The present study aims to determine the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and to evaluate the relation between two diagnostic criteria of the metabolic syndrome. The present cross-sectional study was conducted on 275 postmenopausal women living in the urban areas of Ludhiana District, Punjab. Waist Circumference, hip circumference, body weight, height and blood pressure were measured from each participant. The venous blood samples were also taken from each woman for measuring lipid profile and fasting blood glucose level. The subjects were classified as having metabolic syndrome (MetS) or not by using the criteria of World Health Organization (WHO) and International Diabetes Federation (IDF). According to WHO and IDF criteria, the total prevalence of metabolic syndrome among the females of the present study was 30.91% and 90.55% respectively. Hypertension was observed to be the most common component of the syndrome according to WHO while high density lipoprotein was the rarest found component of the syndrome based on both criteria of the syndrome. Poor relation was found between IDF and WHO criteria of the metabolic syndrome. It can be concluded that the postmenopausal status is associated with an increased risk of metabolic syndrome. The poor relation between the two different metabolic syndrome guidelines indicated that they did not agree with each other.
syndrome. The present cross-sectional study was disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and all cause mortality.
according to WHO while high density lipoprotein especially in India using different definitions [6-12].
older). Prevalence of prediabetes or Metabolic blood pressure (≥130/85 mmHg).
adults have metabolic syndrome .
Poor relation was found between IDF and WHO criteria syndrome.
of central obesity for IDF whereas WHO criteria put more Syndrome. Cardiology Research and Practice.
focus on insulin resistance. Some studies reported that 2014; 2014: 94316.
studies can be due to different investigation criteria, 1999-2006. Diabetes Care, 34(1): 216-219.
socioeconomic, genetic and environmental differences.
by genetic makeup of individual, predominance of Research and Practice.
contemporary world and all efforts should be made to adults. Lipids in Health and Disease, 10(79): 17.
create local awareness, early diagnosis and prevention.
balance energy intake and expenditure in order to 1-13.
reduce the alarming rate of the syndrome incidence.
8. Marjani, A., Hezarkhani, S., Shahini,N. 2012.
Journal of Medical Sciences, 7(1):17-22. metabolic syndrome in Mumbai City, india.
JObe Metab Res 2016; 3:16-22.
629. Sci 2016; 4: 398-402.
South West of Iran. Journal of Diabetes and Asia J Public Health 2016; 5(1): 62–69.
metabolic syndrome in Tunisian women.
and rural difference in the prevalence of Medicine. 1998; 15(7):539-553.
Northwestern China: a population based survey.
BMC Public Health, 14: 104.
S. 2013. Body composition and Metabolic risk 23(5):469–480.
22. Lohman TG, Roche AF and Martorell ER.
Manual. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL 1988.
observer agreement for categorical data.
Public Health 2016; 5(1): 35-39.
24. Thakur S, Raina S, Thakur S, Negi PC, Verma BS.
Physicians India. 2016; 64: 20-5.
urbanized union territory of North India.