one has presented any outside evidence Kavanaugh and his accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, ever even met.
The four witnesses Blasey Ford named as being present at the party where Kavanaugh allegedly tried to assault her all refused to corroborate her story. Yet, The Washington Post, lacking any corroboration, rushed to print with Blasey Ford's accusations, touching off a national firestorm.
The Times, at Baquet's direction, quickly joined the frenzy. In the interview on the Biden accusations, Ben Smith specifically asked Baquet to justify the Times' treatment of Kavanaugh. To his credit, Smith noted that the Times also regurgitated additional -- and truly absurd -- claims that as a young man Kavanaugh had regularly participated in suburban gang rape parties.
These lurid tales were spun by Julie Swetnick, who has history of being party to dubious lawsuits, and her now-disbarred lawyer Michael Avenatti, who at the time had been accused of numerous instances of fraud and has since been convicted of extortion. Yet, the Times reported the Swetnick allegations the same day they were made, even though their report noted "none of Ms. Swetnick's claims could be independently corroborated."
Baquet is probably correct when he asserted, "If you ask the average person in America, they didn't know about the Tara Reade case." But why is that? Although her allegations were aired extensively by conservative media and among the Bernie Sanders-supporting left, for weeks there was a near total blackout of the story by the legacy media, including the Times.
As the Washington Free Beacon recently noted, "Joe Biden has been asked 81 questions in over two hours' worth of media interviews since a former staffer in his U.S. Senate office accused him of sexual assault three weeks ago. He hasn't fielded a single question about the allegation." If the average person doesn't know about Reade's allegations, it's because gatekeepers such as Dean Baquet chose not to inform them.
Of the press attacks on Tara Reade, Carl Beijer argues:
It's at least worth noting, I think, how the Biden campaign has been working behind the scenes to shape media coverage of the allegation. It's worth noting how the last few weeks of silence from these pundits could be read, to the cynical, as a comms team saying "now's not the right time" or "let's see if this blows over." It's worth noting how the timing of these articles, released one after the other over three days starting on Monday, look a whole lot like a messaging rollout. It's worth noting that in 2016, Jessica Valenti was caught coordinating her coverage with the Clinton campaign, while Goldberg flat-out admitted it. And it's worth noting, in passing, how all three pieces are curiously on-message: "we can't know for sure what happened, but many of the critics have bad motives, and [Valenti and Walsh assure us] we'll vote for Biden regardless."
To my eye, the timing, the messaging, and the actors all make this look a whole lot like a comms operation — particularly since we know that Biden's team has been working to shape the coverage.
In January, various members of Iraq's government was condemning foreign interference in Iraq. For some of the flakes in the US, it was time for applause. They took off from screaming that war on Iran was going to start in days -- still hasn't, by the way -- to applaud this condemnation of the US presence in Iraq. What they chose to ignore was that it was not just the US. Many politicians in Iraq were echoing what the protesters had been saying for weeks, that Iran also needed to stop interfering in Iraq. Is that part of the message why CodeStink, Margaret Kimberley and so many others elected to ignore the brave protesters who risked death and injury on a daily basis?
At any rate, Iraq's national sovereignty has long been undermined and it goes beyond just the US and Iran to include others -- like Turkey. Nouri al-Maliki was in his first term as prime minister -- that's how long this has been going on -- when he slammed Turkey for bombing northern Iraq. These bombings continue and they have expanded to also include Turkish troops on the ground in Iraq.
AP notes:
Turkish airstrikes targeting members of an outlawed Kurdish rebel group struck a refugee camp in northern Iraq and killed two refugee women, Iraqi authorities said Thursday.
The strikes, which took place Wednesday, were a violation of Iraq's sovereignty, Iraq's Foreign Affairs Ministry said.
The strikes on the Makhmour refugee camp were carried out by a Turkish military drone that was detected by Iraq's air defense, a statement from the ministry said. It expressed "condemnation in the strongest possible terms over these Turkish attacks" and said they also "constituted a serious violation of international humanitarian law."
Two refugee women dead because the government of Turkey thinks they can act as terrorists and bomb northern Iraq. They always insist that they are battling the PKK -- they insist this as they kill and wound civilians.
The PKK is one of many Kurdish groups which supports and fights for a Kurdish homeland. Aaron Hess (International Socialist Review) described them in 2008, "The PKK emerged in 1984 as a major force in response to Turkey's oppression of its Kurdish population. Since the late 1970s, Turkey has waged a relentless war of attrition that has killed tens of thousands of Kurds and driven millions from their homes. The Kurds are the world's largest stateless population -- whose main population concentration straddles Turkey, Iraq, Iran, and Syria -- and have been the victims of imperialist wars and manipulation since the colonial period. While Turkey has granted limited rights to the Kurds in recent years in order to accommodate the European Union, which it seeks to join, even these are now at risk." The Kurdistan Regional Government in Iraq has been a concern to Turkey because they fear that if it ever moves from semi-autonomous to fully independent -- such as if Iraq was to break up into three regions -- then that would encourage the Kurdish population in Turkey. For that reason, Turkey is overly interested in all things Iraq. So much so that they signed an agreement with the US government in 2007 to share intelligence which the Turkish military has been using when launching bomb raids. However, this has not prevented the loss of civilian life in northern Iraq. Aaron Hess noted, "The Turkish establishment sees growing Kurdish power in Iraq as one step down the road to a mass separatist movement of Kurds within Turkey itself, fighting to unify a greater Kurdistan. In late October 2007, Turkey's daily newspaper Hurriyet accused the prime minister of the KRG, Massoud Barzani, of turning the 'Kurdish dream' into a 'Turkish nightmare'."
Bon Iver Releases 'PDLIF,' A New Song To Benefit COVID-19 Relief Efforts
10 silly movies to make you smile
You can't hide the truth
A new album from Diana Ross?
We've been warning you that Ellen DeGeneres was flat out evil
Pretenders and Tori Amos
Fighting Covid-19 – and Repression – in Kashmir
i hope you're happy, you've ruined karen walker day
Howie and the Green Party
As crooks are exposed, where are the apologies?
OTD. Jody Watley. Some Kind of Lover Into The Top 10.
9/11 Truth: Under Lockdown for Nearly Two Decades
Gorilla Radio with Chris Cook, Mordecai Ogada April 16, 2020
Latino Man Is First To Die As Part Of Nation's Largest Coronavirus Cluster
Featured Panelists: April 17, 2020
Apple and Google Announced a Coronavirus Tracking System. How Worried Should We Be?
Opportunity or threat? How Islamic extremists are reacting to coronavirus
Posted by Mikey Likes It! at 10:07 AM
I thought I posted this hours ago but I have it in draft, sorry.
Weird to have a Thursday with no MODERN FAMILY. I started using HULU for FRINGE. I would watch it on HULU the day after when the show first started. A lot of times, I'd just listen to FRINGE because I'd be doing something else. That was good because FRINGE could be especially weird visually the first season. The second season, I'd be watching it and MODERN FAMILY. Every Thursday, I'd have my breakfast while catching up on the night before's MODERN FAMILY.
So the show ended last week and kind of weird to realize that it's gone.
I do wish it had ended after season nine.
I also want to recommend Ava and C.I.'s "TV: Liars" and especially this from it:
For eleven seasons, this rather dull family has been recorded. They've spoken to the camera. The camera has caught their antics. Were they doing a reality show? Was this a documentary? What the hell was going on?
If MODERN FAMILY had even one iota of honesty, the camera would have panned back in the final scene to show film director Christopher Guest recording the family members -- that way the 'creators' of MODERN FAMILY could have finally acknowledged the theft they'd conducted.
Mockumentaries can be funny. Guest has certainly demonstrated that with the films: THIS IS SPINAL TAP, WAITING FOR GUFMAN, BEST IN SHOW, A MIGHTY WIND, FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION and MASCOTS. And the mockumentary format that Guest excelled in can be ripped off in a crude and far less funny manner as the TV series 'creators' Christopher Lloyd and Steven Levitan demonstrated.
Thursday, April 16, 2020. More attacks on Tara Reade from an unholy trinity of women who are not feminists.
In the United States, Tara Reade has stated that Joe Biden assaulted her when he was a US Senator and she was a staffer at his office. She states that she reported it as harassment (which would have been how it was handled in the early 90s at most workplaces) and, for reporting it, she was retaliated against, removed from her position as a supervisor of interns and required to ask permission before leaving for the bathroom. That's sadly also the 90s, the last part. Think of breast feeding and the way both Lynn Redgrave and Cybill Shepherd were treated on the set of their respective shows (Lynn with HOUSECALLS in the 80s, Cybill with MOONLIGHTING in the 90s).
Easter Sunday, THE NEW YORK TIMES published an article -- one that quickly edited when Joe Biden's campaign complained -- that, though we're not supposed to notice, confirms the removal of Tara as a supervisor of interns.
More troubling in recent days than the problematic coverage has been alleged feminists attacking Tara Reade. I said alleged feminist -- I'm not talking about a former child actor who's failed as an adult and become such an ugly human being that Atkins dropped her as their spokesperson due to repeated complaints. I'm talking about women who try to self-present as feminists. There's Michelle Golberg ("F**k you, Michelle Goldberg and the anti-woman pony you rode in on"), there's the original Mud Flap Gal Little Jessie Valenti (Trina was on to those awful 'feminists' that Jessie 'led' years and years ago) and now noted hater of Latinos and Latinas Little Miss Joan Walsh.
Before the latest three, there was Amanda Marcotte who not only published racist drawings but also stole the work of African-American women -- do that and you're a 'respected' voice in the country.
But back to Michelle, Joan and Jessica, all three have attacked Tara Reade which is why Twitter they're called rape apologists and much, much worse.
They've earned all of it.
This unholy trinity has written embarrassing pieces where one woman's story of rape has become an excuse to defend the comfortable silences of the hand maidens to the patriarchy. The three women want to vote for alleged rapist Joe Biden. They want to avoid criticism for doing so, they want to avoid criticism for selling out victims in the process.
So when not attacking Tara in their writing, they focus on who they insist are the real victims of this story: White middle-class women who go through the day oblivious as always.
Ruth Conniff has not attacked Tara. She also hasn't acknowledged Tara's story so let's include her on this. Ruth is Joan, Jessica and Michelle and she proves it with her latest piece of drivel entitled "Democracy Wins in Wisconsin" (COMMON DREAMS). She doesn't address the very real risks of that vote -- in the midst of pandemic. A vote that never should have taken place when it did. No, to Ruth it's just a victory -- a woman won an office, time so sing hosanna, insists Ruth. THE NATION magazine noted that "tens of thousands" were unable to vote in that state due to the coronavirus pandemic and the justified fears that have resulted. But, hey, what's denying tens of thousands the ability to vote -- to Ruth, it's nothing.
Just like the Iraq War was nothing to Ruth Conniff. Remember when she went on KPFA to talk about the world as seen from a gated community? Ruth didn't write about Iraq, she explained, because no one she knew had gone to Iraq.
Oh, Ruth, you're so privileged. And so are Jessica, Michelle and Joan. And that's why they write about what they write about. Insipid columns about the troubles of the middle class White woman as she attempts to embrace the patriarchal structure in place so that she herself -- queen bee -- can rise in the structure.
That's not feminism and it never was.
Hugh Hefner 'feminists' that they are, they will get upset over any restriction on females (in the US only) that might impact sexual activity. Therefore, abortion and birth control are topics they will tackle. Rape isn't one they tackle unless they can use it to try to derail a political opponent. That's why they're mad at Tara -- they don't care about rape but they do worship Joe Biden. That's also why they never wrote about the March 12, 2006 gang-rape and murder of Abeer Qassim Hamza al-Janabi,
A child was raped and murdered. The gang-rape took place while her younger sister and her parents were killed in the next room and, yes, she could hear them being killed. US soldiers took turns gang-raping Abeer. Steven D. Green went last because he was in the other room killing her parents and sister. Steven then killed Abeer. The US soldiers then worked overtime to make it look as though a terrorist had killed the family. And they set Abeer's body on fire.
Steven D. Green went to prison. The others got a lighter sentence because they ratted him out after a whistle-blower US soldier turned them in. Please note that Green and the other soldiers actions resulted in the deaths of US soldiers who were not involved in any way in that crime. Iraqis retaliated for this crime and they just went after a group of US soldiers. That's when the whistle-blower came forward.
Grasp also that, tattle tales on Green or not, everyone of them should have been imprisoned for decades. Green didn't surprise them with the crimes. They plotted it out ahead of time at length. They plotted to rape a young girl. They plotted to go off base. They knew they would take turns raping her. They knew there could be no witnesses. They knew they would kill her and any other family member in that house.
This was premeditated rape and murder.
And because they tattled on Green, they didn't have to spend the years in prison that they should have. There is no excuse for what they did. And yet they lurk in the shadows here in the US, (Paul Cortez, James Barker, Jesse Spielman and Bryan Howard, these murders and rapists.
This was not US soldiers in Iraq at a checkpoint killing someone who approached because they wrongly thought the person was a terrorist or suicide bomber. This wasn't the fog of war. This was Green studying Abeer for weeks and plotting with his buddies to leave base at night, break into her home, gang rape her and kill her and anyone who could be a witness.
Paul Cortez, James Barker, Jesse Spielman and Bryan Howard are supreme criminals. They should not be walking in the United States. The country is not safer with them on the loose.
Women were the ones who broke this story. From the July 3, 2006 "Iraq snapshot:"
Developments in the Mahmoudiya incident where four Iraqi civilians died, allegedly at the hands of the US forces, in March continue including the age of one of the alleged victims and the arrest of a US soldier. To recap, one of the four was allegedly raped
and this morning Ellen Knickmeyer (Washington Post) broke the news that the town felt the "woman" was a fifteen-year-old girl who had complained about the 'interest' some US forces had in her. Sandra Lupien noted on today on KPFA's The Morning Show, the military had put the age of the female at 20 years-old when they announced their investigation last week (Friday). Reuters reports that the mayor of Mahmudiya declared today that the woman "was no more than 16 years old when she was killed along with her parents and young sister". Lupien also noted the arrest of Steven D. Green. Green, is 21 and was with the 101st Airborne Division of the US Army. Friday, in Asheville, North Carolina, he was arrested and charged with both the four deaths as well as the rape. According to the US government press release, if convicted on the charge of murder, "the maximum statutory penalty . . . is death" while, if convicted on the charge of rape, "the maxmium statutory penalty for the rape is life in prison."
We covered it the day the news broke -- July 3, 2006. We covered it through the US military trial and through the trial in Kentucky. We covered it when War Criminal Steven D. Green took his own life while in prison.
Rape is an issue feminists have always covered. The powerful have always thought they could get away with rape. They thought they could get away with shaming and attacking the women who were raped. And there was a time when they could, when they could put the victim on trial and not her attacker.
There was a time?
There clearly still is as Jessica, Michelle and Joan make clear.
It's as though Susan Brownmiller's AGAINST OUR WILL (1975) was never published -- or Marilyn French's THE WAR AGAINST WOMEN (1992), or Susan Faludi's BACKLASH: THE UNDECLARED WAR AGAINST WOMEN (1991), or Shulamith Firestone's THE DIALETIC OF SEX: THE CASE FOR A FEMINIST REVOLUTION (1970), or Alice Walker's THE COLOR PURPLE (1982) or POSSESSING THE SECRET OF JOY (1992) (or really anything of Alice's work which is all rooted strongly in the world we actually live in), or Robin Morgan's THE DEMON LOVER: ON THE SEXUALITY OF TERRORISM (1989) or . . .
What Jessica, Michelle and Joan are doing is taking a big eraser to the blackboard and erasing all the work that feminists have done for decades, for centuries to ensure that a space existed for a woman to tell her story.
And they're doing not to benefit women, but to benefit a man named Joe Biden, a man who is clearly a war monger, a man who has done nothing for women (tell me how The Violence For Women Act actually improved women's lives because, as WSWS' David Walsh notes, it didn't).
The unholy whores want you to know that Joe Biden is innocent and their vagina's apparently told them that in some sort of Vagina Whisper. See, Joe is pro-woman, so Joe could not do anything wrong to women.
That sounds so familiar . . . why is that? Oh, yes. Bob Packwood.
Yes, it is a lot like that.
When Abeer was gang-raped and murdered, 'feminists' like Jessica, Joan and Michelle had other things to do. Couldn't cover it when Ellen reported it, couldn't cover it during the military procedures, couldn't cover the civilian court procedures in Kentucky.
The gals had other things to do. Jessica, for example, was busy during that time leading the trashing of MS. MAGAZINE and Jane Fonda -- little Jessie and her cohorts didn't like the cover photo -- they couldn't review the article because they hadn't read it -- it was literally judging a book by its cover.
Now Jane could and did speak out about Abeer.
Maybe that's another reason Baby Jessica trashed Jane?
But what we see is a pattern where a bunch of privileged women only cover the issues that effect them directly. In their minds, life is a gated community.
They are not feminists, they are not aware enough to be feminists.
They are tools of the patriarchy, used to harm other women, used to protect powerful men.
They're upset right now because -- let's be honest -- not one of them can write worth s**t. I'm not talking their viewpoints, I'm talking basic writing. They've got their jobs because they're women -- that's the only reason. And to keep their jobs they need to keep the pretense that they're feminists out there because they are employed to control the thoughts of other women, to keep them in line. If they can't do that, they can't justify a pay check.
Again, they are not writers. They have never written a single sentence that anyone was impressed with.
So they attack Tara. And they think we don't know why.
Worse, they think we're as ignorant with regards to feminist history and theory that we're not aware of (a) what they're doing and (b) that they are not feminists.
Marie Solis has an important piece at VICE.
Celebrate Public Radio Music Day
AOC speaks out but Tulsi's silent
bullying won't change the way we vote, grasp that
They wanted a rapist on the ticket, that's on them
It's always one betrayal after another
The destruction of EMPIRE -- thanks Jussie and Taraji
I hate Joan Walsh too and I'm not the only rape survivor who does
If Coronavirus Overwhelms Gaza, Israel Alone Is to Blame
Where's Senator Gillibrand?
Joan Walsh is disgusting
Public health document is 'an insult to the lives of frontline workers'
David Walsh schools former child actor Alyssa Milano
David Walsh has earned high praise for what may be the year's best writing
Trump Cuts Funding to the World Health Organization amid Pandemic
IMF Forecasts Unprecedented Economic Contraction In Latin America And The Caribbean
GI Rights Hotline - News Archive
14 April Update to Military Travel Ban
Gorilla Radio with Chris Cook, Kathy Kelly April 14, 2020
Isolation, Before and During a Pandemic
Wellness. Daily Habits.
Awful Bernie, brave AOC and Krystal Ball
Boo Alyssa! Yea Rose!