Before I built React FAQ, I went looking for a static site generator.
I had a few criteria in mind.
Gatsby at the time was still pre-1.0 but its workflow met my needs. I loved that I could drop my existing Markdown files into a pages directory and Gatsby would do the rest.
Webpack loader —> React.js wrapper component —> static HTML page. Done.
Well…done until I read this GitHub Issue … "New GraphQL data layer".
Things in Gatsby were about to change. I read on to see how easy it'd be to upgrade.
Having never used GraphQL, the new "routeQuery" in components looked very foreign.
What happened to my "drop files into a folder and call it a day" setup? What is all this weird syntax @kylemathews?
Reading the issue, Kyle's reasoning made sense but this didn't seem to be simple at all. 0.x seemed more "automatic" to me. Drop in your files and go.
When 1.0 landed, I waited for a while before trying to update my website. The reviews were solid but I was still stuck on my pre-1.0 mindset.
.@gatsbyjs is a completely original approach to web development. The mix of static/dynamic and how it handles data is really interesting.
Well, that sounded like a pretty good endorsement.
With the gatsby-starter-blog in hand as a solid example, I started converting my website over to v1.0.
There were a few bumps into the road but thanks to the starter example, I pieced things together quickly. Quickly as in "I have no idea how this GraphQL stuff works, but I have it working, so cool". Easy to update — check.
I'm not the type of person to settle on "It's working so don't touch anything". So I started digging into how Gatsby 1.x works—particular the data layer.
Things really clicked when I read this part about the GraphiQL IDE and watched how to drill down on the data.
Prior to reading / seeing that part in the documentation, looking at the code I could understand roughly what was going on but it didn't feel familiar. Like anything new, there's that "I don't know what I'm doing" stage. I know what I want to do, but I don't understand the syntax enough to make it happen. Seeing the docs and how you can explore the schema in GraphiQL (autocomplete is 👌) to see what data is available really helped in my "play around and break stuff" phase.
You first sketch out the data query by playing in GraphiQL, then copy this to a React page component to start building the UI.
"Sketch & Copy" using the GraphiQL was a revelation. I was thinking it's going to be tricky to manually write the queries until I become more familiar with the syntax. Using GraphiQL helped me make a quick leap forward with the learning curve. "Aha this is amazing". I have lots to learn still but the comfort level is going up.
With my 1.x update complete, I'm feeling that not only was GatsbyJS a solid pick, but it's something that is going to evolve the way I build websites. It's a nice starter push into GraphQL and many other advanced features the websites of the future will need to be performant.
Sometimes we don't do things because they are unfamiliar to us. Sometimes we need a little push. Thanks for the push GatsbyJS. The learning curve may seem daunting but the payoff is huge. GatsbyJS has become a powerful tool in my arsenal and I'm happy to have extended my development skills.