id
int64 1
546k
| paper_arxiv_id
stringlengths 10
13
| path
stringlengths 1
249
⌀ | caption
stringlengths 9
170k
⌀ | label
stringlengths 6
192
⌀ | name
float64 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
499
|
2508.00380
|
figs/ablation/#1_2.pdf
|
\caption{Rosenbrock (200D)}
| null | null |
500
|
2508.00380
|
figs/ablation/#1_3.pdf
|
\caption{Rastrigin (200D)}
| null | null |
501
|
2508.00380
|
figs/ablation/#1_4.pdf
|
\caption{Levy (200D)}
| null | null |
502
|
2508.00380
|
figs/ablation/#1_5.pdf
|
\caption{Landing (12D)}
| null | null |
503
|
2508.00380
|
figs/ablation/#1_6.pdf
|
\caption{Rover (60D)}
| null | null |
504
|
2508.00380
|
figs/ablation/#1_7.pdf
|
\caption{Walker (198D)}
| null | null |
505
|
2508.00380
|
figs/ablation/#1_8.pdf
|
\caption{Ant (404D)}
| null | null |
506
|
2508.00380
|
figs/ablation/#1_legend.pdf
| null | null | null |
507
|
2508.00331
|
figures/token_examples/susc_21_wikipedia_en_pos240_endoftext.pdf
|
\caption{
\textbf{The rainbow serpent: UMAP projection of susceptibility vectors.} (Top) Each point represents a token $y$ in context $x$, positioned according to its 16-dimensional susceptibility vector $\eta_w(xy)$ computed for a 3M parameter language model (one dimension per attention head) at the end of training ($49900$ steps). Token sequences $xy$ are colored by pattern, see \cref{tab:token-patterns}. We mark the anterior-posterior (PC1) and dorsal-ventral (PC2) axes with black lines (Bottom) Susceptibility vector $\eta_w(xy)$ showing each head in order \protect\attentionhead{0}{0}-\protect\attentionhead{0}{7} (gray) \protect\attentionhead{1}{0}-\protect\attentionhead{1}{7} (black) and the token $y$ (black outline) in its context $x$.
}
|
\label{fig:rainbow_serpent}
| null |
508
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/umap_2d_overview_12_pclines_nolabels.png
| null | null | null |
509
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/umap_2d_overview_12_pclines_nolabels.png
| null | null | null |
510
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/umap_2d_overview_12_step900.png
| null | null | null |
511
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/umap_2d_overview_12_step9000.png
| null | null | null |
512
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/umap_2d_overview_12_step17500.png
| null | null | null |
513
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/umap_2d_overview_12_step49900.png
| null | null | null |
514
|
2508.00331
|
figures/appendix/pps_appx_1.pdf
| null | null | null |
515
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/umap_2d_overview_12_step900.png
| null | null | null |
516
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/umap_2d_overview_12_step9000.png
| null | null | null |
517
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/umap_2d_overview_12_step17500.png
| null | null | null |
518
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/umap_2d_overview_12_step49900.png
| null | null | null |
519
|
2508.00331
|
figures/appendix/pps_appx_1.pdf
| null | null | null |
520
|
2508.00331
|
figures/pattern_distribution_heatmap_with_std.pdf
|
\caption{\textbf{Per-token susceptibility PCA} showing mean and standard deviation of loadings of principal components on data patterns across $10$ independent draws of $20000$ tokens from each dataset. The data matrix is the same as that used for UMAP, see \cref{appendix:umap}. The number $30.2$ appearing in ``Top 1\% Negative'' for word start tokens in PC1 means that when we order the tokens in PC1 with negative coefficients by magnitude, 30.2\% of those in the top 1\% by magnitude are word start tokens.}
|
\label{fig:pattern_dist_heatmap_std}
| null |
521
|
2508.00331
|
figures/spacing/spacing_tokens_2d_step900.png
| null | null | null |
522
|
2508.00331
|
figures/spacing/spacing_tokens_2d_step9000.png
| null | null | null |
523
|
2508.00331
|
figures/spacing/spacing_tokens_2d_step17500.png
| null | null | null |
524
|
2508.00331
|
figures/spacing/spacing_tokens_2d_step49900.png
| null | null | null |
525
|
2508.00331
|
figures/spacing/spacing_tokens_2d_step900.png
| null | null | null |
526
|
2508.00331
|
figures/spacing/spacing_tokens_2d_step9000.png
| null | null | null |
527
|
2508.00331
|
figures/spacing/spacing_tokens_2d_step17500.png
| null | null | null |
528
|
2508.00331
|
figures/spacing/spacing_tokens_2d_step49900.png
| null | null | null |
529
|
2508.00331
|
figures/space_bars.pdf
|
\caption{\textbf{Average spacing token susceptibilities.} The average per-token susceptibilities for spacing tokens is shown, conditional on the minimal number of preceding spacing tokens. Colors range from green (1) to black (80). Susceptibilities are measured at the end of training (49900 steps).}
|
\label{fig:spacing-bars}
| null |
530
|
2508.00331
|
figures/dataset_pattern_distribution.pdf
|
\caption{Percentages of tokens in each dataset which follow a given pattern. Note that not all patterns are mutually exclusive.}
|
\label{fig:distribution_pattern}
| null |
531
|
2508.00331
|
figures/lm-fig1-top.pdf
|
\caption{\label{fig:stages}
\textbf{Developmental stages of the language model.}
Critical points in the local learning coefficient (LLC) curve mark boundaries between distinct \emph{developmental stages} (bottom row; warm hues for increasing LLC, cold for decreasing LLC).
}
| null | null |
532
|
2508.00331
|
figures/appendix/pca_fig.png
|
\caption{A 3D visualization of the first three principal components is shown for the same per-token susceptibility data used to generate the UMAP serpents. Note that the different axes were automatically rescaled.}
|
\label{fig:3d-pca}
| null |
533
|
2508.00331
|
figures/appendix/thicc.png
|
\caption{The distribution of tokens projected onto PC2 in susceptibility space, separated into induction pattern tokens and all other tokens.}
|
\label{fig:thicc}
| null |
534
|
2508.00331
|
figures/spacing/spacing_tokens_by_type_step900.png
| null | null | null |
535
|
2508.00331
|
figures/spacing/spacing_tokens_by_type_step9000.png
| null | null | null |
536
|
2508.00331
|
figures/spacing/spacing_tokens_by_type_step17500.png
| null | null | null |
537
|
2508.00331
|
figures/spacing/spacing_tokens_by_type_step49900.png
| null | null | null |
538
|
2508.00331
|
figures/spacing/spacing_tokens_by_type_step900.png
| null | null | null |
539
|
2508.00331
|
figures/spacing/spacing_tokens_by_type_step9000.png
| null | null | null |
540
|
2508.00331
|
figures/spacing/spacing_tokens_by_type_step17500.png
| null | null | null |
541
|
2508.00331
|
figures/spacing/spacing_tokens_by_type_step49900.png
| null | null | null |
542
|
2508.00331
|
figures/spacing/space_count_histogram.pdf
|
\caption{Histogram of the number of spacing tokens preceding a spacing token, in the approximately 42k spacing tokens found in the set of 260k sampled token sequences.}
|
\label{fig:umap_spacing_hist}
| null |
543
|
2508.00331
|
figures/appendix/checkpoint_comparison_2x2_v2.pdf
|
\caption{The average per-token susceptibilities for spacing tokens is shown across four checkpoints, conditional on the minimum number of preceding spacing tokens. Colors range from green (1) to black (80).}
|
\label{fig:umap_spacing_bars_2x2}
| null |
544
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/seed2/umap_2d_overview_12_step900.png
| null | null | null |
545
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/seed2/umap_2d_overview_12_step9000.png
| null | null | null |
546
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/seed2/umap_2d_overview_12_step17500.png
| null | null | null |
547
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/seed2/umap_2d_overview_12_step49900.png
| null | null | null |
548
|
2508.00331
|
figures/appendix/pps_appx_2.pdf
| null | null | null |
549
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/seed2/umap_2d_overview_12_step900.png
| null | null | null |
550
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/seed2/umap_2d_overview_12_step9000.png
| null | null | null |
551
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/seed2/umap_2d_overview_12_step17500.png
| null | null | null |
552
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/seed2/umap_2d_overview_12_step49900.png
| null | null | null |
553
|
2508.00331
|
figures/appendix/pps_appx_2.pdf
| null | null | null |
554
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/seed3/umap_2d_overview_12_step900.png
| null | null | null |
555
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/seed3/umap_2d_overview_12_step9000.png
| null | null | null |
556
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/seed3/umap_2d_overview_12_step17500.png
| null | null | null |
557
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/seed3/umap_2d_overview_12_step49900.png
| null | null | null |
558
|
2508.00331
|
figures/appendix/pps_appx_3.pdf
| null | null | null |
559
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/seed3/umap_2d_overview_12_step900.png
| null | null | null |
560
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/seed3/umap_2d_overview_12_step9000.png
| null | null | null |
561
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/seed3/umap_2d_overview_12_step17500.png
| null | null | null |
562
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/seed3/umap_2d_overview_12_step49900.png
| null | null | null |
563
|
2508.00331
|
figures/appendix/pps_appx_3.pdf
| null | null | null |
564
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/seed4/umap_2d_overview_12_step900.png
| null | null | null |
565
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/seed4/umap_2d_overview_12_step9000.png
| null | null | null |
566
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/seed4/umap_2d_overview_12_step17500.png
| null | null | null |
567
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/seed4/umap_2d_overview_12_step49900.png
| null | null | null |
568
|
2508.00331
|
figures/appendix/pps_appx_4.pdf
| null | null | null |
569
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/seed4/umap_2d_overview_12_step900.png
| null | null | null |
570
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/seed4/umap_2d_overview_12_step9000.png
| null | null | null |
571
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/seed4/umap_2d_overview_12_step17500.png
| null | null | null |
572
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/seed4/umap_2d_overview_12_step49900.png
| null | null | null |
573
|
2508.00331
|
figures/appendix/pps_appx_4.pdf
| null | null | null |
574
|
2508.00331
|
figures/pca/pc_loadings_seed1.pdf
|
\caption{\textbf{Head loadings of per-token susceptibility PCA for seed $1$.} In \citet[Appendix G]{wang2024differentiationspecializationattentionheads} it was found that in this seed the previous-token heads are \protect\attentionhead{0}{1} and \protect\attentionhead{0}{4}, the current-token head is \protect\attentionhead{0}{5} and the induction heads are \protect\attentionhead{1}{6} and \protect\attentionhead{1}{7}.}
|
\label{fig:pattern_dist_heatmap_seed1}
| null |
575
|
2508.00331
|
figures/pca/pc_loadings_seed2.pdf
|
\caption{\textbf{Head loadings of per-token susceptibility PCA for seed $2$.} In \citet[Appendix G]{wang2024differentiationspecializationattentionheads} it was found that in this seed the previous-token head is \protect\attentionhead{0}{1}, the current-token head is \protect\attentionhead{0}{6} and the induction head is \protect\attentionhead{1}{0}.}
|
\label{fig:pattern_dist_heatmap_seed2}
| null |
576
|
2508.00331
|
figures/pca/pc_loadings_seed3.pdf
|
\caption{\textbf{Head loadings of per-token susceptibility PCA for seed $3$.} In \citet[Appendix G]{wang2024differentiationspecializationattentionheads} it was found that in this seed the previous-token head is \protect\attentionhead{0}{4}, the current-token head is \protect\attentionhead{0}{2} and the induction head is \protect\attentionhead{1}{6}.}
|
\label{fig:pattern_dist_heatmap_seed3}
| null |
577
|
2508.00331
|
figures/pca/pc_loadings_seed4.pdf
|
\caption{\textbf{Head loadings of per-token susceptibility PCA for seed $4$.} In \citet[Appendix G]{wang2024differentiationspecializationattentionheads} it was found that in this seed the previous-token heads are \protect\attentionhead{0}{0} and \protect\attentionhead{0}{3}, the current-token head is \protect\attentionhead{0}{6} and the induction heads are \protect\attentionhead{1}{1} and \protect\attentionhead{1}{3}.}
|
\label{fig:pattern_dist_heatmap_seed4}
| null |
578
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/umap_2d_overview_01_pc.png
| null | null | null |
579
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/umap_2d_overview_02_pc.png
| null | null | null |
580
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/umap_2d_overview_01_pc.png
| null | null | null |
581
|
2508.00331
|
figures/umap/umap_2d_overview_02_pc.png
| null | null | null |
582
|
2508.00331
|
figures/token_examples/susc_22_wikipedia_en_pos409_It.pdf
|
\caption{
\textbf{Token streaks.} Susceptibility vector $\eta_w(xy)$ showing each head in order \protect\attentionhead{0}{0}-\protect\attentionhead{0}{7} (gray) \protect\attentionhead{1}{0}-\protect\attentionhead{1}{7} (black) and the token $y$ (black outline) in its context $x$. The examples are taken from the streaks (A)-(E) identified in \cref{fig:umap_other_angles}. Note the similarity of the susceptibility vectors of the tokens \tokenbox{the}, \tokenbox{to}, \tokenbox{and}.
}
|
\label{fig:token_streaks}
| null |
583
|
2508.00458
|
figure/receiver.eps
|
\caption{Schematic of a RA receiver. The vapor cell contains ground-state atoms that are excited to Rydberg states via coupling and probe lasers. Incoming RF signals interact with these Rydberg atoms, modifying the transmission of the probe laser that is subsequently detected by the photodetector.}
|
\label{receiver}
| null |
584
|
2508.00458
|
figure/CS1_no_b.eps
|
\caption{\label{fig:constellation}Visualization of LOAM constellation points with $M =4$ and the phase of $c$ is selected from the discrete set $\{0, \frac{\pi}{4}, \frac{\pi}{2}, \frac{3\pi}{4}\}$. (a) LO-free case showing constellation points co-linearly arranged along a ray from the origin. (b) Weak reference signal case displaying non-symmetrically distributed constellation points with the first point $x_{1}$ anchored at $c$. (c) Strong reference signal case showing symmetrically distributed constellation points centered around the origin.}
| null | null |
585
|
2508.00458
|
figure/CS1_no_b.eps
| null | null | null |
586
|
2508.00458
|
figure/CS1_small_b.eps
| null | null | null |
587
|
2508.00458
|
figure/CS1_large_b.eps
| null | null | null |
588
|
2508.00458
|
figure/A2_Constellation_Comparison_LOfree_M4.eps
|
\caption{\label{fig03} SER performance comparison between the proposed LOAM scheme and conventional modulation schemes (PAM, QAM, PSK) under different reference signal conditions and constellation sizes. Top row (a-c): $4$-point constellations ($M=4$). Bottom row (d-f): $64$-point constellations ($M=64$).}
| null | null |
589
|
2508.00458
|
figure/A2_Constellation_Comparison_LOfree_M4.eps
| null | null | null |
590
|
2508.00458
|
figure/A2_Constellation_Comparison_LOsmall_M4.eps
| null | null | null |
591
|
2508.00458
|
figure/A2_Constellation_Comparison_LOlarge_M4.eps
| null | null | null |
592
|
2508.00458
|
figure/A2_Constellation_Comparison_LOfree_M64.eps
| null | null | null |
593
|
2508.00458
|
figure/A2_Constellation_Comparison_LOsmall_M64.eps
| null | null | null |
594
|
2508.00458
|
figure/A2_Constellation_Comparison_LOlarge_M64.eps
| null | null | null |
595
|
2508.00519
|
./HBondImp_ev.eps
|
\caption{Band structure of a tight-binding model with a Hermitian bond impurity for a system of $L=32$ as a function of $t'$. As $t'=1$ two states, one from the bottom, one from the top of the band, separate from the overall band. We calculated the bulk-boundary correspondence indicator ($D_L(\epsilon)$) and found it to be divergent for these states, but not for any of the others.}
|
\label{fig:HBondImp_ev}
| null |
608
|
2508.00646
|
img/results_q3_tool_acceptance_stacked.pdf
|
\caption{Digital Tool Acceptance (n=5)}
|
\label{fig:q3_tool_acceptance}
| null |
825
|
2508.00355
|
figures/RL_evaluate_modify.pdf
| null | null | null |
596
|
2508.00519
|
./HBondImp_D.eps
|
\caption{Bulk-boundary correspondence indicator, $D_L(\epsilon)$ for a Hermitian system with a Hermitian bond impurity. Panel (a) shows $D_L(\epsilon)$ as a function of $t'$ for all states for three system sizes. As $t'$ increases above $t'=1$ for a certain set of states $D_L(\epsilon)$ diverges. The larger the system size, the steeper the increase. Panel (b) shows $D_L(\epsilon)$ as a function of the energy eigenvalue, for two values of $t'$, $t'=0.5,1.6$. The arrows indicate the extremal states which separated from the band and are localized for $t'=1.6$.}
|
\label{fig:HBondImp_D}
| null |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.