Home > Journals > Ardea > Volume 97 > Issue 4 > Article
1 December 2009 Barn Owl Tyto alba Prey in Thessaly, and Evaluation of Barn Owl Diets Throughout Greece
Vasileios A. Bontzorlos, Salvador J. Peris, Cristos G. Vlachos, Dimitrios E. Bakaloudis
Vasileios A. Bontzorlos,1,* Salvador J. Peris,1 Cristos G. Vlachos,2 Dimitrios E. Bakaloudis3
11Department of Animal Biology-Zoology, University of Salamanca, 37071, Salamanca, Spain
22Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Department of Forestry and Natural Environment, Laboratory of
33TEl of Kavala, Department of Forestry & Management of Natural Environment, 661 00, Drama, Greece
*corresponding author (vasilibon@gmail.com)
Ardea, 97(4):625-630 (2009). https://doi.org/10.5253/078.097.0431
Barn Owl diet in Thessaly, central Greece (2003–05)
A review of Barn Owl diet throughout Greece
Price: $10.00 ADD TO CART
Diet composition of the Barn Owl Tyto alba was studied in agricultural landscapes in Thessaly, Greece, for 3 years (2003–05). A total of 852 Rattus spp. individuals were identified from 10 065 pellets, which accounted for 2.9% by frequency and 27.4% by biomass of 29 061 prey items. Rattus spp. were more numerous in Barn Owl pellets during winter months than in summer. We suggest that this difference was due to a shift in relative prey availability and an increased need for energy by the Barn Owl during the colder months. Comparisons between Thessaly and 15 other areas showed differences in prey availability between islands and mainland Greece. Microtus spp. were absent from all island diets except one, and some islands had greater species richness.
The diet of the cosmopolitan Barn Owl Tyto alba has been well documented because its pellets are easily found, preserved, and analysed (Taylor 1994, Shawyer 1998). While many diet studies have identified seasonal fluctuations in prey frequency (Burton 1984, Taylor 1994), prey biomass also needs to be estimated because it often reveals different patterns of prey use. We conducted a 3-year (2003–05) Barn Owl diet study in Thessaly, central Greece to examine seasonal variation in prey use. The results are compared to published data on Barn Owl diet throughout Greece.
Owl pellets were collected from 31 sites in the lowlands (0 to 300 m a.s.l.) comprising 36% of the Thessaly region (5053 km2; Fig. 1) on four occasions at 6 month intervals (April–September and October-March). Pellets were dissected by the 'dry' method (Marti 1987, Yalden 2003) and prey were identified using reference books (Toschi & Lanza 1959, Toschi 1965, Chaline et al. 1974, Lawrence & Brown 1974, Niethammer & Krapp 1977, 1982, 1983). Prey were assigned to five mammal groups: Crocidura spp., Microtus spp., Apodemus spp., Rattus spp. and Mus spp. A small number of Rattus specimens (n = 129) remained unidentified due to cranial damage. Total species biomass in the sample was calculated by multiplying the estimated species-specific biomass by the number of individuals identified from the pellet sample (Perrins 1987, Macdonald & Barret 1993, Chinery 1993). When an adult or sub-adult prey item was identified it was assigned an appropriate biomass estimate, but when a prey's age was not clear, a mean biomass was used.
A meta-analysis was done on all available Barn Owl diet studies in Greece. These included studies from various islands (Böhr 1962, Pieper 1977, Niethammer 1989, Angelici et al. 1992), from continental Greece (Tsounis & Dimitropoulos 1992, Alivizatos & Goutner 1999, Vohralik & Sofianidou 2000, Goutner & Alivizatos 2003, Alivizatos et al. 2006) and those that compared the owl's diet between island and mainland Greece (Cheylan 1976, Alivizatos et al. 2005). The following trophic niche parameters were calculated. Species richness is the number of species in a community or in a sample. Diversity was calculated as
where pi is the proportion of species i in the entire sample, In is the natural logarithm, and s is the number of species. Evenness was calculated as
where the numerator H' is the diversity calculated as above and the denominator is the maximum value of H' when all species occur in similar proportions. To avoid bias in the calculation of the above indices due to different pellet sampling effort, the rarefaction method (Sanders 1968, Krebs 1999) was applied to all sites that were included in the present study, with the Software programs Ecosim 7.0 (Gotelli & Entsminger 2001) and Biodiversity Pro version 2.0 (McAleece et al. 1997). Since no available software could calculate evenness after rarefying data, evenness was calculated without prior rarefaction.
Pellet collection sites in Thessaly, central Greece, where Rattus species were present in the Barn Owl diet (2003–05).
A total of 29 061 prey were identified from 10 065 pellets. Rattus specimens (n = 852) represented 2.93% by frequency and 27.37% by biomass of the sample as follows: Black Rat Rattus rattus 0.77% and 4.46%, Brown Rat Rattus norvegicus 1.72% and 19.15%, and unidentified Rattus sp. 0.44% and 3.76% (by frequency and biomass, respectively). Rattus species were present in 25 of the 31 sites sampled and were found significantly more often (by frequency and biomass) during winter periods (Figs. 1, 2A,B; χ2 = 21.2, df = 3, P < 0.0005 and χ2 = 7425.6, df = 3, P < 0.0005, respectively). While the frequency of non-rat prey items was similar across seasons (Fig. 2A; χ2 = 0.04, df = 3, P = 0.998), the estimated biomass of non-rat items was significantly reduced during winter seasons (Fig. 2B; χ2 = 546.2, df = 3, P < 0.0005).
Information on Barn Owl diet in 12 geographic regions in Greece was reviewed as summarized in Table 1, including 6 islands and 6 mainland areas (Fig. 3). Mammals dominated in the owl's diet both in frequency (73.58–99.78%) and biomass (85.64–90.25%) (Table 1, Figs 3, 4A,B). Mammals were mainly composed of rodents, but exceptions were Crete and Mitrikou Lake, where insectivores formed 88.24% and 44.92% of the owl's diet in numbers, and 58.37% and 24.49% in biomass (Figs 4A,B).
Percentage occurrence of mammal prey groups in the diet of Barn Owl in Thessaly, central Greece. A) By frequency, and B) by biomass.
The ratio of rodent to insectivore prey was > 1 in most sites, and ratios generally ranged between 2 and 6, except at Crete and Mitrikou Lake. The highest ratio (77) was found for the island of Antikythera where very few insectivores were eaten. Birds were captured in small percentages in all sites except Mitrikou Lake and the islands of Antikythera and Kos where they formed more than 10% of the diet (Fig. 4A). On the island of Kerkira 17 different species were identified (1.97% by frequency, Fig. 4A), and on the island of Kos, 14 species of birds reflected 21.23% of all prey taken (Fig. 4A).
From the 6 mammal genera which form the Barn Owl diet in Greece (Figs 5 A,B), only Mus was preyed upon at all sites. Crocidura was captured in important numbers in various cases but contributed minimally to the biomass. On Crete, however, the relatively few numbers of Rattus represented a higher proportionate biomass. Rattus was the main biomass source for owls in Greek islands, and Microtus on the mainland.
Geographical regions of Greece, where the Barn Owl diet has been studied. 1 Kerkira, 2 Crete, 3 Evoia, 4 Kos, 5 Astipalaia, 6 Antikythera, 7 Evros Delta, 8 Lakes of Mitrikou, Porto Lagos & Lafres, 9 Parthenio, 10 Potidea, 11 Attica, 12 Thessaly.
Percentage occurrence of mammal orders and other taxa in the Barn Owl diet in Greek study sites. A) By frequency, and B) by biomass.
Geographical regions in Greece where the Barn Owl diet has been studied, year of study, prey percentages, niche values and indexes.
Barn Owl diet composition was more diverse in the region of Thessaly than it was on the islands and in the rest of continental Greece (ANOVA, F2,41 = 8.43, P < 0.001), but the diet was not more evenly distributed (F2,41 = 2.84, P = 0.07). The owl diet in the region of Thessaly presented a higher prey species richness in comparison to island and other continental Barn Owl diets (F2,41 = 19.10, P < 0.001). Similarly, differences occurred in proportions of mammalian prey biomass in islands, mainland Greece and the Thessaly region (F2,41 = 3.87, P = 0.028).
The diet of Barn Owl was composed of prey from a large variety of taxa, including bats Chiroptera, lagomorphs, dormice Gliridae and mustelids, insects, reptiles, and birds. Nonetheless, the owl's diet was dominated by mammalian species, especially rodents. Five main mammal genera (Crocidura, Microtus, Apodemus, Rattus and Mus) formed the bulk of the Barn Owl's diet. Even in cases where insectivore species were captured at a high rate (Crete island, Mitrikou Lake, Evros Delta & Kos island), they offered a relatively limited amount of biomass. The dominance of insectivores in Crete might be related to the absence of Microtus species (Pieper 1990, Reumer 1986) which are replaced by the endemic Cretan White-toothed Shrew Crocidura zimmermanni, and the common Lesser White-toothed Shrew Crocidura suaveolens.
We can only speculate which factors influenced Barn Owl prey availability and use. The larger proportion in the diet of Brown Rats compared to Black Rats might be explained by differences in relative abundance and interspecific aggression, i.e. Brown Rats are dominant over the Black Rat wherever their ranges overlap (Grizmek 1975, Medway 1978, Handley 1980). Another possibility may be the Black Rat's limited breeding season (March–November) compared to the Brown Rat, which reproduces all year (MacDonald & Barret 1993, Jabir et al. 1985). Also, dispersing young Brown Rats are easy prey for the Barn Owl (Taylor 1994).
Changes in vegetation cover and prey vulnerability may explain why more Rattus was present in the Barn Owl diet during winter months, while the opposite was true for Microtus, which are reportedly optimal prey for the Barn Owl (Shawyer 1998, Marks & Marti 1984). In Thessaly, cereal crops are harvested in June and cotton is harvested in October, with reseeding beginning in January and April, respectively. Therefore, during winter, the Barn Owl can forage over fallow land, which likely increases its hunting success for larger prey such as rats.
Percentage occurrence of mammal genera in the Barn Owl diet in Greek study sites. A) By frequency, and B) by biomass.
The optimal prey for the Barn Owl in most parts of its wide distribution are Microtus species (Mikkola 1983, Taylor 1994, Shawyer 1998). In Greece, voles are present only in mainland areas, and when present they dominate the owl's diet in terms of numbers and biomass. Exceptions to this rule are Potidea, Attica and Mitrikou, where Mus, Apodemus and Crocidura, dominate the diet in terms of biomass. Voles are completely absent from all Greek islands, except Evoia, which is connected to the mainland with a bridge. The absence of voles from Greek islands corresponds to a predominance of rats in all Greek islands except Crete, where Crocidura species are the dominant prey.
Although the Barn Owl diet in Greek islands includes many bird species (e.g. Kerkira & Kos) and other types of prey, it is significantly less diverse with lower evenness than on mainland Greece. The Greek region with the highest diversity, evenness and species richness is Thessaly (Bontzorlos et al. 2005, 2007a,b).
In interpreting our results, it is important to consider the amount of energy spent on hunting relative to energy obtained, especially during winter when Barn Owls need more energy for thermoregulation. During the study winters, Barn Owls captured 5985 and 6744 non-rat prey which reflected 55% and 60% of each winters' total biomass, respectively. The much lower number of Rattus prey caught in these winters (389 and 279, respectively) represented no less than 40% and 35% of the winters' total biomass. It thus seems that little effort was invested to catch Rattus, which, in turn, covered a high percentage of the owls' energy needs. Year-round studies on Barn Owl predation (species-specific), capture success rates, seasonal energetics, and prey use vs. availability are needed to further examine these results.
H. Alivizatos & V. Goutner 1999. Winter diet of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) and Long-eared Owl (Asio otus) in northeastern Greece: A comparison. J. Raptor Res. 33: 160–163. Google Scholar
H. Alivizatos , V. Goutner & S. Zogaris 2005. Contribution to the study of the diet of four owl species (Aves, Strigiformes) from mainland and island areas of Greece. Belg. J. Zool. 134: 1–10. Google Scholar
H. Alivizatos , V. Goutner , A. Athanasiadis & K. Poirazidis 2006. Comparative temporal prey use by Barn Owl (Tyto alba) and Little Owl (Athene noctua) in the Evros Delta, northeastern Greece. J. Biol. Res. 6: 177–186. Google Scholar
F.M. Angelici , F. Pinchera & F. Riga 1992. First records of Crocidura spp. and Mus domesticus and notes on the mammals of Astipalaia Island (Dodecanese, Greece). Mammalia 56: 159–161. Google Scholar
H.J. Böhr 1962. Zur kenntis der Vogelwelt von Korfu. Bonner Zool. Beiträge 13: 50–114. Google Scholar
V. Bontzorlos , A.S.J. Peris , C. Vlachos & D. Bakaloudis 2005. The diet of Barn Owl in the agricultural landscapes of central Greece. Folia Zool. 54: 99–110. Google Scholar
V.A. Bontzorlos , S.J. Peris , D.E. Bakaloudis & C.G. Vlachos 2007a. Is the Pygmy White-toothed Shrew (Suncus etruscus) a common and abundant species in central Greece? Hystrix It. J. Mamm., Suppl.: 193. Google Scholar
V.A. Bontzorlos , S.J. Peris , D.E. Bakaloudis & C.G. Vlachos 2007b. High Brown and Black rat (Rattus norvegicus & Rattus rattus) biomass contribution in the Barn Owl diet during non breeding seasons in central Greece, Thessaly. Hystrix It. J. Mamm., Suppl.: 66. Google Scholar
J.A. Burton (ed.) 1984. Owls of the World: Their Evolution, Structure and Ecology. Second edition. Tanager Books, Dover, NH. Google Scholar
J. Chaline , H. Baudvin , D. Jammot & M.C. Saint-Girons (eds) 1974. Les proies des rapaces. Petits mammiferes et leur environnement. Doin, Paris. Google Scholar
G. Cheylan 1976. La regime alimentaire de la Chouette Effraie (Tyto alba) en Europe Mediterraneene. Terre Vie (Revue Ecol.) 4: 565–579. Google Scholar
M. Chinery (ed.) 1993. Field guide to insects of Britain and Europe. Harper Collins. Google Scholar
N.J. Gotelli & G.L. Entsminger 2001. EcoSim: Null models software for ecology. Version 7.0. Acquired Intelligence Inc. & Kesey-Bear. Available at: http://homepages.together.net/∼gentsmin/ecosim.htm. Google Scholar
V. Goutner & H. Alivizatos 2003. Diet of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) and Little Owl (Athene noctua) in the wetlands of northeastern Greece. Belg. J. Zool. 133: 15–22. Google Scholar
B. Grzimek 1975. Grzimek's animal life encyclopedia: mammals, I–IV. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. Google Scholar
C.O. Handley 1980. Mammals In: D.W. Linzey (ed.) Endangered and threatened plants and animals of Virginia. Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg, pp. 483–621. Google Scholar
H.A. Jabir , D. Bajomi & A. Demeter 1985. New record of the Black Rat (Rattus rattus) from Hungary, and a review of its distribution in central Europe (Mammalia). Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici 77: 263–267. Google Scholar
C. Krebs 1999. Ecological methodology. Addison Wesley Educational Publishers. Google Scholar
M.J. Lawrence & R.W. Brown 1974. Mammals of Britain. Their tracks, trails and signs. Blandford Press, Dorset. Google Scholar
J.S. Marks & C.D. Marti 1984. Feeding ecology of sympatric Barn Owls and Long-eared Owls in Idaho. Ornis Scand. 15: 135–143. Google Scholar
C.D. Marti 1987. Raptor food habit studies. In: B.A. Pendleton , B.A. Millsap , K.W. Cleine & D.M. Bird (eds) Raptor management techniques manual. Natl. Wildl. Federation Sci. Tech. Rep. 10. Washington, DC, pp. 67–69. Google Scholar
N. McAleece , P.J.D. Lambshead & G.L.J. Paterson 1997. Biodiversity Pro, Version 2.0. Oban, Scotland. Available at: http://www.sams.ac.uk/ Google Scholar
D.W. McDonald & P. Barrett 1993. Mammals of Europe. Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
L. Medway 1978. The wild mammals of Malaya (peninsular Malaysia) and Singapore. Oxford Univ. Press, Kuala Lumpur. Google Scholar
H. Mikkola 1983. Owls of Europe. T. & A.D. Poyser, Carlton. Google Scholar
J. Niethammer & F. Krapp 1977. Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas ' Band 1, Nagetiere 1. Aula, Wiesbaden. Google Scholar
J. Niethammer & F. Krapp 1982. Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas — Band 2/1, Nagetiere 2. Aula, Wiesbaden. Google Scholar
J. Niethammer & F. Krapp 1983. Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas — Band 3/1, Insektenfresser. Aula, Wiesbaden. Google Scholar
J. Niethammer 1989. Gewöllinhalte der Schleiereule (Tyto alba) von Kos und aus Südwestanatolien. Bonner Zoologische Beiträge 40: 1–9. Google Scholar
C. Perrins 1987. Collins New Generation Guide: The Birds of Britain & Europe. Collins. Google Scholar
H. Pieper 1977. Fledermäuse aus Schleiereulen-Gewöllen von der Insel Kreta. Zeitschrift Säugetierkunde 42: 7–12. Google Scholar
H. Pieper 1990. Crocidura zimmermani In: J. Niethammer & F. Krapp (eds) Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas, Band 3/1, Insectivora, Primates, Aula, Wiesbaden, pp. 453–460. Google Scholar
J.W.F. Reumer 1986. Notes on the Soricidae (Mammalia, Insectivora), from Crete. I. The Pleistocene species Crocidura zimmermanni. Bonner Zool. Beiträge 37: 161–171. Google Scholar
H.L. Sanders 1968. Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study. Am. Nat. 102: 243–282. Google Scholar
C.R. Shawyer 1998. Barn Owl. Arlequin Publications. Google Scholar
I.R. Taylor 1994. Barn owls. Predator — prey relationships and conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Google Scholar
A. Toschi & B. Lanza 1959. Mammalia. Generalita, Insectivora, Chiroptera. Edizioni Calderini, Bologna. Google Scholar
A. Toschi 1965. Mammalia. Lagomorpha, Rodentia, Carnivora, Artiodactyla, Cetacea. Edizioni Calderini Bologna. Google Scholar
Gr. Tsounis & A. Dimitropoulos 1992. Seasonal variation of the feeding of Barn Owl, Tyto alba in mount Hymetus, Attica, Greece. Biologia Gallo Hellenica 19: 29–36. Google Scholar
V. Vohralik & T. Sofianidou 2000. New records of Suncus etruscus (Mammalia: Insectivora) in Bulgaria and Greece and distribution of the species in the Balkans. Lynx n.s. (Praha) 31: 143–148. Google Scholar
D. Yalden 2003. The analysis of owl pellets. Mammal Society, London. Google Scholar
Gedurende de jaren 2003–05 werd de samenstelling van het voedsel van de Kerkuil Tyto alba onderzocht in het cultuurlandschap van Thessalië, Griekenland. Er werden 852 ratten Rattus spp. geïdentificeerd in 10 065 braakballen, wat 2,9% naar frequentie en 27,4% naar biomassa van de 29 061 prooidieren betekende. Ratten waren in de winter talrijker in de braakballen aanwezig dan in de zomer. We veronderstellen dat dit verschil een gevolg is geweest van een verschuiving in het voedselaanbod en een hogere energiebehoefte gedurende het koudste deel van het jaar. Door de braakbalsamenstelling uit 16 onderzoeksgebieden verspreid over Griekenland naast elkaar te zetten kwamen opmerkelijke regionale verschillen naar voren in voorkomen van kleine zoogdieren. Zo werden woelmuizen Microtus veel aangetroffen in braakballen op het vasteland, maar ontbraken vrijwel volledig op de eilanden. Daarnaast lieten sommige eilanden een opmerkelijke soortendiversiteit in het voedsel zien.
Vasileios A. Bontzorlos, Salvador J. Peris, Cristos G. Vlachos, and Dimitrios E. Bakaloudis "Barn Owl Tyto alba Prey in Thessaly, and Evaluation of Barn Owl Diets Throughout Greece," Ardea 97(4), 625-630, (1 December 2009). https://doi.org/10.5253/078.097.0431
DOWNLOAD PAPER + SAVE TO MY LIBRARY
Vasileios A. Bontzorlos, Salvador J. Peris, Cristos G. Vlachos, Dimitrios E. Bakaloudis "Barn Owl Tyto alba Prey in Thessaly, and Evaluation of Barn Owl Diets Throughout Greece," Ardea, 97(4), 625-630, (1 December 2009)