messages
listlengths 3
3
|
|---|
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "This computer system is something that could change alot of things including how students and other people feel about their emotions. This could change the lives of a lot of people and a lot of people could use it like poice officers or somebody in the FBI to figure out an investigation or even a doctor could use it to see if somebody is really in the mood they seem to tell the doctor they are in. This type of coding in a computer could be good for people who are making ads for the people that are browsing the internet and they could be posting ads that people would look at while they are in a bad mood or a good mood. This Facial Action Coding System is gonna be very useful for analyzing paintings like the Mona Lisa painting by showing the expression of face it has on it. By looking at the expression of face on the Mona Lisa painting, we could see what mood the painter was in at the time of the painting and by the story it looks like he put a bunch of effort and detail into that painting, almost like he wanted to use it for this new software. I think that using this on students in a classroom would be very rewarding for the students because the teacher could use it to tell if the students are bored and then the teacher could change up the lesson and make the students follow along more. Yes I do think this is a very valuable software towards students and teachers in a classroom. This could be the future of teaching, the teachers would stop having boring lessons, and the students would be more productive and they would listen so much better to the lesson the teacher is teaching. This is where basically the software is determined to be valuable or not valuable. I think the software would be an excellent thing to have and start it off in all schools, they could use it when visitors buzz in, they could use it to analyze their faces and it would let the staff know if the visitor was nervous, mad, or happy. This would be excellent for schools and then it could be spread around to other places, like the local police station and other places like that. This is a very valuable piece of work, or software and it would be great to use on students in a classroom.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Although, abound individuals believe that institute are responsible for teaching children to be better citizens and workers rather than developing themselves. this essay will highlight that this certainly is a rational approach that needs to be opted and thus will lead to a logical conclusion. To start with, there are myriad reasons which will further explain this arguments, but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that preparing an individual for a particular future work at an early age extremely imperative. Because, it would help him to earn a decent living. It would mean that institution teachers always discipline to kids, which always turn children into effective workers. Moreover, another pivotal aspect of this argument is that juniors go to the institute and they learn lots of new skills as well as observe the knowledge. this is to express, the leaner daily meet new students in academy time. So, easily learn new things. For example, In university life children are learning what is right and wrong for themselves and academy instills the cultural value that are shared the society. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead. Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits, but one of the crucial effect is that students are able to choose the subjects that best suit them. Therefore, academy education, children able to develop an understanding about the world in which they live. For instance, the tutors are trained to help children understand their strengths and improve their weaknesses. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of this trend. In the nutshell, according to the argument aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of study in university because, always provide positive things as well as teachers teach to the students about their rights are indeed.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The author concludes story paragraph Saeng saying made promise give getting license hibiscus makes feel like home In text mother says CAPS seen kind blooming along lake Its flowers arent pretty strong enough make cold months winter hibiscus Thats matters says makes Saeng sad knows hibiscus remind hibiscus home gives power want try spring",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Electoral College , whats so great about it? Why should we keep it, whats the point? their are so many things wrong with electoral college that their is really no point in keeping it. according to the passage I read \"Does the Electoral Work? in source 2: The Indefensible Electoral College:Why even the best-laid defenses of the system are wrong by:Brad Plumer\" you have to vote on a elector that might not even vote for the candidate you want over 60% of voters would prefer a direct vote anyway so... why don't we just do it, with the way we do it now with electoral college mistakes are being made. then we have this winner takes all crap witch is completely unfair too voters. You have to vote on a elector that might not even vote for the candidate you want...its almost like you're not even voting whats the point in voting if your elector might not even elect your candidate and half the time when you do get to tell them they don't listen and take advantage of their power. mistakes are being made with this way of election half the time voters cant even control who their electors vote for and sometimes voters get confused about the electors and vote for the wrong candidate... electoral college is too confusing it needs to change. the electoral college is also unfair due too the winner takes all system in each state. This winner takes all system that we have in each state is horrible completely unfair to the voters why should we even try if we know we cant win? sure yea that's how we have done it for a long time and i know some people are scared of change but change isn't always necessarily a bad thing. Just to wrap things up here you have it this is my opinion on electoral college i think it should change imagine how mush better the process would be 60% of us want this anyway... its time for a change.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The builders Empire State Building faced many problems attempting allow dirigibles dock One main reason illegal dirigibles dock Empire State Building existing law airships flying low urban areas Also mother nature prevented dirigibles ability dock The winds top building constantly shifting due violent air currents However dirigibles attempted dock In US Navy Los Angeles tried dock due severe winds could New York densely populated area explosive hydrogen floating low city could cause huge threat When German dirigible Hindenburg destroyed fire Lakehurst New Jersey This showed builders owners Empire State Building dangerous dirigibles trying dock A main set problems builders faced making building strong enough allow dirigibles dock The builders modify frame Empire State Building design custom mooring device The builders faced legal safety problems attempting allow dirigibles dock Empire State Building",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Regargless of whether this should or should not be used to read the emotional expressions of students, this technology is very advanced. It is so impresive that computers are being evovled to understand us even more. When it comes to students, im sure many of us get distracted or bored very easily when it domes to school work. Having this tecnology in our computers could help us complete school with out having to worry about not understanding wht going on or how to do things or even if you just don't care. This tecnology can help students all over in many different ways. A simple senario, a student is at home doing school work. The student doesn't understand the lesson and therfor can not complete the work simply because they do not know how. If the computer detects that the student is confused then it can sugest help. This help could be a instructive website over the work or a direct contact with the teacher of this class. It doesn't do the work for them but it can provide opportunities. Same senario except the student is doing schoolwork on a program that is directly hooked up to the face recongnition program. The computer recognizes that the student is getting bored of the wokr and can either sugest a new work load, or just change the questions/work for the student. Overall this technology should be used in classroms and school work because it can provide help for the student. This technology doesn't really have any side affect other then a better graduation and or completion rate. This advancment needs to be put into action.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Venus or also called the evening star is one of the brightest of light in the night, Venus is the second planet from our sun, is simple to see safety in a point of the earth, but has proved a bigger challenge to examine more closely but also can be worthy. Venus is one of the closet planet to the Earth in terms of density and size but the orbits with the sun of the both planets are completly different, the missions that the spacecraft do not survive, is more challeging with the clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus atmosphere, on the surface of the planet can arrive temperatures of eight houndred degrees Fahrenheit, but also they have many metals and gases that can be good for our in different ways and also the curiosity of the of how can take that resources, the NASA is working in try to study that planet with electronic made of silicon that are tested with chaos of Venu's surface. In conclusion Venus is one of the bigger misterys of innovation, if we can following study them maybe some day we can arrive in that planet and also have the materials that we can use to new technology.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "After reading story Winter Hibiscus Minfong Ho I believe quote when come back Saeng vowed silently spring snows melt geese return hibiscus budding I take test again Was put story reason I believe quote concluded story ashamed tone feeling hope For example story state Saeng day hole carefully lowered plant it This shows plant areas lot The story tell readon things lack memories grandmother It represents hope Saeng always brings back happy memories push try overcome loss betters Therefore quote concludes story Saeng hope peace It represent plant blooms spring new found sense hope happiness",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Venus often reffered to as the Earth's twin is a close panet like Earth. It has about the same density and and size of Earth too. So Venus should be a worthy pursuit to explore. If anything ever happens to Earth the closest planets to explore and possibly populate are Mars and Venus. But there are some dangers to exploring these planets. For example on Venus a single rover has only lasted a couple of hours on the planet. So we dont know much about the planet. But that does not mean we cant explore and gain new information about the planet that mey help us out in the future. But the reason scientist and astronomers are looking more into the planet is because in paragraph 4. It states that Venus was probally a planet like Earth that had oceans and could have supported life. Another plus to explore Venus is the chance to figure out what happened to the planet. In the articel it says it used to be just like Earth in a way. So our natural assumption is to asume that our planet will end up just like Venus. But if we take some time and continue exploring the planet we might find some new information and could possiblly save all of humanity in the future. In conclusion the option to explore Venus still remains untuched but the positives and possibilities that could come out of this exploration are vast compared to the dangers it represents.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Several features setting affected cyclist time year desert land lack civilization lack resources especially water rugged characteristics land The cyclist traveling summer time hottest time year He also traveling deserts create even hotter climate I traveling high deserts California June quote selection tells us If traveling example comfortable Throughout trip author come desert civilization He runs deserted factory miles land without people The fact traveling desert terrain also helps us realize water scarce He trouble finding place get water This made trip extra hard discouraging I going die says As travels farther land also becomes harder travel Flat road replaced short rolling hills characteristic setting like others negatively affects cyclist making journey harder",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Dear State Senator, I think we should keep the way we elect our President because we have for been doing this for so long this why would we change it if it's already perfect? And mostly because if we were to change it then the most of the former US Presidents would'nt even be President because of there rivals? actually had most votes, for instance in the 2000 U.S. President race , Al Gore received more individual votes then George W. Bush nationwide, but Bush won the election, receiving 271 electoral votes to Gore's 266, so you see? Bush was'nt the best but he was the closest thing to it, imagine how the U.S. would be if someone else was President before. Would it be the same? Better? Worse? We will never know because we cant see things that never happened. And isnt the Electoral College a lot eaiser then an election by the popluar vote? So why change it now? We have been doing it this way for over 50 years and we never had a mistake, well not a big one at the very least.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "When constructing mooring mast ran many problems Safety main problemconcern ran Since blimps outside hydrogen helium flammable After Hindenburg blimp destroyed fire people feared would happen empire state building Another problem ran law At time law could nt fly airship low urban areas When tested blimps couldnt get close enough heavy winds This made impossible tie blimps let people It also made people fear wind would blow blimp onto sharp parts building would put hole blimp It good idea many obstacles go around make blimp docking station mooring mast successful",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Dear I believe people nt spend much time computer less exercising nt interact friends family bad health People nt spend much time They wont enjoy life outside houses My first reason people nt spend much time computer bad health Spending much time computers strain eyes Some people seizures including would trigier attack cause us space Spending much time computer mess vision damage body To thats unhealthy Another reason spending much time computer bad nt interact family friends On computer time make forget spend time friends family You would get addicted computer time You would forget say hi family You wo nt spend time friends start ingnore think nt care Being computer time mess soical activitys people My final reason spending much time computer bad enjoying nature You nt realize much missing computer Yes learn thinks computer also learn Being computer much make want exerise wo nt good body You would forget least go jog discover new thing You realize exploring nature better watching Those reasons spending much time computer bad Its health You nt interact friends family Also wo nt enjoy nature So get computer enjoy life gave",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The author of the article \"The challenge of Exploring Venus\" provides a fascinating perspective on studying the planet Venus despite dangers and doubts it could present. Supporting the claim that Venus is a worthy pursuit for humans even with the dangers and numerous factors it has, is diffucult to persuade. However, The author of this passage has supported his idea throughly with factual evidence. Firstly, in paragraph 5 the author begins his agrument on the worthy pursuit of studying Venus. the author supports his idea by provided a reliable source (NASA). the author begins his argument strongly with supported his claim with the idea of NASA. this idea can be found in paragraph 5 which says \" (NASA) has on particularly complelling idea for sending humans to study Venus... would allow scientists to float above the fray.\" the author procedes to provide an example to the reader by illustrating a jet airplane and how \"a vehicle hovering over Venus would avoid the unfrriendly ground conditions.\" The author also considers a counter-argument of how the temperature would still be around 170 degrees Fahrenheit but, gives a valid answer by saying \"the air pressure would be close to that of sea level on Earth.\" An important statement to note is that the living conditions will not as they are on earth, but \"survivable for humans.\" Continueing with the Author's idea leads to Paragraph 7. Once more, the author supports his/her claim that venus is worth exploring with a similar idea from NASA. The author outlines the claim that studing Venus would require scientists to \"get up close and personal despite the risk.\" This risk is Venus's ground conditions. This is a diffuclt task to complete, but he introduces his idea in paragraph 6 which says, \" maybe we should think of them as challenges. Many respearchers are working on innovations that would allow our machines to last long enough to contribute meaningfully to our knowledge of Venus.\" This leads to is factual evdience in paragraph 7 where the author lists NASA as one of the researchers that are working on innovations. the author furthermore provides an example of elctronics that have been tested in similar conditions of those in Venus's surface. Arguments contrasting the authors idea of exploring and researching the planet Venus are considered by the author. This approach not only strengthens his argument but, reveals that he has though out his idea thorughly. In paragraph 2, it reads \" Numerous factors contribute to Venus's reputation as a challenging planet for humans to study..\". A perfect transition to paragraph 3 were the author lists potential challenges or obstacles for exploring Venus. the passage reads in paragraph 3, \" even more challenging are the clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus's atmosphere. On the planet's surface, temperatures average over 800 degress Fahrenhiet, and the atmospheric prssure is 90 times greater than what we expierence on our own planet.\" The author considers these challenges by illustrating an example, \" such an environment would crush even a submarine accustomed to diving to the deepest parts of our oceans...\" other deadly conditions such as errupting volcanoes and powerful earthqaukes are mentioned in the same paragraph. The reason for devoting an entire paragrah to an agrument against his/her's is to answer to common question of why scientists are so intrigued to visiting the panets surface if the planet is \"inhospitable\" as well as creating an introduction to his/her arguement; The options for making a safe and scienfically productive mission.\" Supporting a rather unlogical idea on studying Venus is not easy, but the author has done just that. supporting his claims credited sources as well as considering obstacles and difficulties the scientists would face in Venus. Human curoisity and limiting our exploration of the universe should be pushed to the edge.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "My opinon of the face on mars.The face on mars is werd. Some people might like to see a face on mars.I do not want to see a face on mars.I would not like to know if there is life on mars. If I was the one that found the face on mars. I would try to find out how it was made. I would try to find out who or what made it.I would see if there is life on mars.I would of told the boss of me that we found a face on mars. I would think that there is life on mars.If I would of seen it for my self.I would of took more pictuers as we moved in space to see if it moves with the camra.If the face on mars moved with the camra. I would tell my boss that the face moves with the camra. If I was the one that is doing the reseach on the face on mars.I would try to find out why the face is on mars.I would try to find out if there any more planets the have faces on them.I would see if there is life on other planets if there is a face on the other planets.I would tell the boss if the other planets had faces on them. That is every thing I would do if I found the face on mars.I would also ask the boss for a day off. So i can get some sleep seen I did a lot of work.I would sleep after all the work I did.I would tell the boss that we did a great job of finding a face on mars.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "A new technology called the Facial Action Coding System allows computers to read human emotions has recently been invented. It works by recreating the human muscular motions in the face that are characteristic of certain emotions. Although this technology that allows computers to read emotions may seem irrelevent, ultimately the technology could potentially improve the way that students learn, and help students with social problems that they may have in school. To begin, the Facial Action Coding technology can be used to tell whether or not a student is understanding a topic. According to Dr. Huang, a professor of the Beckaman Institute for Advanced Science at the University of Illinois, \"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored...\" (6). This would allow the instructor to alter the way that they teach the topic to better convey the message. This can also be used when a student needs some kind of stimulation to be able to focus in class. The author Nick D'Alto also states that the \"software can also identify mixed emotions\" (4). This would allow the teachers to see the students who are stressed and confused and those who are happy and excited. When a student is confused or stressed, the teacher can provide additional practice or tutoring in that subject. The information that a teacher can recieve from the software in very valuable. Humans can read emotions to a certain extent, but some people are good at hiding how they really feel and this can be detrimental to their education. Dr. Huang states \" most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication\" (6). By enabling teachers to use the technology, they can offer assistance to a student who may not ask for it otherwise. In addition, students can bennefit from this technology in the social environment. According to Dr. Huang \"The facial expressions for each emotion are universal\" (4). This means that if a student were getting bullied but they were hiding it, the teachers could find out the information quickly and help the student figure out what is going on. When a student is identified as being sad or depressed, the computer coud show funny pictures to help the student feel better. In fact, \"according to the Facial Feedback Theory of Emotion, moving your facial muscles not only expresses emotions, but also may even help produce them\" (9). This means that by smiling, the students will actually make themselves feel better. Overall, the use of Facial Action Coding technology is very benneficial. Whether it be from a strictly educational standpoint, or from the social envirionment side, the results are in favor of improving the school experience of students.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "There are various means of transportation to commute from one place to another. It is believed by some that some individual selection is four-wheeler in place of two-wheeler in cities, whereas the other critics follow the opposite trend. This essay will discuss umpteen key reasons and, also likely to explore the most effective, either car or bicycle. In the modern era, the competition level is at a peak, leads to more rush and enthusiasm among the nation. To commute fast and convenient, the car is the only choice. Additionally, automobile aids in travelling more distance in lesser time, with the choice of high comfort as well as fast pace. Moreover, people also judge a personβs reputation or social status with the high brand automobile, used by them, which leads to more curiosity among society. For instance, youth might like sports cars nowadays rather than riding cycles to show high class. While on the contrary, many have a selection of two-wheelers. There are umpteen reasons; more physical fitness, Environment friendly and, are also cost-effective. The foremost reason is that bicycles are imperatively beneficial in maintaining good health, physically as well as psychologically. For instance, the riding a cycle is the best choice for Cardio patients, as it enhances heart pumping, which results in good circulation. Another convincing feature is its less pollution strategy, as it is without fuel, therefore no pollution of emission of gases. Yet another benefit is the cost of maintenance and buying, less costly while purchase and repairing are also cheaper, as it has no Hi-tech equipment. To sum up, bicycles are on the positive side of the perspective viewpoint, as health is everything, to maintain fitness and to be healthy is more significant and, also integral in preserving the world, by decreasing the global warming effects.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "As many would agree censorship growing topic concern throughout world I personally feel censorship necessary certain extent If one feels content music movie book questionable option reading listening watching Among many deabted materials movies ratings music bleeps Movies rated CAPS audiences CAPS standing parental guidence NUM parental guidence ages older lastly CAPS meaning anyone age either suggested required adult present viewing film At home ratings based parent s preference At movie theatre restrictions become sort law Anyone age thirteen permitted see movie NUM CAPS unless accompanied adult anyone older Anyone nt older enter movie rated CAPS unless accompanied someone older Depending restrictions less harsh Ultimately rating system intended force parents choose nt appropriate child As music radio curse words bleeped If person wants buy music artists required make two album one censors one without Thus creating decision usually parents usually assuming ones album music child When comes books ratings genres letting reader know author s intended audience Types genres include adult young adult children sections libraries book stores Just like music television final choice purchase dependent parents Even though many restrictions put place still faults system Obviously younger likely wo nt identification This leaves person working movie theatre option let believe age Looks decieving Buying music internet nt require type identification either How prove age When purchasing book many cashieers would stop child say that s innappropriate Maybe kids ages identification Although underlying problems censorship system seems lead back parents Censorship huge topic discussion parents today s young growing society reality issue content either rid material prohibit use puchase All s parents personal preference",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Curiosity is a characteristic that is in everybody and sooner or later it forces us to explore and create new things. The author of \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus,\" says that it is hard to explore venus but he supports exploring Venus very well. The author says that Venus is often referred to as Earth's twin and that it may once have been just like Earth. He says, \"Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth.\" This could mean that we could find remnants of an old civilization that died many ages ago. We could see what happened to them and see if there is any other form of life still alive today. Even if people say that it can't be explored because the conditions on Venus will destroy the technology we send to it, scientists are developing new ways. Scientists are working with a very old technology with cogs and wheels because they will be more durable than electronics on Venus. All in all the Author supported the study of Venus very well. I think that if anyone heard that Venus most likely used to be like Earth, used to have life on it, and could possibly still have life on it would want it to be explored.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Imagine someone sitting in class on the computer doing work that is just is not getting their attention. Now imagine a comuter that is aware of this and changes the lession up to catch their attention all based off of one's facial expressions. Interesting right? A new technology, called the Facial Action Coding System, can identify someones facial expressions based on how the muscles in their face are. This type of technology can be very useful in classrooms all around the world, and even benefit kids learning. The computers can tell when someone is getting confused or bored, It could modify the lessions to capture more attention and benefit the instructors. The computer can tell when someone is getting confused or bored. The technology could modify the lessions to get more attention. The system can help benefit the instrutors. There can and will be concerns out there about the new coding system and how it will affect the children in a negative way, however this type of new technology can help students grow and adapt to the technology of the world. That being said it can also be just as effective in the classrooms as well. Dr. Huang, the inventer of the coding system, notes that most human communucation is nonverbal, including emotion communication, so computers need to understand that to. This states that computers are learning from our emotions so it can improve to our standards and the standards of the children.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In story Rough Road Ahead Do exceed posted speed limit Joe Kurmaskie features setting affected cyclists physical abilities The features affected abilities climate dangerous environment hot rough handle These features hot rough Since California deserts June The passage supports Tumbleweeds crossed path ridiculously large snake really look like diamondback blocked majority pavement front I eased past trying keep balance dehydrated state Also features setting give determination They give determination horizon sees gives hope They give hope since knows much Yosemite National Park The passage supports drops distances I could see horizon telling could move far Id fine In story Rough road ahead Do exceed posted speed limit Joe Kurmaskie features settings affect cyclists physical mental abilities",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Characteristics and abilities of men are different from women so that men can do some jobs better than women and vice versa. My personal belief that every work is done well with both men and women. From the distant past to the present day, men always have a better physical strength than women that is why men do the hard work very well such as mechanic, engineer, doctor, β¦. In other words, they have not only clear-headed but also brave that why in case of emergency they can make a quicker decision. For example, if the doctor has difficult choices to save their patients, he will think very fast and give the best choice, which has a better result for their patients. However, although women are not as strong as men, they work with better great care and meticulous and patient than men. What in the first place me with the agreement that women always keep their house cleaning and their luggage in order so that it created a good habit for them which helps them do their jobs carefully. For instance, women can be good teachers because they are patient to wait for their students until they understand the lesson. Furthermore, girls are very skillful at doing embroidery in lieu of men because the masterpiece needs to be done with the meticulous. In conclusion, men do some jobs better than women and others by women. In the near future, women can do as well as men, despite of different characteristics and abilities.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "There are many people that are for having driverless cars, but I am against it. I am against it for many reason. First reason is because it will make people lazy. Second reason is because a computer cannot think like a human brain. Last reason is because they are not safe. My first reason I am against these cars are because they will make people lazy. America already has enough lazy people. So why will we waste money on sensors to make a car drive by itself when we can control it ourselfs. According to paragragh 7 \"They can steer, accelerate, and brake by themselfs.\" But paragraph 7 also say \"road ahead requires human skills such as navigating through work zones and around accidents.\" Which proves the only time you will actually have to drive is if you run into those situations. Another reason I am against driverless cars ae because we can't trust technolgy to get us out of every situations. For example say you are riding and you car comes out to oncoming traffic and it wont stop. There will be nothing yuo can do to stop it. But if you can actually control the car than you wont have to worry about that because you know when to stop our car. Technology wise we are not ready for a driverless vechical. My final reason I am against these cars are because the just arent safe. There are so many things that can happen while driving this car. For example a glitch can happen in the systemor you cars brakes stop working and you wont be able to stop and you could have nothing to do about it. In paragragh 6 it say a radar cost \"two hundred million dollars.\" Why can't we use that money to make cars we can frive by ourselfs safer other than wasting money on a computer that can glitch out and stop working on us? I am against driverless cars because they will make us lazier as a nation. They cannot think like a human brain. And finally because they just are not safe enough to be on the roads.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The face on Mars is a natural landform. In the article it states\"The Face on Mars is located at 41 degrees north martian latitude where it was winter in April '98-a cloudy time of year on the Red Planet.\" A lot of people believe it is a natural landform but some people think it was put there. Some people think there is life on Mars. Do you think this face is a natural landform or a sign of life on Mars? To you this might not be interesting but you will read about it everywhere. In the article it states\"The 'face on Mars' has since become a pop icon.\" The news is everywhere in places you might not expect! I think the scientists are excited about what they found. Did you enjoy hearing all the news about the Face on Mars? Were you ever reading a book or watching a film and you came across this? The article states\" It has starred in a Hollywood film, appeared in books, magazines, radio talk shows-even haunted grocery store checkout lines for 25 years!\" People could just simply sit down to read a magazine and fined this amazing news. Someone could jump in the car just to hear the news that could make your mind race wondering how they found out the news. I wonder how many people were amazed by this news! In the article it states\"Scientists figured it was just another maratian mesa, common enough around Cydonia, only this one had unusual shadows that made it look like an Egyptian Pharaoh.\" This states it unually is common around Mars. People think it is just a landform. In the article it says it is hard to find the face. Everyone seemed excited they found the face on Mars! In the article it states\"Some people think the Face is Bona Fide evidence of life on Mars-evidence that NASA would rather hide, say conspiracy theorists.\" People think there is life on Mars. They dont believe that the face is a natural land form. Many people I bet still wonder how it got there. I think this face is a natural landform. In conclusion some people believe it is natural and some don't. People weren't the only one who thought it was life so did some scientists. The other scientists say it was a normal thing on Mars. Do you think it was life or not? I think the face is just a natural landform to Mars!",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Many scientist believe that studing venus can be dangerous but it is worthy to learn about it. The author has very good point that we should find out more about Venus. They say that Venus has been covered in oceans in the past. It may have provied life like earth did.\"Often refered as Earth \"twin \", Venus is the clsoest planet to Earth term of density and size , occasionally the closest distance too.\" states the author. This means their might have been life before in Venus. Even though it is dangerous to explore I feel that we should beacuse it is important to learn about our planets. Venus reaches the average 800 degrees Fahrenheit. \"The atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experienece on our own planet.\" Those are hard chellenges that scientists have to phase when exploring the planet. It is so intresting to learn about our planets. We can compare them. \"Venus has the hotest surface tempertrue of any planet\" staes the author. Today Venus still has some of the same feature that are the same. Like our planet, Venus has valleys, moutains and craters . The planet also have strong earthquakes, and tunderstorms. Thsi makes it extra hard for scientists but its makes it hard. In text it states that \"Solar power would be plentifuol and radiation would not exceed Earth levels. Not easy conditions but survivable for humans. In coclusion, it is challenging but anything is possiable. I do agree with them.\"Our travels on Earth beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expand ed to meet the very edges of imagination and innovations.\" We should not have fear of exploring. That is what the author is saying. We should all agree with this. Life may be hard but we should explore.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "I'm in favor of changing to election by popular votes for the president of the United States, under the electoral college system they voters vote not for the president, but for a slate of electors. According to the aragument of changing election by popular votes the author says that the electoral collage is unfair to voters because of the winner take all system in each state, this shows that is unfair to vote for someone who takes all the system in each state, the author also mentions that during the 2000 campaig. seventeen states didn't see that candidates at all, this includes South Carolina and voters iin 25 of the largest media markets, one evidence from the text is when the author mentions that the election is only a few swing voters away catastrophe. The electoral college is a process that consists of electors the majority of the electal votes is required to elec the president, each candidaate running for President in your state has his or her own group of electors, for this reason in the following discussion, the word \"state\" also refers to the District of Columbai. In sum they both are a good way to select the president but to select the president by popular votes is more acordable than the other argumenet.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In these generations, the public often utilised newspapers to search for truth and understand modern world facts. The newspapers in this modern world have come in digital and physical forms. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the subjects with some examples by demonstrating my understanding. Firstly, newspapers are communications tools that are official and trusted by the public. In contrast, people often refer to newspapers to further understand the issues that happened within the community. For instants, public publishers would search for more publications' opinions, with some backup points from the professional before they published their writings in the media, which makes the community solid ideas about what was happening in society. Likewise, this is a trend that people trusted the newspaper rather than social media. On the other hand, some of the publications have more support or sponsors from some organisations or government parties their intentions might influence by their articles and news published. Hence, in the ,paper they will focus on a certain topic and argue certain issues towards their opposition, some of their arguments are making sense but they are picturing the opposition as the devil and did not critically look at the insight of the issues. As a result, these ideas will influence the reader's ideology towards society. To sum up, newspapers are significantly important towards the community, but as a reader and ,receiver we have to be more crucial in our thought and reflect on the topics that have been published in the media.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The performance of workers in completing certain tasks is considered necessary. Therefore, it is of concern to many institutions to diminish other factors causing adverse effects on the reputation of the employees including internal ones such as enthusiasm to complete a job punctually. In this sense, it is strongly advised to consider their enthusiasm before recruiting them to do a particular job. To have high-quality products from a job completed, some experts in human resources have recommended hiring those with high motivation while others still maintain conservative ways of thinking to recruit any worker without considering personal matters. Newly recruited member, therefore, deserves an enabling environment so that a worker can keep pace with the requirements of a vacant position. Toward both sides of arguments, in my personal point of view, I agree that one should work only for jobs that they like most because of some reasons. Firstly, having joy in the hearts of workers generates such an amount of energy to do beyond just getting paid at the end of job completion. Such workers can put on more effort to come up with innovative solutions so that results can be made even more attractive and beyond the target. In this sense, not only is the worker's desire being fulfilled, but also an employer is benefitted by having such a quality product. To exemplify, when leading a pneumonia intervention, I was able to save 523 children in Central Lombok over 400 children targeted by the project. The achievement came in such a greater number because I enjoyed the complexity applied to solve the mortality rate there. Secondly, the happiness derived from executing a job can create a more motivating environment of work so that many workers and other stakeholders can work in much more synchronized ways to reach a single goal. In that stage, collaboration can be much easier, and the operation of an intervention can be even much cheaper. This situation can be coined by having only one energetic worker who is able to inspire others with his/her charisma powered by an illumination of a cheerful conation. To illustrate, when leading each project, I always comprehend a project intervention to internalize the energetic excitement brought about by the project before sharing it with my co-workers when building a common understanding among us. This strategy has given me more advantage to influence my subordinates with positive energy and therefore, we were all happy at the end because of excellently demonstrated extraordinary performance in our job completion. All in all, jobs can be an opportunity to be prosperous and have internal satisfaction at the same time. One could not be much happier than having a single job in which wealth and happiness are mounted together.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Driverless cars have been a part of human fascination for quite some time now. These majestic machines have been on television in movies such as \" I, Robot\" and in television series such as \" Extant\". Even though the driverless cars on television seem to work without human control, reality suggests that these types of cars are not completely established. However, these cars are most definitely in the making. Currently, driverless cars can be both good and bad to the human population. They are good, because they allow humans to relax behind the wheel, and they assisst the driver by alerting them when something happening on the road could be harmful to them. These cars are bad, because they are made from technology and humans will pay less attention to what is going on, on the road they are driving on. Luckily, these cars have not harmed any humans or claimed any lives, so in this case, the good outweighs the bad. Driverless cars help to add knowledge and protection to the driver of the car. These smart cars are able to sense things that maybe humans were not able to see. The text says, \" The information from the sensors can cause the car to apply brakes on individual wheels and reduce power from the engine, allowing far better response and control than a human driver could manage\"(5). The smart cars can prevent humans from getting into crashes and also gives the driver a few extra eyes when watching the road. Essentially, these cars are very helpful and could prevent many crashes that could have already been avoided. Even though these cars are not 100% capabke of being driven without some sort of human directive, the improvement thus far has been rather astonishing. However, there is no reason to doubt that these cars are able t oprvent crashes,and alert the driver for when they need to take control over the wheel.Thse may be a few reasons why the cars are good for humans , but there are many other reasons why these cars are beneficial. Smart cars are benefifial to the growth of the economy. These driverless cars rely solely on technology, and technology is a great \"booster\" of the economy. The economy rose when the invention of the first smart phone entered the market, and the same thing can happen with a smart car. The text says, \" The cars he forsees would use half the fuel of today's taxis and offer far more flexibility than a bus. He believes such cars would fundamentally change the world\"(1). The future of the smart cars could enhance the existing transportation system, which would cut down on the annul cost of running a bus station, train station, etc. Not only to mention, people may enjoy the cars even more than the existing ways of transportaion, because it is fascinating, and there will not be too many more people than there are seats. Also, gas is a crucial part of the economy, and reducing the use of gas intake would lead to more advancements in other areas of the economy. This could lead to the advancement in an artificial life form, or mind , or something along those lines. In conclusion, smart cars are appearing to be a good addition to the transportation era. They will assisst the driver, alert the driver, and boost the economy. These are all things that are needed, becase too many crashes take place each day, and no one can be trusted when driving an automobile. The world needs a change and the economy needs a crutch to lie on. There is no doubt that smart cars are able to do these things in every way possible. Even though there are some things that are not too particularly great about the smart cars, these cars have too many perks to just throw aside. Also, some people may not be interested in this type of change, but once they see the great things about these cars and check their driving history, they are sure to change their perspective. Although these carrs are not 100% available to all people, one day they will be and the world will be a much better place.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "This is such a life changing expirience it is the opportunity of a life time and if you dont do it then that really stinks for you. you can see plenty of famous artifacts all around Europe that you can visit.Then if you just love ships and boats then you should go beacause there is alot of that where I go. Also if you love horses then you should do what i do you can get to feed them all day and you get to pet them too. The best part is helping the needs of others if you dont want to do that then, I think that something is wrong with you. If you like vollyball then you should come on with me becauce we have plenty of time to play it. If you dont go you are missing out on a lifetime amount of fun and plenty of stuff way better than sitting down watching tv.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The story Do exceed posted speed limit cyclist got bad direction Yosemite National Park depleeding water supply extreme heat He doubtful make journey dehydrated dizzy",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In excerpt Narciso Rodriguez sets mood relaxation happiness joy overall feeling satisfaction unity The describes feelings home much made feel overjoyed In paragraph says Here innocence childhood congregation family friends endless celebrations encompassed formed backdrop life warm home In particular sentence tring get mood like heaven earth thing The tring give reader factual information home also tring exagerate emotion make paradise In paragraphs emphasizes courageous kind selfless parents always greatful He shows statements like They came selflessly give children better life Generosity selflessness two lessons parents tell They showed lives The sets mood story paradise everyone",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Dear news editors name I would like write article effects computers people Computers technological item past years They allow people learn many new skills get important work done even socialize However experts believe people spend much time computers people active healthy Everyone wants healthy While computers fun useful could negative effect society employed number dropping people need get work done keep jobs even keep businesses open With computers available work school much work done programs like people type reports programs like iCalculator workers calculate taxes faster time work Some people working stocks days stocks could good bad need keep You go stock websites control buy sell without raising phone bill calling brokers Laptops make work possible go Computers teach many skills need know jobs skills need times life You learn typing work programs programing needed lines work Computers increase math skills hand eye coordination And read favorite books via online scans wondering pick real book Well cant online scans free Not computers teach skills work fun Between twitter email googleBUZZ mySpace ooVoo skype gamesradar lots ways talk friends meet new people On I people talk whenever I want Why talk real people ask well answer simple maybe lazy nobody wants go anywhere maybe friends want talk right bed time Talking real people important cant done time Online gaming become sensation game So many people gaming missing amazing experience Some people think gaming waste time said indoor leisure activity everybody needs fun activity anytime Besides everybody likes fun Some people believe ludicrous notion technology making fat lifeless losers opposite socialize online meet new people People like balance computers games exercize sports With computers efficently complete work learn new skills Computers posotive used correctly I hope like artice thanks reading",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In the dawning age of technology upon the rapidly advancing human race, the replacement of a human with a technological innovation has become nearly commonplace. The essence of evolution has been proven to be highly centralized around the concept of making things easier. This innovation does exactly that, but it is questionable as to whether or not it is meeting all of the criteria more sufficiently than a human would. Although computers have reached a point of heavy advancement, no machine could take into account the myriad of variables that find themselves associated with human behavior, and for that reason, they should not be relied upon in an educational environment. Firstly, it is important to define the problem and its components in this specific context. An emotion is, in its most basic form, an expression of a reaction to a stimulus. The problem lies not within the detection of emotions, but within the unlimited possibilities of these stimuli. Dr. Eckman separated these reactions into the six categories of \"happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness,\" but he cannot possibly classify all of the derivatives of these reactions. In an educational environment, it is extremely important for a teacher to always understand the situation. Dr. Huang's only claim on this topic is that \"a classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored,\" but that does not even take into account all of the emotions that a student could display, let alone all of the stimuli that could be causing it. A student could be confused or bored simply because the material is going over their head, or perhaps their minds are convoluted as a result of mourning over the loss of a loved one. The software is programmed to analyze the \"action units\" made by muscular movement, but that muscular movement is simply a reaction to something that cannot be accurately predicted or observed, at least not merely through a countenance. Perhaps this computer can accurately collect data on basic emotion, but it is not going to know what to do with the data it collects if it cannot detect specifically what is causing a specific, undesirable result. Secondly, it is important to consider the limitations of both humans and machines in this context, and weigh the outcomes accordingly. The author of the article states in the fifth paragraph that \"we humans perform this same impressive 'calculation' every day.\" Such is proven to be true, and so the encouragement for a device to do it for us is asinine. Machines are made for efficiency, and so this concept must be evaluated on the change in efficiency. Clearly, based on the afore point on the impossibility of detection of stimuli, there is a limit to the efficiency of the machine with which the limit to the human efficiency must be compared. In order to solve the blockade between the sender and recipient, the recipient must ascertain to the sender that no harm is done in yielding more information, and the sender must, in turn, yield more information. Human interpersonal exchange executes this procedure perfectly, but based on the article alone, Huang's software cannot serve as a sufficient sender, nor a sufficient recipient, for it can neither ask for more information nor interpret information that it gets. A teacher can make the same observational interpretation by reading their students' faces, but the difference is that a teacher can ask what is troubling them and offer support, for it is the stimulus that is causing the problem to arise, for without a stimulus, there is no physical or emotional reaction. \"Most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication,\" admits Dr. Huang. Therefore, this emotional communication should not be treated as something so formulaic; as something that is easily decipherable by anything simpler than the infinitely diverse and complex human brain. Dr. Huang's creation is undoubtedly impressive, and will serve an effective purpose somewhere in the world, but that purpose does not reside in an academic environment. Its properties are accurate, but it lacks the psychological ability to help a student, or a person in general, tackle a problem in the way that it is needed to be handled. This software may be able to accurately observe for humans, but until it can accurately think for them, and communicate for them, and resolve for them, it is the job of none other than the human to make sure that something is being done about any problems that they encounter. Humans are not algorithmic creatures, and no algorithmic software is ever going to provide them with the emotional nor psychological support that they need in order for them to move forward.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In this article I'm writing an arugumentative essay on whether or not the use of this new technology calld Facial Action Coding System which enables computers to identify human emotions of students in a classroom is valuable. I think that this new technolgy called Facial Action Coding Systems is a good and valuable thing to have in the classroom.I think that having this in the classoom would better express everyones emotions because no one really knows how someone is really feeling on the inside. Having this new techonolgy would possibly help everyone because if people know how you really feeling than they could possibly help you feel better insted of keeping what ever is going on in the inside and it just keep hurting. \"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored.\" This also would be good because most of the time when things like this happen students dont speak up. Having this techonolgy we can actually \"caculate\" how someone is feeling.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The Facial Action Coding System is a computer system created to recognize human emotions which can be used in various environments to help a person with their task at hand, whether it be work, school work or even just a person playing games on their computer. This technology (the Facial Action Coding System) can be of great use in a school environment as explained in the article because often enough students will easily get bored or confused when doing their work so if this system is in place the lesson can be adjusted to the student's needs. There would also be many uses to this system which as example would make it a tool for the work or school environment, make video game character faces much more expressive, the usage of it for video surgery and a way to control which ads you see at the given moment. Although I see this system not always being so accurate (especially in the begining) it will help in the long run of things because it can alert you of how you feel so as an example if you are someone with a weak heart and an assignment from your boss at work is making you overly stressed your computer can warn you about your current condition so you can stop and take a break. The Facial Action Coding System is a computer system created to recognize human emotions which can be used in various environments to help a person with their task at hand, whether it be work, school work or even just a person playing games on their computer so yes this computer device will be of great use because of it's wide range of possibilities.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The mood Narciso Rodriguez created happy uplifting mood It makes feel like wish family could like You wish hope could life like everyone anything everyone close dinner every night together He makes seem like money best way live That even though left family friends jobs everything okay You family blood family They much fun people met excited made fun culture tradition The whole neighborhood one big family call older people living basement grandparents real grandparents Cuba It makes think family",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In the story A Cowboy Who Rode the Waves,is about a person who just graduated highschool. He had already been working two part-time jobs. Then his friend Don invited him to go to Europe on a cattle boat. He couldn't say no. Luke knew it was an opportuity of a lifetime. When they got their,Lke and Don signed up to take care of animals. In 1945 of August, they received their orders to go to New Orleans. They didn't arrive until August 14th. When they arrived Luke and Don got their seaman papers and boarded the SS Charles W.Wooster, then headed forn greece. This opportunity was good for Luke because he had just graduated highschool. As they headed over sea, they had a cargo of 335 horses plus enough hay and oats to feed them. Before arriving Greece, Luke had turned 18 which ment he could be drafted for military service. By the time Luke was discharged in 1947, Luke had made nine trips the most of any Seagoing Cowboy. Luke's carrer was getting farther and farther. He was happy for his self.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "It is true that most of the celebrities are known for their luxurious lifestyles than for their performance or talents these days. Also, many people think that this kind of attitude is not a good example for the young generation. In the following essay, I will express my agreement and also disagreement. On the one hand, it is a fact that many famous people become popular due to their fancy lifestyle, instead of their outstanding achievement these days. Their acting talent might be standard or below the average, but they are making sensation to the public by showing their wealth and glamorous lifestyles. For instance, would be Kamal R Khan, whose luxurious mansion, party and views on other celebrities are more famous than his acting. It is believed that the behaviour would be a negative influence for the young people as it teaches them about hedonistic lifestyle. On the other hand, there are people who have shown to the world that they have reached success due to strong determination and hard work. One of the famous Brazilian athlete once said β βSuccess is not accidental. It is hard work, perseverance, learning, sacrifice and love of what you are doingβ. For example, would be the legendary Nawazzudin Sidique. His career from National School Drama to Bollywood will always be an inspiration for many struggling actors. These kinds of celebrities are worth to be followed by the young generation. In conclusion, I agree and also disagree to a certain point. In my opinion, we should guide the youth in selecting the role model not just from the reel life but also from the real life.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Minfong Ho author Winter Hibiscus concluded story Saeng vowing retake pass drivers test spring geese fly back plant rebuds The author concluded story paragraph signify Saengs willingness start After failing test Saeng visits green house misses old home Vietnam She buys hibiscus plants comes home noting geese flying south Winter The plant signifies memories When first sees its blossomed In spring rebud form another blossom growing bigger This parallels Saeng getting sadness homesickness rebuilding better memories growing stronger When gets chance The birds flying overhead headed south winter shelter cold In spring return start raise goslings rebuild home start last spring Saeng planning start pass drive feel accepted Minfong Ho chose end story paragraph signify characters starting rebuilding good memories",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Many students are using computers in school, but unlike teachers do the computers know when the student is bored or confused? The Facial Action Coding System is a computer able to idenitfy your emotion. This technology can be valuable to students using computers to learn because it can detect their emotion and modify the lesson for the student. Computers are very much used by students on a daily basis, and it teaches the student a lot of content. When the student becomes bored or confused the computer can't recognize that like how a teacher would be able to. Having a computer that could tell the emotions of the student behind the screen and modify the lesson would be very benificial to the student. As stated by Dr. Huang in paragraph 6 \"Most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication, So computers need to understand that, too.\" This shows that the computer knowing your facial expressions and being able to detect your emotions is something that can be very useful. This new software is a great way for humans and computers to have better communication. The Facial Action Coding System can be very useful to students to students who use computers to learn. This is useful to students because this software is able to detect their emotions and modify the lesson they are being taught. This computer can tell exactly how the student is feeling which is helping the student and computer have better communication.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Its said laughing good part life also said healthy get chucks ture good laugh makes everyone better person",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The article \"Driveless Cars Are Coming\" states examples and ideas of how cars that drive themselves without a driver. I believe this idea of cars being controlled with no human assist or little assist is outrages. This is because a machine can not function like a human brain can. They can't put two and two together and make decision that is logical or reasonable. I am against the idea of driveless cars because a machine or technology can not do what a human can. All of the thoughts of this driveless car are created from whom, humans. A living being with a brain that can process information and then solve the situation and put things together that can fix it. A machine can not do so because a machine can not make another machine without us, the human, the being, the creator. The human conscience is the only thing that I have heard of that do something like that, but wait that isn't some external machine or technology that has been because if that was the case this arguement would not be visible. It is inside the human's body brain system. It is what controls the brain which controls the body which controls the human life. A car is not a human, it is nothing but a mere object that we,humans, made in order to get from one place to another faster than walking, runnning, or using a bicycle. There is no way in any shape of form an idea that we are able to make where we can put the human concsience into a car so it can function by itself and create real world decisions while it is driving down Keystone Ave. If there is such technology in this world then prove myself and others statments wrong. The article does state \"...Google has had cars that could drive independtly under specific conditions since 2009...Google cars aren't truly driveless; they still alert the driver to tale over when pulling in and out of driveways or dealing with complicated traffic issues, such as navagating through roadwork or accidents.\" So, there is a car that can drive without that much of an assitiance, but there is a catch. The driver has to make certain decision with the car. The car can only go a certain speed or it may cause accidents. The car needs help to drive like it always did and will always be. Driveless cars are impossible to create without a human conscience because of real world situaitions it will have to go through in order to get from place to place. The idea is pointless. We can not and should have never thought of the idea and example of a \"Nightrider\" on this planet Earth that we call home and many other names and lables. Automakers need to stop trying to make this \"driving a car without human help\" a trend. I hope it becomes a fad and dies before I hit the age of average retirement.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The author ends story given paragraph get across It highlights things important familiar saeng gave comfort uses essentially say shell take test feels better The winter hibiscus plant saeng remembered life back home story sow plant a wave loss deep strong stung saeng s eyes swept her Saeng unable comfort emotions first saw plant realized much missed old life The plant mentioned final paragraph blooms spring winter hibiscus help fill emotional void help saeng try take test She also mentions geese reason different way Unlike winter hibiscus took geese become through quiet repetition season upon season almost familiar now Saeng mentions get used strange unfamiliar parts life come grips failed test Therefore mentioning things last paragraph saeng uses familiar objects foreign domestic illustrate coming grips failure",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In America people use automobiles for evryday life. Look at it this way, if there werent any cars anymore we would be walking all the time. Which would leed to bad joint pain and expensive doctor bills. Plus think of how crowded the side walks would be. Your kids would get lost or even stolen right out from under your nose now do you really want that. Automobiles have been around forever why ruin what people worked so hard to gain. A lot of people would lose their job if we got rid of them. You think the unemployment rait is bad now get rid of cars and watch it increase. If we had to walk everywhere, that pain that just went away in your ankles and feet would suddenly come back again. And what if your in a hurry to get to work how are you going to get there in time if your only going at a walking speed. The crowd would slow you down emensly, even at school the crowd can slow a person down by a lot. when the teacher lets us out early I dont have to fight the crowd as much and can get to my parent much faster to go home. Think about the children, if you were walking one day to the store and look back to see that your five year old is suddenly missing, what would you do. You would look and see nothing but people in the crowd, you would have no clue to who has your child. But if your in your car and you look back he/she will be right there safe and sound waiting to get home to watch there favorite show, not in the hands of a stranger wondering who is this person and will I ever see my mommy again. We Americans work hard for what we get in life, and if you get layed off from your job what gose through your head. Well I dont personnly have a job but you do, and so do hundreds of people at Ford Motor Company, and General Motors two very famous automobile manufacturers. If we dont drive cars and buy cars guess what happens they lose money and if a huge manufactuer loses money then its time to start lowering wages and laying people off. So do you really want that. So think before you do things like take away our car rights. The prompt says to find good things about not having cars but I just cant because the bad is more bad than the good is good. Personnly if I had a child I wouldnt want him/her being stolen by a stranger. Or being me being layed off because people dont wnat to harm the earth's atmosphere.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Housing scarcity is thorny a social issue every government needs to resolve. After all, over-high housing price exerts a detrimental influence on peopleβs happiness index. Some people argue that only the government can relieve the pressure of housing because the most supreme governmental administration. Personally speaking, governments do have a vital role to play in stabilizing the housing price, but there are still other means to tackle this severe problem. Indeed, I have to concede that governments canοΌ in more ways than oneοΌ restrain the ever-accelerated cost of new houses . One of the most effective ways to control over the expenditure of the house is to deter the greedy speculators or property developers from flipping homes, more preciselyοΌ the vacancy rate could be greatly reduced when governmental interruption works. Moreover, governments are supposed to strengthen the supervision over real estate developers so that it helps to stop those illicit merchants from disrupting the regular economic orders. However, the effort made by home buyers and builders is indispensable. As far as wealthy house purchaser who desires to earn high interests in housing investment concerned, they should learn to eliminate their avarice for an enormous house. The rich had better assume the responsibility to set a fine example for society. In this way, the public will learn that housing investment is not the only worthwhile way to allocate wealth. In the meanwhile, ordinary buyers not only ought to work diligently to raise money for future house investment, but also make full use of the government policies and bank loans to promote the standard of living. Furthermore, the buildersβ efforts cannot be ignored. Firstly, they ought to transfer their housing strategy from building luxurious villas to popularizing economically affordable houses. Only when cheaper houses are built by property developer can they meet the demands of common house consumers. Similarly, mass media have the duty to alter peopleβs mode of thinking in house via encouraging people to rent houses if they cannot own their property in short time. In closing, I reaffirm my conviction that it is rather superficial to simply say that only government can address the housing shortage problem. Concerted efforts should be made by house buyers and builders.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "As a normal student going to school everyday. I do not feel the need to have a machine tell me what my emotions are. I feel they have the right to want ro deny the chance to get that done or not. The process begins when the computer constructs a 3-D computer odel of the face; consisting of all the 44 major muscles in facial region. All of these muscles must move like human muscles. Eckman has classified 6 basic different emotions. Happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness. All of these emotions are associated with different muscles in the facial region. Some examples given were frontalis pars lateralis muscle raises when you are surprised. Another example would be the orbiculars oris tightens your lips when you show anger. \"The facial expressions for each emotion are universal\" observes Dr. Huang. In humans we perform this same impressive \"Calculation\" everyday. For example you can probably tell that your friend is feeling a certain way or not by looking at their facial expressions. Dr. Huang observes that artists such as Da Vinci studied human anatomy to help him paint the facial muscles muscles precisely enough to convey specific emotions. The technolagy that has been created for the facial recognition is a great idea. Except i beleive that it should only be used as a psycholgical purposes only.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Driverless cars, good or bad? To me, driverless cars isn't the worse thing ever thought of but it isn't the smartest either. I'm against driverless cars. Technology does fail, who would want to risk that in a car? Today, people are worried a lot about technology and driving. Having a driverless car could distract anyone because they'd probably get side tracked with all the technology inside the car. It's a waste of money and time. I also feel like it's just being lazy. What's wrong with just driving yourself? Another problem with this driverless car is, who is there to blame if there's an accident? There might be some people who fall for the concept \"Driverless\". There would also be constant worries for the driver. Technology does fail, so riding in car that's bound to destruct and/or just fail you'd be worried constantly when all you really wanna do is hop in the car and reach your destination safely. The last problem is what's really the point of a driverless car and you have to keep your hands on the wheel and be ready for anything that comes your way, as stated in the story. There's no point of a driverless car unless your lazy and there are taxi's for that matter. Needless to say, a driverless car isn't the best thing to drive. Especially when it's supposed to be driverless. In conclusion, driverless cars are useless. Technology fails, people get distracted by it, and you wouldn't know who to blame if the car was crashed or even destructed, and there's no point of the car what so ever.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "it's mainly talking about how many percent of people do not own cars or people who old there cars. If I had a good car nothing wrong with it. I would make payments on it. It might not be the best car but hey long as i can get somewhere on time. I really don't know much about Vaubans but they are knid of nice. My dream car is V8 Titans Nessian i really love those trucks I hoping my mother will get me one but that all depends on my behavior at home and school plus grades those are more important. When the suburbs came out i thought it came from china but it said \"Automobiles are the linchpin of suburbs, where middle-class familes from chicago to shanghai tend to make their homes. And that experts say, is a huge impediment to current efforts to drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions from tailpipes.... Passengers cars are responsible for 12 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in europe and up to 50 percent in some car-intensive areas in the United States.\" It also saids \"Vauban home to 5,500 residents within a rectangular square mile, may be the most advanced experiment in low-car suburban life. In this new approach, stores are placed a walk away, on a main street, rather than in malls along some distant highway.\" I love cars well actually theres curtent cars that i like but hey you got to love them right V8 titan i love the most.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "It identifirs the exprestions of ever feeling that was show on our face. The facial expressions for each emotion are all universal buy the different individuals often show varying degrees of expression that are not like a siling as broadway. (Nick D'Alto) The Mona Lisa is a painting that dosent show much of an exprestion within her smile, but we can somewhat make out that she is somehow is smiling but with another expretion with it. Fpr according to the computer softwar, the Mona Lisa is mostly happy within the picture but also has other fellings like disgusted, fearful and angry. What most people don't understand is that the software has identified that there are more to what meets the eye of an expretion in life. After having many sciencetist look into this, many have found that by making a smile has to create some kind of an exprestion that we can identifie without technology itself. not all emostion can be identified but at least there is a way to show them through actions. What I say is that the technology that we us today is not always what we need in life to find out about a simple smile where we can just feel and see it with our own eyes. Its just basic reactions from an expretion that we naturally know what they mean. So i say that we do not need any type of technology for experections.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The author Winter Hibiscus concludes story paragraph show connection hibiscus The hibiscus survive winter spring bloom became big beautiful connecting flower saying make obstacles come change enviroment flower deal confined plastic container surviving weather She feels right s likes Hibiscus Shes trapped area alien adjust Just container alien flower its used free But its planted become part s surroundings grow And accepts change becomes willing start begin grow cause driving test easier In conclusion reason author concluded paragraph sentence",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The builders Empire State building faced several obstacles throughout building procedure First many dirigibles filled hydrogen gas rather helium hydrogen highly flammable following German dirigle Hindenburg Empire State Building owners realize much worse accident could resulted decision utilize mast docking area Also Al Smith decided build additional mooring mast onto top building due weight docking blimps architects invest modify building s framework enable support weight dangling blimp due violent winds docking dirigibles could properly land constantly shifting Lead weights could nt used dangers impracticalities idea could set Finally seems overall safety practicality mooring mast nt easily attainable Al Smith states engineers trying dope practical workable arrangement Hence builders Empire State experienced many obstacles attempting allow dirigibles dock building",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Art is an important culture in the world. Art promotes an understanding and appreciation of the uniqueness of our different cultures, stories, experiences and personal perspectives. This is the focus of debate, and there are two reasons it behind. The first reason is that children think art is a most important subject . The second is that children are affected by their impeded learning. In this essay, the possible reasons behind and measures of my views on the following points. The reasons for this trend may involve the recognition that people think art is basically subject for kids in school.In art education, while children are growing up art is shouldn't without in their life. Art provides people with an enhanced awareness of our diverse culture in the world. By contrast, destroying the children's time is the other problem. It would be a busy learning environment in Hong Kong. Toughen schedules, and massive homework both torture children every day. However, there are certainly dangers in taking time off if donβt take the subject of art in the children's school life. Children may end up never returning to their studies or finding it difficult to readapt to an art academic environment. In the fact, they are only learning the main subjects like Chinese, English, and Maths. Children can not establish their self-esteem and raise their confidence in different fields of the subject. But overall, I think this is less likely today, most of the schools involve the subject of art, and organise a campaign of competition of art, it is overweighed to nothing. My view is that children should be encouraged to broaden their horizons. That is the best way for them to get a clear perspective of what they are hoping to do with their lives and why. Children with such a perspective are usually the most effective and motivated to pay attention to art , which is the best way to gain a deeper diverse vision of themselves.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Imagining the future without having to manualy drive cars is amazing but it would also be a big hasle. Having these cars would save lots of money and fuel. There is a lot to do with these special cars. Some of the postive things about having these cars built is the way their sensors, driving and assisting, and laws work. Some of the negative outcomes is that the sensors might not work all the time or the car still needs manual help on some conditions. Brin Can is the man who thought of this whole idea. He works for Google. Brin has a plan to make these cars drive themselves by 2020. He says having these cars made would save on fuel. Americans would only use half the fuel they use now. Also making transportation far more comfortable than a bus or a train. With not having them made Americans would still drive manually like the usual. Without this the people could still drive drunk on off of something and get into far more accidents than these smart cars. These autonomous cars can steer, accelerate and brake all by themselves. Plus it has monitors surrounding the car for any accidents to prevent. Engineers at Berkeley have use something useful. They put this magnet into the car to help it sense postive and negitive polarity in the binary code. There are sensors on the front and end of the car. Google said for the cars to become more smarter the car needs more sensors. Having these would help humans get into far less accidents then they would by themselves. Still not having these with the regular cars humans can see behind the car or around them as easily as if they had sensors. On these smart cars some good ways to alert humans that they need to take control is the windsheild would flash if the driver needed to take control. Also the seatbelt will vibrate if backing into something. It also announces when the driver should take over. Some negitive aspects of having these cars would be that the sensors or the car arent 100% there yet. This anonomous car still needs human help when backing out of a driveway or going around construction. Having to be aware and waiting your turn to take over would get boring. That would be very tiring. Why wouldn't you want these hand free cars? That help you when needed and giving you some free time. With the help of these cars and can prevent 80% of the accidents that happen when a human is either tired, drinking or lost control of the car. This car will be here before you know it. Telsa has projected a 2016 release for a new car. The Nissan, Audi, and Mercedes-Benz will be the new start of this generation. These cars are hoping to be made and drive themselves by 2020.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Driverless cars are in our near future, but is this the best way? There are many reasons why I dont believe so, such as the fact that they are going to need to make logical decisions and could be dangerous to drivers and pedestrians due to the drivers not needed to pay as much attention to driving. What does it mean for a computer to make a logical decision? Lets imagine that your in a driverless car, and your headed towards an inevidable crash that will kill you. The only way to get out of it is to go on the sidewalk, where 3 small children are playing hop-scotch. If your watching \"in-car entertainment\" and the computer decides that you need to take over at this time, there is no time for us as humans to think. This is a major problem that will come up. Unless everyone's cars are fully driverless, its hard to prevent this scenario. This would mean we would have to make traditional cars as we know it, illegal. Fully driverless cars are coming, but there are a lot of problems that we need to address before that happens. The idea of logical decision making for a computer processing things in 1's and 0's is a hard conundrum to overtake. Once we address whether or not the government keeps or takes away our driving privledes, then we can garauntee that our roads will be fully safe.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The builders Empire State Building faced several challenges building dock dirigibles They would able simply place mooring mast flat roof Empire State Building The thousandfoot dirigible held single cable would make frame unsturdy With weight dirigible wind pressure would get transmitted eleven hundred feet foundation The would need make frame stronger stand stress would cost sixty thousand dollars In end mooring mast never made safety unpredictable nature law It unsafe due highly flammable dirigibles putting high populated region danger The winds would shift constantly violently difficult control dirigible Also law airships flying low urban areas would made illegal Ships would able ever tie building even approach area Overall many obstacles made impossible engineers build mooring mast",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In this article the author doesn't support his idea very well of Venus being a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents. He talks about how most people being sent to venus dont return, in addition the atmosphere is very dangers for humans, and they dont even have the technolgy yet to make it a safe trip. All of those topics will be discussed in the following paragraphs explaining why the evidence the author has does not support his claim. The first reason why the authors evidence to his claim wasnt very good was because he started off his article talking about the spacecraft that haven't returned from their mission to Venus. For example in paragraph 2 the author says \" humans have sent numerous spacecraft to land on this cloud-draped world. Each previous mission was unmanned, and for good reason, since no space craft survived the landing for more than a few hours.\" The author is telling us straight forward that it is NOT safe to travel to this planet and you may not even come back and then he goes on to saying \" Maybe this issue explains why not a single spaceship has touched down on venus in more than three decades.\". This only tells the readers that scientist aren't even comfortable with sending people anymore because of the failed attempts they have had in the past. Lastly the author says \" Numerous factors contribute to Venus's reputation as a challenging planet for humans to study, despite its proximity to us.\". This sentence backs everything up making it clear that humans arent returning because we arent equipped or ready to deal with these \"factors\". Which brings us right into our next point. The next thing that made the author lack while trying to support his claim is when he talked about all the dangers thier were for humans. In paragraph 3 the author states \"On the planets surface, temperatures average over 800 degrees fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet.\". The conditions on this planet are almost impossible for people to live in which is probably why most dont make it back. The author then says \" Also noteable, Venus has the hottest surface temprature of any planet in our solar system\". This is a big point because it seems like small information that didnt need to be added but, really it's big because they wouldn't have put it in there if it wasn't something that raised some concern. Lastly the author says \" Beyond high pressure and heat, Venusian geology and weather present additional impediments like erupting volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, and frequent lightning strikes toprobes seeking to land on its surface.\". This goes right into our last paragraph because if they dont have the right technology to help and keep the people traveling to this planet safe then they won't make it back. The last thing that leads me to believe that the authors evidence wasn't very good was the way he talked about the lack of technology. For example in the in the fifth paragraph, the author says \" but the air pressure would be close to that of sea level on earth. Solar power would be plentiful and radiation would not exceed Earth levels. Not easy conditions, but survivable for humans.\". He also states \" More importantly, researchers cannot take samples of rock, gas, or anything else from a distance. Therefore, scientist seeking to conduct a thorough mission to understand Venus would need to get close and personal despite the risks.\". These two sentences could not be more blunt on the fact that we just do no have the technology at the moment to get everything we want, and to keep everything safe. Throughout the article the authors claim was not supported very well by evidence. there were to mant things that came into play cause it to not be safe nor get what they needed.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The Author support the idea that studying venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers Venus is actually a planet. in our system solar. Venus is the second planet from our sun. Venus is the closest planet planet to Earth in terms of density and size. Venus is sometimes we are closer to Mars and others time to Venus. On the planet's surface, temperatures averange over 800 degrees fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater. Venus has the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system. Venus was probably covered largely with Oceans and could have supported varios forms of life just like earth, today Venus still has some features that are sediment and includes familiar features such as valleys, mountains and craters, furthermore, recal that Venus can some times be our nearest option for aplanetary visit people like visit at planet Venus they want know about the planet. The scientists say tha planet is delete at de solar system because Venus is a little planet in solar system it was delate. approaches to studying Venus. for example, some simplified electronics made of silicon carbide have been tested in a chamber simulating the chaos of venus's surface and lasted for trhee weeks in souch conditions. human curiosity know more about Venus the little planet in solar system. In planet Venus there not are life, people can live there at the planet Venus, Only in this planet are life.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Personally, i do not think this type of technology is useful and is not even close to being valuable in todays society. I do not see a real use for it especially in a classroom. I belive someone would only try to make something like this for the money. First of all, i think this technology is very invading. Way too many people get offended nowadays and putting a camera on their face while trying to learn is not a very good solution in my book. The author states \"' a classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored,' Dr. Huang predicts 'Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.\" (Alto 1). Having the lesson change here and there for every different student will have bad news written all over it. They will all be looking at different things and will not be on the same page, so when they have a question and go to ask the teacher, the teacher will be occupied with all of the other questions the students have. I also belive this technology is a good idea mainly because it is a technology. Every single server in the world has the potential to be hacked by anyone, anywhere. So if someone breaks into this software then they can watch thousands off kids through the camera that is continuously on their face watching their emotions. If i was a parent i would not want to have my kids participating in the use of this software. On the other side of things, i can see how this might help a few students. If they do not like how the teacher teaches the class or just simply does not understand the material, they can just make a sad face and try to learn the lesson a different way until it finally clicks in their head. In the end, i belive that there are more things that could go wrong rather than right. This technology can be very invading, students have the possibility of getting off track from eachother, and most importantly i dont think that it is very safe or reliable. The risk overpowers the reward on this technology and for that reason, i do not put any value into this technology.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In the artical, \"Making the Mona Lisa Smile\" by Nick D'Alto, D'Alto states that using software to identify human emotions could have uses in the classroom. D'Alto has a point when stating that computers could change lessons and lesson plans when they see a student or students get bored or confused, but I have my reasons as to otherwise. I do not believe this should be used in a classroom setting, due to it not only taking away from what a teacher must do, dramaticly changing how schools teach, but is also an invasion into how a student may feel about one part of our sociaty that they may want to keep to themselves. This software watches faces and can tell how a person is feeling this may seem intelegent to use in a classroom, but I beg to differ. Is this not what a teacher is supposed to do? In a classroom setting a teacher is supposed, not only to show you what information they are teaching, but also not make it drivilingly boring so students lose intrest. They must watch how their students react. The artical states \"A classroom computer could recognise when a student is becoming confused or bored...Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.\" Let us focus on the last point of the quote, \"like an effective human instructor,\" why would we need computers to replicate what a human should do in a classroom setting. If computers can do this why employ teachers at all? If this is the approch we take then what is stopping the world from disbanding schools, and just having students learn online. This could put millions of teachers out of a job. Another quote worth addressing is this, \"Most human comunication is nonverbal...computers need to understand that too.\" Reiterating what I stated earlier why do comuters in the classroom need this when we have human teachers. My second point is, who in the world stated that all school wanted to use computers to teach children. \"A classroom computer,\" is somthing D'alto talks about a lot in this section. What if a school hasn't yet empoyed the use of computers like other schools have? If they are still just pen and paper and have been for years, why fix what isn't broken. If a school can teach without computers why add computers in where there are none needed. Adding these could ruin what works about schools, and how they teach their children. Finaly, if a lesson online is, for example, teaching about the republican party in a mainly democratic area and a student does not look descusted but Intreged or interested. The computer, as the artical states, can identify this along with other emotions. If they are republican in a democratic demographic they could be shunned by their once friends. Having this in classrooms could ruin the chances of someone being socialy accsepted by people if they do not agree with the widly acssepted oppinion. There is always the chance that bringing this into schools and having your emotions layed out for everyone to see could lead to higher rates of bullying, and therefore, higher rates of suicide. Now i am not stating that this software is not useful in a homeschool environment or in a phsyciatrists lobby. This could be useful in these and many other situations. A homeschool student having trouble could be conected to diffrent touters based on how they react to the lessons being taught. In a psyciatrists lobby you could pre-identify who has come because they are depressed, angry, or those who were forced to come due to the desgusted looks on their faces. This software could be used in so many difftent ways, but the immence changes and the hurt it could put on schools and its teachers are the reason that I do not believe it should be used in a school setting.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "I think rooms certain adult books I think age get books section I feel strongly libraries every differnt kind book anyone Everyone goes library think open library different kinds books If kid teenager trying get adult book someone age come check book I think libraries everyone community everyone reads looks good nice books look naughty books right go check books like When go library able go get whatever genre want restrictions I think restriction made age limit naughty adult books novels bad behind desk age get My conclusion going look kinds books restrictions look You age romance novels darougatory books library tons books magazines restrictions",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "What do most people think can do things better, people or machines? I, like most people, believe things are done better by hand. Would someone want a lifesaving operation done by a living doctor that knows what is going on and where things are, or a robot that is programmed to do it and could malfunction. I believe that driverless cars pose a threat against people and cars should remain in human control at all times. Cars do not actually see the things that surrond them. If the driver decides not to pay attention and one of the cars sensors were to malfunction then the lives of many people hang in balance. Road constructions and traffic jams could pose a threat as well. When these things happen do the cars just shut down or try and get through themselves. Either way major safety hazards will arise. Just like in paragraph 2, right now \"driverless\" cars cannot even get out of a driveway alone. Unless some major ajestments were to come soon, driverless cars remain a huge threat to safety. What if someone were to get hurt in a driverless car accident? The car malfunctions and the driver could not take control and gets hurt. Who willingly takes responsibility, the driver or the company? Like stated in paragraph 9, to figure this out the country would have to make more laws. All that will waste a large amount of time for both the companies that make driverless cars and congress who makes the laws. Driverless cars will give people trouble before they even hit the road. I believe that driverless cars pose a threat against people and cars should remain in human control at all times. No matter what driverless cars do not have the instinces and emotions as humans. Cars cannot see what lies 500 feet in front of them, only humans can see that. Technology fails too much and letting cars drive for us poses to great of a threat at this time.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Throughout memoir important mood portrayed thankfulness Throughout memoir Narciso shows great thankfulness towards parents gave everything country loved Cuba order kids opportunities better life Also memoir talked parents making best always helping people communitie hoping would return favor needed In neighborhood races together unity despite customs else In parent s struggled personally finecially accept might get jobs deserve kids endure tough times better kids Narciso thanked parents repeatedly love sacrifice reality says way express gratitude Narciso said never forget parents turned simple house home His parents perseverance basis life today taught great lessons",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "I think that people should join the Seagoing Cowboys.It's a good oprotunity to help anamals and people.It would be a great oprotunity to see some of the world and to go over seas.I think most people will enjoy it.It would have a lot of things to do and you will stay bussy and if you have to many things on your mind this will clear it up.It Just like doing community service . All the people who do it have alot in comman to.It would be a good chance to see the world lots of people want to see the world but most can't because they are to bussy doing work well not with this Job you can do the work and see the world at the same time and you can help the community.You also get to inner act with animals and people.So come join us and do The Seagoing Cowboys.Luke would really like some compony.Come ride the waves So come and join us.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Venus is a place in space where astronauts may go to. Venus is has the hottest surface temperture of any planet on the solar system. Venus is the second close planet to the sun because Mercury is the first that is closest to the sun. Venus is sometimes called the Evening Star because it is one of the brightest points of lights in the night sky. Some people may think that that Venus is one of the most dangerous planet in the solar system. On the planet surface tempertures can get up to 800 degrees Fahrenheit. The atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what weve experience in our own planet. Venus has the hottest temperture of all the planets in our solar system. Venus is the hottest even when Mercury is closest to the sun. Some numerous factors have think that Venus is challenging planet for humans to study. Humans have sent numerous spacecrafts to land on the cloud-draped world. Each spacecraft they sent was unmanned. Venus is the dangerous because no spacecraft they sent survived the landing for more than a few few hours. Im assuming this is why not a single spaceship touched down in Venus for more than three decades. NASA is working on other approaches to study Venus. They are running test on the surface because of the chaos that has happened. They are looking back on old technology which was called the mechanical computers. This was evented in the 1800s. The studying that they are having I think that it shouldn't be anymore problems with spacecrafts or anything going to Venus.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "There is currently a contentious argument that using English as an international language will always have more benefits than drawbacks. Despite the use of English, which has been spreading globally, has positive effects on communication in various aspects, I personally believe that the disadvantages of the spread of English will eventually be more significant. It is true that when more and more countries use English as a common language, the advantages of this implementation will outweigh its negative consequences. A classic example of this is that people from any country could communicate to each other in the easier way. This is because there will be no language barrier, preventing people to deliver their messages to others. Furthermore, using English globally tend to have less misunderstanding when communicating. This is exemplified by natives who live in the same country and speak the same language. These people can understand what each other say completely. Therefore, in terms of global perspective, if everyone has conversations in English, misleading communication tend to be less occurred. In spite of the aforementioned positive consequences of the growing use of English, there are also potential drawbacks. A common example of this is the missing of some languages. Languages which are only used by small groups of people tend to fade away due to the fact that the majority of people would pay more attention to English without conserving these languages. In addition, nations that do not apply English as an international language tend to have small global economic growth. This is because most countries in international markets can understand English. Hence, countries whose people are unable to apply English could inevitably have less opportunities to make commercial deals with other countries, having the ability to speak English. In conclusion, it is undeniable that the spread of English positively affects the way people from different countries communicate to each other and significantly decreases inaccurate information in conversations. Nevertheless, as this development can lead to the lost in other languages and the declining economy of some countries, I totally disagree with the notion that the advantages of the increasing popularity of English will continue to outweigh the disadvantages. This is because I personally think that the aforementioned negative impacts are the two most crucial aspects when using English.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The Electoral College basically serves as a filter for the votes of every individual American citizen. Every single vote that comes from citizens is a vote for somebody else who will be voting for the president, not the candidates themselves. The Electoral College is flawed to the point where the most logical way to vote would be to base presidental elections off of popular votes. The Electoral College encourages the presidents who are running for office to avoid campaigning towards states with a smaller amount of electoral voters. If the president is determined by the most electoral votes, it would make sense that the president would campaign towards larger states with more electoral voters such as California, Texas, and Florida. Why would they spend time trying to appeal to some of the smaller states? This can lead to some states not even seeing the candidate. Infact, during the 2000 election, voters in the 25 largest media markets did not witness any campaign advertising. The Electoral College's process of voting suppresses the voice of every citizen. The balance between smaller and larger states comes into play here as well. Take Florida for example, a state with 29 total electoral votes. If the mass majority of Florida votes for a certain set of electors, the minority votes for the other ones would not matter at all, as the electors speaking for that certain fraction of the population would not elected. With popular voting, each and every vote would matter towards electing a president. The number of minority votes would directly apply to the outcome of the president. The Electoral College and the electors should not be the voice of the country. The voice of the people should be heard, especially when it comes to presidental elections. Popular voting is the most fair and rational method of voting. The Electoral College is best off forgotten as a voting system.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "computers benefit society hotly debated topic among citizens town Many argue computers provide quick easy communication help children adults learn even teach balancing habits generation I firmly believe computers necessary society I miss words working overseas two years One ways contact father Communication extremely important society brings families friends closer together Computers provide variety forms communication instant messaging ORGANIZATION allows people called visual phone conversation A tearyeyed says CAPS since wife died daughter companion With I hear voice every day see face It never fails make smile instant messaging also give society fast easy communication others Invitations announcements quick hello done Therefore computers important communication society Have seen look child s face heshe learns something new Computers provide excellent variety education society For example toddlers children use programs CAPS programs teach reading writing speaking children CAPS child used toddler says resident teachers impressed reading writing skills I could nt proud Computers nt teach children teach adults Did know adults learn knowledge environment politics basic information computer Computers needed help people learn society Finally computers teach balance A mom says CAPS teenager learned balance computer life I definitely see connects areas balance well teenagers learn balance computer time also learn balance extracurricular activities school This shows result students actually learn responsibility computers I hope society consider fact computers necessary provide commonication teach education help kids learn balance lose Computers certainly improve society",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Ths technology is has helping the humans by their invention over the time. The software that detect how people are feeling, while they are try to hide their emotions. The system is called the Facial Action Coding Systemis now on variety of industries. It classifien on the basic emotion like happy, surprise, anger, scary, and sad. The computer it structure by a 3-D model of the face to detect their feeling. When you are happy and smile looking on the computer it going to detect, so how has you been. In school, is better and helping in students doing better on their grades so, facing to the screen of your classroom that students if they are boring or just confused on their class. Showing student they don'tlike the class by their teaching. Also students it just wanted it to be an interesant topic on each of their class. It also developing wat to communicate with humans and computers. It help us by recognize the face of our peer, \"For instance, you can probably tell how a friend is feeling simply by the look on her face. Of course, most of us would have troubles actually describing each facial triat conveys happy, worries, etc.\". Just the computer can know the feeling you feel. if we face with an angry face but meanwhile it showing a happy face to us.\"They even indicate the difference between a genuine smile and a forces one\". By identifity a real smile not a fake one its muscle it go the cheek. A fake smile the mouth its stretched sideway Is describe how the computer can detect on a real face or just on a painted face descrbing of the facial movement were. The muscle of the facial is not expresses their emotion, and also can structure of their face with a smile. By feeling other their emotinos it can also us feel it,as just of creating an emotions. Describing a face is can't lie because of their different muscles, is just telling the truth of your self. It just to communicate between humans and computers with their feeling.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Dear man would want people computer day nothing How would feel one getting excrise one using playgrounds parks beachs Everyone sitting home nice new fanny computers When really think much time people spend nothing sitting around would computer solve problem It really This I would say computers People spend much time computers excrise needed everyday makes body wear eyes strained When comes computers everyone wants get one say excrise seems like peoples mind click This happens people really starting spend lots time computers If work computers long period day head home spend time computer whats body helping I like computers I like spending time need get something done sometime nt happen I get I forget time s fun Sometime happens people engaged computer someone talking telling something need noding head like know sayed next time asked got done nt know listening Excrise really important body doenst even got anything nt spend time wasted computers This happens families come home work school jump right computers families getting enough excrise spending time family computers get way Excrise would help keep instead electronics Computers like little robots control mind body sucks life cut It strains eyes makes wrat really dont want lot maybe people spend less time computers time focused families nature weak tired I know lot people want computers banned I think would help lot reasons make families closer bodys focused experience computers help ways comes real life helps really one hope understand I say sort things care health activities would say computers lot help also",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The author Winter Hibiscus concludes story Saeng main character vowing attempt driving test spring hibiscus blooming This way showing reader even story ends Saeng give The author adds thought hibiscus bloom hibiscus symbol strength Saeng The hibiscus flower common home country hibiscus bought reminds everything left behind came Vietnam Saeng trying accept new life style uses hibiscus tool help tougher times After Saeng buys flower vows retake failed drivers test spring comes Spring symbol fresh start Saeng also feels hibiscus make winter Saeng The conclusion story uses lot imagery suggest Saeng strong continue live",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In memoir author creates mood inspires us try hardest mood perseverence The mood perseverence expressed memoir many ways One way stress moved United States lived one bedroom apartment They finally saved enough money able move bedroom apartment In neighborhood family raise much money possible buy food help people need anything water shelter clothing The reason move Cuba begin better life United States never gave day finally enough money live",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\"Driverless cars are coming\" is an article that informs the reader about cars that can drive themselves; but they also yield warnings about these autonomous cars. The thought of driverless cars is fascinating! Since 2009, Google has had cars that could drive by themselves under specific situations. This gives the driver a whole new expirence from what has been expected for years. Yes, drivers still have to stay alert and navigate through various traffic issues, such as driveways, constuction work, accidents, etc., but driving just got a whole lot easier. Automobiles are already on their way! In 2013, BMW announced the development of \"Traffic Jam Assistance\". With this function, drivers don't have to worry about the stop and go, but they can worry more about their destination. GM has also added to the technology. They developed seats that would vibrate when the vehicle is in danger of backing in an object. Now drivers wont have to worry about that blind spot that alwys urks them, because GM has their back. But don't think that this is all fun and games just because the car is driving for you. Manufacturers are also considering using cameras to watch that drivers are remaining focused on the road. Dr. Werner Huber, a BMW project manager driver says this,\" We have to interpret the driving fun in a new way.\" Various manufacturers are hoping to bring in-car entertainment and different information systems that use heads-up displays. So, overall driverless cars are becoming our future. I am completely for this idea. Those of us in the technology era have learned to adapt and this is just another way. People are coming up with new ways to make our lives easier and autonomous cars are just the beginning.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The author supports this idea by giving information how its different from today then on the 1940s. The author is telling the reader on \"paragrahp 7\" to imagine a cell phone or tablet to acid or heat capable of melting tin. Venus is the closest planet to Earth in terms of density and size with the the author wants to say every planet has is own neighbor but they got thier sapce. The author wants to inform the planet Venus has the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system even thought Mercury is closer to our sun. The author claim is why are scientists even discussing further visits to its surface even when Venus still has some features that are analogous to those Earth. NASA has one particularly compelling idea for sending humas to studt Venus. The author is saying on paragraph 8; 'Striving to meet the challenge presented by venus has value, not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also only because of the human curiosity'. The travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovaton.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The idea on studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite of dangers. Venus is a very valuable planet now that we want to know more about it. Venus is avery dangerous planet since we know more facts about it and what it can do if we land on it or be near it.\" Clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus atmosphere \". \" Temeperature average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and the atmospheric ppressure is 90 times greater than what we experience in our planet \". Venus is a very dangerous plant this can kill you thats how dangeruous it is. it would be better if NASA would go to venus or something and check what other information they can get about it. \" NASA'S possible solution to the hostile conditions on the surface of Venus would allow scientist to float above the fray \". NASA found this solution on getting more information but its a true risk on doing that. Other aproaches to study venus is the future. I say it is the future because if NASA gets to study more about it we can find ways on landing on Venus without getting injured or killed. \" Another project is looking back to an old technology called mechanical computers. These devices were first envisioned in the 1800s and played an important role in the 1940s during World War ll\". A machine that can get to venus is and option on studying Venus. Us the people we have lots of curiosity on everything, and NASA wants to know more about Venus . Our knoledge on getting to know venus is gonna come in handy we can figure something out on getting to Venus without tragedy .",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Would you participate in the Seagoing Cowboys progam? I would so I can visit many places and take adventures. It seems really fun to go to Europ, China, or anywhere else he goes. It just seems really exciting to go journeys and adventures with friends, and explore the outside world. In the passage it says \"It took about two weeks to cross the Atlantic Ocean from the eastern coast of the United States and a month to get to China.\" To me i don't think i would be able to stay on a boat for two weeks and a month its jsut alot of sitting down, and you dont get any rest. Its alot to do when your travling for two weeks and a month. My argument about Luke's point of view is that it would seem pretty cool to sail and go on journeys with Luke. He seems like a person who would love people to come along with him on his jouneys and help him explore new things, and keep watch for things, animals, and maybe people. Luke just seems like a very active person who loves people to help him explore. I think this because he's very very active and he likes to explore. He enjoys his doing what he does if he can travel for more than two weeks. If he can explore and help out . That really shows that he loves his job.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "A beaker bubbled lab I could smell sulfur smell wafting beaker CAPS whats going I yelped across room CAPS found cure cancer said little jublee dance showed I doctor I wasnt sure I told I patient extreme brain cancer CAPSs go try screamed As I zoomed car waited packed lab equiptment After minutes I pondering could hard time packing I said So I turned radio fell asleep After couple hours I woke shock I sleeping hours I rushed inside find holding ball fur wrapped lab coat I saved kittens life cure cancer said breath I glad I patient kitten would lived Just I thinking nice saved kitten pager dinged lady extreme brain cancer needed help got one vial cancer solution rushed hospital There I saw laying translucent light hitting paper I quickly got heart rate At moment I wasnt sure would live CAPS give mad scientist asked I made risky choice CAPS yet I waited five minutes poured came back life Even though couldnt talk I could tell smile thankful I patient Her daughter walked room said CAPS you I smiled back",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The features setting affect cyclist old timers advice get Than town told go ghost town After keep going place told get water old rusty pumped gaid tar came Than made way dessert way snake came road go around So never take advice old timers",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In this article they say the dangers of going on venus. they make it to where it is suitable for people to go on they make it to where theyre standing and floating 30 miles in the air . the pressure makes it harder for it to be liveable and the heat . They say its like taking an electronic on a machine chamber and letting it go and get heated and melt. venus has the hottest surface tempeture of any planet because its closer to the sun.they orbit the sun at different speeds which is why density is so high on venus. Humans have sent numerous spacecrafts to land on venus. it didnt seem to work out but they sent humans there and tried to make it live able for them . The humans studied the planet and tried to get it to where it is most comfortable for people to go. they cant send electro devices because it will only damage them. They put them 30 miles in the air so that they wont feel the heat and presure against their bodies. this is the best suitable way for them to make it on the planet venus.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Mona Lisa, she's 83 percent happy, 9 percent disgusted, 6 percent fearful, and 2 percent angry. At least according to some new computer software that can recognize emotions. Thomas Huang, the beckman institute for advanced science at the University of Illinois, working in collaboration of the Unversity of Amsterdam and his colleague are experts at developing better way for human and computer to communicate to each person or online. For computer can use homework research to recognize the subtle facial movement the human use to express how they feel about the computer's using in it. The fact, they perform this same impressive for calculation for every day. Most of them would have trouble their issue of describing each facial trait that conveys happy, worried and etc. The Mona Lisa demonstration is really intended to bring a big smile to your face. By the way, making you happy face in this experiment also make you feel slightly happy to your face. Making faces could be reveal so they have a much of the science of emotions.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Education is the backbone for any nations development. While some people feel that cultural arts subject teaching to be made mandatory for juveniles during their schooling, others think it is an absolute waste of time. In this essay, I will discuss both views and provide examples with reasons to support why the former one is better for society. The supporters who think that learning arts are not required in this contemporary world have a reason to say so. To be more precise, they feel that the aforementioned subject does not have any exciting future with alluring monetary benefits. As per the world statistics, for instance, the ratio of the public who have chosen the above-stated career and the success rate of those artists is really negligible. Thus, people have made up their minds to encourage children to develop knowledge in the science and technological streams to reach heights in their careers and life. On the other hand, others, including me, have stronger evidence to prove that the above-discussed thought process is wrong. Learning arts and showcasing it to the world represents the culture of the respective nation, which eventually elevate the country to the top position among the global countries. To cite an example, India is respected across the globe because of its culture of encouraging the various art forms such as dance, painting and drawing as critical skills to learn. In addition to that, India has been introducing special monetary packages and conducting more art exhibitions to promote artists. To conclude, only a few people are under impression that arts to be taught as an essential subject during children schooling. However, others think it is unnecessary to learn which consumes a large amount of time. I honestly feel that every country should treat art learning as a critical aspect as it not only to represents the culture but also increase the cognitive ability of children to a greater extent.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Authors that present a well-developed, convincing argument can have a large influence on their reader's thoughts. In the passage, \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus,\" the author explains the different reasons as to why Earth, as a whole, should further study the planet of Venus, alotting all its difficulties. While the kinks of being able to go to Venus are still being worked out, this author gives insight as to why this barren planet is still important. The first idea the author had was related to the atmosphere of Venus. \"A thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets Venus. Even more challenging are the coulds of higly corrosive sufuric acid in Venus's atmosphere.\" In Paragraph 3, the author does not give a higly convincing argument. Humans need oxygen to live, so how is it expected for them to survive on a planet that has little to no oxygen? It is not possible to change the chemical makeup of an entire planet. The argument displayed by the author is not credible in any way and does not give any reason as to why one would want to continure research in this area. The next problem that Earth faces in studying Venus is that temperatures on this planet exceed 800 degrees Fahrenheit, a temperature found nowhere on Earth. This temperature is beyond the maximun limit that human can edure, which leaves behind the compelling factor of wanting to study more of this sister planet. The author also states, \". . . and the atmospheric pressure is 9 times greater than what we experience on our own planet. These conditions are far more extreme that anything humans encounter on Earth.\" If the conditions of Venus are so bad, why should we be expected to study more of this planet. Similar to the carbon dioxide in the air, there is no way to change the temperature and pressure of an entire planet. Once again, the argument given by this author is not convincing. The author uses an idea proposed by NASA for humans to study Venus. They say that they could use hovering vehcles such as a blimp to fly over the planet, somewhere around 30 miles high. While 30 miles is a long way abover the planet, the temperature would still be around 170 degrees Fahrenheit, which is not ideal for reseachers. \"Not easy conditions, but survivable for humans.\" If studying a planet is as difficult as the author is saying here, then Venus should be abandoned because even if NASA was able to study it, there is obviously no way that the planet will ever be suitable to live on. The author's arguments so far have all been a lost cause. The author does explain that Venus may have been previously similar to Earth-like conditions, including oceans to support forms of life. He states that it has similar features to Earth such as valleys, mountains, and craters. While this may be too, Venus has come a long way in that it is no longer able to sustain life. Even if it previously was similar to Earth, that means that it has gotten worse over time, which says that from here on, it will continue to grow worse. Proven by the author, Venus's conditions are far too extreme for the technology we have today. This planet is increasingly too dangerous to be explored, therefore the research toward it should be abandoned, and pushed more toward studying other plants, or even other solar systems in order to find another sutiable planet for humans to comfortably live on.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Nowadays, the number of people who are interesting history of their accommodations has increased. I believe that it is about curious thought in humanβs instinct. While, to get to know information about origin or history about our place by asking the elders, and also by the pictures that they took in the past, which can be discussed in the following paragraphs before the conclusions are reached. First of all, the main point is those people get attracted by the story of their own house because they are curious. There are many historical places that had been debris in this present, which does make archaeologists interest to find artefacts and backstories of the place. In addition, Archaeologists can analyze and combine crucial information to give other people know more about the place such as the previous owners of the place or what is this building looks like in the past. Meanwhile, citizens can find the data to discover about the building by asked seniors who live in the house or the elderly who live in the same neighbourhoods. They can cover up your question because they have seen everything change around them, and also the elders have pictures that they took before as proof that the house had been changed or renovated. For example, I found an old picture of my house that explained to me what was it looks like in decades such as the pond in front of the house has been replaced by the big garage and it remains there ever since. In conclusion, people have versatile questions about the history of the places because they are just curious by instinct, and can research the answers about the house or building by turning to the senior residents and proofs such as artefacts or photos.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In story No Not Exceed Posted Speed Limit Joe Kurmaskie I believe setting greatly affect cyclist I believe its long downhill cool roads fine straight uphill roads extremely hot feels like cant keep pedaling The cyclist gets weary setting hot desert one around setting huge affect mood story Another example",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "I think that the Face is just a oddly shaped rock, it probably just got there from sandy winds and erotion taking place on a mesa and that is what made it to be like that from, from my experience with the Bible it says there is nothing else in the universe to do harm to the earth, except for sin and satin. The Lord thy God will never but something like that in the universe to do us harm. From th excerpt it says that at that time it was a windy mounth on Mars and from that I think that it got there from erosion, for atleast a couple hundred years it would had to be wearing away, because that huge of a rock can not possibly get worn away that fast but i guess since we found it like this a rock on Mars in the Crydonia and some how it lookes like a face, and over to the next century it would probably change and look like somthing else a new shape it would not stay like that for long. But it would be a cool conspicury to think that aliens make a cool looking rock formation of a Egyphian Pharoah known as the Face. Also from the excerpt says that it a a butte or a mesa that got eroded away over time, and also if there was a alien life form on Mars we could see it because we have this high packed pixle camera that can take a photo of Mars and we can see them and there homes on our monitors the camera is called the Mars Global Suveryor an dby the intension of that shuddle we can see all things big or small.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "There has been an argument saying that the face on mars is a ancient civilization. Well they are wrong because it is an old landform. My three reasons of why it is a landform is because the planet Mars cannot support life. Also because it is just the lighting forming the eyes nose and the mouth and it is just a landform. I know it is a landform that has just eroded over hundreds of years. On Mars there is no oxygen no water or life that is because the planet cannot support life. The planet is compleltly dead. If there was a civlization then they would of had to of built a house with airlocks just to survive. Even if the Aliens did not need air to breath they would have gotten to hot and they need mosture to survive. And you would think that we would have found a civilization or something that would have kept them alive by now. In the text it says it would be cool if there was an ancient civilization. The landform looks like it has eyes a nose and a mouth but really it is just the lighting reflecting on the landform. If the sun is hitting the landform then it will cause a shadow to creat the look of eyes a nose and a mouth. But after many years the landform has eroded to form a face like look. Sense the planet Mars has allways been the closest to the sun. It is alot hotter than earth so there is allways heat waves so that is what caused the erosen on the landform. In the text it states that the eyes nose and mouth are just an illusion. This is a landform because the planet is completly dead. Mars cannot support life because it is too hot and it gets heat waves. Also the light refelects off the landform and creats a shadow of eyes a nose and a mouth. The landform has had many years to erode. In the text it states it is just a martian mesa common enough around Cydonia. Only this one had unusual shadows that made it look like an Egyptian Pharaoh. It would be cool if there was aliens that created the landform. We could see how they adapted to surviving on the planet and its harsh conditions. They might help us addapt to Mars and we can help them adapt to our planet. But NASA would become more famous than what it is today. Because they would want to have all the land marks for artifacts and it would probably make the aliens mad. The landform on Mars was not created by aliens because we would have known by now. Also because Mars cannot support life the lighting on the planet creats the eyes the nose and the mouth like a illusion. And for all we know it is just a landform. I know it is just a landform that has eroded over hundreds of years.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Dear Local Newspaper Have ever thought computers effect human beings The impacts The results The education I believe computers positive effect people Computers allow people talk others online ability educate certain areas teach handeye coordination Who says way contact communicate someone letters phone The technology brought upon using computers allows people talk online others fast easy enjoyable way Have question ask friend someone else using phone Write letter Oh wait letters take todays question urgent The computer easy alternative communication Say re amazing singer beautiful voice want find agent anything Computers advanced technology find agent time Email websites ways contact agent Computers great way communicate The mind extrordinary thing It filled knowledge still ability learn understand Reading books fantastic way learn internet much offer reading one great author tons great authors The computer allows learn far away places important people without making trip library Have ever heard online colleges They advertised time Some people think learning home laying bed laptop placed front distractive way learn But comfortable intiminated anyone else around Computers help get college degree comfortable environment Handeye coordinatin excellet wonderful thing Along videogames computer games teach exactly Parents think kids wasting time playing games computer actually challenging minds handeye coordinatin ability Computers key comes pysicological learing Handeye coordinatin taught us games play without us even knowing Handeye coordination allows us catch ball play sports computers help us acheive",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "I think that the development of these cars is a good idea and I say this because in the story it says \"The cars he foresees would use half the fuel of today's taxis and offer far more flexibility than a bus\" and there is more to come with this car .A reason why I think this is a good idea is because Google has had cars that could drive independently under specific conditions since 2009 and they also said in the story that their cars have driven more than half a million miles without a crash.These cars are very safe but they aren't completely driverless because the car alerts when the driver needs to take over like when you are pulling in and out of driveways or having something to do with complicated traffic issues.These driveless cars can steer,accelerate,and brake themselves, but all are designed to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skills navigating through work zones and around accidents.The GM has developed driver's seats to vibrate whn the vehicle is in danger of backing into a object but the Google car simply announces when the diver should be prepared to take over.The reasons they are making these cars are to keep drivers, passengers, and pedestrians safe.The Automakers are continuing their work on the assumption and the problems they have now will be solved.I believe that the road for these driverless cars stretches on ahead of them because u have to work hard for what you want and that exactly what they are doing. I believe these driveless cars are going to be come a very big deal and everyone will be willing to buy one.So if you ask me if the development of these cars are an good idea I would say it's an good idea.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Whether employees' social skills are more essential than their academic knowledge is one of the recurrently discussed matters nowadays. It is indubitable that both qualities are vital in a field of work. However, which is more crucial has no absolute agreement. This dissertation will take both sides into consideration and conclude. Firstly, a frequently held consensus is the fact that sociable people should be highly valued in a job sphere. The reasoning for this is that communicating with other individuals tends to be tough. In a place of employment where the goal is to advertise and sell a product, the salesman has to be charismatic in order to win the customer over. For instance, in a clothing boutique, the seller has to persuade the buyer that all the clothes are fashionable and in trend. In some cases, the consumer is not easily convinced. Although, if the worker is confident enough, it would likely be a major success. On the other hand, jobs such as computer science, chemical engineering, business management and etc usually require academic qualifications. A person without the necessary education for the formerly mentioned employments will not be granted any position in them. Therefore, a proportion of the general public contends that employers ought to favour the intelligent when it comes to an occupation. To summarize by taking everything stated into account, the importance of each quality solely depends on the designated work. There is no doubt that humanitarian jobs prefer individuals who are prone to interacting with others, while scientific ones opt for the academically blessed.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The creation of the Facial Action Coding System has the potential to be very innovative and useful in today's society. In schools, teachers often have difficulty obtaining the attention of students and maintaining it when they have it. This could be a result of the way they are teaching, and how it makes the students feel. The use of FACS in all classrooms would be found valuable. Problems such as obtaining attention could easily be solved with the use of the FACS. If students are placed in a classroom, and are unhappy and bored, they are less likely to pay attention and learn at the rate they are capable of. The FACS can record these students' emotions and help change the method of teaching used in that class to interest the students. As stated in the passage by Dr. Huang, \"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored.\" This could potentially change the students attitude towards learning for the better. A teacher is capable of understanding verbal communication better than that which is nonverbal. Unless a student tells their teacher he or she is confused or bored, the teacher has little to no way of knowing this. Dr. Huang states, \"Most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication.\" The FACS is able to detect such forms of emotion, and make corrections based upon them. This process makes the FACS more capable of dealing with these situations than any teacher. Emotion is displayed often through facial expressions. Certain muscles in your face respond to specific emotions you are feeling at the time. It is not uncommon for a student to put on a fake smille or expression of understanding towards a teacher when he or she is bored and could care less. A teacher may have some difficulty understanding if the student's emotions are real or fake. Luckily the FACS recieves data from the recognition of movement in muscle tissues. The FACS is programmed to recognize which muscles move during each emotion. To provide an example the author explains, \"But in false smiles, the mouth is stretched sideways using the zygomatic major and a different muscle, the risorius.\" SInce a different muscle is used in fake smiling than in that which is real, the FACS can tell the difference between the two expressions with ease. The facts about FACS suggest that it is a perfect candidate for the use of innovative technology in the classroom. This system can improve the learning rates, as well as the mental growth of the students in a classroom. FACS can easily be proven valuable in all classrooms, as well as in many other environments among modern society. FACS proves that the use of technology to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom is valuable.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\"Driverless Cars\" has alot of postive things about it but also negative as well. Thier cars have driven half a million miles without a crash, but so far, Google cars aren't all so driveless; they still alert the driver to take over when pulling in and out of driveways or dealing with complicated traffic issues, such as nevigating through roadwork or accidents. But my thing about this is that its not always safe to have just your car do the work i mean yeah it will prevent car accidents but its not normal. Further improvements in senors and computer hardware and software to make driving safer are also leading to cars that can handle more and more on their own. I just think it would be weird if my car would drive on it's own I mean yeah its cool but who would want that its just going to make this world more and more lazyier. I think that the world is adding a little to much to our lives like seriously I think we should stay the way we are wat next are they go start making floating cars and doors u can jus walk up to and say open and it will. Driverless cars is doing nothing but helping this world get even more lazyier.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "I am for the development of smart/driverless cars. I have chosen to support these cars because they will use half the fuel of today's taxis and offer more flexibility than a bus, they can sense the road and dangers better, and the cars require little human attention. Firstly, the cars will potentially replace taxi services. I think this will be a great idea because while you would still have to pay for the service, there is no human element of error. If there is an element of error, however, you will be the one at fault because you are the only passenger and driver. I believe the replacement of the traditional taxi service is a good thing. The smart cars are good at sensing dangers on the road ahead. Because the cars have technology that can even start to turn on the brakes before the driver can, the driver will be safer and does not have to respond as quickly. The \"Traffic Jam Assistant\" is a good development because the driver must still remain alert but the car does most of the work. Lastly, I think the smart cars are a good idea to develop because they allow the driver to be safe in a vehicle that they are not in full control of. A project manager driver from BMW, Werner Huber states, \"We have to interpret the driving in a fun new way.\" I think that if the developers of the smart car add a type of entertainment to help the passenger stay interested, then the driver will still be alert. I believe the development of the smart car is a good idea because people will not have to take a taxi anymore, the smart cars are more reliable, and the smart cars will require less attention from the driver. I believe that the smart cars will do a good job on the road and that there are very few risks if they are tested correctly.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "First,Professor. Thomas Huang of the beckman Institute for advanced Science at the University of Illinois working with Professor. Nicu Sebe of the University of Amsterdam. Dr. Huang and his colleague are developing better ways for humans and computers to communicate which the proces begin when a computer constructs a 3-D computer Model of the Human face that contains all 44 major muscles in the model that must move like Human. Second,The Facial Expressions of some individuals often show varying degrees of expression and the new emotion-recognition software tracks facial movements in a real face or in the painted face if Mona Lisa. Each expression of a Human is being compared against a neutral face (showing no emotion). In fact us Humans perform the same impressive \"calculation\" everyday. Third,Mona Lisa's Demonstration really intended to bring a smile on your face, For example: if you smile when a Web ad appears on your screen a similar ad will follow but if your frown the next ad will be different,which makes the classroom computer recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored then it could modify the lesson like an effective human instructor and with the same technology it can be used to make computer-animated faces more expressive for video games or video surgery. Last,Our Muscles called Orbicularis oculi pars palpabraeus make crow's feet around your eyes, in a false smile the mouth is stretched sideways using the zygomatic major and a different muscle, the risorious. But, to an expert faces don't lie; the muscle clues are sometimes used to spot when a smiling politician or celebrity isn't being truthful. In Conclusion, The Theory of Emotion is about moving your facial muscles not only expresses emotions,but it also may help produce them, And empathy may happen at some point of time when we unconsciously imitate another person's facial expressions.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 0.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The mood author story happy sad Happy grateful parents like diddoes sad childhood nt great family made happy made seem like home family",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Based excerpt The Mooring Mast written Marcia Amidon Lsted builders Empire State building faced many obsticles attempting allow dirigibles dock One main problem architects could drop mooring mast top Empire State building s flat roof There needed modifications made make safe dirigible land The biggest obstacle nature Lsted said best paragraph The winds top building constantly shifting due violent currents Even dirigible tethered mooring mast back ship would swivel around around mooring mast The final problem builders faced even manage figure way put mooring mast still law stating dirigibles illegal land Lsted said paragraph This law would make illegal ship ever tie building even approach area Obviously examples given builders Empire State building faced many obstacles attempting allow dirigibles dock",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "In many countries around the world, boys and girls are educated together. There is a group of countries, however, that educate boys and girls separately. This is frequently done on religious grounds, but not always. Having such a system can produce various advantages and disadvantages.One of the principal reasons for educating boys and girls separately is that, if they are together, they can distract each other. After puberty, boys can be strongly attracted to girls and vice versa, and this can result in disruptive conduct in the classroom as, for example, they show off to one another. Separating boys and girls can therefore have the distinct advantage of reducing this disturbing behaviour. However, some teachers have pointed out that this model does not always work, and that separated boys and girls are equally disruptive in class, and sometimes more so. These teachers say that having the opposite sex in the classroom can actually improve behaviour.Many educators also believe that boys and girls have different learning styles and needs. Separating boys and girls can allow teachers to address these needs more easily. There is also a belief that single sex schools allow gender stereotypes to be challenged and therefore education aspirations can be broadened.A major disadvantage of separating boys and girls in education is that the children miss important formative behavioural development when they do not have interaction with the other gender on a regular basis. This can lead to shyness and, more seriously, dysfunctional relationships later in life. Some people also feel that mixed sex schools can promote gender stereotypes rather than reducing them.In conclusion, I feel that children should be educated all together, although I would respect a system in which they are separated due to religious beliefs. My personal opinion is that different genders should learn to interact together from an early age, as this would allow them to develop healthy working relationships with each other.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "It first day sophomore year I moved I nervous new school like kid would I walked school checked surroundings Everything seemed normal enough I saw Near middle sea tables cafeteria four tables around people one CAPS fact caught attention They dueling cards right middle cafeteria could see I baffled I mean I used duel I younger elementary school game newer I quit cause everyone school stopped dueling I looking least highschoolers dueling away What surprised right open everyone could see worst judge I moved table nearby began watch kid named later become one best friends mop floor opponent I quickly caught back rules went home day thinking I m gon na get back game So I bought deck continued recon tables deck sitting front waiting someone challenge s master A days went I continued silent observation duelists Finally duelist named another one good friends challenged I accepted began He proceeded thoroughly kick butt space seemed like five rounds game taught play better became best friends He really funny guy day I cant hang around without laughing Through I met tons great friends Even I wonder high school life would like CAPS attend new school",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "narciso Rodriguez clothing designer wrote memoir Home The blueprints lives The mood created memoir warm feeling surrounds meaning family homenarciso says memoir Passionate Cuban music filled air mixing Aromas kitchen Here innocence childhood congregation family friends endless celebrations encompassed formed back drop lif warm home That proves narcisos house warm family home alway welcamingnarcisos comunity also close like family In proves saying Close knit community hones hard working imigrants extent hand people clearly need He also states blood doesnt mean family Like surrogate grandparents In proves parents alway welcoming My parents always kept arms door open many people concidered family knowing would us",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "The mood creat author love It love discribed house The passionate cuban music fill air mixing aromas kitchen Cooking music usally associate love love happiness The author also talks closeknit community honest hard working immigrants extanded hand people necessarily kind clearly need This also shows mood memore love love cooking music family Another place showed love memore quote My Parents always kept arms door open many people considered family knowing would us This shows love even though people nt blood related still look knew someone lean The apparent mood story love family much",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances. Given essays are evaluated according to the following criteria: content relevance and development, vocabulary usage and appropriateness, grammar correctness and sentence completeness, as well as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization accuracy. Do not change any of the instructions above. Append-only rules below define how to compute the single numeric score. Scoring rubric (four dimensions, each 0β25, total 0β100): Content (0β25): 25=all required/relevant items fully covered with detailed support; 20=most relevant items covered with some detail; 15=some relevant items covered with limited development; 10=few relevant items with minimal development; 5=mostly off-topic; 0=no relevant content. Vocabulary (0β25): 25=excellent appropriate range, uses β₯10 target words if a list is provided; 20=good, 8β9 words; 15=adequate but repetitive, 5β7 words; 10=limited with some misuse, 3β4 words; 5=very limited, 1β2 words; 0=inappropriate/0 words. If no target list, ignore numeric counts and judge appropriateness/range. Grammar (0β25): 25=all sentences complete, target structures correct, 0β3 mistakes; 20=most sentences complete, 4β5 mistakes; 15=some incomplete sentences, 6β7 mistakes; 10=several incomplete, 8β9 mistakes; 5=many incomplete, 10β12 mistakes; 0=most incomplete, >12 mistakes. If no target structures given, judge accuracy/complexity only. Spelling/Punctuation/Capitalization (0β25): 25=0β3 errors; 20=4β5; 15=6β7; 10=8β9; 5=10β12; 0=>12. Computation: (1) assign each dimension a banded score (0,5,10,15,20,25); (2) sum for Total_100; (3) convert to 0β5 integer overall by rounding Total_100/20 (clamp 0β5 if needed); (4) output exactly one line in the required format with that integer. Edge cases: empty/off-topic essays β Content=0; ignore absent vocab/structure targets; count each unique error, repeated typos count each time; if borderline between bands, choose the stricter (lower). Remember: you must not output anything except the single required line and integer per the original instruction.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Venus is the closet planet to the sun. Although Venus is distant and safe vantage point of Earth, it is a challenging planet for humans to study. The author suggests that studying Venus is worth exploring but its dangerous. Venus has dangerous conditions and extreme tempretures Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it is the most earth like planet in our solar system. The text states \"Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth.\" This quote shows how Venus has earth features and scientists want to learn more. Venus has extreme tempretures which make it difficult for scientist to get information. The text states \"therefore, scientists seeking to conduct a thorough mission to understand Venus would need to get up close and personal despite the risks\". This quotes explains how Venus is worth exploring despite the risks. In conclusion, Venus is worthy studying despite the risks. Earth and beyonds shoulds not be limited by dangers. Curiosity can lead us to new things.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Your evaluation score is: 1.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.