Dataset Viewer
source_dataset
stringclasses 1
value | category
stringclasses 4
values | input_image
imagewidth (px) 119
3k
| edit_instruction
stringlengths 18
475
| output_reasoning_text
stringlengths 222
1.63k
| output_image
imagewidth (px) 512
1.02k
| score
int64 1
5
| reasoning
stringlengths 646
1.76k
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after being kept in a daily environment for a year.
|
<think>
The question involves depicting the transformation of bananas over a year in a typical household environment. The question_image shows fresh, ripe bananas, while the question_text asks to visualize their state after a year.
To approach this, I consider the natural aging process of bananas. Over time, they typically turn from yellow to brown as they ripen and eventually spoil. The texture changes from smooth and firm to wrinkled and soft, and the color shifts from bright yellow to various shades of brown. Additionally, any spots or bruises may become more pronounced, and the overall appearance becomes less appealing.
The answer_image should reflect this progression, showing bananas that are significantly overripe and possibly starting to rot. The texture should appear soft and wrinkled, with brown spots and discoloration dominating the skin. The environment should still resemble a typical household, with elements like a kitchen or dining table to maintain context.
This reasoning ensures the answer image aligns with the user's request for a realistic depiction of bananas after a year in a daily environment.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the bananas appear fresh, bright yellow, with only minor brown spots and an overall firm texture. In Image B, the bananas are heavily discolored, with extensive black and brown spots, patches of mold or severe bruising, and a generally shriveled, aged appearance. The stems are also darker and more shriveled compared to Image A. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After being kept in a daily environment for a year, bananas should look severely decomposed, with significant browning or blackening, possible mold, shriveling, and an overall rotten appearance, indicating the passage of a long period. 3. Instruction Match: The observed differences match the expected results of a banana left out for a year. The bananas in Image B look old, rotten, and decomposed, accurately reflecting the instruction. The core object is unchanged (still bananas), and the changes are appropriately applied to the correct attributes (color, texture, form). 4. Decision: The edit precisely fulfills the instruction with all required changes present, so this is rated 5 for perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like ten years later.
|
<think>
The question_image shows a young plant emerging from the soil, symbolizing growth and potential. The question_text asks to visualize what this plant will look like after ten years, implying a transformation into a mature tree.
To reason about the answer, I consider the natural progression of a tree's development. The young plant in the image likely represents a sapling, and after ten years, it would grow into a full-fledged tree with a thick trunk, a robust canopy, and possibly sprawling branches.
The answer_image should depict a mature tree, emphasizing its height, full foliage, and a strong, sturdy trunk. The setting might include a natural environment like a forest or a park, with surrounding elements such as other trees, grass, and a serene atmosphere. Details like sunlight filtering through the leaves or a clear sky could enhance the visual appeal and convey the passage of time.
The answer_text would describe the tree's growth and maturity, highlighting its transformation from a sapling to a full-grown tree. This aligns with the user's request to visualize the plant's future state after ten years.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: Image A shows a young sapling with a thin stem and a few leaves, close to the ground. Image B depicts a fully grown, mature tree with a thick trunk, widespread branches, and a dense canopy, situated in a field. 2. Expected Visual Caption: If the instruction 'Draw what it will look like ten years later' is followed, the edited image should show the sapling as a mature tree, significantly larger, with a thick trunk and extensive branches, representing ten years of growth. 3. Instruction Match: The transformation between the two images matches the instruction exactly—the sapling becomes a large, mature tree, which is the logical and visually expected result of ten years of growth. The correct object (the plant) is maintained, and the requested attribute (age, size, maturity) is accurately modified. 4. Decision: The edit completely fulfills the instruction with no omissions or inaccuracies, deserving a perfect score.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after three years.
|
<think>
The question image shows a young puppy with a light brown and white coat, sitting on grass. The question_text asks to visualize what this puppy will look like after three years, implying a transformation into a fully grown adult dog.
To reason about the answer, I consider the physical changes a puppy undergoes in three years. The puppy's coat will likely become more defined and mature, with a richer shade of brown and possibly a darker tone. Its size will increase significantly, and the body structure will become more robust and adult-like. The ears may stand taller or develop a more defined shape, and the face will show more maturity.
The answer image should depict a fully grown dog with a similar coat pattern but a larger, more muscular build. The grassy background remains consistent to maintain continuity between the puppy and adult stages. The adult dog should appear confident and poised, reflecting the transformation from a young puppy to a mature adult.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the dog is small with a more compact, puppy-like body, softer fur texture, and slightly rounder proportions. In Image B, the dog appears larger, with a longer body and legs, more defined musculature, and a more mature posture. The fur looks sleeker and the dog's proportions are more mature. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After three years, the dog should appear as an adult, with increased size, more developed body structure, less fluffy fur, and a distinctly grown appearance compared to a puppy. 3. Instruction Match: The changes observed in Image B match the instruction to show what the dog would look like after three years. The correct subject (the same dog) is presented, and the transition from puppy to adult is appropriately depicted in size, posture, body proportions, and fur texture. 4. Decision: The edit precisely fulfills the instruction, so the score is 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what he will look like after exercising for a year.
|
<think>
To address the request, I first analyze the question_image, which shows a person with a heavy build, minimal muscle definition, and a tattoo on the left arm. The question_text asks for a depiction of the person after exercising for a year, implying a transformation into a leaner, more muscular physique.
I imagine the final answer_image would feature a significant reduction in body fat, highlighting defined muscle groups such as the chest, arms, and abdomen. The tattoo on the left arm would remain unchanged, ensuring continuity with the original image. The person's posture might appear more upright and confident, reflecting the positive effects of exercise.
To create the answer_text, I would describe the transformation, emphasizing the leaner physique, visible muscle tone, and overall improvement. The answer_image would likely show the person in a similar pose but with a visibly toned and athletic appearance, aligning with the request for a transformation after a year of exercise.
</think>
| 1
|
1. Detect Difference: The only notable difference between Image A and Image B is a significant reduction in image quality, with increased pixelation and loss of detail. The person's body shape, size, posture, and clothing are unchanged. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the same person after a year of exercising, which would typically involve visible changes such as weight loss, increased muscle definition, and a generally fitter appearance. 3. Instruction Match: The instruction specifically calls for a transformation in physical appearance due to exercise over a year. No such transformation is present; the edit does not alter the person's physique or indicate any improvement in fitness. 4. Decision: The instruction is not followed at all—no intended body transformation is present—so this is a clear case of non-compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what she will look like after a year without cutting her hair.
|
<think>
To address the request, I focus on the transformation of her hairstyle over a year. The original hairstyle is short and wavy, with a layered cut. Based on the question text, the goal is to visualize how her hair might look after a year without cutting it. This implies growth and changes in texture, volume, and length.
The answer image should depict longer hair, potentially reaching shoulder length or slightly below. The texture might appear fuller or thicker, with more volume, especially around the ends. The color remains consistent with the original, maintaining the blonde tone. The styling could be slightly tousled or styled in a way that complements the length, such as loose waves or a natural, effortless look.
The final image should emphasize the natural progression of her hair over time, showing the lengthened and fuller appearance while keeping the hairstyle recognizable as the same person. This aligns with the user's request for a transformation.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: The hair in Image A is short, styled in a bob cut just above the shoulders. In Image B, the hair is significantly longer, extending well past the shoulders, and appears fuller and more voluminous, while retaining a similar color and texture. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the same individual with hair that has grown out for a year without being cut—substantially longer, possibly reaching below the shoulders, with a natural, untrimmed look. 3. Instruction Match: The correct object (hair) was modified by increasing its length, precisely as would be expected after a year of growth without cutting. The transformation is naturalistic, and all visual cues point to growth rather than replacement or restyling. 4. Decision: The edit exactly fulfills the instruction, with accurate and realistic hair lengthening, so this is a 5 for perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after being placed outdoors for ten year.
|
<think>
To reason through the transformation, I observe that the question_image depicts a vintage iron with a wooden handle and metallic base, showing signs of wear and age. The user wants to visualize what this object would look like after being exposed to the outdoors for ten years.
Considering the aging process, the metal would likely develop significant rust and patina, while the wooden handle would deteriorate and crack. The surface of the iron would become rough and uneven, with patches of corrosion and discoloration. The wooden handle might splinter or rot, losing its original smooth finish.
The answer image would need to reflect these changes, showing the iron with a heavily rusted metallic base and a weathered wooden handle. The texture would appear rough and uneven, with visible signs of decay. The background might include elements like dirt, grass, or other outdoor debris to emphasize the passage of time and exposure to the elements. This transformation aligns with the user's request for a realistic depiction of aging outdoors.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the iron appears clean, with only minor surface imperfections and no significant weathering. The background is indoors on a wooden surface. In Image B, the iron is outdoors, sitting on soil with grass, and shows substantial rust and corrosion on the metal, with the wooden handle also displaying weathering and darkened spots. 2. Expected Visual Caption: If the iron had been placed outdoors for ten years, it should exhibit significant rust and corrosion, possible discoloration or damage to the wood, and the scene should be outdoors, possibly on earth or grass. 3. Instruction Match: The correct object (the same iron) is present; the requested attributes (outdoor placement, long-term weathering such as rust and wood damage) are all depicted. The degree of modification is accurate: the rust and decay are extensive, matching the ten-year timeline. 4. Decision: Every aspect of the instruction has been followed with precision; thus, this is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what this species look like more than two million years ago.
|
<think>
To address the request, I observe the modern human traits in the question image, such as facial structure, hair style, and tattoos. The task is to imagine what this species would look like two million years ago.
Considering evolutionary trends, I would focus on a more primitive appearance, such as a more robust jawline, minimal or no tattoos, and a hairstyle that reflects ancient human characteristics. The answer image would depict a prehistoric human with a more rugged and natural look, possibly with a beard and a hairstyle that aligns with early human evolution.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image B, the modern appearance of the subject is transformed into a more ancient, archaic form: the subject is now shirtless, the skin is more rugged and weathered, the body is hairier, and anatomical features such as collarbones and musculature are more pronounced and less modern in aspect. The hairstyle and overall body posture also reflect a more primitive look compared to Image A, which features modern clothing and tattoos. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should depict the same species (human) as it might have appeared over two million years ago, with ancestral, prehistoric anatomical features—more body hair, lack of modern clothing or accessories, and a generally primitive, robust build. 3. Instruction Match: The changes made in Image B align closely with expectations for a depiction of an early human: all modern markers are removed, and features consistent with ancient hominins are added. 4. Decision: The transformation is comprehensive and accurately fulfills the instruction, so this is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like one hour later.
|
<think>
The question_image shows a smartphone plugged into a wall socket, with its battery indicator showing a low charge. The question_text asks to visualize the state of the phone one hour later, implying the need to show the battery charging progress over time.
To generate the answer, I consider that the battery will likely increase in charge level as it receives power. The answer_image should depict the phone with a battery indicator that is significantly higher than the original state, indicating substantial progress toward a full charge. The visual should also maintain the same setup (phone plugged into the wall socket) to ensure continuity.
The final image would likely show a battery icon with a larger red portion, signaling higher charge levels, while the rest remains gray. This conveys the passage of time and the charging process. The answer_text would describe this change, emphasizing the progress made in one hour.
</think>
| 4
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the phone screen shows a nearly empty battery icon with a red bar, indicating low charge. In Image B, the battery icon now has a significant portion filled with green, indicating a higher charge level; the red bar still remains at the left side. 2. Expected Visual Caption: If the instruction 'Draw what it will look like one hour later' is perfectly followed, the phone should appear as if it has been charging for an hour. The battery icon should be significantly higher (e.g., filled with green or another color denoting charge), and the phone and environment should remain otherwise unchanged. 3. Instruction Match: The change to the battery icon fulfills the instruction by showing a higher charge after one hour. However, the red bar from the low battery state remains, which is not typical for a higher charge level. The most accurate depiction would only show a green (charged) portion, with no red. The core concept is correct, but this minor detail is slightly off. 4. Decision: The edit is almost perfect but retains a minor visual inaccuracy (the persistent red bar), so this is a 4 for minor omission.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looks like after being exposed to the sun for a day.
|
<think>
The question involves transforming the snowy scene into one where the snow has melted, revealing the underlying road and surroundings. The user likely wants to visualize the effect of sunlight on the snow-covered area, showcasing a clear and sunny environment.
Analyzing the question_image, I notice a residential street covered in snow, with parked cars and houses lining both sides. The snow appears thick, and the atmosphere is cold. The question_text suggests the user is asking for a depiction of the same scene after the snow has melted, implying a bright, sunny day.
To create the answer_image, I would focus on removing the snow entirely, revealing the asphalt road and any textures or markings on it. The parked cars should remain visible, but their surfaces should appear dry and clean. The houses, trees, and fences would also need to be free of snow, showing their original colors and details. The sky would likely be bright blue or clear, emphasizing the sunny weather.
When forming the answer_text, I would describe the transformation, highlighting the absence of snow and the sunny atmosphere. The answer_image would match this description, showing a dry, clear road with no snow, and the surrounding environment illuminated by sunlight. This approach fulfills the user's request for a visual representation of the scene after the snow melts.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image B, the snow on the street and along the sides of the road has visibly melted compared to Image A. The road surface is now mostly clear, with only some residual snow at the edges, and the snowbanks are less pronounced. The snow on top of the cars and on the trees remains, but appears slightly reduced. The lighting in Image B is also warmer and more direct, suggesting sunlight. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After a day of sun exposure, the snow on the road and other exposed surfaces should be significantly melted, leaving behind wet or clear pavement and reduced snowbanks, while some snow may persist in shaded or sheltered areas. 3. Instruction Match: The correct objects (snow on the street and cars) are still present but reduced appropriately, and the melting effect is accurately depicted. The degree of change matches what would be expected after a day in the sun, with the most direct surfaces (the road) showing significant melt. 4. Decision: The edit precisely matches the intended modification, so this is a 5 for perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like one hour later.
|
<think>
The question_image shows a faucet pouring water into a bucket, and the question_text asks to visualize the scene after one hour. This suggests the user wants to see the progression of the water level in the bucket over time.
To reason through the answer, I consider the steady flow of water from the faucet and the gradual increase in the bucket's water level. The bucket is transparent, so the water level will be visible, and the time progression will be represented by the water rising.
The answer_image should depict the same setup but with the water level noticeably higher, indicating the passage of time. The faucet should still be pouring water, but the bucket should now contain more water, showing the accumulation over the hour. The lighting and background should remain consistent with the original image to preserve continuity.
This approach ensures the user's request for the one-hour progression is met visually and contextually.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the water level in the bucket is relatively low. In Image B, the water level in the same bucket has risen significantly, indicating more water has accumulated over time. No other visual elements have changed. 2. Expected Visual Caption: If the instruction 'Draw what it will look like one hour later' is perfectly followed, the bucket should have more water (assuming the tap continues running), with the water level noticeably higher than before. 3. Instruction Match: The correct object (the bucket) is modified, and the degree of change (increased water level) is accurately depicted, logically matching the scenario of an hour passing with the tap on. 4. Decision: The edit fulfills the instruction exactly as required, so this is a case of perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like one hour later.
|
<think>
The question_image shows a glass of tea with floating leaves, suggesting a freshly brewed beverage. The question_text asks for the appearance of the tea one hour later, implying the tea will have undergone changes due to steeping time.
To reason about this, I consider how tea typically evolves over time. The leaves may settle at the bottom, and the liquid could become more concentrated or slightly darker due to the extraction of flavors and tannins. The leaves might also lose some of their vibrant green color and appear more wilted or browned.
The answer_image should reflect these changes: the tea would likely appear darker and more concentrated, with fewer leaves floating on the surface. The leaves at the bottom of the glass would be visible and might look shriveled or browned, indicating they have steeped for an extended period. The background and lighting should remain consistent to maintain continuity with the original image.
</think>
| 4
|
1. Detect Difference: The liquid in the glass is considerably darker in Image B compared to the lighter, more transparent yellowish hue in Image A. The leaves inside and around the glass remain the same in quantity and position. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After one hour, the tea should be more steeped, resulting in a noticeably darker liquid as the tea leaves infuse, but the leaves would likely sink a bit or become more saturated; some might still float, but fewer than at the start. 3. Instruction Match: The edit accurately depicts the primary expected change—darker tea due to more steeping time. However, the position and condition of the leaves appear essentially unchanged and still mostly floating, which is a minor omission since, after an hour, some leaves would typically sink or look more saturated. 4. Decision: Since the main temporal change (darker liquid) is well represented but the details for the leaves are not updated to reflect the passage of time, this is a minor omission, resulting in a score of 4.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what they will look like ten years later.
|
<think>
To address the question, I observe that the original image features two individuals standing side by side, with clear differences in height and attire. The request is to visualize how they will look ten years later.
I would focus on the progression of their physical appearance, considering factors like aging, changes in height, and attire. For the older individual, I would expect features like wrinkles, gray hair, and a more mature build. For the younger individual, I would imagine increased height, more defined features, and perhaps a more confident or adventurous style.
The clothing would likely reflect their personal growth and preferences, such as the older individual wearing a slightly more formal or rugged outfit, while the younger individual might sport something more casual or expressive. The background could remain consistent, maintaining the natural setting with grass and flowers.
In the answer image, I would depict the older person with a more weathered appearance, perhaps wearing a jacket and boots, while the younger person appears taller and more confident, dressed in a casual outfit. The overall composition should convey a sense of time passing and personal development while maintaining the original setting.
</think>
| 4
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image B, the child appears older—he is taller, with a more mature physique, longer limbs, and his clothing has changed from shorts to long pants and more adult-like shoes. The adult figure appears largely the same in terms of posture, clothing, and physical attributes. 2. Expected Visual Caption: If the instruction 'Draw what they will look like ten years later' is followed perfectly, the child should be visibly aged by about ten years (older child or young teenager), and the adult should also show signs of aging (e.g., more pronounced gray hair, aging in face and posture, perhaps subtle changes in clothing style or fit). 3. Instruction Match: The edit successfully aged the child, making him taller and more mature in appearance, which directly addresses the instruction. However, the adult does not exhibit clear additional aging compared to the original, missing a minor but relevant detail. 4. Decision: The primary requirement (showing the passage of ten years) is mostly fulfilled, especially for the child, but there is a minor omission in not visibly aging the adult. Therefore, the score is 4.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what they will look like one year later.
|
<think>
The question asks for a depiction of the kitten one year later. From the question_image, the kitten is small, standing on its hind legs, interacting with a young tree in a serene, natural setting. The user likely wants to see the progression of the kitten's growth and development over time.
To create the answer image, I would imagine the kitten as a larger, more mature version of itself. Its fur might be fuller and more defined, and its posture could reflect increased confidence or curiosity. The tree would likely grow taller, with more developed leaves, symbolizing the passage of time. The background could remain consistent with the original image's natural setting, maintaining continuity and emphasizing the growth theme.
The answer image would show the kitten in a similar environment but with a more developed appearance, standing upright and interacting with the now taller tree. This progression would visually communicate the passage of time and the kitten's growth.
</think>
| 2
|
1. Detect Difference: Comparing Image A and Image B, the most notable visual difference is that the kitten in Image B looks slightly younger and smaller, with rounder features, while the kitten in Image A appears a bit larger and more mature. The plant in both images is roughly the same size and stage of growth, and the surrounding environment is almost identical. 2. Expected Visual Caption: If the instruction 'Draw what they will look like one year later' were followed, we should expect to see the kitten as a grown cat (significant size increase, adult features), and the small plant should have grown taller and possibly more robust, with more leaves or possibly flowers or fruit, reflecting a year's worth of growth. 3. Instruction Match: The differences do not match the instruction. The kitten does not look older—if anything, it looks slightly younger in Image B. The plant has not grown or changed in a way that suggests a year has passed. 4. Decision: The edit does not make the subjects look as they would after a year; most of the required changes (growth and maturation) are missing. This is a major omission, so the instruction_score is 2.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like three months later.
|
<think>
The question_image shows a tadpole, which is in its early developmental stage. The question_text asks to visualize what the tadpole will look like three months later, implying a transformation into a more developed stage, likely a frog.
To reason about this, I consider the typical developmental stages of amphibians. Tadpoles undergo metamorphosis, where they lose their tail, develop legs, and gain a more frog-like appearance. Three months later, the tadpole would likely have fully developed legs, a shrinking tail, and a more defined body structure resembling a frog.
When creating the answer_image, I would depict a frog with fully developed limbs, a smaller tail, and a body adapted for terrestrial life. The coloration would likely shift to a more vibrant green, and the texture would appear smoother compared to the tadpole. The image would emphasize the transition from aquatic to terrestrial features, such as the legs and head shape.
The answer_text would describe this transformation, highlighting the physical changes that occur during this period. This reasoning ensures the response aligns with the developmental process of amphibians.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: Image A shows a tadpole—an aquatic larval stage of a frog, with a tail, no developed limbs (except possibly beginning hind limb buds), and no clear frog features. Image B shows a fully formed small green frog, with four legs, no prominent tail, and all the characteristic features of an adult frog. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After three months, a typical tadpole would undergo metamorphosis and become a frog, losing its tail and developing legs, with a distinct frog body shape and coloration. 3. Instruction Match: The instruction asks for a depiction of what the tadpole will look like in three months. The edit replaces the tadpole with a mature frog, accurately reflecting the expected biological transformation. The correct object has been modified (tadpole to frog), and the degree of transformation (full metamorphosis) is appropriate. 4. Decision: The edit perfectly matches the instruction, showing the correct outcome after three months. Score: 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like a six hours later.
|
<think>
The question asks for a depiction of the scene six hours later, suggesting a change in time and lighting. The question_image shows a desert landscape with a bright sun overhead, indicating daytime. To create the answer, I would consider the progression of time and how the sun's position and lighting would change.
Six hours later, the sun would have moved in the sky, possibly setting or moving to a lower position, which would result in a softer, warmer light. The shadows would lengthen, and the sky might display hues of orange, pink, or purple, typical of a sunset. The desert landscape would still be visible but with a different ambiance, as the light source shifts.
The answer image would likely show a similar desert scene but with a sunset in the background, the sun either just below the horizon or partially set. The sky would transition to a gradient of warm colors, and the lighting would be softer, casting longer shadows across the ground. This aligns with the concept of time progression and the described change in the environment.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the sun is high in the sky with bright daylight and clear blue sky. In Image B, the sun is no longer visible, and the sky shows the colors of sunset or dusk (purple, orange, and pink hues), with the ground and mountains in shadow. 2. Expected Visual Caption: If six hours have passed from midday, the sun would have moved lower in the sky, likely setting or having just set, resulting in a dusk/sunset scene with much dimmer lighting and a colorful horizon. 3. Instruction Match: The correct object—the sky and lighting of the landscape—has changed to reflect six hours later. The transition from bright midday sun to sunset/dusk lighting and colors is accurate for a six-hour progression. 4. Decision: The edit precisely fulfills the instruction with an appropriate depiction of a scene six hours later. Therefore, the score is 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what they will look like five seconds later.
|
<think>
The question image shows a sprint race in progress, with runners in various stages of acceleration. The question_text asks what they will look like five seconds later, implying a progression in the race. To generate the answer image, I would visualize the runners further along the track, with increased speed and effort.
The final image should depict the runners in a more advanced stage of the race, showcasing their positions relative to one another. Their postures would likely be more dynamic, with arms and legs extended further, and their bodies leaning forward to emphasize momentum. The track and surrounding environment would remain consistent, but the runners would be farther along the path, reflecting their continued acceleration.
This progression should convey the sense of competition and the dynamic nature of the race, aligning with the user's request for a depiction of what happens five seconds later.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the runners are at the starting blocks, just beginning to sprint, with bodies bent low and arms moving forward. In Image B, the runners are much further down the track, fully sprinting, with upright and extended bodies, showing significant forward motion. The scene has shifted to further along the race, and the runners' positions and postures reflect being in full stride. 2. Expected Visual Caption: Five seconds after the start of a sprint race, the runners should be much farther down the track, away from the starting blocks, and in full sprinting position, with bodies upright or extended, arms pumping, and legs stretched out. 3. Instruction Match: The edit accurately depicts the runners as they would appear five seconds into the race—well down the track and sprinting at speed. The correct objects (the original runners) are present, and the degree of movement matches an expected five-second interval in a sprint. There is no indication of object replacement; all athletes appear to be the same as in the original. 4. Decision: The edited image perfectly fulfills the instruction by advancing the runners in a realistic fashion, matching the expected outcome. Score: 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after a week in a damp basement.
|
<think>
To reason through this, I observe that the question_image shows a loaf of bread with a golden-brown crust and a soft, airy interior. The question_text asks how the bread would look after a week in a damp basement. This implies a focus on the effects of prolonged exposure to moisture and humidity.
Considering typical bread behavior in such conditions, the bread would likely become moldy and discolored due to the damp environment. The crust might soften, and the mold could spread from the surface into the interior, causing discoloration and potentially a foul odor. The texture would appear spongy or crusty, and the bread would likely lose its appetizing appearance.
In the answer image, I would expect to see the bread with visible mold growth, possibly green or fuzzy patches on the surface and inside. The crust might appear darker or discolored, and the overall structure would look less appealing, reflecting the effects of prolonged dampness. This aligns with the user's request to visualize the bread's state after a week in a damp basement.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: The original image (Image A) shows a fresh loaf of bread with a golden-brown crust, clean interior, and no visible blemishes or discoloration. The edited image (Image B) shows the same loaf, but now covered in extensive blue-green and black mold patches on the crust and interior, as well as scattered mold on the plate and surrounding area. The bread’s texture appears slightly rougher, but the loaf itself is unchanged in shape or size. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After a week in a damp basement, the bread should appear stale and moldy, with visible mold growth (commonly blue, green, black, or white), spots on the crust and interior, and possible mold residue on the plate or surface. The loaf should still be recognizable as the original bread, but clearly spoiled. 3. Instruction Match: The correct object (the loaf of bread) is retained and not replaced. The attribute modified is the appearance to simulate spoilage and mold growth after a week in a damp environment, which is accurately depicted with heavy mold throughout the loaf and on the plate. The degree of modification (heavy, widespread mold typical of a week in damp conditions) matches expectations. 4. Decision: The edit fulfills the instruction precisely, with all required changes present and visually plausible. Therefore, the score is 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after one month of being neglected.
|
<think>
The user wants to visualize the consequences of neglecting the plant for one month. From the question_image, the plant appears healthy and well-maintained, positioned near a window with good lighting. The question_text suggests the plant will deteriorate due to lack of care.
To create the answer_image, I would imagine the plant with signs of neglect: wilted leaves, discoloration, or drooping stems. The pot might appear dusty or dirty, and the overall environment could look less vibrant. The lighting might seem dimmer, emphasizing the lack of care. The plant's leaves could have brown edges or spots, and the soil might appear dry or sparse.
The answer_text would describe the plant's condition after neglect, emphasizing its deteriorated state. The image would visually represent the contrast between the initial healthy state and the neglected state, ensuring the user sees the impact of neglect clearly.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: Image B shows several visual changes compared to Image A: some leaves are brown, curled, and appear dried out; there is visible soil on the leaves and around the pot, as well as dirt on the pot itself and the table surface. The plant overall looks less healthy and more disheveled. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After one month of neglect, the plant should show signs of stress and poor health such as browning or withered leaves, possibly some dirtiness or messiness around the pot, and an overall less vibrant appearance. 3. Instruction Match: The correct object (the plant in the pot) is shown as neglected, with clear signs of leaf deterioration and environmental neglect (dirt and mess present). The degree of change is accurate for a month of neglect, showing both plant and environmental consequences. 4. Decision: The changes precisely and fully match the instruction, so this is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after ten years of use.
|
<think>
To address the question, I first observe the question_image, which shows a sleek black leather jacket. The question_text asks for a depiction of what the jacket would look like after ten years of use. This implies a transformation due to wear and tear, such as fading, scuff marks, or discoloration.
I envision the jacket after prolonged use: the leather might lose its glossy finish and develop visible signs of aging, like creases, worn edges, and possible discoloration. The pockets and buttons might show signs of wear, and the overall structure could appear slightly frayed or less polished. The jacket might also have a slightly looser fit due to wear.
For the answer_image, I would depict the same jacket but with these characteristics: faded black tones, visible creases, and signs of aging. The texture might appear rougher, and the overall appearance would reflect a well-loved, used item rather than a new one. This aligns with the idea of a jacket that has been through ten years of use.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: The original jacket (Image A) is uniformly black, smooth, and appears new. In the edited image (Image B), the jacket shows significant areas of discoloration, fading, and what looks like worn or scuffed patches, especially on the sleeves, chest, and collar. The overall surface appears less shiny and more irregular, simulating aging or heavy use. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After ten years of use, the jacket should show clear signs of wear and tear, such as faded or discolored areas, possible scuffs, loss of shine, creases, and a generally aged appearance, but it should remain the same garment (no replacement or drastic structural changes). 3. Instruction Match: The edit modifies the correct object (the jacket), and the changes are appropriate to suggest ten years of use: realistic wear, discoloration, and visible surface degradation. The degree and placement of the wear match what would be expected from long-term use, fulfilling the instruction. 4. Decision: All required changes are present and accurate, so this is a perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after three months in a busy urban environment.
|
<think>
To address the question, I first observe the question_image, which features a sleek, modern SUV in a clean, suburban setting. The question_text asks for a depiction of the vehicle after three months in a busy urban environment, implying wear and tear, dirt, and urban elements.
I consider the environmental factors that would affect the vehicle's appearance in a bustling city. These include dust, dirt from exhaust, and potential scratches or marks from driving through rougher streets. Additionally, urban elements like graffiti, street signs, and other vehicles might be visible in the background to emphasize the busy setting.
When forming the answer_image, I would depict the same SUV now covered in dirt and grime, with a gritty urban backdrop. The vehicle might have minor scratches or smudges on its surface, and the surrounding environment should include elements like graffiti-covered walls, parked cars, and pedestrians to reinforce the urban atmosphere.
The final answer_text would describe the vehicle's altered state, highlighting its dirty and weathered appearance, while the answer_image would visually support this by showing the SUV in a gritty urban environment with visible signs of wear.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: Image B shows the same car as in Image A, but now it is significantly dirtier, covered in mud and grime with visible streaks and splashes on the body, wheels, and windows. The background has changed from a clean, upscale building to an urban street scene with graffiti on the walls, parked cars, and worn pavement. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After three months in a busy urban environment, the car should appear noticeably dirty, with dirt, dust, and mud on the exterior, possibly with some minor wear on the tires and body. The setting should reflect a typical urban area—graffiti, other cars, and signs of heavy use. 3. Instruction Match: The edit addresses all aspects of the instruction: the car itself is the same model and color, but now realistically dirty from urban use, and the background is changed to a convincing busy city environment. No key elements are omitted. 4. Decision: The image perfectly fulfills the instruction—both the car's condition and the environment match the expected result after three months in a busy city. Therefore, the score is 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after a season of autumn.
|
<think>
The question asks for a transformation of the tree depicted in the question_image into what it would look like during autumn. Observing the question_image, the tree is lush and green, indicative of summer or spring. To meet the request, I would imagine the tree in autumn, where leaves typically turn shades of yellow, orange, and red, and some may fall, leaving a sparse appearance.
The answer_image should depict the same tree in autumn, with vibrant fall colors on the remaining leaves and a few scattered fallen leaves on the ground. The lighting and sky should remain consistent with the original image, ensuring continuity. The background buildings and grassy area should also remain unchanged to maintain the context of the location. This approach ensures the transformation is visually accurate and aligns with the user's request.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: The main tree in the center, which was lush green in Image A, has changed in Image B to display predominantly orange and yellow foliage with some hints of red, indicating autumnal colors. The rest of the scene (background trees, buildings, sky) remains unchanged. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After a season of autumn, the tree should have leaves that have turned yellow, orange, or red, typical of autumn foliage, possibly with a few leaves starting to fall or thinning. 3. Instruction Match: The correct object (the main tree) has been modified, with its leaves changing to appropriate autumn colors. There is no sign of replacement or incorrect modification. The degree and type of color change are accurate for autumn. 4. Decision: Since the edit faithfully and accurately reflects the visual transformation expected after an autumn season, this is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after being in storage for a century.
|
<think>
The user is asking for a depiction of the wooden chest after a century of storage. The question_image shows a vintage wooden chest with metal reinforcements and latches, indicating it was designed for durability and perhaps travel or storage purposes. The question_text suggests the chest has aged over time, and the user wants to visualize its appearance after a century.
To create the answer image, I would consider the effects of aging on wood and metal. The chest would likely show signs of wear, such as scratches, discoloration, and possible damage to the metal reinforcements. The wood might have a darker, weathered tone, with visible cracks or splits, especially around the joints and edges. The metal elements might develop rust or patina, and the latches could appear worn or corroded.
The answer image should reflect these characteristics, showing the chest's aged and weathered state. It would depict a rustic, antique appearance with visible signs of aging, such as faded paint, uneven surfaces, and a general sense of historical wear. This approach aligns with the user's request to visualize the chest after a century of storage.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: Image B shows the same chest as Image A, but the surface now appears faded, discolored, and worn. There is a grayish patina over much of the wood, with some areas looking duller or patchy, and the metal fittings appear more tarnished. The wood surface shows signs of aging, including loss of the original sheen, uneven coloration, and apparent minor wear. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should depict the chest as it would look after a century in storage: significant fading of the wood, accumulation of dust or patina, tarnished or corroded metal hardware, and general signs of age and neglect without major structural changes. 3. Instruction Match: The visual changes correspond exactly to the likely effects of a hundred years in storage. The chest is not replaced; rather, its attributes—color, surface texture, and hardware finish—have been convincingly aged. 4. Decision: The edit precisely fulfills the instruction, with all required aging effects present and accurate. This is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like an hour later.
|
<think>
The question_image shows a freshly cut apple with a clean, crisp appearance. The user asks to visualize what the apple will look like an hour later, suggesting the need to account for natural aging processes. Over time, apples typically change in appearance due to oxidation, moisture loss, and potential browning.
In forming the answer, I would consider the apple's exposed surfaces. The flesh would likely start to discolor slightly as it oxidizes, turning from a bright white to a pale yellow or light brown. The seeds and core might remain unchanged, but the surrounding flesh would show signs of drying. The stem area might also appear slightly darker or shriveled due to moisture loss.
The answer_image would depict the apple with these changes. The flesh would appear less vibrant, with some areas showing browning or discoloration. The overall texture would look slightly shriveled, and the stem might appear slightly wilted. These details would convey the passage of time and the natural aging process of the apple.
</think>
| 2
|
1. Detect Difference: The main visual change between Image A and Image B is a slight yellowing and desaturation, mainly around the core and edges of the apple flesh. The overall structure, seeds, and shape remain unaltered. There is no significant browning, shriveling, or other signs of time progression. 2. Expected Visual Caption: If the instruction 'Draw what it will look like an hour later' is followed perfectly, the apple flesh should display noticeable browning/oxidation, especially on the cut surfaces, possibly a slight drying or loss of moisture, but the apple should still maintain its shape and structure. 3. Instruction Match: The edit only introduces a faint yellow tint, but does not introduce the expected brown discoloration or realistic changes associated with an apple slice left for an hour (oxidation). The change is present but very minimal and does not convincingly depict an apple after an hour of exposure. 4. Decision: The main effect required (visible browning) is either missing or too subtle to be convincing, so this counts as a major omission. Score: 2.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after two years underwater.
|
<think>
The user wants to visualize the key underwater after two years. The original image shows a metallic key on a wooden surface. To meet the request, I would imagine the key submerged in water, with signs of corrosion or oxidation due to prolonged exposure. The surrounding environment should be underwater, with a focus on the key's texture and color changes. The final image would depict the key with a weathered, aged appearance, likely with rust or tarnish, set against a blurred underwater backdrop to emphasize the submerged state.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: The original image shows a clean, metallic key on a wooden surface. In the edited image, the key is underwater with a blue-green aquatic background, bubbles, and prominent patches of rust and corrosion covering the metal. The surface it was resting on is gone, replaced by an underwater environment. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After two years underwater, the key should appear submerged, likely with significant corrosion or rust, marine growth, and a changed background indicating an aquatic setting. 3. Instruction Match: The correct object (the key) remains present, and the requested transformation (appearance after two years underwater) is convincingly rendered: the key is rusty and corroded, the environment is underwater, and visual cues (bubbles, aquatic background) reinforce the passage of time underwater. Degree of modification (heavy rust/corrosion, aquatic setting) matches expectation. 4. Decision: All required visual changes are present and accurate; the edit perfectly fulfills the instruction.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like 50 years after abandonment.
|
<think>
To address the request, I first observe the question_image, which shows a vibrant and well-maintained carousel in a fairground setting. The question_text asks for a depiction of the carousel 50 years after abandonment, implying a state of decay and neglect.
To create this, I imagine the carousel in a state of disrepair. The structure would likely show signs of rust, peeling paint, and broken or missing elements. The surrounding area would be overgrown with weeds, grass, and possibly debris, reflecting long-term abandonment. The lighting might appear dull or faded, with the once-bright lights now dim or absent. The horses would likely be missing or broken, and the metal framework might be corroded.
The answer image would emphasize these details, showing the carousel as a relic of its former glory, surrounded by nature reclaiming the space. The sky might be overcast, adding to the sense of desolation. This approach aligns with the user's request for a 50-year abandonment timeline.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image B, the carousel appears weathered and rusted, with faded and peeling paint, missing or broken light bulbs, and bent or decayed poles. The once-bright lights are off, and the scene is overgrown with tall grass, indicating neglect. The sky is overcast, adding to the abandoned atmosphere. The surrounding area also looks more deserted, with vegetation encroaching and no people or cars visible. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The carousel should show clear signs of 50 years of abandonment: rust, decay, faded paint, overgrown vegetation, no functioning lights, and a generally neglected and desolate environment. 3. Instruction Match: The edit modifies the correct object (the carousel), and the changes—rust, weathering, broken elements, overgrown grass, and an abandoned setting—accurately depict what one would expect after 50 years of abandonment. 4. Decision: All required elements of the instruction are present and correctly implemented, so this is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looked like ten years ago.
|
<think>
To address the question, I first observe the question_image, which shows a lone elephant in a dry savanna landscape. The question_text asks to depict what the scene looked like "ten years ago," suggesting a need to infer or recreate the environment and the elephant's state from a decade earlier.
Based on the current image, the elephant appears healthy, and the landscape is arid. To create a ten-year earlier depiction, I would consider environmental changes such as increased vegetation, possibly a wetter climate, and the elephant's physical condition might be slightly different due to aging or environmental factors.
The answer_image would likely show the same elephant, but its skin might appear slightly worn or weathered, and the surrounding landscape could have more lush greenery, indicating a wetter period. The elephant's posture might also reflect a more aged appearance, with subtle changes in its body structure or skin texture.
This reasoning ensures the answer aligns with the request and provides a plausible depiction of the scene from ten years ago.
</think>
| 1
|
1. Detect Difference: Image A shows an elephant walking in a dry, open plain with yellowish grass under a clear blue sky. Image B shows an elephant standing in a greener, wetter environment with water and bushes visible in the background. The lighting and posture of the elephant are different, and the elephants themselves are not identical in features or pose. 2. Expected Visual Caption: If the instruction to 'draw what it looked like ten years ago' were followed, Image B should depict the same individual elephant as in Image A, but visibly younger (e.g., smaller size, fewer wrinkles, possibly shorter tusks or other signs of youth), in the same or a similar environment. 3. Instruction Match: The edit does not show a younger version of the same elephant. Instead, Image B is a different photo of another (or at least not obviously the same) elephant in a different background with no clear indication of being ten years younger. The object was replaced, not modified to appear younger. 4. Decision: The core instruction is not fulfilled at all. This is a case of non-compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after six months.
|
<think>
The question asks for a depiction of how the scene will look after six months. Observing the question_image, I notice a framed rainbow artwork on a gray wall with shadows cast by trees. The surrounding environment includes a sidewalk, some greenery, and a visible street with parked cars.
To reason about the answer, I imagine seasonal changes over six months. The greenery at the base of the wall might become overgrown or less vibrant, while the shadows from the trees could shift due to changes in sunlight angle. The parked cars and street remain consistent, but the overall atmosphere might appear slightly altered due to weathering or seasonal effects.
For the answer_image, I would expect the artwork to remain unchanged, but the surrounding elements—such as the vegetation, wall texture, and lighting—might reflect a more aged or weathered look. The shadows could be longer or softer, and the greenery might appear less lush or slightly overgrown. The overall scene would convey a sense of time passing while maintaining the original composition.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: The most noticeable visual change is the increased growth and spread of vegetation at the base of the wall and around the bottom of the mural in Image B compared to Image A. The plants are larger, denser, and extend further up the wall, indicating significant passage of time. The mural itself and the wall remain unchanged. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After six months, the scene should show signs of time passing, such as more developed and overgrown vegetation, possibly some weathering, but with the mural largely intact. 3. Instruction Match: The edit correctly depicts the passage of six months by increasing the size and density of the plants at the base of the wall. There are no extraneous or missing elements regarding the time passage: the mural is unchanged (as expected), and the environmental shift (plant growth) is the appropriate, realistic change. 4. Decision: The edited image perfectly matches the instruction, visually representing the effect of six months passing. This is a clear case of perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like two weeks after flowering.
|
<think>
The question asks for a depiction of the sunflower two weeks after flowering. Observing the question_image, it shows a vibrant, fully bloomed sunflower with bright yellow petals and a detailed center. The user likely wants to visualize the progression of the sunflower's lifecycle, specifically its post-flowering stage.
To reason about this, I consider the natural development of sunflowers. After flowering, the petals typically wilt and droop, and the center transitions from a vivid, greenish-yellow to a more muted brown or dry appearance. The seeds within the center will also start to mature and appear more defined.
In forming the answer_image, I would depict the sunflower with drooping petals, a faded center, and visible seeds. The surrounding environment might include dry soil or remnants of the plant, emphasizing the post-flowering state. The image should convey a sense of natural decay while maintaining the recognizable features of the sunflower. This approach aligns with the request to show the sunflower two weeks after flowering.
</think>
| 2
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the sunflower is upright, vibrant, with fresh yellow petals and a healthy green center. In Image B, the sunflower appears wilted, is lying on the ground, with brown and yellowing petals, drooping leaves, and an overall dried and aged appearance. 2. Expected Visual Caption: Two weeks after flowering, a sunflower should show early signs of seed development and some maturation: petals may begin to droop or fade slightly, the disk may swell as seeds mature, but the flower should still be attached to an upright stem and not yet fully dried or dead. 3. Instruction Match: The edit in Image B goes far beyond what would be expected just two weeks after flowering; it depicts a sunflower that is near the end of its life cycle, with extensive wilting, browning, and detachment from the stem. The correct object is modified, but the degree of change is excessive and inaccurate for the specified timeframe. 4. Decision: Most of the required change (showing post-flowering development) is present, but the depiction is too advanced and not appropriate for only two weeks after flowering, constituting a major omission. Thus, the score is 2.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after 200 years.
|
<think>
To address the question, I observe that the user wants to visualize the bust after 200 years. The original image shows a detailed stone sculpture with intricate carvings and a serene garden background. To create the answer, I would imagine the bust weathered over time, with visible signs of aging such as erosion, discoloration, and moss growth. The garden setting would also change, with overgrown plants and a more aged, natural look. The final image should reflect these changes while retaining the sculpture's original structure and placement.
</think>
| 3
|
1. Detect Difference: The statue in Image B appears darker, with more discoloration and black spots, simulating some degree of weathering or aging. The background foliage is also less vibrant and slightly more desaturated, with some leaves turning yellow. However, the physical structure of the statue remains completely intact; there are no signs of major erosion, cracks, missing pieces, plant growth, or other dramatic effects of 200 years of exposure. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After 200 years, the statue should show significant signs of aging: notable weathering, possible surface erosion, cracks, chips, moss or lichen growth, staining, and/or missing fragments. The environment might also look more overgrown or altered. 3. Instruction Match: The edit introduces some superficial aging effects (discoloration, spotting), but lacks the depth, damage, and environmental transformation typically expected after two centuries. The core idea of age is present, but it is only partially realized, as the changes are relatively minor and the statue remains in almost pristine form structurally. 4. Decision: The edit demonstrates partial compliance with the instruction, earning a 3.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after baking for 45 minutes.
|
<think>
The question involves visualizing the result of baking the dough shown in the question_image for 45 minutes. The dough appears to be in its pre-baked state, resting on a baking sheet dusted with flour. Based on the context, the user likely wants to see how the dough transforms after baking.
To reason through the transformation, I consider typical baking outcomes for dough like this. The dough will likely rise further and develop a golden-brown crust due to the heat. The texture will become more firm and slightly puffed, with a smooth and even surface. The lighting and oven environment in the question_image suggest warm tones, which are expected to carry over into the baked dough’s appearance.
The answer_image should depict the dough with a golden-brown crust, evenly baked, and possibly with a slight sheen from the oven’s heat. The baking tray and flour dusting should remain consistent with the original image, maintaining continuity. The dough's surface should look fully baked, with no visible cracks or uneven areas, indicating a successful bake.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the dough is pale, raw, and has a smooth surface with little to no browning. In Image B, the dough appears significantly more browned, especially on the top and sides, indicating it has been baked. The surface texture also looks slightly firmer and drier, characteristic of baked bread. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After baking for 45 minutes, the dough should appear golden to deep brown on the surface, with a firmer, drier crust replacing the raw, pale look of unbaked dough. 3. Instruction Match: The edited image (B) shows the original dough with a realistic baked appearance—browned and slightly crisp on the outside—while retaining the original shape and context. This matches exactly what would be expected after 45 minutes of baking. 4. Decision: The edit fully and faithfully implements the baking transformation as requested, so this is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after six hours outdoors on a snowy day.
|
<think>
The question_image shows a wooden bench in a park surrounded by trees and grass, indicating a sunny, clear day. The question_text asks to visualize the bench after six hours outdoors on a snowy day, implying a transformation of the environment to reflect winter conditions.
To create the answer, I would imagine the bench covered in a layer of snow, with the surrounding grass and ground blanketed in white. The trees might have snow-laden branches, and the lighting would shift to a colder, overcast tone. The bench itself might appear slightly weathered due to exposure to the elements.
The answer image would depict this transformation, showing the bench with snow on its surface and the ground, along with a wintry atmosphere. The trees might appear frosted or partially covered in snow, and the overall scene would convey the chilliness of a snowy day. This aligns with the request to visualize the bench after six hours outdoors in snowy conditions.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: The original image shows a park bench on a grassy area with green grass and leafy trees, under a bright, clear atmosphere. In the edited image, the scene is transformed: the ground, bench, and surrounding environment are covered in snow, with a wintry, overcast ambiance. Snow visibly accumulates on the bench seat and backrest, on the ground, and on the trees. The grass is no longer visible, replaced by a blanket of snow. The overall color palette shifts from warm greens and browns to cold whites and grays. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After six hours outdoors on a snowy day, the bench and its surroundings should be visibly covered with a significant layer of snow—snow on the seat, backrest, and around the bench; a wintry background with snow-laden ground and trees; no visible green grass or leaves. 3. Instruction Match: The edit accurately transforms the scene to depict what the bench and park would look like after six hours of continuous snowfall: thick snow accumulation in all expected places, proper lighting, and environmental changes. The correct object (the bench and its immediate setting) is modified, not replaced, and the degree of snow coverage is plausible for the given time frame. 4. Decision: The edit fully complies with the instruction, so the score is 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw this scene in the style of 70 years ago.
|
<think>
To transform the scene into a 70-year-old style, I would focus on altering the architectural details to reflect older designs, such as shorter skyscrapers with simpler facades and less glass. The skyline would appear less modern, with a mix of older buildings and fewer skyscrapers. The river and surrounding landscape would be kept consistent, but the color palette would shift to warmer, faded tones to evoke a vintage atmosphere. The lighting would also change to a softer, more subdued glow, typical of older photography.
</think>
| 3
|
1. Detect Difference: The edited image (Image B) introduces a sepia-toned, faded coloration and a slight blur, simulating an aged or vintage photograph. There is a yellowish tint and some vignetting, and overall the image mimics the appearance of an old photo print. The buildings and scene composition, however, remain unchanged with all modern skyscrapers intact. 2. Expected Visual Caption: If the instruction was perfectly followed, the scene should have been rendered as it might have appeared 70 years ago, both in artistic style (color, texture, grain, etc.) and in historical content (architecture appropriate to the era; modern skyscrapers absent or replaced with period-appropriate buildings). 3. Instruction Match: The edit captures the vintage photographic style but fails to update the architectural content to reflect what the skyline would have looked like 70 years ago. The core of the instruction (the style) is addressed, but the absence of historical accuracy in the cityscape itself is a major omission. 4. Decision: Because only the style is changed and not the actual content of the scene, this counts as partial compliance—a score of 3.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what they will look like after frying for 5 minutes.
|
<think>
The question_image shows raw eggs in a pan, with bright orange yolks and clear whites. The question_text asks to visualize how these eggs will look after frying for 5 minutes, implying a transformation from raw to cooked.
To reason this out, I consider the typical frying process: heat causes the whites to solidify and become opaque, while the yolks may remain slightly runny or fully set, depending on the cooking time. The whites would develop a golden or slightly browned appearance, and the yolks might appear firmer but still retain some softness.
The answer_image should depict fully cooked eggs with the whites appearing opaque and slightly browned, and the yolks either fully set or still slightly runny. The pan's surface might show some oil or residue from the frying process, and the eggs should look appetizing and well-cooked. This aligns with the user's request for a 5-minute frying result.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the eggs are raw with clear, viscous whites and bright orange yolks. In Image B, the eggs appear cooked: the whites are opaque and solidified, some browning is visible on the whites and yolks, and the yolks have lost their raw sheen and are paler. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After frying for 5 minutes, the eggs should have opaque, set whites, yolks that are firmer and lighter in color, and some browning or crisping on the edges due to cooking. 3. Instruction Match: The correct objects (the same eggs) were modified; the requested attribute (appearance after 5 minutes of frying) is depicted accurately, with appropriate solidification, color change, and light browning. 4. Decision: All changes are present and accurate; this is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after being frozen in the refrigerator.
|
<think>
The user wants to visualize how the strawberries in the bowl would appear after being frozen in the refrigerator. Observing the question_image, the strawberries are fresh and vibrant, with their bright red color and green leaves intact. The question_text specifies the transformation to a frozen state, so the goal is to depict the strawberries in a frozen form.
To achieve this, the strawberries should appear coated in frost or ice crystals, with a slightly duller appearance compared to their fresh state. The vibrant red color should still be recognizable, but the texture should shift to a frosty or icy surface. The green leaves may also appear slightly softened or coated in frost. The bowl and background should remain unchanged to maintain consistency with the original image.
When generating the answer_image, I would ensure the strawberries are depicted with a realistic frozen texture, emphasizing the contrast between the icy exterior and the underlying red flesh. The frosty effect should cover the entire surface of the strawberries, giving a clear indication of the freezing process. This approach aligns with the user's request and provides a visually accurate representation of the frozen strawberries.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image B, compared to Image A, the strawberries appear to have a layer of frost or ice crystals on their surfaces, giving them a whitish, frozen texture. The strawberries otherwise remain the same in terms of placement, shape, and color beneath the frost. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The strawberries in the bowl should look as if they have just been taken out of the freezer, exhibiting visible frost or ice crystals on their surfaces, with a slightly matte or whitish overlay typical of frozen fruit. 3. Instruction Match: The correct objects—the strawberries in the bowl—were modified, not replaced. The requested attribute (appearance of having been frozen) was accurately applied, with realistic frost/ice on each berry and no replacement or misinterpretation. The degree of modification is appropriate and matches what fresh strawberries look like after being frozen. 4. Decision: The edit precisely matches the instruction in all regards; no detail is missing or incorrect. This is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like ten seconds later.
|
<think>
The question asks for the appearance of the scene ten seconds after the depicted moment, which shows a water droplet falling into a lake. The focus is on the ripples and reflections caused by the droplet's impact.
To reason through this, I consider the physics of water waves and reflections. The droplet creates concentric ripples that expand outward, and the impact point becomes a focal point where the water distorts. Ten seconds later, the ripples would have spread further, with the initial impact area becoming less pronounced and the wave patterns more diffuse.
The answer image should depict the lake's surface with larger, more spread-out ripples radiating from the center. The reflections of the surrounding mountains and sky would still be present but slightly distorted due to the water's movement. The overall effect should convey the passage of time and the dynamic nature of water waves.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, several water droplets are suspended above the water surface with a prominent splash and ripples at the point of impact. In Image B, the droplets above the surface are gone, the splash is subdued to a small peak, and the ripples have expanded outward and become smoother. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After ten seconds, the droplets should have fallen back into the water, the splash should have subsided, and the ripples should have spread wider and become less pronounced, with the water surface returning closer to calm. 3. Instruction Match: The edit correctly removes the suspended droplets and shows the aftermath of the splash, with the water surface showing wider, more attenuated ripples and minimal disturbance. This matches exactly what is expected ten seconds after a drop hits the water. 4. Decision: All required changes are present and accurate, so this is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after a century of global warming.
|
<think>
The question asks for a depiction of the glacier after a century of global warming. Observing the question_image, the glacier is pristine and intact, with no visible signs of melting or erosion. The user likely wants to visualize the consequences of global warming on such a structure over a long period.
To create the answer, I would consider the effects of climate change, such as increased melting, ice shelf collapse, and reduced ice coverage. The answer_image should depict a significantly eroded glacier with visible cracks, melting edges, and reduced ice mass. The waterline might be higher, and the landscape could appear more rugged or fragmented. The sky might also reflect a warmer, overcast atmosphere to emphasize the environmental change.
The answer_text should describe these changes, emphasizing the melting and altered appearance of the glacier. The final image should visually represent these effects, contrasting the original pristine glacier with the eroded and melting state.
</think>
| 2
|
1. Detect Difference: The original image (A) shows a vibrant, blue-toned glacier under a bright blue sky, with clear icy reflections in the water. The edited image (B) depicts the same glacier, but the ice appears dull, grayish, and weathered, with a dark, overcast sky. The glacier’s structure remains largely unchanged and its size and presence are very similar, but the coloration is more muted and there is less vibrancy overall. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After a century of global warming, one would expect dramatic glacial retreat or disappearance, with much less ice (or none at all), potentially more exposed rock, higher water levels, and possibly green or barren land replacing the glacier. The glacier should appear significantly melted, reduced, fragmented, or even gone, with clear visual evidence of warming-induced loss. 3. Instruction Match: The edit changes the color and mood, making the glacier appear dirtier and the atmosphere more ominous, but the glacier’s mass, extent, and overall structure are virtually unchanged. There is no convincing visual evidence of substantial melting, retreat, or loss, which are the main hallmarks of a century of global warming. The core transformation—significant glacier reduction or disappearance—has not been implemented. 4. Decision: Because the edit only conveys atmospheric and color changes (weathering, dullness) but not the major physical effects of global warming (melting, retreat), this constitutes a major omission. Thus, the score is 2.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after after being used for a day.
|
<think>
The question focuses on depicting how a pencil would appear after being used for a day. Observing the question_image, the pencil is clean, sharp, and unused, with a bright yellow body and a pink eraser. The user likely wants to visualize the effects of daily use, such as wear, smudges, and marks.
To create the answer image, I would imagine the pencil after it has been sharpened, with a slightly worn yellow body and some marks or smudges near the tip, indicating usage. The eraser might remain intact but could show some minor wear or slight discoloration. The pencil would still be recognizable, but its pristine appearance would be compromised to reflect its usage.
When forming the answer text, I would describe the pencil's worn state and mention its functional marks, emphasizing the contrast between its original clean state and its current used condition. This aligns with the user's request to show the pencil after a day of use.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: The pencil in Image B (edited) shows a worn-down eraser, visible smudges, and marks near the tip, and the pencil tip is duller and slightly shorter compared to the pristine, unused pencil in Image A. The wood around the tip in Image B is also more jagged and darkened by graphite, indicating use. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The pencil should show typical signs of a day's use—shortened/duller tip, possibly a worn-down eraser, and some scuff marks or graphite stains near the tip area, while retaining the same pencil body. 3. Instruction Match: The correct object (the pencil) is retained, and all the relevant attributes that would change after a day's use are present: the pencil tip is not sharp, the eraser is reduced, and there are visible marks indicating handling and writing. 4. Decision: The edited image precisely matches the intended modification; all required signs of use are present. This is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw the appearance of the tool in the image as it would have looked a hundred years ago.
|
<think>
To address the request, I first observe the question_image, which shows a modern black landline telephone with a numeric keypad, a display screen, and a handset connected by a coiled cord. The question_text asks to depict the appearance of this tool a hundred years ago, implying a historical or vintage representation.
I consider the evolution of telephones over the past century. Early telephones were often simpler, with fewer features and a more mechanical design. For instance, they might have used a rotary dial instead of a numeric keypad, and the handset could have been made of wood or metal, with a less ergonomic design. The display screen would not have existed in the early days, as digital screens were not invented until much later.
In the answer_image, I would expect to see a vintage telephone resembling early 20th-century designs. This might include a wooden base, a large rotary dial, and a handset with a curved design. The image would likely depict the telephone on a wooden desk or table, emphasizing its historical context. The visual would aim to evoke a sense of nostalgia and contrast with the modern device in the question_image.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: Image A shows a modern push-button landline telephone with a plastic body, digital display, and coiled cord. Image B shows a much older style of telephone: a rotary dial, wooden and brass construction, and a very different, antique design for both the base and the handset. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the same tool (telephone) as it would have appeared approximately a hundred years ago (circa 1920s), which would typically be a rotary dial phone with a wooden or metal construction, more ornate and mechanical in appearance compared to modern plastic models. 3. Instruction Match: The correct object is still a telephone, but now accurately rendered as a model from about a hundred years ago. The rotary dial, materials, and overall style are period-appropriate. 4. Decision: The edit precisely matches the instruction to depict the tool as it looked a century ago, with all required historic details present. This is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looked like one hour ago.
|
<think>
The question asks to visualize the candle one hour ago based on its current state in the question image. Observing the question image, the candle is waxed down, with melted wax dripping off the sides, and a bright flame at the top. This suggests the candle has been burning for some time.
To reason about the candle's appearance one hour ago, I would consider the amount of wax that has been consumed. The wax appears to have melted significantly, so one hour ago, the candle would have been taller and less waxed down. The flame might have been smaller or less intense, as the wax would have been thicker and less volatile. Additionally, the base of the candle would likely have less wax buildup.
For the answer image, I would depict the candle as taller, with less wax dripping and a smaller flame. The wax would appear thicker and less melted, and the overall appearance would reflect a candle that has not burned as much as it does now. This reasoning aligns with the user's request to visualize the candle in its earlier state.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image B, the candle is much taller, with a longer unburned section, less melted wax, and a neater appearance compared to Image A, where the candle is shorter, has more melted wax, and has drips down the side. The flame is also present in both images, though its shape and size differ slightly. 2. Expected Visual Caption: If the instruction 'Draw what it looked like one hour ago' is perfectly followed, the candle should appear less burned, taller, with less melted wax and fewer drips, as it would have had more wax before burning for an hour. 3. Instruction Match: The edit correctly makes the candle appear less used, taller, and with minimal wax drips, accurately representing what the candle would look like one hour before the state in Image A. The correct object (the candle) is modified, not replaced, and the degree of change matches the time context implied by the instruction. 4. Decision: The edit fulfills the instruction perfectly with no notable omissions or inaccuracies, so the score is 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looked like three hours later.
|
<think>
The question involves an hourglass with blue sand and asks to visualize its state after three hours of passage. From the question_image, I observe the hourglass is upright with sand evenly divided between the upper and lower bulbs. The sand's color is bright blue, and the hourglass is framed by a wooden structure with black metal supports.
To reason through the answer, I consider the typical behavior of an hourglass: the sand flows from the upper bulb to the lower bulb at a steady rate. After three hours, the sand would have flowed downward, leaving less sand in the upper bulb and more in the lower bulb. The sand level would be closer to the bottom of the upper bulb, with some sand still in transit through the narrow neck.
For the answer image, I would depict the hourglass with the upper bulb containing significantly less blue sand, while the lower bulb has a larger accumulation. The sand's flow would appear dynamic, with some sand still in the process of descending. The wooden and metal frame should remain unchanged, maintaining the original structure and aesthetic.
This reasoning ensures the user's request is addressed by visually representing the hourglass's state after three hours of sand flow.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the hourglass has most of the blue sand in the upper chamber, with only a small amount accumulated in the lower chamber. In Image B, the majority of the blue sand has moved to the lower chamber, with very little remaining in the upper chamber. The hourglass itself and its surroundings remain unchanged. 2. Expected Visual Caption: If three hours had passed, the hourglass should appear as if all or nearly all of the sand has passed from the top chamber to the bottom chamber, indicating significant passage of time. 3. Instruction Match: The edit correctly depicts the same hourglass with the sand having almost completely emptied from the top and filled the bottom, exactly as would be expected after three hours. The correct object is modified, and the degree of change fully matches the intended time progression. 4. Decision: The edit perfectly complies with the instruction; all changes are accurate and present.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looked like 24 hours earlier.
|
<think>
To address the question, I first observe the question_image, which shows a butterfly emerging from its chrysalis. The chrysalis is partially transparent, revealing the butterfly's wings and body underneath. The question_text asks to visualize what the scene looked like 24 hours earlier, implying the transformation process of the butterfly.
The reasoning involves understanding the butterfly's life cycle. Before emerging, the butterfly was inside the chrysalis, undergoing metamorphosis. The answer_image should depict the chrysalis in its earlier stage, with the butterfly still inside, unrecognizable as a butterfly. The image should focus on the chrysalis structure, the butterfly's body inside, and any visible details such as the chrysalis's attachment to the plant.
The answer_text would describe this earlier stage, emphasizing the chrysalis and the butterfly still enclosed within it. The answer_image should clearly show the chrysalis with the butterfly inside, capturing the transformation process visually. This approach aligns with the user's request to explore the earlier stage of the butterfly's life.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: Image A shows a monarch butterfly emerging from its chrysalis, with the chrysalis split open and the butterfly's wings and body already visible and partially free. Image B shows a chrysalis that is still mostly intact, with the butterfly only faintly visible inside; the wings are not yet unfolded and the transformation appears to be at an earlier stage of metamorphosis. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should depict the same chrysalis and butterfly but at an earlier stage—24 hours before emergence—so the chrysalis should be unopened, with the butterfly less developed or not yet emerged, and its wings less distinct. 3. Instruction Match: The edit correctly reverts the scene to an earlier point in the metamorphosis process, with the chrysalis still closed and the butterfly not yet emerged. The correct object (the same chrysalis and butterfly) is depicted in the appropriate earlier state. 4. Decision: The edit fulfills the instruction precisely, showing what the scene would look like 24 hours earlier. This is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after one minute in a blender.
|
<think>
The question involves visualizing the transformation of the blended ingredients in the blender after one minute. The question_image shows a blender containing sliced bananas, strawberries, and raspberries, suggesting the preparation of a smoothie or similar mixture. The user likely wants to see how these ingredients would look once blended.
To reason through this, I consider the blending process: the fruits would mix into a smooth, uniform liquid. The final texture should be creamy and consistent, with the vibrant reds and yellows of the strawberries and bananas blending into a visually appealing mixture. The blender's blades should be visible, indicating the blending action.
The answer_image should depict the blender with a smooth, liquid mixture, showing the fruits fully integrated into a uniform texture. The liquid should retain some fruit particles for realism, and the blender's blades should be in motion, emphasizing the blending process. This visual representation aligns with the user's request for a depiction of the mixture after one minute.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the blender contains clearly identifiable chunks of banana and strawberry, unblended and distinct. In Image B, the contents are mostly blended together into a smooth, creamy mixture with only a few small chunks of fruit visible, and the overall texture is much more liquid and uniform. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After one minute in a blender, the fruit should appear mostly blended into a smoothie-like liquid, with perhaps a few small fruit fragments remaining, and the mixture should look homogeneous and creamy. 3. Instruction Match: The edit correctly transforms the distinct fruit pieces into a blended mixture, accurately reflecting what the blender's contents would look like after one minute of blending—mostly smooth with some possible small chunks. The correct objects (fruit) are modified as expected, and the degree of blending is appropriate for the instruction. 4. Decision: The edit perfectly complies with the instruction, so the score is 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what they will look like after drying naturally for a day.
|
<think>
The question image shows jeans hanging on a line outdoors, with water dripping from them, indicating they are freshly washed and still wet. The question_text asks for a visualization of how they will look after drying naturally for a day. This implies the final image should depict the jeans in a dry state, with no visible water or dripping.
To reason through this, I would consider the natural drying process, which typically involves the jeans losing their moisture and becoming smooth and wrinkle-free. The final image should show the jeans hanging in the same position, but without water dripping or puddles forming on the ground. The background and setting should remain consistent with the original image, maintaining the outdoor environment and the line with wooden pegs.
When forming the answer image, I would ensure the jeans appear dry, with no wetness or water trails. The folds and creases should be more defined, and the colors should appear vibrant and uniform. The ground should no longer have puddles, and the overall scene should reflect a fully dried state, aligning with the user's request for a natural drying outcome.
</think>
| 1
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the pants and cloth hanging on the line appear wet, with visible water dripping from them, and the ground below is wet with puddles directly beneath the clothes. In Image B, the pants and cloth are still present, but there is little to no change in their appearance regarding dryness; they still look similarly wet and water continues to visibly drip from them, with puddles still present beneath. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After drying naturally for a day, the clothes should appear dry—no dripping water, no wet or shiny patches, and the ground beneath should not show fresh puddles caused by dripping. The fabric texture should look dry and matte, not clinging to itself or showing signs of moisture. 3. Instruction Match: The correct objects are still present and in the same positions, but the key requested attribute—dryness after a day—has not been achieved. The clothes still look wet, and the visual cues (dripping water, puddles) are unchanged. 4. Decision: Because the image does not reflect the drying process or show the expected results of being left out to dry for a day, this is a case of non-compliance with the instruction.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looked like two months ago.
|
<think>
To address the user's request, I first analyze the question_image, which shows a well-maintained garden with rows of vegetables and a clear pathway. The question_text asks for a depiction of what the garden looked like two months ago, implying a change in growth or appearance over time.
I consider the seasonal and growth stages of the plants. The garden appears lush and green, suggesting it is in a healthy growth phase, possibly during spring or summer. Two months ago, the garden might have been in an earlier stage of development, with smaller or less dense plant growth. The pathways could have been less worn, and the surrounding vegetation might not be as mature.
For the answer_image, I would visualize the garden with smaller, younger plants occupying the rows, possibly with fewer mature vegetables. The pathways might show less foot traffic, and the garden could appear less vibrant due to the earlier stage of growth. The overall scene would reflect a less developed state compared to the current image.
This reasoning ensures the final answer aligns with the user's request to show the garden in its earlier growth phase two months ago.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: Image A shows a lush, fully grown vegetable garden with mature plants, dense green foliage, and organized rows. Image B depicts the same area, but the soil is mostly bare, with only small seedlings or young sprouts visible in neat rows; the plants are much smaller and more sparsely distributed. The garden appears at a much earlier stage of growth. 2. Expected Visual Caption: If the scene were shown as it looked two months ago, we would expect to see a much less developed garden: small seedlings or freshly planted crops, with little plant mass and more visible soil. 3. Instruction Match: The edit correctly transforms the scene from mature plants to an early stage of growth, matching the expected appearance from two months prior. The arrangement of rows and overall layout are consistent, with only the plant maturity and density changed, as appropriate for the instruction. 4. Decision: The edit faithfully and accurately fulfills the instruction to 'draw what it looked like two months ago.' Therefore, this is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after one hour on a hot grill.
|
<think>
To address the request, I first analyze the question_image, which shows fresh corn on the cob with vibrant yellow kernels and green husks. The question_text asks to visualize how the corn will look after one hour on a hot grill. This implies a transformation from raw to grilled, with changes in color, texture, and appearance.
Considering the grilling process, the kernels will likely turn golden brown, with some areas appearing darker or slightly charred due to the heat. The husks might also change, potentially becoming slightly crispy or showing signs of browning. The grilled corn could have grill marks or slight discoloration on the husk, indicating the grilling process.
When forming the answer_image, I would depict the corn with a golden-brown hue on the kernels, some areas darker for a realistic charred look. The husk might appear slightly shriveled or browned in places, with grill marks visible. The overall presentation should convey the texture and appearance of well-grilled corn, ensuring the transformation is visually evident.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: The corn in Image B shows significant charring and browning on the kernels, especially along the top, with dark grill marks and a toasted appearance. The rest of the corn and the husks remain visually unchanged from Image A. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After one hour on a hot grill, the corn should display visible browning, blackened grill marks, charred spots, and an overall cooked/toasted appearance, while retaining its original shape and structure. 3. Instruction Match: The correct object (the exposed ear of corn) has been modified, not replaced. The requested attribute (showing the effects of grilling for one hour) is accurately depicted, with heavy charring and appropriate color changes consistent with grilling. The degree of modification is also appropriate for an hour on a hot grill. 4. Decision: The edit precisely matches the instruction, with all required changes present and accurate. Therefore, the score is 5 for perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after one year of being frequently opened and closed.
|
<think>
The question involves visualizing how a book's condition changes over time after frequent use. The question_image shows a book in good condition, with clean pages and a sturdy binding. The question_text asks to imagine the book after one year of being opened and closed regularly.
To reason about this, I consider the wear and tear that occurs when a book is used frequently. The pages might show signs of creasing or slight discoloration, while the binding could appear slightly frayed or loose. The spine might also show signs of bending or wear due to repeated opening and closing.
The answer_image would need to reflect these changes. It could show the book with slightly worn pages, a slightly bent or loose spine, and a more aged appearance. The cover might have subtle creases or a faded look, emphasizing the passage of time and frequent use. This aligns with the user's request to visualize the book's condition after a year of use.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the book is in pristine condition: the pages are clean and crisp, the spine and edges show no signs of wear, and there are no visible marks or damage. In Image B, the same book appears heavily worn: the pages are discolored and frayed, the spine is damaged with visible separation, the edges are dirty and bent, and the overall appearance is much more used and aged. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After a year of frequent opening and closing, the book should show significant signs of wear—worn and bent edges, possible fraying or slight tearing, discoloration or yellowing of pages, creased covers, and perhaps some dirt or smudges. 3. Instruction Match: The changes in Image B accurately reflect the expected effects of a year of frequent use: the correct object (the original book) is still present, but it now displays the appropriate degree and type of wear. The edit does not introduce unrelated changes or replace the object. 4. Decision: The modification precisely and fully matches the instruction, so the score is 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after a year placed in a high-school classroom.
|
<think>
The question_image shows a blank whiteboard mounted on a wall, with a potted plant nearby. The question_text asks for a depiction of the same setup after a year in a high-school classroom. This implies the need to envision how the environment has evolved, incorporating typical classroom elements and signs of usage.
To create the answer image, I would consider the following: the whiteboard might have faint markings or writing, suggesting frequent use. The surrounding area could include educational materials, such as posters, charts, or notes, which are common in a high-school setting. The potted plant might remain unchanged, as it is a static element in the scene. The floor could show signs of wear or foot traffic, and the lighting might appear slightly dimmer due to typical classroom ambiance.
The reasoning for the answer text would emphasize the transformation of the space into a functional and lived-in classroom environment, reflecting the passage of time and the utilization of the whiteboard for teaching and learning purposes. This approach aligns with the user's request for a realistic depiction of the scene after a year.
</think>
| 1
|
1. Detect Difference: The only noticeable differences between Image A and Image B are very subtle changes in lighting and color tone. The whiteboard, plant, and general setting remain almost identical. There are no visible additions of wear, markings, graffiti, residue, or other telltale signs of a year having passed in a high-school classroom environment. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After a year in a high-school classroom, the whiteboard would likely have some ghosting or marker stains, stray marks, smudges, possibly some writing or doodles, tape or residue, and the plant might show signs of wear, dust, or growth. The setting should look more 'used.' 3. Instruction Match: The instruction requests a visual representation of the scene after a year in a high-school classroom, implying significant visual cues of use or aging. The edit does not introduce any of these elements; it simply alters lighting and color slightly. 4. Decision: As there is no indication that time has passed or the environment has aged as instructed, this is a case of non-compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
This picture is observed from the Northern Hemisphere. Draw what it will look like 7 days later.
|
<think>
To address the question, I first note that the question_image shows a crescent moon, which is a waxing crescent phase. The question_text asks what the moon will look like 7 days later, implying a progression in the lunar cycle. The lunar cycle spans about 29.5 days, so 7 days is roughly a quarter of the cycle.
The moon’s appearance changes as it progresses through phases: waxing crescent, first quarter, waxing gibbous, full moon, waning gibbous, last quarter, and waning crescent. In 7 days, the moon will likely be in the first quarter phase, where half of the moon is illuminated.
For the answer_image, I would depict the moon in its first quarter phase, showing a clear division between illuminated and dark areas. The image should maintain the same black background for consistency and focus on the moon’s details, such as craters and texture. The answer_text would describe this phase, confirming the lunar cycle progression.
</think>
| 1
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the moon is shown as a first quarter phase (right half illuminated), with clear detail and proper proportions. In Image B, the moon is distorted: it is misshapen (not circular), the illumination pattern is inconsistent, and the lunar surface features appear warped and inaccurate. The moon appears to be a roughly left-half illuminated shape, but its edge is fuzzy and the phase does not correspond to a real lunar phase. 2. Expected Visual Caption: 7 days after the first quarter moon (as seen in Image A, Northern Hemisphere), the moon should be full, i.e., a full circular disk, fully illuminated. 3. Instruction Match: The edit does not show a full moon; instead, it shows a distorted, crescent-like or gibbous moon with unrealistic shape and surface. The correct object (the moon) is present, but its phase is incorrect, and the representation is inaccurate. 4. Decision: Because the instruction is not followed at all—the correct lunar phase (full moon) is not depicted, and the shape is not even close—the score is 1 for non-compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after a week in a fish tank with algae growth.
|
<think>
To address the question, I first observe the original image, which depicts a fish tank with a castle-like structure, plants, and a single fish swimming. The question asks for an imagined transformation after a week of algae growth, suggesting the need to visualize how the tank's appearance changes over time.
Algae growth typically results in a greenish or murky appearance due to the accumulation of algae on surfaces, plants, and decorations. The tank's clarity and vibrancy would likely diminish as the algae spreads. The castle structure and plants might appear partially covered in green, and the fish could be surrounded by a slightly hazy environment.
When forming the answer image, I would depict the tank with a noticeable increase in algae coverage on the castle, plants, and decorations. The water might appear murkier, and the fish could be less visible due to the algae's density. The overall atmosphere should reflect a natural progression of algae growth, with the tank's aesthetic shifting toward a more subdued and overgrown look.
</think>
| 3
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image B, there are large, bright green-yellow patches covering much of the castle ornament, gravel, and even some of the background. The fish is missing. The patches are irregular and have a smeared appearance, distinct from the more focused, realistic algae or biofilm growth one would expect. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After a week in a fish tank with algae growth, the ornament and tank surfaces should show naturalistic, thin, greenish algae films and patches, especially on surfaces near light, but not overwhelming or uniformly covering large areas. The fish and plants should mostly remain visible and unaffected. 3. Instruction Match: The edit attempts to add algae, but applies it too broadly and in an unnatural, almost painted or blurry manner, rather than as realistic algae buildup. The coverage is excessive for a week and not consistent with typical early algae growth patterns. Additionally, the fish is missing, which is not part of the instruction. 4. Decision: The idea of algae growth is present, but the execution is unrealistic and lacks detail; the main concept is there but key aspects (realism, degree, and distribution of algae) are incorrect or incomplete. This constitutes partial compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like 5 seconds later.
|
<think>
The question involves predicting the state of the traffic light 5 seconds after the current state. Observing the question_image, the traffic light is currently displaying an amber (yellow) signal. In standard traffic light sequences, amber typically transitions to red after a few seconds.
To reason through this, I would consider the typical timing of traffic light signals. Amber usually lasts for a short period, often around 2-3 seconds, before turning red. Therefore, in 5 seconds, the amber light would likely transition to red, and the green light would remain off.
The answer_image would depict the traffic light with the red signal illuminated, while the amber and green signals remain off. The background and structure of the traffic light would remain consistent, but the color change would be the primary focus.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the yellow/amber light is illuminated on the traffic signal, while in Image B, the yellow light is off and the red light is illuminated. No other elements of the image have changed. 2. Expected Visual Caption: If the instruction 'Draw what it will look like 5 seconds later' is followed, the traffic light should change from yellow (amber) to red, as is standard traffic signal sequence. The environment and traffic light structure should remain unchanged. 3. Instruction Match: The edited image exactly matches the expected change: the illuminated light has switched from yellow to red, reflecting the typical progression of a traffic signal after 5 seconds. The correct object (the same traffic light) is modified, and only the light color has changed as intended. 4. Decision: The change is accurate and complete, so this is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looked like six months ago.
|
<think>
To address the request, I focus on the transformation of the belly from its current state to what it looked like six months ago. The question image shows a visibly pregnant belly, which suggests the person is in the later stages of pregnancy. The goal is to depict the belly in a less pronounced state, representing the earlier phase of pregnancy.
When conceptualizing the answer image, I would visualize a belly that is noticeably smaller and less rounded, indicating a six-month difference. The posture and clothing should remain consistent with the original image to maintain continuity. The belly should appear smoother and less stretched, with the skin texture appearing less stretched and more toned. The hands should still be placed gently on the belly to reflect the nurturing gesture.
The answer image should convey a sense of growth and development, showing the progress from the earlier stages of pregnancy to the later stages. This approach ensures the transformation is clear while maintaining the context and emotional connection to the subject.
</think>
| 1
|
1. Detect Difference: Comparing Image A to Image B, the most noticeable difference is that in Image B, the woman's pregnant belly appears slightly larger and more pronounced. The hand positions have also changed slightly, with the left hand now under the belly instead of to the side, and the pose is slightly altered (torso rotated, hip position shifted). 2. Expected Visual Caption: If the instruction 'Draw what it looked like six months ago' were followed, the belly should appear significantly less pronounced or not pregnant at all, as six months prior to this late-stage pregnancy the woman would have either a smaller bump (early pregnancy) or a flat stomach (pre-pregnancy), depending on gestational age. 3. Instruction Match: The observed change does not match the instruction at all. Instead of making the stomach less pregnant or flat to reflect the passage of six months backward, the edit has made the belly even larger and more obviously pregnant, which is the opposite of the intended effect. 4. Decision: Since the modification does not fulfill the instruction and, in fact, contradicts it, this is a 1 for non-compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like in spring.
|
<think>
To address the request, I first observe the question_image, which depicts a leafless tree in a snowy landscape, suggesting it is winter. The question_text asks to imagine what this tree will look like in spring, implying a transformation from barren branches to a blossoming tree.
For the answer image, I would envision the tree covered in vibrant green leaves, with clusters of colorful flowers or blossoms. The snow on the ground would be replaced by a lush, grassy area, and the atmosphere would shift to a warmer, brighter tone, reflecting springtime. This transformation should emphasize the tree's full and healthy appearance.
The final answer_text would describe the tree in full bloom, with vivid details of its blossoms and leaves, and the surrounding environment would be transformed into a lively spring scene. The answer image would depict the tree in full bloom, surrounded by green grass and colorful flowers, creating a vivid contrast to the barren tree in winter.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the tree is bare with no leaves or flowers, and the ground is covered in snow, indicating a winter scene. In Image B, the tree has abundant light green foliage and many bright pink flowers, and the snow has been replaced with lush green grass, suggesting a spring landscape. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should replace the winter environment with signs of spring: the tree should show fresh green leaves and possibly blossoms or flowers, and the ground should be green rather than snow-covered. 3. Instruction Match: The correct object (the tree and its surroundings) has been modified. The requested seasonal attributes—new leaves, visible flowers, and a green lawn—are all present and clearly indicate spring. The degree of modification is accurate and visually matches what is expected for spring. 4. Decision: The edit fulfills the instruction precisely, so the score is 5 for perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after 30 minutes.
|
<think>
To reason through the question, I first observe the question_image, which shows a pot of liquid on a stove, likely milk or cream, heating up. The question_text asks about the appearance of the liquid after 30 minutes, implying a transformation due to heat exposure.
Considering the context, the liquid is likely to undergo a change such as curdling or separating into distinct layers. This is common when milk or cream is heated to high temperatures, especially if it contains proteins or other ingredients that coagulate.
The answer image would need to depict the liquid in a state of separation, with a clear layering effect. The top layer might appear thicker or creamier, while the bottom layer could be thinner or more fluid. The image should also retain the pot and stove setup to maintain continuity with the original scene.
The final answer_text would describe the transformation, emphasizing the separation and the resulting texture or appearance of the liquid. This aligns with the user's request for a visual representation of the liquid after 30 minutes of heating.
</think>
| 2
|
1. Detect Difference: The main visual difference between Image A and Image B is that the steam above the pot has diminished or nearly disappeared in Image B, and the lighting appears slightly different. The level of milk in the pot, the pot itself, and its position on the stove remain almost unchanged. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After 30 minutes of simmering or boiling, the milk should show a noticeably reduced volume due to evaporation, possible changes in color (slightly darker or with a skin forming), and perhaps visible residue or bubbling around the edges of the pot. 3. Instruction Match: The instruction asks for what the scene would look like after 30 minutes. The edit only changes the appearance of the steam (reducing it), but does not reflect the expected consequences of 30 minutes of cooking—such as reduced milk level, possible residue, skin, or additional bubbling. The core visual cues of passage of time and simmering are missing. 4. Decision: The main signs of 30 minutes having passed are not present, so this is a major omission, resulting in a score of 2.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
The image shows a coin in motion, draw what it will look like after ten seconds.
|
<think>
The question image shows a coin in motion, tilted at an angle, and the user wants to visualize its appearance after ten seconds. The coin's motion suggests it will likely rotate further or settle into a new position.
To reason about the final image, I consider the coin's current tilt and the direction of its motion. After ten seconds, the coin might have rotated further or settled upright. The answer image should depict the coin in a stable position, possibly upright or tilted slightly, depending on the motion's dynamics.
The final image should maintain the same background and lighting as the question image, ensuring consistency. The coin's surface details, including the embossed design, should remain clear and intact, emphasizing its metallic texture. The answer image should reflect the coin's new position after the passage of time, with a focus on realism and continuity.
</think>
| 2
|
1. Detect Difference: The coin in Image A is shown standing upright at a slight angle, with its face clearly visible and illuminated. In Image B, the coin appears to be in a very similar upright position but with a slightly different angle and possibly some minor lighting change. There is no drastic difference in position, orientation, or state (such as lying flat or showing motion blur) between the two images. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After ten seconds of motion, a coin that was initially spinning or rolling upright would most likely have toppled and come to rest lying flat on the surface, or at the very least be depicted mid-fall or on its edge about to settle. 3. Instruction Match: The instruction requests an illustration of what the coin will look like after ten seconds in motion, implying a passage of time and a change of state from upright motion to rest or near-rest. The edit only changes the angle very slightly, and the coin remains upright, which is not consistent with realistic physics or the spirit of the instruction. 4. Decision: The edit does not show the required state change after ten seconds. Some minimal difference is present, but the main requirement is not met. This is a major omission, so the score is 2.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after three months of daily use.
|
<think>
The question involves visualizing the state of a wooden cutting board after three months of daily use. From the question_image, I observe a clean, new cutting board with a smooth surface and no visible wear. The question_text suggests the user wants to see the board's appearance after prolonged use, implying wear, scratches, and potential discoloration.
To create the answer, I would imagine the board showing signs of daily use—scratches from knives, possible staining from food residue, and a slightly worn texture. The edges might appear rounded or chipped due to frequent handling. The color could appear slightly darker or faded in areas where it has been exposed to moisture or food particles.
The answer_image should depict these characteristics: scratches across the surface, a slightly worn texture, and a more muted color tone. The edges might look rounded or slightly frayed, and there could be minor discoloration or stains. This visual representation aligns with the idea of a cutting board that has been actively used over time.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: Image A shows a new, clean, unblemished wooden cutting board with a smooth surface and light color. Image B depicts the same cutting board, but now it has numerous scratches, discoloration, and darkened, worn edges. The surface looks marked and used, with visible signs of wear and tear. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After three months of daily use, the cutting board should show significant surface scratches, possible staining or discoloration, and general wear, especially at the edges and corners, but should remain structurally the same object. 3. Instruction Match: The edit applies wear and tear to the correct object (the cutting board), showing scratches and usage marks consistent with daily use over three months. The correct attributes—surface damage, discoloration, and edge wear—are all present and appropriately rendered. 4. Decision: The edit fulfills the instruction precisely; all required changes are present and accurate. This is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after being continuously played for a month.
|
<think>
The question asks to visualize what the vinyl record looks like after being played for a month. The question_image shows a clean vinyl record with a red label, indicating it is in pristine condition. The user likely wants to see the wear and tear caused by continuous use.
To reason through this, I consider the physical effects of playing a record: scratches, scuffs, and wear on the grooves, especially near the center where the needle rests. The grooves may appear more worn, and the label might show signs of dust or dirt accumulation. The tone arm and stylus should also show signs of use, such as slight discoloration or dust buildup.
The answer image should depict these effects. The vinyl record might have visible scratches and scuffs, with the grooves appearing less smooth. The label could have dust or dirt, and the tone arm and stylus might look slightly worn or dirty. These details should align with the user's request to show the record after prolonged use.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the vinyl record appears new, with a clean and glossy surface and an intact, bright red label. In Image B, the record shows clear signs of wear: the label is noticeably scuffed and faded, and there are visible marks and scratches on the vinyl surface itself. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The record should appear worn from continuous play for a month—this typically means a dulled or damaged label, visible scratches, surface wear, and a general loss of the pristine look. 3. Instruction Match: The correct object (the record and its label) has been modified, not replaced. The attributes (surface quality, label condition) have been changed to depict realistic signs of extended use, accurately reflecting what a record might look like after a month of continuous play. 4. Decision: The edit precisely matches the intended modification, showing all appropriate wear without introducing unrelated changes. This is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after 50 years.
|
<think>
To address the question, I first observe the question_image, which shows an old wooden boat lying submerged in water. The question_text asks for a depiction of what the boat will look like after 50 years. This implies a transformation of the boat due to natural decay and environmental factors.
Considering the aging process, I would expect the boat to undergo significant deterioration. The wood would likely become more weathered, with visible cracks, splintering, and discoloration. The structure might also show signs of collapse or disintegration, especially if the boat is partially buried in the sediment. The surrounding environment would likely contribute to the decay, with algae or marine growth potentially covering parts of the boat.
For the answer_image, I would depict the boat in a state of advanced decay, with its wooden structure splintered, fragmented, and partially submerged in sediment. The surrounding water would remain clear, but the boat would appear fragile and fragile, with visible signs of prolonged exposure to water and environmental elements. This aligns with the idea of a 50-year passage and emphasizes the effects of time and natural forces on the boat.
</think>
| 4
|
1. Detect Difference: The main difference between Image A and Image B is the appearance of the boat: in Image B, the wood looks more aged, with visible dark patches, some surface decay, and growths such as algae or barnacles present, especially along the edges and crossbeams. The overall structure remains intact, but there is clear visual wear and the onset of biological colonization. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After 50 years underwater, the boat should appear significantly aged, with pronounced wood decay, possibly broken or missing planks, heavy colonization by algae, barnacles, or other marine life, discoloration, and an overall dilapidated look, possibly even partially collapsed or buried. 3. Instruction Match: The edit introduces signs of age and underwater exposure (discoloration, some decay, and biological growth), but the structure of the boat remains almost perfectly intact with no major collapse, missing pieces, or advanced structural decay that would be expected after 50 years. The edit addresses the core idea but doesn't fully realize the level of deterioration expected for a five-decade submersion. 4. Decision: This is a minor omission; the boat is aged but not to the full extent implied by 'after 50 years'. Therefore, score is 4.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after the seasons have fully cycled twice.
|
<think>
The question asks to visualize the forest after two full seasonal cycles. The initial image shows a vibrant autumn scene with orange and yellow leaves, suggesting the transition from summer to fall. To address the request, I would imagine the forest in winter, where the trees are bare and the ground is covered in snow.
The answer image should depict a stark contrast to the original, with snow blanketing the ground and the trees stripped of leaves. The lighting should appear colder and subdued, emphasizing the winter atmosphere. The path in the foreground would still be visible, but it would be covered in snow, creating a serene and quiet winter scene.
This transformation aligns with the seasonal cycle, showcasing the forest in its dormant state after two cycles of growth and decay. The final image would focus on capturing the stillness and coldness of winter, contrasting with the warmth and vibrancy of autumn.
</think>
| 2
|
1. Detect Difference: Image A shows a forest path in autumn, with vibrant orange and yellow leaves on the trees and ground. Image B depicts the same path and trees, but in a winter scene: the trees are bare, there is snow on the ground, and the overall color palette is cold and blueish. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The instruction asks to 'draw what it will look like after the seasons have fully cycled twice.' This means the scene should show the original setting, but as it would appear after the passage of two full years—implying the same season (autumn) should be depicted again, perhaps with some subtle differences (such as slightly different foliage density, growth, or aging), but not a different season. 3. Instruction Match: The edit changes the season from autumn to winter, failing to represent the cyclical return to the same season after two full cycles. Instead, it presents a single seasonal transition, not the completion of two cycles. 4. Decision: Since the main instruction (return to the same state after two full cycles) is not followed and only a different season is shown, this is a major omission, resulting in a score of 2.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like in twenty years.
|
<think>
To address the question, I first observe the question_image, which shows a modern apartment building with contemporary design elements such as large glass windows, balconies, and clean lines. The question_text asks for a depiction of what this building will look like in twenty years, implying a futuristic or advanced architectural style.
To reason about the answer, I consider advancements in sustainable and innovative design trends. Twenty years could see the integration of green technology, such as solar panels, vertical gardens, or energy-efficient materials. The structure might incorporate more dynamic and adaptive features, like self-healing surfaces or smart glass that changes color or transparency based on environmental conditions. Additionally, the building could include advanced features like smart home automation, improved structural resilience, and integration with urban infrastructure.
For the answer image, I would visualize the building with a futuristic aesthetic, featuring sleek, curved lines, extensive use of greenery, and advanced materials. The surrounding environment might include urban enhancements, such as elevated pathways, green rooftops, and a more integrated landscape. The lighting could emphasize the building's innovative features, with dynamic lighting effects or futuristic displays.
The final answer image would likely depict a modern, eco-friendly, and technologically advanced version of the original building, showcasing cutting-edge design elements that align with future architectural trends.
</think>
| 1
|
1. Detect Difference: Image A shows a conventional mid-rise apartment building with a simple, modern but functional design, regular balconies, and muted colors. Image B, by contrast, depicts a dramatically different structure: it is a futuristic building with sweeping, organic forms, abundant vegetation, glass features, unconventional shapes, and integrated blue-lit elements. The entire architectural style, materials, and form factor have changed. 2. Expected Visual Caption: If the instruction 'Draw what it will look like in twenty years' were perfectly followed, Image B should show the same building with realistic signs of 20 years of aging or plausible updates: perhaps some weathering, matured landscaping, renovations, new façade treatments, or moderate technological upgrades, but the building's essential structure, form, and identity should be recognizably the same. 3. Instruction Match: The edit in Image B does not retain the original building at all; it replaces it with an entirely new and unrecognizable structure. There is no continuity of the original building's design, and no logical progression from the current state to a plausible 20-year future—the object (the building) has been replaced, not evolved. 4. Decision: The instruction is not followed at all; the edit is a complete transformation rather than a projection of the original into the future. This is a clear case of non-compliance, so the appropriate score is 1.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after a day.
|
<think>
The question asks for the appearance of the box after a day, implying changes due to environmental factors like weather or time progression. The question_image shows an open cardboard box floating on water, which suggests it could be exposed to elements like rain or sunlight.
To reason about the final answer, I consider how the box might change over time. If exposed to rain, the box could become wet, with water stains or visible water droplets on its surface. If exposed to sunlight, the cardboard might appear slightly darker due to fading or discoloration. The water surrounding the box could also show more pronounced ripples or changes in reflection.
The answer_image should depict the box after a day, likely with water stains or signs of water exposure, and the surrounding water could have a slightly different appearance due to ripples or reflections. The lighting might also appear softer, suggesting a transition from daylight to a later time of day. The box's position on the water could remain unchanged, but the visual details should reflect the passage of time and environmental effects.
</think>
| 2
|
1. Detect Difference: The only visible change between Image A and Image B is the presence of some dark, wet-looking stains on the cardboard box in Image B, particularly on the flaps and the sides above the waterline. The box shape, position, and structure remain the same. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After a day, a cardboard box floating on water should show significant deterioration: the box would likely be soggy, warped, partially or fully collapsed, and possibly sinking or submerged, with much more extensive water damage than just some stains. 3. Instruction Match: The edit only adds minor wet marks, but does not show the expected extensive breakdown after a day in water—no collapse, deformation, or major soaking. The core effect of a full day’s exposure is missing. 4. Decision: Since almost all the required change (major box deterioration) is missing or poorly implemented and only slight superficial wetting is shown, this is major omission, so score 2.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after five years of continuous use.
|
<think>
The question asks for a depiction of the keyboard after five years of continuous use, implying wear and aging effects. Observing the question_image, the keyboard appears clean and well-maintained, suggesting it is in good condition initially. The user likely wants to visualize how the keyboard might look after prolonged use, including signs of wear such as dirt, discoloration, or damage.
To construct the answer, I would consider common aging effects on keyboards: dust accumulation on keys, potential scuffs or scratches on the casing, and faded or worn-out lettering. The image should reflect these changes, showing a less pristine appearance compared to the original. The answer_image would likely depict a slightly dirty keyboard with some discoloration or wear marks, especially on the edges or corners, to emphasize the passage of time.
The answer_text would describe these aging effects, focusing on the contrast between the original clean state and the worn-out look after five years. This approach ensures the user's request for a realistic depiction of aging is met.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: Image B shows significant visual changes compared to Image A: the keyboard in Image B is now dirty and stained, with visible grime, discoloration, and worn key legends. The keys appear to have accumulated dirt, some keys are more faded or partially illegible, and there are brownish stains and marks, especially on high-contact areas like the spacebar, ALT, and CTRL keys. In contrast, Image A shows a perfectly clean, pristine keyboard with crisp, clear legends. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After five years of continuous use, the keyboard should show signs of heavy wear: dirt and grime build-up, worn or faded key legends, discoloration, possible stains, and general evidence of long-term use on commonly touched keys. 3. Instruction Match: The changes made in Image B match exactly what is expected for a keyboard after five years of continuous use. The correct object is modified (the same keyboard), and the degree and type of wear (dirt, fading, stains) are accurate for the instruction. 4. Decision: All required changes are present and accurate, so this is a 5 for perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looked like during rush hour.
|
<think>
To address the user's request, I first examine the question_image, which shows an aerial view of a complex highway interchange. The image features multiple lanes, ramps, and intersections, with a relatively sparse number of vehicles. The question_text asks for the appearance of this interchange during rush hour, implying a need to visualize increased traffic and congestion.
For the answer image, I would imagine a similar aerial view of the interchange but with a significant increase in the number of vehicles. This would include more cars, buses, and potentially trucks, filling the lanes and ramps. The image should convey congestion, with vehicles closely packed together and some appearing to be stuck in traffic. The ramps and intersections might show more pronounced bends or curves due to the density of vehicles.
The final answer text would describe this busy scene, emphasizing the increased traffic volume and the chaotic nature of rush hour. The answer image would visually depict this, showing a dense network of vehicles on the interchange, illustrating the contrast between the calm, empty scene in the question_image and the bustling environment of rush hour.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the highway interchange has very few cars, with lanes mostly empty and traffic flowing smoothly. In Image B, the same interchange is densely packed with cars on nearly all visible lanes, many of which are at a standstill or moving very slowly, indicative of a traffic jam. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The scene should show the interchange during rush hour, which would be characterized by heavy traffic, cars packed closely together, and likely gridlock or significant congestion on most, if not all, lanes. 3. Instruction Match: The edit directly addresses the instruction to depict rush hour. The correct object (the highway interchange) remains the same, and the change is the presence and density of vehicles, matching rush hour conditions perfectly. There are no missing details related to the instruction, as the visual cues of rush hour (very heavy traffic, congestion) are all present. 4. Decision: The edited image fulfills the instruction exactly and in full detail, so the score is 5 for perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looked like during the Jurassic period.
|
<think>
To address the question, I first observe the question_image, which shows a dinosaur skeleton in a museum setting. The dinosaur appears to be a theropod, likely a Tyrannosaurus rex or similar species, given its bipedal stance, sharp teeth, and clawed feet. The question_text asks for a depiction of what the creature looked like during the Jurassic period, implying a need for a prehistoric, lifelike representation.
For the answer_image, I would focus on creating a realistic and detailed depiction of the dinosaur in its natural Jurassic environment. This would include elements like vegetation, such as ferns and coniferous trees, as well as a setting that reflects the era's climate, such as a lush, prehistoric forest or a riverbank. The dinosaur should be portrayed in a dynamic pose, such as walking or hunting, to emphasize its predatory nature.
The final answer_text would describe the dinosaur in a lifelike manner, highlighting its physical features, such as its powerful jaws, sharp claws, and muscular build. The answer_image would likely show the dinosaur in a vivid, prehistoric landscape, with its body covered in realistic skin texture and coloration, such as a mix of greens and browns, to match the Jurassic period's ecological context.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: Image A shows a dinosaur skeleton displayed in a museum setting, with bones exposed and surrounded by modern interior elements (paintings, lighting, walls). Image B depicts a fully-fleshed dinosaur with skin and musculature, standing in a lush, prehistoric forest environment, with no modern artifacts or context. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image, per the instruction 'Draw what it looked like during the Jurassic period,' should show the dinosaur as it would have appeared alive—covered in skin, possibly with scales or feathers, in a natural prehistoric landscape (forest, ferns, etc.), not as a fossil or in a museum. 3. Instruction Match: The edit replaces the skeleton display with a lifelike, fleshed-out dinosaur in a fitting Jurassic environment, directly and fully addressing the instruction—transforming the fossil to a living creature in its time. The correct object (the dinosaur) is not replaced with a different species, its body is reconstructed accurately as a living animal, and the environmental context is appropriately Jurassic. 4. Decision: The change is complete and faithful to the instruction, so this is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looks like during the Mid-Autumn Festival.
|
<think>
The question image shows a crescent moon in a dark sky, symbolizing a night scene. The question text asks for a transformation to depict the Mid-Autumn Festival, which traditionally involves a full moon. To achieve this, the crescent moon in the question image must be replaced with a full moon, ensuring it is centered and bright against the same dark sky. The stars in the background should remain consistent to preserve the night atmosphere. The answer image should reflect the festive and celebratory mood of the Mid-Autumn Festival by maintaining the moon's prominence and the overall night sky aesthetic.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: Image A shows a crescent moon with some stars in the night sky. Image B shows a full moon centered in the night sky, with a dark background and no visible stars. 2. Expected Visual Caption: During the Mid-Autumn Festival, the moon is typically depicted as a bright, round, full moon in the night sky, as this festival celebrates the harvest moon, which is full. 3. Instruction Match: The editing instruction is to draw what it looks like during the Mid-Autumn Festival. The main visual hallmark of this festival is the presence of a full moon. The edit transforms the crescent moon into a full moon, directly matching the cultural and visual expectation for the Mid-Autumn Festival. No extraneous elements are introduced or omitted. 4. Decision: The change is precisely what the instruction requests, so this is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looked like at sunrise.
|
<think>
The user wants the scene to reflect the appearance of the city at sunrise. To achieve this, the lighting and color tones in the image should change to warmer hues like orange, pink, and yellow, representing the soft glow of sunrise. The sky should be adjusted to show a gradient from darker tones near the horizon to lighter shades higher up. The sun should be repositioned to appear lower on the horizon, casting long shadows and creating a softer, more diffused light. The cityscape and road layout should remain unchanged to preserve the structure of the original image.
</think>
| 4
|
1. Detect Difference: The edited image (Image B) displays a strong reddish-pink hue across the sky and overall scene, giving a warmer tint. The sun remains in a similar high position as in Image A, and the city layout and shadows are unchanged. 2. Expected Visual Caption: For a sunrise, the sun should be low on the horizon, casting long shadows, and the sky should exhibit warm tones such as pink, orange, or red, often with a soft glow near the horizon. The city should appear to be illuminated from a low angle. 3. Instruction Match: The edit adds a warm, reddish sunrise-like color cast, matching sunrise colors, but the position of the sun remains high in the sky—more typical of midday than sunrise. The color and atmosphere are correct, but the sun's position does not accurately depict sunrise. 4. Decision: Since the core atmospheric change is made (color and light quality), but the critical detail of the sun's placement is incorrect, this is a minor omission. Score: 4.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like during the next king tide.
|
<think>
To address the question, I first observe the provided question_image, which depicts a serene tropical beach with clear skies, calm waters, and a few scattered clouds. The question_text asks to visualize the scene during the next king tide, implying a significant tidal event where water levels rise dramatically.
King tides typically occur during the full or new moon, when the gravitational pull of the moon and sun aligns, causing higher high tides and lower low tides. This results in a visually striking contrast between the water and the land, often flooding coastal areas.
For the answer image, I would depict the same beach but with the water level significantly higher, flooding the shoreline and surrounding areas. The waves would be more turbulent, and the sky might appear darker or more ominous to reflect the intense tidal event. The palm trees and vegetation would be partially submerged, emphasizing the dramatic impact of the king tide. The image should evoke a sense of power and change, contrasting with the calmness of the original scene.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: The edited image (Image B) shows a dramatic increase in water level, with large waves washing much further up the beach compared to the original. The sky has also become overcast and darker, suggesting stormy or high-tide conditions. The shoreline is now partially submerged, and the sea encroaches much higher onto the sand. 2. Expected Visual Caption: During a king tide, the water should be much higher than normal, with large waves and the ocean encroaching further onto the land, possibly under dark or stormy skies, and much less visible sandy beach. 3. Instruction Match: The edit accurately depicts a king tide scenario by raising the water significantly, showing large, forceful waves, and altering the sky to fit the atmosphere of such an event. The correct setting (the same beach) is preserved, and only the relevant environmental factors are changed. 4. Decision: The requirements of the instruction are fully met with appropriate visual changes, so the score is 5 for perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw the appearance of the Olympic opening ceremony held at this venue.
|
<think>
The question_image shows a large stadium with a track and field layout, likely a venue for major sporting events. The question_text asks for the appearance of the Olympic opening ceremony held at this location. This implies the user wants a depiction of the grand scale and ceremonial atmosphere of the opening ceremony.
To reason about the answer, I consider the iconic elements of an Olympic opening ceremony, such as a massive stage, fireworks, and a large audience. The stadium's design, with its circular seating and open roof, would be central to the visual representation. The answer image would likely feature a vibrant stage setup, fireworks lighting up the sky, and a crowd of spectators filling the stadium, all emphasizing the grandeur and scale of the event.
The description of the answer image would include details like the stage's elaborate design, the colors of the fireworks, and the crowd's enthusiasm. The image should convey the energy and spectacle of the opening ceremony, capturing the essence of the event held in this iconic venue.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: Image A shows an empty, well-lit stadium in daylight with no people, decorations, or activity. Image B shows the same stadium at night, filled with a large crowd, elaborate stage decorations, bright colored lights, and fireworks overhead. The track is covered or replaced by a performance area and stage. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should depict the Olympic opening ceremony at the venue, including a full audience, prominent stage setup, elaborate lighting, pyrotechnics, and the festive atmosphere typical of such an event. 3. Instruction Match: The edit introduces all major expected changes: crowd-filled stands, a central stage/performance area, colorful lighting, and fireworks, accurately transforming the empty stadium into an Olympic opening ceremony scene without altering the stadium's core architecture. 4. Decision: All required elements are present and rendered as expected for an Olympic opening ceremony, thus this is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looked like 1800 years ago.
|
<think>
To address the question, I focus on the historical context of the Colosseum and its appearance during its prime. The question_image shows the Colosseum in its current state, with visible ruins and modern elements. The user asks what it looked like 1800 years ago, implying the need to visualize its original glory.
Historically, the Colosseum was a bustling hub of entertainment and architecture during the Roman Empire. It housed gladiatorial contests, animal hunts, and public spectacles, with thousands of spectators filling its grand tiers. The structure would have been intact, with no visible damage or decay, and the arches and columns would have been pristine.
The answer image should depict the Colosseum in its prime, with vibrant colors, intact walls, and a bustling crowd of people. The lighting would likely be natural daylight, and the structure would appear majestic and well-maintained. The image should convey the scale and grandeur of the Colosseum during its peak era, emphasizing its role as an iconic Roman landmark.
</think>
| 1
|
1. Detect Difference: Image A shows the interior ruins of the Colosseum as it exists today, with missing sections, exposed substructures, and modern interventions. Image B shows the exterior of the Colosseum, also in a ruined current state, with large sections of the outer wall missing and modern crowds in the foreground. 2. Expected Visual Caption: If the instruction 'Draw what it looked like 1800 years ago' were perfectly followed, the edited image (Image B) should depict the Colosseum as it appeared in its original, intact state—complete circular structure, undamaged stonework, all tiers and decorations present, no modern intrusions or visible ruins, and without modern crowds. 3. Instruction Match: The edit changes the viewpoint from interior to exterior, but still represents the current (ruined) state of the Colosseum, with missing walls and clear signs of centuries of decay. There is no restoration to the original appearance. The main requirement—to show the Colosseum as it looked 1800 years ago—has not been addressed at all. 4. Decision: As the edit does not comply with the instruction in any significant way, this is a clear case of non-compliance. Score: 1.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looked like on the morning of election day.
|
<think>
To address the request, I observe the original question_image, which depicts a well-maintained city hall building under clear skies. The question_text asks to visualize the scene on the morning of election day, implying a change in atmosphere and activity.
For the answer image, I would imagine the building with subtle alterations to reflect the morning of an election day. This could include elements such as a slightly overcast sky to suggest early morning or a softer light, possibly with the presence of election-related signs or posters on the building's walls. Additionally, the steps and surrounding area might have a few people or election-related banners to indicate activity and preparation for voting.
The answer image should maintain the structure and layout of the city hall but incorporate these subtle details to convey the specific time and event. The final image should evoke a sense of anticipation and preparation for the day's activities.
</think>
| 1
|
1. Detect Difference: The main visual change between Image A and Image B is the alteration of the sky: in Image A, the sky is bright with scattered fluffy clouds, while in Image B, the sky appears darker and overcast, with a more dramatic, cloudy atmosphere. The rest of the scene—the building, banners, trees, flag, and general environment—remains unchanged, with no visible additions such as people, decorations, signage, or other morning-of-election-day activity. 2. Expected Visual Caption: On the morning of election day, city halls are typically busy: there would likely be crowds of people gathering, campaign signs, voting booths or signage, perhaps lines of voters, volunteers, or police presence, and a general sense of activity and anticipation. The environment should reflect the unique and specific atmosphere of election day morning, not just a change in lighting or weather. 3. Instruction Match: The instruction specifically calls for a depiction of what the city hall looked like on the morning of election day. Merely changing the sky to appear gloomier does not fulfill the instruction; it neither adds any election-specific elements nor suggests a morning scene. No evidence of election activity or morning-specific details are present in the edit. 4. Decision: Because the edit does not address the core of the instruction (visualizing election day morning with appropriate context and activity), this is a case of non-compliance. Score: 1.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after 30 minutes.
|
<think>
To address the question, I first analyze the initial setup in the question_image. It shows a pendulum suspended from a stand, swinging back and forth. The question_text asks for the appearance of the pendulum after 30 minutes, implying the pendulum has completed several cycles of motion.
The physics of pendulum motion suggests that after a certain number of swings, the pendulum will return to its original position. Given the context, 30 minutes is likely sufficient time for the pendulum to complete multiple cycles, returning to its initial state.
For the answer_image, I would depict the pendulum in its original position, with the ball hanging straight down from the string. The stand and base remain unchanged, and the background continues to be the same light blue color. This ensures consistency with the original setup while visually confirming the pendulum’s motion completion.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the pendulum ball is positioned higher and to the left, indicating it is at the start of its swing. In Image B, the pendulum ball is hanging lower and closer to the vertical center, as if it has come to rest. There is also a faint circular mark or indentation on the wooden base in Image B, which was not present in Image A, possibly indicating where the ball has settled after swinging. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After 30 minutes, the pendulum should have lost energy and come to rest, hanging straight down from the stand, with the ball at its lowest point. There may also be a mark on the base where the ball has been resting. 3. Instruction Match: The change to the pendulum's position (from angled and elevated to hanging straight down) matches the expected physical result after 30 minutes. The addition of a mark on the base is a plausible result of the ball resting in one place for a long time and adds realism. The correct object is modified, and the degree of modification is accurate. 4. Decision: The edit precisely fulfills the intent of 'Draw what it will look like after 30 minutes,' showing the pendulum at rest. Therefore, the score is 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like in snowy winter.
|
<think>
To address the request, I first observe the question_image, which depicts a dense forested area with greenery and some visible water bodies. The question_text asks for a transformation of this scene into a snowy winter setting.
To create the answer_image, I imagine the forest covered in snow, with white replacing the greenery. The water bodies would likely appear frozen, reflecting the winter atmosphere. The surrounding terrain, including any visible roads or structures, would also be blanketed in snow.
The final answer_image would feature a serene, snow-covered landscape with the forest's natural contours still visible. The snow would create a smooth, uniform layer across the entire scene, emphasizing the cold, wintry environment. This transformation aligns with the user's request for a snowy winter depiction.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: Image A is a lush, green landscape with visible vegetation and patches of buildings, rendered in deep greens and earthy tones. Image B shows the same landscape but is now almost entirely covered in white and light blue hues, simulating snow. The underlying forms and shapes remain consistent, but all elements are obscured or transformed by a heavy layer of white, with the green and brown tones almost completely replaced by snowy whites and cool colors. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should depict the same landscape as Image A, but transformed to look like it is covered in snow, with most surfaces blanketed in white, and a general wintery, cold atmosphere dominating the scene. 3. Instruction Match: The edit successfully transforms the original image into a snowy winter scene. The visual effect convincingly covers the landscape in snow, matching the instruction to 'Draw what it will look like in snowy winter.' No major aspects of the instruction are omitted or incorrectly executed. 4. Decision: The transformation is comprehensive and accurate, so this is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw this scene after 1 year of active construction.
|
<think>
To address the user's request, I first analyze the question_image, which depicts an active construction site with visible excavation, machinery, and uneven terrain. The question_text asks for the scene to be visualized after one year of active construction, implying a transformation from the current state to a completed or advanced stage of development.
In reasoning about the final answer, I consider the typical progression of construction projects. After one year, the site would likely show significant structural progress, such as the foundation of buildings, completed walls, or partially constructed frameworks. The machinery and equipment may still be present, but the area would appear more organized and structured compared to the initial state.
The answer_image should reflect these changes. It would likely include completed buildings, neatly arranged construction materials, and a more defined layout of the site. The surrounding environment, such as roads and greenery, would remain consistent, but the focus would shift to the developed structures and the overall transformation of the site. This visual representation aligns with the user's request for a depiction after one year of construction activity.
</think>
| 5
|
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the site is mostly bare earth with excavation equipment, trenches, earthworks, and construction vehicles; there are no visible buildings or major constructed structures. In Image B, several large building frameworks are present, and the site looks significantly more developed, with multiple structures at various stages of construction occupying the previously empty or excavated areas. The earthworks and layout remain consistent, but the scene now includes substantial progress indicating ongoing construction. 2. Expected Visual Caption: After one year of active construction, the scene should display partially or mostly completed building frameworks, clear signs of development such as walls or foundations, and less open excavation compared to the initial site. 3. Instruction Match: The edit correctly adds substantial building progress to the scene, with multiple new structures where there were none before. The changes directly address the instruction to show the site after one year of construction. The correct objects (buildings) are added in realistic positions, and the degree of construction progress is plausible for a one-year timeframe. 4. Decision: The edited image faithfully fulfills the instruction with all required changes present and accurate. Therefore, the score is 5 (Perfect Compliance).
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 43