id
int64 1
546k
| paper_arxiv_id
stringlengths 10
13
| path
stringlengths 1
249
⌀ | caption
stringlengths 9
170k
⌀ | label
stringlengths 6
192
⌀ | name
float64 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
100
|
2008.03847
|
fig14.pdf
|
\caption{The phase diagram of chiral symmetry and confinement in the
$N_{f}^{\text{cr}}$ vs $T_{c}$ for various values of $eB$.
The $N_{f}^{\text{cr}}$ is obtained from the
thermal gradient of the chiral condensate $\partial_T \left\langle \bar{\psi} \psi
\right\rangle^{1/3} (N_f,eB,T)$ and of the confining scale
$\partial_T \widetilde{\tau}_{\text{IR}}^{-1}(N_f,eB,T)$.}
|
\label{Fig14}
| null |
101
|
2008.03847
|
fig15.pdf
|
\caption{Magnetic field dependent coupling of Eq.~(\ref{fceB}).}
|
\label{Fig15}
| null |
102
|
2008.03847
|
fig16.pdf
|
\caption{The thermal gradient of the chiral condensate $\partial_T \left\langle \bar{\psi} \psi
\right\rangle^{1/3} (N_f=2,eB,T)$ has been plotted as a function of $T$ for various values of $eB$ using the magnetic field dependent coupling
of Eq.~(\ref{fceB}).
It now exhibits IMC. For higher $T$, chiral symmetry breaking occurs at lower values of $eB$.}
|
\label{Fig16}
| null |
103
|
2008.03847
|
fig17.pdf
|
\caption{The phase diagram of chiral symmetry and confinement for
$N_{f}^{\text{cr}}$ vs $T_{c}$ at finite $eB$ obtained with an $eB$-dependent
coupling of Eq.~(\ref{fceB}).
The $N_{f}^{\text{cr}}$ is
obtained from the thermal gradient of the chiral condensate
$\partial_T \left\langle \bar{\psi} \psi \right\rangle^{1/3} (N_f,eB,T)$ and
of the confining scale
$\partial_T \widetilde{\tau}_{\text{IR}}^{-1}(N_f,eB,T)$}
|
\label{Fig17}
| null |
104
|
2008.03847
|
fig18.pdf
|
\caption{The thermal gradient of the chiral condensate $\partial_T \left\langle \bar{\psi} \psi
\right\rangle^{1/3} (N_f=2,eB,T)$ has been plotted as a function of $T$ for various values of $eB$ using the magnetic field and temperature dependent coupling
of Eq.~(\ref{fceBT}).
It again exhibits IMC.}
|
\label{Fig18}
| null |
105
|
2008.03847
|
fig19.pdf
|
\caption{The phase diagram of chiral symmetry and confinement for
$N_{f}^{\text{cr}}$ vs $T_{c}$ at finite $eB$ obtained now with an $(eB,T)$-dependent
coupling of Eq.~(\ref{fceBT}).}
|
\label{Fig19}
| null |
106
|
2508.00602
|
images/approach/leaksealer_approach.pdf
|
\caption{Visual representation of the LeakSealer approach.}
|
\label{fig:leaksealer}
| null |
107
|
2508.00602
|
images/experiments/Static/static_openai.pdf
|
\caption{OpenAI dataset}
|
\label{fig:prc_static_openai}
| null |
108
|
2508.00602
|
images/experiments/Static/static_toxicchat.pdf
|
\caption{ToxicChat dataset}
|
\label{fig:prc_static_toxic}
| null |
109
|
2508.00602
|
images/experiments/Static/static_pii.pdf
|
\caption{PII dataset}
|
\label{fig:prc_static_pii}
| null |
110
|
2508.00602
|
images/experiments/Static/static_openai.pdf
|
\caption{OpenAI dataset}
|
\label{fig:prc_static_openai}
| null |
111
|
2508.00602
|
images/experiments/Static/static_toxicchat.pdf
|
\caption{ToxicChat dataset}
|
\label{fig:prc_static_toxic}
| null |
112
|
2508.00602
|
images/experiments/Static/static_pii.pdf
|
\caption{PII dataset}
|
\label{fig:prc_static_pii}
| null |
113
|
2508.00602
|
images/appendices/cluster-example.png
|
\caption{Essential static LeakSealer Report.}
|
\label{fig:static-example-short}
| null |
114
|
2508.00602
|
images/experiments/Dynamic/dynamic_openai.pdf
|
\caption{OpenAI dataset}
|
\label{fig:prc_dynamic_openai}
| null |
115
|
2508.00602
|
images/experiments/Dynamic/dynamic_toxicchat.pdf
|
\caption{ToxicChat dataset}
|
\label{fig:prc_dynamic_toxic}
| null |
116
|
2508.00602
|
images/experiments/Dynamic/dynamic_pii.pdf
|
\caption{PII dataset}
|
\label{fig:prc_dynamic_pii}
| null |
117
|
2508.00602
|
images/experiments/Dynamic/dynamic_openai.pdf
|
\caption{OpenAI dataset}
|
\label{fig:prc_dynamic_openai}
| null |
118
|
2508.00602
|
images/experiments/Dynamic/dynamic_toxicchat.pdf
|
\caption{ToxicChat dataset}
|
\label{fig:prc_dynamic_toxic}
| null |
119
|
2508.00602
|
images/experiments/Dynamic/dynamic_pii.pdf
|
\caption{PII dataset}
|
\label{fig:prc_dynamic_pii}
| null |
120
|
2508.00602
|
images/appendices/cluster-example.png
|
\caption{Clusters from the ToxicChat test split. Static LeakSealer summary with outliers truncated to three examples.}
|
\label{fig:example-cluste}
| null |
121
|
2508.00228
|
figs/fig3-map.png
|
\caption{Network routes with different latencies interconnecting our DTNs}
|
\label{map}
| null |
122
|
2508.00228
|
figs/fig4-results-1-128-100.png
|
\caption{Network routes with different latencies interconnecting our DTNs}
|
\label{1-128-100}
| null |
123
|
2508.00228
|
figs/fig9-results-1-32-100.png
|
\caption{Distribution of throughput per number of streams across different RTTs}
|
\label{1-32-100}
| null |
124
|
2508.00228
|
figs/fig11-results-2-16-100.png
|
\caption{Total cores per server: 32, bandwidth limit: 100 Gbps}
|
\label{2-16-100}
| null |
125
|
2508.00228
|
figs/fig12-results-4-16-200.png
|
\caption{Total cores per server: 64, bandwidth limit: 200 Gbps}
|
\label{4-16-200}
| null |
126
|
2508.00228
|
figs/fig13-results-4-32-200.png
|
\caption{Total cores per server: 128, bandwidth limit: 200 Gbps}
|
\label{4-32-200}
| null |
127
|
2508.00228
|
figs/fig6-results-4-32-400.png
|
\caption{Total cores per server: 128, bandwidth limit: 400 Gbps}
|
\label{4-32-400}
| null |
128
|
2508.00228
|
figs/fig7-results-16-8-400.png
|
\caption{Network routes with different RTTs interconnecting our DTNs}
|
\label{16-8-400}
| null |
129
|
2508.00329
|
pics_s/LSA_a.jpg
|
\caption{\label{fig_LSA} Spatio-temporal profiles of perturbation $y_1$ showing that the mode with (a) $\alpha=2$ decays over time, while the mode with (b) $\alpha=10$ grows over time for $Q=80$ and $\delta=5$.
}
| null | null |
130
|
2508.00329
|
pics_s/r_f.jpg
|
\caption{{\it The reaction front position evolution for different flow rate $Q$, diffusivity ratio $\delta$ and disturbance wavenumber $\alpha$. The green dashed lines indicate corresponding stationary front position $r_s$.}}
|
\label{rf_LSA}
| null |
131
|
2508.00329
|
pics_s/IL_dhminrel700_m.pdf
|
\caption{{\it (a) $E_{I,m}(t)$ and (b) $E_{V,m}(t)$ for different $m$ values. The rest of the parameters are fixed as $Q=80$, $\delta=10$.}}
|
\label{mgridtest}
| null |
132
|
2508.00329
|
pics_s/surfXYvsX_dtQ160Delta10t_.jpg
|
\caption{\label{surfXY_Qeffect} (a) Surface plots of the autocatalyst $X$ at different times for $Q=160,\delta=10$, (b) the spatio-temporal evolution of reactant $Y$ for the same parameter values.}
| null | null |
133
|
2508.00329
|
pics_s/temporal_num.jpg
|
\caption{
(a) Temporal evolution of the reaction front position, \( r_f \), for \( Q = 80 \) and \( Q = 160 \) when \( \delta = 10 \).
(b) Temporal evolution of the wavelength, \( \lambda(t) \), for \( Q = 80 \) and \( Q = 160 \) when \( \delta = 10 \). Dashed lines indicate the mean wavelength, \( \lambda \).
(c) Temporal evolution of the amplitude, \( A(t) \), for \( Q = 80 \) and \( Q = 160 \) when \( \delta = 10 \). Dashed lines indicate the mean amplitude, \( A \).
}
|
\label{fig:temp_num}
| null |
134
|
2508.00329
|
pics_s/experimental_setup.pdf
|
\caption{\label{Fig: expset} Schematic of the experimental set-up.}
| null | null |
135
|
2508.00329
|
pics_s/figImageProcessing.pdf
|
\caption{\label{Fig: DataProcessing} (a) Original picture of the reactant solution Y, containing 30.6 mM of SPA, being continuously injected into the product solution X at a flow rate $\hat{Q}=1$ $\mu L$ $min^{-1}$, resulting in a stationary cellular front 10 mm away from the inlet. Scale bar: 10 mm. (b) Binarized image of the stationary front. (c) Outline of the front with the injection tube removed in the post-processing. (d) Comparison of the front position data in a radial coordinate set before and after FT-based filtering. The front's leading and trailing points are marked with upward and downward-facing triangles, respectively. The average front position is marked with a dashed red line.}
| null | null |
136
|
2508.00329
|
pics_s/temporal_exp.jpg
|
\caption{Temporal evolution of key observables in response to changes in flow rate $\hat{Q}$: (a) imposed flow rate $\hat{Q}$ over time, and resulting variations in (b) front position, (c) amplitude, and (d) wavelength during the experiments. Full blue lines represent experimental data, while dashed red lines represent their average value. While the dependence of the stationary front position $\hat{r}_s$ and the cellular modulation amplitude $\hat{A}$ on the flow rate $\hat{Q}$ are evident, there is no statistically significant relationship between the flow rate and the average modulation wavelength $\hat{\lambda}$.}
|
\label{fig:experiments_timelapse}
| null |
137
|
2508.05628v1
|
figs/segmentation_figure.pdf
|
\caption{Segmentation examples. H‑Net++ (bottom) correctly segments compound words and clitics, while BPE (top) over-fragments.}
|
\label{fig:segments}
| null |
138
|
2508.05628v1
|
figs/robustness_curves.pdf
|
\caption{Performance degradation under increasing ZWNJ corruption. H-Net++ maintains higher accuracy across all corruption levels.}
|
\label{fig:robustness}
| null |
139
|
2508.05628v1
|
figs/attention_patterns.pdf
|
\caption{Attention patterns in the Transformer mixer show long-range dependencies between morphologically related chunks.}
|
\label{fig:attention}
| null |
140
|
2508.00311
|
fig/ocr-fig-1.pdf
|
\caption{
Illustration of the main challenges in current LaTeX formula datasets: limited complexity and structural diversity. \textit{Left}: \textbf{Simple vs. Complex LaTeX Expressions.} Existing datasets primarily contain simple, single-structure formulas with few symbol types, which restricts model performance on advanced scientific content. In contrast, the proposed CSFormula dataset includes complex expressions with multi-level nesting, sophisticated subscripts and superscripts, and abundant scientific symbols, supporting more accurate recognition of diverse formulas. \textit{Right}: \textbf{Line-level vs. Page-level LaTeX Expressions.} Most datasets focus only on line-level formulas, overlooking the complex paragraph- and page-level layouts common in real documents. The proposed CSFormula dataset incorporates these higher-level structures, enabling models to better capture complex layouts and improving semantic reconstruction and document understanding.
}
|
\label{fig:motivation}
| null |
141
|
2508.00311
|
fig/ocr-fig-2.pdf
|
\caption{Visualization of DocTron-Formula’s recognition results. The top shows accurate recognition of complex, deeply nested LaTeX expressions, while the bottom demonstrates robust parsing of page-level layouts.}
|
\label{fig:qualitative}
| null |
142
|
2508.00539
|
Cupritframework.png
|
\caption{Overall workflow of the proposed phase-locked SNR-based band selection and spectral unmixing pipeline. The process consists of three stages: (1) Phase-locked spectral smoothing and SNR-guided band selection; (2) unsupervised endmember extraction and NNLS-based unmixing; and (3) abundance map generation and spectral similarity assessment with reference mineral spectra.}
|
\label{fig:framework}
| null |
143
|
2508.00539
|
RGBmaps.png
|
\caption{RGB composite rendering of the Cuprite hyperspectral scene.}
|
\label{fig:hsi_rgb}
| null |
144
|
2508.00539
|
Labcupritespectral.png
|
\caption{Reference spectra for 12 minerals in the Cuprite district from USGS laboratory measurements.}
|
\label{fig:lab_spectra}
| null |
145
|
2508.00539
|
500pixels.png
|
\caption{Cuprite Spectral before Unmixing}
|
\label{fig:sg_comparison}
| null |
146
|
2508.00539
|
spectralsignaturecomparison.png
|
\caption{Comparison between Raw Cuprite Spectral and Auto-extracted Spectral from HSI.}
|
\label{fig:spectral_signature}
| null |
147
|
2508.00539
|
SNRSpectralBandRetainedBandsHighlighted.png
|
\caption{Band-wise SNR distribution with selected high-SNR bands highlighted.}
|
\label{fig:snr_profile}
| null |
148
|
2508.00539
|
abundancemaps.png
|
\caption{Abundance maps for Classes 0–2 using filtered input and NNLS.}
|
\label{fig:abundance_maps}
| null |
149
|
2508.00476
|
figures/amr_man_sell_flower.png
|
\caption{AMR graph for ``A man breaks a window.''}
|
\label{fig:amr_graph}
| null |
150
|
2508.00476
|
figures/auto_cz.png
|
\caption{Automatic evaluation using LLM-as-judges. Scores are between 0 and 10. Violin plot with mean distribution as blue line. *** for p$\leq$0.005}
|
\label{fig:auto_cz}
| null |
151
|
2508.00476
|
figures/auto_en.png
|
\caption{Automatic evaluation using LLM-as-judges. Scores are between 2 and 10. Violin plot with distribution mean as blue line. *** for p$\leq$0.005}
|
\label{fig:auto_en}
| null |
152
|
2508.00476
|
figures/manual_en.png
|
\caption{Human evaluation. Scores are between 2 and 10. Violin plot with distribution mean as blue line. *** for p$\leq$0.005}
|
\label{fig:manual_en}
| null |
295
|
2508.00667
|
logc_est_bias_2.png
|
\caption{Same as Figure~\ref{fig:logM_est_bias}, but shows the lensing estimator bias of $\log \hat{c}$. }
|
\label{fig:logc_est_bias}
| null |
153
|
2508.00476
|
figures/auto_vs_manual_en.png
|
\caption{Human versus automatic evaluation. Scores are between 2 and 10. Violin plot with distribution mean as blue line. *** for p$\leq$0.005}
|
\label{fig:manual_auto_en}
| null |
154
|
2508.00721
|
fig/chi2LL.png
|
\caption{Plot of the function $h(\mb z_0)$ (after a change of variable $u = \norm{\mb z_0}_2^2$). An ideal regularization function should blow up sharply away from the narrow concentration region in orange to promote Gaussianity effectively.}
|
\label{fig:chi2LL}
| null |
155
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-afhq-measurement.png
|
\caption{Measurement}
| null | null |
156
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-afhq-gt.png
|
\caption{Ground Truth}
| null | null |
157
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-afhq-dip.png
|
\caption{DIP}
| null | null |
158
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-afhq-flowchef.png
|
\caption{FlowChef}
| null | null |
159
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-afhq-flowdps.png
|
\caption{FlowDPS}
| null | null |
160
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-afhq-dflow.png
|
\caption{D-Flow}
| null | null |
161
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-afhq-fmplug-w.png
|
\caption{FMPlug-W}
| null | null |
162
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-afhq-fmplug-w-r.png
|
\caption{FMPlug-W-R}
| null | null |
163
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-afhq-measurement.png
|
\caption{Measurement}
| null | null |
164
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-afhq-gt.png
|
\caption{Ground Truth}
| null | null |
165
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-afhq-dip.png
|
\caption{DIP}
| null | null |
166
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-afhq-flowchef.png
|
\caption{FlowChef}
| null | null |
167
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-afhq-flowdps.png
|
\caption{FlowDPS}
| null | null |
168
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-afhq-dflow.png
|
\caption{D-Flow}
| null | null |
169
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-afhq-fmplug-w.png
|
\caption{FMPlug-W}
| null | null |
170
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-afhq-fmplug-w-r.png
|
\caption{FMPlug-W-R}
| null | null |
171
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-div-measurement.png
|
\caption{Measurement}
| null | null |
172
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-div-gt.png
|
\caption{Ground Truth}
| null | null |
173
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-div-dip.png
|
\caption{DIP}
| null | null |
174
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-div-flowchef.png
|
\caption{FlowChef}
| null | null |
175
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-div-flowdps.png
|
\caption{FlowDPS}
| null | null |
176
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-div-dflow.png
|
\caption{D-Flow}
| null | null |
177
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-div-fmplug-w.png
|
\caption{FMPlug-W}
| null | null |
178
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-div-fmplug-w-r.png
|
\caption{FMPlug-W-R}
| null | null |
179
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-div-measurement.png
|
\caption{Measurement}
| null | null |
180
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-div-gt.png
|
\caption{Ground Truth}
| null | null |
181
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-div-dip.png
|
\caption{DIP}
| null | null |
182
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-div-flowchef.png
|
\caption{FlowChef}
| null | null |
183
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-div-flowdps.png
|
\caption{FlowDPS}
| null | null |
184
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-div-dflow.png
|
\caption{D-Flow}
| null | null |
185
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-div-fmplug-w.png
|
\caption{FMPlug-W}
| null | null |
186
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/sr-div-fmplug-w-r.png
|
\caption{FMPlug-W-R}
| null | null |
187
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/gd-afhq-measurement.png
|
\caption{Measurement}
| null | null |
188
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/gd-afhq-gt.png
|
\caption{Ground Truth}
| null | null |
189
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/gd-afhq-dip.png
|
\caption{DIP}
| null | null |
190
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/gd-afhq-flowchef.png
|
\caption{FlowChef}
| null | null |
191
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/gd-afhq-flowdps.png
|
\caption{FlowDPS}
| null | null |
192
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/gd-afhq-dflow.png
|
\caption{D-Flow}
| null | null |
193
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/gd-afhq-fmplug-w.png
|
\caption{FMPlug-W}
| null | null |
194
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/gd-afhq-fmplug-w-r.png
|
\caption{FMPlug-W-R}
| null | null |
195
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/gd-afhq-measurement.png
|
\caption{Measurement}
| null | null |
196
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/gd-afhq-gt.png
|
\caption{Ground Truth}
| null | null |
197
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/gd-afhq-dip.png
|
\caption{DIP}
| null | null |
198
|
2508.00721
|
fig/visualization/gd-afhq-flowchef.png
|
\caption{FlowChef}
| null | null |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.